Hubbry Logo
GariglianoGariglianoMain
Open search
Garigliano
Community hub
Garigliano
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Garigliano
Garigliano
Garigliano
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Garigliano
The Garigliano near its mouth
Map
Location
CountryItaly
Physical characteristics
Source 
 • locationnear Cassino
 • elevationc. 130 m (430 ft)
MouthTyrrhenian Sea
 • location
near Minturno
 • coordinates
41°13′22″N 13°45′42″E / 41.2229°N 13.7617°E / 41.2229; 13.7617
 • elevation
0 m (0 ft)
Length38 km (24 mi)(158 km or 98 mi including the Liri)
Basin size5,020 km2 (1,940 sq mi)
Discharge 
 • average120 m3/s (4,200 cu ft/s)

The Garigliano (Italian pronunciation: [ɡariʎˈʎaːno]) is a river in central Italy.

It forms at the confluence of the rivers Gari (also known as the Rapido) and Liri. Garigliano is actually a deformation of "Gari-Lirano" (which in Italian means something like "Gari from the Liri"). In ancient times the whole course of the Liri and Garigliano was known as the Liris.

For the most part of its 40 km (25 mi) length, the Garigliano River marks the border between the Italian regions of Lazio and Campania. In medieval times, the river (then known as the Verde) marked the southern border of the Papal States.

Historical significance

[edit]

Western Roman Emperor Majorian engaged a Vandal raiding party in battle at Garigliano in 457.

In the 9th and early 10th centuries, a band of Saracens established themselves on the banks of the river, from where they launched frequent raids on Campania and central Italy. In 915 a coalition of Pope John X, the Byzantines, Franks, Lombards, and Naples defeated the Garigliano Arabs in the Battle of Garigliano.

In 1503, Spanish and French forces fought another battle of Garigliano, in which Piero II de' Medici was drowned, thus control of the Medici family passed to Giovanni de' Medici, later Pope Leo X. The bigger French Army was practically destroyed at little cost to the Spanish, with the remnants later surrendering at Gaeta.

1944, U.S. Army painting.

During the Italian Campaign of World War II, the Liri-Gari-Garigliano rivers stood at the centre of a system of German defensive lines (the most famous of which is the Gustav Line) around which the battle of Monte Cassino took place in 1943–1944. Rumours tell that the waters of the river ran red in the Cassino area during the famous battle, because of the blood of the many corpses of soldiers.

Nuclear power plant

[edit]
See also: Garigliano Nuclear Power Plant

From 1959 until 1982 there was a BWR nuclear power plant named Garigliano near the town Sessa Aurunca.

See also

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Garigliano

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Garigliano River constitutes the lower course of the Liri River in , extending approximately 40 kilometers from the confluence near Sant'Apollinare and forming the border between the and regions before emptying into the near . The full Liri-Garigliano system measures 158 kilometers in length, originating in the from the merger of the Rapido and Liri branches. Historically, the Garigliano has marked significant geopolitical boundaries, serving as the southern limit of the in and a contested in various conflicts. Ancient Romans established the colony of Minturnae at its mouth in the late to secure the , highlighting its strategic value for controlling access routes. The river featured prominently in military campaigns, including the 1503 Battle of Garigliano during the and as a defensive line in , where Allied forces crossed it in January 1944 amid the Italian Campaign to breach the Gustav Line. Geomorphologically, the Garigliano plain encompasses a deltaic area with historical wetlands and coastal progradation, influenced by evolution and human reclamation efforts that altered its environmental dynamics from prehistoric forest cover to modern agricultural landscapes.

Geography

Physical Characteristics

The Garigliano River forms at the of the Liri and Gari rivers near Sant'Apollinare, of , marking the beginning of its approximately 40-kilometer course as the Garigliano proper, which serves as the border between the and . Including the Liri upstream, the total river length reaches 158 kilometers, originating from the Monte Camiciola in the Monti Simbruini of the central Apennines at an elevation of about 1,701 meters. The river flows southeastward through the Liri Valley, transitioning from mountainous terrain to the of the Garigliano Plain before emptying into the near at coordinates approximately 41°13′N 13°46′E. The drainage basin of the Liri-Garigliano system covers roughly 5,020 square kilometers, encompassing parts of , , and , with a pluvial regime influenced by Apennine precipitation patterns leading to seasonal floods in winter and spring and low flows in summer. Principal tributaries include the Sacco River (87 km long), joining from the left near Ceprano, and the Melfa, contributing to the basin's hydrological network; the Gari itself is a key right-bank forming the Garigliano. Average low-flow discharge at the mouth measures about 44 cubic meters per second, reflecting the river's variability in a context.

Hydrological and Ecological Features

The Garigliano River constitutes the final 38-kilometer segment of the Liri-Garigliano system, which originates in the Apennines and drains a basin spanning approximately 4,900 square kilometers across and regions in central-southern . The river's average discharge at the mouth measures 120 cubic meters per second, reflecting a Mediterranean hydrological characterized by elevated winter and spring flows from and , contrasted with reduced summer discharges influenced by seasonal and upstream abstractions. The basin encompasses diverse terrains, including mountainous headwaters, alluvial plains, and coastal deltas, with principal tributaries such as the Melfa and Rapido rivers contributing to the overall flow volume and . Hydrological modeling studies highlight variability in interactions along the lower reaches, where the river recharges in the alluvial plain, supporting piezometric levels that fluctuate with seasonal recharge rates. Ecologically, the Garigliano delta and lower plain host significant habitats, including freshwater marshes and coastal lagoons formed behind beach ridges, which have historically alternated with drained agricultural lands due to human interventions like drainage and embankment works. These wetlands sustain diverse vegetation assemblages dominated by halophytic and hydrophytic species, as evidenced by records from mid- sediments indicating prevalent marshland such as reeds and sedges. Faunal in the area includes avian species adapted to environments, amphibians, and fish populations in the riverine and estuarine zones, though the has undergone modifications from land reclamation and hydrological alterations since antiquity. Coastal dunes adjacent to the river mouth further enhance habitat heterogeneity, stabilizing sediments and buffering against erosion while providing niches for specialized dune and invertebrates. Persistent organic pollutants have been detected in environmental matrices within the broader region, underscoring ongoing monitoring needs for ecological integrity amid anthropogenic pressures.

Historical Background

Ancient and Pre-Modern Significance

In antiquity, the Garigliano River, anciently known as the Liris, functioned as a natural boundary in , delineating territories during early Roman expansions against neighboring Italic tribes. records that Roman forces under aimed to subjugate the lands between the Liris and rivers, highlighting its role in defining geopolitical limits from the Apennine foothills. The river's lower course, noted by Roman poets for its tranquil flow, supported strategic settlements; Minturnae, a Roman colony founded in 295 BC near its , controlled key points along the Via Appia, enhancing connectivity between and . Pre-Roman religious practices persisted in the vicinity, including the cult of the Marica on the river's right bank, attesting to the area's cultural continuity from indigenous Italic traditions into the Roman era. During the medieval period, the Garigliano, occasionally termed the Verde, marked the southern frontier of the , serving as a defensive buffer against incursions. Saracen raiders established a fortified base at its mouth from the 870s, launching attacks that sacked in 846 and menaced Lazio's coastal regions. This stronghold's threat prompted a Christian in 915, comprising forces from , , , , and Byzantine territories, personally led by . The ensuing Battle of Garigliano decisively crushed the garrison, expelling the invaders and dismantling their fortress, thereby stabilizing central Italy's borders. This victory, achieved through coordinated Lombard, Frankish, and Byzantine naval and land operations, curtailed Muslim raiding networks in the and reinforced papal authority over southern territories. Post-battle repopulation and agricultural revival in the hinterland underscored the event's lasting impact on regional security and economy.

World War II and Modern Conflicts

During , the Garigliano River formed a critical defensive line for German forces in the Italian Campaign, serving as the southern anchor of the Gustav Line. This fortified position, stretching across the Apennines to the Adriatic, aimed to halt the Allied advance toward following the Salerno landings in September 1943. German Army Group C, under , positioned elements of the 10th and 14th Armies along the river's banks, leveraging its width and surrounding marshy terrain for defensive advantage. The key Allied offensive involving the Garigliano commenced on January 17, 1944, as British X Corps of the U.S. Fifth Army launched an amphibious crossing of the lower river to establish a and support the broader assault on . Units including the British 56th (London) and 46th Infantry Divisions employed (LCTs) and DUKWs under cover of artillery barrages from 4.5-inch guns of the Royal Artillery, initiating combat at 2100 hours amid starlit conditions. Despite initial successes in securing footholds north of the river, German counterattacks from the 94th Infantry Division inflicted heavy losses, with the operation from January 17 to February 8 resulting in 4,152 Allied casualties (killed, wounded, or missing) against approximately 2,500 German killed and wounded. This crossing, known as the Garigliano Crossing, represented a diversionary effort to draw German reserves from Cassino but failed to achieve a decisive breakthrough due to flooded terrain, minefields, and resolute enemy defenses. British forces advanced to capture Minturno and Castelforte by mid-February, yet the overall Gustav Line held until the fourth Battle of Cassino in May 1944. The battle highlighted logistical challenges in winter river crossings, with non-battle casualties from cold and disease exacerbating combat losses in the Fifth Army's sector. No significant military conflicts have involved the Garigliano River in the post-World War II period, reflecting Italy's shift to membership and internal stability following the 1945 armistice.

Nuclear Power Plant

Design and Construction

The Garigliano featured a (BWR) of the first generation, designed with a net electrical capacity of 150 MWe and a thermal capacity of approximately 420 MWth. The reactor core consisted of 81 fuel assemblies in a 9x9 rod array, utilizing slightly oxide fuel rods, with water serving as both moderator and in a direct-cycle generation process. The design incorporated a BWR-1 model, emphasizing natural circulation capabilities for the primary loop and a dry structure comprising a spherical shell supported by steel columns on a foundation, housing the reactor vessel, generators, and associated thermo-hydraulic components. Construction commenced on November 1, 1959, initiated by SENN (Società Elettro Nucleare Nazionale), a consortium involving Italian state entities such as ENEL and ENI, in collaboration with international partners including General Electric for reactor technology transfer. The site, selected near Sessa Aurunca along the Garigliano River for access to cooling water, spanned a gross area of about 2,000 m² with a building volume of roughly 60,000 m³ and structural weight exceeding 38,000 tons. Key construction elements included excavation for foundations, erection of the containment vessel by mid-1962, and installation of the turbine hall, with progress reports noting completion of major civil works by 1963 despite challenges in integrating imported nuclear components with domestic fabrication. The project marked Italy's initial foray into commercial , prioritizing standardization for future scalability as per national , though it faced delays from regulatory approvals and coordination for specialized alloys and pressure vessels. First criticality was achieved on June 5, 1964, followed by grid connection and commercial operation later that year, validating the BWR design's feasibility for Mediterranean climates with riverine cooling.

Operational History

The Garigliano Nuclear Power Plant, a 160 MWe designed by , achieved first criticality on June 5, 1963, and began supplying power to the grid on January 1, 1964, with commercial operations commencing in April 1964. Ownership was transferred to in 1965 following the company's establishment as Italy's national electricity utility. During its operational phase from to , the plant generated a total of 12.5 billion kWh of electricity, contributing to Italy's early output as one of four commercial reactors active by the mid-1960s. No major safety incidents were recorded, though routine maintenance and operational challenges accumulated over time, reflecting the technical limitations of first-generation technology. Operations ceased in August 1978 due to escalating maintenance requirements and economic unviability, with energy production halting thereafter; the reactor was permanently shut down on March 1, 1982, primarily owing to high operating costs that rendered continued use uneconomical compared to alternative energy sources. This closure preceded Italy's broader nuclear phase-out, which was formalized post-Chernobyl via 1987 referendum but did not directly influence Garigliano's earlier decommissioning driven by plant-specific financial pressures. The facility was then placed in safe storage until handover to SOGIN for decommissioning in 1999.

Shutdown and Decommissioning Process

The Garigliano Nuclear Power Plant, a 150 MWe , underwent final shutdown on March 1, 1982, marking the end of its operational phase that began with grid connection in January 1964. Immediately following shutdown, initial safe management activities commenced, including draining of the reactor's hydraulic circuits, removal of all elements from , and emptying of spent storage pools to minimize residual . These steps ensured of radiological risks while the plant entered a long-term surveillance phase, with structures maintained for public and environmental safety until formal decommissioning authorization. Responsibility for decommissioning transferred to SOGIN, Italy's state-owned entity, on November 1, 1999, aligning with national policy to phase out post-1987 . The formal decommissioning decree was issued in September 2012, enabling comprehensive dismantling under a deferred strategy that prioritizes fuel removal, radiological characterization, , component segmentation, and conditioning for interim storage. This process adheres to Italian regulatory standards for site release, targeting unrestricted reuse or greenfield restoration, with total costs estimated in line with national nuclear legacy management exceeding €234 million across sites. Progress has accelerated in recent years, with (RPV) dismantling initiating in late 2023; the first phase, involving removal of contaminated metallic internals, concluded in early 2024, reducing volume by over 90% through advanced segmentation techniques. Full RPV decommissioning is scheduled for completion by 2027, supported by robotic systems for handling activated materials. Concurrently, in April 2025, dismantling began on the legacy liquid treatment facility, processing approximately 1,000 tonnes of piping and equipment, with projections yielding only 15 tonnes of final conditioned waste for on-site storage pending national repository availability. These efforts integrate to verify compliance with dose limits below 10 microsieverts per hour for site release.

Technical Performance and Safety Data

The Garigliano Nuclear Power Plant featured a single (BWR) unit with a net electrical output capacity of 150 MWe and a thermal power rating of 506 MWt, representing an early prototype design supplied by . Operational from June 1964 until its shutdown on May 1, 1982, the plant maintained structural and safety integrity throughout its active phase, with post-operational monitoring confirming containment of radioactive materials within licensed limits. Performance metrics during operation included a of 73.41% and an of 85% over specific evaluation periods, reflecting reliable despite occasional outages typical of first-generation BWRs. The reactor's design incorporated standard BWR features such as direct steam generation for turbine drive, with neutron embrittlement surveillance programs monitoring vessel integrity under irradiation exposure. Efficiency was constrained by the era's technology, yielding thermal-to-electric conversion rates around 30%, consistent with contemporary BWR prototypes. Safety records indicate no core damage events, radiological releases exceeding regulatory thresholds, or accidents comparable to international incidents like Three Mile Island. Minor operational perturbations, such as biological fouling in non-nuclear cooling systems, were managed without impacting reactor safety or public exposure. Decommissioning-phase assessments, including seismic evaluations of the turbine building, affirmed compliance with performance-based criteria for ageing structures, with design class protections ensuring intermediate to high safety levels against seismic events. Environmental surveillance post-1982, including analysis in adjacent waters and sediments, detected no attributable elevations in activity concentrations beyond natural backgrounds.

Environmental Monitoring and Impact Assessments

Environmental monitoring programs for the Garigliano Nuclear Power Plant, established during its in the early 1960s, encompass systematic surveillance of air, , surface and underground , sediments, from the Garigliano River and adjacent Tyrrhenian coast, and local agrifood products including , fruits, and . SOGIN, the state-owned entity overseeing decommissioning, conducts hundreds of annual measurements across these matrices, supplemented by parallel networks operated by ARPA , in line with Italian nuclear regulations. These efforts include continuous atmospheric monitoring and periodic sampling to detect radionuclides such as cesium-137 and isotopes, with results forwarded to the Italian Nuclear Safety Authority and published in SOGIN's annual reports. Impact assessments during the plant's operational phase (1963–1982) and subsequent decommissioning, initiated in 1982 following a crack, have demonstrated compliance with discharge limits and negligible radiological releases. Formulas for evaluating liquid and gaseous effluents consistently yield values indicating minimal environmental perturbation, with no exceedances of authorized thresholds reported in official records. Decommissioning activities, including waste segmentation and site characterization as of 2024, are accompanied by targeted monitoring in surrounding soils and waterways to verify containment efficacy. Specific surveys reinforce these findings of low impact. An ISPRA-led investigation from June 2013 to January 2014, collaborating with ARPA Lazio and Campania, sampled environmental media around the site to establish baseline radioactivity prior to advanced decommissioning phases; concentrations of key radionuclides fell within natural regional variability, identifying no radiological anomalies or health risks. Likewise, a 2012 radiological assessment analyzed alpha, beta, and gamma activities in soil, water, air, and biota from the Garigliano vicinity, comparing results to a control area over 100 km distant; no significant elevations were detected, with levels attributable solely to natural background and global fallout from historical nuclear tests, unchanged from 2001 benchmarks. Ultrasensitive analyses of actinides in river water and sediments, conducted amid ongoing decommissioning, report concentrations below detection limits for anthropogenic inputs exceeding natural traces, affirming the absence of measurable ecological disruption to the Garigliano River basin. Overall, these evaluations, grounded in empirical sampling and , conclude that the plant's legacy poses no verifiable beyond baseline .

Economic Contributions and Regional Development

The construction of the Garigliano Nuclear Power Plant represented a major investment in southern Italy's infrastructure, financed in part by a $40 million from the World Bank in 1959, covering 60% of the estimated $64.6 million total cost, marking the Bank's first funding for a nuclear project. This initiative aligned with the Cassa per il Mezzogiorno program, aimed at reducing economic disparities between Italy's northern and southern regions by fostering industrial growth and reliable energy supply in the underdeveloped Mezzogiorno. Built between 1959 and 1962 on approximately 47 hectares near in , the plant involved substantial procurement from Italian firms for about 70% of construction work, though primarily northern suppliers, with equipment sourced from U.S. companies like . Additional funding included a £4 billion from ICIPU in 1964 and contributions totaling $1.875 million for initial operations. During its operational phase from 1963 to 1978, the 150 MW generated approximately 12.5 billion kWh of electricity, achieving a 61% rate and contributing to the national grid via a new 235 km high-voltage line connecting and . Employment peaked at around 226 personnel in 1962, including 177 managers and clerks plus 49 workers, with ongoing staffing of about 100 during full operation; recruitment emphasized specialized training, including U.S.-based programs at and facilities, offering salaries roughly double those at comparable state enterprises. The project spurred ancillary development, such as a dedicated residential village for staff, providing localized construction jobs and housing that supported community stability in an agrarian area. However, direct economic multipliers were constrained by limited southern supplier participation and higher operational costs compared to thermal plants (15-18% more per early studies), leading to subsidies via purchase agreements at £4 per kWh. While intended to catalyze long-term regional industrialization by lowering costs and attracting , the plant's contributions to Campania's were modest relative to expectations, producing only half the projected output due to technical issues and eventual closure amid shifts. Post-operational decommissioning, managed by Sogin since the , has sustained some employment through dismantling activities, though current staffing stands at zero for core operations as of 2023, with focus shifting to facilities. Overall, the facility exemplified state-driven efforts to integrate into peripheral , yielding gains but underscoring challenges in achieving self-sustaining regional upliftment.

Debates on Closure and Nuclear Policy Implications

The shutdown of the Garigliano Nuclear Power Plant on , , stemmed primarily from a detected crack in the low-pressure rotor, compounded by rising operational costs that rendered continued electricity production economically unviable compared to alternatives at the time. This technical closure preceded Italy's 1987 , which, influenced by the , mandated a nationwide nuclear phase-out and the decommissioning of all operational reactors by 1990. Although Garigliano's halt was not directly policy-driven, it highlighted vulnerabilities in Italy's early nuclear fleet, including aging imported designs and insufficient domestic fuel cycle infrastructure, fueling broader skepticism toward expansion. Post-closure debates centered on the balance between safety imperatives and , with proponents of nuclear retention arguing that premature shutdowns like Garigliano's ignored the plant's strong operational record—achieving over 85% in its later years—and low incident rates, as evidenced by IAEA-monitored performance data showing minimal radiological releases. Critics, including environmental groups, emphasized risks amplified by seismic activity in the region and the lack of on-site waste storage, though empirical assessments post-decommissioning have detected no significant environmental contamination beyond background levels. The transfer to SOGIN in 1999 and the 2012 decommissioning decree initiated a deferred dismantling strategy, projected to conclude by 2032 at a exceeding €500 million, raising questions about opportunity costs: funds diverted from potential upgrades versus the fiscal burden of imported , which rose to account for 15-20% of Italy's mix by the . These events underscored Italy's nuclear pivot, transforming a nation with four commercial reactors contributing 1.5-2% of electricity in the into a net importer reliant on French nuclear exports for about 5% of supply by , correlating with higher per-kWh costs (up 20-30% relative to nuclear-heavy peers) and elevated CO2 emissions from gas-fired . implications extended to regulatory inertia, as the phase-out delayed advancements and stranded assets, with Garigliano's BWR design serving as a in the inefficiencies of abrupt exits from low-carbon baseload sources. In recent discourse, figures like Gilberto Pichetto Fratin have advocated science-led reevaluation, citing Garigliano's safe decommissioning as proof of manageable legacy risks, amid 2025 legislative moves to enable small modular reactors (SMRs) for decarbonization without repeating past ideological overreactions. Opponents counter that seismic vulnerabilities and public opposition—evident in the 94% referendum turnout against revival in —necessitate alternatives like renewables, though data indicate nuclear's dispatchable nature better complements intermittent sources for grid stability. This tension reflects ongoing causal trade-offs: short-term political appeasement via closure versus long-term empirical benefits of sustained nuclear integration, as quantified by Italy's post-phase-out energy import dependency exceeding €50 billion annually by the .

References

  1. http://www.naplesldm.com/garigliano.php
  2. https://www.qrtour.it/minturno1/?lang=en
  3. https://www.londonirishrifles.com/index.php/regimental-history/significant-events-from-our-history/garigliano-river-january-1944/
  4. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/09596836211003242
  5. https://journals.openedition.org/geocarrefour/9237
  6. http://www.clubnauticogarigliano.it/il-fiume.html
  7. https://www.distrettoappenninomeridionale.it/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/R.4.1.pdf
  8. http://www.roccadevandro.net/fiume_garigliano.htm
  9. https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/garigliano_%28Enciclopedia-Italiana%29/
  10. https://www.cdsconlus.it/index.php/2016/10/21/il-garigliano-un-corso-di-storia/
  11. https://www.itia.ntua.gr/en/docinfo/1118/
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292797271_Hydrostratigraphical_setting_and_groundwater_quality_status_in_alluvial_aquifers_the_low_Garigliano_River_Basin_Southern_Italy_case_study
  13. https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/annali_di_botanica/article/view/10319
  14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261981650_Environmental_Impact_of_Coastal_Dunes_in_the_Area_Located_to_the_Left_of_the_Garigliano_River_Mouth_Campany_Italy
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0375674222001297
  16. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/minturnae
  17. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1478-0542.2009.00651.x
  18. https://academic.oup.com/book/31940/chapter/267652331
  19. https://works.hcommons.org/records/stapz-nrr20/files/dibranco-wolf_hindered_passages.pdf
  20. https://www.medievalists.net/2022/06/leonine-walls/
  21. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/rome-in-the-tenth-century/historical-synopsis/68EA06FEAC4C5EDE49C05E078948FB97
  22. https://www.sarahsundin.com/today-in-world-war-ii-history-jan-17-1944/
  23. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/ordeal-at-cassino/
  24. https://www.britain-at-war.org.uk/ww2/Derrick_Jackson/html/crossing_of_the_garigliano.htm
  25. https://www.montecassinowartours.com/british-battlefield-tour/
  26. https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205188797
  27. https://montecassinotours.com/en/gariglianowwiitour/
  28. https://history.army.mil/portals/143/Images/Publications/catalog/100-9.pdf
  29. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Italian-Campaign
  30. https://pris.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=325
  31. https://world-nuclear.org/nuclear-reactor-database/details/garigliano
  32. https://www.oecd-nea.org/science/wpncs/ADSNF/reports/Garigliano/eur-4638e.pdf
  33. https://www.facebook.com/groups/779220482206901/posts/5944676142327950/
  34. https://www.3tiprogetti.it/projects/garigliano-nuclear-power-plant/
  35. https://www-pub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/pdf/cnpp2009/countryprofiles/Italy/Italy2006.htm
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271419274_Garigliano_nuclear_power_plant_Seismic_evaluation_of_the_turbine_building
  37. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/4007437
  38. https://www-pub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/pdf/cnpp2003/cnpp_webpage/countryprofiles/Italy/Italy2003.htm
  39. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-g-n/italy
  40. https://www.sogin.it/en/closureoftheitaliannuclearcycle/italian-nuclear-sites/gariglianonuclearpowerplant/Pagine/default.aspx
  41. https://old.euronuclear.org/e-news/e-news-38/gammatracer.htm
  42. https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Work-begins-to-dismantle-Garigliano-reactor-vessel
  43. https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Tender-issued-for-removal-of-Italian-reactor-vesse
  44. https://www.sogin.it/en/closureoftheitaliannuclearcycle/italian-nuclear-sites/gariglianonuclearpowerplant/decommissioningprojects/reactor-dismantling.html
  45. https://www.nucnet.org/news/sogin-completes-first-phase-of-key-dismantling-project-at-garigliano-nuclear-power-plant-7-3-2024
  46. https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/removal-of-garigliano-liquid-waste-facility-under-way
  47. https://www.nucnet.org/news/key-dismantling-project-begins-at-italy-s-garigliano-nuclear-power-plant-4-3-2025
  48. https://www.sogin.it/en/media/news/the-return-of-metal-smelting-residues-completed-at-the-garigliano-plant.html
  49. https://www.isinucleare.it/en/nuclear-safety/nuclear-facilities-and-research-centers
  50. https://www-ns.iaea.org/downloads/ni/safety_convention/7th-review-meeting/italy-national-report-7th-rm-cns.pdf
  51. https://inis.iaea.org/records/q3jsb-vwf10
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0029549374900685
  53. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/te_540_prn.pdf
  54. https://www.witpress.com/elibrary/wit-transactions-on-the-built-environment/120/22686
  55. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/16/8033
  56. https://www.sogin.it/en/closureoftheitaliannuclearcycle/italian-nuclear-sites/gariglianonuclearpowerplant/environment.html
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377466175_DECOMMISSIONING_OF_THE_GARIGLIANO_NUCLEAR_PLANT_AND_ENVIRONMENTAL_MONITORING_OF_RADIONUCLIDES_IN_SURROUNDING_AREAS
  58. https://www.isprambiente.gov.it/en/publications/reports/survey-to-control-the-radioactivity-in-the-environment-in-the-zones-around-the-nuclear-power-plant-of-garigliano
  59. https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3895
  60. https://timeline.worldbank.org/en/timeline/eventdetail/2641
  61. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1355103/1/Della%20Gala_1355103_thesis.pdf
  62. https://academic.oup.com/book/27715/chapter/197881695
  63. https://www.radioprotection.org/articles/radiopro/abs/2005/02/p525/p525.html
  64. https://decode39.com/11971/italys-plan-for-a-nuclear-comeback/
  65. https://www.nucnet.org/news/italy-takes-key-step-in-bid-to-restart-nuclear-power-programme-10-1-2025
  66. https://www.cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/qa-italy-considers-controversial-return-nuclear-power
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.