Hubbry Logo
search
logo
11

Mahatma Gandhi

logo
Community Hub0 Subscribers
Read side by side
from Wikipedia

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi[c] (2 October 1869 – 30 January 1948)[2] was an Indian lawyer, anti-colonial activist, and political ethicist who employed nonviolent resistance to lead the successful campaign for India's independence from British rule. He inspired movements for civil rights and freedom across the world. The honorific Mahātmā (from Sanskrit, meaning great-souled, or venerable), first applied to him in South Africa in 1914, is used worldwide.[3]

Key Information

Born and raised in a Hindu family in coastal Gujarat, Gandhi trained in the law at the Inner Temple in London and was called to the bar at the age of 22. After two uncertain years in India, where he was unable to start a successful law practice, Gandhi moved to South Africa in 1893 to represent an Indian merchant in a lawsuit. He went on to live in South Africa for 21 years. Here, Gandhi raised a family and first employed nonviolent resistance in a campaign for civil rights. In 1915, aged 45, he returned to India and soon set about organising peasants, farmers, and urban labourers to protest against discrimination and excessive land tax.

Assuming leadership of the Indian National Congress in 1921, Gandhi led nationwide campaigns for easing poverty, expanding women's rights, building religious and ethnic amity, ending untouchability, and, above all, achieving swaraj or self-rule. Gandhi adopted the short dhoti woven with hand-spun yarn as a mark of identification with India's rural poor. He began to live in a self-sufficient residential community, to eat simple food, and undertake long fasts as a means of both introspection and political protest. Bringing anti-colonial nationalism to the common Indians, Gandhi led them in challenging the British-imposed salt tax with the 400 km (250 mi) Dandi Salt March in 1930 and in calling for the British to quit India in 1942. He was imprisoned many times and for many years in both South Africa and India.

Gandhi's vision of an independent India based on religious pluralism was challenged in the early 1940s by a Muslim nationalism which demanded a separate homeland for Muslims within British India. In August 1947, Britain granted independence, but the British Indian Empire was partitioned into two dominions, a Hindu-majority India and a Muslim-majority Pakistan. As many displaced Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs made their way to their new lands, religious violence broke out, especially in the Punjab and Bengal. Abstaining from the official celebration of independence, Gandhi visited the affected areas, attempting to alleviate distress. In the months following, he undertook several hunger strikes to stop the religious violence. The last of these was begun in Delhi on 12 January 1948, when Gandhi was 78. The belief that Gandhi had been too resolute in his defence of both Pakistan and Indian Muslims spread among some Hindus in India. Among these was Nathuram Godse, a militant Hindu nationalist from Pune, western India, who assassinated Gandhi by firing three bullets into his chest at an interfaith prayer meeting in Delhi on 30 January 1948.

Gandhi's birthday, 2 October, is commemorated in India as Gandhi Jayanti, a national holiday, and worldwide as the International Day of Nonviolence. Gandhi is considered to be the Father of the Nation in post-colonial India. During India's nationalist movement and in several decades immediately after, he was also commonly called Bapu, an endearment roughly meaning "father".

Early life and background

[edit]

Parents

[edit]

Gandhi's father, Karamchand Uttamchand Gandhi (1822–1885), served as the dewan (chief minister) of Porbandar state.[4][5] His family originated from the then village of Kutiana in what was then Junagadh State.[6] Although Karamchand only had been a clerk in the state administration and had an elementary education, he proved a capable chief minister.[6]

During his tenure, Karamchand married four times. His first two wives died young, after each had given birth to a daughter, and his third marriage was childless. In 1857, Karamchand sought his third wife's permission to remarry; that year, he married Putlibai (1844–1891), who also came from Junagadh,[6] and was from a Pranami Vaishnava family.[7][8][9] Karamchand and Putlibai had four children: a son, Laxmidas (c. 1860–1914), a daughter, Raliatbehn (1862–1960), a second son, Karsandas (c. 1866–1913),[10][11] and a third son, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi,[12] who was born on 2 October 1869 in Porbandar (also known as Sudamapuri), a coastal town on the Kathiawar Peninsula and then part of the small princely state of Porbandar in the Kathiawar Agency of the British Raj.[13]

In 1874, Gandhi's father, Karamchand, left Porbandar for the smaller state of Rajkot, where he became a counsellor to its ruler, the Thakur Sahib; though Rajkot was a less prestigious state than Porbandar, the British regional political agency was located there, which gave the state's diwan a measure of security.[14] In 1876, Karamchand became diwan of Rajkot and was succeeded as diwan of Porbandar by his brother Tulsidas. Karamchand's family then rejoined him in Rajkot.[14] They moved to their family home Kaba Gandhi No Delo in 1881.[15]

Childhood

[edit]
Gandhi in 1876 at the age of 7.

As a child, Gandhi was described by his sister Raliat as "restless as mercury, either playing or roaming about. One of his favourite pastimes was twisting dogs' ears."[16] The Indian classics, especially the stories of Shravana and king Harishchandra, had a great impact on Gandhi in his childhood. In his autobiography, Gandhi states that they left an indelible impression on his mind. Gandhi writes: "It haunted me and I must have acted Harishchandra to myself times without number." Gandhi's early self-identification with truth and love as supreme values is traceable to these epic characters.[17][18]

The family's religious background was eclectic. Mohandas was born into a Gujarati Hindu Modh Bania family.[19][20] Gandhi's father, Karamchand, was Hindu and his mother Putlibai was from a Pranami Vaishnava Hindu family.[21][22] Gandhi's father was of Modh Baniya caste in the varna of Vaishya.[23] His mother came from the medieval Krishna bhakti-based Pranami tradition, whose religious texts include the Bhagavad Gita, the Bhagavata Purana, and a collection of 14 texts with teachings that the tradition believes to include the essence of the Vedas, the Quran and the Bible.[22][24] Gandhi was deeply influenced by his mother, an extremely pious lady who "would not think of taking her meals without her daily prayers... she would take the hardest vows and keep them without flinching. To keep two or three consecutive fasts was nothing to her."[25]

At the age of nine, Gandhi entered the local school in Rajkot, near his home. There, he studied the rudiments of arithmetic, history, the Gujarati language and geography.[14] At the age of 11, Gandhi joined the High School in Rajkot, Alfred High School.[26] He was an average student, won some prizes, but was a shy and tongue-tied student, with no interest in games; Gandhi's only companions were books and school lessons.[27]

Marriage

[edit]

In May 1883, the 13-year-old Gandhi was married to 14-year-old Kasturbai Gokuldas Kapadia (her first name was usually shortened to "Kasturba", and affectionately to "Ba") in an arranged marriage, according to the custom of the region at that time.[28] In the process, he lost a year at school but was later allowed to make up by accelerating his studies.[29] Gandhi's wedding was a joint event, where his brother and cousin were also married. Recalling the day of their marriage, Gandhi once said, "As we didn't know much about marriage, for us it meant only wearing new clothes, eating sweets and playing with relatives." As was the prevailing tradition, the adolescent bride was to spend much time at her parents' house, and away from her husband.[30]

Writing many years later, Gandhi described with regret the lustful feelings he felt for his young bride: "Even at school I used to think of her, and the thought of nightfall and our subsequent meeting was ever haunting me." Gandhi later recalled feeling jealous and possessive of her, such as when Kasturba would visit a temple with her girlfriends, and being sexually lustful in his feelings for her.[31]

Gandhi (right) with his eldest brother Laxmidas in 1886[32]

In late 1885, Gandhi's father, Karamchand, died.[33] Gandhi had left his father's bedside to be with his wife mere minutes before his passing. Many decades later, Gandhi wrote "if animal passion had not blinded me, I should have been spared the torture of separation from my father during his last moments."[34] Later, Gandhi, then 16 years old, and his wife, age 17, had their first child, who survived only a few days. The two deaths anguished Gandhi.[33] The Gandhis had four more children, all sons: Harilal, born in 1888; Manilal, born in 1892; Ramdas, born in 1897; and Devdas, born in 1900.[28]

In November 1887, the 18-year-old Gandhi graduated from high school in Ahmedabad.[35] In January 1888, he enrolled at Samaldas College in Bhavnagar State, then the sole degree-granting institution of higher education in the region. However, Gandhi dropped out and returned to his family in Porbandar.[36]

Outside school, Gandhi's education was enriched by exposure to Gujarati literature, especially reformers like Narmad and Govardhanram Tripathi, whose works alerted the Gujaratis to their own faults and weaknesses such as belief in religious dogmatism.[37]

Three years in London

[edit]

Student of law

[edit]
Commemorative plaque at 20 Baron's Court Road, Barons Court, London

Gandhi had dropped out of the cheapest college he could afford in Bombay.[38] Mavji Dave Joshiji, a Brahmin priest and family friend, advised Gandhi and his family that he should consider law studies in London.[36][39] In July 1888, Gandhi's wife Kasturba gave birth to their first surviving child, Harilal.[40] Gandhi's mother was not comfortable about Gandhi leaving his wife and family and going so far from home. Gandhi's uncle Tulsidas also tried to dissuade his nephew, but Gandhi wanted to go. To persuade his wife and mother, Gandhi made a vow in front of his mother that he would abstain from meat, alcohol, and women. Gandhi's brother, Laxmidas, who was already a lawyer, cheered Gandhi's London studies plan and offered to support him. Putlibai gave Gandhi her permission and blessing.[36][41]

On 10 August 1888, Gandhi, aged 18, left Porbandar for Mumbai, then known as Bombay. A local newspaper covering the farewell function by his old high school in Rajkot noted that Gandhi was the first Bania from Kathiawar to proceed to England for his Barrister Examination.[37] As Mohandas Gandhi waited for a berth on a ship to London he found that he had attracted the ire of the Modh Banias of Bombay.[37] Upon arrival in Bombay, he stayed with the local Modh Bania community whose elders warned Gandhi that England would tempt him to compromise his religion, and eat and drink in Western ways. Despite Gandhi informing them of his promise to his mother and her blessings, Gandhi was excommunicated from his caste. Gandhi ignored this, and on 4 September, he sailed from Bombay to London, with his brother seeing him off.[38][40] Gandhi attended University College, London, where he took classes in English literature with Henry Morley in 1888–1889.[42]

Gandhi in London as a law student

Gandhi also enrolled at the Inns of Court School of Law in Inner Temple with the intention of becoming a barrister.[39] His childhood shyness and self-withdrawal had continued through his teens. Gandhi retained these traits when he arrived in London, but joined a public speaking practice group and overcame his shyness sufficiently to practise law.[43]

Gandhi demonstrated a keen interest in the welfare of London's impoverished dockland communities. In 1889, a bitter trade dispute broke out in London, with dockers striking for better pay and conditions, and seamen, shipbuilders, factory girls and other joining the strike in solidarity. The strikers were successful, in part due to the mediation of Cardinal Manning, leading Gandhi and an Indian friend to make a point of visiting the cardinal and thanking him for his work.[44]

Vegetarianism and committee work

[edit]
Gandhi with the Vegetarian Society on the Isle of Wight, 1890

His vow to his mother influenced Gandhi's time in London. Gandhi tried to adopt "English" customs, including taking dancing lessons.[45] However, he didn't appreciate the bland vegetarian food offered by his landlady and was frequently hungry until he found one of London's few vegetarian restaurants. Influenced by Henry Salt's writing, Gandhi joined the London Vegetarian Society (LVS) and was elected to its executive committee under the aegis of its president and benefactor Arnold Hills.[46] An achievement while on the committee was the establishment of a Bayswater chapter.[47] Some of the vegetarians Gandhi met were members of the Theosophical Society, which had been founded in 1875 to further universal brotherhood, and which was devoted to the study of Buddhist and Hindu literature. They encouraged Gandhi to join them in reading the Bhagavad Gita both in translation as well as in the original.[46]

Gandhi had a friendly and productive relationship with Hills, but the two men took a different view on the continued LVS membership of fellow committee member Thomas Allinson. Their disagreement is the first known example of Gandhi challenging authority, despite his shyness and temperamental disinclination towards confrontation.[citation needed]

Allinson had been promoting newly available birth control methods, but Hills disapproved of these, believing they undermined public morality. He believed vegetarianism to be a moral movement and that Allinson should therefore no longer remain a member of the LVS. Gandhi shared Hills' views on the dangers of birth control, but defended Allinson's right to differ.[48] It would have been hard for Gandhi to challenge Hills; Hills was 12 years his senior and unlike Gandhi, highly eloquent. Hills bankrolled the LVS and was a captain of industry with his Thames Ironworks company employing more than 6,000 people in the East End of London. Hills was also a highly accomplished sportsman who later founded the football club West Ham United. In his 1927 An Autobiography, Vol. I, Gandhi wrote:

The question deeply interested me...I had a high regard for Mr. Hills and his generosity. But I thought it was quite improper to exclude a man from a vegetarian society simply because he refused to regard puritan morals as one of the objects of the society[48]

A motion to remove Allinson was raised, and was debated and voted on by the committee. Gandhi's shyness was an obstacle to his defence of Allinson at the committee meeting. Gandhi wrote his views down on paper, but shyness prevented Gandhi from reading out his arguments, so Hills, the President, asked another committee member to read them out for him. Although some other members of the committee agreed with Gandhi, the vote was lost and Allinson was excluded. There were no hard feelings, with Hills proposing the toast at the LVS farewell dinner in honour of Gandhi's return to India.[49]

Called to the bar

[edit]

Gandhi, at age 22, was called to the bar in June 1891 and then left London for India, where he learned that his mother had died while he was in London and that his family had kept the news from Gandhi.[46] His attempts at establishing a law practice in Bombay failed because Gandhi was psychologically unable to cross-examine witnesses. He returned to Rajkot to make a modest living drafting petitions for litigants, but Gandhi was forced to stop after running afoul of British officer Sam Sunny.[46][47]

In 1893, a Muslim merchant in Kathiawar named Dada Abdullah contacted Gandhi. Abdullah owned a large successful shipping business in South Africa. His distant cousin in Johannesburg needed a lawyer, and they preferred someone with Kathiawari heritage. Gandhi inquired about his pay for the work. They offered a total salary of £105 (~$4,143 in 2023 money) plus travel expenses. He accepted it, knowing that it would be at least a one-year commitment in the Colony of Natal, South Africa, also a part of the British Empire.[47][50]

Civil rights activist in South Africa (1893–1914)

[edit]
Gandhi and the founders of the Natal Indian Congress, 1895

In April 1893, Gandhi, aged 23, set sail for South Africa to be the lawyer for Abdullah's cousin.[50][51] Gandhi spent 21 years in South Africa where he developed his political views, ethics, and politics.[52][53] During this time Gandhi briefly returned to India in 1902 to mobilise support for the welfare of Indians in South Africa.[54]

Immediately upon arriving in South Africa, Gandhi faced discrimination due to his skin colour and heritage.[55] Gandhi was not allowed to sit with European passengers in the stagecoach and was told to sit on the floor near the driver, then beaten when he refused; elsewhere, Gandhi was kicked into a gutter for daring to walk near a house, in another instance thrown off a train at Pietermaritzburg after refusing to leave the first-class.[38][56] Gandhi sat in the train station, shivering all night and pondering if he should return to India or protest for his rights.[56] Gandhi chose to protest and was allowed to board the train the next day.[57] In another incident, the magistrate of a Durban court ordered Gandhi to remove his turban, which he refused to do.[38] Indians were not allowed to walk on public footpaths in South Africa. Gandhi was kicked by a police officer out of the footpath onto the street without warning.[38]

When Gandhi arrived in South Africa, according to Arthur Herman, he thought of himself as "a Briton first, and an Indian second."[58] However, the prejudice against Gandhi and his fellow Indians from British people that Gandhi experienced and observed deeply bothered him. Gandhi found it humiliating, struggling to understand how some people can feel honour, superiority or pleasure in such inhumane practices.[56] Gandhi began to question his people's standing in the British Empire.[59]

The Abdullah case that had brought him to South Africa concluded in May 1894, and the Indian community organised a farewell party for Gandhi as he prepared to return to India.[60] The farewell party was turned into a working committee to plan the resistance to a new Natal government discriminatory proposal. This led to Gandhi extending his original period of stay in South Africa. Gandhi planned to assist Indians in opposing a bill to deny them the right to vote, a right then proposed to be an exclusive European right. He asked Joseph Chamberlain, the British Colonial Secretary, to reconsider his position on this bill.[52] Though unable to halt the bill's passage, Gandhi's campaign was successful in drawing attention to the grievances of Indians in South Africa. He helped found the Natal Indian Congress in 1894,[47][57] and through this organisation, Gandhi moulded the Indian community of South Africa into a unified political force. In January 1897, when Gandhi landed in Durban, a mob of white settlers attacked him,[61] and Gandhi escaped only through the efforts of the wife of the police superintendent.[citation needed] However, Gandhi refused to press charges against any member of the mob.[47]

Gandhi (middle, third from right) with the stretcher-bearers of the Indian Ambulance Corps during the Boer War

During the Boer War, Gandhi volunteered in 1900 to form a group of stretcher-bearers as the Natal Indian Ambulance Corps. According to Arthur Herman, Gandhi wanted to disprove the British colonial stereotype that Hindus were not fit for "manly" activities involving danger and exertion, unlike the Muslim "martial races."[62] Gandhi raised 1,100 Indian volunteers to support British combat troops against the Boers. They were trained and medically certified to serve on the front lines. They were auxiliaries at the Battle of Colenso to a White volunteer ambulance corps. At the Battle of Spion Kop, Gandhi and his bearers moved to the front line and had to carry wounded soldiers for miles to a field hospital since the terrain was too rough for the ambulances. Gandhi and 37 other Indians received the Queen's South Africa Medal.[63][64]

Gandhi and his wife Kasturba (1902)

In 1906, the Transvaal government promulgated a new Act compelling registration of the colony's Indian and Chinese populations. The law required Asians to undergo fingerprint registration and to carry identity certificates that officials could demand at any time.[65] Historians have noted that Gandhi's resistance was therefore also a protest against a system of biometric identification that treated Indians as criminal subjects.[65] Gandhi initially accepted voluntary registration as a gesture of trust, but later realized that once fingerprints were recorded, individuals lost the right to withdraw their consent. This then shaped Gandhi's understanding of Satyagraha as a defense of dignity and personal autonomy.[65] At a mass protest meeting held in Johannesburg on 11 September that year, Gandhi adopted his still evolving methodology of Satyagraha (devotion to the truth), or nonviolent protest, for the first time.[66] According to Anthony Parel, Gandhi was also influenced by the Tamil moral text Tirukkuṛaḷ after Leo Tolstoy mentioned it in their correspondence that began with "A Letter to a Hindu".[67][68] Gandhi urged Indians to defy the new law and to suffer the punishments for doing so. His ideas of protests, persuasion skills, and public relations had emerged. Gandhi took these back to India in 1915.[69][70]

Europeans, Indians and Africans

[edit]

Gandhi focused his attention on Indians and Africans while he was in South Africa. Initially, Gandhi was not interested in politics, but this changed after he was discriminated against and bullied, such as by being thrown out of a train coach due to his skin colour by a white train official. After several such incidents with Whites in South Africa, Gandhi's thinking and focus changed, and he felt he must resist this and fight for rights. Gandhi entered politics by forming the Natal Indian Congress.[71] According to Ashwin Desai and Goolam Vahed, Gandhi's views on racism are contentious in some cases. He suffered persecution from the beginning in South Africa. Like with other coloured people, white officials denied Gandhi his rights, and the press and those in the streets bullied and called Gandhi a "parasite", "semi-barbarous", "canker", "squalid coolie", "yellow man", and other epithets. People would even spit on him as an expression of racial hate.[72]

Advertisement of the Indian Opinion, a newspaper founded by Gandhi

While in South Africa, Gandhi focused on the racial persecution of Indians before he started to focus on racism against Africans. In some cases, state Desai and Vahed, Gandhi's behaviour was one of being a willing part of racial stereotyping and African exploitation.[72] During a speech in September 1896, Gandhi complained that the whites in the British colony of South Africa were "degrading the Indian to the level of a raw Kaffir."[73] Scholars cite it as an example of evidence that Gandhi at that time thought of Indians and black South Africans differently.[72] As another example given by Herman, Gandhi, at the age of 24, prepared a legal brief for the Natal Assembly in 1895, seeking voting rights for Indians. Gandhi cited race history and European Orientalists' opinions that "Anglo-Saxons and Indians are sprung from the same Aryan stock or rather the Indo-European peoples" and argued that Indians should not be grouped with the Africans.[60]

Years later, Gandhi and his colleagues served and helped Africans as nurses and by opposing racism. The Nobel Peace Prize winner Nelson Mandela is among admirers of Gandhi's efforts to fight against racism in Africa.[74] The general image of Gandhi, state Desai and Vahed, has been reinvented since his assassination as though Gandhi was always a saint, when in reality, his life was more complex, contained inconvenient truths, and was one that changed over time.[72] Scholars have also pointed the evidence to a rich history of co-operation and efforts by Gandhi and Indian people with nonwhite South Africans against persecution of Africans and the Apartheid.[75]

In 1903, Gandhi started the Indian Opinion, a journal that carried news of Indians in South Africa, Indians in India with articles on all subjects – social, moral and intellectual. Each issue was multi-lingual and carried material in English, Gujarati, Hindi and Tamil. It carried ads, depended heavily on Gandhi's contributions (often printed without a byline) and was an "advocate" for the Indian cause.[76]

In 1906, when the Bambatha Rebellion broke out in the colony of Natal, the then 36-year-old Gandhi, despite sympathising with the Zulu rebels, encouraged Indian South Africans to form a volunteer stretcher-bearer unit.[77] Writing in the Indian Opinion, Gandhi argued that military service would be beneficial to the Indian community and claimed it would give them "health and happiness."[78] Gandhi eventually led a volunteer mixed unit of Indian and African stretcher-bearers to treat wounded combatants during the suppression of the rebellion.[77]

Gandhi photographed in South Africa (1909)

The medical unit commanded by Gandhi operated for less than two months before being disbanded.[77] After the suppression of the rebellion, the colonial establishment showed no interest in extending to the Indian community the civil rights granted to white South Africans.

By 1910, Gandhi's newspaper, Indian Opinion, was covering reports on discrimination against Africans by the colonial regime. Gandhi remarked that the Africans "alone are the original inhabitants of the land. … The whites, on the other hand, have occupied the land forcibly and appropriated it for themselves."[79]

In 1910, Gandhi established, with the help of his friend Hermann Kallenbach, an idealistic community they named Tolstoy Farm near Johannesburg.[80][81] There, Gandhi nurtured his policy of peaceful resistance.[82]

In the years after black South Africans gained the right to vote in South Africa (1994), Gandhi was proclaimed a national hero with numerous monuments.[83]

Struggle for Indian independence (1915–1947)

[edit]
Welcome received at Karachi after Gandhi's (seated in carriage on the right) return to India (1916)

At the request of Gopal Krishna Gokhale, conveyed to Gandhi by C. F. Andrews, Gandhi returned to India in 1915. He brought an international reputation as a leading Indian nationalist, theorist and community organiser.

Gandhi joined the Indian National Congress and was introduced to Indian issues, politics and the Indian people primarily by Gokhale. Gokhale was a key leader of the Congress Party best known for his restraint and moderation, and his insistence on working inside the system. Gandhi took Gokhale's liberal approach based on British Whiggish traditions and transformed it to make it look Indian.[84]

Gandhi took leadership of the Congress in 1920 and began escalating demands until on 26 January 1930 the Indian National Congress declared the independence of India. The British did not recognise the declaration, but negotiations ensued, with the Congress taking a role in provincial government in the late 1930s. Gandhi and the Congress withdrew their support of the Raj when the Viceroy declared war on Germany in September 1939 without consultation. Tensions escalated until Gandhi demanded immediate independence in 1942, and the British responded by imprisoning him and tens of thousands of Congress leaders. Meanwhile, the Muslim League did co-operate with Britain and moved, against Gandhi's strong opposition, to demands for a totally separate Muslim state of Pakistan. In August 1947, the British partitioned the land with India and Pakistan each achieving independence on terms that Gandhi disapproved.[85]

Role in World War I

[edit]

In April 1918, during the latter part of World War I, the Viceroy invited Gandhi to a War Conference in Delhi.[86] Gandhi agreed to support the war effort.[38][87] In contrast to the Zulu War of 1906 and the outbreak of World War I in 1914, when he recruited volunteers for the Ambulance Corps, this time Gandhi attempted to recruit combatants. In a June 1918 leaflet entitled "Appeal for Enlistment", Gandhi wrote: "To bring about such a state of things we should have the ability to defend ourselves, that is, the ability to bear arms and to use them... If we want to learn the use of arms with the greatest possible despatch, it is our duty to enlist ourselves in the army."[88] However, Gandhi stipulated in a letter to the Viceroy's private secretary that he "personally will not kill or injure anybody, friend or foe."[89]

Gandhi's support for the war campaign brought into question his consistency on nonviolence. Gandhi's private secretary noted that "The question of the consistency between his creed of 'Ahimsa' (nonviolence) and his recruiting campaign was raised not only then but has been discussed ever since."[87] According to political and educational scientist Christian Bartolf, Gandhi's support for the war stemmed from his belief that true ahimsa could not exist simultaneously with cowardice. Therefore, Gandhi felt that Indians needed to be willing and capable of using arms before they voluntarily chose non-violence.[90]

In July 1918, Gandhi said that he could not persuade even one individual to enlist for the world war. "So far I have not a single recruit to my credit apart," Gandhi wrote. He added: "They object because they fear to die."[91]

Champaran agitations

[edit]
Gandhi in 1918, at the time of the Kheda and Champaran Satyagrahas

Gandhi's first major achievement came in 1917 with the Champaran agitation in Bihar. The Champaran agitation pitted the local peasantry against largely Anglo-Indian plantation owners who were backed by the local administration. The peasants were forced to grow indigo (Indigofera sp.), a cash crop for Indigo dye whose demand had been declining over two decades and were forced to sell their crops to the planters at a fixed price. Unhappy with this, the peasantry appealed to Gandhi at his ashram in Ahmedabad. Pursuing a strategy of nonviolent protest, Gandhi took the administration by surprise and won concessions from the authorities.[92]

Kheda agitations

[edit]

In 1918, Kheda was hit by floods and famine and the peasantry was demanding relief from taxes. Gandhi moved his headquarters to Nadiad,[93] organising scores of supporters and fresh volunteers from the region, the most notable being Vallabhbhai Patel.[94] Using non-co-operation as a technique, Gandhi initiated a signature campaign where peasants pledged non-payment of revenue even under the threat of confiscation of land. A social boycott of mamlatdars and talatdars (revenue officials within the district) accompanied the agitation. Gandhi worked hard to win public support for the agitation across the country. For five months, the administration refused, but by the end of May 1918, the government gave way on important provisions and relaxed the conditions of payment of revenue tax until the famine ended. In Kheda, Vallabhbhai Patel represented the farmers in negotiations with the British, who suspended revenue collection and released all the prisoners.[95]

Khilafat Movement

[edit]
Gandhi (wearing a Gandhi cap) with Rabindranath Tagore and Sharda Mehta, 1920

In 1919, following World War I, Gandhi (aged 49) sought political co-operation from Muslims in his fight against British imperialism by supporting the Ottoman Empire that had been defeated in the World War. Before this initiative of Gandhi, communal disputes and religious riots between Hindus and Muslims were common in British India, such as the riots of 1917–18. Gandhi had already vocally supported the British crown in the first world war.[96] This decision of Gandhi was in part motivated by the British promise to reciprocate the help with swaraj (self-government) to Indians after the end of World War I.[97] The British government had offered, instead of self-government, minor reforms instead, disappointing Gandhi.[98] He announced his satyagraha (civil disobedience) intentions. The British colonial officials made their counter move by passing the Rowlatt Act, to block Gandhi's movement. The Act allowed the British government to treat civil disobedience participants as criminals and gave it the legal basis to arrest anyone for "preventive indefinite detention, incarceration without judicial review or any need for a trial."[99]

Gandhi felt that Hindu-Muslim co-operation was necessary for political progress against the British. He leveraged the Khilafat Movement, wherein Sunni Muslims in India, their leaders such as the sultans of princely states in India and the Ali brothers (Shaukat Ali and Mohammad Ali Jauhar) championed the Turkish Caliph as a solidarity symbol of Sunni Islamic community (ummah). They saw the Caliph as their means to support Islam and the Islamic law after the defeat of Ottoman Empire in World War I.[100][101][102] Gandhi's support to the Khilafat Movement led to mixed results. It initially led to a strong Muslim support for Gandhi. However, the Hindu leaders including Rabindranath Tagore questioned Gandhi's leadership because they were largely against recognising or supporting the Sunni Islamic Caliph in Turkey.[d]

The increasing Muslim support for Gandhi, after he championed the Caliph's cause, temporarily stopped the Hindu-Muslim communal violence. It offered evidence of inter-communal harmony in joint Rowlatt satyagraha demonstration rallies, raising Gandhi's stature as the political leader to the British.[106][107] His support for the Khilafat Movement also helped Gandhi sideline Muhammad Ali Jinnah, who had announced his opposition to the satyagraha non-co-operation movement approach of Gandhi. Jinnah began creating his independent support, and later went on to lead the demand for West and East Pakistan. Though they agreed in general terms on Indian independence, they disagreed on the means of achieving this. Jinnah was mainly interested in dealing with the British via constitutional negotiation, rather than attempting to agitate the masses.[108][109][110]

In 1922, the Khilafat Movement gradually collapsed following the end of the non-cooperation movement with the arrest of Gandhi.[111] A number of Muslim leaders and delegates abandoned Gandhi and Congress.[112] Hindu-Muslim communal conflicts reignited, and deadly religious riots re-appeared in numerous cities, with 91 in United Provinces of Agra and Oudh alone.[113][114]

Non-co-operation

[edit]

With his book Hind Swaraj (1909) Gandhi, aged 40, declared that British rule was established in India with the co-operation of Indians and had survived only because of this co-operation. If Indians refused to co-operate, British rule would collapse and swaraj (Indian independence) would come.[5][115]

Gandhi with Annie Besant en route to a meeting in Madras in September 1921. Earlier, in Madurai, on 21 September 1921, Gandhi had adopted the loin-cloth for the first time as a symbol of his identification with India's poor.

In February 1919, Gandhi cautioned the Viceroy of India with a cable communication that if the British were to pass the Rowlatt Act, he would appeal to Indians to start civil disobedience.[116] The British government ignored him and passed the law, stating it would not yield to threats. The satyagraha civil disobedience followed, with people assembling to protest the Rowlatt Act. On 30 March 1919, British law officers opened fire on an assembly of unarmed people, peacefully gathered, participating in satyagraha in Delhi.[116]

People rioted in retaliation. On 6 April 1919, a Hindu festival day, Gandhi asked a crowd to remember not to injure or kill British people, but to express their frustration with peace, to boycott British goods and burn any British clothing they owned. He emphasised the use of non-violence to the British and towards each other, even if the other side used violence. Communities across India announced plans to gather in greater numbers to protest. Government warned him not to enter Delhi, but Gandhi defied the order and was arrested on 9 April.[116]

On 13 April 1919, people including women with children gathered in an Amritsar park, and British Indian Army officer Reginald Dyer surrounded them and ordered troops under his command to fire on them. The resulting Jallianwala Bagh massacre (or Amritsar massacre) of hundreds of Sikh and Hindu civilians enraged the subcontinent but was supported by some Britons and parts of the British media as a necessary response. Gandhi in Ahmedabad, on the day after the massacre in Amritsar, did not criticise the British and instead criticised his fellow countrymen for not exclusively using "love" to deal with the "hate" of the British government.[116] Gandhi demanded that the Indian people stop all violence, stop all property destruction, and went on fast-to-death to pressure Indians to stop their rioting.[117]

The massacre and Gandhi's non-violent response to it moved many, but also made some Sikhs and Hindus upset that Dyer was getting away with murder. Investigation committees were formed by the British, which Gandhi asked Indians to boycott.[116] The unfolding events, the massacre and the British response, led Gandhi to the belief that Indians will never get a fair equal treatment under British rulers, and he shifted his attention to swaraj and political independence for India.[118] In 1921, Gandhi was the leader of the Indian National Congress.[102] He reorganised the Congress. With Congress now behind Gandhi, and Muslim support triggered by his backing the Khilafat Movement to restore the Caliph in Turkey,[102] Gandhi had political support and the attention of the British Raj.[105][99][101]

Gandhi spinning yarn

Gandhi expanded his nonviolent non-co-operation platform to include the swadeshi policy – the boycott of foreign-made goods, especially British goods. Linked to this was his advocacy that khadi (homespun cloth) be worn by all Indians instead of British-made textiles. Gandhi exhorted Indian men and women, rich or poor, to spend time each day spinning khadi in support of the independence movement.[119] In addition to boycotting British products, Gandhi urged the people to boycott British institutions and law courts, to resign from government employment, and to forsake British titles and honours. Gandhi thus began his journey aimed at crippling the British India government economically, politically and administratively.[120]

The appeal of "Non-cooperation" grew, its social popularity drew participation from all strata of Indian society. Gandhi was arrested on 10 March 1922, tried for sedition, and sentenced to six years' imprisonment. He began his sentence on 18 March 1922. With Gandhi isolated in prison, the Indian National Congress split into two factions, one led by Chitta Ranjan Das and Motilal Nehru favouring party participation in the legislatures, and the other led by Chakravarti Rajagopalachari and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, opposing this move.[121] Furthermore, co-operation among Hindus and Muslims ended as Khilafat movement collapsed with the rise of Atatürk in Turkey. Muslim leaders left the Congress and began forming Muslim organisations. The political base behind Gandhi had broken into factions. He was released in February 1924 for an appendicitis operation, having served only two years.[122][123]

Salt Satyagraha (Salt March/Civil Disobedience Movement)

[edit]
Original footage of Gandhi and his followers marching to Dandi in the Salt Satyagraha

After his early release from prison for political crimes in 1924, Gandhi continued to pursue swaraj over the second half of the 1920s. He pushed through a resolution at the Calcutta Congress in December 1928 calling on the British government to grant India dominion status or face a new campaign of non-cooperation with complete independence for the country as its goal.[124] After Gandhi's support for World War I with Indian combat troops, and the failure of Khilafat Movement in preserving the rule of Caliph in Turkey, followed by a collapse in Muslim support for his leadership, some such as Subhas Chandra Bose and Bhagat Singh questioned his values and non-violent approach.[101][125] While many Hindu leaders championed a demand for immediate independence, Gandhi revised his own call to a one-year wait, instead of two.[124]

The British did not respond favourably to Gandhi's proposal. British political leaders such as Lord Birkenhead and Winston Churchill announced opposition to "the appeasers of Gandhi" in their discussions with European diplomats who sympathised with Indian demands.[126] On 31 December 1929, an Indian flag was unfurled in Lahore. Gandhi led Congress in a celebration on 26 January 1930 of India's Independence Day in Lahore. This day was commemorated by almost every other Indian organisation. Gandhi then launched a new Satyagraha against the British salt tax in March 1930. He sent an ultimatum in the form of a letter personally addressed to Lord Irwin, the viceroy of India, on 2 March. Gandhi condemned British rule in the letter, describing it as "a curse" that "has impoverished the dumb millions by a system of progressive exploitation and by a ruinously expensive military and civil administration... It has reduced us politically to serfdom." Gandhi also mentioned in the letter that the viceroy received a salary "over five thousand times India's average income." In the letter, Gandhi also stressed his continued adherence to non-violent forms of protest.[127]

This was highlighted by the Salt March to Dandi from 12 March to 6 April, where, together with 78 volunteers, Gandhi marched 388 kilometres (241 mi) from Ahmedabad to Dandi, Gujarat to make salt himself, with the declared intention of breaking the salt laws. The march took 25 days to cover 240 miles with Gandhi speaking to often huge crowds along the way. Thousands of Indians joined him in Dandi.

According to Sarma, Gandhi recruited women to participate in the salt tax campaigns and the boycott of foreign products, which gave many women a new self-confidence and dignity in the mainstream of Indian public life.[128] However, other scholars such as Marilyn French state that Gandhi barred women from joining his civil disobedience movement because Gandhi feared he would be accused of using women as a political shield.[129] When women insisted on joining the movement and participating in public demonstrations, Gandhi asked the volunteers to get permissions of their guardians and only those women who can arrange child-care should join him.[130] Regardless of Gandhi's apprehensions and views, Indian women joined the Salt March by the thousands to defy the British salt taxes and monopoly on salt mining. On 5 May, Gandhi was interned under a regulation dating from 1827 in anticipation of a protest that he had planned. The protest at Dharasana salt works on 21 May went ahead without Gandhi. A horrified American journalist, Webb Miller, described the British response thus:

In complete silence the Gandhi men drew up and halted a hundred yards from the stockade. A picked column advanced from the crowd, waded the ditches and approached the barbed wire stockade... at a word of command, scores of native policemen rushed upon the advancing marchers and rained blows on their heads with their steel-shot lathis [long bamboo sticks]. Not one of the marchers even raised an arm to fend off blows. They went down like ninepins. From where I stood I heard the sickening whack of the clubs on unprotected skulls... Those struck down fell sprawling, unconscious or writhing with fractured skulls or broken shoulders.[131]

This went on for hours until some 300 or more protesters had been beaten, many seriously injured and two killed. At no time did they offer any resistance. After Gandhi's arrest, the women marched and picketed shops on their own, accepting violence and verbal abuse from British authorities for the cause in the manner Gandhi inspired.[129]

This campaign was one of Gandhi's most successful at upsetting the British hold on India; Britain responded by imprisoning over 60,000 people.[132] However, Congress estimates put the figure at 90,000. Among them was one of Gandhi's lieutenants, Jawaharlal Nehru.

Gandhi as folk hero

[edit]
Indian workers on strike in support of Gandhi in 1930

Indian Congress in the 1920s appealed to Andhra Pradesh peasants by creating Telugu language plays that combined Indian mythology and legends, linked them to Gandhi's ideas, and portrayed Gandhi as a messiah, a reincarnation of ancient and medieval Indian nationalist leaders and saints. The plays built support among peasants steeped in traditional Hindu culture, according to Murali, and this effort made Gandhi a folk hero in Telugu speaking villages, a sacred messiah-like figure.[133]

According to Dennis Dalton, it was Gandhi's ideas that were responsible for his wide following. Gandhi criticised Western civilisation as one driven by "brute force and immorality", contrasting it with his categorisation of Indian civilisation as one driven by "soul force and morality".[134] Gandhi captured the imagination of the people of his heritage with his ideas about winning "hate with love". These ideas are evidenced in his pamphlets from the 1890s, in South Africa, where too Gandhi was popular among the Indian indentured workers. After he returned to India, people flocked to Gandhi because he reflected their values.[134]

Gandhi's first visit to Odisha in 1921, a general meeting held at the riverbed of Kathajodi

Gandhi also campaigned hard going from one rural corner of the Indian subcontinent to another. He used terminology and phrases such as Rama-rajya from Ramayana, Prahlada as a paradigmatic icon, and such cultural symbols as another facet of swaraj and satyagraha.[135] During Gandhi's lifetime, these ideas sounded strange outside India, but they readily and deeply resonated with the culture and historic values of his people.[134][136]

Negotiations

[edit]

The government, represented by Lord Irwin, the Viceroy of India, decided to negotiate with Gandhi. The Gandhi–Irwin Pact was signed in March 1931. The British Government agreed to free all political prisoners, in return for the suspension of the civil disobedience movement. According to the pact, Gandhi was invited to attend the Round Table Conference in London for discussions and as the sole representative of the Indian National Congress. The conference was a disappointment to Gandhi and the nationalists. Gandhi expected to discuss India's independence, while the British side focused on the Indian princes and Indian minorities rather than on a transfer of power. Lord Irwin's successor, Lord Willingdon, took a hard line against India as an independent nation, began a new campaign of controlling and subduing the nationalist movement. Gandhi was again arrested, and the government tried and failed to negate his influence by completely isolating him from his followers.[137]

In Britain, Winston Churchill, a prominent Conservative politician who was then out of office but later became its prime minister, became a vigorous and articulate critic of Gandhi and opponent of his long-term plans. Churchill often ridiculed Gandhi, saying in a widely reported 1931 speech:

It is alarming and also nauseating to see Mr Gandhi, a seditious Middle Temple lawyer, now posing as a fakir of a type well known in the East, striding half-naked up the steps of the Vice-regal palace....to parley on equal terms with the representative of the King-Emperor.[138]

Churchill's bitterness against Gandhi grew in the 1930s. He called Gandhi as the one who was "seditious in aim" whose evil genius and multiform menace was attacking the British empire. Churchill called him a dictator, a "Hindu Mussolini", fomenting a race war, trying to replace the Raj with Brahmin cronies, playing on the ignorance of Indian masses, all for selfish gain.[139] Churchill attempted to isolate Gandhi, and his criticism of Gandhi was widely covered by European and American press. It gained Churchill sympathetic support, but it also increased support for Gandhi among Europeans. The developments heightened Churchill's anxiety that the "British themselves would give up out of pacifism and misplaced conscience."[139]

Round Table Conferences

[edit]
Gandhi and his personal assistant Mahadev Desai at Birla House, 1939

During the discussions between Gandhi and the British government over 1931–32 at the Round Table Conferences, Gandhi, now aged about 62, sought constitutional reforms as a preparation to the end of colonial British rule, and begin the self-rule by Indians.[140] The British side sought reforms that would keep the Indian subcontinent as a colony. The British negotiators proposed constitutional reforms on a British Dominion model that established separate electorates based on religious and social divisions. The British questioned the Congress party and Gandhi's authority to speak for all of India.[141] They invited Indian religious leaders, such as Muslims and Sikhs, to press their demands along religious lines, as well as B. R. Ambedkar as the representative leader of the untouchables.[140] Gandhi vehemently opposed a constitution that enshrined rights or representations based on communal divisions, because he feared that it would not bring people together but divide them, perpetuate their status, and divert the attention from India's struggle to end the colonial rule.[142][143]

The Second Round Table conference was the only time Gandhi left India between 1914 and his death in 1948. He was accompanied by his secretary Mahadev Desai, son Devdas Gandhi and British supporter Mirabehn.[144] Gandhi declined the government's offer of accommodation in an expensive West End hotel, preferring to stay in the East End, to live among working-class people, as he did in India.[145] Gandhi based himself in a small cell-bedroom at his friend Muriel Lester's "People's House" at Kingsley Hall for the three-month duration of his stay.[146] He was enthusiastically received by East Enders.[147] Local children gave him toys for his birthday and Lester noted that he would gently place them on window sills and in carriages during his stay and took them back to India.[144] During this time, Gandhi also renewed his links with the British vegetarian movement.

An admiring East End crowd gathers to witness the arrival of Mahatma Gandhi, 1931

After Gandhi returned from the Second Round Table conference, he started a new satyagraha. Gandhi was arrested and imprisoned at the Yerwada Jail, Pune. While he was in prison, the British government enacted a new law that granted untouchables a separate electorate. It came to be known as the Communal Award.[148] In protest, Gandhi started a fast-unto-death, while he was held in prison.[149] The resulting public outcry forced the government, in consultations with Ambedkar, to replace the Communal Award with a compromise Poona Pact.[150][151]

Congress politics

[edit]

In 1934, Gandhi resigned from Congress party membership. He did not disagree with the party's position, but felt that if he resigned, Gandhi's popularity with Indians would cease to stifle the party's membership, which actually varied, including communists, socialists, trade unionists, students, religious conservatives, and those with pro-business convictions, and that these various voices would get a chance to make themselves heard. Gandhi also wanted to avoid being a target for Raj propaganda by leading a party that had temporarily accepted political accommodation with the Raj.[152]

In 1936, Gandhi returned to active politics again with the Nehru presidency and the Lucknow session of the Congress. Although Gandhi wanted a total focus on the task of winning independence and not speculation about India's future, he did not restrain the Congress from adopting socialism as its goal. Gandhi had a clash with Subhas Chandra Bose, who had been elected president in 1938, and who had previously expressed a lack of faith in nonviolence as a means of protest.[153] Despite Gandhi's opposition, Bose won a second term as Congress President, against Gandhi's nominee, Bhogaraju Pattabhi Sitaramayya. Gandhi declared that Sitaramayya's defeat was his defeat.[154] Bose later left the Congress when the All-India leaders resigned en masse in protest of his abandonment of the principles introduced by Gandhi.[155][156]

World War II and Quit India movement

[edit]
Gandhi talking with Jawaharlal Nehru, his designated political heir, during the drafting of the Quit India Resolution in Bombay, August 1942

Gandhi opposed providing any help to the British war effort and he campaigned against any Indian participation in World War II.[157] The British government responded with the arrests of Gandhi and many other Congress leaders and killed over 1,000 Indians who participated in this movement.[158] A number of violent attacks were also carried out by the nationalists against the British government.[159] While Gandhi's campaign did not enjoy the support of a number of Indian leaders, and over 2.5 million Indians volunteered and joined the British military to fight on various fronts of the Allied Forces, the movement played a role in weakening the control over the South Asian region by the British regime and it ultimately paved the way for Indian independence.[157][159]

Gandhi's opposition to the Indian participation in World War II was motivated by his belief that India could not be party to a war ostensibly being fought for democratic freedom while that freedom was denied to India itself.[160] Gandhi also condemned Nazism and Fascism, a view which won endorsement of other Indian leaders. As the war progressed, Gandhi intensified his demand for independence, calling for the British to Quit India in a 1942 speech in Mumbai.[161] This was Gandhi's and the Congress Party's most definitive revolt aimed at securing the British exit from India.[162] The British government responded quickly to the Quit India speech, and within hours after Gandhi's speech arrested Gandhi and all the members of the Congress Working Committee.[163] His countrymen retaliated the arrests by damaging or burning down hundreds of government owned railway stations, police stations, and cutting down telegraph wires.[164]

In 1942, Gandhi now nearing age 73, urged his people to completely stop co-operating with the imperial government. In this effort, Gandhi urged that they neither kill nor injure British people but be willing to suffer and die if violence is initiated by the British officials.[161] He clarified that the movement would not be stopped because of any individual acts of violence, saying that the "ordered anarchy" of "the present system of administration" was "worse than real anarchy."[165][166] Gandhi urged Indians to karo ya maro ("do or die") in the cause of their rights and freedoms.[161][167]

Gandhi in 1942, the year he launched the Quit India Movement

Gandhi's arrest lasted two years, as he was held in the Aga Khan Palace in Pune. During this period, Gandhi's longtime secretary Mahadev Desai died of a heart attack, his wife Kasturba died after 18 months' imprisonment on 22 February 1944, and Gandhi suffered a severe malaria attack.[164] While in jail, he agreed to an interview with Stuart Gelder, a British journalist. Gelder then composed and released an interview summary, cabled it to the mainstream press, that announced sudden concessions Gandhi was willing to make, comments that shocked his countrymen, the Congress workers and even Gandhi. The latter two claimed that it distorted what Gandhi actually said on a range of topics and falsely repudiated the Quit India movement.[164]

Gandhi was released before the end of the war on 6 May 1944 because of his failing health and necessary surgery; the Raj did not want him to die in prison and enrage the nation. Gandhi came out of detention to an altered political scene – the Muslim League for example, which a few years earlier had appeared marginal, "now occupied the centre of the political stage"[168] and the topic of Jinnah's campaign for Pakistan was a major talking point. Gandhi and Jinnah had extensive correspondence and the two men met several times over a period of two weeks in September 1944 at Jinnah's house in Bombay, where Gandhi insisted on a united religiously plural and independent India which included Muslims and non-Muslims of the Indian subcontinent coexisting. Jinnah rejected this proposal and insisted instead for partitioning the subcontinent on religious lines to create a separate Muslim homeland (later Pakistan).[169] These discussions continued through 1947.[170]

While the leaders of Congress languished in jail, the other parties supported the war and gained organisational strength. Underground publications flailed at the ruthless suppression of Congress, but it had little control over events.[171] At the end of the war, the British gave clear indications that power would be transferred to Indian hands. At this point, Gandhi called off the struggle, and around 100,000 political prisoners were released, including the Congress's leadership.[172]

Partition and independence

[edit]
Gandhi with Muhammad Ali Jinnah in September 1944
Gandhi with Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy (left) and Sheikh Mujibur Rahman (far right) during Noakhali riots in October 1946

Gandhi opposed the partition of the Indian subcontinent along religious lines.[169][173][174] The Indian National Congress and Gandhi called for the British to Quit India. However, the All-India Muslim League demanded "Divide and Quit India."[175][176] Gandhi suggested an agreement which required the Congress and the Muslim League to co-operate and attain independence under a provisional government, thereafter, the question of partition could be resolved by a plebiscite in the districts with a Muslim majority.[177]

Jinnah rejected Gandhi's proposal and called for Direct Action Day, on 16 August 1946, to press Muslims to publicly gather in cities and support his proposal for the partition of the Indian subcontinent into a Muslim state and non-Muslim state. Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy, the Muslim League Chief Minister of Bengal – now Bangladesh and West Bengal (excluding Cooch Behar), gave Calcutta's police special holiday to celebrate the Direct Action Day.[178] The Direct Action Day triggered a mass murder of Calcutta Hindus and the torching of their property, and holidaying police were missing to contain or stop the conflict.[179] The British government did not order its army to move in to contain the violence.[178] The violence on Direct Action Day led to retaliatory violence against Muslims across India. Thousands of Hindus and Muslims were murdered, and tens of thousands were injured in the cycle of violence in the days that followed.[180] Gandhi visited the most riot-prone areas to appeal a stop to the massacres.[179]

Gandhi (center) in 1947, with Louis Mountbatten, Britain's last Viceroy of India, and his wife Edwina Mountbatten

Archibald Wavell, the Viceroy and Governor-General of British India for three years through February 1947, had worked with Gandhi and Jinnah to find a common ground, before and after accepting Indian independence in principle. Wavell condemned Gandhi's character and motives as well as his ideas. Wavell accused Gandhi of harbouring the single-minded idea to "overthrow British rule and influence and to establish a Hindu raj", and called Gandhi a "malignant, malevolent, exceedingly shrewd" politician.[181] Wavell feared a civil war on the Indian subcontinent, and doubted Gandhi would be able to stop it.[181]

The British reluctantly agreed to grant independence to the people of the Indian subcontinent, but accepted Jinnah's proposal of partitioning the land into Pakistan and India. Gandhi was involved in the final negotiations, but Stanley Wolpert states the "plan to carve up British India was never approved of or accepted by Gandhi".[182]

The partition was controversial and violently disputed. More than half a million were killed in religious riots as 10 million to 12 million non-Muslims (Hindus and Sikhs mostly) migrated from Pakistan into India, and Muslims migrated from India into Pakistan, across the newly created borders of India, West Pakistan and East Pakistan.[183]

Gandhi spent the day of independence not celebrating the end of the British rule, but appealing for peace among his countrymen by fasting and spinning in Calcutta on 15 August 1947. The partition had gripped the Indian subcontinent with religious violence and the streets were filled with corpses.[184] Gandhi's fasting and protests are credited for stopping the religious riots and communal violence. His final fast took place from 13–18 January 1948, just days before his assassination.[181][185][186][187][188][189][190][191][192]

Death

[edit]
Sushila Yawalkar painting Gandhi in the year of his death

At 5:17 p.m. on 30 January 1948, Gandhi was with his grandnieces in the garden of Birla House (now Gandhi Smriti), on his way to address a prayer meeting, when Nathuram Godse, a Hindu nationalist, fired three bullets into Gandhi's chest from a pistol at close range.[193][194] According to some accounts, Gandhi died instantly.[195][196] In other accounts, such as one prepared by an eyewitness journalist, he was carried into the Birla House, into a bedroom. There, he died about 30 minutes later as a family member read verses from Hindu scriptures.[197][198][199][200][185]

Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru addressed his countrymen over the All-India Radio saying:[201]

Friends and comrades, the light has gone out of our lives, and there is darkness everywhere, and I do not quite know what to tell you or how to say it. Our beloved leader, Bapu as we called him, the father of the nation, is no more. Perhaps I am wrong to say that; nevertheless, we will not see him again, as we have seen him for these many years, we will not run to him for advice or seek solace from him, and that is a terrible blow, not only for me, but for millions and millions in this country.[202]

Memorial at the location of Gandhi's assassination in 1948. His stylised footsteps lead to the memorial.

Godse, a Hindu nationalist,[203][194][204] with links to the Hindu Mahasabha and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh,[205][206][207][208][185] made no attempt to escape; several other conspirators were soon arrested as well. The accused were Nathuram Vinayak Godse, Narayan Apte, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, Shankar Kistayya, Dattatraya Parchure, Vishnu Karkare, Madanlal Pahwa, and Gopal Godse.[185][208][209][210][211][212]

The trial began on 27 May 1948 and ran for eight months before Justice Atma Charan passed his final order on 10 February 1949. The prosecution called 149 witnesses, the defence none.[213] The court found all of the defendants except one guilty as charged. Eight men were convicted for the murder conspiracy, and others were convicted for violation of the Explosive Substances Act. Savarkar was acquitted and set free. Nathuram Godse and Narayan Apte were sentenced to death by hanging[214] while the remaining six (including Godse's brother, Gopal) were sentenced to life imprisonment.[215]

Funeral and memorials

[edit]
Gandhi's funeral was marked by millions of Indians.[216]

Gandhi's death was mourned nationwide.[198][199][200][185] Over a million people joined the five-mile-long funeral procession that took over five hours to reach Raj Ghat from Birla house, where Gandhi was assassinated, and another million watched the procession pass by.[216] His body was transported on a weapons carrier, whose chassis was dismantled overnight to allow a high-floor to be installed so that people could catch a glimpse of Gandhi's body. The engine of the vehicle was not used; instead, four drag-ropes held by 50 people each pulled the vehicle.[217] All Indian-owned establishments in London remained closed in mourning as thousands of people from all faiths and denominations and Indians from all over Britain converged at India House in London.[218]

Cremation of Mahatma Gandhi at Rajghat, 31 January 1948. It was attended by Jawaharlal Nehru, Louis and Edwina Mountbatten, Maulana Azad, Rajkumari Amrit Kaur, Sarojini Naidu and other national leaders. His son Devdas Gandhi lit the pyre.[219]

Gandhi was cremated in accordance with Hindu tradition. His ashes were poured into urns which were sent across India for memorial services.[220] Most of the ashes were immersed at the Sangam at Allahabad on 12 February 1948, but some were secretly taken away. In 1997, Tushar Gandhi immersed the contents of one urn, found in a bank vault and reclaimed through the courts, at the Sangam at Allahabad.[221][222] Some of Gandhi's ashes were scattered at the source of the Nile River near Jinja, Uganda, and a memorial plaque marks the event. On 30 January 2008, the contents of another urn were immersed at Girgaum Chowpatty. Another urn is at the palace of the Aga Khan in Pune (where Gandhi was held as a political prisoner from 1942 to 1944[223][224]) and another in the Self-Realization Fellowship Lake Shrine in Los Angeles.[221][225][226]

The Birla House site where Gandhi was assassinated is now a memorial called Gandhi Smriti. The place near Yamuna River where he was cremated is the Rāj Ghāt memorial in New Delhi.[227] A black marble platform, it bears the epigraph "Hē Rāma" (Devanagari: हे ! राम or, Hey Raam). These are said to be Gandhi's last words after he was shot.[228]

Principles, practices, and beliefs

[edit]

Gandhi's spirituality was greatly based on his embracement of the five great vows of Jainism and Hindu Yoga philosophy, viz. Satya (truth), ahimsa (nonviolence), brahmacharya (celibacy), asteya (non-stealing), and aparigraha (non-attachment).[229] He stated that "Unless you impose on yourselves the five vows you may not embark on the experiment at all."[229] Gandhi's statements, letters and life have attracted much political and scholarly analysis of his principles, practices and beliefs, including what influenced him. Some writers present Gandhi as a paragon of ethical living and pacifism, while others present him as a more complex, contradictory and evolving character influenced by his culture and circumstances.[230][231]

Truth and Satyagraha

[edit]
Plaque displaying one of Gandhi's quotes on rumour

Gandhi dedicated his life to discovering and pursuing truth, or Satya, and called his movement satyagraha, which means "appeal to, insistence on, or reliance on the Truth."[232] The first formulation of the satyagraha as a political movement and principle occurred in 1920, which Gandhi tabled as "Resolution on Non-cooperation" in September that year before a session of the Indian Congress. It was the satyagraha formulation and step, states Dennis Dalton, that deeply resonated with beliefs and culture of his people, embedded him into the popular consciousness, transforming him quickly into Mahatma.[233]

"God is Тruth. The way to Тruth lies through ahimsa (nonviolence)" – Sabarmati, 13 March 1927

Gandhi based Satyagraha on the Vedantic ideal of self-realisation, ahimsa (nonviolence), vegetarianism, and universal love. William Borman states that the key to his satyagraha is rooted in the Hindu Upanishadic texts.[234] According to Indira Carr, Gandhi's ideas on ahimsa and satyagraha were founded on the philosophical foundations of Advaita Vedanta.[235] I. Bruce Watson states that some of these ideas are found not only in traditions within Hinduism, but also in Jainism or Buddhism, particularly those about non-violence, vegetarianism and universal love, but Gandhi's synthesis was to politicise these ideas.[236] His concept of satya as a civil movement, states Glyn Richards, are best understood in the context of the Hindu terminology of Dharma and Ṛta.[237]

Gandhi stated that the most important battle to fight was overcoming his own demons, fears, and insecurities. Gandhi summarised his beliefs first when he said, "God is Truth." Gandhi would later change this statement to "Truth is God." Thus, satya (truth) in Gandhi's philosophy is "God".[238] Gandhi, states Richards, described the term "God" not as a separate power, but as the Being (Brahman, Atman) of the Advaita Vedanta tradition, a nondual universal that pervades in all things, in each person and all life.[237] According to Nicholas Gier, this to Gandhi meant the unity of God and humans, that all beings have the same one soul and therefore equality, that atman exists and is same as everything in the universe, ahimsa (non-violence) is the very nature of this atman.[239]

Gandhi picking salt during Salt Satyagraha to defy colonial law giving salt collection monopoly to the British.[240] His satyagraha attracted vast numbers of Indian men and women.[241]

The essence of Satyagraha is "soul force" as a political means, refusing to use brute force against the oppressor, seeking to eliminate antagonisms between the oppressor and the oppressed, aiming to transform or "purify" the oppressor. It is not inaction but determined passive resistance and non-co-operation where, states Arthur Herman, "love conquers hate".[242] A euphemism sometimes used for Satyagraha is that it is a "silent force" or a "soul force" (a term also used by Martin Luther King Jr. during his "I Have a Dream" speech). It arms the individual with moral power rather than physical power. Satyagraha is also termed a "universal force", as it essentially "makes no distinction between kinsmen and strangers, young and old, man and woman, friend and foe."[e]

Gandhi wrote: "There must be no impatience, no barbarity, no insolence, no undue pressure. If we want to cultivate a true spirit of democracy, we cannot afford to be intolerant. Intolerance betrays want of faith in one's cause."[246] Civil disobedience and non-co-operation as practised under Satyagraha are based on the "law of suffering",[247] a doctrine that the endurance of suffering is a means to an end. This end usually implies a moral upliftment or progress of an individual or society. Therefore, non-co-operation in Satyagraha is in fact a means to secure the co-operation of the opponent consistently with truth and justice.[248]

While Gandhi's idea of satyagraha as a political means attracted a widespread following among Indians, the support was not universal. For example, Muslim leaders such as Jinnah opposed the satyagraha idea, accused Gandhi to be reviving Hinduism through political activism, and began effort to counter Gandhi with Muslim nationalism and a demand for Muslim homeland.[249][250][251] The untouchability leader Ambedkar, in June 1945, after his decision to convert to Buddhism and the first Law and Justice minister of modern India, dismissed Gandhi's ideas as loved by "blind Hindu devotees", primitive, influenced by spurious brew of Tolstoy and Ruskin, and "there is always some simpleton to preach them".[252][253][254] Winston Churchill caricatured Gandhi as a "cunning huckster" seeking selfish gain, an "aspiring dictator", and an "atavistic spokesman of a pagan Hinduism." Churchill stated that the civil disobedience movement spectacle of Gandhi only increased "the danger to which white people there [British India] are exposed."[255]

Nonviolence

[edit]
Gandhi with textile workers at Darwen, Lancashire, 26 September 1931

Although Gandhi was not the originator of the principle of nonviolence, he was the first to apply it in the political field on a large scale.[256][257] The concept of nonviolence (ahimsa) has a long history in Indian religious thought, and is considered the highest dharma (ethical value/virtue), a precept to be observed towards all living beings (sarvbhuta), at all times (sarvada), in all respects (sarvatha), in action, words and thought.[258] Gandhi explains his philosophy and ideas about ahimsa as a political means in his autobiography The Story of My Experiments with Truth.[259][260][261][262]

Although Gandhi considered non-violence to be "infinitely superior to violence", he preferred violence to cowardice.[263][264] Gandhi added that he "would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor."[264]

Brahmacharya: abstinence from sex and food

[edit]

Along with many other texts, Gandhi studied the Bhagavad Gita while in South Africa.[265] This Hindu scripture discusses jnana yoga, bhakti yoga and karma yoga along with virtues such as non-violence, patience, integrity, lack of hypocrisy, self restraint and abstinence.[266] Gandhi began experiments with these, and in 1906 at age 37, although married and a father, he vowed to abstain from sexual relations.[265]

Gandhi's experiment with abstinence went beyond sex, and extended to food. He consulted the Jain scholar Shrimad Rajchandra, whom he fondly called Raychandbhai.[267] Rajchandra advised him that milk stimulated sexual passion. Gandhi began abstaining from cow's milk in 1912, and did so even when doctors advised him to consume milk.[268][269] According to Sankar Ghose, Tagore described Gandhi as someone who did not abhor sex or women, but considered sexual life as inconsistent with his moral goals.[270]

Gandhi tried to test and prove to himself his brahmacharya. The experiments began some time after the death of his wife in February 1944. At the start of his experiment, he had women sleep in the same room but in different beds. He later slept with women in the same bed, often naked. In April 1945, Gandhi referenced sleeping with several "women or girls" in a letter to Birla as part of the experiments.[271] According to the 1960s memoir of his grandniece Manu, Gandhi feared in early 1947 that he and she may be killed by Muslims in the run-up to India's independence in August 1947, and asked her when she was 18 years old if she wanted to help him with his experiments to test their "purity", for which she readily accepted.[272] Gandhi also shared his bed with 18-year-old Abha, wife of his grandnephew Kanu. Gandhi would sleep with both Manu and Abha at the same time.[272][273] According to Vinay Lal, Gandhi slept naked with Manu and Abha several times, in order to test his celibacy and his will to abstain from committing sexual acts, in order to fulfill the conditions he felt were required in order to become a brahmacharya.

According to Sean Scalmer, Gandhi in his final year of life was an ascetic, and his sickly skeletal figure was caricatured in Western media.[274] In February 1947, he asked his confidants such as Birla and Ramakrishna if it was wrong for him to experiment his brahmacharya oath.[clarification needed][270] Gandhi's public experiments, as they progressed, were widely discussed and criticised by his family members and leading politicians. However, Gandhi said that if he would not let Manu sleep with him, it would be a sign of weakness. Some of his staff resigned, including two of his newspaper's editors who had refused to print some of Gandhi's sermons dealing with his experiments.[272] Nirmalkumar Bose, Gandhi's Bengali interpreter, for example, criticised Gandhi, not because Gandhi did anything wrong, but because Bose was concerned about the psychological effect on the women who participated in his experiments.[273] Veena Howard states Gandhi's views on brahmacharya and religious renunciation experiments were a method to confront women issues in his times.[275]

Gandhi also supported alcohol abstinence, advocating Prohibition as the only effective way to deal with alcohol usage.[276]

Literary works

[edit]
Young India, a weekly journal published by Gandhi from 1919 to 1932

Gandhi was a prolific writer. His signature style was simple, precise, clear and devoid of artificialities.[277] One of Gandhi's earliest publications, Hind Swaraj, published in Gujarati in 1909, became "the intellectual blueprint" for India's independence movement. The book was translated into English the next year, with a copyright legend that read "No Rights Reserved".[278] For decades, Gandhi edited several newspapers including Harijan in Gujarati, in Hindi and in the English language; Indian Opinion while in South Africa and, Young India, in English, and Navajivan, a Gujarati monthly, on his return to India. Later, Navajivan was also published in Hindi. Gandhi also wrote letters almost every day to individuals and newspapers.[279]

Gandhi also wrote several books, including his autobiography, The Story of My Experiments with Truth (Gujarati: સત્યના પ્રયોગો અથવા આત્મકથા), of which Gandhi bought the entire first edition to make sure it was reprinted.[280] His other autobiographies included: Satyagraha in South Africa about his struggle there, Hind Swaraj or Indian Home Rule, a political pamphlet, and a paraphrase in Gujarati of John Ruskin's Unto This Last which was an early critique of political economy.[281] This last essay can be considered his programme on economics. Gandhi also wrote extensively on vegetarianism, diet and health, religion, social reforms, etc. Gandhi usually wrote in Gujarati, though he also revised the Hindi and English translations of his books.[282] In 1934, Gandhi wrote Songs from Prison while prisoned in Yerawada jail in Maharashtra.[283]

Gandhi's complete works were published by the Indian government under the name The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi in the 1960s. The writings comprise about 50,000 pages published in about 100 volumes. In 2000, a revised edition of the complete works sparked a controversy, as it contained a large number of errors and omissions.[284] The Indian government later withdrew the revised edition.[285]

Legacy

[edit]
Indian sculptor Devi Prasad Roy Choudhury with his sculpture of Gandhi

Gandhi is noted as the greatest figure of the successful Indian independence movement against the British rule. He is also hailed as the greatest figure of modern India.[f] American historian Stanley Wolpert described Gandhi as "India's greatest revolutionary nationalist leader" and the greatest Indian since the Buddha.[292] In 1999, Gandhi was named "Asian of the century" by Asiaweek.[293] In a 2000 BBC poll, he was voted as the greatest man of the millennium.[294][295]

The word Mahatma, while often mistaken for Gandhi's given name in the West, is taken from the Sanskrit words maha (meaning Great) and atma (meaning Soul).[296][297] He was publicly bestowed with the honorific title "Mahatma" in July 1914 at farewell meeting in Town Hall, Durban.[298][299] Rabindranath Tagore is said to have accorded the title to Gandhi by 1915.[300][g] In his autobiography, Gandhi nevertheless explains that he never valued the title, and was often pained by it.[303][304][305]

In 1961 the U.S. government issued two commemorative stamps in honour of Mahatma Gandhi.[306]

Innumerable streets, roads, and localities in India are named after Gandhi. These include M.G. Road (the main street of a number of Indian cities including Mumbai, Bangalore, Kolkata, Lucknow, Kanpur, Gangtok and Indore), Gandhi Market (near Sion, Mumbai) and Gandhinagar (the capital of the state of Gujarat, Gandhi's birthplace).[307]

As of 2008, over 150 countries have released stamps on Gandhi.[308] In October 2019, about 87 countries including Turkey, the United States, Russia, Iran, Uzbekistan, and Palestine released commemorative Gandhi stamps on the 150th anniversary of his birth.[309][310][311][312]

Statue of Gandhi, in the Roma Street Parkland, Brisbane, Australia

In 2014, Brisbane's Indian community commissioned a statue of Gandhi, created by Ram V. Sutar and Anil Sutar in the Roma Street Parkland,[313][314] It was unveiled by Narendra Modi, then Prime Minister of India.

Florian asteroid 120461 Gandhi was named in his honour in September 2020.[315] In October 2022, a statue of Gandhi was installed in Astana on the embankment of the rowing canal, opposite the cult monument to the defenders of Kazakhstan.[316]

On 15 December 2022, the United Nations headquarters in New York unveiled the statue of Gandhi. UN Secretary-General António Guterres called Gandhi an "uncompromising advocate for peaceful co-existence."[317]

On 11 April 2025, the Anglo-Boer War Museum in Bloemfontein, South Africa launched a documentary called Caught in the Crossfire: Indian Involvement in the South African War, and unveiled a bust of Gandhi. This was part of the museum's initiatives to acknowledge the role of Indian individuals — soldiers, stretcher-bearers and civilians — who were caught in the conflict between the British and the Boers during the Second Boer War.[318]

Followers and international influence

[edit]

Gandhi influenced important leaders and political movements.[262] Leaders of the civil rights movement in the United States, including Martin Luther King Jr., James Lawson, and James Bevel, drew from the writings of Gandhi in the development of their own theories about nonviolence.[319][320][321] King said, "Christ gave us the goals and Mahatma Gandhi the tactics."[322] King sometimes referred to Gandhi as "the little brown saint."[323] Anti-apartheid activist and former President of South Africa, Nelson Mandela, was inspired by Gandhi.[324] Others include Steve Biko, Václav Havel,[325] and Aung San Suu Kyi.[326]

Bust of Gandhi at York University, Toronto, Canada
Statue of Gandhi in Madrid, Spain
Gandhi at Praça Túlio Fontoura, São Paulo, Brazil

In his early years, the former President of South Africa Nelson Mandela was a follower of the nonviolent resistance philosophy of Gandhi.[324] Bhana and Vahed commented on these events as "Gandhi inspired succeeding generations of South African activists seeking to end White rule. This legacy connects him to Nelson Mandela...in a sense, Mandela completed what Gandhi started."[327]

Gandhi's life and teachings inspired many who specifically referred to Gandhi as their mentor or who dedicated their lives to spreading his ideas. In Europe, Romain Rolland was the first to discuss Gandhi in his 1924 book Mahatma Gandhi, and Brazilian anarchist and feminist Maria Lacerda de Moura wrote about Gandhi in her work on pacifism. In 1931, physicist Albert Einstein exchanged letters with Gandhi and called him "a role model for the generations to come" in a letter writing about him.[328] Einstein said of Gandhi:

Mahatma Gandhi's life achievement stands unique in political history. He has invented a completely new and humane means for the liberation war of an oppressed country, and practised it with greatest energy and devotion. The moral influence he had on the consciously thinking human being of the entire civilised world will probably be much more lasting than it seems in our time with its overestimation of brutal violent forces. Because lasting will only be the work of such statesmen who wake up and strengthen the moral power of their people through their example and educational works. We may all be happy and grateful that destiny gifted us with such an enlightened contemporary, a role model for the generations to come. Generations to come will scarce believe that such a one as this walked the earth in flesh and blood.

Farah Omar, a political activist from Somaliland, visited India in 1930, where he met Gandhi and was influenced by Gandhi's non-violent philosophy, which he adopted in his campaign in British Somaliland.[329]

Lanza del Vasto went to India in 1936 intending to live with Gandhi; he later returned to Europe to spread Gandhi's philosophy and founded the Community of the Ark in 1948 (modelled after Gandhi's ashrams). Madeleine Slade (known as "Mirabehn") was the daughter of a British admiral who spent much of her adult life in India as a devotee of Gandhi.[330][331]

In addition, the British musician John Lennon referred to Gandhi when discussing his views on nonviolence.[332] In 2007, former US Vice-President and environmentalist Al Gore drew upon Gandhi's idea of satyagraha in a speech on climate change.[333] 44th President of the United States Barack Obama said in September 2009 that his biggest inspiration came from Gandhi. His reply was in response to the question: "Who was the one person, dead or live, that you would choose to dine with?" Obama added, "He's somebody I find a lot of inspiration in. He inspired Dr. King with his message of nonviolence. He ended up doing so much and changed the world just by the power of his ethics."[334]

Time magazine named The 14th Dalai Lama, Lech Wałęsa, Martin Luther King Jr., Cesar Chavez, Aung San Suu Kyi, Benigno Aquino Jr., Desmond Tutu, and Nelson Mandela as Children of Gandhi and his spiritual heirs to nonviolence.[335] The Mahatma Gandhi District in Houston, Texas, United States, an ethnic Indian enclave, is officially named after Gandhi.[336]

Gandhi's ideas had a significant influence on 20th-century philosophy. It began with his engagement with Romain Rolland and Martin Buber. Jean-Luc Nancy said that the French philosopher Maurice Blanchot engaged critically with Gandhi from the point of view of "European spirituality."[337] Since then philosophers including Hannah Arendt, Etienne Balibar and Slavoj Žižek found that Gandhi was a necessary reference to discuss morality in politics. American political scientist Gene Sharp wrote an analytical text, Gandhi as a political strategist, on the significance of Gandhi's ideas, for creating nonviolent social change. Recently, in the light of climate change, Gandhi's views on technology are gaining importance in the fields of environmental philosophy and philosophy of technology.[337]

Global days that celebrate Gandhi

[edit]

In 2007, the United Nations General Assembly declared Gandhi's birthday, 2 October, as "the International Day of Nonviolence".[338] First proposed by UNESCO in 1948, as the School Day of Nonviolence and Peace (DENIP in Spanish),[339] 30 January is observed as the School Day of Nonviolence and Peace in schools of many countries.[340] In countries with a Southern Hemisphere school calendar, it is observed on 30 March.[340]

Awards

[edit]

Time magazine named Gandhi the Man of the Year in 1930.[295] In the same magazine's 1999 list of The Most Important People of the Century, Gandhi was second only to Albert Einstein, who had called Gandhi "the greatest man of our age."[341] The University of Nagpur awarded him an LL.D. in 1937.[342] The Government of India awarded the annual Gandhi Peace Prize to distinguished social workers, world leaders and citizens. Nelson Mandela, the leader of South Africa's struggle to eradicate racial discrimination and segregation, was a prominent non-Indian recipient. In 2003, Gandhi was posthumously awarded with the World Peace Prize.[343] Two years later, he was posthumously awarded with the Order of the Companions of O. R. Tambo.[344] In 2011, Gandhi topped the Time's list of Top 25 Political Icons of All Time.[345]

Gandhi did not receive the Nobel Peace Prize, although he was nominated five times between 1937 and 1948, including the first-ever nomination by the American Friends Service Committee,[346] though Gandhi made the short list only twice, in 1937 and 1947.[347] Decades later, the Nobel Committee publicly declared its regret for the omission and admitted to deeply divided nationalistic opinion denying the award.[347] Gandhi was nominated in 1948 but was assassinated before nominations closed. That year, the committee chose not to award the peace prize stating that "there was no suitable living candidate", and later research shows that the possibility of awarding the prize posthumously to Gandhi was discussed and that the reference to no suitable living candidate was to Gandhi.[347] Geir Lundestad, Secretary of Norwegian Nobel Committee in 2006 said, "The greatest omission in our 106-year history is undoubtedly that Mahatma Gandhi never received the Nobel Peace Prize. Gandhi could do without the Nobel Peace Prize, whether Nobel committee can do without Gandhi is the question."[348] When the 14th Dalai Lama was awarded the Prize in 1989, the chairman of the committee said that this was "in part a tribute to the memory of Mahatma Gandhi."[347] In the summer of 1995, the North American Vegetarian Society inducted Gandhi posthumously into the Vegetarian Hall of Fame.[349]

Father of the Nation

[edit]

Indians widely describe Gandhi as the Father of the Nation.[350][351][352][353][354][355] Origin of this title is traced back to a radio address (on Singapore radio) on 6 July 1944 by Subhash Chandra Bose where Bose addressed Gandhi as "The Father of the Nation".[356] On 28 April 1947, Sarojini Naidu during a conference also referred Gandhi as "Father of the Nation".[357][358] He is also conferred the title "Bapu"[353] (Gujarati: endearment for father,[354] papa[354][355]).

Film, theatre, and literature

[edit]
Gandhi on the front of the current 500 Rupee note. He is also depicted on other Indian Rupee banknotes.
Gandhi on the front of the current 500 Rupee note

21st-century impact within India

[edit]
The Gandhi Mandapam, a temple in Kanyakumari, was erected in honour of Gandhi.

India, with its rapid economic modernisation and urbanisation, has rejected Gandhi's economics[377] but accepted much of his politics and continues to revere his memory. Reporter Jim Yardley notes that "modern India is hardly a Gandhian nation, if it ever was one. His vision of a village-dominated economy was shunted aside during his lifetime as rural romanticism, and his call for a national ethos of personal austerity and nonviolence has proved antithetical to the goals of an aspiring economic and military power." By contrast, Gandhi is "given full credit for India's political identity as a tolerant, secular democracy."[378]

Gandhi's birthday, 2 October, is a national holiday in India, Gandhi Jayanti. His image also appears on paper currency of all denominations issued by Reserve Bank of India, except for the one rupee note.[379] Gandhi's date of death, 30 January, is commemorated as a Martyrs' Day in India.[380]

There are three temples in India dedicated to Gandhi.[381] One is located at Sambalpur in Odisha, the second at Nidaghatta village near Kadur in Chikmagalur district of Karnataka, and the third at Chityal in the district of Nalgonda, Telangana.[381][382] The Gandhi Memorial in Kanyakumari resembles central Indian Hindu temples and the Tamukkam or Summer Palace in Madurai now houses the Mahatma Gandhi Museum.[383]

Descendants

[edit]
Family tree of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and Kasturba Gandhi

Gandhi's children and grandchildren live in India and other countries. Grandson Rajmohan Gandhi is a professor in Illinois and an author of Gandhi's biography titled Mohandas,[384] while another, Tarun Gandhi, has authored several authoritative books on his grandfather. Another grandson, Kanu Ramdas Gandhi (the son of Gandhi's third son Ramdas), was found living at an old age home in Delhi despite having taught earlier in the United States.[385][386]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

General and cited references

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, commonly known as Mahatma Gandhi (2 October 1869 – 30 January 1948), was born in Porbandar, Gujarat, to a Hindu family. He trained as a lawyer in London (1888–1891), returned to India, before moving to South Africa in 1893. There, experiences of racial discrimination prompted his initial political engagement and, over the subsequent years, led to the development of Satyagraha, his philosophy of non-violent resistance, around 1906. Gandhi and his followers employed Satyagraha to oppose discriminatory laws in South Africa.[1][2] He led India's independence movement against British colonial rule, culminating in independence in 1947.[1] Gandhi's leadership in India's independence movement included organizing mass campaigns such as the 1919–1922 Non-Cooperation Movement, the 1930 Salt March civil disobedience against the salt tax, and the 1942 Quit India Movement, which galvanized widespread participation and eroded British authority, culminating in independence in 1947 amid partition of India into present-day India and modern-day Pakistan.[3] His emphasis on self-reliance through practices like hand-spinning khadi cloth and village reconstruction aimed to foster economic independence and moral discipline, though these efforts coexisted with his qualified support for defensive violence and recruitment of Indians into British forces during the Boer War (1899–1902) and World War I (1914–1918), viewing such loyalty as a means to secure political concessions.[4][5] While Gandhi's methods influenced global figures in civil rights struggles, his early South African writings reveal distinctions between Indians and black Africans, employing terms like "Kaffirs" derogatorily and advocating separate treatment for Indians from both whites and indigenous blacks, reflecting hierarchical racial attitudes that evolved partially but persisted in prioritizing Indian interests.[6] Controversies also encompass his opposition to industrialization, rigid stances on caste reform that tolerated untouchability initially, and personal ascetic experiments, including shared sleeping arrangements with young women to test celibacy vows.[7] Gandhi was assassinated on 30 January 1948 by Nathuram Godse, a Hindu nationalist who accused him of appeasing Muslims during partition violence.[2] His legacy endures as a symbol of principled resistance, tempered by empirical scrutiny of his pragmatic inconsistencies and cultural conservatism.[8]

Early Life and Education

Family Background and Childhood (1869-1888)

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was born on October 2, 1869, in Porbandar, a coastal town in the princely state of Gujarat, India, to Karamchand Uttamchand Gandhi and Putlibai Gandhi.[9] His family belonged to the Modh Bania subcaste of Vaishya varna, traditionally involved in trade and commerce.[10] Karamchand Gandhi served as the diwan, or chief minister, of Porbandar state, a position he held with administrative competence despite occasional political tensions with the local ruler.[11] Described as truthful, brave, and generous yet short-tempered, Karamchand exhibited religious liberalism, maintaining friendships across Hindu, Muslim, and Parsi communities.[11][12] Putlibai, Gandhi's mother, came from a Pranami Vaishnava background emphasizing devotion to Vishnu and influenced by syncretic Hindu-Muslim elements; she was deeply pious, observing rigorous fasts such as Ekadashi and vows like the Kokila Vrat, often restricting meals and enduring austerities until ritual fulfillment.[13] Her practices instilled in young Mohandas a commitment to vegetarianism, nonviolence, and self-discipline, reinforced by frequent visits from Jain monks who expounded ahimsa and asceticism in the household.[14][13] Gandhi later recalled the household's eclectic religious atmosphere, blending Vaishnavism's bhakti with Jain ethical rigor, shaping his early aversion to meat and intoxicants despite peer pressures. As the youngest of four siblings—preceded by sister Raliatbehn, half-brother Laxmidas (from Karamchand's prior marriage), and full brother Karsandas—Mohandas grew up in relative privilege tied to his father's status, though the family faced instability when Karamchand lost his diwan post in Porbandar around 1876, prompting a move to Rajkot, where they resided in Kaba Gandhi No Delo, the house built by his father Karamchand (also known as Kaba Gandhi), which is now preserved as a museum showcasing artifacts from Gandhi's early life.[15][16] In Rajkot, he attended primary school from 1876, where he was noted as small, dark-complexioned, timid, and mediocre in studies, preferring play and showing early traits of honesty, such as confessing minor thefts of gold and cigarettes to his father.[9][17] These experiences, including remorseful pledges of truthfulness, foreshadowed his lifelong emphasis on moral integrity over scholastic achievement.[9] By age 13, family dynamics and local customs marked his transition from childhood, though his formative years remained anchored in parental examples of duty and devotion.[17]

Marriage and Early Influences

Kasturba Gandhi
Kasturba Gandhi, wife of Mahatma Gandhi
In 1882, at the age of 13, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi married 13-year-old Kasturbai Makhanji Kapadia in an arranged marriage facilitated by family elders.[18][19] The union formed part of a triple wedding with his two brothers, motivated by convenience and economic considerations common in the era.[19] Betrothal had taken place earlier, likely around age 7, without Gandhi's conscious involvement.[19] The ceremony featured Hindu rituals including the saptapadi, seven circumambulations symbolizing vows of fidelity, and sharing kansar, a ritual sweet.[19] Gandhi later critiqued child marriage as morally unfounded, though he recalled his youthful eagerness tempered by first-night nervousness.[19] Early marital life involved Gandhi asserting authority over Kasturbai, marked by jealousy that confined her movements and sparked quarrels when she sought autonomy.[20] Passionately attached, he kept her awake with conversation and attempted to teach her literacy, but lust and purdah constraints thwarted progress; he later posited that selfless love could have enabled her education.[20] Mutual silences followed disputes, yet separations—including Gandhi's impending London studies at 18—mitigated intense desires over their initial years apart for more than half the time.[20] Gandhi's formative influences derived from his family's religious milieu in Kathiawar. His mother, Putlibai, exemplified devotion through Vaishnava fasts, temple visits, and pilgrimages infused with Jain asceticism.[21] Father Karamchand, a state diwan, fostered moral exposure via plays like Harishchandra—instilling unyielding truthfulness—and Shravana Pitribhakti Nataka, promoting parental service, which evoked emotional responses in young Gandhi.[22] The household's Vaishnava practices intertwined with Jain emphases on ahimsa, vegetarianism, and ethical rigor, embedding non-violence and integrity early.[23] These elements, alongside familial piety over orthodoxy, primed his lifelong ethical experiments.[21]

Studies in London (1888-1891)

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi departed from Bombay on September 4, 1888, aboard the S.S. Clyde, arriving in London on October 27, 1888, after a voyage of approximately seven weeks.[24][25] At age 19, he aimed to qualify as a barrister to support his family's aspirations for legal practice in India.[26] He initially resided in rented accommodations, including 20 Baron's Court Road by November 1888, while adapting to the unfamiliar climate and customs.[27]
Portrait of young Mohandas Gandhi in suit and bow tie
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi as a law student in London, during his studies at the Inner Temple
Gandhi enrolled at the Inner Temple on November 6, 1888, commencing his legal studies focused on keeping terms and passing examinations required for the bar.[25] To prepare academically, he attended classes at University College London, including English literature under Professor Henry Morley from 1888 to 1889.[28] He faced cultural isolation and dietary challenges, having vowed to his mother to abstain from meat, alcohol, and tobacco; vegetarian options were scarce, prompting him to seek out specialized eateries and eventually join the London Vegetarian Society.[29][30] Initially experimenting with Western attire, elocution, and dancing lessons to assimilate, he soon abandoned these as incompatible with his values, prioritizing disciplined study amid London's distractions.[28]
Group photograph including young Mohandas Gandhi seated in suit among others in London
Young Mohandas Gandhi with a group in London, likely associated with the Vegetarian Society during his student years
Through the Vegetarian Society, Gandhi engaged actively, attending meetings, subscribing to its journal, and being elected to its executive committee in September 1890; he also contributed articles and represented it at the Second International Vegetarian Congress that month.[31][32] Encounters with figures like Josiah Oldfield and readings such as Henry Salt's ethical advocacy for vegetarianism broadened his perspective, shifting it from mere religious observance to principled humanitarianism.[29] These interactions provided social connections otherwise elusive due to his shyness and outsider status. After intensive preparation, Gandhi was called to the bar on June 10, 1891, enrolled in the High Court the following day, and departed London on June 12, returning to India as a qualified barrister.[33][34]

South African Period (1893-1914)

Portrait of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi in formal attire
Mohandas Gandhi during his early adulthood
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi arrived in Durban, Natal Colony (present-day South Africa), on 23 May 1893, at the age of 24, to represent the Indian trading firm Dada Abdullah & Sons in a lawsuit against a rival firm in Pretoria.[35][36] The journey exposed him to the systemic racial discrimination enforced against Indians under British colonial rule, where Indians were often categorized alongside Black Africans as inferior and subjected to segregationist policies.[37] On 7 June 1893, while traveling by train from Durban to Pretoria with a valid first-class ticket, Gandhi was forcibly ejected from the first-class compartment at Pietermaritzburg station by a white railway official and a policeman, solely because of his skin color and Indian origin.[38][36][39] Despite protests and offers to buy a third-class ticket, he was ordered to leave the station platform, spending a cold night in the waiting room contemplating returning to India but ultimately resolving to fight the injustice.[36][38] This incident, which Gandhi later described as a transformative humiliation, highlighted the prevalent color bar in public facilities, hotels, and transport, where Indians faced denial of service and legal restrictions.[35][39]
Mohandas Gandhi seated with associates in front of his law office
Gandhi (seated center) outside his attorney office in South Africa
Gandhi successfully argued the case for his client in Pretoria by July 1893, after which he decided to remain in South Africa upon requests from the Indian community for legal assistance amid mounting discriminatory laws.[35][40] He established a legal practice in Durban in 1894, focusing on commercial law for Indian merchants while subordinating professional work to public advocacy.[41] In response to the proposed disenfranchisement of Indians via an 1894 electoral bill, Gandhi organized petitions and mobilized the community, leading to the founding of the Natal Indian Congress on 22 August 1894 as the first political organization to protect Indian rights and foster unity among diverse Indian groups.[42][43][44] The Congress, with Gandhi as secretary, collected over 10,000 signatures against the bill, though it passed with minor amendments, marking the start of his organized resistance against racial laws.[40][44]

Development of Satyagraha Campaigns

Gandhi's development of satyagraha, or non-violent resistance rooted in truth-force, emerged in South Africa amid escalating anti-Indian legislation following the 1902 Anglo-Boer War peace treaty, which granted the Transvaal self-government and empowered its assembly to enact discriminatory laws. Initially termed "passive resistance," the method evolved from Gandhi's earlier organizational efforts, such as founding the Natal Indian Congress in 1894, into a structured campaign emphasizing voluntary suffering, moral vows, and mass participation to appeal to the conscience of oppressors. The catalyst was the Transvaal Asiatic Ordinance of 1906, requiring all Indians over age eight to register, provide fingerprints, and carry certificates, which Gandhi and Indian leaders viewed as dehumanizing.[45][46] On September 11, 1906, at a mass meeting of over 3,000 Indians in Johannesburg's Empire Theatre, Gandhi proposed and led a pledge to defy the ordinance through non-violent non-compliance, courting imprisonment rather than submitting to registration; participants vowed before God to resist until repeal, marking the formal inception of organized satyagraha. Gandhi refined the concept by distinguishing it from mere political tactics, framing it as satyagraha—coined from Sanskrit terms for truth (satya) and insistence (graha)—to underscore soul-force over physical force, drawing on his readings of the Bhagavad Gita and Tolstoy's writings. By early 1907, as resisters faced evictions, deportations, and beatings, Gandhi emphasized purity of means, prohibiting violence even in retaliation, and used his newspaper Indian Opinion to propagate the pledge and sustain morale among participants.[47][48][49] The campaign intensified in 1908 when Gandhi defied a court order to disperse resisters, leading to his arrest on January 10 and a two-month sentence; over 500 Indians followed suit by mid-year, including voluntary certificate burnings on August 16 outside Johannesburg's Hamidia Mosque, where Gandhi and supporters publicly incinerated documents to symbolize rejection of the law. Negotiations with Transvaal officials, including Interior Minister Jan Smuts, yielded temporary truces, such as a 1908 draft ordinance easing some restrictions, but Gandhi suspended the struggle only after verifying concessions, teaching resisters the discipline of conditional non-violence. This phase expanded satyagraha's scope beyond merchants to include professionals and hawkers, with Gandhi establishing voluntary associations for training in self-discipline and communal living at his Phoenix Settlement. In 1910, to further support the satyagraha efforts, Gandhi collaborated with his close friend Hermann Kallenbach, a German-Jewish architect, to establish Tolstoy Farm near Johannesburg using Kallenbach's donated land as a communal settlement for satyagrahi resisters and their families; their partnership involved extensive correspondence documenting the shared commitment to simple living and self-reliance.[50][47][51][52] Subsequent campaigns from 1911 to 1913 targeted invalidation of the 1908 Smuts-Gandhi agreement, which failed to fully repeal restrictions, and addressed the £3 poll tax on ex-indentured Indians, alongside immigration curbs requiring passes. In October 1913, a miners' strike involving 2,000 Indian coal workers in Newcastle escalated into the "Great March," where Gandhi led 2,037 strikers, including 127 women like Valliamma Moodliar who defied gender norms by participating, across 25 miles into Transvaal, resulting in over 1,200 arrests. Gandhi's second imprisonment in January 1914 for nine months highlighted satyagraha's maturation: mass mobilization, women's inclusion, and economic disruption through strikes pressured authorities without arms. The campaigns culminated in the June 1914 Gandhi-Smuts Agreement, recognizing Indian marriages, abolishing the tax, and simplifying registration, though full equality eluded; Gandhi departed South Africa in July 1914, having transformed sporadic protests into a replicable model of principled resistance tested through eight years of intermittent struggle involving thousands.[45][53][54]

Advocacy for Indians and Views on Racial Hierarchy

Upon arriving in South Africa in 1893, Gandhi encountered discriminatory laws targeting Indians, such as restrictions on immigration and trade, prompting him to organize advocacy efforts focused exclusively on Indian rights. In May 1894, he founded the Natal Indian Congress (NIC) to unite Indian merchants, traders, and professionals against racial discrimination in the Natal Colony, including opposition to a proposed franchise bill that sought to disenfranchise Indians by aligning their status with that of native Africans.[55][42] The NIC's goals centered on petitioning colonial authorities for equal treatment under British law, emphasizing Indians' loyalty as British subjects and their economic contributions, while deliberately excluding alliances with the African population.[55]
Mohandas Gandhi as a lawyer in South Africa, 1906
Mohandas Gandhi during his legal career in South Africa, 1906
Gandhi's advocacy intensified with the Transvaal Asiatic Registration Act of 1906, known as the "Black Act," which required Indian residents to register fingerprints and carry passes, a measure he viewed as dehumanizing for Indians. On September 11, 1906, he convened a mass meeting in Johannesburg where over 3,000 Indians took a vow of passive resistance, marking the first organized satyagraha campaign against the law.[56] This nonviolent protest involved deliberate violations of the act, leading to the arrest of Gandhi and hundreds of supporters by 1908, with campaigns continuing until partial concessions were negotiated.[51] Further satyagraha efforts from 1907 to 1914 targeted poll taxes on former indentured laborers and marriage registration restrictions, culminating in the 1913 miners' strike where approximately 2,000 Indian miners, including women, marched across the Natal-Transvaal border without permits to protest the £3 annual tax.[45] These actions pressured authorities into the Gandhi-Smuts Agreement of 1914, which abolished the tax, recognized Hindu and Muslim marriages, and eased some registration requirements for Indians.[54] Throughout these campaigns, Gandhi articulated views positing a racial hierarchy that placed Indians above Africans, whom he frequently referred to derogatorily as "Kaffirs." In a 1893 petition against Indian disenfranchisement, he protested that Indians were being "classed with the natives of South Africa—Kaffir race," arguing for separation to preserve Indian dignity as a more civilized group. Writing in his newspaper Indian Opinion in 1904, Gandhi stated, "About the mixing of the Kaffirs with the Indians, I must confess I feel most strongly," opposing residential integration on grounds of cultural incompatibility.[57] He further contended in 1906 that Indians, as British subjects, should not be equated with "the Kaffir," whom he described as lacking the Indians' level of civilization, thereby seeking exemptions from laws applied to Africans rather than broader equality.[58] In 1907, Gandhi wrote that "Kaffirs are as a rule uncivilized—the convicts even more so," reinforcing a hierarchy where Europeans ranked above Indians, who in turn surpassed Africans in moral and cultural development.[59] These positions, drawn from his early South African writings, prioritized Indian advancement within the colonial framework over solidarity with black South Africans, reflecting a pragmatic strategy to leverage perceived racial gradations against white supremacist policies.[60]

Return to India and Initial Activism (1915-1920)

Reintegration and Rural Surveys

Mahatma Gandhi wearing dhoti and shawl
Mahatma Gandhi in traditional attire after his return from South Africa
Upon his return to Bombay on January 9, 1915, after two decades in South Africa, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi faced the challenge of reintegrating into Indian society, a land he had left as a young man and scarcely knew firsthand.[61] His political mentor, Gopal Krishna Gokhale, had urged him to spend at least a year traveling across India to observe its diverse peoples, landscapes, and social conditions before engaging in active politics, advice Gandhi pledged to follow.[62][63] Gokhale's death on February 19, 1915, shortly after Gandhi's arrival, reinforced this commitment, prompting Gandhi to declare in interviews that he would dedicate time to studying and understanding India rather than immediate agitation.[64][63] To establish a base for this reintegration, Gandhi founded the Satyagraha Ashram on May 25, 1915, in the Kochrab neighborhood of Ahmedabad, Gujarat, with an initial community of about 25 men and women committed to principles of truth, nonviolence, and simple living.[65] The ashram served as a communal experiment in self-sufficiency, emphasizing manual labor, ethical discipline, and removal of untouchability, reflecting Gandhi's intent to model rural regeneration amid urban disconnection.[66] Ahmedabad's tradition of handloom weaving aligned with his emerging focus on village industries, though the settlement faced early challenges, including financial strains and communal tensions, before relocating to the Sabarmati River banks in 1917.[67]
Group of rural Indian children on a vehicle
Rural Indian children in a village setting
From mid-1915 through 1916, Gandhi undertook extensive travels across India, often in third-class railway compartments to immerse himself among ordinary people, covering regions from Bombay to Kolkata, Delhi, Chennai, and even Burma.[68][69] These journeys constituted informal rural surveys, where he documented appalling conditions in villages: widespread poverty, unsanitary environments with open defecation and disease, famine-induced distress, and exploitative landlord-tenant relations that perpetuated indebtedness.[70] In Gujarat and southern India, for instance, he observed how urban elites ignored rural decay, leading him to critique the concentration of Congress activity in cities and advocate for grassroots awakening.[71] His notes and speeches from this period highlighted causal factors like colonial land revenue systems and indigenous neglect of hygiene, shaping his lifelong emphasis on swadeshi (self-reliance) and village-centric reform over mere political swaraj.[72] These observations revealed to Gandhi the stark divide between India's rural majority—comprising over 80% of the population in agrarian distress—and urban nationalist discourse, prompting him to prioritize sanitation drives, cooperative farming ideas, and education in self-governance during ashram sessions and village visits.[70] By late 1916, this reintegration phase had transformed his approach, bridging South African satyagraha tactics with indigenous rural realities, though he refrained from mass mobilization until specific grievances, like those in Champaran, demanded intervention.[68] The period underscored Gandhi's empirical method: direct immersion yielding data on systemic failures, such as inadequate irrigation and moneylender dominance, which he attributed to both British policies and local inertia rather than ideology alone.[71]

Champaran and Kheda Agitations

Mahatma Gandhi seated and raising his arm in a room with other people
Gandhi in a meeting with supporters during his early activism in India
In April 1917, Mahatma Gandhi traveled to Champaran district in Bihar following invitations from local farmers distressed by the tinkathia system imposed by European indigo planters, under which tenants were compelled to cultivate indigo on 3/20ths of their holdings regardless of soil suitability or market conditions.[73] Gandhi arrived on April 10 with associates including Brajkishore Prasad, Rajendra Prasad, and Anugrah Narayan Sinha to document peasant grievances through direct inquiries.[73] On April 15, he reached Motihari, the district headquarters, and continued investigations despite opposition from planters who viewed his activities as interference.[74]
Large crowd of people gathered in an open area
Mass gathering of supporters during Gandhi's satyagraha campaigns
Gandhi initiated satyagraha on April 17 by openly violating a district magistrate's order to cease inquiries and depart the area, leading to his arrest on April 18; however, widespread local support prompted authorities to release him unconditionally.[75] The Bihar government then formed an inquiry committee chaired by Frank Sly, incorporating Gandhi's recommendations, which resulted in the abolition of the *tinkathia* system, partial refunds of illegal exactions estimated at up to 25% of rents, and improved tenancy protections via the Champaran Agrarian Act passed in November 1917 and enacted in 1918.[76] This campaign marked Gandhi's first major application of nonviolent resistance in India, mobilizing over 2,000 peasants and establishing a precedent for peasant-led reform against colonial agrarian policies.[77] Shifting to Gujarat, the Kheda satyagraha arose in early 1918 amid crop failures from heavy rains, floods, and plague in Kheda district, where Patidar farmers assessed land revenue losses exceeding the government's 25% threshold for remission under the famine code yet faced full collection demands.[78] Gandhi, returning from Champaran successes, advised the Gujarat Sabha on January 10 to withhold payments voluntarily for those unable to pay, framing it as satyagraha to pressure authorities without coercion.[79] Vallabhbhai Patel emerged as a key organizer, recruiting volunteers to enforce no-tax pledges among roughly 20,000 affected ryots while emphasizing non-violence and legal compliance in other duties.[80] By March 1918, with auctions of defaulters' property underway, Gandhi intensified the campaign, courting arrest alongside supporters; British officials, wary of escalation amid World War I pressures, conceded partial suspension of revenue collection for holdings assessed below Rs. 300, though wealthier Patidars paid up to avoid confiscations.[81] The movement concluded without full exemption but secured relief for the poorest, halted coercive measures, and enhanced Gandhi's stature by demonstrating satyagraha's efficacy in uniting castes and classes against revenue rigidity during distress.[82]

Escalation of Independence Movements (1920-1934)

Non-Cooperation Movement and Khilafat Alliance

Crowd in procession during Khilafat and Non-Cooperation Movement
Mass procession of participants in the Khilafat and Non-Cooperation Movement
Gandhi launched the Non-Cooperation Movement on 1 August 1920, urging Indians to withdraw support from British-administered institutions, including government schools, courts, legislatures, and foreign goods, as a means to attain swaraj (self-rule) within a year.[83] The campaign was formally endorsed by the Indian National Congress at its special session in Calcutta from 4 to 9 September 1920, and ratified at the Nagpur session in December 1920, where participants surrendered titles and honors awarded by the British.[84] Key programs included boycotting British cloth through public bonfires and promoting indigenous khadi (hand-spun cloth) via charkha spinning, establishing national schools and arbitration courts, and refusing to pay taxes as a last resort.[85] By mid-1921, the movement had mobilized millions, with enrollment in national schools rising to over 100,000 students and an estimated 30,000 arrests by early 1922, marking the first mass-scale participation in the independence struggle.[86]
Group photo of Khilafat Movement supporters with Turkish flag
Khilafat Movement supporters gathered with Ottoman flag
To broaden its base, Gandhi allied the Congress with the Khilafat Movement, a pan-Islamic agitation led by Muslim leaders such as Muhammad Ali and Shaukat Ali, protesting the dismemberment of the Ottoman Caliphate under the 1920 Treaty of Sèvres.[87] Gandhi viewed the alliance, formalized in 1920 when Khilafat committees endorsed non-cooperation, as a strategic opportunity to forge Hindu-Muslim unity against British rule, framing the Khilafat issue as a moral wrong akin to Indian grievances like the Jallianwala Bagh massacre of 13 April 1919, which killed at least 379 civilians.[88] He argued that supporting Muslim demands for preserving the Caliph's temporal powers would demonstrate Hindu goodwill and swell the nationalist ranks, leading to joint rallies, such as the 1921 tour by Gandhi and Ali brothers that drew crowds of up to 100,000.[85] This pact temporarily elevated interfaith cooperation, with Hindus participating in Khilafat funds and Muslims joining Congress bonfires of foreign cloth. However, the movement encountered challenges, including sporadic violence that undermined Gandhi's emphasis on ahimsa (non-violence). On 5 February 1922, in Chauri Chaura, Uttar Pradesh, protesters set fire to a police station, killing 22 officers, prompting Gandhi to suspend the campaign on 12 February despite opposition from leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and C. Rajagopalachari, who saw it as a tactical error amid growing momentum.[89] Gandhi was arrested in March 1922 and sentenced to six years for sedition, though released in 1924 on medical grounds. The Khilafat-Non-Cooperation phase achieved partial economic disruption, with British cloth imports dropping 50% by 1921-1922, but failed to secure immediate swaraj or Khilafat restoration, as Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's secular reforms abolished the Caliphate on 3 March 1924.[85] This disillusioned Muslim participants, eroding the fragile unity and contributing to rising communal tensions, as the religious focus of Khilafat diverged from secular nationalism, foreshadowing later demands for separate electorates and partition.[88]

Salt Satyagraha and Civil Disobedience

Gandhi and satyagrahis marching along coastal mudflats
Mohandas Gandhi leading followers during the Salt March to Dandi
On February 27, 1930, the Indian National Congress authorized Gandhi to launch civil disobedience if his demands, outlined in a letter to Viceroy Lord Irwin on March 2, were not met by March 11; these included abolishing the salt tax, which burdened the poor by monopolizing salt production and sales.[3] With no satisfactory response, Gandhi initiated the Salt Satyagraha by leading the Dandi March from Sabarmati Ashram on March 12, 1930, covering 240 miles to Dandi on the Gujarat coast over 24 days, starting with 78 satyagrahis whose numbers swelled as villagers joined along the route. The marchers adhered strictly to nonviolence, holding prayers and speeches daily to emphasize moral resistance against the British salt monopoly, which generated revenue while restricting Indians from evaporating seawater for salt.[90]
Gandhi walking with Sarojini Naidu and other satyagrahis
Gandhi and Sarojini Naidu during the Salt Satyagraha march
Upon reaching Dandi on April 6, 1930, Gandhi ritually violated the salt law at 8:30 a.m. by picking up natural salt deposits from the shore, symbolically breaking the British monopoly and igniting widespread civil disobedience across India.[91] This act prompted millions, including women led by figures like Sarojini Naidu, to produce salt illegally in coastal regions, boycott British goods, refuse taxes, and picket liquor shops and foreign cloth stores, expanding satyagraha into a mass movement that unified diverse groups against colonial economic exploitation.[3] Parallel marches, such as C. Rajagopalachari's Vedaranyam Salt March starting April 13, replicated the defiance in Tamil Nadu, resulting in his arrest on April 28 along with participants.[92] The British responded with repression, arresting Gandhi on May 4, 1930, near Karadi and imprisoning over 60,000 supporters by year's end, including leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and Vallabhbhai Patel, while deploying police to raid salt pans and use lathi charges against peaceful protesters.[93] A notorious incident occurred on May 21, 1930, at Dharasana Salt Works, where volunteers, led by Abbas Tyabji and later Naidu after his death in custody, marched unarmed into batons, with 320 injured in non-retaliatory fashion, drawing global condemnation of British brutality.[94] Despite Gandhi's insistence on ahimsa, sporadic violence erupted from frustrated crowds, though he publicly condemned it and suspended aspects of the campaign to maintain discipline.[3] Negotiations culminated in the Gandhi-Irwin Pact signed on March 5, 1931, after Gandhi's conditional release on January 25, whereby civil disobedience was suspended in exchange for releasing most political prisoners, permitting peaceful picketing, and allowing salt production for personal use in coastal areas, though the salt tax persisted.[95] The pact enabled Gandhi's participation in the Second Round Table Conference but failed to concede swaraj or full tax abolition, leading to resumed disobedience in 1932 after conference deadlock, highlighting the movement's role in eroding British legitimacy through moral and economic pressure rather than immediate political victory.[92]

Round Table Conferences and Internal Congress Dynamics

The First Round Table Conference convened in London from November 12, 1930, to January 19, 1931, amid the ongoing Civil Disobedience Movement, which prompted the Indian National Congress to boycott the proceedings.[96] With Congress absent, delegates from princely states, Muslim League representatives, and other minority groups attended but failed to reach consensus on key issues such as federal structure and communal representation, highlighting deep divisions that the British exploited to delay reforms.[97] Gandhi, imprisoned during this period, viewed the conference's lack of Indian nationalist participation as underscoring the need for direct negotiation rather than fragmented discussions.[98]
Mahatma Gandhi walking with others in London, 1931, during the Second Round Table Conference period
Gandhi arriving or departing in London for the Second Round Table Conference, 1931
Negotiations between Gandhi and Viceroy Lord Irwin culminated in the Gandhi–Irwin Pact signed on March 5, 1931, suspending civil disobedience in exchange for the release of most political prisoners, permission for peaceful salt production, and Congress participation in the Second Round Table Conference.[99] The pact did not concede dominion status or full responsible government, leading to internal Congress deliberations at the Karachi session in March 1931, where the agreement was ratified alongside resolutions emphasizing fundamental rights and economic reforms influenced by Jawaharlal Nehru's socialist leanings.[100] While the pact temporarily unified Congress under Gandhi's leadership, it revealed strategic tensions, with Nehru and younger leaders advocating more radical independence goals over compromise, though they deferred to Gandhi's authority.[101]
Delegates including Mahatma Gandhi at the Second Round Table Conference in London, 1931
Mahatma Gandhi seated among delegates during the Second Round Table Conference, 1931
At the Second Round Table Conference, held from September 7 to December 1, 1931, Gandhi attended as the sole Congress representative, demanding an interim central government controlled by Congress and rejection of separate electorates for minorities, asserting that Congress embodied all Indian interests. Disputes arose as Muslim delegates, princely states, and others contested Gandhi's claim to unified representation, insisting on safeguards like communal electorates and federal protections, resulting in deadlock and no substantive agreements.[102] Gandhi's return to India on December 28, 1931, prompted Congress's Working Committee to resume civil disobedience on January 3, 1932, leading to his rearrest the next day, which strained internal dynamics as critics questioned the efficacy of his solitary negotiations.[103] The Third Round Table Conference in November–December 1932 proceeded without Congress participation, yielding the Communal Award on August 16, 1932, which granted separate electorates to depressed classes—a provision Gandhi opposed through a fast unto death starting September 20, 1932, pressuring Ambedkar into the Poona Pact for reserved seats instead.[104] Within Congress, the conferences' failures reinforced Gandhi's dominance but amplified debates over non-violence versus militancy, with Nehru's faction pushing for broader socio-economic agendas amid growing leftist influences, though unity prevailed against British divide-and-rule tactics.[97] The overall impasse contributed to the Government of India Act 1935, establishing provincial autonomy but deferring federalism due to unresolved princely and communal issues.[96]

Later Struggles and World War II (1934-1945)

Stance on World War II

Mahatma Gandhi opposed the British government's unilateral declaration of India entering World War II on September 3, 1939, without consulting Indian representatives, viewing it as a continuation of colonial subjugation.[105] He argued that meaningful support for the Allied cause required the prior concession of Indian independence, stating in a 1940 message that Britain's fight against fascism lacked moral authority while denying self-rule to subject nations.[106] The Indian National Congress, under Gandhi's influence, conditioned cooperation on immediate dominion status, leading to ministerial resignations across provinces by late 1939 and a policy of non-involvement in the war effort.[107]
Mahatma Gandhi's letter to Adolf Hitler dated 23 July 1939
Gandhi's 1939 open letter to Hitler urging him to prevent war
Gandhi's pacifist principles led him to advocate non-violent resistance universally, even against Axis aggression. On July 23, 1939, he wrote an open letter to Adolf Hitler, addressed as "Dear Friend," imploring him to prevent war by averting invasion of Poland, emphasizing that such conflict would plunge humanity into barbarism.[108] A second letter followed on December 24, 1940, urging Hitler to seek peace amid ongoing hostilities.[109] To the British, Gandhi suggested in July 1940 that they combat Nazism through unarmed non-violence, allowing voluntary subjugation if necessary to uphold moral superiority over tyranny.[110] In correspondence with U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt on July 1, 1942, he reiterated his hatred of all war, proposing that Indian non-cooperation with Britain's war machine would ultimately aid the Allies by denying complicity in imperial violence.[111] Regarding Nazi persecution of Jews, Gandhi recommended non-violent satyagraha, including collective self-sacrifice if resistance proved futile, as in offering themselves to slaughterhouses en masse to shame oppressors.[112] Following Kristallnacht in November 1938, he advised Jews to "die with joy" rather than seek vengeance or military aid, believing such moral defiance could awaken global conscience against Hitlerism.[113] In 1946, acknowledging the Holocaust's scale—estimating five million Jewish deaths as "the greatest crime of our time"—he maintained that non-violence offered the only ethical path, critiquing Jewish passivity but insisting armed response would degrade victims to aggressors' level.[112] This position stemmed from his absolute commitment to ahimsa, prioritizing ethical consistency over pragmatic survival against industrialized genocide.[114]
Mahatma Gandhi's letter to Franklin D. Roosevelt dated 1 July 1942
Gandhi's 1942 letter to President Roosevelt on non-cooperation and India's role in the war
Gandhi's wartime stance crystallized in opposition to compulsory Indian conscription and resource extraction for the war, framing British demands as exploitative amid famine and economic strain.[115] He viewed Axis ideologies as antithetical to truth and non-violence but held Britain's imperial system equally culpable for global conflict, advocating India's moral disengagement to hasten decolonization and exemplify satyagraha on the world stage.[106] Despite initial ambivalence—having supported Britain in World War I—Gandhi by 1940-1942 prioritized independence, influencing the Congress's rejection of the 1942 Cripps Mission's postwar promises in favor of immediate withdrawal.[107]

Quit India Movement

The Quit India Movement arose amid escalating tensions during World War II, following the failure of the Cripps Mission in March-April 1942, which proposed post-war dominion status for India but rejected immediate independence, prompting Congress rejection.[116] Gandhi, viewing British wartime promises as insincere, advocated for non-violent non-cooperation to force withdrawal, arguing that India's support for the war effort required full sovereignty.[117] On August 8, 1942, at the All-India Congress Committee session in Bombay (now Mumbai), Gandhi delivered the "Quit India" resolution, demanding British exit and empowering Indians to manage self-governance amid global conflict.[118]
Mahatma Gandhi seated with Congress leaders at a meeting
Gandhi with other leaders at the All-India Congress Committee session in Bombay, August 1942
In his speech, Gandhi issued the famous "Do or Die" mantra: "We shall either free India or die in the attempt; we shall not live to see the perpetuation of our slavery," framing the campaign as a final, total effort against colonial rule without endorsing violence.[117] The resolution passed unanimously, calling for mass civil disobedience including hartals (strikes), non-payment of taxes, and parallel governments, while explicitly rejecting armed revolt.[119] However, Gandhi emphasized individual satyagraha over mass action initially to avoid chaos, though the movement's urgency reflected widespread frustration with Britain's wartime exploitation, including resource extraction and suppression of dissent.[120]
Large crowd gathered on an open field in white attire
Mass gathering of participants during the Quit India Movement, 1942
British authorities preemptively arrested Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Vallabhbhai Patel, and other Congress leaders on August 9, 1942, detaining over 100,000 participants by year's end in a bid to decapitate the leadership.[121] Without central control, the movement devolved into sporadic violence in regions like Bihar, Maharashtra, and Uttar Pradesh, including attacks on police stations, railway sabotage, and assaults on government symbols, contradicting Gandhi's non-violent ethos and leading him, from jail, to denounce excesses as counterproductive.[119] Underground networks, led by figures like Jayaprakash Narayan and Aruna Asaf Ali, sustained parallel administration and hoisted the Congress flag in defiance, while students, peasants, and workers participated in strikes and protests.[120] The British response involved military crackdowns, public floggings, and over 60,000 arrests, with hundreds killed in clashes, effectively suppressing organized resistance by late 1943 through ordinance powers and troop deployments.[121] Gandhi's 21-day fast in February 1943 from Aga Khan Palace jail protested treatment of satyagrahis but failed to secure release until health deterioration prompted his freedom on May 6, 1944.[119] Though the movement did not achieve immediate independence and exposed non-violence's limits amid desperation, it galvanized mass anti-colonial sentiment, eroded British legitimacy—evident in wartime administrative strains—and indirectly accelerated post-war negotiations by highlighting ungovernability.[122]

Partition, Independence, and Final Months (1946-1947)

Negotiations and Communal Violence

In early 1946, the British Cabinet Mission proposed a plan for a united India with a federal structure, including provincial groupings to accommodate Muslim interests while rejecting outright partition; Gandhi supported this framework as it preserved national unity, though he emphasized voluntary cooperation over compulsion.[123] The Indian National Congress accepted the plan on June 25, 1946, forming an interim government under Jawaharlal Nehru, but the Muslim League, led by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, initially rejected it before reversing course on June 29 amid internal divisions and demands for parity in the constituent assembly, leading to its ultimate collapse by July due to irreconcilable disputes over grouping and veto powers.[124] Gandhi urged reconciliation through personal talks with Jinnah in May 1946, but these emergency discussions in New Delhi failed to bridge the demand for Pakistan against Gandhi's insistence on a singular sovereign India.[125]
Refugee camp with tents and displaced people during India's Partition
Displaced persons in a refugee camp amid communal violence and mass migration during India's Partition
Tensions erupted on August 16, 1946, when Jinnah called for Direct Action Day to press for Pakistan, resulting in the Great Calcutta Killings, where communal clashes between Hindus and Muslims claimed approximately 4,000 to 10,000 lives over four days, with Muslim-initiated attacks targeting Hindu neighborhoods amid strikes and processions that devolved into arson, stabbings, and massacres, disproportionately affecting Hindus according to eyewitness accounts and police reports.[126] [127] This violence triggered retaliatory riots in Noakhali district, East Bengal, starting October 10, 1946, where Muslim mobs conducted organized assaults on Hindu villages, killing around 5,000 Hindus, forcing conversions, abductions, and rapes, and displacing tens of thousands through looting and arson over weeks.[128] [127] Gandhi responded by launching a peace pilgrimage on November 6, 1946, touring riot-affected areas on foot for months, urging Hindus to stay and practice non-violence while appealing to Muslim villagers for protection of minorities; despite converting some perpetrators and restoring limited communal amity in isolated hamlets, the effort faced resistance from entrenched League supporters, and Gandhi departed in March 1947 amid ongoing threats and incomplete reconciliation.[128] [129] The Noakhali carnage provoked Hindu reprisals in Bihar in late October 1946, where riots from October 25 onward killed thousands of Muslims—estimates range from 5,000 to 7,000—in attacks involving arson and drownings, prompting Gandhi to threaten a fast unto death on November 5 unless violence ceased within 24 hours and to tour affected Bihar areas multiple times in early 1947, condemning the killings as antithetical to ahimsa while pressing local leaders for restitution and protection of Muslim refugees.[130] [131] These chain-reaction riots, spreading to Punjab and United Provinces by early 1947 with tens of thousands dead overall, underscored the deepening Hindu-Muslim divide, fueled by League agitation and Congress organizational frailties, rendering unified negotiations untenable.[132] With violence escalating, Viceroy Lord Mountbatten, appointed in March 1947, accelerated power transfer and announced the Mountbatten Plan on June 3, 1947, endorsing partition into India and Pakistan based on contiguous Muslim-majority districts, with princely states choosing accession; Gandhi, distressed by the prospect, privately opposed it as a vivisection of the motherland that would perpetuate conflict but publicly acquiesced on June 2 after consultations, prioritizing British exit to avert civil war while warning of inevitable bloodshed.[133] [134] In the ensuing months, Gandhi shuttled between Delhi and riot zones, negotiating local ceasefires—such as urging Suhrawardy to aid Hindu refugees in Calcutta—but the plan's implementation triggered massive migrations and further massacres, with over 200,000 deaths by August 15, 1947, as armed groups on both sides enforced demographic shifts through killings and expulsions.[135] Gandhi's non-violent interventions, including prayer meetings and appeals for mutual protection, mitigated some local flare-ups but could not stem the tide of partition-induced anarchy, rooted in unresolved communal demands and British haste.[132]

Partition Acceptance and Post-Independence Efforts

Mahatma Gandhi with Muhammad Ali Jinnah
Gandhi and Jinnah, leaders central to partition discussions
Although Gandhi had consistently opposed the partition of India, viewing it as a surrender to communal violence that contradicted his principles of unity, he reluctantly acquiesced in June 1947 when Congress leaders determined it was the only means to avert civil war.[136] [137] On June 4, 1947, after consultations with Viceroy Mountbatten and key Congress figures in Delhi, Gandhi conceded that no alternative existed to address the Muslim League's intransigence.[138] The Indian National Congress ratified the Mountbatten Plan on June 15, 1947, paving the way for independence and partition on August 15, 1947.[138] [136] In the immediate aftermath of independence, Gandhi prioritized quelling the partition-induced communal riots displacing millions and causing over a million deaths.[137] He remained in Calcutta, where his presence had initially subdued violence, but renewed riots prompted a fast unto death starting at 8:15 p.m. on September 1, 1947, explicitly for Hindu-Muslim unity and civic peace.[136] [139] Lasting until 9:15 p.m. on September 4, 1947—approximately 73 hours—the fast ended after pledges from diverse community leaders, including former Premier H.S. Suhrawardy, to prevent further attacks, leading to an abrupt halt in rioting with no incidents reported in the final 24 hours.[139]
Refugees on overcrowded train during partition migration
Mass displacement on trains during India's partition
Gandhi proceeded to Delhi in early September 1947 to mediate the escalating refugee crisis and anti-Muslim pogroms.[136] As violence persisted into 1948, he undertook a final fast on January 13, 1948, demanding restoration of sanity and protection for minorities.[140] [137] Concluding on January 18, 1948, after Hindu, Muslim, and Sikh representatives signed commitments to seven specific conditions—including mosque restitutions and safe passage for Muslims—it elicited a mass peace pledge from around 200,000 Delhi residents and visibly diminished communal hostilities.[140] Concurrently, Gandhi urged the Indian government to release Pakistan's share of pre-partition assets, approximately 55 crore rupees, to foster stability despite domestic opposition from those prioritizing Hindu refugees.[137] These interventions, rooted in satyagraha, sought to salvage interfaith coexistence amid mass migrations and retaliatory killings.[136]

Assassination and Immediate Aftermath (1948)

Motivations for Assassination

Portrait of Nathuram Vinayak Godse
Nathuram Godse, the Hindu nationalist who assassinated Mahatma Gandhi on January 30, 1948
Nathuram Godse, a Hindu nationalist and editor of the Mahasabha-aligned newspaper Hindu Rashtra, assassinated Mahatma Gandhi on January 30, 1948, primarily due to his perception that Gandhi's policies systematically favored Muslims at the expense of Hindus, culminating in the partition of India and ongoing communal inequities.[141] In his detailed court statement delivered on November 8, 1948, Godse argued that Gandhi's advocacy for Hindu-Muslim unity, including support for the Khilafat Movement in 1919–1924, emboldened Muslim separatism and weakened Hindu resolve against British rule and internal threats.[142] He contended that Gandhi's insistence on non-violence prevented effective resistance to communal riots, such as those in Noakhali in 1946 where Hindus faced mass killings and forced conversions, estimating that Gandhi's approach contributed to the displacement and deaths of over 10 million Hindus and Sikhs during partition violence from August 1947 onward.[142][143] The immediate catalyst, as articulated by Godse, was Gandhi's fast unto death beginning January 12, 1948, ostensibly to halt anti-Muslim violence in Delhi but interpreted by critics as pressuring the Indian government—dominated by Hindu-majority Congress leaders—to release a withheld payment of 550 million rupees (55 crore) to Pakistan.[144] This sum, part of pre-partition asset divisions, had been retained by India amid Pakistan's invasion of Kashmir in October 1947, which Godse viewed as unprovoked aggression displacing thousands of Hindus; Gandhi's intervention, leading to the payment's release on January 15, 1948, was seen as rewarding Pakistan's actions while Hindus in Pakistan endured pogroms without reciprocal concessions.[142] Godse rejected Gandhi's absolutist non-violence as impractical realpolitik, asserting it fostered a culture of Hindu submissiveness that enabled partition despite opposition from groups like the Hindu Mahasabha, resulting in the vivisection of India and the creation of a Muslim-majority state amid widespread Hindu suffering.[141] Godse, who had collaborated with figures like V.D. Savarkar but operated independently in the assassination plot, framed his act not as personal hatred but as a desperate measure to halt what he described as Gandhi's "pseudo-religion" of unyielding appeasement, which he believed perpetuated Hindu vulnerability post-independence.[145] While Godse accepted full responsibility during his trial, emphasizing premeditation over five hours of testimony, his motivations reflected broader Hindu nationalist grievances over Gandhi's perceived role in conceding to the Muslim League's demands, including the acceptance of partition on August 15, 1947, despite earlier Congress pledges for a united India.[143][146] These views, drawn from Godse's own writings and statements, underscore a causal belief among some nationalists that Gandhi's moral absolutism ignored empirical realities of demographic imbalances and historical Muslim assertiveness, prioritizing symbolic unity over pragmatic defense of Hindu interests.[142]

Funeral and Hindu Nationalist Perspectives

Mahatma Gandhi's funeral pyre in flames with large crowds and military personnel
The cremation of Mahatma Gandhi at Raj Ghat, showing the pyre being lit amid massive crowds of mourners
Gandhi's body was cremated on January 31, 1948, following traditional Hindu rites combined with state ceremonial elements, after his assassination the previous evening at Birla House in New Delhi.[147] The procession, which began at 9:30 a.m. and covered approximately four miles to the cremation site on the banks of the Yamuna River at Raj Ghat, drew an estimated 1 to 2 million mourners lining the streets, with the cortege taking over five hours to reach its destination due to the crowds.[148][149] Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, other Congress leaders, and international dignitaries participated, while the rites included sandalwood pyre ignition by Gandhi's son Devdas, reflecting both personal and national mourning.[147][149] Hindu nationalist perspectives on Gandhi's death and funeral emphasized grievances over his policies, viewing them as having systematically disadvantaged Hindus in favor of Muslims, culminating in partition's violence and displacement of millions. Nathuram Godse, the assassin and a member of the Hindu Mahasabha until resigning shortly before the act, articulated in his May 1948 court statement—later suppressed by the government but circulated in excerpts—that he initially revered Gandhi but concluded his non-violence doctrine crippled Hindu self-defense against Muslim aggression, citing examples like Gandhi's support for the Khilafat Movement, which Godse claimed empowered pan-Islamism at Hindu expense, and his 1948 fasts pressuring India to release 550 million rupees to Pakistan amid its invasion of Kashmir and to curb Hindu retaliation during communal riots.[142][145] Godse argued Gandhi's insistence on Hindu-Muslim unity ignored empirical patterns of Muslim separatism and violence, leading to the deaths of over 500,000 Hindus and the abandonment of sacred sites, and that his assassination was a necessary act to halt further national emasculation, though he expressed regret for any Hindu disunity it caused.[142] The Hindu Mahasabha officially condemned the assassination as an aberration, with leaders distancing themselves to avoid culpability, yet internal sentiments aligned with Godse's critique of Gandhi's "one-sided" appeasement, including his failure to reciprocate Hindu suffering during partition migrations where Hindus faced massacres in Pakistan while Gandhi fasted primarily against Hindu reprisals in India.[141][145] Figures like V.D. Savarkar, a Mahasabha ideologue acquitted in the conspiracy trial, had long opposed Gandhi's pacifism as enabling Hindu subjugation, though public participation in the funeral by some nationalists occurred amid widespread grief.[141] The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), from which Godse had earlier disaffiliated, publicly denounced the killing and saw members attend mourning events, but faced a temporary ban by the government, which attributed communal tensions partly to such organizations' rhetoric against Gandhi's conciliatory stance.[141] These views framed the funeral not as unqualified veneration but as a moment exposing fractures in Hindu unity, with Gandhi's legacy seen by critics as prioritizing abstract ahimsa over pragmatic defense of Hindu interests against verifiable historical aggressions.[145][142]

Philosophical and Practical Beliefs

Satyagraha, Truth, and Non-Violence

Satyagraha, Gandhi's doctrine of non-violent resistance, emerged during his campaigns in South Africa against discriminatory laws, particularly the Asiatic Registration Act of 1906, which required Indian residents to register fingerprints. Initially termed "passive resistance," Gandhi renamed it satyagraha—from Sanskrit satya (truth) and agraha (firmness or insistence)—around 1907 to emphasize moral insistence on truth rather than mere negation of action.[150][151] He described it as "soul-force" or "love-force," a method where the practitioner voluntarily suffers to convert the opponent through unwavering adherence to justice, without hatred or retaliation.[152] Central to satyagraha is the concept of satya (truth), which Gandhi equated with ultimate reality and God, deriving the term from sat meaning "being" or existence itself. In his view, nothing exists except truth, and the pursuit of truth demands relentless self-purification and experimentation, as detailed in his autobiography The Story of My Experiments with Truth (serialized from 1925).[153] Gandhi held that truth is absolute and knowable only through personal moral striving, rejecting relativism; compromise on truth equates to untruth, rendering satyagraha ineffective if the practitioner harbors doubt or insincerity.[154] Complementing truth is ahimsa (non-violence), which Gandhi expanded beyond physical restraint to encompass absence of harm in thought, word, or deed, including hatred or ill will. Influenced by Jainism's emphasis on non-injury, Hindu texts like the Bhagavad Gita, and Christian figures such as Leo Tolstoy, ahimsa requires loving the enemy and viewing all life as interconnected.[155][156] Gandhi, revered as the living embodiment of ahimsa, adopted it as the fundamental principle of his life, famously stating that "non-violence is the greatest power," and exemplified it personally through satyagraha campaigns of non-violent resistance against British rule. Despite these interfaith influences, Gandhi opposed proselytization and aggressive religious conversions, believing Hinduism sufficient for Indians' spiritual needs, promoting interfaith harmony without intent to convert India to Christianity, and criticizing missionary tactics that masked conversion efforts as humanitarian aid.[157] Gandhi insisted ahimsa is not weakness but supreme strength, demanding greater courage than violence, as the satyagrahi courts suffering to awaken the opponent's conscience without coercion.[158] These principles interlock inseparably: satyagraha is the active pursuit of truth via ahimsa, where violence—even defensive—undermines truth by prioritizing self over moral ends. In Hind Swaraj (1909), Gandhi critiqued modern civilization's violent methods, advocating satyagraha as moral self-rule (swaraj) through non-cooperation with evil, not passive inaction but disciplined resistance.[159] He maintained that true non-violence presupposes truthfulness, as "truth and nonviolence are as old as the hills," yet require constant vigilance against cowardice masquerading as ahimsa.[155] Gandhi's experiments, including fasting and civil disobedience, tested these ideas, asserting that satyagraha converts through suffering's moral appeal, not force.[160]

Economic Ideas: Swadeshi, Trusteeship, and Critiques of Industrialization

Gandhi's economic philosophy prioritized village-based self-sufficiency and moral restraint over expansive industrial growth, viewing unchecked materialism as a source of societal decay. He rejected both laissez-faire capitalism and Marxist socialism, proposing instead systems that distributed production and wealth to empower the masses directly. Central tenets included swadeshi for local economic revival, trusteeship to mitigate inequality without coercion, and a fundamental opposition to mechanized industry that he saw as dehumanizing labor and fostering dependency.[161][162]
Mahatma Gandhi spinning on a charkha at Sabarmati Ashram, 1925
Gandhi using the spinning wheel (charkha) to produce khadi at Sabarmati Ashram in 1925
Swadeshi, interpreted by Gandhi as an all-encompassing duty to serve one's immediate community through indigenous production, aimed to dismantle economic reliance on foreign imports and revive rural crafts. He elevated the charkha and production of khadi as symbols and tools of this principle, arguing that hand-spinning provided widespread employment and countered the unemployment caused by British textile mills. Gandhi intensified promotion of khadi from 1918 onward, integrating it into satyagraha campaigns and the 1920-1922 Non-Cooperation Movement, where millions adopted spinning to boycott Manchester cloth and build self-reliant village economies. By the 1920s, he established organizations like the All India Spinners' Association to scale khadi production, targeting poverty alleviation through decentralized, labor-intensive industry.[162][163] Trusteeship posited that the affluent serve as stewards of their wealth, holding it in divine trust for societal welfare rather than personal accumulation. Drawing from his 1888-1891 legal studies in equity, the Bhagavad Gita's emphasis on selfless duty, and Ruskin's Unto This Last, Gandhi first referenced the idea in 1908 and developed it fully after his 1915 return to India, articulating it in Young India during the 1920s. Under this framework, the wealthy could retain a modest "commission" for sustenance but must redirect surplus to the needy, with non-compliance potentially justifying state intervention; this voluntary mechanism sought economic equity by aligning self-interest with service, avoiding the violence of expropriation.[161][164] In Hind Swaraj (1909), Gandhi excoriated industrialization as a "prostitute" civilization that enslaved populations through artificial needs and centralized control. He contended that machinery, by enabling mass production for profit, displaced artisans, multiplied luxuries, and eroded moral fiber, leading to idleness among the many while enriching the few. Railways exemplified this harm, tightening imperial grip, disseminating plagues and famines by disrupting local self-sufficiency, and promoting homogenized consumption over organic community ties. Gandhi advocated instead for tools scaled to human capacity, ensuring production by the masses for subsistence needs, as evidenced by pre-colonial India's decentralized economies which sustained higher employment before mechanized imports decimated handicrafts.[165][162]

Social Reforms: Untouchability, Varna, and Caste Debates

Mahatma Gandhi in a train compartment receiving a donation
Gandhi accepting contributions from supporters during his reform campaigns
Gandhi opposed untouchability as a distortion of Hinduism, terming those affected "Harijans" or children of God, and integrated anti-untouchability efforts into his broader satyagraha campaigns from the 1920s onward.[166] In 1932, he founded the Harijan Sevak Sangh to organize efforts against the practice, emphasizing temple entry, access to public wells, and social integration within Hindu society.[167] He commenced publication of the weekly Harijan newspaper on February 11, 1933, from Yeravda Jail, using it to advocate reforms and critique caste prejudices.[168]
Mahatma Gandhi seated on a cot surrounded by people
Gandhi during his 1932 fast unto death in Yeravda Jail protesting the Communal Award
From November 1933 to August 1934, Gandhi undertook an extensive tour covering approximately 12,500 miles across India, promoting Harijan upliftment through public meetings, padayatras, and direct interventions like cleaning village latrines to model dignity for manual labor.[169] [170] Gandhi visited Odisha eight times between 1921 and 1946; in May 1934, during one of these visits, he launched a foot march in Odisha specifically to abolish untouchability, urging caste Hindus to inter-dine and associate with Harijans.[171] Earlier, on September 20, 1932, Gandhi began a fast unto death in Yeravda Jail protesting the British Communal Award's provision for separate electorates for depressed classes, viewing it as perpetuating division within Hinduism.[172] Gandhi distinguished varna—idealized as a functional division of labor based on aptitude and ancestral occupation—from the rigid, birth-based jati system that enforced untouchability, arguing the former promoted harmony without hierarchy of worth.[173] He condemned the caste system's evolution into hereditary exclusivity as antithetical to spiritual and national progress, yet maintained varnashrama dharma as a natural, scientific principle for societal order, initially opposing inter-varna marriages to preserve occupational specialization.[174] [175] Over time, he advocated voluntary adherence to varna without compulsion, critiquing both untouchability's degradations and demands for its total abolition as overlooking Hinduism's redeemable core.[176] Central to caste debates was Gandhi's conflict with B.R. Ambedkar, who rejected reformist integration in favor of political separatism and legal eradication of caste.[177] The Poona Pact, signed on September 24, 1932, resolved Gandhi's fast by replacing separate electorates with reserved seats for depressed classes in joint Hindu electorates, increasing representation from 71 to 148 seats while preserving Hindu unity as Gandhi prioritized.[178] [179] Ambedkar later criticized the pact as coerced, arguing Gandhi's paternalism subordinated Dalit agency to upper-caste goodwill and failed to dismantle caste's structural inequalities, contrasting Gandhi's emphasis on moral persuasion over constitutional severance.[167] Gandhi, in turn, faulted separate electorates for entrenching otherness, insisting true emancipation required internal Hindu purification rather than external fragmentation.[180]

Personal Practices: Brahmacharya, Diet, and Ascetic Experiments

Gandhi interpreted brahmacharya—a Hindu concept of celibate self-control—as essential for harnessing vital energy toward truth and non-violence, taking a formal vow of sexual abstinence in 1906 at age 37, after 21 years of marriage and fathering four sons.[181] He described this commitment in his autobiography as a deliberate experiment to redirect sensual impulses into spiritual discipline, arguing that unchecked desires weakened moral resolve and political efficacy.[182] Gandhi maintained this vow lifelong, viewing it not merely as physical restraint but as purity of thought, essential for a satyagrahi's integrity.[181]
Mahatma Gandhi with female associates in ashram setting
Gandhi surrounded by women from his ashram in his later years
To rigorously test his brahmacharya, Gandhi conducted controversial "experiments" in his final years, sleeping naked alongside young women, including his grandniece Manu Gandhi and other female ashram residents, from around 1946 to 1947, when he was in his late 70s.[183] [184] He rationalized these as proofs of mental detachment, claiming no arousal occurred and that communal nudity fostered platonic purity, but critics, drawing from his own letters and associates' accounts, contend they risked psychological coercion on subordinates and reflected an obsessive, patriarchal control over female associates' agency.[185] [186] These practices, documented in biographies citing primary sources like Gandhi's correspondence, underscore his prioritization of personal ascetic trials over conventional propriety, though they alienated family members such as his son Devdas.[187]
Mahatma Gandhi eating a simple meal with a woman
Gandhi sharing a sparse vegetarian meal on the floor
Gandhi's dietary regimen emphasized vegetarianism as a moral and health imperative, rooted in a boyhood promise to his Jain-influenced mother to abstain from meat, which he upheld despite a brief teenage experiment with mutton prompted by a friend's nationalist arguments around 1880, abandoned after vivid guilt over violating his vow.[188] [189] In London from 1888 to 1891, he adopted a sparse vegetarian diet of porridge, bread, and cocoa to counter malnutrition, joining the Vegetarian Society and experimenting with nuts and fruits for sustenance without animal products.[190] Later phases included fruitarianism from the 1910s, consuming uncooked foods like oranges, lemons, and almonds to minimize digestion's drain on energy, and intermittent raw vegan trials, though he resumed goat's milk in 1929 under medical advice during illness, rejecting cow's milk as exploitative.[191] [192] He advocated unrefined staples like jaggery over sugar, unfired (raw) meals, and portion control, linking such simplicity to ethical living and self-reliance, with experiments spanning over five decades to optimize vitality for public work.[193] Complementing these, Gandhi's ascetic experiments pursued extreme simplicity and sensory restraint, including daily manual tasks like spinning khadi cloth on a charkha from 1917 onward to embody economic self-sufficiency and reject luxury.[194] He embraced minimal possessions—often just a loincloth, shawl, and utensils—walking barefoot for miles during travels to cultivate humility, and practiced frequent fasts for personal purification, initiating regular ones around 1909 with short water-only abstinences to curb overeating and enhance willpower.[195] [196] Over his life, these totaled at least 17 major fasts encompassing roughly 135 days, with personal ones on lunar days like Ekadashi or festivals such as Janmashtami for dietary reset, distinct from political fasts though overlapping in intent to model self-sacrifice.[192] [197] Gandhi framed these as empirical trials in his autobiography, subordinating bodily comfort to moral clarity, though some contemporaries questioned their health impacts given his recurrent illnesses like dysentery.[198]

Major Controversies and Criticisms

Racial Views and Actions in South Africa

Upon arriving in South Africa in 1893 as a lawyer for an Indian firm, Mohandas K. Gandhi encountered racial discrimination against Indians, prompting him to advocate for their distinct rights separate from those of black Africans, whom he referred to as "Kaffirs," a derogatory term implying inferiority. In petitions such as the 1895 appeal to the colonial secretary, Gandhi argued that Indians, as British subjects of a civilized race, should not be equated with "the Natives of Africa," emphasizing their higher cultural status to seek exemptions from laws applied to Africans.[199] He wrote in 1894 that a prevailing belief held Indians as "little better, if at all, than savages or the Natives of Africa," positioning Indians above Africans in the racial hierarchy to protest their mistreatment alongside blacks.[200] Gandhi's efforts reinforced a tiered racial system, lobbying for facilities like separate entrances for Indians apart from both whites and Africans, as in his objection to Indians being "classed with the natives" in public spaces.[201] In 1903, he stated that white people should remain "the predominating race" in South Africa, reflecting his acceptance of European superiority while seeking elevated status for Indians.[183] Through the Natal Indian Congress founded in 1894 and his newspaper Indian Opinion launched in 1903, Gandhi focused exclusively on Indian grievances, such as voting rights and pass laws, without extending solidarity to African struggles, viewing blacks as "raw" and uncivilized with minimal interaction.[202] During the Second Boer War (1899–1902), Gandhi organized the Indian Ambulance Corps of about 1,100 volunteers to aid British forces against Boers and Africans, motivated by loyalty to the Empire to secure political concessions for Indians rather than humanitarian aid to all races.[4] This service earned him the Kaiser-i-Hind medal in 1901, but critics note it aligned Indians with imperial forces suppressing black resistance.[203] Similarly, in the 1906 Bambatha (Zulu) Rebellion against a poll tax, Gandhi formed another stretcher-bearer unit of around 20 Indians to support British troops quelling the uprising, justifying participation as demonstrating Indian worthiness for rights amid what he saw as Zulu indiscipline.[204][205] These actions and statements, drawn from Gandhi's early writings and autobiography, reveal a hierarchical worldview prioritizing Indian advancement within colonial structures over broader anti-racist solidarity, though some later reflections in his Collected Works show evolving interactions with Africans during satyagraha campaigns after 1906. Primary sources like petitions and Indian Opinion articles consistently distinguish Indians from Africans, attributing Indian disabilities to white prejudice rather than systemic racial oppression affecting all non-whites equally.

Caste Positions and Conflicts with Ambedkar

Gandhi viewed the traditional varna system as an ideal of functional division of labor based on aptitude rather than birth, but he condemned its degeneration into a hereditary, rigid caste hierarchy marked by untouchability.[173] He argued that untouchability was a "crime against humanity and God," incompatible with true Hinduism, and launched the Harijan Sevak Sangh in 1932 to eradicate it through temple entry, education, and social integration efforts.[206] Gandhi renamed lower castes "Harijans" (children of God) to foster dignity and launched the weekly Harijan in 1933 to propagate anti-untouchability messages, emphasizing moral persuasion over legal coercion to reform Hindu society from within.[207] Despite these initiatives, he maintained that varna provided social order and opposed its complete abolition, believing inter-varna mixing would disrupt harmony, a stance that drew accusations of preserving inequality.[208]
B.R. Ambedkar at his desk
B.R. Ambedkar, representative of Dalit interests during the 1932 Communal Award dispute
The core conflict arose in 1932 over the British Communal Award, which granted separate electorates to Depressed Classes (Dalits) for provincial legislatures, allowing them to vote for their own candidates in reserved seats before the general electorate.[209] Gandhi, imprisoned in Yerwada Central Jail, viewed this as a vivisection of Hinduism that would perpetuate division and weaken national unity, prompting him to begin a fast unto death on September 20, 1932, which pressured negotiations.[178] B.R. Ambedkar, representing Dalit interests, initially supported separate electorates to ensure genuine political empowerment free from upper-caste dominance, arguing that joint electorates would allow Hindu majorities to select pliable Dalit candidates.[210]
Mahatma Gandhi and B.R. Ambedkar together
Mahatma Gandhi and B.R. Ambedkar, central figures in the caste and electorate debate leading to the Poona Pact
This led to the Poona Pact, signed on September 24, 1932, by Ambedkar and Madan Mohan Malaviya (on behalf of Gandhi and Hindus), increasing reserved seats for Depressed Classes from 71 to 148 in joint electorates while scrapping separate ones, with primary elections among Dalits to nominate candidates.[177] Gandhi ended his fast on September 26, hailing it as a victory for unity, but Ambedkar later described it as a "political defeat" for Dalits, claiming it entrenched dependency on caste Hindus without dismantling systemic barriers.[178] Ambedkar criticized Gandhi's approach as paternalistic, rooted in a varna ideology that sanitized caste rather than annihilating it, as outlined in his 1936 speech "Annihilation of Caste," where he rejected Gandhi's reforms as superficial concessions preserving Hindu orthodoxy.[210] Gandhi countered that Ambedkar's separatism echoed Muslim demands for partition and undermined self-reliance through moral upliftment, insisting true emancipation required Hindus to atone collectively for untouchability without electoral crutches.[209] Post-Pact, Ambedkar escalated critiques, accusing Gandhi of hypocrisy for opposing untouchability while upholding varna as divinely ordained, and in 1956, he led mass conversions to Buddhism to escape caste's grip, viewing Gandhi's Hinduism as irredeemable.[211] Gandhi, in turn, praised Ambedkar's intellect but lamented his alienation from Hinduism, continuing campaigns like village sanitation drives involving Harijans until his death, though empirical outcomes showed limited penetration against entrenched caste practices.[212] Their divergence highlighted a fundamental tension: Gandhi's integrative reform versus Ambedkar's structural dismantling, with the Pact providing short-term representation but arguably delaying caste's radical reconfiguration.[177]

Hindu-Muslim Relations, Khilafat, and Partition Blame

Portrait of Mehmed VI, last Ottoman Caliph
Mehmed VI, the Ottoman Sultan and Caliph central to the Khilafat Movement
Gandhi regarded Hindu-Muslim unity as essential for achieving swaraj, strategically supporting the Khilafat Movement from 1919 to 1922 to integrate Muslim grievances against British policies toward the Ottoman Caliphate into the broader independence struggle.[88] He allied with Khilafat leaders such as the Ali brothers, linking their cause to the Non-Cooperation Movement launched on September 4, 1920, which mobilized mass protests including boycotts and resignations from government positions.[213] This partnership temporarily expanded Congress influence among Muslims, with over 30,000 arrests by 1921, but sowed seeds of discord by prioritizing pan-Islamic loyalty over Indian nationalism.[214] The movement's collapse followed the Turkish abolition of the Caliphate on March 3, 1924, by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, leading to disillusionment and a surge in communal riots, including the Kohat violence in September 1924 where 155 Hindus were killed or displaced.[213] A stark example was the Moplah Rebellion starting August 20, 1921, in Malabar, where Khilafat-inspired Moplah Muslims killed over 2,000 Hindus, forcibly converted 10,000, and destroyed temples amid anti-British and anti-Hindu attacks.[215] Gandhi, in Young India on September 29, 1921, described the Moplahs as "brave God-fearing" fighters for khilafat and swaraj, urging Hindus to embrace non-violent submission rather than retaliation, a stance critics interpret as excusing jihadist violence and eroding Hindu self-defense.[216] In response to escalating tensions, he undertook a 21-day fast from September 18 to October 8, 1924, in Delhi for communal harmony, broken after interfaith pledges, though riots persisted.[197]
Communal riot scene with smoke, police, and crowds in a city street
Violence during communal riots in Calcutta during the lead-up to Partition
Gandhi's repeated appeals for unity, including during 1930s negotiations, failed to bridge deepening divides, culminating in failed talks with Muhammad Ali Jinnah from September 9 to 27, 1944.[217] Based on the Rajagopalachari Formula, Gandhi proposed plebiscites in Muslim-majority areas for self-determination but rejected Jinnah's demand for a sovereign Pakistan encompassing all Indian Muslims under the two-nation theory; Jinnah viewed Gandhi's terms as diluting Muslim sovereignty, leading to impasse.[218] As 1946 Direct Action Day riots in Calcutta claimed 4,000-10,000 lives, mostly Hindu, and spread nationwide, Gandhi opposed but acquiesced to Partition on June 3, 1947, to prevent total civil war, arguing that forced unity would perpetuate violence.[138][219] Criticisms attribute Partition's violence—resulting in 1-2 million deaths and 15 million displaced—to Gandhi's policies, contending his Khilafat concessions emboldened Muslim separatism by validating religious over national identity, while non-violence disarmed Hindus against demographic aggression.[214][220] Hindu nationalists argue this appeasement, echoed in his post-riot advice for Hindus to die non-violently, ignored irreconcilable theological and historical animosities, with British divide-and-rule exploiting Gandhi's idealism rather than his leadership resolving them.[221] Gandhi's final fast unto death, begun January 13, 1948, targeted Delhi's communal strife, broken on January 18 after Muslim leaders pledged peace, but failed to stem Punjab massacres; his assassination on January 30 by Nathuram Godse stemmed from perceptions of pro-Muslim bias.[197] Empirical patterns of post-Khilafat riots suggest Gandhi's unity paradigm underestimated causal drivers like Islamist supremacism, contributing to Partition's inevitability despite his opposition.[222]

Personal Life: Family Treatment and Sexual Celibacy Tests

Gandhi married Kasturba Makhanji Kapadia in 1883 at the age of 13 in an arranged union typical of the era; she was also around 13 or 14 years old. The couple had four sons—Harilal (born October 28, 1888), Manilal (born October 28, 1892), Ramdas (born April 8, 1897), and Devdas (born May 22, 1900)—with the first child dying in infancy. Kasturba accompanied Gandhi to South Africa in 1897 and supported his political activities, enduring arrests alongside him, though their relationship involved tensions over his evolving ascetic demands, including enforced vegetarianism and simplicity that she initially resisted.[223][224] Gandhi's parenting emphasized moral and spiritual discipline over material provision, often prioritizing his public commitments; he departed for South Africa shortly after Harilal's birth, leaving the family behind until Harilal was nine. This absence fostered resentment, particularly with Harilal, whom Gandhi denied funding for law studies in England in 1910 unless he first mastered khadi spinning and adopted stricter vows, viewing Western education as incompatible with self-reliance. Harilal's subsequent rebellion included alcohol dependency, failed businesses, and a 1936 conversion to Islam (reverting to Hinduism in 1938), prompting Gandhi to publicly state in 1935 that Harilal had "no right to use my name for personal gain" and to accuse him of "alcohol and debauchery" in private correspondence. The other sons were more compliant—Manilal managed ashrams, Ramdas participated in satyagrahas, and Devdas became a journalist—but family dynamics remained strained by Gandhi's insistence on communal living and rejection of privileges.[225][226][227] During Kasturba's final illness in 1944, afflicted with pneumonia and heart issues while imprisoned in Aga Khan Palace, Gandhi rejected penicillin treatment despite his son Devdas arranging its import from Calcutta; he favored prayer, enemas, and traditional remedies, believing modern medicine violated faith in divine will, leading to her death on February 22, 1944. Gandhi later accepted quinine for his own malaria episodes in the 1920s and surgery for appendicitis in 1924 under similar constraints, highlighting inconsistencies in his application of principles to family versus self. These decisions reflected his broader rejection of Western biomedicine in favor of holistic self-purification, though critics attribute Kasturba's death partly to this stance.[228][229][230] Gandhi embraced brahmacharya—a vow of celibacy and sensory control—in November 1906 at age 37 during a period of personal crisis in South Africa, framing it as essential for channeling vital energy toward public service after fathering four children. He periodically tested this vow through increasingly intimate "experiments" in non-attachment, initially separating men and women in ashrams but escalating post-Kasturba's death to sharing beds with young female companions, often unclothed, to verify arousal absence and spiritual mastery; no sexual intercourse occurred, as Gandhi documented in letters and associates confirmed. These intensified from 1944 onward, involving his personal physician Sushila Nayar and grandnieces Abha and Manu Gandhi; by December 1946, Manu (then 17–19 years old) joined him platonically in bed during travels, with Gandhi rationalizing it as purifying both parties' souls amid India's communal violence. Manu's diaries from April 1943 reveal her emotional turmoil, including tears and self-doubt, during early phases of these trials.[231][232][185] The experiments drew internal criticism from aides like Pyarelal and Munnalal Shah, who resigned in protest by early 1947, arguing they risked scandal and contradicted non-violence by imposing psychological burdens on participants; Gandhi defended them as voluntary tests of truth-force, ceasing publicly after associates' objections but continuing privately until his death. While Gandhi viewed these as empirical proofs of celibacy's efficacy for non-violent resistance, contemporary accounts and later analyses question their ethics, citing power imbalances and potential exploitation despite the absence of consummation.[233][187][186]

Strategic Failures: Non-Violence Efficacy and Delayed Independence

Gandhi's commitment to satyagraha and non-violence shaped the Indian National Congress's strategy from the 1920s onward, emphasizing mass civil disobedience to undermine British authority through economic disruption and moral suasion rather than armed confrontation.[234] However, the Non-Cooperation Movement (1920–1922) was abruptly halted by Gandhi on February 12, 1922, following the Chauri Chaura incident on February 5, where a mob killed 22 policemen, leading critics to argue that this premature withdrawal dissipated revolutionary fervor and allowed British repression to reassert control without concessions.[235] Similarly, the Civil Disobedience Movement (1930–1934), highlighted by the Salt March of March 12–April 6, 1930, resulted in over 60,000 arrests but ended with the Gandhi–Irwin Pact on March 5, 1931, which critics viewed as a compromise that failed to secure immediate political gains and instead prolonged negotiations.[3] The Quit India Movement, launched on August 8, 1942, with Gandhi's "Do or Die" call, faced swift British suppression, arresting over 100,000 participants and resulting in approximately 1,000 deaths by official counts, yet it did not compel withdrawal until after World War II.[234] Empirical assessments question non-violence's causal role in independence, noting that Britain's empire-wide commitments during the war, including defending against Japanese advances, strained resources, but Gandhi's strategy avoided exploiting these vulnerabilities through coordinated sabotage or alliances with Axis powers as pursued by Subhas Chandra Bose.[235] Bose, expelled from Congress in 1939 for advocating armed resistance, formed the Indian National Army (INA) in 1942 with Japanese support, recruiting over 40,000 Indian prisoners of war; though militarily defeated, the INA's 1945–1946 Red Fort trials sparked widespread protests and the Royal Indian Navy mutiny on February 18, 1946, involving 20,000 sailors across 78 ships, which accelerated British perceptions of untenable control.[236][237] Britain's post-war economic collapse—owing £3 billion in debts, with India accounting for 70% of military expenditures during the conflict—rendered colonial administration unsustainable, prompting the Labour government's decision under Clement Attlee to transfer power by August 15, 1947, irrespective of non-violent campaigns.[238] Historians attribute the timing less to satyagraha's moral pressure than to wartime exhaustion, U.S. anti-colonial influence via the Atlantic Charter of August 14, 1941, and internal British debates, as evidenced by Cabinet Mission records from 1946 prioritizing rapid exit over prolonged dominion status.[237] Gandhi's insistence on non-violence marginalized militant factions, including Bose's Forward Bloc, fostering internal Congress divisions that delayed unified pressure; for instance, the 1922 suspension alienated youth wings, contributing to sporadic violence like the Kakori Train Robbery of August 9, 1925, without strategic escalation.[239] This approach, while avoiding partition-scale bloodshed during campaigns, arguably extended subjugation by forgoing opportunities post-World War I, when Britain's victory left it temporarily weakened but facing a non-confrontational Congress under Gandhi's influence from 1915.[240] Critics, including leftist analysts, contend that non-violence's efficacy was overstated in nationalist narratives, as independence aligned with imperial retrenchment rather than ethical conversion of British policy, with Gandhi himself acknowledging in 1947 interviews that the war's outcome was pivotal.[235] Bose's contrasting militarism, though unsuccessful on the battlefield, demonstrated through INA defections and trials that armed symbolism could provoke loyalty crises in the 2.5-million-strong Indian Army, a factor absent in pure non-violent phases.[241] Thus, Gandhi's strategic framework, by prioritizing ethical purity over pragmatic exploitation of geopolitical shifts, contributed to a 30-year delay from the 1919 Rowlatt Satyagraha to 1947, during which Britain's global dominance waned but Indian leverage remained moral rather than coercive.[242]

Writings and Intellectual Output

Key Texts and Autobiographical Works

Open book showing title page of Gandhi's autobiography
Title page of 'An Autobiography or The Story of My Experiments with Truth' by M.K. Gandhi, translated by Mahadev Desai, Navajivan Publishing House edition
Gandhi's most prominent autobiographical work is The Story of My Experiments with Truth, originally written in Gujarati and serialized in the weekly journal Navjivan from 1925 to 1929, covering his life from childhood up to 1921.[243] The narrative details his personal experiments with truth, non-violence, diet, celibacy, and satyagraha, emphasizing moral and spiritual self-examination over chronological events.[244] An English translation by Mahadev Desai appeared in two volumes in 1940, making it accessible globally and influencing readers on Gandhi's philosophy of self-rule through inner discipline.[243] Among his key texts, Hind Swaraj (Indian Home Rule), composed in Gujarati during a voyage from London to South Africa in November 1909 and published in 1910, critiques modern Western civilization as diseased, advocating swaraj as self-rule achieved through ethical means rather than violence or industrialization. In dialogue form between a reader and editor, Gandhi argues that true independence requires rejecting railways, machinery, and lawyers, favoring village-based self-sufficiency and moral regeneration over parliamentary politics. The book, banned briefly by British authorities in India for sedition, laid foundational ideas for his later campaigns, prioritizing soul-force over brute force. Satyagraha in South Africa, written in Gujarati between 1924 and 1925 and first published in 1928, recounts Gandhi's development of satyagraha during his 21 years in South Africa from 1893 to 1914, including campaigns against discriminatory laws like the Asiatic Registration Act.[49] The text explains satyagraha as "truth-force" or non-violent resistance, detailing specific struggles such as the 1906-1913 protests involving marches, strikes, and voluntary imprisonment, which secured concessions from the South African government.[49] It serves as both historical account and practical guide, coining and elaborating the term satyagraha to distinguish it from passive resistance.[49] Other notable texts include My Non-violence (1960), a posthumous compilation of Gandhi's writings on non-violence edited by Sailesh Kumar Bandopadhyaya,[245] Key to Health (1942), where Gandhi outlines principles of natural hygiene, emphasizing diet, enemas, and mud packs for self-reliant health without reliance on modern medicine.[243] Village Swaraj, a compilation of his writings edited posthumously, articulates his vision of decentralized village republics as the basis for independent India, promoting self-governance, khadi spinning, and sanitation. These works, drawn from journals like Young India and Harijan, reflect Gandhi's integration of personal ethics with socio-political reform, often prioritizing empirical self-testing over abstract theory.[243]

Influence on Thought and Later Publications

Gandhi's writings expounded satyagraha as a philosophy of non-violent resistance rooted in ahimsa, positing non-violence not as passive restraint but as an active ethical force capable of transforming oppressors through moral suasion and self-suffering.[155] This framework, detailed in texts like Hind Swaraj (1909), critiqued modern civilization's materialist excesses while advocating decentralized self-rule (swaraj) and ethical economics, influencing anti-colonial and environmental thought by emphasizing human-scale production and voluntary simplicity over industrial scalability.[246] Empirical applications, such as the 1930 Salt Satyagraha involving over 60,000 arrests without retaliatory violence, demonstrated satyagraha's causal mechanism: exposing injustice to erode the aggressor's legitimacy, though outcomes depended on participant discipline and opponent responsiveness.[247] The intellectual ripple extended to conflict resolution paradigms, where Gandhi's insistence on truth (satya) as the ultimate arbiter subordinated political ends to means, challenging utilitarian justifications for violence in favor of long-term moral integrity.[248] This resonated in post-1945 discourses on peace, with Gandhi's essays in Young India (1919–1932) providing primary evidence for interpreting non-violence as a scalable alternative to armed struggle, albeit critiqued for underestimating power asymmetries in non-democratic contexts.[249] His vegetarianism and asceticism, chronicled in dietary experiments documented from 1910 onward, further shaped ethical vegetarianism by linking personal purity to social reform, influencing later advocates of animal rights through ahimsa's extension beyond humans.[250] Posthumously, The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi, a 100-volume compilation of over 50,000 pages including letters, speeches, and articles spanning 1884–1948, was initiated by the Indian government in 1956 and published from 1958 to 1994 by the Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting.[251] Edited primarily by Pyarelal N. Desai over 38 years, the series preserved untranslated Gujarati originals alongside English renderings, enabling rigorous scrutiny of Gandhi's thought evolution amid biases in selective earlier anthologies.[252] These volumes have supported reassessments, revealing inconsistencies like Gandhi's conditional endorsement of violence in extreme self-defense (e.g., 1920 writings on communal riots), thus informing debates on non-violence's pragmatic limits rather than idealized absolutism.[253]

Legacy and Modern Reassessments

Role in Indian Independence and "Father of the Nation" Title

Gandhi assumed leadership within the Indian National Congress (INC) by 1921, transforming it into a mass-based organization through campaigns emphasizing satyagraha (non-violent resistance) and swadeshi (self-reliance).[254] He launched the Non-Cooperation Movement on September 4, 1920, calling for boycotts of British goods, schools, courts, and titles, which drew millions of participants including Hindus and Muslims allied via the Khilafat Movement.[255] The movement was abruptly withdrawn on February 12, 1922, following the Chauri Chaura incident where protesters killed 22 policemen, highlighting Gandhi's insistence on absolute non-violence despite growing momentum.[256]
Mahatma Gandhi in traditional attire
Mahatma Gandhi during India's independence struggle
In the Civil Disobedience Movement, Gandhi organized the Salt March from March 12 to April 6, 1930, leading 78 followers on a 240-mile trek from Sabarmati Ashram to Dandi, where he violated the British salt monopoly by evaporating seawater to produce salt, sparking nationwide defiance and over 60,000 arrests.[257] This culminated in the Gandhi-Irwin Pact of March 5, 1931, granting minor concessions like reduced sentences but failing to secure dominion status, after which Gandhi attended the Second Round Table Conference in London from September to December 1931, which yielded no substantive progress. The Quit India Movement, initiated with Gandhi's "Do or Die" speech on August 8, 1942, demanded immediate British withdrawal amid World War II; it led to mass protests, sabotage of infrastructure, and over 100,000 arrests, but was harshly suppressed by British forces, resulting in thousands of deaths and Gandhi's own imprisonment until May 6, 1944.[258] While Gandhi's strategies mobilized unprecedented public participation and eroded British moral authority through symbolic defiance, empirical assessments indicate they were not the decisive factor in independence.[259] Britain's post-World War II exhaustion—marked by £3 billion in war debts, 400,000 military casualties, and economic collapse—combined with the Royal Indian Navy mutiny in February 1946 and Indian National Army trials that fueled unrest, compelled withdrawal more than non-violent campaigns alone.[260] Critics, including historians, argue Gandhi's repeated suspensions of agitation upon outbreaks of violence prolonged subjugation, as militant efforts by figures like Subhas Chandra Bose and underground revolutionaries applied direct pressure absent in pure satyagraha.[261] Negotiations under the Cabinet Mission Plan in 1946 and Lord Mountbatten's accelerated partition on August 15, 1947, reflected pragmatic British capitulation to multifaceted Indian resistance and imperial overstretch rather than non-violence's triumph.[262]
Statue of Mahatma Gandhi with Indian flag
Statue of Mahatma Gandhi, revered as Father of the Nation
The title "Father of the Nation" (Deshbandhu or Rashtrapita) was first applied to Gandhi by Subhas Chandra Bose in a radio address from Singapore on July 6, 1944, acknowledging his unifying influence amid Bose's own armed struggle via the Indian National Army.[263] [264] Jawaharlal Nehru popularized it in a February 1948 condolence broadcast following Gandhi's assassination, but the Indian government has stated no formal conferral occurred, either pre- or post-independence.[265] This honorary appellation, evoking paternal symbolism, persists in official discourse despite debates over its accuracy, given Gandhi's opposition to partition—which he accepted only under duress—and the roles of other leaders like Sardar Patel in integrating 562 princely states, which arguably ensured India's territorial cohesion.[266] Proponents credit Gandhi with forging national consciousness, yet detractors note the title overlooks systemic factors and contributions from diverse ideologies, including violence that complemented his pacifism.[259]

Global Influence on Non-Violence and Civil Rights

Gandhi's philosophy of satyagraha, emphasizing non-violent resistance and civil disobedience to expose injustice and appeal to the moral conscience of oppressors, gained international attention following his campaigns in India, particularly the Salt March of 1930, which mobilized over 60,000 arrests and highlighted British colonial exploitation.[267] This approach influenced civil rights leaders worldwide by providing a model for mass mobilization without arms, though its efficacy often depended on media amplification of state repression and the oppressors' sensitivity to public opinion.[268] In the United States, Martin Luther King Jr. explicitly credited Gandhi's methods for shaping the civil rights movement, stating after his 1959 visit to India that Gandhi's nonviolence was "the guiding light" for the Montgomery Bus Boycott of 1955–1956, which desegregated public transport in Montgomery, Alabama, after 381 days of sustained protest involving over 40,000 participants.[269] King adapted satyagraha into campaigns like the 1963 Birmingham protests, where non-violent marches against segregation drew brutal police responses—documented in over 3,000 arrests and televised attacks on children—pressuring federal intervention and contributing to the Civil Rights Act of 1964.[270] Other U.S. figures, including James Farmer and Bayard Rustin, drew on Gandhian principles for tactics like Freedom Rides in 1961, which challenged interstate bus segregation and led to Supreme Court enforcement of desegregation rulings.[271] Nelson Mandela and the African National Congress (ANC) initially incorporated Gandhian nonviolence, rooted in Gandhi's own South African satyagraha campaigns from 1906–1914 against discriminatory laws. Both Mandela and Gandhi made profound personal sacrifices for their people's freedom from colonial and racial oppression: Gandhi developed Satyagraha, enduring multiple imprisonments, hunger strikes risking death, and simple ascetic living, culminating in his 1948 assassination; influenced by Gandhi, Mandela spent 27 years imprisoned (1962-1990) for opposing apartheid, forgoing family life and health, while initially supporting armed resistance before shifting to reconciliation to avert civil war.[272] However, the ANC abandoned nonviolence by the 1960s due to the apartheid regime's escalating violence, including the Sharpeville Massacre of 1960 where police killed 69 unarmed protesters.[273] Mandela acknowledged Gandhi's inspiration for passive resistance but argued in his 1994 autobiography Long Walk to Freedom that armed struggle via Umkhonto we Sizwe became necessary when nonviolence failed to deter state terror, marking a pragmatic limit to Gandhi's global applicability against totalitarian oppression.[274] Cesar Chavez applied Gandhian tactics in the United Farm Workers (UFW) movement, launching a 1965 grape boycott that enlisted 17 million consumers and secured contracts with 26 California growers by 1970 through non-violent strikes, marches—like the 1966 pilgrimage from Delano to Sacramento covering 340 miles—and fasts mirroring Gandhi's 21-day Salt March fast in 1932.[275] Chavez's 1968 fast, lasting 25 days and drawing 8,000 supporters, reinforced worker solidarity without violence, though the UFW's long-term gains waned amid internal divisions and grower resistance, illustrating nonviolence's strength in generating sympathy but challenges in sustaining economic leverage.[276] Critics, including historians assessing post-colonial outcomes, note that Gandhi's influence promoted nonviolence as morally superior but question its standalone effectiveness; for instance, India's 1947 independence owed as much to Britain's post-World War II exhaustion—having mobilized 2.5 million Indian troops and faced $10 billion in war costs—as to satyagraha, while in contexts like apartheid South Africa, pure nonviolence yielded limited concessions before hybrid strategies prevailed.[239] Despite these limitations, Gandhi's framework inspired over 50 documented nonviolent campaigns globally by the late 20th century, per comparative studies, by framing resistance as a contest of wills rather than force.[267]

Economic and Developmental Critiques

Gandhi advocated for an economy centered on self-sufficient village communities, emphasizing decentralized production through cottage industries like hand-spinning khadi cloth, while opposing large-scale mechanization and industrialization as sources of exploitation and moral degradation.[277] In works such as Hind Swaraj (1909), he critiqued modern machinery for multiplying human wants, displacing labor, and fostering dependency, proposing instead that villages produce essentials locally to achieve swadeshi self-reliance.[278] This vision prioritized ethical simplicity and rural autonomy over capital-intensive growth, influencing movements like the 1920s khadi promotion, which aimed to revive village economies but required boycotting imported and mill-produced goods.[279] Critics, including B.R. Ambedkar, argued that Gandhi's village-centric model romanticized agrarian backwardness and perpetuated systemic inefficiencies, with Ambedkar describing the Indian village as "a sink of localism, a den of ignorance, narrow-mindedness and communalism" that entrenched caste oppression and economic stagnation rather than fostering progress.[280] Ambedkar contended that self-sufficiency through small-scale industries ignored the need for urbanization and large-scale machinery to break feudal structures and enable Dalit emancipation, favoring instead industrial development to absorb rural labor and reduce dependency on exploitative village economies.[281] Empirical assessments highlight khadi's impracticality, as hand-spun and hand-woven cloth cost significantly more than mill-produced alternatives—often 3-5 times higher due to labor intensity—imposing a financial burden on impoverished consumers during boycotts, while yielding low productivity and failing to scale for mass needs.[282][283] Broader developmental critiques posit that Gandhi's aversion to industrialization delayed India's technological adoption and capital accumulation, potentially condemning it to persistent poverty if fully implemented, as evidenced by the inefficiencies of decentralized models in generating surplus for infrastructure or education compared to mechanized economies elsewhere.[284] Although post-1947 policies under Nehru diverged toward heavy industry, residual Gandhian influences in rural-focused planning contributed to India's "Hindu rate of growth" averaging 3.5% annually from 1950-1980, marked by low productivity in unmechanized agriculture and village industries that comprised over 70% of employment but minimal GDP contribution.[285][286] Economists note that such approaches undervalued scale economies and innovation, contrasting with East Asian tigers' rapid industrialization, and perpetuated autarkic policies that stifled exports until 1991 liberalization spurred acceleration to 6-8% growth.[287] These views, often from market-oriented analysts skeptical of romanticized pre-industrial ideals, underscore causal links between anti-modern stances and foregone opportunities for poverty alleviation through productive investment.[288]

Contemporary Debates: Statues, Politics, and Reinterpretations (Post-2000)

Worker cleaning large bronze statue of Mahatma Gandhi
A worker pressure-washes a statue of Mahatma Gandhi in a public garden
In the early 21st century, Mahatma Gandhi's legacy has faced renewed scrutiny amid global movements questioning colonial-era figures, leading to debates over the retention of his statues worldwide. A prominent case occurred at the University of Ghana, where a statue unveiled in 2016 was removed on December 13, 2018, following petitions citing Gandhi's early writings in South Africa that expressed derogatory views toward Black Africans, such as referring to them as "savages" or inferior to Indians.[289][290] Critics, including Ghanaian academics and activists, argued these statements reflected racial hierarchy, though defenders noted Gandhi's views evolved over time through his anti-apartheid activism. Similar petitions emerged in the United States; in 2018-2019, student groups at universities like Carleton College and the University of California, Davis, called for statue removals on grounds of alleged racism and casteism, resulting in the Davis statue's forcible removal in January 2021 after vandalism.[291] Vandalism incidents proliferated, including spray-painting of the statue outside the Indian Embassy in Washington, D.C., in June 2020 with anti-India graffiti, and defacement in Melbourne, Australia, in November 2021 shortly after its installation.[292][293] These actions often drew from selective excerpts of Gandhi's pre-1910 correspondence, prompting counterarguments that such reinterpretations ignore his later advocacy for interracial equality and overlook contextual shifts in his thought.[294]
Narendra Modi with hands folded before Mahatma Gandhi statue
Prime Minister Narendra Modi pays respects at the Mahatma Gandhi statue in Parliament Square, London
In India, political debates post-2000 have intensified under the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) governments since 2014, with the ruling Hindu nationalist coalition both invoking Gandhi's symbols—like promoting Swachh Bharat (Clean India) campaigns echoing his sanitation emphasis—and facing accusations of eroding his secular, non-violent ethos. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has referenced Gandhi's ideas on self-reliance and khadi (hand-spun cloth) in economic policies, yet critics from the opposition Congress party, including Sonia Gandhi in December 2024, claimed his legacy was "under threat" from BJP-RSS influences that allegedly glorify Nathuram Godse, Gandhi's assassin, through cultural productions like the 2018 play "Herr Godse, Herr Hitler."[295][296] On the right, some BJP affiliates and Hindutva advocates have criticized Gandhi for purportedly prioritizing Muslim appeasement via the Khilafat Movement, which they link causally to the 1947 Partition's violence and displacement of millions, arguing his fasts against partition payments to Pakistan in 1948 exacerbated Hindu suffering.[297] These tensions peaked around India's 75th independence anniversary in 2022, where public discourse derided Gandhi as overly conciliatory toward minorities, contrasting with his historical portrayal as the "Father of the Nation."[297] These sentiments have been reflected in contemporary opinion journalism. An article published in The India Review titled "Is Mahatma Gandhi losing his shine in India?" questions whether Gandhi's moral and cultural stature is declining in modern India amid evolving political ideologies and public perceptions. Scholarly reinterpretations post-2000 have emphasized empirical reexaminations of Gandhi's writings and actions, often challenging hagiographic narratives. Biographer Ramachandra Guha, in works like "Gandhi: The Years That Changed the World" (2018), portrayed him as a pragmatic strategist whose non-violence succeeded contextually but faltered against entrenched communalism, while acknowledging personal eccentricities like celibacy experiments.[298] Critics, including Dalit activists, have highlighted Gandhi's defense of varnashrama (caste system as hereditary occupations) against B.R. Ambedkar's annihilation of caste, interpreting it as perpetuating Brahminical hierarchy despite his anti-untouchability campaigns.[299] Global analyses, such as those in decolonial studies, revisit his South African period for racial essentialism but note evidentiary limits, as petitions rely on uncontextualized quotes amid broader evidence of his alliances with African leaders like John Dube.[293] In political theory, post-2000 reviews contrast Gandhi's ahimsa with modern realpolitik, questioning its causal efficacy in averting Partition's 1-2 million deaths, with some attributing delays in independence to his 1930s-1940s negotiations favoring elite compromises over mass mobilization. These debates reflect polarized source bases, with academic critiques often from progressive institutions potentially biased toward identity politics, while Indian right-wing reassessments prioritize partition's human costs over symbolic non-violence.[299][300]

References

User Avatar
No comments yet.