Manichaeism
View on Wikipedia
| Manichaeism | |
|---|---|
| آیینِ مانی 摩尼教 | |
Sealstone of Mani, rock crystal, possibly 3rd century AD, Iraq. Cabinet des Médailles, Paris.[1][2] The seal reads "Mani, messenger of the messiah", and may have been used by Mani himself to sign his letters.[3][1] | |
| Type | Universal religion |
| Classification | Iranian religion |
| Scripture | Manichaean scripture |
| Theology | Dualistic |
| Region | Historical: Europe, East Asia, Central Asia, West Asia, North Africa, Siberia |
| Language | Middle Persian, Classical Syriac, Parthian, Classical Latin, Classical Chinese, Old Uyghur language, Tocharian B, Sogdian language, Greek |
| Founder | Mani |
| Origin | 3rd century AD Parthian Empire, Sasanian Empire |
| Separated from | Jewish Christian Elcesaite sect, and the teachings of Jesus, Buddha, and Zoroaster |
| Separations | |
| Part of a series on |
| Manichaeism |
|---|
Manichaeism[a] (/ˌmænɪˈkiːɪzəm/;[9] in Persian: آئین مانی, romanized: Āʾīn-ī Mānī; Chinese: 摩尼教; pinyin: Móníjiào) is a former major world religion founded in the 3rd century CE by the Parthian[10] prophet Mani (A.D. 216–274), in the Sasanian Empire.[11]
Manichaeism taught an elaborate dualistic cosmology describing the struggle between a good spiritual world of light, and an evil material world of darkness.[12] Through an ongoing process that takes place in human history, light is gradually removed from the world of matter and returned to the world of light, whence it came. Mani's teaching was intended to "combine",[13] succeed, and surpass the teachings of Platonism,[14][15] Christianity, Zoroastrianism, Buddhism, Marcionism,[13] Hellenistic and Rabbinic Judaism, Gnostic movements, Ancient Greek religion, Babylonian and other Mesopotamian religions,[16] and mystery cults.[17][18] It reveres Mani as the final prophet after Zoroaster, the Buddha, and Jesus.
Manichaeism was quickly successful and spread far through Aramaic-speaking regions.[19] It thrived between the third and seventh centuries, and at its height was one of the most widespread religions in the world. Manichaean churches and scriptures existed as far east as China and as far west as the Roman Empire.[20] Before the spread of Islam, it was briefly the main rival to early Christianity in the competition to replace classical polytheism. Under the Roman Dominate, Manichaeism was persecuted by the Roman state and was eventually stamped out in the Roman Empire.[21]
Manichaeism survived longer in the east than it did in the west. The religion was present in West Asia into the Abbasid Caliphate period in the 10th century. It was also present in China despite increasingly strict proscriptions under the Tang dynasty and was the official religion of the Uyghur Khaganate until its collapse in 830. It experienced a resurgence under the Mongol Yuan dynasty during the 13th and 14th centuries but was subsequently banned by the Chinese emperors, and Manichaeism there became subsumed into Buddhism and Taoism.[22] Some historic Manichaean sites still exist in China, including the temple of Cao'an in Jinjiang, Fujian, and the religion may have influenced later movements in Europe, including Paulicianism, Bogomilism, and Catharism.
While most of Manichaeism's original writings have been lost, numerous translations and fragmentary texts have survived.[23]
Terminology
[edit]The spelling Manichaeism is a hypercorrection of Manichaism,[4][5][6] which derives from Koine Greek Μανιχαϊσμός[7] Manikhaïsmós via Latin Manichaismus.[8] The Greek word is built on Μανιχαῖος Manikhaîos ('Manichaeus'), one of the names of Mani in Greek sources.
In English, an adherent of Manichaeism is called a Manichaean, Manichean, or Manichee.[24]
History
[edit]Life of Mani
[edit]

Mani was an Iranian[25][26][b] born in 216 CE in or near Ctesiphon (now al-Mada'in, Iraq) in the Parthian Empire. According to the Cologne Mani-Codex,[27] Mani's parents were members of the Jewish Christian Gnostic sect known as the Elcesaites.[28]
Mani composed seven works, six of which were written in the late-Aramaic Syriac language. The seventh, the Shabuhragan,[29] was written by Mani in Middle Persian and presented by him to Sasanian emperor Shapur I. Although there is no proof Shapur I was a Manichaean, he tolerated the spread of Manichaeism and refrained from persecuting it within his empire's boundaries.[30]
According to one tradition, Mani invented the unique version of the Syriac script known as the Manichaean alphabet[31] that was used in all of the Manichaean works written within the Sasanian Empire, whether they were in Syriac or Middle Persian, as well as most of the works written within the Uyghur Khaganate. The primary language of Babylon (and the administrative and cultural language of the Empire) at that time was Eastern Middle Aramaic, which included three main dialects: Jewish Babylonian Aramaic (the language of the Babylonian Talmud), Mandaean (the language of Mandaeism), and Syriac, which was the language of Mani as well as the Syriac Christians.[32]

While Manichaeism was spreading, existing religions such as Zoroastrianism were still prevalent, and Christianity was gaining social and political influence. Although having fewer adherents, Manichaeism won the support of many high-ranking political figures. With the assistance of the Sasanian Empire, Mani began missionary expeditions. After failing to win the favour of the next generation of Persian royalty and incurring the disapproval of the Zoroastrian clergy, Mani is reported to have died in prison awaiting execution by the Persian emperor Bahram I. The date of his death is estimated at 276–277 CE.
Influences
[edit]
Mani believed that the teachings of Buddha, Zoroaster,[33] and Jesus were incomplete, and that his revelations were for the entire world, calling his teachings the "Religion of Light". Manichaean writings indicate that Mani received revelations when he was twelve years old and again when he was 24, and over this period, he grew dissatisfied with the Elcesaites, the Jewish Christian Gnostic sect he was born into.[34] Some researchers also point to an important Jain influence on Mani as extreme degrees of asceticism and some specific features of Jain doctrine made the influence of Mahāvīra's religious community more plausible than even the Buddha.[35] Fynes (1996) argues that various Jain influences, particularly ideas on the existence of plant souls, were transmitted from Western Kshatrapa territories to Mesopotamia and then integrated into Manichaean beliefs.[36]
Mani wore colorful clothing abnormal for the time that reminded some Romans of a stereotypical Persian magus or warlord, earning him ire from the Greco-Roman world because of it.[37]
Mani taught how the soul of a righteous individual returns to Paradise upon dying, but "the soul of the person who persisted in things of the flesh – fornication, procreation, possessions, cultivation, harvesting, eating of meat, drinking of wine – is condemned to rebirth in a succession of bodies."[38]
Mani began preaching at an early age and was possibly influenced by contemporary Babylonian-Aramaic movements such as Mandaeism, Aramaic translations of Jewish apocalyptic works similar to those found at Qumran (e.g., the Book of Enoch literature), and by the Syriac dualist-Gnostic writer Bardaisan (who lived a generation before Mani). With the discovery of the Mani-Codex, it also became clear that he was raised in the Jewish Christian sect of the Elcasaites and possibly influenced by their writings.[citation needed]
According to biographies preserved by ibn al-Nadim and the Persian polymath al-Biruni, Mani received a revelation as a youth from a spirit, whom he would later call his "Twin" (Imperial Aramaic: תאומא tɑʔwmɑ, from which is also derived the Greek name of Thomas the Apostle, Didymus; the "twin"), Syzygos (Koine Greek: σύζυγος "spouse, partner", in the Cologne Mani-Codex), "Double," "Protective Angel," or "Divine Self." This spirit taught him wisdom that he then developed into a religion. It was his "Twin" who brought Mani to self-realization. Mani claimed to be the Paraclete of the Truth promised by Jesus in the New Testament.[39]

Manichaeism's views on Jesus are described by historians:
Jesus in Manichaeism possessed three separate identities:
(1) Jesus the Luminous,
(2) Jesus the Messiah and
(3) Jesus patibilis (the suffering Jesus).
(1) As Jesus the Luminous ... his primary role was as supreme revealer and guide and it was he who woke Adam from his slumber and revealed to him the divine origins of his soul and its painful captivity by the body and mixture with matter.
(2) Jesus the Messiah was an historical being who was the prophet of the Jews and the forerunner of Mani. However, the Manichaeans believed he was wholly divine, and that he never experienced human birth, as the physical realities surrounding the notions of his conception and his birth filled the Manichaeans with horror. However, the Christian doctrine of virgin birth was also regarded as obscene. Since Jesus the Messiah was the light of the world, where was this light, they reasoned, when Jesus was in the womb of the Virgin? Jesus the Messiah, they believed, was truly born only at his baptism, as it was on that occasion that the Father openly acknowledged his sonship. The suffering, death and resurrection of this Jesus were in appearance only as they had no salvific value but were an exemplum of the suffering and eventual deliverance of the human soul and a prefiguration of Mani's own martyrdom.
(3) The pain suffered by the imprisoned Light-Particles in the whole of the visible universe, on the other hand, was real and immanent. This was symbolized by the mystic placing of the Cross whereby the wounds of the passion of our souls are set forth. On this mystical Cross of Light was suspended the Suffering Jesus (Jesus patibilis) who was the life and salvation of Man. This mystica crucifixio was present in every tree, herb, fruit, vegetable and even stones and the soil. This constant and universal suffering of the captive soul is exquisitely expressed in one of the Coptic Manichaean psalms.[40]
Augustine of Hippo also noted that Mani declared himself to be an "apostle of Jesus Christ".[41] Manichaean tradition is also noted to have claimed that Mani was the reincarnation of religious figures from previous eras such as the Buddha, Krishna, and Zoroaster in addition to Jesus himself.
Academics note that much of what is known about Manichaeism comes from later 10th- and 11th-century Muslim historians like al-Biruni and ibn al-Nadim in his al-Fihrist; the latter "ascribed to Mani the claim to be the Seal of the Prophets."[42] However, given the Islamic milieu of Arabia and Persia at the time, it stands to reason that Manichaens would regularly assert in their evangelism that Mani, not Muhammad, was the "Seal of the Prophets".[43] In reality, for Mani the metaphorical expression "Seal of Prophets" is not a reference to his finality in a long succession of prophets as it is used in Islam, but rather as final to his followers (who testify or attest to his message as a "seal").[44][45]

Other sources of Mani's scripture were the Aramaic originals of the Book of Enoch, 2 Enoch, and an otherwise unknown section of the Book of Enoch entitled The Book of Giants. Mani quoted the latter directly and expanded upon it, making it one of the six original Syriac writings of the Manichaean Church. Besides short references by non-Manichaean authors through the centuries, no original sources of The Book of Giants (which is actually part six of the Book of Enoch) were available until the 20th century.[46]
Scattered fragments of both the original Aramaic Book of Giants (which were analyzed and published by Józef Milik in 1976)[47] and the Manichaean version of the same name (analyzed and published by Walter Bruno Henning in 1943)[48] were discovered along with the Dead Sea Scrolls in the Judaean desert in the 20th century and the Manichaean writings of the Uyghur Manichaean kingdom in Turpan. Henning wrote in his analysis of them:
It is noteworthy that Mani, who was brought up and spent most of his life in a province of the Persian empire, and whose mother belonged to a famous Parthian family, did not make any use of the Iranian mythological tradition. There can no longer be any doubt that the Iranian names of Sām, Narīmān, etc., that appear in the Persian and Sogdian versions of the Book of the Giants, did not figure in the original edition, written by Mani in the Syriac language.[48]
By comparing the cosmology of the books of Enoch to the Book of Giants, as well as the description of the Manichaean myth, scholars have observed that the Manichaean cosmology can be described as being based, in part, on the description of the cosmology developed in detail within the Enochic literature.[49] This literature describes the being that the prophets saw in their ascent to Heaven as a king who sits on a throne at the highest of the heavens. In the Manichaean description, this being, the "Great King of Honor", becomes a deity who guards the entrance to the World of Light placed at the seventh of ten heavens.[50] In the Aramaic Book of Enoch, the Qumran writings, overall, and in the original Syriac section of Manichaean scriptures quoted by Theodore bar Konai,[51] he is called malkā rabbā d-iqārā ("the Great King of Honor").[citation needed]
Mani was also influenced by writings of the gnostic Bardaisan (154–222 CE), who, like Mani, wrote in Syriac and presented a dualistic interpretation of the world in terms of light and darkness in combination with elements from Christianity.[52]
Mani was heavily inspired by Iranian Zoroastrian theology.[33]

Noting Mani's travels to the Kushan Empire (several religious paintings in Bamyan are attributed to him) at the beginning of his proselytizing career, Richard Foltz postulates Buddhist influences in Manichaeism:
Buddhist influences were significant in the formation of Mani's religious thought. The transmigration of souls became a Manichaean belief, and the quadripartite structure of the Manichaean community, divided between male and female monks (the "elect") and lay followers (the "hearers") who supported them, appears to be based on that of the Buddhist sangha.[53]
The Kushan monk Lokakṣema began translating Pure Land Buddhist texts into Chinese in the century prior to Mani arriving there. The Chinese texts of Manichaeism are full of uniquely Buddhist terms taken directly from these Chinese Pure Land scriptures, including the term "pure land" (Chinese: 淨土; pinyin: jìngtǔ) itself.[54] However, the central object of veneration in Pure Land Buddhism, Amitābha, the Buddha of Infinite Light, does not appear in Chinese Manichaeism and seems to have been replaced by another deity.[55]
Spread
[edit]Roman Empire
[edit]
Manichaeism reached Rome through the apostle Psattiq in 280, who was also in Egypt in 244 and 251. It flourished in the Faiyum in 290.
Manichaean monasteries existed in Rome in 312 during the time of Pope Miltiades.[56]
In 291, persecution arose in the Sasanian Empire with the murder of the apostle Sisin by Emperor Bahram II and the slaughter of many Manichaeans. Then, in 302, the first official reaction and legislation against Manichaeism from the Roman state was issued under Diocletian. In an official edict called the De Maleficiis et Manichaeis compiled in the Collatio Legum Mosaicarum et Romanarum and addressed to the proconsul of Africa, Diocletian wrote:
We have heard that the Manichaeans [...] have set up new and hitherto unheard-of sects in opposition to the older creeds so that they might cast out the doctrines vouchsafed to us in the past by the divine favour for the benefit of their own depraved doctrine. They have sprung forth very recently like new and unexpected monstrosities among the race of the Persians – a nation still hostile to us – and have made their way into our empire, where they are committing many outrages, disturbing the tranquility of our people and even inflicting grave damage to the civic communities. We have cause to fear that with the passage of time they will endeavour, as usually happens, to infect the modest and tranquil of an innocent nature with the damnable customs and perverse laws of the Persians as with the poison of a malignant (serpent) ... We order that the authors and leaders of these sects be subjected to severe punishment, and, together with their abominable writings, burnt in the flames. We direct their followers, if they continue recalcitrant, shall suffer capital punishment, and their goods be forfeited to the imperial treasury. And if those who have gone over to that hitherto unheard-of, scandalous and wholly infamous creed, or to that of the Persians, are persons who hold public office, or are of any rank or of superior social status, you will see to it that their estates are confiscated and the offenders sent to the (quarry) at Phaeno or the mines at Proconnesus. And in order that this plague of iniquity shall be completely extirpated from this our most happy age, let your devotion hasten to carry out our orders and commands.[57]
By 354, Hilary of Poitiers wrote that Manichaeism was a significant force in Roman Gaul. In 381, Christians requested Theodosius I to strip Manichaeans of their civil rights. Starting in 382, the emperor issued a series of edicts to suppress Manichaeism and punish its followers.[58]

Augustine of Hippo (354–430) converted to Christianity from Manichaeism in the year 387. This was shortly after the Roman emperor Theodosius I issued a decree of death for all Manichaean monks in 382 and shortly before he declared Christianity the only legitimate religion for the Roman Empire in 391. Due to the heavy persecution, the religion almost disappeared from Western Europe in the fifth century and from the eastern portion of the empire in the sixth century.[59]
According to his Confessions, after nine or ten years of adhering to the Manichaean faith as a member of the group of "hearers", Augustine of Hippo became a Christian and potent adversary of Manichaeism (which he expressed in writing against his Manichaean opponent Faustus of Mileve), seeing their beliefs that knowledge was the key to salvation as too passive and unable to affect any change in one's life.[60]
I still thought that it is not we who sin but some other nature that sins within us. It flattered my pride to think that I incurred no guilt and, when I did wrong, not to confess it ... I preferred to excuse myself and blame this unknown thing which was in me but was not part of me. The truth, of course, was that it was all my own self, and my own impiety had divided me against myself. My sin was all the more incurable because I did not think myself a sinner.[61]
Some modern scholars have suggested that Manichaean ways of thinking influenced the development of some of Augustine's ideas, such as the nature of good and evil, the idea of hell, the separation of groups into elect, hearers, and sinners, and the hostility to the flesh and sexual activity, and his dualistic theology.[62]

Central Asia
[edit]
Some Sogdians in Central Asia believed in the religion.[63][64] Uyghur khagan Boku Tekin (759–780) converted to the religion in 763 after a three-day discussion with its preachers,[65][66] the Babylonian headquarters sent high-rank clerics to Uyghur, and Manichaeism remained the state religion for about a century before the collapse of the Uyghur Khaganate in 840.[citation needed]
South Siberia
[edit]After the defeat of the Uighur Khaganate by the Yenisei Kyrgyz, Manichaeism spread north to the Khakass-Minusinsk depression. Archaeological excavations in the Uybat valley revealed the existence of a Manichaean center there, which included 6 temples and 5 sanctuaries of the elements, and architecturally it was similar to the Sogdian structures in Tuva and Xinjiang. In the 1970s, a Manichaean temple that existed in the 8th-10th centuries was excavated 90 km from the Uybat center in the Puyur-sukh valley. L.R Kyzlasov interpreted these finds as evidence of the adoption of Manichaeism as an official religion in the Kyrgyz Kaganate. Few Khakass Manichaean epitaphs confirm this version; the Manichaean script also influenced the Yenisei runic script at a late stage of its development. South Siberian Manichaeism existed before the Mongol conquest. Later, it influenced the formation of the culture of the Sayano-Altai Turks (Altaians, Khakas, Tuvans), as well as the Khants, Selkups, Kets and Evenks. This influence affected the everyday beliefs of the indigenous peoples and the lexical composition of their languages.[67]
China
[edit]In the east it spread along trade routes as far as Chang'an, the capital of Tang China.[68][69]
After the Tang dynasty, some Manichaean groups participated in peasant movements. Many rebel leaders used religion to mobilize followers. In Song and Yuan China, remnants of Manichaeism continued to leave a legacy contributing to sects such as the Red Turbans. During the Song dynasty, the Manichaeans were derogatorily referred by the Chinese as Chīcài shìmó (Chinese: 吃菜事魔, meaning that they "abstain from meat and worship demons").[70][71]
An account in Fozu Tongji, an important historiography of Buddhism in China compiled by Buddhist scholars during 1258–1269, says that the Manichaeans worshipped the "White Buddha" and their leader wore a violet headgear, while the followers wore white costumes. Many Manichaeans took part in rebellions against the Song government and were eventually quelled. After that, all governments were suppressive against Manichaeism and its followers, and the religion was banned in Ming China in 1370.[72][71] While it had long been thought that Manichaeism arrived in China only at the end of the seventh century, a recent[when?] archaeological discovery demonstrated that it was already known there in the second half of the 6th century.[73]
The nomadic Uyghur Khaganate lasted for less than a century (744–840) in the southern Siberian steppe, with the fortified city of Ordu-Baliq on the Upper Orkhon River as its capital.[74] Before the end of the year (763), Manichaeism was declared the official religion of the Uyghur state. Boku Tekin banned all the shamanistic rituals that had previously been in use. His subjects likely accepted his decision. That much results from a report that the proclamation of Manichaeism as the state religion was met with enthusiasm in Ordu-Baliq. In an inscription in which the Kaghan speaks for himself, he promised the Manichaen high priests (the "Elect") that if they gave orders, he would promptly follow them and respond to their requests. An incomplete manuscript found in the Turfan Oasis gives Boku Tekin the title of zahag-i Mani ("Emanation of Mani" or "Descendant of Mani"), a title of majestic prestige among the Manichaeans of Central Asia.
Nonetheless, and despite the apparently willing conversion of the Uyghurs to Manichaeanism, traces and signs of the previous shamanistic practices persisted. For instance, in 765, only two years after the official conversion, during a military campaign in China, the Uyghur troops called forth magicians to perform a number of specific rituals. Manichaean Uyghurs continued to treat with great respect a sacred forest in Otuken.[74] The conversion to Manichaeism led to an explosion of manuscript production in the Tarim Basin and Gansu (the region between the Tibetan and the Huangtu plateaus), which lasted well into the early 11th century. In 840, the Uyghur Khaganate collapsed under the attacks of the Yenisei Kyrgyz, and the new Uyghur state of Qocho was established with a capital in the city of Qocho.
Al-Jahiz (776–868 or 869) believed that the peaceful lifestyle that Manicheism brought to the Uyghurs was responsible for their later lack of military skills and eventual decline. This, however, is contradicted by the political and military consequences of the conversion. After the migration of the Uyghurs to Turfan in the ninth century, the nobility maintained Manichaean beliefs for a while before converting to Buddhism. Traces of Manicheism among the Uyghurs in Turfan may be detected in fragments of Uyghur Manichaean manuscripts. In fact, Manicheism continued to rival the influence of Buddhism among the Uyghurs until the 13th century. The Mongols gave the final blow to the Manichaeism among the Uyghurs.[74]
Tibet
[edit]Manichaeism spread to Tibet during the Tibetan Empire. There was a serious attempt made to introduce the religion to the Tibetans as the text Criteria of the Authentic Scriptures (a text attributed to the Tibetan Emperor Trisong Detsen) makes a great effort to attack Manichaeism by stating that Mani was a heretic who engaged in religious syncretism into a deviating and inauthentic form.[75]
Iran
[edit]Manichaeans in Iran tried to assimilate their religion along with Islam in the Muslim caliphates.[76] Relatively little is known about the religion during the first century of Islamic rule. During the early caliphates, Manichaeism attracted many followers. It had a significant appeal among Muslim society, especially among the elites. A part of Manichaeism that specifically appealed to the Sasanians was the Manichaean gods' names. The names Mani had assigned to the gods of his religion show identification with those of the Zoroastrian pantheon, even though some divine beings he incorporates are non-Iranian. For example, Jesus, Adam, and Eve were named Xradesahr, Gehmurd, and Murdiyanag. Because of these familiar names, Manichaeism did not feel completely foreign to the Zoroastrians.[77] Due to the appeal of its teachings, many Sasanians adopted the ideas of its theology and some even became dualists.
Not only were the citizens of the Sasanian Empire intrigued by Manichaeism, but so was the ruler at the time of its introduction, Sabuhr l. As the Denkard reports, Sabuhr, the first King of Kings, was very well-known for gaining and seeking knowledge of any kind. Because of this, Mani knew that Sabuhr would lend an ear to his teachings and accept him. Mani had explicitly stated while introducing his teachings to Sabuhr, that his religion should be seen as a reform of Zarathustra's ancient teachings.[77] This was of great fascination to the king, for it perfectly fit Sabuhr's dream of creating a large empire that incorporated all people and their different creeds. Thus, Manichaeism became widespread and flourished throughout the Sasanian Empire for thirty years. An apologia for Manichaeism ascribed to ibn al-Muqaffa' defended its phantasmagorical cosmogony and attacked the fideism of Islam and other monotheistic religions. The Manichaeans had sufficient structure to have a head of their community.[78][79][80]
Tolerance toward Manichaeism decreased after the death of Sabuhr I. His son, Ohrmazd, who became king, still allowed for Manichaeism in the empire, but he also greatly trusted the Zoroastrian priest, Kirdir. After Ohrmazd's short reign, his oldest brother, Wahram I, became king. Wahram I held Kirdir in high esteem, and he also had many different religious ideals than Ohrmazd and his father, Sabuhr I. Due to the influence of Kirdir, Zoroastrianism was strengthened throughout the empire, which in turn caused Manichaeism to be diminished. Wahram sentenced Mani to prison, and he died there.[77]
Arab world
[edit]That Manicheism went further on to the Arabian peninsula, up to the Hejaz and Mecca, where it could have possibly contributed to the formation of the doctrine of Islam, cannot be proven in pre-Islamic Arabia[81] and there was no existence of Manichaeism in the Hejaz.[82] Under the eighth-century Abbasid Caliphate, Arabic zindīq and the adjectival term zandaqa could denote many different things,[83] but it seems to have primarily—or at least initially—signified a follower of Manichaeism; however its true meaning is not known.[84] From the ninth century, it is reported that Caliph al-Ma'mun tolerated a community of Manichaeans.[85]
During the early Abbasid period, the Manichaeans underwent persecution. The third Abbasid caliph, al-Mahdi, persecuted the Manichaeans, establishing an inquisition against dualists who, if found guilty of heresy, refused to renounce their beliefs, were executed. Their persecution was ended in the 780s by Harun al-Rashid.[86][87] During the reign of the Caliph al-Muqtadir, many Manichaeans fled from Mesopotamia to Khorasan in fear of persecution, and the base of the religion was later shifted to Samarkand.[59][88]
Bactria
[edit]The first appearance of Manichaeism in Bactria was actually during Mani's lifetime. While he never physically traveled there, he did send a disciple by the name of Mar Ammo to spread his word. Mani "called (upon) Mar Ammo, the teacher, who knew the Parthian language and script, and was well acquainted with lords and ladies and with many nobles in those places..."[89]
Mar Ammo indeed did travel to the old Parthian lands of eastern Iran, which bordered Bactria. A translation of Persian texts states the following from the perspective of Mar Ammo: "They had arrived at the watch post of Kushān (Bactria), then the spirit of the border of the eastern province appeared in the shape of a girl, and he (the spirit) asked me 'Ammo what do you intend? From where have you come?' I said, 'I am a believer, a disciple of Mani, the Apostle.' That spirit said 'I do not receive you. Return from where you have come.'"
Despite the initial rejection Mar Ammo faced, the text records that Mani's spirit appeared to Mar Ammo and requested he persevere and read the chapter "The Collecting of the Gates" from The Treasure of the Living. Once he did so, the spirit returned, transformed, and said, "I am Bag Ard, the frontier guard of the Eastern Province. When I receive you, then the gate of the whole East will be opened in front of you." It seemed that this "border spirit" was a reference to the local Eastern Iranian goddess Ard-oxsho, who was prevalent in Bactria.[90]

Syncretism and translation
[edit]Manichaeism claimed to present the complete version of teachings that were corrupted and misinterpreted by the followers of Mani's predecessors Adam, Abraham, Noah,[13] Zoroaster, the Buddha, and Jesus.[91] Accordingly, as it spread, it adapted deities from other religions into forms it could use for its scriptures. Its original Eastern Middle Aramaic texts already contained stories of Jesus.
As the faith moved eastward and its scriptures were translated into Iranian languages, the names of the Manichaean deities were often transformed into the names of Zoroastrian yazatas. Thus, Abbā ḏəRabbūṯā ("The Father of Greatness"), the highest Manichaean deity of Light, in Middle Persian texts might either be translated literally as pīd ī wuzurgīh or substituted with the name of the deity Zurwān.
Similarly, the Manichaean primordial figure Nāšā Qaḏmāyā ("The Original Man") was rendered Ohrmazd Bay after the Zoroastrian god Ohrmazd. This process continued in Manichaeism's meeting with Chinese Buddhism, during which, for example, the original Aramaic קריא qaryā (the "call" from the World of Light to those seeking rescue from the World of Darkness) is identified in the Chinese-language scriptures with Guanyin (觀音 or Avalokiteśvara in Sanskrit, literally, "watching/perceiving sounds [of the world]", the bodhisattva of Compassion).[citation needed]
Manichaeism influenced some early texts and traditions of proto-orthodox and other forms of early Christianity, as well as doing the same for branches of Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Buddhism, and Islam.[92]
Persecution and suppression
[edit]Manichaeism was repressed by the Sasanian Empire.[76] In 291, persecution arose in the Persian empire with the murder of the apostle Sisin by Bahram II and the slaughter of many Manichaeans. In 296, the Roman emperor Diocletian decreed all the Manichaean leaders to be burnt alive along with the Manichaean scriptures, and many Manichaeans in Europe and North Africa were killed. It was not until 372 with Valentinian I and Valens that Manichaeism was legislated against again.[93]
Theodosius I issued a death decree for all Manichaean monks in 382.[94] The religion was vigorously attacked and persecuted by both the Christian Church and the Roman state, and the religion almost disappeared from western Europe in the fifth century and from the eastern portion of the empire in the sixth century.[59]

In 732, Emperor Xuanzong of Tang banned any Chinese from converting to the religion, saying it was a heretic religion, confusing people by claiming to be Buddhism. However, the foreigners who followed the religion were allowed to practice it without punishment.[96] After the fall of the Uyghur Khaganate in 840, which was the chief patron of Manichaeism (which was also the state religion of the Khaganate) in China, all Manichaean temples in China except in the two capitals and Taiyuan were closed down and never reopened since these temples were viewed as a symbol of foreign arrogance by the Chinese (see Cao'an). Even those that were allowed to remain open did not for long.[69]
The Manichaean temples were attacked by Chinese people who burned the images and idols of these temples. Manichaean priests were ordered to wear hanfu instead of traditional clothing, viewed as un-Chinese. In 843, Emperor Wuzong of Tang gave the order to kill all Manichaean clerics as part of the Huichang persecution of Buddhism, and over half died. They were made to look like Buddhists by the authorities; their heads were shaved, they were made to dress like Buddhist monks and then killed.[69]
Many Manichaeans took part in rebellions against the Song dynasty. They were quelled by Song China and were suppressed and persecuted by all successive governments before the Mongol Yuan dynasty. In 1370, the religion was banned through an edict of the Ming dynasty, whose Hongwu Emperor had a personal dislike for the religion.[69][71][97] Its core teaching influences many religious sects in China, including the White Lotus movement.[98]
According to Wendy Doniger, Manichaeism may have continued to exist in the Xinjiang region until the Mongol conquest in the 13th century.[99]
Manicheans also suffered persecution for some time under the Abbasid Caliphate of Baghdad. In 780, the third Abbasid Caliph, al-Mahdi, started a campaign of inquisition against those who were "dualist heretics" or "Manichaeans" called the zindīq. He appointed a "master of the heretics" (Arabic: صاحب الزنادقة ṣāhib al-zanādiqa), an official whose task was to pursue and investigate suspected dualists, who the Caliph then examined. Those found guilty who refused to recant their beliefs were executed.[86]
This persecution continued under his successor, Caliph al-Hadi, and continued for some time during the reign of Harun al-Rashid, who finally abolished it and ended it.[86] During the reign of the 18th Abbasid Caliph al-Muqtadir, many Manichaeans fled from Mesopotamia to Khorasan from fear of persecution by him and about 500 of them assembled in Samarkand. The base of the religion was later shifted to this city, which became their new Patriarchate.[59][88]
Manichaean pamphlets were still in circulation in Greek in 9th-century Byzantine Constantinople, as the patriarch Photios summarizes and discusses one that he has read by Agapius in his Bibliotheca.
Later movements associated with Manichaeism
[edit]During the Middle Ages, several movements emerged that were collectively described as "Manichaean" by the Catholic Church and persecuted as Christian heresies through the establishment of the Inquisition in 1184.[100] They included the Cathar churches of Western Europe. Other groups sometimes referred to as "neo-Manichaean" were the Paulician movement, which arose in Armenia,[101] and the Bogomils in Bulgaria and Serbia.[102] An example of this usage can be found in the published edition of the Latin Cathar text, the Liber de duobus principiis (Book of the Two Principles), which was described as "Neo-Manichaean" by its publishers.[103] As there is no presence of Manichaean mythology or church terminology in the writings of these groups, there has been some dispute among historians as to whether these groups were descendants of Manichaeism.[104]
Manichaeism could have influenced the Bogomils, Paulicians, and Cathars. However, these groups left few records, and the link between them and Manichaeans is tenuous. Regardless of its accuracy, the charge of Manichaeism was leveled at them by contemporary orthodox opponents, who often tried to make contemporary heresies conform to those combatted by the church fathers.[102]
Whether the dualism of the Paulicians, Bogomils, and Cathars and their belief that the world was created by a Satanic demiurge was due to influence from Manichaeism is impossible to determine. The Cathars apparently adopted the Manichaean principles of church organization. Priscillian and his followers may also have been influenced by Manichaeism. The Manichaeans preserved many apocryphal Christian works, such as the Acts of Thomas, that would otherwise have been lost.[102]
Legacy in present-day
[edit]Some sites are preserved in Xinjiang, Zhejiang, and Fujian in China.[105][106] The Cao'an temple is the most widely-known and best-preserved Manichaean building,[40]: 256–257 though it later became associated with Buddhism.[107] Local villagers near Cao'an still worship Mani, albeit with little distinction between Mani-as-Buddha and Gautama Buddha.[108] Other temples in China associated with Manichaeism remain standing, including the Xuanzhen Temple, noted for its stele.
Some platforms on the internet and social media are trying to spread some of the teachings of Manichaeism. Some people are registered in these electronic sources, and some scholars and students in the field of religious studies and the arts continue to study Manichaeism.[109]
In 2018, rituals were conducted for the Lin Deng 林瞪 (1003–1059), a Chinese Manichaean leader who lived during the Song dynasty in the three villages of Baiyang 柏洋村, Shangwan 上万村, and Tahou 塔后村 in Baiyang Township, Xiapu County, Fujian.[110]
Teachings and beliefs
[edit]
General
[edit]Mani's teaching dealt with the origin of evil by addressing a theoretical part of the problem of evil: denying the omnipotence of God and instead postulating two opposite divine powers. Manichaean theology teaches a dualistic view of good and evil. A fundamental belief in Manichaeism is that the powerful, though not omnipotent, good power (God) was opposed by the eternal evil power (the devil). Humanity, the world, and the soul are seen as the by-product of the battle between God's proxy—Primal Man—and the devil.[111]
The human person is seen as a battleground for these powers: the soul defines the person but is influenced by light and dark. This contention plays out over the world and the human body—neither the Earth nor the flesh were seen as intrinsically evil but instead possessed both light and dark portions. Natural phenomena such as rain were seen as the physical manifestation of this spiritual contention. Therefore, the Manichaean view explained the existence of evil by positing a flawed creation in the formation of which God took no part and which constituted instead the product of a battle by the devil against God.[111]
Cosmogony
[edit]
Manichaeism presents an elaborate conflict between the spiritual world of light and the material world of darkness. The beings of both the world of darkness and the world of light have names. There are numerous sources for the details of the Manichaean belief[example needed]. Two portions of the scriptures are probably the closest thing to the original writings, in their original languages, that will ever be available: the Syriac quotation by the Church of the East Christian Theodore bar Konai in his 8th century Syriac scholion, known as the Ketba de-Skolion,[51] and the Middle Persian sections of Mani's Shabuhragan discovered at Turpan—a summary of Mani's teachings prepared for Shapur I.[29]
From these and other sources[example needed], it is possible to derive a near-complete description of the detailed Manichaean cosmogony[112] (A complete list of Manichaean deities is outlined below). According to Mani,[citation needed]the unfolding of the universe took place in three phases:
- The First Creation
- Originally, good and evil existed in two completely separate realms: one, the World of Light (Chinese: 明界), ruled by the Father of Greatness together with his five Shekhinas (i.e., divine attributes of light), and the other, the World of Darkness, ruled by the King of Darkness. At a point in the distant past, the Kingdom of Darkness noticed the World of Light, coveted it, and attacked it. The Father of Greatness, in the first of three "calls" or "creations", called to the Mother of Life, who sent her son, Original Man (Imperial Aramaic: Nāšā Qaḏmāyā), to battle with the attacking powers of Darkness, which included the Demon of Greed.
- The Original Man was armed with five different shields of light (reflections of the five Shekhinas), which he lost to the forces of Darkness in the ensuing battle—described as a kind of "bait" to trick the forces of Darkness, who greedily consume as much light as they can. When the Original Man awakened, he was trapped among the forces of Darkness.
- The Second Creation
- The Father of Greatness then began the Second Creation. He called to the Living Spirit[specify], who then called to his sons and the Original Man, after which Call became a Manichaean deity proper. An answer — Answer — became another Manichaean deity, then went out from the Original Man into the World of Light. The Mother of Life, the Living Spirit, and the latter's five sons began to create the universe from the bodies of the evil beings of the World of Darkness and the light they had swallowed. Ten heavens and eight earths were created, all consisting of various mixtures of the evil material beings from the World of Darkness and the swallowed light. The sun, moon, and stars were all created from light recovered from the World of Darkness. The waxing and waning of the moon are described as the "moon filling with light", which passed to the sun, then through the Milky Way, and eventually back to the World of Light.
- The Third Creation
- Great demons (called archons in bar-Konai's account) were hung over the heavens, and the Father of Greatness began the Third Creation. The light was recovered from the material bodies of the evil beings and demons by causing them to become sexually aroused in greed toward beautiful images of the beings of light, such as the Third Messenger and the Virgins of Light. However, as soon as the light was expelled from their bodies and fell to the earth (sometimes in the form of abortions: the source of fallen angels in the Manichaean myth), the evil beings continued to swallow up as much of it as they could to keep the light inside themselves. The evil beings swallowed vast quantities of light, copulated, and produced Adam and Eve. The Father of Greatness then sent Jesus the Splendour to awaken Adam and enlighten him to the true source of the light trapped in his material body. Adam and Eve, however, also copulated and produced more human beings, trapping the light in the bodies of humankind throughout human history. The appearance of the Prophet Mani was another attempt by the World of Light to reveal to humanity the true source of the spiritual light imprisoned within their material bodies.
-
Analysis of Mani's cosmology as illustrated in the Manichaean Diagram
-
Heaven scene from the Manichaean Diagram
-
"Maiden of Light" from the Manichaean Diagram
Cosmology
[edit]In the sixth century, many Manichaeans saw the earth as "a rectangular parallelepiped enclosed by walls of crystal, above which three [sky] domes" existed, with the other two being above and larger than the first one and second one, respectively.[113] These represented the "three heavens" in Chaldean religion.[113]
Outline of the beings and events in the Manichaean mythology
[edit]Beginning with the time of its creation by Mani, the Manichaean religion has had a detailed description of deities and events that took place within the Manichaean scheme of the universe. In every language and region that Manichaeism spread to, these same deities reappear, whether it is in the original Syriac quoted by Theodore bar Konai,[51] or the Latin terminology given by Saint Augustine from Mani's Epistola Fundamenti, or the Persian and Chinese translations found as Manichaeism spread eastward. While the original Syriac retained the original description that Mani created, the transformation of the deities through other languages and cultures produced incarnations of the gods not implied in the original Syriac writings. Chinese translations are especially syncretic, borrowing and adapting terminology common in Chinese Buddhism.[114]
The World of Light
[edit]- The Father of Greatness (Syriac: ܐܒܐ ܕܪܒܘܬܐ Abbā dəRabbūṯā; Middle Persian: pīd ī wuzurgīh, or the Zoroastrian deity Zurwān; Parthian: Pidar wuzurgift, Pidar roshn; Chinese: 無上明尊; lit. 'Unsurpassed Divinity of Light' or 薩緩 lit. 'Zurvan')
| Shekhina: | Reason | Mind | Intelligence | Thought | Understanding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Syriac | ܗܘܢܐ hawnā | ܡܕܥܐ maddeʻā | ܪܥܝܢܐ reyānā | ܡܚܫܒܬܐ maḥšavṯɑ | ܬܪܥܝܬܐ tarʻiṯā |
| Parthian | bām | manohmēd | uš | andēšišn | parmānag |
| Chinese | 相 xiāng, "phase" | 心 xīn, "heart-mind" | 念 niàn, "mindfulness" | 思 sī, "thought" | 意 yì, "meaning" |
| Turkic | qut | ög | köngül | saqinç | tuimaq |
| Greek | νοῦς (Nous) | ἔννοια (Ennoia) | φρόνησις (Phronēsis) | ἐνθύμησις (Enthymēsis) | λογισμός (Logismos) |
| Latin | mens | sensus | prudentia | intellectus | cogitatio |
- The Great Spirit (Middle Persian: Waxsh zindag, Waxsh yozdahr; Latin: Spiritus Potens)
The first creation
[edit]- The Mother of Life (Syriac: ܐܡܐ ܕܚܝܐ imā dəḥayyē; Middle Persian: mʾdrʾy zyndgʾn; Chinese: 善母佛; lit. 'Good Mother Buddha')
- The First Man (Syriac: ܐܢܫܐ ܩܕܡܝܐ Nāšā Qaḏmāyā; Middle Persian: Ohrmazd Bay, the Zoroastrian god of light and goodness; Latin: Primus Homo)
- First Enthymesis (Middle Persian: hndyšyšn nxwysṯyn; Chinese: 先意; lit. 'First Understanding')
- His five Sons (the five Light Elements; Parthian: panj rōšn; Middle Persian: Amahrāspandān; Chinese: 五明子)[114]
- Ether (Parthian: ardāw; Middle Persian: frâwahr; Chinese: 氣)
- Wind (Parthian and Middle Persian: wād; Chinese: 風)
- Light (Parthian and Middle Persian: rōšn; Chinese: 明)
- Water (Parthian and Middle Persian: āb; Chinese: 水)
- Fire (Parthian and Middle Persian: ādur; Chinese: 火)
- His sixth Son, the Answer-God (Syriac: ܥܢܝܐ ʻanyā; Parthian and Middle Persian: xroshtag; Chinese: 勢至 Shì Zhì "The Power of Wisdom", a Chinese bodhisattva). The answer sent by the First Man to the Call from the World of Light.
- The Living Self (Parthian and Middle Persian: grīw zīndag, grīw rōšn; Chinese: 明性; lit. 'Light Nature') The anima mundi made up of the five Light Elements, identical with the Suffering Jesus who is crucified in the world.
The second creation
[edit]- The Friend of the Lights (Syriac: ܚܒܝܒ ܢܗܝܖܐ ḥaviv nehirē; Chinese: 樂明佛; lit. 'Enjoyer of Lights')[114] Calls to:
- The Great Builder (Syriac: ܒܢ ܖܒܐ ban rabbā; Chinese: 造相; lit. 'Creator of Forms') In charge of creating the new world that will separate the darkness from the light. He calls to:
- The Living Spirit (Syriac: ܪܘܚܐ ܚܝܐ ruḥā ḥayyā; Middle Persian: Mihryazd; Chinese: 淨活風; pinyin: Jìnghuófēng; Latin: Spiritus Vivens; Greek: Ζων Πνευμα). Acts as a demiurge, creating the structure of the material world.
- His five Sons (Syriac: ܚܡܫܐ ܒܢܘܗܝ ḥamšā benawhy; Chinese: 五等驍健子; lit. 'Five Valiant Sons')
- The Keeper of the Splendour (Syriac: ܨܦܬ ܙܝܘܐ ṣfat ziwā; Latin: Splenditenens; Chinese: 催光明使; lit. 'Urger of Enlightenment'). Holds up the ten heavens from above.
- The King of Glory (Syriac: ܡܠܟ ܫܘܒܚܐ mlex šuvḥā; Latin: Rex Gloriosus; Chinese: 地藏 Dìzàng "Earth Treasury", a Chinese bodhisattva).
- The Adamas of Light (Syriac: ܐܕܡܘܣ ܢܘܗܪܐ adamus nuhrā; Latin: Adamas; Chinese: 降魔使; pinyin: Jiàngmó shǐ). Fights with and overcomes an evil being in the image of the King of Darkness.
- The Great King of Honour (Syriac: ܡܠܟܐ ܪܒܐ ܕܐܝܩܪܐ malkā rabbā dikkārā; Dead Sea Scrolls Imperial Aramaic: מלכא רבא דאיקרא malka raba de-ikara; Latin: Rex Honoris; Chinese: 十天大王; pinyin: Shítiān Dàwáng; lit. 'Ten Heavens Great King'). A being that plays a central role in The Book of Enoch (originally written in Aramaic), as well as Mani's Syriac version of it, the Book of Giants. Sits in the seventh heaven of the ten heavens (corresponding to the celestial spheres, the first seven of which house the classical planets) and guards the entrance to the world of light. In the Syriac Aramaic account, the guarded entrance is called maṭarta (Syriac: ܡܛܪܬܐ maṭarta).
- Atlas (Syriac: ܣܒܠܐ sebblā; Latin: Atlas; Chinese: 持世主; pinyin: Chíshìzhǔ). Supports the eight worlds from below.
- His sixth Son, the Call-God (Syriac: ܩܪܝܐ qaryā; Middle Persian: Padvaxtag; Chinese: 觀音 Guanyin "watching/perceiving sounds [of the world]", the Chinese Bodhisattva of Compassion). Sent from the Living Spirit to awaken the First Man from his battle with the forces of darkness.
- His five Sons (Syriac: ܚܡܫܐ ܒܢܘܗܝ ḥamšā benawhy; Chinese: 五等驍健子; lit. 'Five Valiant Sons')
The third creation
[edit]- The Third Messenger (Syriac: ܐܝܙܓܕܐ izgaddā; Middle Persian: narēsahyazad, Parthian: hridīg frēštag; tertius legatus)
- Jesus the Splendour (Syriac: ܝܫܘܥ ܙܝܘܐ Ishoʻ Ziwā; Chinese: 光明夷數; lit. 'Jesus of Bright Light' or 夷數精和 lit. 'Jesus the Essence of Harmony'). He was sent to awaken Adam and Eve to the source of the spiritual light trapped within their bodies.
- The Maiden of Light (Middle Persian and Parthian: qnygrwšn; Chinese: 謹你嚧詵, a phonetic loan from Middle Persian)
- The Twelve Virgins of Light (Syriac: ܬܪܬܥܣܪܐ ܒܬܘܠܬܐ tratʻesrā btultē; Middle Persian: kanīgān rōšnān; Chinese: 日宮十二化女; pinyin: Rìgōng shí'èr huànǚ; lit. 'Sun Palace Twelve Maidens of Transformation').[c][114] Reflected in the twelve constellations of the Zodiac.
- The Column of Glory (Syriac: ܐܣܛܘܢ ܫܘܒܚܐ esṭun šuvḥā; Middle Persian: srōš-ahrāy; Chinese: 蘇露沙羅夷; pinyin: Sūlù shāluóyí and 盧舍那, Lúshěnà, both phonetic from Middle Persian: srōš-ahrāy). Souls' path to the World of Light corresponds to the Milky Way.
- The Great Nous
- The Just Judge (Parthian: d'dbr r'štygr; Chinese: 平等王; lit. 'Impartial King')[114]
- The Last God
The World of Darkness
[edit]- The Prince of Darkness (Syriac: ܡܠܟ ܚܫܘܟܐ mlex ḥešoxā; Middle Persian: Ahriman, the Zoroastrian supreme evil being)
- His five evil kingdoms Evil counterparts of the five elements of light, the lowest being the kingdom of Darkness.
- His son (Syriac: ܐܫܩܠܘܢ Ashaklun; Middle Persian: Az, from the Zoroastrian demon, Aži Dahāka)
- His son's mate (Syriac: ܢܒܪܘܐܠ Nevro'el)
- Their offspring – Adam and Eve (Middle Persian: Gehmurd and Murdiyanag)
- Giants (Fallen Angels, also Abortions): (Syriac: ܝܚܛܐ yaḥtē, "abortions" or "those that fell"; also: ܐܪܟܘܢܬܐ; Ἐγρήγοροι Egrēgoroi, "Giants"). Related to the story of the fallen angels in the Book of Enoch (which Mani used extensively in The Book of Giants), and the נפילים nephilim described in Genesis (6:1–4).
The Manichaean Church
[edit]Organization
[edit]The Manichaean Church was divided into the Elect, who had taken upon themselves the vows of Manichaeism, and the Hearers, those who had not, but still participated in the Church. The Elect were forbidden to consume alcohol and meat, as well as to harvest crops or prepare food, due to Mani's claim that harvesting was a form of murder against plants. The Hearers would therefore commit the sin of preparing food, and would provide it to the Elect, who would in turn pray for the Hearers and cleanse them of these sins.[117]
The terms for these divisions were already common since the days of early Christianity, however, it had a different meaning in Christianity. In Chinese writings, the Middle Persian and Parthian terms are transcribed phonetically (instead of being translated into Chinese).[118] These were recorded by Augustine of Hippo.[18]
- The Leader (Syriac: ܟܗܢܐ /kɑhnɑ/; Parthian: yamag; Chinese: 閻默; pinyin: yánmò), Mani's designated successor, seated as Patriarch at the head of the Church, originally in Ctesiphon, from the ninth century in Samarkand. Two notable leaders were Mār Sīsin (or Sisinnios), the first successor of Mani, and Abū Hilāl al-Dayhūri, an eighth-century leader.
- 12 Apostles (Latin: magistrī; Syriac: ܫܠܝܚܐ /ʃ(ə)liħe/; Middle Persian: možag; Chinese: 慕闍; pinyin: mùdū). Three of Mani's original apostles were Mār Pattī (Pattikios; Mani's father), Akouas and Mar Ammo.
- 72 Bishops (Latin: episcopī; Syriac: ܐܦܣܩܘܦܐ /ʔappisqoppe/; Middle Persian: aspasag, aftadan; Chinese: 薩波塞; pinyin: sàbōsāi or Chinese: 拂多誕; pinyin: fúduōdàn; see also: seventy disciples). One of Mani's original disciples who was specifically referred to as a bishop was Mār Addā.
- 360 Presbyters (Latin: presbyterī; Syriac: ܩܫܝܫܐ /qaʃʃiʃe/; Middle Persian: mahistan; Chinese: 默奚悉德; pinyin: mòxīxīdé)
- The general body of the Elect (Latin: ēlēctī; Syriac: ܡܫܡܫܢܐ /m(ə)ʃamməʃɑne/; Middle Persian: ardawan or dēnāwar; Chinese: 阿羅緩; pinyin: āluóhuǎn or Chinese: 電那勿; pinyin: diànnàwù)
- The Hearers (Latin: audītōrēs; Syriac: ܫܡܘܥܐ /ʃɑmoʿe/; Middle Persian: niyoshagan; Chinese: 耨沙喭; pinyin: nòushāyàn)
Religious practices
[edit]Prayers
[edit]From Manichaean sources, Manichaeans observed daily prayers: four for the hearers or seven for the elect. The sources differ about the exact time of prayer. The Fihrist by al-Nadim appoints them afternoon, mid-afternoon, just after sunset, and at nightfall. Al-Biruni places the prayers at dawn, sunrise, noon, and dusk. The elect additionally prayed at mid-afternoon, half an hour after nightfall, and midnight. Al-Nadim's account of daily prayers is probably adjusted to coincide with the public prayers for the Muslims, while Al-Biruni's report may reflect an older tradition unaffected by Islam.[119][120]
When Al-Nadim's account of daily prayers was the only detailed source available, there was a concern that Muslims only adopted these practices during the Abbasid Caliphate. However, it is clear that the Arabic text provided by Al-Nadim corresponds with the descriptions of Egyptian texts from the fourth century.[121]
Every prayer started with an ablution with water or, if water was not available, with other substances comparable to ablution in Islam,[122] and consisted of several blessings to the apostles and spirits. The prayer consisted of prostrating oneself to the ground and rising again twelve times during every prayer.[123] During the day, Manichaeans turned towards the Sun and during the night towards the Moon. If the Moon is not visible at night, they turned towards the north.[124]
Evident from Faustus of Mileve, Celestial bodies are not the subject of worship themselves but are "ships" carrying the light particles of the world to the supreme god, who cannot be seen, since he exists beyond time and space, and also the dwelling places for emanations of the supreme deity, such as Jesus the Splendour.[124] According to the writings of Augustine of Hippo, ten prayers were performed, the first devoted to the Father of Greatness, and the following to lesser deities, spirits, and angels and finally towards the elect, to be freed from rebirth and pain and to attain peace in the realm of light.[121] Comparably, in the Uyghur confession, four prayers are directed to the supreme God (Äzrua), the God of the Sun and the Moon, and fivefold God and the buddhas.[124]
Primary sources
[edit]
Mani wrote seven books, which contained the teachings of the religion. Only scattered fragments and translations of the originals remain, most having been discovered in Egypt and Turkistan during the 20th century.[38]
The original six Syriac writings are not preserved, although their Syriac names have been. There are also fragments and quotations from them. A long quotation, preserved by the eighth-century Nestorian Christian author Theodore Bar Konai,[51] shows that in the original Syriac Aramaic writings of Mani there was no influence of Iranian or Zoroastrian terms. The terms for the Manichaean deities in the original Syriac writings are in Aramaic. The adaptation of Manichaeism to the Zoroastrian religion appears to have begun in Mani's lifetime however, with his writing of the Middle Persian Shabuhragan, his book dedicated to the Sasanian emperor, Shapur I.[29]
In it, there are mentions of Zoroastrian divinities such as Ahura Mazda, Angra Mainyu, and Āz. Manichaeism is often presented as a Persian religion, mostly due to the vast number of Middle Persian, Parthian, and Sogdian (as well as Turkish) texts discovered by German researchers near Turpan in what is now Xinjiang, China, during the early 1900s. However, from the vantage point of its original Syriac descriptions (as quoted by Theodore Bar Khonai and outlined above), Manichaeism may be better described as a unique phenomenon of Aramaic Babylonia, occurring in proximity to two other new Aramaic religious phenomena, Talmudic Judaism and Mandaeism, which also appeared in Babylonia in roughly the third century.[citation needed]
The original, but now lost, six sacred books of Manichaeism were composed in Syriac Aramaic, and translated into other languages to help spread the religion. As they spread to the east, the Manichaean writings passed through Middle Persian, Parthian, Sogdian, Tocharian, and ultimately Uyghur and Chinese translations. As they spread to the west, they were translated into Greek, Coptic, and Latin. Most Manichaean texts survived only as Coptic and Medieval Chinese translations of their original, lost versions.[125]

Henning describes how this translation process evolved and influenced the Manichaeans of Central Asia:
Beyond doubt, Sogdian was the national language of the Majority of clerics and propagandists of the Manichaean faith in Central Asia. Middle Persian (Pārsīg), and to a lesser degree, Parthian (Pahlavānīg), occupied the position held by Latin in the medieval church. The founder of Manichaeism had employed Syriac (his own language) as his medium, but conveniently he had written at least one book in Middle Persian, and it is likely that he himself had arranged for the translation of some or all of his numerous writings from Syriac into Middle Persian. Thus the Eastern Manichaeans found themselves entitled to dispense with the study of Mani's original writings, and to continue themselves to reading the Middle Persian edition; it presented small difficulty to them to acquire a good knowledge of the Middle Persian language, owing to its affinity with Sogdian.[128]
Originally written in Syriac
[edit]- the Gospel of Mani (Syriac: ܐܘܢܓܠܝܘܢ /ʔɛwwanɡallijon/; Koine Greek: εὐαγγέλιον "good news, gospel"). Quotations from the first chapter were brought in Arabic by ibn al-Nadim, who lived in Baghdad at a time when there were still Manichaeans living there, in his 938 book, the Fihrist, a catalog of all written books known to him.
- The Treasure of Life
- The Treatise (Coptic: πραγματεία, pragmateia)
- Secrets
- The Book of Giants: Original fragments were discovered at Qumran (pre-Manichaean) and Turpan.
- Epistles: Augustine brings quotations, in Latin, from Mani's Fundamental Epistle in some of his anti-Manichaean works.
- Psalms and Prayers: A Coptic Manichaean Psalm Book, discovered in Egypt in the early 1900s, was edited and published by Charles Allberry from Manichaean manuscripts in the Chester Beatty collection and in the Berlin Academy, 1938–39.
Originally written in Middle Persian
[edit]- The Shabuhragan, dedicated to Shapur I: Original Middle Persian fragments were discovered at Turpan, quotations were brought in Arabic by al-Biruni.
Other books
[edit]- The Ardahang, the "Picture Book". In Iranian tradition, this was one of Mani's holy books that became remembered in later Persian history, and was also called Aržang, a Parthian word meaning "Worthy", and was beautified with paintings. Therefore, Iranians gave him the title of "The Painter".
- The Kephalaia of the Teacher (Κεφαλαια), "Discourses", found in Coptic translation.
- On the Origin of His Body, the title of the Cologne Mani-Codex, a Greek translation of an Aramaic book that describes the early life of Mani.[27]
Non-Manichaean works preserved by the Manichaean Church
[edit]- Portions of the Book of Enoch literature such as the Book of Giants
- Literature relating to the apostle Thomas (who by tradition went to India, and was also venerated in Syria), such as portions of the Syriac The Acts of Thomas, and the Psalms of Thomas. The Gospel of Thomas was also attributed to Manichaeans by Cyril of Jerusalem, a fourth-century Church Father.[129]
- The legend of Barlaam and Josaphat passed from an Indian story about the Buddha, through a Manichaean version, before it transformed into the story of a Christian Saint in the west.
Later works
[edit]

In later centuries, as Manichaeism passed through eastern Persian-speaking lands and arrived at the Uyghur Khaganate (回鶻帝國), and eventually the Uyghur kingdom of Turpan (destroyed around 1335), Middle Persian and Parthian prayers (āfrīwan or āfurišn) and the Parthian hymn-cycles (the Huwīdagmān and Angad Rōšnan created by Mar Ammo) were added to the Manichaean writings.[130] A translation of a collection of these produced the Manichaean Chinese Hymnscroll (Chinese: 摩尼教下部讚; pinyin: Móní-jiào Xiàbù Zàn, which Lieu translates as "Hymns for the Lower Section [i.e. the Hearers] of the Manichaean Religion"[131]).
In addition to containing hymns attributed to Mani, it contains prayers attributed to Mani's earliest disciples, including Mār Zaku, Mār Ammo and Mār Sīsin. Another Chinese work is a complete translation of the Sermon of the Light Nous, presented as a discussion between Mani and his disciple Adda.[132]
Critical and polemic sources
[edit]Until discoveries in the 1900s of original sources, the only sources for Manichaeism were descriptions and quotations from non-Manichaean authors, either Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, or Zoroastrian ones. While often criticizing Manichaeism, they also quoted directly from Manichaean scriptures. This enabled Isaac de Beausobre, writing in the 18th century, to create a comprehensive work on Manichaeism, relying solely on anti-Manichaean sources.[133][134] Thus quotations and descriptions in Greek and Arabic have long been known to scholars, as have the long quotations in Latin by Saint Augustine, and the extremely important quotation in Syriac by Theodore Bar Konai.[citation needed]
Patristic depictions of Mani and Manichaeism
[edit]Eusebius commented as follows:
The error of the Manichees, which commenced at this time.
— In the mean time, also, that madman Manes, (Mani is of Persian or Semitic origin) as he was called, well agreeing with his name, for his demoniacal heresy, armed himself by the perversion of his reason, and at the instruction of Satan, to the destruction of many. He was a barbarian in his life, both in speech and conduct, but in his nature as one possessed and insane. Accordingly, he attempted to form himself into a Christ, and then also proclaimed himself to be the very paraclete and the Holy Spirit, and with all this was greatly puffed up with his madness. Then, as if he were Christ, he selected twelve disciples, the partners of his new religion, and after patching together false and ungodly doctrines, collected from a thousand heresies long since extinct, he swept them off like a deadly poison, from Persia, upon this part of the world. Hence the impious name of the Manichaeans spreading among many, even to the present day. Such then was the occasion of this knowledge, as it was falsely called, that sprouted up in these times.[135]
Acta Archelai
[edit]An example of how inaccurate some of these accounts could be can be seen in the account of the origins of Manichaeism contained in the Acta Archelai. This was a Greek anti-Manichaean work written before 348, most well known in its Latin version, which was regarded as an accurate account of Manichaeism until refuted by Isaac de Beausobre in the 18th century:
In the time of the Apostles there lived a man named Scythianus, who is described as coming "from Scythia", and also as being "a Saracen by race" ("ex genere Saracenorum"). He settled in Egypt, where he became acquainted with "the wisdom of the Egyptians", and invented the religious system that was afterwards known as Manichaeism. Finally he emigrated to Palestine, and, when he died, his writings passed into the hands of his sole disciple, a certain Terebinthus. The latter betook himself to Babylonia, assumed the name of Budda, and endeavoured to propagate his master's teaching. But he, like Scythianus, gained only one disciple, who was an old woman. After a while he died, in consequence of a fall from the roof of a house, and the books that he had inherited from Scythianus became the property of the old woman, who, on her death, bequeathed them to a young man named Corbicius, who had been her slave. Corbicius thereupon changed his name to Manes, studied the writings of Scythianus, and began to teach the doctrines that they contained, with many additions of his own. He gained three disciples, named Thomas, Addas, and Hermas. About this time the son of the Persian king fell ill, and Manes undertook to cure him; the prince, however, died, whereupon Manes was thrown into prison. He succeeded in escaping, but eventually fell into the hands of the king, by whose order he was flayed, and his corpse was hung up at the city gate.
A. A. Bevan, who quoted this story, commented that it "has no claim to be considered historical".[136]
View of Judaism in the Acta Archelai
[edit]According to Hegemonius' portrayal of Mani, the evil demiurge who created the world was the Jewish Yahweh. Hegemonius reports that Mani said,
"It is the Prince of Darkness who spoke with Moses, the Jews and their priests. Thus the Christians, the Jews, and the Pagans are involved in the same error when they worship this God. For he leads them astray in the lusts he taught them." He goes on to state: "Now, he who spoke with Moses, the Jews, and the priests he says is the archont of Darkness, and the Christians, Jews, and pagans (ethnic) are one and the same, as they revere the same god. For in his aspirations he seduces them, as he is not the god of truth. And so therefore all those who put their hope in the god who spoke with Moses and the prophets have (this in store for themselves, namely) to be bound with him, because they did not put their hope in the god of truth. For that one spoke with them (only) according to their own aspirations.[137]
Central Asian and Iranian primary sources
[edit]In the early 1900s, original Manichaean writings started to come to light when German scholars led by Albert Grünwedel, and then by Albert von Le Coq, began excavating at Gaochang, the ancient site of the Manichaean Uyghur Kingdom near Turpan, in Chinese Turkestan (destroyed around 1300 CE). While most of the writings they uncovered were in very poor condition, there were still hundreds of pages of Manichaean scriptures, written in three Iranian languages (Middle Persian, Parthian, and Sogdian) and old Uyghur. These writings were taken back to Germany and were analyzed and published at the Prussian Academy of Sciences in Berlin, by Le Coq and others, such as Friedrich W. K. Müller and Walter Bruno Henning. While the vast majority of these writings were written in a version of the Syriac script known as Manichaean script, the German researchers, perhaps for lack of suitable fonts, published most of them using the Hebrew alphabet (which could easily be substituted for the 22 Syriac letters).[citation needed]
Perhaps the most comprehensive of these publications was Manichaeische Dogmatik aus chinesischen und iranischen Texten (Manichaean Dogma from Chinese and Iranian texts), by Ernst Waldschmidt and Wolfgang Lentz, published in Berlin in 1933.[138] More than any other research work published before or since, this work printed, and then discussed, the original key Manichaean texts in the original scripts, and consists chiefly of sections from Chinese texts, and Middle Persian and Parthian texts transcribed with the Hebrew alphabet. After the Nazi Party gained power in Germany, the Manichaean writings continued to be published during the 1930s, but the publishers no longer used Hebrew letters, instead transliterating the texts into Latin letters.[citation needed]
Coptic primary sources
[edit]Additionally, in 1930, German researchers in Egypt found a large body of Manichaean works in Coptic. Though these were also damaged, hundreds of complete pages survived and, beginning in 1933, were analyzed and published in Berlin before World War II, by German scholars such as Hans Jakob Polotsky.[139] Some of these Coptic Manichaean writings were lost during the war.[140]
Chinese primary sources
[edit]After the success of the German researchers, French scholars visited China and discovered what is perhaps the most complete set of Manichaean writings, written in Chinese. These three Chinese writings, all found at the Mogao Caves among the Dunhuang manuscripts, and all written before the 9th century, are today kept in London, Paris, and Beijing. Some of the scholars involved with their initial discovery and publication were Édouard Chavannes, Paul Pelliot, and Aurel Stein. The original studies and analyses of these writings, along with their translations, first appeared in French, English, and German, before and after World War II. The complete Chinese texts themselves were first published in Tokyo, Japan in 1927, in the Taishō Tripiṭaka, volume 54. While in the last thirty years or so they have been republished in both Germany (with a complete translation into German, alongside the 1927 Japanese edition),[141] and China, the Japanese publication remains the standard reference for the Chinese texts.[citation needed]
Greek life of Mani, Cologne codex
[edit]In Egypt, a small codex was found and became known through antique dealers in Cairo. It was purchased by the University of Cologne in 1969. Two of its scientists, Henrichs and Koenen, produced the first edition known since as the Cologne Mani-Codex, which was published in four articles in the Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik. The ancient papyrus manuscript contained a Greek text describing the life of Mani. Thanks to this discovery, much more is known about the man who founded one of the most influential world religions of the past.[142]
Figurative use
[edit]The terms "Manichaean" and "Manichaeism" are sometimes used figuratively as a synonym of the more general term "dualist" with respect to a philosophy, outlook, or world-view.[143] The terms are often used to suggest that the worldview in question simplistically reduces historical events to a struggle between good and evil. For example, Zbigniew Brzezinski used the phrase "Manichaean paranoia" in reference to U.S. president George W. Bush's worldview (in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, 14 March 2007); Brzezinski elaborated that he meant "the notion that he [Bush] is leading the forces of good against the 'Axis of evil.'" Author and journalist Glenn Greenwald followed up on the theme in describing Bush in his book A Tragic Legacy (2007).
The term is frequently used by critics to describe the attitudes and foreign policies of the United States and its leaders.[144][145][146]
Philosopher Frantz Fanon frequently invoked the concept of Manicheanism in his discussions of violence between colonizers and the colonized.[147]
In My Secret History, author Paul Theroux's protagonist defines the word Manichaean for the protagonist's son as "seeing that good and evil are mingled." Before explaining the word to his son, the protagonist mentions Joseph Conrad's short story "The Secret Sharer" at least twice in the book, the plot of which also examines the idea of the duality of good and evil.[148]
See also
[edit]- Manichaean art
- Athinganoi, a purportedly related movement
- Abū Hilāl al-Dayhūri (8th century)
- Agapius (Manichaean) (4th or 5th century)
- Akouas
- Ancient Mesopotamian religion
- The Buddha in Manichaeism
- Chinese Manichaeism
- Good and evil
- Dualism in cosmology
- Hiwi al-Balkhi
- Indo-Iranian religion
- Jesus in Manichaeism
- Mar Ammo (3rd century)
- Mazdak
- Ming Cult
- Moral realism
- Abu Isa al-Warraq
- Yazdânism
- Yazidi
- Zurvanism
Notes
[edit]- ^ Also spelled Manichaism[4][5][6] /ˌmænɪˈkeɪɪzəm/ in accordance with the Koine Greek Μανιχαϊσμός[7] Manikhaïsmós and its regular Latinization Manichaismus.[8]
- ^ "According to the Fehrest, Mani was of Arsacid stock on both his father's and his mother's sides, at least if the readings al-ḥaskāniya (Mani's father) and al-asʿāniya (Mani's mother) are corrected to al-aškāniya and al-ašḡāniya (ed. Flügel, 1862, p. 49, ll. 2 and 3) respectively. The forefathers of Mani's father are said to have been from Hamadan and so perhaps of Iranian origin (ed. Flügel, 1862, p. 49, 5–6). The Chinese Compendium, which makes the father a local king, maintains that his mother was from the house Jinsajian, explained by Henning as the Armenian Arsacid family of Kamsarakan (Henning, 1943, p. 52, n. 4 1977, II, p. 115). Is that fact, or fiction, or both? The historicity of this tradition is assumed by most, but the possibility that Mani's noble Arsacid background is legendary cannot be ruled out (cf. Scheftelowitz, 1933, pp. 403–4). In any case, it is characteristic that Mani took pride in his origin from time-honored Babel, but never claimed affiliation to the Iranian upper class." – "Manichaeism" at Encyclopædia Iranica
- ^ These are apparently the 'twelve centuries clothed with flowers and full of melodies' (duodecim saecula floribus convestita et canoribus plena) at St Augustine, Contra Faustum 15.5[116]
References
[edit]- ^ a b Grenet, Frantz (2022). Splendeurs des oasis d'Ouzbékistan. Paris: Louvre Editions. p. 93. ISBN 978-84-125278-5-8.
- ^ "Believers, Proselytizers, & Translators The Sogdians". sogdians.si.edu. Archived from the original on 14 October 2023. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
- ^ GULÁCSI, ZSUZSANNA (2010). "The Prophet's Seal: A Contextualized Look at the Crystal Sealstone of Mani (A.D. 216–276) in the Bibliothèque nationale de France" (PDF). Bulletin of the Asia Institute. 24: 164. ISSN 0890-4464. JSTOR 43896125.
- ^ a b Hascard 1685, p. 13.
- ^ a b Dewar 1847, p. 67.
- ^ a b Gaster 1925, p. 87.
- ^ a b Sophocles 1900, p. 732.
- ^ a b Canz 1750, p. 299.
- ^ "manichaeism". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
- ^ Yarshater, Ehsan The Cambridge History of Iran, Volume 3 (2), The Seleucid, Parthian and Sasanian Periods, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983.
- ^ "Manichaeism". New Advent Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 8 May 2020. Retrieved 4 October 2013.
- ^ "Manichaeism" at Encyclopædia Iranica
- ^ a b c Turner, Alice K. (1993). The History of Hell (1st ed.). United States: Harcourt Brace. p. 50. ISBN 978-0-15-140934-1.
- ^ Corrigan, Kevin; Rasimus, Tuomas (2013). Gnosticism, Platonism and the late ancient world: essays in honour of John D. Turner. Nag Hammadi and Manichaean studies. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-22383-7.
- ^ Dardagan, Amer (13 May 2017). "Neoplatonism, The Response on Gnostic and Manichean ctiticism of Platonism". doi:10.31235/osf.io/krj2n.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - ^ Widengren, Geo Mesopotamian elements in Manichaeism (King and Saviour II): Studies in Manichaean, Mandaean, and Syrian-gnostic religion, Lundequistska bokhandeln, 1946.
- ^ Hopkins, Keith (July 2001). A World Full of Gods: The Strange Triumph of Christianity. New York: Plume. pp. 246, 263, 270. ISBN 0-452-28261-6. OCLC 47286228.
- ^ a b Arendzen, John (1 October 1910). "Manichæism Archived 1 December 2023 at the Wayback Machine". The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 9. New York: The Encyclopedia Press, Inc.
- ^ Jason BeDuhn; Paul Allan Mirecki (2007). Frontiers of Faith: The Christian Encounter With Manichaeism in the Acts of Archelaus. BRILL. p. 6. ISBN 978-90-04-16180-1.
- ^ Andrew Welburn, Mani, the Angel and the Column of Glory: An Anthology of Manichaean Texts (Edinburgh: Floris Books, 1998), p. 68
- ^ R. van den Broek, Wouter J. Hanegraaff Gnosis and Hermeticism from Antiquity to Modern Times. SUNY Press, 1998 ISBN 978-0-7914-3611-0 p. 37
- ^ Clarence, Siut Wai Hung. "The Forgotten Buddha: Manichaeism and Buddhist Elements in Imperial China". Archived from the original on 29 January 2024. Retrieved 29 January 2024.
- ^ Gardner, Iain; Lieu, Samuel N. C., eds. (2004). Manichaean Texts from the Roman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- ^ "Definition of MANICHAEAN". merriam-webster.com. 15 July 2023. Archived from the original on 4 January 2017. Retrieved 12 March 2018.
- ^ Mary Boyce, Zoroastrians: their religious beliefs and practices, Routledge, 2001. p. 111: "He was Iranian, of noble Parthian blood ..."
- ^ Warwick Ball, Rome in the East: the transformation of an empire, Routledge, 2001. p. 437: "Manichaeism was a syncretic religion, proclaimed by the Iranian Prophet Mani ...
- ^ a b L. Koenen and C. Römer, eds., Der Kölner Mani-Kodex. Über das Werden seines Leibes. Kritische Edition, (Abhandlung der Reinisch-Westfälischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Papyrologica Coloniensia 14) (Opladen, Germany) 1988.
- ^ Sundermann, Werner (20 July 2009). "MANI". Encyclopædia Iranica. Encyclopædia Iranica Foundation. Archived from the original on 14 October 2023. Retrieved 2 March 2023.
- ^ a b c Middle Persian Sources: D. N. MacKenzie, Mani's Šābuhragān, pt. 1 (text and translation), BSOAS 42/3, 1979, pp. 500–34, pt. 2 (glossary and plates), BSOAS 43/2, 1980, pp. 288–310.
- ^ Welburn (1998), pp. 67–68
- ^ Tardieu, Michel (2008). Manichaeism. University of Illinois Press. ISBN 978-0-252-03278-3.
- ^ Joosten, Jan (1996). The Syriac Language of the Peshitta and Old Syriac Versions of Matthew: Syntactic Structure, Inner-Syriac Developments and Translation Technique. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-10036-7.
- ^ a b Harari, Yuval Noah (2015). Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. Translated by Harari, Yuval Noah; Purcell, John; Watzman, Haim. London: Penguin Random House UK. p. 247. ISBN 978-0-09-959008-8. OCLC 910498369.
- ^ Reeves, John C. (1996). Heralds of That Good Realm: Syro-Mesopotamian Gnosis and Jewish Traditions. BRILL. pp. 6–. ISBN 978-90-04-10459-4. Retrieved 27 August 2012.
- ^ "Jainism – Posadha". Buddhism and Jainism. Encyclopedia of Indian Religions. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. 2017. p. 585. doi:10.1007/978-94-024-0852-2_100387. ISBN 978-94-024-0851-5.
- ^ Fynes, Richard C.C. (1996). "Plant Souls in Jainism and Manichaeism The Case for Cultural Transmission". East and West. 46 (1/2). Istituto Italiano per l'Africa e l'Oriente (IsIAO): 21–44. ISSN 0012-8376. JSTOR 29757253. Archived from the original on 30 May 2024. Retrieved 30 May 2024.
- ^ Coyle, John Kevin (2009). Manichaeism and Its Legacy. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. p. 7. ISBN 978-90-04-17574-7. Retrieved 27 August 2012.
- ^ a b "Manichaeism". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 8 May 2020. Retrieved 21 February 2023.
- ^ van Oort, Johannes (2020). "The Paraclete Mani as the Apostle of Jesus Christ and the Origins of a New Church". Mani and Augustine. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
- ^ a b Samuel N. C. Lieu (1992). Manichaeism in the Later Roman Empire and Medieval China. J.C.B. Mohr. pp. 161–. ISBN 978-3-16-145820-0. OCLC 1100183055. Archived from the original on 28 April 2023. Retrieved 28 April 2023.
- ^ Saint Augustine (2006). Boniface Ramsey (ed.). The Manichean Debate, Volume 1; Volume 19. New City Press. pp. 315–. ISBN 978-1-56548-247-0. OCLC 552327717. Archived from the original on 13 May 2023. Retrieved 28 April 2023.
- ^ "Manichaeism" at Encyclopædia Iranica
- ^ Stroumsa, Guy G. (2015). The Making of the Abrahamic Religions in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 95.
- ^ C. Colpe, "Das Siegel der Propheten: historische Beziehungen zwischen Judentum, Judenchristentum, Heidentum und frühem Islam", Arbeiten zur neutestamentlichen Theologie und Zeitgeschichte, 3 (Berlin: Institut Kirche und Judentum, 1990), 227–243.
- ^ G. G. Stroumsa, The Making of the Abrahamic Religions in Late Antiquity, Oxford Studies in the Abrahamic Religions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 68.
- ^ "The Dead Sea Scrolls – 1Q Enoch, Book of Giants". The Dead Sea Scrolls – 1Q Enoch, Book of Giants. Archived from the original on 8 January 2020. Retrieved 7 October 2019.
- ^ J. T. Milik, ed. and trans., The Books of Enoch: Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.
- ^ a b In: Henning, W. B., The Book of Giants, BSOAS, Vol. XI, Part 1, 1943, pp. 52–74.
- ^ Reeves, John C. Jewish Lore in Manichaean Cosmogony: Studies in the Book of Giants Traditions (1992)
- ^ See Henning, A Sogdian Fragment of the Manichaean Cosmogony, BSOAS, 1948
- ^ a b c d Original Syriac in: Theodorus bar Konai, Liber Scholiorum, II, ed. A. Scher, Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium scrip. syri, 1912, pp. 311–8, ISBN 978-90-429-0104-9; English translation in: A.V.W. Jackson, Researches in Manichaeism, New York, 1932, pp. 222–54.
- ^ Ephraim, Saint; Press, Aeterna. Of Mani, Marcion, and Bardaisan. Aeterna Press.
- ^ Richard Foltz, Religions of the Silk Road, Palgrave Macmillan, 2nd edition, 2010, p. 71 ISBN 978-0-230-62125-1
- ^ Peter Bryder, The Chinese Transformation of Manichaeism: A Study of Chinese Manichaean Terminology, 1985.
- ^ Lieu, Samuel N. C. (1998). Manichaeism in Central Asia and China. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-10405-1.
- ^ Lieu, Samuel N. C. (1985). Manichaeism in the Later Roman Empire and Medieval China: A Historical Survey. Manchester University Press. ISBN 978-0-7190-1088-0.
- ^ Iain Gardner and Samuel N. C. Lieu, eds., Manichaean Texts from the Roman Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 117–18.
- ^ Lieu, Samuel (1992) Manichaeism in the Later Roman Empire and Medieval China 2d edition, pp. 145–148
- ^ a b c d Doniger, Wendy (1999). Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions. Merriam-Webster. pp. 689, 690. ISBN 978-90-6831-002-3.
- ^ "St. Augustine of Hippo". Catholic.org. Catholic Online. Archived from the original on 25 September 2007. Retrieved 18 August 2012.
- ^ Confessions, Book V, Section 10.
- ^ A. Adam, Das Fortwirken des Manichäismus bei Augustin. In: ZKG (69) 1958, S. 1–25.
- ^ 从信仰摩尼教看漠北回纥[permanent dead link]
- ^ "关于回鹘摩尼教史的几个问题". Archived from the original on 7 August 2007.
- ^ "九姓回鹘爱登里罗汨没蜜施合毗伽可汗圣文神武碑". Bbs.sjtu.edu.cn. Archived from the original on 24 December 2013. Retrieved 14 February 2014.
- ^ TM276 Uygurca_Alttuerkisch_Qedimi Uygurche/TT 2.pdf Türkische Turfan-Texte. ~[permanent dead link]
- ^ "Древности Алтая".
- ^ Perkins, Dorothy (2013). Encyclopedia of China: History and Culture. Routledge. p. 309. ISBN 978-1-135-93562-7.
- ^ a b c d Samuel N. C. Lieu (1998). Manachaeism in Central Asia and China. Brill Publishers. pp. 115, 129, 130. ISBN 978-90-04-10405-1.
- ^ Patricia Ebrey, Anne Walthall (2013). Pre-Modern East Asia: A Cultural, Social, and Political History, Volume I: To 1800. Cengage. p. 228. ISBN 978-1-285-54623-0.
- ^ a b c Xisha Ma, Huiying Meng (2011). Popular Religion and Shamanism. Brill Publishers. pp. 56, 57, 99. ISBN 978-90-04-17455-9.
- ^ Patricia Ebrey, Anne Walthall (2013). Pre-Modern East Asia: A Cultural, Social, and Political History, Volume I: To 1800. Cengage. p. 228. ISBN 978-1-285-54623-0.
- ^ Étienne de la Vaissière, "Mani en Chine au VIe siècle", Journal asiatique, 293–1 (2005): 357–378.
- ^ a b c Hajianfard, Ramin (2016). Boku Tekin and the Uyghur Conversion to Manichaeism (763). Santa Barbara: CA, ABC-CLIO. pp. 409, 411. ISBN 978-1-61069-566-4. ISBN 978-1-61069-566-4.
- ^ Schaeffer, Kurtis; Kapstein, Matthew; Tuttle, Gray (2013). Sources of Tibetan Tradition. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 95, 96. ISBN 978-0-231-13599-3.
- ^ a b Rippin, Andrew (2013). The Islamic World. Routledge. p. 73. ISBN 978-1-136-80343-7.
- ^ a b c Hutter, Manfred (1993). "Manichaeism in the Early Sasanian Empire". Numen. 40 (1): 2–15. doi:10.2307/3270395. ISSN 0029-5973. JSTOR 3270395.
- ^ Berkey, Jonathan Porter (2003). The Formation of Islam: Religion and Society in the Near East. Cambridge University Press. pp. 99, 100. ISBN 978-0-521-58813-3.
- ^ Lewis, Bernard (2009). The Middle East. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-1-4391-9000-5.
- ^ Lambton, Ann K. S. (2013). State and Government in Medieval Islam. Routledge. pp. 50, 51. ISBN 978-1-136-60521-5.
- ^ "MANICHEISM v. MISSIONARY ACTIVITY AND TECHNIQUE: Manicheism in Arabia". Archived from the original on 16 November 2019. Retrieved 26 September 2019.
- ^ tavakoli, mohammadhadi. "Investigating the possibility of Manichaean presence in Hejaz during the pre-Islamic" (PDF). Studies of Religions and Denominations.
- ^ tavakoli, mohammadhadi. "A Semantic Study of Common Zandaqa in Quraysh in Pre-Islamic Era". History of Philosophy.
- ^ Zaman, Muhammad Qasim (1997), Religion and Politics Under the Early 'Abbasids: The Emergence of the Proto-Sunni Elite, Brill, pp. 63–65, ISBN 978-90-04-10678-9
- ^ Ibrahim, Mahmood (1994). "Religious inquisition as social policy: the persecution of the 'Zanadiqa' in the early Abbasid Caliphate". Arab Studies Quarterly. Archived from the original on 11 July 2012.
- ^ a b c Ames, Christine Caldwell (2015). Medieval Heresies. Cambridge University Press. p. 88. ISBN 978-1-107-02336-9.
- ^ Irfan Shahîd, Byzantium and the Arabs in the fourth century, 1984, p. 425.
- ^ a b Duchesne-Guillemin, Jacques; Lecoq, Pierre (1985). Papers in Honor of Professor Mary Boyce. Brill Publishers. p. 658. ISBN 978-90-6831-002-3.
- ^ Klimkeit, Hans-Joachim (1993). Gnosis on the Silk Road: Gnostic texts from Central Asia (1st ed.). San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco. ISBN 0-06-064586-5. OCLC 28067600.
- ^ Scott, David (2007). "Manichaeism in Bactria: Political Patterns & East-West Paradigms". Journal of Asian History. 41 (2): 107–130. ISSN 0021-910X. JSTOR 41933456.
- ^ Carrasco, David; Warmind, Morten; Hawley, John Stratton; Reynolds, Frank; Giarardot, Norman; Neusner, Jacob; Pelikan, Jaroslav; Campo, Juan; Penner, Hans (1999). Wendy Doniger (ed.). Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions. United States: Merriam-Webster. p. 689. ISBN 978-0-87779-044-0.
- ^ Hopkins, Keith (July 2001). A World Full of Gods: The Strange Triumph of Christianity. New York: Plume. p. 245. ISBN 0-452-28261-6. OCLC 47286228.
- ^ Coyle, J.K. (2009). Manichaeism and its Legacy. Brill. p. 19.
- ^ Melton, J. Gordon (2014). Faiths Across Time: 5000 years of Religious History. ABC-CLIO. p. 361. ISBN 978-1-61069-026-3.
- ^ Rong, Xinjian (24 October 2022). "Gaochang in the Second Half of the 5th Century and Its Relations with the Rouran Qaghanate and the Kingdoms of the Western Regions". The Silk Road and Cultural Exchanges between East and West. Brill. pp. 577–578. doi:10.1163/9789004512597_006. ISBN 978-90-04-51259-7.
- ^ Liu, Xinru (1997). Silk and Religion: An Exploration of Material Life and the Thought of People, AD 600–1200, Parts 600–1200. Oxford University Press. p. 182. ISBN 978-0-19-564452-4.
- ^ Lieu, Samuel N. C. (1985). Manichaeism in the Later Roman Empire and Medieval China: A Historical Survey. Manchester University Press. p. 261. ISBN 978-0-7190-1088-0.
- ^ ter Haar, B. J. (1999). The White Lotus Teachings in Chinese Religious History. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-2218-7.
- ^ Doniger, Wendy (1999). Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions. Merriam-Webster. p. 690. ISBN 978-90-6831-002-3.
- ^ Stroumsa, Gedaliahu G., "Anti-Cathar Polemics and the Liber de duobus principiis", in B. Lewis and F. Niewöhner, eds., Religionsgespräche im Mittelalter (Wolfenbütteler Mittelalter-Studien, 4; Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1992), 169–183, p. 170
- ^ Fortescue, Adrian (1 February 1911). "Paulicians Archived 8 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine". The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 9. New York: The Encyclopedia Press, Inc.
- ^ a b c Runciman, Steven, The Medieval Manichee: a study of the Christian dualist heresy. Cambridge University Press, 1947.
- ^ Dondaine, Antoine. O. P. Un traite neo-manicheen du XIIIe siecle: Le Liber de duobus principiis, suivi d'un fragment de rituel Cathare (Rome: Institutum Historicum Fratrum Praedicatorum, 1939)
- ^ Weber, Nicholas (1 March 1907). "Albigenses Archived 25 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine". The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 1. New York: The Encyclopedia Press, Inc.
- ^ 明教在温州的最后遗存 – 温州社会研究所 [The Last Remains of Mingjiao in Wenzhou – Wenzhou Institute of Social Research] (in Chinese). 25 August 2013. Archived from the original on 25 August 2013.
- ^ 崇寿宫记. Cxsz.cixi.gov.cn. 8 October 2012. Archived from the original on 13 May 2013. Retrieved 14 February 2014.
- ^ "Manichaean and (Nestorian) Christian Remains in Zayton (Quanzhou, South China) ARC DP0557098". Mq.edu.au. Archived from the original on 8 August 2014. Retrieved 27 August 2014.
- ^ Wang, Yanbin (1 February 2024). "Cao'an in the Ancestral World: Contemporary Manichaeism-Related Belief and Familial Ethics in Southeastern China". Religions. 15 (2). MDPI: 185–213. doi:10.3390/rel15020185.
- ^ Hajianfard, Ramin (2016). Mani and the Foundation of Manichaeism: Great Events in Religion: An Encyclopedia of Pivotal Events in Religion History. Santa Barbara: CA, ABC-CLIO. p. 193. ISBN 978-1-61069-566-4. ISBN 978-1-61069-566-4.
- ^ Özertural, Zekine; Şilfeler, Gökhan (2024). Der östliche Manichäismus im Spiegel seiner Buch- und Schriftkultur - Gesamter Band. Göttingen Academy of Sciences. doi:10.26015/adwdocs-4686. ISBN 978-3-11-059145-3.
- ^ a b Bevan, A. A. (1930). "Manichaeism". Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, Volume VIII Ed. James Hastings. London
- ^ Jonas, Hans The Gnostic Religion, 1958, Ch. 9: Creation, World History, Salvation According to Mani.
- ^ a b Doresse, Jean (1986). The Secret Books of the Egyptian Gnostics. New York: MJF Books. p. 269. ISBN 978-1-56731-227-0.
- ^ a b c d e f g Ma & Wang (2018).
- ^ Chart from: E. Waldschmidt and W. Lenz, Die Stellung Jesu im Manichäismus, Berlin, 1926, p 42.
- ^ Augustine, Contra Faustum 15.5
- ^ "Augustine and Manichaeism". www-personal.umich.edu. Archived from the original on 28 May 2020. Retrieved 5 April 2020.
- ^ G. Haloun and W. B. Henning, The Compendium of the Doctrines and Styles of the Teaching of Mani, the Buddha of Light, Asia Major, 1952, pp. 184–212, p. 195.
- ^ J. van (Johannes) Oort, Jacob Albert van den Berg In Search of Truth. Augustine, Manichaeism and Other Gnosticism: Studies for Johannes Van Oort at Sixty BRILL, 2011 ISBN 978-90-04-18997-3 p. 258
- ^ Jason BeDuhn New Light on Manichaeism: Papers from the Sixth International Congress on Manichaeism, Organized by the International Association of Manichaean Studies BRILL, 2009 ISBN 978-90-04-17285-2 p. 77
- ^ a b Johannes van Oort Augustine and Manichaean Christianity: Selected Papers from the First South African Conference on Augustine of Hippo, University of Pretoria, 24–26 April 2012 BRILL, 01.08.2013 ISBN 978-90-04-25506-7 p. 74
- ^ Charles George Herbermann The Catholic Encyclopedia: An International Work of Reference on the Constitution, Doctrine, Discipline, and History of the Catholic Church, Band 9 Universal Knowledge Foundation, 1913 Digit. 16. Aug. 2006 p. 594
- ^ New Light on Manichaeism: Papers from the Sixth International Congress o p. 78
- ^ a b c Johannes van Oort Augustine and Manichaean Christianity: Selected Papers from the First South African Conference on Augustine of Hippo, University of Pretoria, 24–26 April 2012 BRILL, 01.08.2013 ISBN 978-90-04-25506-7 p. 75
- ^ Augustine (1991), p. xxviii.
- ^ Sundermann, Werner (20 July 2009). "MANICHEISM i. GENERAL SURVEY". Encyclopædia Iranica. Encyclopædia Iranica Foundation. Retrieved 2 March 2023.
- ^ Lieu, Samuel (17 October 2011). "CHINESE TURKESTAN vii. Manicheism in Chinese Turkestan and China". Encyclopædia Iranica. Encyclopædia Iranica Foundation. Retrieved 2 March 2023.
- ^ W. B. Henning, Sogdica, 1940, p. 11.
- ^ "Let none read the gospel according to Thomas, for it is the work, not of one of the twelve apostles, but of one of Mani's three wicked disciples."—Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechesis V (4th century)
- ^ See, for example, Boyce, Mary (1954). The Manichaean hymn-cycles in Parthian. London Oriental Series. Vol. 3. London: Oxford University Press.
- ^ Lieu 1998, p. 50.
- ^ "The Traité is, despite its title (Moni jiao cao jing, lit. "fragmentary [Mathews, no. 6689] Manichean scripture"), a long text in an excellent state of preservation, with only a few lines missing at the beginning. It was first fully published with a facsimile by Edouard Chavannes (q.v.) and Paul Pelliot in 1911 and is frequently known as Traité Pelliot. Their transcription (including typographical errors) was reproduced in the Chinese translation of the Buddhist Tripiṭaka (Taishō, no. 2141 B, LIV, pp. 1281a16-1286a29); that text was in turn reproduced with critical notes by Helwig Schmidt-Glintzer (1987b, pp. T. 81–86). A more accurate transcription was published by Chen Yuan in 1923 (pp. 531–44), and a new collation based on a reexamination of the original photographs of the manuscript has now been published by Lin Wu-shu (1987, pp. 217–29), with the photographs", "Chinese Turkestan vii. Manicheism in Chinese Turkestan and China" at Encyclopædia Iranica
- ^ de Beausobre, Isaac (1734). Histoire critique de Manichée et du manichéisme [Critical history of Manichae and Manichaeism] (in French). Vol. 1. Amsterdam: J. Frederic Bernard. Archived from the original on 6 December 2018. Retrieved 6 December 2018.
- ^ Beausobre, Isaac de; Formey, S. (1739). Histoire critique de Manichée et du manichéisme [Critical history of Manichae and Manichaeism] (in French). Vol. 2. Amsterdam: J. Frederic Bernard. Archived from the original on 6 December 2018. Retrieved 6 December 2018.
- ^ Eusebius. The Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius Pamphilus, Bishop of Caesarea, Translated from the originals by Christian Frederick Cruse.1939. Ch. XXXI.
- ^ Bevan, A. A. (1930). "Manichaeism". Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, Volume VIII. Ed. James Hastings. London.
- ^ "Classical Texts: Acta Archelai of Mani" (PDF). Iranian Studies at Harvard University. p. 76. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 3 December 2008.
- ^ Waldschmidt, E., and Lentz, W., Manichäische Dogmatik aus chinesischen und iranischen Texten (SPAW 1933, No. 13)
- ^ Hans Jakob Polotsky and Karl Schmidt, Ein Mani-Fund in Ägypten, Original-Schriften des Mani und seiner Schüler. Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften 1933.
- ^ Mirecki, Paul Allan; BeDuhn, Jason David (31 December 1996). Emerging from Darkness: Studies in the Recovery of Manichaean Sources. Brill. p. vii. ISBN 978-90-04-10760-1.
- ^ Schmidt-Glintzer, Helwig (1987). Chinesische Manichaeica [Chinese Manichaica] (in German). Wiesbaden.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Sundermann, Werner (26 October 2011). "COLOGNE MANI CODEX". Encyclopædia Iranica. Encyclopædia Iranica Foundation. Archived from the original on 2 March 2023. Retrieved 2 March 2023.
- ^ "Manichaean – definition of Manichaean in English". Manichaean. The Oxford Dictionaries. Archived from the original on 25 September 2011. Retrieved 31 July 2011.
- ^ Kennedy, Douglas (26 April 2017). "Ode to a Philistine: Howard Jacobson's Pussy". New Statesman. Archived from the original on 20 October 2017. Retrieved 1 May 2023.
- ^ Kaplan, Fred (21 October 2004). "Paul Nitze". Slate. Archived from the original on 16 October 2017. Retrieved 20 October 2017.
- ^ Bryant, Nick (10 July 2015). "The decline of US power?". BBC News. Archived from the original on 3 June 2018. Retrieved 21 July 2018.
- ^ Fieser, James; Dowden, Bradley (eds.). "Frantz Fanon". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Martin, TN: University of Tennessee at Martin. Archived from the original on 15 August 2016. Retrieved 25 September 2020.
- ^ Theroux, Paul (1989). My Secret History. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons. pp. 471, 473. ISBN 0-399-13424-7.
Works cited
[edit]- Augustine (1991). Confessions. Translated by Chadwick, Henry. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-281779-5.
- Beausobre, de, Isaac (1734–1739). Histoire critique de Manichée et du Manichéisme. Amsterdam: Garland Pub. ISBN 978-0-8240-3552-5.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - BeDuhn, Jason David (2002). The Manichaean Body: In Discipline and Ritual. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-7107-8.
- Canz, Israel Gottlieb (1750). Meditationes philosophicae.
- Dewar, Daniel (1847). The Holy Spirit: His Personality, Divinity, Office, and Agency, in the Regeneration and Sanctification of Man. London.
- Foltz, Richard (2010). Religions of the Silk Road. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-230-62125-1.
- Gardner, Iain; Lieu, Samuel N.C. (2004). Manichaean Texts from the Roman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-56822-7.
- Gaster, Moses (1925). The Samaritans: Their History, Doctrines and Literature (PDF). London: Oxford University Press.
- Hascard, Gregory (1685). A Discourse about the Charge of Novelty Upon the Reformed Church of England. London.
- La Vaissière, Etienne de, "Mani en Chine au VIe siècle", Journal Asiatique, 293–1, 2005, p. 357–378.
- Lieu, Samuel N.C. (1992). Manichaeism in the Later Roman Empire and Medieval China. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. ISBN 978-0-7190-1088-0.
- Ma, Xiaohe; Wang, Chuan (2018). "On the Xiapu Ritual Manual Mani the Buddha of Light". Religions. 9 (7): 212. doi:10.3390/rel9070212.
- Runciman, Steven (1982) [1947]. The Medieval Manichee: a study of the Christian dualist heresy. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-28926-9.
- Sophocles, Evangelinos Apostolides (1900). "μανιχαϊσμός". Greek Lexicon of the Roman and Byzantine Periods (from B. C. 146 to A. D. 1100). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
- Welburn, Andrew (1998). Mani, the Angel and the Column of Glory. Edinburgh: Floris. ISBN 978-0-86315-274-0.
- Widengren, Geo (1965). Mani and Manichaeism. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Further reading
[edit]- Baker-Brian, Nicholas J. (2011). Manichaeism: An Ancient Faith Rediscovered. London and New York. T&T Clark.
- Beatty, Alfred Chester (1938). Charles Allberry (ed.). A Manichean Psalm-Book, Part II. Stuttgart.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Cross, F. L.; E. A. Livingstone (1974). The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. London: Oxford UP: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-211545-4.
- Favre, Francois (5 May 2005). Mani, the Gift of Light. Renova symposium. Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
- Foltz, Richard (2013). Religions of Iran: From Prehistory to the Present. London: Oneworld publications. ISBN 978-1-78074-308-0.
- Gardner, Iain (2020). The Founder of Manichaeism. Rethinking the Lives of Mani. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Giversen, Soren (1988). The Manichaean Coptic Papyri in The Chester Beatty Library Vol. III: Psalm Book part I. (Facsimile ed.). Geneva: Patrick Crammer. (Cahiers D'Orientalism XVI) 1988a
- Giversen, Soren (1988). The Manichaean Coptic Papyri in The Chester Beatty Library Vol. IV: Psalm Book part II (Facsimile ed.). Geneva: Patrick Crammer. (Cahiers D'Orientalism XVI) 1988b.
- Grousset, Rene (1939), tr. Walford, Naomi (1970), The Empire of the Steppes: A History of Central Asia, New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers.ISBN 978-0-8135-1304-1.
- Gulácsi, Zsuzsanna (2001). Manichaean art in Berlin Collections. Turnhout.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) (Original Manichaean manuscripts found since 1902 in China, Egypt, Turkestan to be seen in the Museum of Indian Art in Berlin.) - Heinrichs, Albert; Ludwig Koenen, Ein griechischer Mani-Kodex, 1970 (ed.) Der Kölner Mani-Codex ( P. Colon. Inv. nr. 4780), 1975–1982.
- Ibscher, Hugo (1938). Allberry Charles R. C. (ed.). Manichaean Manuscripts in the Chester Beatty Collection: Vol II, part II: A Manichaean Psalm Book. Stuttgart: W. Kohlammer.
- Legge, Francis (1964) [1914]. Forerunners and Rivals of Christianity, From 330 B.C. to 330 A.D.. New York: University Books. LC Catalog 64-24125. reprinted in two volumes bound as one
- Mani (216–276/7) and his 'biography': the Codex Manichaicus Coloniensis (CMC):
- Melchert, Norman (2002). The Great Conversation: A Historical Introduction to Philosophy. McGraw Hill. ISBN 978-0-19-517510-3.
- Skjaervo, Prods Oktor (2006). An Introduction to Manicheism.
- Towers, Susanna (2019). Constructions of Gender in Late Antique Manichaean Cosmological Narrative. Brepols. Turnhout.
- Wurst, Gregor (July 2001). "Die Bema-Psalmen". Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 60 (3): 203–204. doi:10.1086/468925.
External links
[edit]Outside articles
[edit]- Catholic Encyclopedia – Manichæism Archived 8 May 2020 at the Wayback Machine public domain, published 1917.
- International Association of Manichaean Studies Archived 15 August 2004 at the Wayback Machine
- Manichaean and Christian Remains in Zayton (Quanzhou, South China) Archived 19 July 2008 at the Wayback Machine
- Religions of Iran: Manichaeism Archived 18 December 2007 at the Wayback Machine by I.J.S. Taraporewala
- 专题研究–摩尼教研究 Archived 4 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine
- 《光明皇帝》明尊教背景书(1) Archived 5 January 2020 at the Wayback Machine
Manichaean sources in English translation
[edit]- A summary of the Manichaean creation myth Archived 2 November 2005 at the Wayback Machine
- Manichaean Writings Archived 8 July 2005 at the Wayback Machine
- Manicheism. Complete bibliography and selection of Manichaean source texts in PDF format:
- The Book of the Giants Archived 17 July 2019 at the Wayback Machine by W.B. Henning, 1943
- Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies Archived 16 November 2021 at the Wayback Machine (NHMS) series from Brill (various volumes containing English translations of Manichaean texts)
Secondary Manichaean sources in English translation
[edit]Manichaean sources in their original languages
[edit]- Photos of the Entire Koeln Mani-Kodex Archived 13 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine (Greek).
- The Syriac Manichaean work quoted by Theodor bar Khonai
- Photos of the Original Middle Persian Manichaean Writings/Fragments Discovered at Turpan (The index of this German site can be searched for additional Manichaean material, including photos of the original Chinese Manichaean writings)
- "Sermon of the Soul", in Parthian and Sogdian Archived 24 December 2013 at the Wayback Machine
- Middle Persian and Parthian Texts Archived 31 July 2007 at the Wayback Machine
- D. N. MacKenzie, Mani's Šābuhragān, pt. 1 (text and translation), BSOAS 42/3, 1979, pp. 500–34,[1] pt. 2 (glossary and plates), BSOAS 43/2, 1980, pp. 288–310 [2].
- Chinese Manichaean Scriptures: 摩尼教殘經一 Archived 14 December 2010 at the Wayback Machine ("Incomplete Sutra one of Manichaeism") & 摩尼光佛教法儀略 Archived 22 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine("The Mani Bright Buddha teaching plan") & 下部讚 Archived 22 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine("The Lower Part Praises")
Secondary Manichaean sources in their original languages
[edit]Manichaeism
View on GrokipediaFounder and Origins
Life and Ministry of Mani
Mani was born circa 216 CE in the village of Mardinu, located approximately 100 kilometers southwest of Ctesiphon, the capital of the Sasanian Empire, to parents of Parthian aristocratic descent.[6] His father adhered to the Elkesaites, an ascetic sect blending Jewish, Christian, and possibly Mandaean elements, emphasizing repeated baptisms and communal living; Mani spent his early years in their settlement on the Euphrates.[6] Manichaean texts recount that at age four, Mani experienced an initial apparition of his divine twin (syzygos), a celestial counterpart guiding his revelations, though he remained within the sect until age 24.[7] At age 24, around 240 CE, Mani received a divine mandate to renounce the Elkesaites' practices and initiate his prophetic mission, declaring himself the seal of prophets who synthesized and superseded prior revelations from Zoroaster, Buddha, and Jesus.[6] He commenced preaching in Mesopotamia, composing his first scriptures in Aramaic, including the canonical Psalms and Prayers featuring hymns and poetic works, and establishing a dualistic cosmology positing an eternal conflict between light and darkness, with human souls as trapped particles of light requiring liberation through ascetic knowledge.[8] Mani organized his followers into "elect" ascetics who abstained from meat, wine, and sex to facilitate particle release, and "hearers" lay supporters providing material aid; he dispatched apostles to propagate teachings eastward to Central Asia and westward toward the Roman Empire.[7] During the 240s-250s CE, Mani traveled to the Kushan Empire in India, absorbing Buddhist concepts like karma and monasticism while adapting his message to local audiences, as evidenced by surviving hymn fragments referencing Indic motifs and illustrating the syncretic influences in his poetic compositions.[6] Returning under the reign of Shapur I (r. 240-270 CE), he secured royal favor, dedicating his Middle Persian work Shabuhragan to the king and converting elites at Gundeshapur, which facilitated Manichaeism's institutional growth including temples and scriptoria.[7] By the 270s CE, his church spanned Persia, with missions reaching Egypt and Syria, though tensions arose with Zoroastrian magi over competing cosmologies.[9] Under Bahram I (r. 271-274 CE), pressured by orthodox Zoroastrian priests who viewed Manichaeism as a threat to imperial unity, Mani was summoned to the court in 276 CE, imprisoned in Gundeshapur, and subjected to torture including possible flaying; he died shortly thereafter, around February 277 CE, from the ordeal.[6][7] His followers preserved accounts of his final days in texts like the Arzhang, depicting his suffering as martyrdom akin to prior prophets, which fueled the religion's resilience despite ensuing persecutions.[9] Syncretic Influences and Formative Context
Mani, born around 216 CE in southern Mesopotamia during the early Sasanian Empire, was raised in a Jewish-Christian baptist sect known as the Elchasaites, centered near Seleucia-Ctesiphon, which emphasized repeated baptisms for purification and adhered to a mix of Mosaic law, encratite asceticism, and apocalyptic expectations.[10] This formative environment exposed him to syncretic Judeo-Christian practices blending Old Testament legalism with baptismal rites derived from earlier Mesopotamian religious currents, though Mani later rejected the sect's ritualistic excesses in favor of a more universalist framework following a divine revelation from his heavenly counterpart, the Syzygos, at age 24 or 60 (per varying accounts in Manichaean texts).[11] The Sasanian context, marked by Ardashir I's consolidation of power in 224 CE and initial religious pluralism under Shapur I (r. 240–270 CE), provided a fertile ground for Mani's ministry, as the empire's crossroads position facilitated exchanges between Persian, Hellenistic, and Eastern traditions amid Zoroastrian dominance.[12] Manichaeism's syncretism is evident in Mani's self-presentation as the culmination of prophetic revelations, explicitly positioning Zoroaster, the Buddha, and Jesus as predecessors who delivered partial truths adapted to their epochs, with his doctrine synthesizing their core elements into a cohesive dualistic system.[13] From Zoroastrianism, Mani adopted and intensified the light-dark dualism, transforming Ahura Mazda and Angra Mainyu into primal, uncreated principles of good and evil locked in eternal conflict, while incorporating fire worship and eschatological judgment motifs suited to the Sasanian milieu.[14] Christian influences, particularly Gnostic strains, appear in the emphasis on a suffering redeemer figure akin to the Gnostic Christ and docetic views of Jesus's non-physical crucifixion, drawn from Syriac-speaking communities in Mesopotamia; Mani's writings, such as the Shabuhragan composed in Middle Persian for Shapur I, integrate these with baptismal echoes from his Elchasaite youth, repurposed as symbolic release of light-particles from matter.[11] Buddhist elements entered via Mani's travels to India around 240–250 CE, where he encountered monastic structures, vegetarianism, and cosmological hierarchies of realms, adapting the wheel of rebirth into a Manichaean cycle of soul transmigration driven by light entrapment in darkness, and structuring his elect class with parallels to Buddhist arhats in ascetic discipline and mendicancy.[15] Hellenistic and Marcionite traces further shaped the theology, evident in the rationalized cosmogony and rejection of Old Testament creator-god as a flawed demiurge, reflecting a broader third-century intellectual synthesis in the empire's diverse religious landscape.[13] This eclectic formation, grounded in primary Manichaean texts like the Kephalaia and Epistle to Edessa, underscores Mani's intent to universalize truth beyond ethnic boundaries, leveraging the Sasanians' imperial expansion for dissemination while navigating Zoroastrian priestly opposition.[16]Theological Framework
Core Dualistic Principles
Manichaeism's foundational theology rests on a radical ontological dualism positing two co-eternal, unbegotten, and independent principles: the Kingdom of Light, embodying goodness, spirit, and immutability, and the Kingdom of Darkness, representing evil, matter, and insatiable aggression.[17] Mani explicitly described these as "uncreated and without beginning: Both the good, which is light; and the evil, which is darkness and matter," emphasizing their primordial separation and lack of subordination to any higher creator.[17] This dualism rejects monistic or emanationist cosmologies prevalent in contemporaneous religions, instead framing reality as an irreducible opposition where light's purity contrasts with darkness's inherent corruption.[18] The principle of Light originates from the Father of Greatness, a transcendent, luminous entity who generates divine emanations such as the Mother of Life and the Primal Man, all composed of unadulterated spiritual substance.[2] In opposition, the Darkness arises from a chaotic, self-subsistent realm ruled by demonic archons driven by base instincts like greed and destruction, with matter serving as its physical manifestation and vehicle for entrapment.[18] This asymmetry in quality—light as passive perfection versus darkness as active malevolence—underpins the religion's view of cosmic conflict, where the initial invasion of light by darkness results in a mingled universe but foreordains light's ultimate triumph through separation.[19] Unlike Zoroastrian dualism, which allows for eventual reconciliation, Manichaean principles maintain an absolute ethical divide, equating spirit with salvation and matter with perpetual bondage, thereby mandating ascetic practices to liberate entrapped light particles.[18] Human souls, as fragments of divine light, participate in this dualistic struggle, their divine essence corrupted by material embodiment yet redeemable through gnosis and ritual.[20] This framework influenced later thinkers like Augustine, who initially grappled with its implications before rejecting it, highlighting its appeal in explaining evil's persistence without impugning a singular benevolent deity.[18]Cosmogonic Myth and Cosmology
Manichaean cosmogony posits two co-eternal, uncreated realms: the World of Light—also termed the Kingdom of Light—the primordial spiritual domain embodying pure spirit and goodness in eternal opposition to the Kingdom of Darkness, characterized by matter and evil.[2] The Father of Greatness, the supreme deity of light and unengendered source of all divine emanations, perceives the encroaching threat from the King of Darkness and initiates countermeasures.[21] He evokes the Mother of Life, who in turn produces the Primal Man, armed with five sons representing the elements of light—often identified as air, wind, light, water, and fire—as the first act of creation to defend the realm of light.[2][21] In the mythic confrontation, the Primal Man engages the forces of darkness but is overwhelmed, resulting in the imprisonment of light particles within the bodies of dark demons.[2] The Father of Greatness responds with a second creation, evoking the Living Spirit, who, assisted by the Mother of Life and other divine figures like the Friend of the Lights and the Great Builder, defeats and flays the demons to construct the material cosmos as a temporary prison for the mingled light and darkness.[2][21] From the demons' skins emerge ten heavens and eight earths, forming a structured universe that facilitates the gradual separation and redemption of light.[22] The third phase involves the Third Messenger, who evokes twelve virgin maidens to stir lust among the demons, compelling them to ejaculate light particles and form the archetypal Adam (Adamas), while further emissions create the human progenitors Adam and Eve, trapping additional souls in corporeal forms.[2] This myth, preserved in primary texts such as Mani's Šābuhragān, the Coptic Kephalaia, and the Latin Epistula Fundamenti, underscores the cosmos as a battlefield for liberating divine light from material contamination.[2] Manichaean cosmology elaborates a hierarchical universe with three primary mechanisms for light extraction: the wheels of wind, sun, and moon, which act as arks to collect and purify light particles ascending via the Column of Glory, a luminous pillar connecting earth to the heavens.[22] The structure comprises multiple spheres and firmaments, including eleven or twelve heavens, with the ultimate eschatological separation restoring pure light to its divine origin and consigning darkness to an eternal abyss.[2][22] This framework, derived from Manichaean scriptural fragments and doctrinal diagrams, portrays the present world as a transient mixture engineered for the salvation of light through divine and human agency.[2]Ethical Implications and Human Role
In Manichaean cosmology, humans serve as the primary agents in the ongoing separation of light from darkness, embodying a microcosmic mixture of divine light particles entrapped within material darkness. The soul, consisting of these light elements, is imprisoned in the body—a construct formed by demonic forces to perpetuate captivity—rendering ethical conduct a direct extension of cosmic redemption. Adherents are called to liberate light through deliberate actions that prevent further contamination or destruction of luminous substances, with salvation hinging on gnosis that reveals this entrapment and prescribes purification.[2][23] The Elect fulfill this role through extreme asceticism, abstaining from procreation, meat, wine, and possessions to avoid ensnaring additional light in new bodies or annihilating it in living organisms. These prohibitions arise from the principle that reproduction and consumption of animal products—believed to contain assimilated light—hinder the soul's ascent, while practices like fasting and ritual meals facilitate light's extraction via digestion and expulsion. Hearers, less rigorously bound, engage in worldly labor to provision the Elect, accruing merit for potential reincarnation as Elect and contributing indirectly to the collective release of light particles.[24][23][25] Ethically, Manichaeism posits non-violence and detachment as virtues aligned with light's purity, contrasting with darkness's impulses toward lust and aggression; violations lead to karmic cycles of rebirth, delaying universal salvation until all light returns to its origin via mechanisms like the Column of Glory. This framework underscores humanity's indispensable function: without ethical vigilance, the cosmic prison persists, but through disciplined separation, adherents hasten the final triumph of light over matter.[2][25]Religious Practices and Community Structure
Distinction Between Elect and Hearers
In Manichaeism, the community was divided into two primary classes: the Elect (also known as the Perfect or electi), who adhered to stringent ascetic disciplines, and the Hearers (auditores), lay supporters who followed milder precepts while providing material sustenance to the Elect.[26][27] This binary structure facilitated the religion's dualistic cosmology, wherein the Elect actively participated in liberating divine light particles trapped in matter through ritual consumption of pure foods, while Hearers enabled this process by supplying elect-approved produce without directly engaging in it.[28][26] The Elect, forming the clerical elite, were bound by the three seals: the seal of the mouth (abstaining from meat, wine, and impure speech), the seal of the hands (refraining from harming living beings or possessing property), and the seal of the breast (maintaining celibacy).[28] They renounced marriage, worldly possessions, and manual labor, relying on Hearers for food—typically fruits and vegetables believed to contain concentrated light—and alms, in exchange for interceding on the Hearers' behalf for salvation.[26][27] Hierarchical roles among the Elect included 12 apostles (modeled after Mani's original disciples), bishops, presbyters, and deacons, with women also serving as Elect in parallel structures.[26] Entry into the Elect required rigorous initiation, often after years as a Hearer, and was irreversible; failure to uphold the vows could result in demotion or damnation in Manichaean eschatology.[27] Hearers, comprising the majority of adherents, observed looser guidelines, such as seven or ten commandments prohibiting idolatry, lying, and fornication, but permitting marriage, occasional meat consumption (avoiding Baphomet-tainted animals), and commerce, provided they minimized harm to life.[26][28] Their primary duty was logistical support for the Elect, including procuring and offering "elect's bread" during communal meals called madoka, where the Elect's digestion ritually freed light particles for ascent to the divine realm.[28] In return, Hearers received teachings, participated in worship, and anticipated reincarnation as Elect in future lives, accruing merit through obedience and almsgiving; Augustine of Hippo, a Hearer for nine years before his conversion circa 386 CE, exemplified this class, avoiding the Elect's demands due to their perceived impracticality.[27][29] This symbiotic arrangement underscored Manichaeism's pragmatic adaptation for propagation: the Elect's itinerant preaching and ritual purity drew converts, while the Hearers' integration into society sustained communities amid persecutions, as evidenced in 4th-century Roman Empire documents and Central Asian fragments.[26][27] Daily observances reinforced the divide, with Elect performing seven prayers oriented toward sun and moon, and Hearers four, emphasizing cosmic alignment over personal agency.[28]Liturgical Rituals and Daily Observances
Manichaean liturgical rituals centered on the distinction between the ascetic Elect and the lay Hearers, with the former engaging in more rigorous daily and periodic observances to facilitate the release of divine light particles trapped in matter. The Elect performed seven daily prayers at fixed hours, while Hearers recited four, often facing the sun during the day and the moon at night to honor celestial bodies as vessels of light. These prayers, drawn from canonical texts like the Treasury of Life, involved invocations, the recitation and singing of hymns and psalms, poetic invocations, and prostrations, punctuating the day with structured moments of worship akin to monastic canonical hours. Manichaean liturgy prominently featured a rich tradition of poetry and hymnody, with hymns, psalms, and poetic texts composed in languages such as Parthian, Middle Persian, and Coptic forming an integral part of daily prayers, confessions, communal worship, and major festivals including the Bēma. Many of these compositions are attributed to Mani himself or his immediate disciples, serving to convey dualistic teachings, express devotion to divine redeemers and the Living Soul, exalt Mani, invoke divine light, and aid in its spiritual liberation from matter; notable examples include Parthian hymn-cycles praising figures such as the Third Messenger, Jesus the Splendor, or the Living Soul, and Coptic psalms such as the Psalms of Heracleides and the Psalms of Thomas.[30][31][8] Daily meals for the Elect constituted a central ritual act of salvation, where food alms provided by Hearers—strictly vegetarian and excluding meat, wine, or animal products—were consumed as a symbolic "distillation" process to extract and elevate light from material substances. This communal feeding, accompanied by blessings and scriptural readings, underscored the interdependent roles of Elect and Hearers, with the former's digestive act serving as an "altar" for cosmic redemption. Weekly assemblies included confession rituals, where participants enumerated sins before the community, reinforcing ethical discipline and group cohesion between daily prayers and the sacred meal.[32] Periodic observances encompassed monthly fasts beginning on the eighth day of the lunar month and extending until sunset, emphasizing abstinence to purify the body and align with light's triumph over darkness. The preeminent liturgical event was the annual Bēma festival, commemorating Mani's death and apotheosis around 277 CE, typically observed on the last day of a fasting month—often aligning with the vernal equinox in the Babylonian calendar on the 7th of Addar—with rituals spanning a preparatory month of psalmody, vigils, communal readings, and intensified fasting culminating in a vigil featuring an empty chair or symbolic pulpit (bēma) representing Mani's throne. Hymns specific to the Bēma, preserved in Coptic and Middle Persian, exalted Mani's victory and the community's eschatological hope, marking the ritual's role in annual renewal without sacramental elements like baptism or Eucharist, which Manichaeans rejected as insufficient for true liberation.[31][33][30]Ascetic Disciplines and Communal Organization
The Elect, the ascetic core of Manichaean society, adhered to stringent disciplines aimed at liberating light particles from matter, including lifelong celibacy to avoid imprisoning souls in new bodies, strict vegetarianism limited to light-colored vegetables and fruits like melons to facilitate light release without harm, and abstinence from alcohol, meat, and any actions damaging plants or water.[34] [29] They renounced personal property, engaging in poverty and itinerancy rather than agriculture, trade, or servile labor, which were deemed polluting.[29] Daily practices encompassed seven prayers and a single sacred meal to ingest and free light, with communal gatherings on Mondays for the Elect.[34] Hearers, the lay supporters, followed milder rules but sustained the Elect through almsgiving of prepared food, clothing, and shelter, thereby assuming the karmic burden of necessary sins like killing plants or animals during provision, enabling the Elect's purity.[34] This symbiotic system underscored the Elect's dependence on Hearers for material needs, while Hearers gained spiritual merit and potential future elevation to Elect status.[29] Manichaean communities were hierarchically structured, led by a supreme head such as the Arčag, succeeded by twelve apostles or teachers, seventy-two bishops overseeing regions, and three hundred sixty presbyters or elders managing local groups, with women admitted among the broader Elect.[28] [18] This organization facilitated missionary expansion and ritual observance, dividing into spiritual and administrative units mirroring cosmic orders, though male dominance prevailed in leadership roles.[34] Local cells operated semi-autonomously under bishops, emphasizing communal confession, fasting on designated Yimki days, and annual Bēma festivals commemorating Mani's death.[34]Historical Expansion
Initial Spread in the Sasanian Empire
Mani, born in 216 CE in southern Mesopotamia under Sasanian rule, initiated the public proclamation of his teachings around 240 CE, during the reign of Shapur I (r. 241–272 CE). This period of relative religious tolerance under Shapur I, who sought to integrate diverse elements following the empire's establishment after the Parthian overthrow, enabled Mani to propagate Manichaeism without initial state interference.[35][5] Mani's doctrine, presented as the culmination of prior revelations from Zoroaster, Buddha, and Jesus, attracted converts among the Parthian nobility and urban populations in Mesopotamia and Persis. He dedicated his work Shabuhragan to Shapur I, composing it in Middle Persian to appeal to the royal court and facilitate elite adoption, though the king himself adhered to Zoroastrianism. Missionaries dispatched by Mani established communities in key centers like Ctesiphon and Gundeshapur, leveraging trade networks and court connections for dissemination across the empire's western and central provinces.[36][7] By the mid-3rd century, Manichaean organization with its hierarchy of Elect and Hearers had taken root, supporting ascetic practices and communal support systems that sustained growth amid Zoroastrian dominance. This foundational phase saw expansion into eastern Sasanian territories, setting the stage for further outreach, until escalating tensions with Zoroastrian clergy culminated in persecution under Bahram I (r. 271–274 CE), who ordered Mani's execution in 274 CE.[35][7]Penetration into the Roman Empire
Mani dispatched his disciple Adda (also known as Addas) on a mission to the Roman Empire, targeting the Syrian frontier during the ascendancy of Odaenathus at Palmyra circa 262–266 CE.[37] Other missionaries, including Thomas to Syria and Hermas to Egypt, facilitated initial evangelistic efforts along the empire's eastern borders.[38] These activities leveraged trade routes and cultural exchanges between the Sasanian and Roman spheres, enabling Manichaean teachings—syncretizing elements of Zoroastrianism, Christianity, and Buddhism—to appeal to diverse groups seeking explanations for evil and salvation.[37] By the late third century, Manichaean communities had established themselves in Egypt, where the faith gained a foothold before expanding across North Africa, Asia Minor, the Balkans, and into Italy, including Rome.[39] The religion's promise of esoteric knowledge and ascetic practices attracted intellectuals and urban dwellers amid the empire's religious pluralism, though its Persian origins often fueled suspicions of foreign subversion.[40] Primary evidence of this penetration includes Manichaean texts and artifacts recovered from sites like the Fayum in Egypt, indicating organized elect (ascetic leaders) and hearers (lay supporters) by the 290s CE.[41] The extent of Manichaean presence prompted imperial response: Emperor Diocletian issued an edict around 297 CE condemning the sect as a "monstrous" Persian import, ordering the execution of its leaders and the burning of scriptures, with property confiscation for adherents.[42] This decree, addressed to the proconsul of Africa, reflects the faith's visibility in provincial administration centers and its perceived threat to Roman unity, yet underground networks persisted, sustaining transmission despite sporadic enforcement.[43]Dissemination Along Central Asian Trade Routes
Manichaeism disseminated eastward from the Sasanian Empire along the Silk Road trade routes shortly after Mani's death in 274 CE, facilitated by organized missionary efforts and the mobility of merchants.[44] Mani himself dispatched elect missionaries to regions including the eastern territories, where Parthian and Sogdian traders encountered and adopted the faith, integrating it into commercial networks spanning from Mesopotamia to the Tarim Basin.[4] By the 4th century CE, Persian Manichaean missionaries had secured converts among Sogdian communities, whose language became a key medium for translating Manichaean scriptures and propagating doctrines via caravan routes.[44] In Sogdia, a central hub of Silk Road commerce, Manichaeism competed with Zoroastrianism, Buddhism, and Nestorian Christianity, gaining traction through syncretic adaptations that appealed to merchant classes valuing ascetic ethics compatible with long-distance trade.[45] Archaeological evidence from sites like Turfan and Khocho reveals Manichaean temples, wall paintings depicting clerical hierarchies, and bilingual texts in Sogdian and Middle Persian, attesting to sustained communities by the 8th century CE.[46] The religion's emphasis on light-dark dualism resonated in cosmopolitan trading posts, where elect ascetics provided spiritual guidance to hearer merchants, fostering institutional growth amid diverse cultural exchanges. A pivotal expansion occurred in 763 CE when Uighur Khagan Bögü Qaghan (r. 759–779 CE) converted to Manichaeism during a military campaign allied with Tang China against An Lushan rebels, influenced by Sogdian Manichaeans in his entourage.[46] This royal adoption elevated Manichaeism to the state religion of the Uighur Khaganate, prompting the construction of monasteries and the translation of texts into Old Uighur, which extended its reach into the Tarim Basin oases like Qocho.[44] Uighur patronage preserved Manichaean art and liturgy until the Mongol invasions disrupted these networks in the 13th century, though remnants persisted in isolated pockets.[4] Trade routes thus served as conduits for both doctrinal transmission and material culture, evidenced by silk paintings and diagrammatic cosmologies unearthed in Central Asian ruins.[45]Adaptation and Presence in China
Manichaeism entered China during the 6th century CE via Central Asian intermediaries and Silk Road networks, with initial undocumented presence among Sogdian traders predating official records.[47] The first documented introduction occurred in 719 CE, when a Manichaean envoy (Mo-zak) from the king of Tokharistan presented scriptures at the Tang court.[47] It gained limited imperial favor under Emperor Gaozong (r. 650–683 CE) and Empress Wu Zetian (r. 684–705 CE), though a 731 CE edict restricted conversion to non-Chinese subjects.[47] A pivotal expansion came in 762 CE when Uighur Khan Moyu (Bögü, r. 759–779 CE) adopted Manichaeism as the state religion of the Uighur Khaganate following military aid to the Tang against rebels, leading to the establishment of temples in Chang'an, Luoyang, and four other cities.[47] This patronage facilitated doctrinal dissemination through Chinese translations, such as the Sutra of the Two Principles, which framed Manichaean dualism in terms compatible with indigenous cosmology.[47] Archaeological evidence, including texts from Dunhuang's Mogao Caves dating to before the 9th century, confirms active clerical communities and liturgical practices.[48] Following the Uighur Empire's collapse in 840 CE and a 843 CE Tang suppression that closed temples and executed priests, Manichaeism persisted underground in southern China, particularly Fujian Province and Quanzhou during the Five Dynasties period (907–960 CE).[47] Adaptation involved syncretism with Buddhism and Taoism: Mani was reinterpreted as an avatar of Laozi or the "Buddha of Light" (Mingfo), allowing integration into local pantheons and disguise as a Buddhist sect under the name Mingjiao ("Bright Teaching").[47] This fusion enabled survival amid persecutions, including post-1120 CE crackdowns linked to the Fang La rebellion, where Manichaean networks were accused of fomenting unrest.[47] By the Song Dynasty (960–1279 CE), it operated as a secretive ascetic movement with strict vegetarianism and white-robed elect, influencing folk rituals like rain prayers in central provinces.[49] The Cao'an Temple in Jinjiang, Fujian— the sole extant Manichaean structure worldwide—exemplifies this endurance, with Song-era activity evidenced by inscribed bowls marked "Mingjiao Hui" (Assembly of the Bright Teaching) unearthed nearby in 1979–1983.[50] Refurbished under Mongol rule around 1280 CE and bearing a 1339 CE Yuan inscription, it features a 154 cm granite statue of "Mani the Buddha of Light" in dhyana mudra on a lotus base, alongside a 1445 CE Ming carving invoking Manichaean light symbolism.[47][50] To evade eradication, practitioners overlaid Buddhist and Taoist elements, transforming it into a purported Buddhist site by the 1930s while preserving core devotions to Mani.[50] Ming-era suppressions further marginalized it, associating adherents with rebellious secret societies, though blended rituals endured in local worship into the 20th century.[49] By the early 1900s, overt communities had vanished, leaving Cao'an as a preserved relic blending Manichaean iconography with Han-style depictions of Mani as a haloed prince.[47][49]Persecutions and Suppression
Manichaeans faced severe persecutions from multiple empires and religions, leading to executions, forced conversions, and suppression of communities, but no reliable sources provide an estimated total death toll due to the historical period and lack of comprehensive records.Zoroastrian Opposition in Persia
Manichaeism initially flourished under the patronage of Shapur I (r. 240–270 CE), who permitted Mani to propagate his teachings across the Sasanian Empire, including missions to eastern territories.[51] Zoroastrian clergy, however, perceived Manichaeism's dualistic cosmology and syncretic elements—incorporating Zoroastrian, Christian, and Buddhist motifs—as a direct challenge to orthodox Zoroastrianism, the empire's established state religion intertwined with royal legitimacy.[52] This opposition intensified as Manichaean ascetic practices and rejection of Zoroastrian rituals undermined the magi's sacrificial authority and economic privileges derived from temple estates.[51] Following Shapur I's death in 270 CE, his successor Hormizd I (r. 270–271 CE) briefly continued tolerance, but Bahram I (r. 271–274 CE) elevated the Zoroastrian high priest Kartir to prominence, empowering him to enforce religious orthodoxy.[53] Kartir, in his inscriptions at Ka'ba-ye Zartosht, explicitly claimed to have "struck down" Manichaeans alongside other non-Zoroastrian groups, reflecting a campaign to eradicate perceived heresies threatening imperial unity.[54] Mani was summoned to the royal court in Gundeshapur, where he faced accusations from Kartir of magical practices and doctrinal deviation; imprisoned upon arrival, he died in custody circa 277 CE, reportedly from flaying or starvation, marking the onset of systematic persecution.[53][55] The execution of Mani triggered widespread suppression of his followers under Bahram I and his successors, including the murder of the apostle Mar Sisin in 291 CE and the slaughter of many followers under Bahram II (r. 274–293 CE), with Kartir's influence leading to the destruction of Manichaean scriptures and communities in Persia proper.[54] Many elect and hearers fled westward to the Roman Empire or eastward along trade routes, preserving the faith despite the loss of its Sassanid heartland.[52] This Zoroastrian backlash stemmed from causal fears of religious pluralism diluting the empire's ideological cohesion, as Sassanid rulers relied on magi support to legitimize conquests against Rome and internal rivals.[56]Imperial Decrees and Violence in Rome
The earliest imperial response to Manichaeism in the Roman Empire came under Emperor Diocletian, who on March 31, 297, issued an edict from Alexandria condemning the sect as a pernicious Persian superstition that corrupted Roman morals and customs.[39] The decree mandated severe punishments: Manichaean leaders were to be burned alive, their followers sentenced to forced labor in mines, and confiscated texts destroyed, reflecting concerns over the faith's foreign origins amid ongoing Roman-Persian tensions.[18] This rescript, addressed to the proconsul of Africa, set a precedent for equating Manichaean practices with treasonous innovation, though enforcement varied by region.[43] Subsequent emperors intensified restrictions as Christianity gained dominance. In 372, Valentinian I and Valens promulgated Codex Theodosianus 16.5.3, prohibiting Manichaean assemblies, conversions, and property transfers, with penalties escalating to exile or death for persistence.[39] Under Theodosius I, a series of edicts from 381 onward stripped Manichaeans of civil rights, including the ability to inherit or bequeath property, and mandated death for clergy in 382, framing the sect as a heretical threat to imperial unity.[57] By 389, further laws ordered the expulsion of Manichaeans from Rome and the confiscation of their assets, rendering their wills void and barring them from legal recourse.[57] These measures, compiled in the Theodosian Code, authorized widespread confiscations and executions, though actual violence often involved local officials enforcing banishments and property seizures rather than mass pogroms.[57] Violence manifested primarily through state-sanctioned penalties, such as burnings and mine labor under Diocletian, and capital punishments under Theodosius, which targeted leaders to dismantle organizational structures.[18] Historical accounts, including those from anti-Manichaean Christian writers like Augustine of Hippo, describe isolated arrests and forced renunciations in urban centers like Rome and Carthage, but systematic eradication proved uneven due to the sect's secretive networks.[58] By the late fourth century, these decrees contributed to a gradual suppression, with Manichaean communities in the West diminishing through legal marginalization rather than singular cataclysmic events, though eastern provinces saw prolonged resistance until Justinian's era.[59]Islamic Era Restrictions and Erasure
Following the Arab conquests of the 7th century CE, Manichaean communities in former Sasanian territories such as Mesopotamia and Persia initially persisted under Umayyad rule with limited overt suppression, as Islamic authorities focused on consolidating power rather than doctrinal purity. However, the establishment of the Abbasid Caliphate in 750 CE marked a turning point, with Manichaeism increasingly equated with zandaqa—a pejorative term for dualist heresy perceived as undermining monotheistic orthodoxy by positing an eternal evil principle. Unlike Jews and Christians, who received dhimmi protections as "People of the Book," Manichaeans were denied such status, rendering them vulnerable to arbitrary confiscation of property, forced conversion, or execution without legal recourse.[60][61] Caliph al-Mahdi (r. 775–785 CE) formalized this hostility through an inquisition-like apparatus in circa 780 CE, appointing officials such as the jurist Sahl b. Harb al-Abadi to interrogate suspects, seize Manichaean scriptures, and enforce penalties including public burnings and impalements for those refusing to recant; historical accounts record dozens of executions in Baghdad alone during his reign, targeting both overt adherents and suspected crypto-Manichaeans among Muslim intellectuals. Successor caliphs al-Hadi (r. 785–786 CE) and Harun al-Rashid (r. 786–809 CE) intensified these measures, with al-Rashid ordering the destruction of Manichaean texts and temples in response to perceived threats from dualist influences infiltrating court circles. These policies were driven by theological incompatibility—Manichaean cosmogony's radical dualism clashed with Islamic tawhid (absolute oneness of God)—and political calculus, as Manichaean networks along trade routes facilitated dissent akin to earlier Zoroastrian or Khurramite revolts.[60][62][61] By the 9th century CE, overt Manichaean presence had eroded in the caliphate's heartlands, with communities in Iraq and Iran either assimilating covertly—often masquerading as Sunni Muslims while preserving esoteric doctrines—or migrating eastward to Khorasan and Transoxiana, where tolerance fluctuated under local Samanid and Ghaznavid rulers until stricter enforcement post-900 CE. The 10th-century Abbasid persecutions under al-Muqtadir (r. 908–932 CE) culminated in the near-total erasure of institutional Manichaeism in Islamic domains, as inquisitorial raids destroyed libraries and disrupted transmission; surviving fragments in Arabic sources, such as those compiled by Ibn al-Nadim in his 987 CE Fihrist, attest to this suppression but derive from hostile polemics rather than neutral records. In conquered provinces like Syria and Egypt, Manichaeism vanished by the 8th century CE amid broader Islamization pressures, with no archaeological evidence of post-conquest temples or artifacts, reflecting both coercive elimination and demographic attrition from emigration or apostasy.[63][60][61]Final Bastions and Coercive Assimilation
Following the collapse of the Uyghur Khaganate in 840 CE, the Kingdom of Qocho in the Turfan region emerged as a key eastern bastion for Manichaeism, where it served as the faith of the ruling elite alongside growing Buddhist influences.[64] By the late 10th century, however, Qocho's Uyghurs largely abandoned Manichaeism in favor of Buddhism, contributing to its regional decline; the kingdom itself fell to Mongol conquest in the 1210s–1230s, after which surviving Manichaean elements were overshadowed by Buddhism and, later, Islam.[64] [65] In southern China, particularly Fujian province amid Quanzhou's maritime trade networks, Manichaeism persisted longer through adaptation and limited visibility. During the Tang dynasty, in 843 CE, Emperor Wuzong ordered the killing of all Manichaean clerics as part of the Huichang persecution of foreign religions including Buddhism, with over half dying. Communities there, influenced by Persian merchants and Uyghur migrations, maintained practices into the Yuan dynasty (1271–1368), as evidenced by the 1339 carving of a Mani statue at the Cao'an temple in Jinjiang, the sole surviving Manichaean temple structure worldwide.[66] [67] This endurance stemmed from syncretic blending with local Buddhism, allowing outward conformity while preserving core rituals underground. The Ming dynasty's rise in 1368 marked intensified coercive assimilation, with Manichaeism—known locally as Mingjiao—banned in 1370 due to the phonetic similarity of its name to the dynastic title, prompting state-driven persecutions that forced conversions, temple destructions, and dispersal of adherents.[4] [68] Followers responded by further embedding Manichaean elements into Buddhist and folk traditions, such as venerating Mani as a "Radiant Buddha," but sustained imperial edicts and social pressures eroded distinct communities by the 15th century, effecting near-total assimilation or extinction in China.[67] [48] Isolated traces lingered in Fujian into the early modern era, yet without institutional support, the religion dissolved into heterodox sects like those ancestral to the White Lotus Society.[68]Decline and Contributing Factors
The decline of Manichaeism resulted from a combination of internal doctrinal rigidities, competitive pressures from dominant faiths, logistical and demographic challenges, and sustained persecutions across the Sasanian Empire, Roman Empire, Tang China, Abbasid Caliphate, and other regions. These persecutions entailed executions of leaders and adherents, suppression of communities, and forced assimilation, playing a major role in the religion's gradual eradication by the 14th century. However, due to sparse historical records and the gradual nature of the suppression, no reliable sources provide an estimated total death toll from these measures.[26]Internal Doctrinal Rigidities
Manichaeism's core dualism, which eternally opposed unmixable realms of light and darkness with matter construed as invasive darkness contaminating divine particles, precluded doctrinal flexibility and imposed uncompromising ethical demands. The elect, comprising the clerical elite responsible for liberating light through ascetic praxis, adhered to celibacy, vegetarianism excluding even plant destruction where possible, mendicancy, and prohibition on manual labor or property ownership to evade complicity in cosmic entrapment. These precepts, derived from Mani's third-century teachings emphasizing light's particulate diffusion in organic forms, curtailed elect reproduction and recruitment, as adherence required renunciation of familial and economic norms incompatible with most adherents' lives.[24][69] This bifurcated structure—elect as passive beneficiaries of hearers' labor and alms, with hearers promised vicarious salvation but barred from elect status without equivalent austerity—engendered internal strains. Hearers, permitted marriage, meat consumption (prepared ritually), and commerce, sustained the elect but risked doctrinal lapses in daily affairs, fostering dependency that strained resources amid persecutions and migrations. The system's rigidity amplified demographic vulnerabilities, as elect celibacy yielded negligible natural growth, relying on conversions that proved elusive given the elite's esoteric burdens.[69][65] Compounding these issues, the faith's elaborate cosmogony—detailing primordial invasions, archontic hierarchies, and eschatological separations via celestial mechanisms—demanded intricate scriptural exegesis preserved in Mani's canon, yet transmission faltered without widespread literacy or institutional stability. Absolutist claims of doctrinal finality, positioning Manichaeism as the perfected synthesis beyond Zoroastrianism, Buddhism, or Christianity, resisted adaptive reinterpretations, limiting appeal in pluralistic milieus where rivals accommodated vernacular practices.[69][26]Competitive Pressures from Dominant Faiths
In the Roman Empire, Manichaeism vied with Christianity for adherents, particularly among literate urban populations drawn to its syncretic cosmology, but Christianity's alignment with imperial authority decisively tilted the competition. Following Emperor Constantine's conversion and the Edict of Milan in 313 CE, which legalized Christianity and extended toleration to other faiths including Manichaeism, the former rapidly consolidated institutional networks through episcopal hierarchies and charitable outreach that appealed to broader social strata beyond Manichaeism's ascetic elect.[70] By 380 CE, Theodosius I's decrees establishing Nicene Christianity as the state religion endowed it with fiscal privileges, public infrastructure for worship, and coercive mechanisms against rivals, enabling sustained missionary expansion that eroded Manichaean communities.[39] Christian polemicists further undermined Manichaean credibility by portraying its dualism as incompatible with scriptural monotheism, fostering conversions among former adherents like Augustine of Hippo, who after nine years as a Manichaean auditor renounced it in 386 CE and composed refutations emphasizing Christianity's unified soteriology.[24] This combination of state-backed propagation and doctrinal critique rendered Manichaeism marginal by the 6th century in the West and East Roman territories.[24] In Sasanian Persia, Zoroastrianism exerted competitive dominance through its entrenched priestly class and alignment with royal legitimacy, viewing Manichaeism as a deviant offshoot that distorted core tenets like the ultimate goodness of creation. While Shapur I (r. 240–270 CE) initially tolerated Mani's teachings, subsequent rulers such as Bahram I (r. 271–274 CE) favored Zoroastrian orthodoxy, leading to efforts by magi to proselytize Manichaeans via debates and incentives in the 4th century, capitalizing on Manichaeism's perceived foreign (Aramaic-script) elements despite its adoption of Avestan terminology.[71] Zoroastrianism's ethical framework, which integrated matter into a divine order rather than condemning it as inherently evil, resonated more with agrarian and martial Persian society, outpacing Manichaeism's rigorous dietary and celibacy demands that limited lay participation.[72] Over time, this theological affinity and institutional entrenchment prompted defections, accelerating Manichaeism's contraction before the Arab conquests.[71] Along Central Asian routes and in China, Buddhism overwhelmed Manichaeism through adaptive syncretism and imperial endorsement, absorbing its motifs while supplanting its distinct identity. Introduced to China around 650 CE via Sogdian traders, Manichaeism initially masqueraded as a Buddhist variant, employing terms like "monk" for elect and Maitreya eschatology, but Tang dynasty policies from 731 CE onward restricted foreign faiths, favoring Buddhism's established monasteries and philosophical depth.[73] The 843 CE edict under Wuzong banned Manichaean temples, prompting survivors to integrate into Buddhist sects, where Manichaean light symbolism merged into folk practices but lost doctrinal autonomy.[65] Buddhism's emphasis on karma and rebirth offered a less absolutist dualism, attracting converts amid Song dynasty (960–1279 CE) revivals that emphasized Chan meditation over Manichaean cosmogony, leading to near-total assimilation by the 14th century.[73] Under Islamic rule from the 7th century, Manichaeism faced marginalization as its radical dualism clashed with Quranic tawhid, preventing classification as a protected "People of the Book" faith despite initial Umayyad tolerance (661–750 CE) for Central Asian communities. Abbasid caliphs like al-Mahdi (r. 775–785 CE) issued edicts equating Manichaeans with atheists, curtailing public practice and driving adherents eastward or into concealment, where Islam's egalitarian umma and jihad mobilization outrecruited Manichaeism's hierarchical elect system.[74] [7] In regions like Khorasan, Islamic scholarship dismissed Manichaean texts as zandaqa (heretical innovation), eroding intellectual appeal and prompting conversions amid fiscal pressures on non-Muslims.[74] This doctrinal incompatibility and expansionist vigor confined Manichaean remnants to peripheral enclaves until their dissolution.[69]Logistical and Demographic Challenges
The hierarchical structure of Manichaean society, dividing adherents into the ascetic Elect—who practiced celibacy, vegetarianism, and strict poverty—and the supportive Hearers, who engaged in worldly activities to provision the Elect, inherently limited demographic expansion.[69] The Elect's mandatory celibacy prevented natural reproduction within the clerical class, forcing reliance on conversions from Hearers, a process hampered by the demanding lifestyle requirements that deterred mass adherence and retention.[69] This resulted in persistently small core communities, with estimates suggesting Manichaean populations numbered in the tens of thousands at peak, insufficient for resilience against external pressures.[65] Geographical dispersion across Eurasia, from the Roman Empire through Central Asia to China via Silk Road trade networks, exacerbated logistical vulnerabilities by isolating congregations and complicating centralized leadership.[65] Communication and doctrinal uniformity relied on itinerant missionaries and merchants, but disruptions in overland commerce—such as those from nomadic invasions or shifting political boundaries in the 8th–10th centuries—severed supply lines for texts, relics, and personnel, weakening cohesion.[13] Persecutions in core regions like Sassanid Persia and the Roman Empire further scattered survivors eastward, creating fragmented outposts ill-equipped for unified response or succession planning, as evidenced by the eventual assimilation of remnant groups in Tang China by the 14th century.[75]Criticisms and Theological Controversies
Zoroastrian Critiques of Impiety
In the late 3rd century CE, Zoroastrian high priest Kartir, serving under Sassanid kings including Bahram I (r. 271–274 CE) and Bahram II (r. 274–293 CE), spearheaded efforts to suppress Manichaeism as a form of zandikism, or heretical misinterpretation of Zoroastrian scriptures.[54] His inscriptions at sites like Naqsh-e Rajab and the Ka'ba-ye Zardosht explicitly list Manichaeans (termed zandīks) among groups such as Jews, Christians, Mandaeans, and Buddhists targeted for persecution, declaring that "Jews, Sramans, Brahmins, Nasoreans, (Gnostic) Christians, Maktak, and Zandiks in the empire were smitten."[76] This campaign culminated in the execution of Mani himself in 277 CE, followed by the slaughter of many followers, framed as purging influences aligned with Ahriman (the destructive spirit) and daevas (demons).[54] [76] Zoroastrian critiques portrayed Manichaean dualism as impious for positing two co-principled, eternal forces—light and darkness—thereby diminishing Ahura Mazda's absolute sovereignty over creation, in contrast to orthodox Mazdayasnianism where Angra Mainyu remains a subordinate adversary ultimately destined for defeat. Manichaeism's identification of matter with inherent evil and spirit with unalloyed good justified extreme asceticism and rejection of worldly engagement, which clashed with Zoroastrian affirmation of the material world's essential goodness as Ohrmazd's handiwork, despite its corruption by evil; such views were deemed a denial of divine order and thus profane.[77] [72] Further impiety stemmed from Mani's syncretic claims, integrating Zoroastrian elements like Zurvanite influences while subordinating Zoroaster to a sequence of prophets culminating in himself, an innovation seen as blasphemous usurpation that corrupted the Avesta and Zand commentaries.[54] Kartir's rhetoric emphasized destroying "demon dens" and false beliefs (kēs), equating Manichaean teachings with devilish deceptions that lured adherents away from proper Mazda-worship and ritual purity.[76] These objections reinforced state policy, with imperial decrees under Bahram II enforcing suppression to safeguard Zoroastrian orthodoxy against what was viewed as demonic infiltration rather than legitimate reform.[54]Christian Polemics on Heresy and Dualism
Early Christian writers, particularly from the fourth century onward, condemned Manichaeism as a grave heresy for its radical dualism, which posited two coeternal and uncreated principles—light (good) and darkness (evil)—in direct opposition to the monotheistic doctrine of a singular, omnipotent Creator God who formed all things ex nihilo and declared creation "very good" (Genesis 1:31).[78] This dualistic framework was viewed as undermining divine sovereignty, implying that evil possessed independent ontological reality rather than being a corruption or privation within a good creation, thereby absolving God of responsibility for material existence while introducing a metaphysical parity between good and evil that echoed Persian Zoroastrianism more than biblical theology.[79] Critics argued that such views rendered God impotent against an equally primordial adversary, contradicting scriptural affirmations of God's absolute power over darkness and chaos (Isaiah 45:7).[80] Serapion of Thmuis, in his treatise Against the Manichees composed around 350 CE, mounted a hermeneutical assault on Manichaean scriptural exegesis, accusing them of arbitrarily allegorizing texts to evade the literal goodness of creation and the incarnation.[81] He contended that Manichaean dualism distorted Genesis by portraying the material world as a demonic prison rather than God's handiwork, and he refuted their denial of Christ's true humanity by insisting on the integrity of the flesh assumed in the incarnation, which their aversion to matter as inherently evil rejected.[82] Serapion emphasized that true heresy lay in this selective interpretation that prioritized Manichaean cosmology over apostolic tradition, warning that it severed Christianity from its Jewish roots and the unified witness of Old and New Testaments.[83] Ephrem the Syrian (c. 306–373 CE), in his polemical hymns, lambasted Manichaean dualism as a fabricated "lineage" of false gods and principles, mocking their elect and hearers' ascetic divisions as elitist inventions alien to Christ's inclusive gospel.[84] He argued that by deeming the body and procreation evil—products of the dark principle—Manichaeans slandered the Creator who formed humanity in His image (Genesis 1:27), and their rejection of meat and marriage as polluting echoed pagan superstitions rather than Pauline freedom from legalistic burdens (Colossians 2:16–23).[84] Ephrem's rhetoric highlighted dualism's practical absurdities, such as the impossibility of fully separating light particles from matter, which undermined their own soteriology of liberation through vegetarianism and celibacy.[84] Augustine of Hippo, having adhered to Manichaeism for nine years before his conversion in 386 CE, produced the most extensive refutations, including Contra Faustum (c. 397 CE), where he systematically dismantled dualist claims by demonstrating the harmony between Old Testament prophecies and Christ's fulfillment, against Manichaean dismissal of the Hebrew scriptures as tainted by a flawed creator.[78] In works like De Actis cum Felice Manichaeo, Augustine debated Manichaean leaders publicly, exposing dualism's logical inconsistencies—such as an eternal evil warring against an omnipotent good—and affirming that evil arises from free wills' misuse of good creatures, not an autonomous anti-principle.[78] He further critiqued their docetic Christology, which portrayed Jesus as a mere phantom of light to avoid defilement by flesh, as incompatible with the bodily resurrection attested in the Gospels (Luke 24:39).[78] These polemics framed Manichaeism not as a benign alternative but as a seductive heresy blending Christian terminology with pagan dualism, ultimately eroding faith in a providential God.[78] John Chrysostom (c. 347–407 CE) targeted Manichaean distortions of Christology, arguing in homilies that their dualism necessitated a non-incarnate, non-suffering Savior, contradicting the historical reality of the crucifixion and resurrection as redemptive acts in material history (1 Corinthians 15:3–4).[80] Overall, these patristic critiques coalesced around dualism's incompatibility with core Christian tenets: creation's goodness, God's unity and almightiness, and the somatic reality of salvation, portraying Manichaeism as a syncretic threat that privatized evil metaphysically while evading moral accountability.[78][80]Philosophical Objections to Eternal Matter
In Manichaean cosmology, matter—identified with the realm of darkness—was regarded as an eternal, uncreated substance inherently opposed to the divine realm of light, with particles of light substance trapped within it through a primordial cosmic conflict.[85] This doctrine positioned matter as co-eternal with God, rejecting the notion of creation ex nihilo and instead positing a dualistic ontology where evil exists as a positive, independent principle rather than a privation or corruption of the good.[24] Critics, particularly from Neoplatonic and Christian philosophical traditions, objected that such a view undermines divine sovereignty by implying an irreducible duality of eternal principles, each with autonomous causal power, which precludes a singular, omnipotent source of all reality.[86] Augustine of Hippo, a former Manichaean adherent who converted to orthodox Christianity around 386 CE, argued in works such as De Moribus Manichaeorum that eternal matter as an evil substance leads to logical incoherence: if matter is inherently and eternally evil, its mixture with light particles presupposes a vulnerability in the divine realm, suggesting that God is not immutable or supreme but subject to external corruption and perpetual strife.[85] He contended that this dualism fails first-principles reasoning on causality, as it cannot explain the origin of the conflict without invoking arbitrary, uncaused events between two co-equals, thereby multiplying entities unnecessarily and evading the simpler explanation of evil as the absence or perversion of good within a unified creation.[87] Augustine further critiqued the doctrine for its materialist implications, where the soul's entrapment in matter reduces spiritual liberation to a mechanical extraction of light particles, incompatible with rational accounts of free will and moral agency.[88] Neoplatonist influences, echoed in early Christian polemics, raised objections rooted in ontological hierarchy: eternal matter as a substantive evil contradicts the emanationist model where all being derives hierarchically from the One, rendering multiplicity (light vs. darkness) not primordial but derivative, and matter as potentiality rather than an antagonistic equal.[89] Proponents of this critique, including figures like Plotinus in his attacks on Gnostic dualisms akin to Manichaeism, argued that positing matter's eternity introduces an infinite regress in explaining cosmic order, as the separation and recombination of principles lack a foundational telos or purpose beyond endless oscillation.[90] Such views, while framed theologically, highlight philosophical flaws in Manichaean causal realism, where the eternity of evil matter presupposes unresolvable symmetries that diminish explanatory power compared to monistic frameworks.[91]Accusations of Elitism and Social Division
The Manichaean community maintained a strict dual-class system comprising the Elect, who pursued radical asceticism including celibacy, vegetarianism, and renunciation of property to liberate divine light from matter, and the Hearers, lay adherents who sustained the Elect through alms and labor while adhering to milder prohibitions such as occasional fasting and ethical commerce.[92] This arrangement was doctrinally framed as interdependent, with the Hearers' material contributions enabling the Elect's spiritual efforts to benefit both groups' salvation by extracting light particles from defiling substances.[13] Critics, particularly from Christian orthodoxy, accused this hierarchy of fostering elitism by elevating the Elect as spiritually superior, an arrogance Augustine of Hippo—himself a former Hearer—denounced as intellectual and ascetic pretension that marginalized the masses in favor of a self-proclaimed gnostic vanguard.[93] Augustine contrasted the Manichaeans' insular, "elitist" enclave with the inclusive Catholic Church, arguing the system bred exclusivity and rejected the broader ecclesial unity where all faithful shared sacramental access without tiered spiritual castes.[93] He further critiqued the inherent elitism in the Elect-Hearer divide, viewing it as promoting undue claims to moral prowess that excused the Elect from productive labor while burdening Hearers with perpetual subordination. The social divisions engendered by this structure drew broader condemnation for undermining communal cohesion, as the rigid separation discouraged intermarriage, shared rituals, and equitable participation, potentially exacerbating class tensions in diverse urban settings where Manichaeism spread. Opponents like Roman imperial authorities and rival faiths portrayed the Elect's detachment as antisocial parasitism, contributing to legal proscriptions that targeted the sect's perceived threat to societal order through institutionalized inequality.[94] Such critiques persisted in polemical literature, framing Manichaean organization not as redemptive symbiosis but as a divisive mechanism that privileged esoteric knowledge over universal moral accountability.[93]Legacy and Enduring Influences
Impact on Early Christian Thinkers like Augustine
Augustine of Hippo adhered to Manichaeism for approximately nine years, from around 373 to 382 AD, beginning in his late teens while studying in Carthage. Attracted by its promise of rational synthesis between Christian teachings and philosophy, he found its dualistic cosmology appealing as it posited evil as deriving from an independent principle of darkness invading the realm of light, thereby avoiding attributing moral imperfection to a singular divine creator.[95][96] Disillusionment set in after encountering the Manichaean bishop Faustus in 383 AD, whose inability to resolve Augustine's queries on biblical interpretation and natural phenomena—such as the movements of celestial bodies—undermined the sect's claims to scientific and scriptural superiority. This period of doubt, detailed in Augustine's Confessions (composed circa 397–400 AD), transitioned him toward skepticism, Neoplatonism, and eventual Catholic conversion in 386 AD.[97][98] Post-conversion, Augustine produced over a dozen treatises refuting Manichaean doctrines, including On the Morals of the Manichaeans (388 AD) and Against Faustus, leveraging his insider perspective to critique its ascetic elitism, rejection of the Old Testament's integrity, and materialist views of divinity. These works fortified orthodox Christian apologetics against dualism, emphasizing evil as privation of good rather than a co-eternal substance.[85][86] Scholars debate the persistence of Manichaean elements in Augustine's mature theology, with some positing indirect influences on his doctrines of predestination and irresistible grace, potentially echoing Manichaean determinism where human will is captive to cosmic forces until divine intervention. However, Augustine explicitly rejected such residues, framing his anti-Pelagian writings as affirmations of scriptural grace over fatalistic predetermination.[99][100] Beyond Augustine, Manichaeism prompted engagements from other early Christian figures, such as Ephrem the Syrian (d. 373 AD), who composed hymns denouncing its cosmogony as incompatible with biblical monotheism, and Serapion of Thmuis (4th century), who addressed its appeal to intellectuals seeking esoteric knowledge. These polemics, while primarily adversarial, spurred refinements in Trinitarian and creation ex nihilo doctrines within patristic thought.[11][101]Traces in Medieval Heresies and Eastern Traditions
The Paulicians, a dualistic sect active in Armenia and eastern Anatolia from approximately the 7th to 10th centuries CE, incorporated elements traceable to Manichaean cosmology, including a distinction between a spiritual realm of light and a material world dominated by darkness, though their doctrines are primarily known through hostile Byzantine sources.[102] These ideas influenced the Bogomils, who arose in 10th-century Bulgaria under the priest Bogomil and propagated a moderate dualism positing a good God of spirit opposed by a fallen demonic principle responsible for the physical world; scholars have described Bogomilism as Balkan Neo-Manichaeism due to parallels in rejecting Old Testament authority, docetism regarding Christ's incarnation, and ascetic hierarchies of elect and hearers.[103] [102] Bogomil teachings spread westward, contributing to the Cathar or Albigensian movement in southern France by the mid-12th century, where communities espoused radical dualism with two coeternal principles—one of light and one of darkness—mirroring Manichaean eschatological battles and reviling matter as inherently corrupt, evidenced in rituals like the consolamentum baptism for spiritual elect.[102] However, while doctrinal affinities exist, direct transmission from Manichaeism via Paulicians and Bogomils to Cathars remains conjectural, as radical Cathar ontology diverged by framing evil as a separate god rather than a lesser principle within a single divine framework, and primary evidence for unbroken lineage is sparse, reliant on medieval inquisitorial records.[102] Cathar strongholds, such as Montségur, fell to crusaders by 1244 CE, effectively eradicating organized groups by 1330 CE.[102] In Eastern traditions, Manichaeism endured in China as Mingjiao from the Song dynasty (960–1279 CE), adapting core dualism of light versus darkness through syncretism with Buddhism and Daoism, including depictions of Mani as a luminous prophet akin to a Buddha figure.[50] Communities persisted into the Yuan (1271–1368 CE) and Ming (1368–1644 CE) dynasties, centered in Fujian province, where the Cao'an temple—erected during the Song era and featuring a 1339 CE stone statue of "Mani the Buddha of Light"—served as a ritual site for prayers invoking cosmic salvation and rebirth in realms of light.[50] Official persecution under the Ming, including bans on Mingjiao nomenclature, led to its decline, though fragmented practices survived in familial ethics and folk veneration until blending into local religions by the early modern period.[50]Rediscovery Through Archaeological Finds
Archaeological excavations in the early 20th century profoundly reshaped understanding of Manichaeism by uncovering primary texts and artifacts long after its suppression. German expeditions to the Turfan oasis in Xinjiang, China, from 1902 to 1914, retrieved over 10,000 fragments of Manichaean manuscripts from ruined temple libraries at sites including Khocho and the Bezeklik Thousand Buddha Caves. These documents, inscribed in Middle Persian, Parthian, Sogdian, and Uighur, encompassed theological treatises, numerous poetic texts and hymn collections, and illuminated paintings depicting Manichaean cosmology and elect clergy, demonstrating the religion's adaptation and persistence in Central Asia until the 14th century. Additionally, Manichaean manuscripts were discovered among the documents from the library cave at the Mogao Grottoes in Dunhuang, including the Xiabu zan (Lower Section Hymns), a Chinese scroll containing around thirty hymns and prayers, along with other liturgical and confessional texts such as the Xuāstvānīft. These discoveries of numerous Manichaean poetic texts and hymn collections in sites such as Turfan and Dunhuang have enhanced understanding of Manichaean liturgy and literature.[104][48][105] In Egypt, a 1931 expedition by Italian archaeologists at Medinet Madi in the Fayum region yielded seven intact Coptic Manichaean codices from the 3rd to 4th centuries CE, including the Kephalaia of the Teacher and the Psalms of Thomas, a collection of poetic psalms. These works detailed doctrinal expositions, liturgical practices, and community organization within Roman provincial settings, contrasting with earlier reliance on polemical accounts from adversaries like Augustine of Hippo.[106][107] The 1969 discovery of the Cologne Mani Codex, a diminutive Greek parchment codex (measuring 3.8 by 4.5 cm) acquired from antiquities dealers in Luxor, provided a rare biographical narrative on Mani's origins and early ministry, drawing from lost Syriac sources and emphasizing his prophetic self-conception. Subsequent excavations at Kellis in Egypt's Dakhleh Oasis from the 1980s onward uncovered over 5,000 papyri fragments, including personal letters and ritual texts from a 4th-century Manichaean household, illuminating everyday adherence and familial transmission of the faith.[108][109] These finds, corroborated across disparate regions, established Manichaeism's transnational scope and textual richness, enabling reconstructions of its scriptures and rituals independent of medieval heresiographies, though challenges persist in deciphering fragmentary and multilingual corpora.[110]Modern Scholarly Reassessments and Analogies
The field of Manichaean Studies has emerged as a dedicated academic discipline, with the International Association of Manichaean Studies (IAMS), founded in 1989 as a non-profit organization, promoting research on all aspects of Manichaeism through international collaboration and resources.[111] IAMS organizes periodic conferences, such as the Tenth Conference held in 2022 at Aarhus University, fostering advancements in textual analysis and historical interpretation.[112] Key publication series include the Brill "Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies" series, which disseminates peer-reviewed works on Manichaean texts and related Gnostic traditions.[113] Modern scholarship, particularly since the early 20th-century excavations at Turfan and subsequent finds in Egypt and Central Asia, has shifted assessments of Manichaeism from reliance on adversarial accounts by Christian and Zoroastrian polemicists toward analysis of primary texts, revealing a more coherent and adaptive religious system than previously portrayed. Scholars such as Jason BeDuhn have emphasized the rational structure of Manichaean ethics and ritual, arguing that practices like the Elect's dietary restrictions were not mere asceticism but a principled response to the ontology of light particles entrapped in matter, supported by textual evidence from Coptic and Parthian manuscripts that demonstrate deliberate discipline over bodily impulses rather than hypocritical restraint.[114] This reassessment counters earlier dismissals of Manichaeism as irrational dualism, highlighting its empirical basis in observing the world's mixture of generative and destructive forces, akin to causal mechanisms in natural processes rather than abstract moral allegory.[115] Iain Gardner's 2020 analysis of Mani's life further recontextualizes the faith's founder not as a syncretic borrower but as an innovator who co-evolved doctrines alongside contemporaneous Zoroastrian reforms in the Sasanian Empire, drawing on Middle Persian fragments to show Mani's strategic engagement with imperial courts for propagation rather than isolation.[116] BeDuhn similarly posits that Manichaeism and Zoroastrianism developed in tandem during the third century CE, challenging narratives of unilateral appropriation and underscoring shared cultural substrates in late antique Mesopotamia without implying dependency.[14] These views privilege textual archaeology over biased ecclesiastical histories, attributing prior distortions to competitors' incentives to delegitimize a rival universalist movement that integrated Christian, Buddhist, and Iranian elements into a non-ethnic framework adaptable across empires from Rome to China.[117] In contemporary analogies, Manichaeism's radical dualism—positing eternal, unmixable realms of light and darkness with matter as a battlefield for light's reclamation—has been invoked to critique oversimplified binaries in modern ideologies, though such usages often misrepresent the original's nuanced cosmology where evil arises from darkness's invasion rather than symmetric opposition.[118] For instance, the faith's view of salvation through liberating divine sparks parallels ecological concerns with contamination and purification, as light particles diffused into organic matter evoke efforts to extract value from polluted systems, a comparison noted in analyses of Manichaean vegetarianism as proto-environmental ethic grounded in particle ontology.[25] Philosophically, its rejection of a singular creator reconciling good and evil anticipates critiques in analytic traditions of theodicy, aligning with causal realism in viewing observed suffering as evidence of active adversarial principles rather than divine permission, though scholars caution against anachronistic projections that ignore the religion's theistic hierarchy under a supreme Father of Greatness.[119] These parallels underscore Manichaeism's enduring relevance in dissecting worldviews that privilege empirical dualities over monistic harmonizations.Chronology
The following table outlines key events in the history of Manichaeism:| Approximate Date | Event |
|---|---|
| c. 216 CE | Birth of Mani in southern Mesopotamia, near Ctesiphon in the Sasanian Empire. |
| c. 228–240 CE | Mani is raised in an Elkasite (Jewish-Christian baptist) community. |
| c. 240 CE | Mani receives his first revelation from his divine Twin (Syzygos). |
| 242–274 CE | Mani's public ministry, travels, writings (including the Living Gospel, Book of Giants, etc.), and conversions; gains initial support from Sasanian rulers like Shapur I. |
| c. 274–277 CE | Execution of Mani ordered by Bahram I. |
| Late 3rd century CE | Rapid spread to the Roman Empire via missionaries. |
| 297 CE | Roman Emperor Diocletian issues an edict persecuting Manichaeans. |
| 373–382 CE | Augustine of Hippo adheres to Manichaeism as a Hearer before converting to Christianity. |
| 5th–7th centuries CE | Dissemination along Central Asian trade routes (Silk Road). |
| 694 CE | First recorded Manichaean missionary reaches the Tang Chinese court. |
| 732 CE | Tang dynasty issues an edict granting freedom of worship to Manichaeans in China. |
| 8th–9th centuries CE | Manichaeism becomes the state religion of the Uyghur Khaganate. |
| 13th–14th centuries CE | Final suppression and extinction of organized communities in China under Mongol Yuan and Ming dynasties. |
Glossary of Key Terms
- Elect — The elite, monastic class of Manichaeans who observed strict ascetic rules, including vegetarianism, celibacy, and non-violence, to liberate entrapped light particles from matter.
- Hearers — The lay congregation who supported the Elect materially and followed ethical guidelines without the full ascetic commitment.
- Father of Greatness — The supreme, transcendent deity in the realm of pure light.
- Primal Man — The divine warrior emanated to battle the forces of darkness in the cosmogonic myth.
- Living Spirit — A savior figure who fashions the cosmos as a mechanism to trap and eventually redeem light particles.
- Column of Glory — The luminous pathway (manifested as the sun, moon, and Milky Way) by which liberated light ascends back to the divine realm.
- Syzygos — Mani's heavenly twin or divine counterpart who delivered revelations.
- Three Times/Eras — The cosmological framework: (1) primordial separation of light and darkness, (2) current era of mixture and conflict, (3) final era of separation and salvation.
Regional Variations and Adaptations
Manichaeism exhibited regional adaptations while maintaining core doctrines:- Persian/Sasanian Manichaeism — The original form, heavily influenced by Zoroastrian dualism and terminology.
- Roman/Western Manichaeism — Adapted to Greco-Roman and Christian contexts, portraying Mani as a successor to Jesus and emphasizing anti-materialist ethics.
- Central Asian Manichaeism — Flourished among Turkic peoples, notably the Uyghurs, with unique textual and artistic traditions.
- Chinese Manichaeism (Mingjiao) — Syncretized with Buddhism, Daoism, and folk religion; survived longest, sometimes disguised as a Buddhist sect.
Historical Statistics and Spread
Manichaeism was one of the major religions of late antiquity and the early medieval period. At its peak (roughly 4th–10th centuries CE), it likely had millions of adherents across Eurasia, from the Roman Empire in the west to China in the east. It established significant communities in urban centers of Mesopotamia, Egypt, North Africa, Persia, Central Asia, and China. Precise figures are unavailable due to its persecuted status and lack of centralized records, but contemporary sources describe it as a widespread rival to Christianity and Zoroastrianism in certain regions. The religion is now extinct as an organized faith, with the last known communities disappearing in China by the 14th century CE. Remnants may persist in isolated cultural traces, such as the Cao'an temple in Fujian province, China.Cosmological Stages (Chart)
The following table summarizes the Manichaean cosmological myth in its "Three Times":| Stage | Name | Description | Key Developments |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Time | Primordial Separation | Light and Darkness exist in eternal, unmixed realms. | Peaceful coexistence; no interaction. |
| Second Time | Invasion and Mixture | Darkness invades light; Primal Man is sent to fight. | Creation of the world as a trap for demons; light particles trapped in matter; current era of conflict and entrapment. |
| Third Time | Final Separation | Salvation process completes. | Light fully liberated; Darkness confined forever; restoration of original order. |
._Seal_with_figure_of_Mani,_possibly_3rd_century_CE,_possibly_Irak._Cabinet_des_Médailles,_Paris.jpg)