Hubbry Logo
Palestinian traditional costumesPalestinian traditional costumesMain
Open search
Palestinian traditional costumes
Community hub
Palestinian traditional costumes
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Palestinian traditional costumes
Palestinian traditional costumes
from Wikipedia
A woman from Ramallah
A Palestinian Arab woman from Ramallah, photographed by the American Colony Photo Department, c. 1929–1946
Chest panel from Gaza dress

Palestinian traditional clothing are the types of clothing historically and sometimes still presently worn by Palestinians. Foreign travelers to Palestine in the 19th and early 20th centuries often commented on the rich variety of the costumes worn, particularly by the fellaheen or village women. Many of the handcrafted garments were richly embroidered and the creation and maintenance of these items played a significant role in the lives of the region's women.

Though experts in the field trace the origins of Palestinian clothing to ancient times, there are no surviving clothing artifacts from this early period against which the modern items might be definitively compared. Influences from the various empires to have ruled Palestine, such as Ancient Egypt, Ancient Rome and the Byzantine Empire, among others, have been documented by scholars largely based on the depictions in art and descriptions in literature of costumes produced during these times.

Until the 1940s, traditional Palestinian clothing reflected a woman's economic and marital status and her town or district of origin, with knowledgeable observers discerning this information from the fabric, colours, cut, and embroidery motifs (or lack thereof) used in the apparel.[1]

In 2021, The art of embroidery in Palestine, practices, skills, knowledge and rituals was inscribed on the UNESCO Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity.[2]

Origins

[edit]
Palestinian young woman of Bethlehem in costume
Palestinian girl of Bethlehem in costume, Ottoman Syria, between 1890 and 1900
A photograph by Khalil Raad of a woman wearing the Palestinian traditional costume of Ramallah in 1920

Geoff Emberling, director of the Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures, notes that Palestinian clothing from the early 19th century to World War I show "traces of similar styles of clothing represented in art over 3,000 years ago."[3]

Hanan Munayyer, collector and researcher of Palestinian clothing, sees examples of proto-Palestinian attire in artifacts from the late Levantine Bronze Age (1500 BC) period such as Egyptian paintings depicting Canaanites in A-shaped garments.[4] Munayyer says that from 1200 BC to 1940 AD, all Palestinian dresses were cut from natural fabrics in a similar A-line shape with triangular sleeves.[4] This shape is known to archaeologists as the "Syrian tunic" and appears in artifacts such as an ivory engraving from Megiddo dating to 1200 BC.[4][5]

In Palestine: Ancient and Modern (1949) produced by the Royal Ontario Museum of Archaeology, Winifred Needler writes that "no actual clothing from ancient Palestine has survived and detailed descriptions are lacking in the ancient literature". In their length, fullness, and use of pattern these modern garments bear a general resemblance to the costumes of West Asian people seen in ancient Egyptian and Assyrian monuments. The dress of the daughters of Zion is mentioned in Isaiah 3:22–24:

In that day, my Sovereign will strip off the finery of the anklets, the fillets, and the crescents;

of the eardrops, the bracelets, and the veils; the turbans, the armlets, and the sashes; of the talismans and the amulets; the signet rings and the nose rings; of the festive robes, the mantles, and the shawls; the purses,

the lace gowns, and the linen vests; and the kerchiefs and the capes.

This suggests that feminine city fashions of Isaiah's day may have resembled modern Palestinian country dress.[6]

Needler also cites well-preserved costume artifacts from late Roman-Egyptian times consisting of "loose linen garments with patterned woven bands of wool, shoes and sandals and linen caps," as comparable to modern Palestinian costumes.[6]

Family in Ramallah c. 1900

The shift from woven to embroidered designs was made possible by artisanal manufacture of fine needles in Damascus in the 8th century. Embroidered dress sections, like the square chest piece (qabbeh) and decorated back panel (shinyar) prevalent in Palestinian dresses, are also found in costume from 13th-century Andalusia. Each village in Palestine had motifs that served as identifying markers for local women.[4] Common patterns included the eight-pointed star, the moon, birds, palm leaves, stairs, and diamonds or triangles used as amulets to ward off the evil eye.[3][4]

Social and gender variation

[edit]

Traditionally, Palestinian society has been divided into three groups: villagers, townspeople, and Bedouins. Palestinian costumes reflected differences in the physical and social mobility enjoyed by men and women in these different groups in Palestinian society.

The villagers, referred to in Arabic as fellahin, lived in relative isolation, so older, more traditional costume designs were found most frequently in the dress of village women. The specificity of local village designs was such that "A Palestinian woman's village could be deduced from the embroidery on her dress."[7]

Townspeople (Arabic: baladin) had increased access to news and an openness to outside influences that was naturally also reflected in the costumes, with town fashions exhibiting a more impermanent nature than those of the village. By the early 20th century, well to-do women (and men) in the cities mainly had adopted Western wear. Typically, Ghada Karmi recalls in her autobiography how in the 1940s in the wealthy Arab district of Katamon, Jerusalem, only the maids, who were local village women, donned traditional Palestinian dresses.

Due to their nomadic lifestyle, Bedouin costumes reflected tribal affiliations rather than affiliations to a localized geographic area.

As in most of the Middle East, men's clothing was more uniform than women's clothing.

Weaving and fabrics

[edit]

Woolen fabrics for everyday use were produced by weavers in Majdal, Bethlehem, Ramallah, and Jerusalem. The wool could be from sheep, goats or camels.[8][9] Weaving among the Bedouin was and is still traditionally carried out by women to create domestic items, such as tents, rugs, and pillow covers. Thread is spun from sheep's wool, colored with natural dyes, and woven into a strong fabric using a ground loom.[10]

Linen woven on hand-looms and cotton were mainstay fabrics for embroidered garments.[11] However, cotton was not widely used until the end of the 19th century when it began to be imported from Europe.[8] Fabrics could be left uncoloured or dyed various colours, the most popular being deep blue using Indigo dye, others being black, red and green. In 1870 there were ten dyeing workshops in the Murestan quarter of Jerusalem, employing around 100 men.[12][13]

According to Shelagh Weir, the colour produced by indigo (nileh) was believed to ward off the evil eye, and frequently used for coats in the Galilee and dresses in southern Palestine.[11] Indigo dyed heavy cotton was also used to make sirwals or shirwals, cotton trousers worn by men and women that were baggy from the waist down but tailored tight around the calves or ankles. The wealthier the region, the darker the blue produced; cloth could be dipped in the vat and left to set as many as nine times. Dresses with the heaviest and most intricate embroidery, often described as 'black', were made of heavy cotton or linen of a very dark blue.[14] Travellers to Palestine in the 19th and 20th centuries represented pastoral scenes of peasant women donned in blue going about their daily tasks, in art and literature.[11]

Because of the hot climate and for reasons of prestige, dresses were cut voluminously, particularly in the south, often running twice the length of the human body with the excess being wrapped up into a belt. For more festive dresses in southern Palestine, silks were imported from Syria with some from Egypt.[15] For example, a fashion of the Bethlehem area was to interlay stripes of indigo-blue linen with those of silk.[14]

Fashions in towns followed those in Damascus, Syria.[15] Some producers in Aleppo, Hama and Damascus produced styles specifically for the Palestinian market.[16] Weavers in Homs produced belts and some shawls exclusively for export to Nablus and Jerusalem.[17]

Majdali weaving
Majdali weaving. Gaza 1950s

The production of cloth for traditional Palestinian costumes and export throughout the Arab world was a key industry of the destroyed village of Majdal. Majdalawi fabric was produced by a male weaver on a single treadle loom using black and indigo cotton threads combined with fuchsia and turquoise silk threads. While the village no longer exists today, the craft of Majdalawi weaving continues as part of a cultural preservation project run by the Atfaluna Crafts organization and the Arts and Crafts Village in Gaza City.[10]

Palestinian embroidery

[edit]
Village woman
Village woman, c. 1900

Diverse motifs were favored in Palestinian embroidery and costume as Palestine's long history and position on the international trade routes exposed it to multiple influences.[18] Before the appearance of synthetically dyed threads, the colors used were determined by the materials available for the production of natural dyes: "reds" from insects and pomegranate, "dark blues" from the indigo plant: "yellow" from saffron flowers, soil and vine leaves, "brown" from oak bark, and "purple" from crushed murex shells.[19] Shahin writes that the use of red, purple, indigo blue, and saffron reflected the ancient color schemes of the Canaanite and Philistine coast, and that Islamic green and Byzantine black were more recent additions to the traditional palette.[20] Shelagh Weir, author of Palestinian costume (1989) and Palestinian embroidery (1970), writes that cross-stitch motifs may have been derived from oriental carpets, and that couching motifs may have origins in the vestments of Christian priests or the gold thread work of Byzantium.[21] Simple and stylized versions of the cypress tree (saru) motif are found throughout Palestine.[18]

Longstanding embroidery traditions were found in the Upper and Lower Galilee, in the Judean Hills, and on the coastal plain.[21] Research by Weir on embroidery distribution patterns in Palestine indicates there was little history of embroidery in the area from the coast to the Jordan Valley lying to the south of Mount Carmel and the Sea of Galilee, and to the north of Jaffa and from Nablus to the north. Decorative elements on women's clothing in this area consisted primarily of braidwork and appliqué.[18] "Embroidery signifies a lack of work," an Arab proverb recorded by Gustaf Dalman in this area in 1937, has been put forward as a possible explanation for this regional variation.[18]

Village women embroidering in locally-distinctive styles was a tradition that was at its height in Ottoman-ruled Palestine.[3] Women would sew items to represent their heritage, ancestry, and affiliations. Motifs were derived from basic geometric forms such as squares and rosettes.[18] Triangles, used as amulets, were often incorporated to ward off the "evil eye", a common superstition in the Middle East. Large blocks of intricate embroidery were used on the chest panel to protect the vulnerable chest area from the evil eye, bad luck and illness.[19] To avoid potential jinxes from other women, an imperfection was stitched in each garment to distract the focus of those looking.[3]

Girls in Bethlehem costume
Girls in Bethlehem costume pre-1918, Bonfils Portrait

Girls would begin producing embroidered garments, a skill generally passed to them by their grandmothers, beginning at seven. Before the 20th century, most young girls were not sent to school. Much of their time outside of household chores was spent creating clothes, often for their marriage trousseau (or jhaz) which included everything they would need in terms of apparel, encompassing everyday and ceremonial dresses, jewelry, veils, headdresses, undergarments, kerchiefs, belts and footwear.[3][22]

In the late 1930s, new influences introduced by European pattern books and magazines promoted the appearance of curvilinear motifs, like flowers, vines or leaf arrangements. They introduced the paired bird motif, which became very popular in central Palestinian regions.[18] John Whitting, who put together parts of the Museum of International Folk Art collection, has argued that "anything later than 1918 was not indigenous Palestinian design, but had input from foreign pattern books brought in by foreign nuns and Swiss nannies".[23] Others say the changes did not occur before the late 1930s, when embroidery motifs local to certain villages could still be found. Geometric motifs remained popular in the Galilee and southern regions, like the Sinai Desert.[18]

Men's clothing

[edit]

Some professions, such as the Jaffa boatmen, had their own unique uniforms. The horse or mule drivers (mukaaris), widely used between the towns in an age before proper roads, wore a short embroidered jacket with long sleeves slit open on the inside, red shoes and a small yellow woolen cap with a tight turban.[24]

History

[edit]

Post-1948

[edit]
Front of dress (qabbeh).
Front of dress (qabbeh) sold as cushion cover, Ramallah, 2000

The 1948 Palestinian expulsion and flight led to a disruption in traditional modes of dress and customs, as many women who had been displaced could no longer afford the time or money to invest in complex embroidered garments.[25] Widad Kawar was among the first to recognize the new styles developing after the Nakba.

New styles began to appear in the 1960s. For example, the "six-branched dress" named after the six wide bands of embroidery running down from the waist.[26] These styles came from the refugee camps, particularly after 1967. Individual village styles were lost and replaced by an identifiable "Palestinian" style.[27]

The shawal, a style popular in the West Bank and Jordan before the First Intifada, probably evolved from one of the many welfare embroidery projects in the refugee camps. It was a shorter and narrower fashion, with a western cut.[28]

Income generating projects in the refugee camps and in the Occupied Territories began to use embroidery motifs on non-clothing items such as accessories, bags and purses. With the evolution of the different groups distinct styles are beginning to be appear. Sulafa the UNRWA project[29] in the Gaza Strip has exhibited work at Santa Fe, New Mexico. Atfaluna,[30] also from Gaza, working with deaf people, sells its products through the internet. West Bank groups include the Bethlehem Arabs Women's Union,[31] Surif Women's Cooperative,[32] Idna,[33] the Melkite Embroidery Project (Ramallah).[34] In Lebanon Al-Badia,[35] working in the Refugee Camps, is known for high quality embroidery in silk thread on dresses made of linen. The Jerusalem-based Fair Trade organisation Sunbula,[36] is working to improve the quality and presentation of items so that they can be sold in European, American and Japanese markets.

Geography

[edit]
  • Jerusalem: The Jerusalem elite followed Damascus fashions which in turn were influenced by those of the Ottoman court in Istanbul. Fabrics were imported from Syria with several specialist shops on the Mamilla Road. Wedding dresses were ordered from Aleppo and Turkey. From the beginning of the 20th century the upper classes began to wear European styles.[37]
  • Galilee: Collections reveal that there was a distinct Galilee women's style from at least the middle of the 19th century. The standard form was a coat (Jillayeh), tunic and trousers.[38] Cross-stitch was not used much, the women preferring patchwork patterns of diamond and rectangular shapes, as well as other embroidery techniques.[39][40] In the 1860s, H.B. Tristram described costumes in the villages of El Bussah and Isfia as being either "plain, patched or embroidered in the most fantastic and grotesque shapes".[41] Towards the beginning of the 20th century Turkish/Ottoman fashions began to dominate: such as baggy trousers and cord edging.[42][43][44] Materials, particularly silks, were brought from Damascus.[45] Before the arrival of European colour-fast dyes the Galilee was an important area for the growing of indago and sumac which were used for creating blue and red dyes.[46]
  • Nablus: Women's dresses from villages in the Nablus area were the least ornate in the whole of Palestine.[47][48]
Modern couching stitch from Bayt
Modern couching stitch from Bayt Jalla traditionally used on panels of malak wedding dress
  • Bethlehem: Wadad Kawar describes Bethlehem as having been "the Paris of Central Palestine".[49] Both it and neighbouring Bayt Jalla were known for their fine Couching Stitch work. This technique was used extensively in the panels for malak (queen) wedding dresses. The malak dress was popular amongst brides from the villages around Jerusalem. So much so that the panels began to be produced commercially in Bethlehem and Bayt Jalla. Amongst the wealthier families it was the fashion for the groom to pay for the wedding dress so the work often became a display of status.[50][51]
  • Ramallah: A variety of very distinguishable finely executed patterns.
Doll in wedding-dress typical of Ramallah area
Doll in wedding-dress typical of Ramallah area popular before 1948. Made by YWCA project in Jalazone RC. c. 2000.

Garment types

[edit]

Basic dress

[edit]
  • Palestinian thobe, loose fitting robe with sleeves, the actual cut of the garment varied by region.
      • qabbeh; the square chest panel of the Thob, often decorated
  • [ Banayiq Side panels of the thob]
      • diyal; brocaded back hem panel on the Bethlehem dress.
      • shinyar; lower back panel of the dress, decorated in some regions
  • Libas; pants,
  • Jubbeh; jacket, worn by men and women,
  • Jillayeh; embroidered jubbeh, often the embroidered outer garment of a wedding costume,
  • Shambar; large veil, common to the Hebron area and southern Palestine.

Headdress

[edit]
A woman wearing fishnet pattern keffiyeh,
A woman wearing fishnet pattern keffiyeh, Paris

The women in each region had their distinctive headdress. The women embellished their headdresses with gold and silver coins from their bridewealth money. The more coins, the greater the wealth and prestige of the owner (Stillman, p. 38);

  • Shaṭweh[52] is a distinctive conical hat "shaped rather like an upturned flower pot" only worn by married women. Used mainly in Bethlehem, also in Lifta and Ayn Karim in the District of Jerusalem, and Beit Jala and Beit Sahour near Bethlehem [53] The shatweh is used to keep the iznaq (chin chain) in place.[54]
  • Smadeh[55] used in Ramallah, consists of an embroidered cap, with a stiff padded rim. A row of coins, tightly placed against another, is placed around the top of the rim. Additional coins might be sown to the upper part or attached to narrow, embroidered bands. As with the other women's head-dresses, the smadeh represented the wearers bridal wealth, and acted as an important cash reserve. One observer wrote in 1935: "Sometimes you see a gap in the row of coins and you guess that that a doctor's bill has had to be paid, or the husband in America has failed to send money" (quoted in Stillman, p. 53.)
  • Araqiyyeh[4], used in Hebron. The words ʿaraqiyyeh and taqiyyeh have been used since the Middle Ages in the Muslim world to denote small, close-fitting head-caps, usually of cotton, which were used by both sexes. The original purpose was to absorb sweat (Arab: "araq"). In the whole of Palestine, the word taqiyyeh continued to be used about the simple skull-cap used nearest to the hair. In the Hebron area, however, the word araqiyyeh came to denote the embroidered cap with a pointed top a married woman would wear over her taqiyyeh. During her engagement period, a woman of the Hebron area would sow and embroider her araqiyyeh, and embellish the rim with coins from her bridal money. The first time she would wear her araqiyyeh would be on her wedding day. (Stillman, p. 61)

The styles of headwear for men have always been an important indicator of a man's civil and religious status as well as his political affiliation: A turban being worn by a townsman and a kaffiyeh by a countryman. A white turban signified a qadi. In the 1790s, the Ottoman authorities instructed the Mufti of Jerusalem, Hassan al-Husayni, to put a stop to the fashion of wearing green and white turbans which they regarded as the prerogative of officially appointed judges.[56] In the 19th century, due to the Qays–Yaman rivalry, white turbans were also worn by Yamanis, while the opposing Qaysis wore red.[57] In 1912, the Palestine Exploration Fund reported that Muslim men from Jerusalem usually wore white linen turbans, called shash. It would be of red and yellow silk in Hebron, in Nablus red and white cotton. Men in Jaffa wore white and gold turbans, similar to the style in Damascus.[58] A green turban indicated a descendant of Muhammed.[59]

From 1880 the Ottoman style of tarboush or fez began to replace the turban amongst the effendi class.[60] The tarboush had been preceded by a rounder version with blue tassel which originated from the Maghreb. The arrival of the more vertical Young Turk version was emancipating for the Christian communities since it was worn by all civil and military officials regardless of religion. The exception was Armenians, who wore a black style.[61]

The European styles, Franjy hat (burneiTah), were not adopted.[62]

The kaffiyeh replaced the tarbush in the 1930s.[63]

Shoes

[edit]

Residents of the major towns, Jerusalem, Jaffa, Ramleh, Lydd, Hebron, Gaza and Nablus, wore soft white sheepskin shoes with the point in front turned up: low cut, not above the ankle, and yellow for men. Before the mid-19th century non-Muslims wore black shoes. Village men wore a higher style fastened at the front with a leather button which provided protection from thorns in the fields. Bedouin wore sandals, made by wandering shoemakers, usually Algerian Jews. The Arabic name for sandal, na'l, is identical to that used in the Bible. On special occasions Bedouin men wore long red boots with blue tassels and iron heels, jizmet, which were made in Damascus.[64]

Collections of Palestinian costumes

[edit]

Examples of Palestinian costumes and related artifacts are housed in several museums and collections, both public and private.

Public collections

[edit]
Bride's wedding attire from Bayt Jibrin.
Bride's wedding attire from Bayt Jibrin in an exhibition at Oriental Institute, Chicago

The following is a list of some of the public collections:

  • British Museum in London. The British Museum holds over 1,000 pre-1948 items in its Palestinian costume collection. Though not on permanent display, highlights of the collection were featured in Shelagh Weir's major 1989 "Palestinian costume" exhibition. Weir's monograph remains the seminal publication on traditional Palestinian costume.
  • The Israel Museum in Jerusalem holds one of the most sizable collections of Palestinian costumes. In 1986–87, the Museum held a major exhibit, "Embroideries from the Holy Land" and, in 1988, published Ziva Amir's The Development and Dissemination of the Chest-Panel of the Bethlehem Embroidery. An art historian, Amir traces the development of motifs (e.g., the floral vase) and the geographic spread of styles. An Israeli, Amir worked closely with Palestinian locals in Gaza and the West Bank.[65]
  • L. A. Mayer Institute for Islamic Art in Jerusalem houses Palestinian costumes and embroidery, dating from the 18th and 19th centuries.[66]
  • Museum of International Folk Art (MOIFA) at Museum of New Mexico at Santa Fe.[67] John Whitting acquired Palestinian items directly from the owners and noted down the provenance of each, thereby making the collection especially informative. There are many items from villages which were destroyed/depopulated in the Nakba in 1948, e.g. al-Qubayba, al-Dawayima, Bayt Dajan, Lifta, Kafr Ana, Bayt Jibrin and az-Zakariyya. The oldest items are traced back to the 1840s, while later examples include a wedding dress from Zakariyya (c. 1930)[68] and a dress from Yatta (c. 1910).[69]
  • Palestine Costume Archive, in Canberra, Australia.[70] The Archive's collections tour worldwide.
  • Tareq Rajab Museum, Kuwait.[71] Based on a private collection, this museum is open to the public and houses a significant Palestinian costume collection, as featured in Jehan Rajab's 1989 monograph Palestinian costume.
  • Olana State Historic Site in Hudson, New York. The collection of Palestinian and Syrian costumes held here, assembled by Frederic Edwin Church and his wife, Isabel, in 1868–1869, is one of the oldest extant.[72]

Private collections

[edit]
  • Widad Kawar Arab Heritage collection.[73] The collection of Ms. Widad Kawar. An important private collection now in Amman, Jordan, the Kawar collection of Palestinian and Jordanian dress toured extensively in the 1980s.
  • The Abed Al-Samih Abu Omar collection, Jerusalem. Private collection, mostly 20th century, featured in the book by Omar (1986): Traditional Palestinian embroidery and jewelry,
  • Palestinian Heritage Foundation; The Munayyer Collection.[74] The largest private collection in America, the Munayyer collection includes costumes from most Palestinian regions well known for distinctive costumes. The collection has been displayed in several American museums.
  • Palestinian Heritage Center, a cultural center located in Bethlehem, established in 1991 by Maha Saca. Has a collection of traditional costumes, some have been exhibited at the Oriental Institute, Chicago.
  • List of worldwide collections of Palestinian costumes, from Palestine Costume Archive

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Palestinian traditional costumes comprise the historical garments of Palestinian , centered on the women's thobe—a loose-fitting, long-sleeved robe embroidered with tatreez, an intricate technique using or threads on fabric to convey regional origins, social status, and personal narratives through motifs such as trees of life, rosettes, and protective symbols. By the mid-19th century, these costumes had developed distinct regional styles across historic , varying in cut, fabric, thread colors, and ensemble components like chest panels (qabbeh) and sleeves, as documented in collections from areas including , , Gaza, and . Originating from ancient practices traceable to at least the 13th century, tatreez embroidery was taught to girls from a young age and incorporated elements like beads, coins, and appliqués, with dresses often serving as heirlooms reused across generations to signify , wealth, and village affiliation. Men's attire, though less variably embroidered, included overcloaks and headdresses, but the thobe's elaboration underscores the costumes' role in preserving cultural continuity amid historical disruptions, evolving from localized expressions to broader symbols of heritage.

Historical Origins and Influences

Ancient and Medieval Roots

Archaeological finds in the southern Levant, including spindle whorls and loom weights from sites like dating to approximately 8000 BCE, demonstrate early production centered on fibers for basic garments such as tunics and wraps. These artifacts indicate linen's dominance as the primary material, with evidence of cultivation and simple techniques persisting through the . Geometric patterns and fringed edges, visible in Canaanite artwork from circa 3000–1200 BCE, suggest functional designs influenced by regional trade with and , rather than isolated developments. Phoenician coastal settlements from around 1200–539 BCE extended these practices through maritime commerce, incorporating dyed textiles like murex purple for elite robes and belts, as inferred from residue analyses and relief depictions. This period's emphasis on export-oriented , including sails and garments, fostered cross-cultural exchanges that introduced ornamental motifs without establishing distinct ethnic exclusivity. Under Byzantine rule (4th–7th centuries CE), Levantine textiles evolved to include wool blends and occasional silk imports, forming layered tunics and cloaks with woven bands, as evidenced by garment fragments from Jordanian sites featuring brooches and buckles for fastening. Early Islamic conquests ( onward) maintained loose robe silhouettes while adding tiraz—inscribed or linen bands with geometric and script motifs—produced in state workshops, drawing from Persian techniques via conquest and trade. By the , Mediterranean and overland routes integrated metallic threads and vegetal patterns into regional fabrics, as seen in Syrian workshop remnants blending local with Central Asian influences, promoting hybrid styles across the without ties to later national constructs. This continuity in materials and motifs underscores adaptive responses to trade over purported indigenous purity.

Ottoman and Early Modern Developments

![Peasant_Family_of_Ramallah_1900-1910.jpg][float-right] Under Ottoman rule from 1516 to 1918, Palestinian women's thobes incorporated indigo-dyed and fabrics, with sourced from cultivated south of the and in the , often used for its deep blue hue believed to ward off the , particularly in regions. These dyes were applied through repeated soaking of handwoven bolts, standardizing darker shades for higher-status garments while lighter ones served everyday wear. Ottoman administrative structures, including sanjaks like those encompassing and southern districts, facilitated trade routes that influenced material availability, resulting in regional adaptations such as prevalent indigo blue coats in northern versus plainer weaves in more arid areas. The structured thobe form solidified during this period, with chest panels known as qabbeh emerging as focal points for using threads imported via Ottoman networks, marking through complexity—elaborate designs denoting wealth and skill, often passed as heirlooms. In mid-19th-century examples from and , indigo grounds supported and motifs tied to local , like the "Tent of " pattern reflecting imperial motifs. Headdresses incorporated Ottoman coins from rulers like Abdülhamid II (r. 1876–1909), blending local craft with imperial symbolism. European travelers' accounts from the late , including observations in , described these embroidered thobes as richly ornamented, with white bases accented by silk tatreez, often misattributed to Christian influences but rooted in rural Muslim and fellahin traditions. Photographs from 1900–1910 depict peasant families in such attire, highlighting urban-rural divides where proximity to administrative centers like allowed greater access to dyed fabrics and metallic threads. Local handloom dominated due to widespread agricultural production and centers, supplemented minimally by European imports after the 1800s for finer silks. In the , early dresses used blue-dyed akin to northern styles but transitioned to black tubayt fabric by the late Ottoman period, adapting to nomadic lifestyles while maintaining for identity. This era's imperial oversight promoted some uniformity in fabric production across divided provinces, yet preserved geographic distinctions in dyeing and panel elaboration.

Core Garments and Components

Women's Thobes and Dresses

The thobe serves as the foundational garment in Palestinian women's traditional attire, constructed as a loose, ankle-length to accommodate the demands of daily life in a characterized by hot summers. Its straight-cut body incorporates side panels, known as banayek or manajel, which provide essential fullness and mobility for physical activities. This design element allows the fabric to drape without constriction, promoting airflow and ease of movement. Structurally, the thobe features front and shoulder yokes that frame the upper body, alongside a front split opening that facilitates donning and removal without requiring full undressing. Sleeves are long and often wide or winged, termed kum irdan in some contexts, enabling arm extension for labor-intensive tasks while maintaining coverage. The hem falls to the ankles, balancing protection from sun and dust with practical length for walking over uneven terrain. For functionality in agrarian work, the thobe is typically gathered at the waist using a belt called hizām, which cinches the excess fabric to prevent snagging during fieldwork or household chores. This adaptation transforms the otherwise voluminous robe into a more fitted when needed, supporting bending, lifting, and prolonged physical exertion without compromising the garment's inherent or comfort. Historical accounts confirm its use as daily wear among women engaged in agricultural labor, underscoring the thobe's evolution as a versatile work dress.

Men's Clothing and Headdress

Traditional Palestinian men's attire emphasized practicality and uniformity across regions, differing from the more varied and embroidered women's clothing, as it served functional needs in agriculture, herding, and rural labor during the Ottoman era. In the , these garments reflected broader styles in Greater under Ottoman administration, with simpler designs prioritizing mobility and weather resistance over decoration. The qamis, a basic long-sleeved or thob, formed the undergarment, typically constructed from or or fine natural . Paired with it were sirwāl, made of , , or , featuring a wide tapering to tight lower legs for unhindered movement. Over these, men donned the jubbeh or qumbaz, an with long narrow sleeves, fashioned from plain or striped cottons, Syrian s, or coarse hand-woven known as abayeh for added protection against rain and cold. Finer versions in roza or ghabani were reserved for special occasions like weddings. Headdress options included the (also hatta or kafiyyeh), a square scarf of , silk, or fine wool in red-and-white or black-and-white checkered patterns, draped over the head and secured with an agal cord, especially in villages and small towns. Bedouins often wore it atop a white taqiyeh skullcap for enhanced sun and dust protection. Regional alternatives encompassed the tarbush, a felt fez-like hat, or the laffeh wound from Syrian or silk fabrics.

Accessories and Footwear

Women's accessories emphasized functionality and economic utility, with belts known as zunnar securing garments and often featuring adornments that doubled as portable stores of value using silver circulated in the . Shawls provided practical coverage against environmental elements, typically woven from wool or to ensure durability in rural and village settings. Headdresses such as the shatweh, a dome-shaped or , incorporated rows of embroidered and -embellished elements, where the silver or coins—sourced from regional and minting—served as tangible indicators rather than mere decoration. Footwear prioritized endurance for agrarian and nomadic lifestyles, consisting of basic leather sandals or shoes crafted from locally tanned hides to withstand rough terrains and daily labor. These utilitarian designs avoided ornate features, focusing on supple materials that allowed mobility without hindrance. For men in urban contexts under Ottoman administration, the tarboosh—a cylindrical felt hat—imposed a standardized accessory, reflecting imperial policies for administrative uniformity across provinces including .

Materials, Techniques, and Craftsmanship

Fabrics and Weaving Practices

Traditional Palestinian fabrics consisted primarily of handwoven cotton and linen derived from local agriculture, with wool incorporated for garments in higher elevations. Cotton was cultivated in coastal plains, including areas near Gaza and al-Majdal, where it formed the basis for durable, breathable textiles suited to the Levantine climate. Linen, produced from flax grown across Palestinian fields, provided lightweight options, often left undyed or indigo-dyed for everyday thobes. Wool, spun from sheep herded in southern highland regions such as Hebron, offered warmth for colder mountainous areas. Weaving practices centered on traditional wooden handlooms known as nol, operated by women in village homes or specialized centers like al-Majdal, , , and . These looms produced narrow strips—typically around 33 cm wide and up to 7 meters long—which were sewn together to form garment panels, yielding plain or striped widths for thobes. Al-Majdal emerged as a key hub for tightly woven fabrics, with historical accounts noting up to 800 looms in operation before 1948, exporting material regionally. Techniques emphasized warp-faced on ground or pit looms, a method documented in Palestinian villages since at least . Natural dyeing, particularly with cultivated in the , imparted the prevalent blue hues to and fabrics, as confirmed by chemical analysis of pre-20th-century garments revealing indigotin compounds. While fabrics like atlas were imported during the Ottoman period for elite use, their adoption waned post-1918 due to high costs from distant sources such as and , shifting preference to affordable, locally produced and for their resilience and climate adaptability.

Embroidery Styles (Tatreez)

Tatreez primarily employs the technique, executed on even-weave fabrics to form geometric motifs through counted stitches that intersect at right angles. This method allows for precise repetition of patterns, facilitating efficient production by skilled embroiderers who memorized sequences passed down through practice. Complementing cross-stitch, the couching technique—known as tahriri—involves laying thicker threads on the fabric surface and securing them with smaller anchoring stitches, enabling curvilinear designs less suited to counted . These techniques utilize threads, often in red, blue, and black hues, occasionally supplemented with for durability in heavier applications, applied to chest panels (qabbeh), side panels (banayeq), and lower hems of thobes. The embroidery process demands specialized tools, including fine metal needles for piercing the open-weave or base, sharp for thread trimming, and sometimes wooden hoops to tension the fabric, though traditional work often proceeded without frames for mobility during communal sessions. In pre-20th-century Palestinian villages, tatreez was a labor-intensive endeavor typically undertaken by women in groups, where shared motifs and stitches accelerated output through collective recall and division of garment sections. A single chest panel could require hundreds of hours, with stitches forming dense coverage—up to 1,000 per square inch in intricate examples—to achieve the characteristic fullness of traditional pieces. Surviving 19th-century samples, such as those from documented in museum collections, demonstrate motif repetition as a practical adaptation for , where basic geometric elements like stars and interlocking lines were modularly combined across generations to minimize reinvention. Analysis of these artifacts reveals consistent stitch densities and thread counts, indicating standardized techniques honed for endurance rather than variation, with floss providing the vibrancy preserved in over 200 documented thobes from the era. This repetition ensured garments could be produced efficiently within village economies, where served as a form of skilled output integrated into daily maintenance.

Variations and Symbolism

Regional and Geographic Differences

In northern regions such as , thobes featured red on undyed or cloth, incorporating geometric motifs like poppies, doves, and palm trees, with bridal variants showing profuse designs influenced by access to natural and later synthetic dyes via trade routes. Southern areas like displayed densely embroidered thobes using and silk , with motifs including trees, rosettes, and patterns such as the "Star of al-Khalil" or "Tent of Pasha," often in deep reds accented by black, green, or white threads derived from local agricultural dyes. Coastal garments from Gaza emphasized simpler, repeated motifs with graceful lines and protective symbols like the cypress tree (sarw) on the back, executed in blues and purples on lighter fabrics such as majdal weaves, adaptations suited to the humid, warm environment and maritime trade in dyes. Inland urban styles in integrated Ottoman-era imports, favoring striped silk (çitari) from or velvet (mekhmal) for ankle-length thobes with tiled chest panels (qabbah) featuring floral elements like the Damascus rose, reflecting elite access to Istanbul-influenced fabrics and metal-thread techniques. Bedouin variants in the Negev prioritized woolen weaves from local , sheep, or sources for durability and tent-like versatility, with confined to functional motifs around hems or necks, enabling greater mobility in arid nomadic conditions compared to the denser settled styles.

Social, , and Status Distinctions

Traditional Palestinian women's thobes conveyed through colors and density, with red threads typically used by married women and blue by unmarried ones, reflecting established social roles within family structures. The intricacy and extent of tatreez further signaled family wealth, as producing elaborate panels required significant time and skill from female artisans, often commissioned for brides from prosperous households to display economic standing during weddings. Men's attire exhibited subtler status markers, with urban elites favoring vests or outer garments in finer fabrics like or with minimal , contrasting the plainer, durable or cotton worn by rural peasants for labor-intensive work. This distinction arose from economic access to imported materials and urban tailoring practices, underscoring class hierarchies tied to occupation and residence. Gender norms were reinforced through coverage and functionality: women's loose thobes and optional veils (such as the mandīl or shambar) promoted in line with Islamic cultural expectations in conservative communities, while men's sirwals and jilbabs allowed greater mobility for agricultural or trade activities.

Evolution in the 20th and 21st Centuries

Pre-1948 Continuity and Changes

During the British Mandate period from 1917 to 1948, Palestinian women's thobes and associated embroidery maintained core stylistic continuity, with regional variations in silhouette, fabric panels, and tatreez motifs persisting among rural and communities. These garments continued to feature hand-stitched geometric patterns symbolizing protection, fertility, and local flora, as embroidery primarily adorned dresses and overcoats until 1948. However, economic changes facilitated by Mandate infrastructure and trade introduced factory-produced silk threads and metallic wires from , supplementing traditional local and while diminishing full-scale hand-weaving in some areas. In urban centers like and , women adapted traditional thobes by layering European-inspired elements, such as fitted jackets or lightweight shawls, over foundational dresses, reflecting ongoing interactions with imported fashions from the Ottoman era into the Mandate period. Ethnographic accounts from indicate that while rural attire resisted rapid change, city dwellers incorporated curvilinear floral designs from European pattern books into tatreez, marking a subtle shift toward hybrid motifs without supplanting geometric traditions. Early 20th-century photography, including works by Palestinian photographers like Khalil Raad and Hanna Toumayan, systematically captured the pre-1948 diversity of costumes across villages and towns, preserving images of embroidered thobes from regions like and . These visual records, often posed portraits emphasizing full attire, documented over 20 distinct regional styles before widespread modernization accelerated, aiding later scholarly analysis of continuity amid encroaching influences.

Post-1948 Dispersal and Adaptation

Following the 1948 displacement of approximately 750,000 , over half from rural areas, traditional costume practices underwent pragmatic adaptations in refugee camps across , , , and Gaza, where by 2000 around 3 million resided under UN auspices. Women simplified thobes by shifting to functional fabrics and later synthetics like acrylics and velour, replacing labor-intensive woven luxury materials amid shortages and economic constraints; ornate accessories such as coined headdresses largely vanished by the . Home-based weaving declined precipitously due to the destruction or abandonment of specialized village centers, such as Mejdel, forcing reliance on cheaper imported textiles and disrupting intergenerational transmission of techniques. Urbanization and recurrent conflicts further eroded rural production bases, with traditional dresses often hybridized by the 1970s through or European-style braids for practicality. Revivals gained traction in the late 1960s via income-generating projects, yielding adaptable forms like the "six-branch" , which permitted variable panel widths to suit scarce resources. In the , women's cooperatives and programs such as UNRWA's Sulafa initiative in camps produced embroidered goods—including shawls, cushions, and dolls—beyond full thobes, blending hand-stitching with efficient machine methods to support family livelihoods. By the 2020s, diaspora markets have driven fusions of tatreez motifs onto contemporary garments, such as denim jackets, evening gowns, skirts, and sneakers, emphasizing sustainable handmade elements over strict historical replication to meet urban, global demands. These shifts prioritize wearable functionality and economic viability, extending 1990s trends of applying heritage embroidery to modern clothing via funded centers.

Cultural Context and Shared Heritage

Connections to Levantine and Broader Arab Traditions

Palestinian traditional thobes share basic silhouettes and construction with those worn in neighboring Levantine regions, including , , and , featuring loose-fitting robes with embroidered chest panels (qabbeh) and side slits for mobility. These garments, typically made from hand-woven or blends, exhibit overlapping color palettes such as and in Syrian and Jordanian variants, reflecting regional availability and climatic adaptations common across the . The , a checkered secured with an agal cord, appears in male attire across Levantine cultures, originating as practical protection against sun, dust, and sand in arid environments predating modern national borders. Worn by Bedouins and villagers under Ottoman rule, it served both genders in variations, with patterns like black-and-white fishnet designs circulating through shared pastoral and agricultural lifestyles in , , , and . Embroidery motifs in Palestinian tatreez, such as geometric arabesques and floral elements, align with broader textile traditions influenced by Islamic artistic conventions that emphasized non-figural designs, including those disseminated during the Abbasid era (750–1258 CE) via trade in woven bands (tiraz) featuring repeating patterns. These shared stylistic elements, including abstract cypress trees and stars, appear in southern Syrian and Jordanian dresses, stemming from common cultural exchanges rather than isolated developments. Sirwāl, loose baggy trousers worn under thobes by both men and women, represent an Arab-wide garment adopted across the from Persian influences via early Islamic expansions and migrations, providing comfort in horseback riding and labor-intensive tasks. Historical trade caravans along Levantine routes and intercommunal marriages under prolonged Ottoman administration (1516–1918) further diffused these attire elements, obscuring strict pre-20th-century distinctions tied to specific locales.

Distinctions from Neighboring Cultures

Palestinian tatreez on the thobe's chest panel (qabbeh) frequently employs curvilinear motifs, such as wave patterns symbolizing local landscapes, particularly in designs executed in deep red tones with geometric accents reflecting agrarian motifs. These differ from Jordanian thobes, where yoke prioritizes linear geometric shapes and tribal-specific patterns, with regional variations in stitch density and motif alignment denoting village or affiliations rather than fluid, nature-inspired curves. In fabric and thread preferences, Palestinian costumes emphasize locally woven bases for everyday thobes, embroidered with durable or threads in muted regional palettes like Hebron's earthy reds, contrasting Lebanese traditions that favor brighter imports for elaborate, less geometrically restrained dresses. The black-and-white , while common in Levantine attire including Jordanian and Lebanese variants, features a distinctive weave in Palestinian examples, tied to coastal symbolism absent in neighboring rectangular or checkered iterations. Post-Ottoman era developments amplified these distinctions through localized and guilds in , fostering specialized techniques like Hebron's wave-embellished qabbeh, independent of Jordanian northern Raqma stitching or Lebanese silk-oriented adaptations.

Preservation, Collections, and Recognition

Major Collections and Archives

The Tiraz Widad Kawar Home for Arab Dress in , , maintains the most extensive archive of Palestinian traditional garments, with over 3,000 items spanning the 19th and 20th centuries, including thobes from regions like , , and Gaza. Assembled by collector Widad Kawar beginning in the mid-20th century from Palestinian villages and urban centers, the holdings feature verifiable examples of regional embroidery techniques, such as tatreez motifs in and metallic threads on or bases, enabling scholarly analysis of evolution and material sourcing. The collection's documentation includes provenance details for items predating 1948, prioritizing authenticity through direct acquisition from wearers or families. The Palestinian Museum in , , curates a dedicated repository of heritage thobes, encompassing over 80 documented dresses from pre-1948 Palestine, such as beige linen examples from Bayt Nabala embroidered in red silk and velvet malak thobes from with sparse, dark-toned tatreez. These artifacts, conserved through specialized processes, represent geographic diversity, including and urban variants, with cataloged details on fabrication dates, fiber compositions, and stitch patterns like the Isdud bride thobe's intricate floral designs. The museum's holdings support empirical verification of motif continuity via internal databases and conservation records. Dar al-Tifel al-Arabi in holds a focused archive, incorporating thobes and related textiles from the absorbed Palestinian Folk Art Museum collection, augmented after 1967 with items from displaced communities, totaling dozens of pre-1948 garments like jellayeh with detailed panels. This repository emphasizes accessible, provenance-tracked pieces for motif cross-referencing, such as geometric and vegetal patterns, though its scale remains smaller than institutional peers. Digital platforms from these archives, including the Palestinian Museum's online thobe listings, enable motif comparison and authenticity checks against physical holdings, reducing reliance on anecdotal sourcing.

UNESCO Inscription and Recent Revivals

In December 2021, inscribed the art of in —known as tatreez and encompassing its practices, skills, knowledge, and rituals—on the Representative List of the of Humanity, emphasizing transmission through oral traditions within communities. This listing, decided during the 16th session of 's Intergovernmental Committee, recognizes tatreez as a practice fostering social cohesion and identity, with documentation highlighting its role in women's gatherings and family rituals. The 2020s have witnessed commercial revivals of tatreez-embellished traditional costumes, driven by online sales platforms and adaptations into modern fashion items, providing economic incentives alongside cultural continuity. Brands such as Nol Collective market tatreez-embroidered jackets priced from $298 to $348, sourcing from Palestinian women artisans and promoting the craft through e-commerce. In 2025, new collections blending tatreez motifs with contemporary apparel have emerged, including launches of heritage-inspired lines sold via social media, capitalizing on global interest in artisanal textiles. These efforts reflect a market response to demand for authentic, handcrafted goods, with sales supporting artisan incomes amid broader globalization pressures that favor mass-produced clothing. Cooperative initiatives have focused on training younger participants to preserve tatreez skills, often integrating economic viability through production for export and . Organizations like the Surif Women's employ hundreds of women in workshops, offering skill-building sessions that extend to youth via community networks, ensuring technique transmission despite and displacement challenges. Similarly, programs such as those under Beit Al Tatreez emphasize workshops combining traditional patterns with marketable products, sustaining the craft economically while countering skill erosion from modern lifestyles. These cooperatives report generating income through international distribution, blending cultural safeguarding with entrepreneurial training for participants as young as teens.

Controversies and Debates

Politicization as National Symbols

In the post-1960s era, following the establishment of the in 1964, Palestinian traditional costumes, particularly the embroidered thobe, underwent a deliberate elevation from regional everyday attire to markers of and resistance. This shift aligned with broader efforts to construct a distinct Palestinian amid the Arab-Israeli conflicts, where embroidery patterns were promoted as emblems of (steadfastness) and cultural continuity, often detached from their prior multifunctional role in village life. Despite this, empirical evidence from pre-1948 collections indicates that such garments reflected local economic and marital statuses rather than nascent , with designs varying by district but rooted in Ottoman-era Levantine practices spanning centuries. The politicization intensified in protest contexts, as seen during the Great March of Return protests beginning on March 30, 2018, and extending into 2019, where women donned thobes to symbolize heritage and defiance, transforming the garment into a softer counterpart to the headscarf. This usage amplified narratives of cultural preservation under occupation, yet critics note it often prioritizes symbolic victimhood over the practical, labor-intensive heritage of rural embroidery cooperatives that predated modern conflicts. Such promotion by PLO-affiliated institutions tended to emphasize exclusivity, overlooking substantial overlaps with Jordanian and broader Arab traditions; for instance, thobe styles and tatreez motifs shared continuity across the region under the British Mandate, where no rigid national boundaries delineated dress until post-1948 displacements. This constructed symbolism has drawn scrutiny for over-romanticizing pre-modern attire as inherently Palestinian, ignoring its millennial antecedents in Canaanite and Byzantine influences that long predated 20th-century . While academic and activist sources frequently frame thobes as tools of gendered , this perspective, prevalent in Western-oriented scholarship, risks eliding the garments' empirical ties to shared Levantine agrarian customs rather than invented exclusivity. Historical collections, such as those documenting 19th-century samples, underscore that regional variations existed without politicized intent, challenging narratives that retroactively impose nationalist causality on apolitical traditions.

Claims of Cultural Appropriation and Authenticity

Allegations of cultural appropriation have targeted Israeli fashion designers for incorporating tatreez embroidery motifs into their collections, with critics arguing that such uses detach the patterns from their Palestinian context and rebrand them as Israeli heritage. These claims, often voiced by Palestinian advocacy groups, overlook tatreez's roots in shared Levantine traditions practiced by Jordanian, Syrian, Lebanese, and communities, where geometric and floral motifs evolved through centuries of regional exchange rather than exclusive ownership. Historical evidence, including ancient symbols in artifacts across the , indicates no pre-Arab indigenous monopoly on these designs, as embroidery techniques reflect adaptive predating modern national boundaries. Authenticity debates intensified following the 1948 displacement, as communities adapted traditional costumes to available materials and influences abroad, resulting in hybrid garments that blend original tatreez with non-native elements like synthetic fabrics or simplified stitches. While such modifications dilute strict adherence to pre-1948 regional styles—evident in village-specific variations like Gaza's heavy or Ramallah's —these evolutions have sustained the craft's transmission, countering total loss amid dispersal. Empirical patterns from collections show increased production of these adapted pieces in camps and , prioritizing continuity over purity. The keffiyeh's integration into global fashion, peaking with trends in 2025 runway shows and commercial sales, has sparked appropriation charges for commodifying a resistance symbol into accessories detached from context. Yet this market response has economically benefited Palestinian manufacturers, with reports of sales surges driven by heightened demand, enabling workshops in the and to expand output using traditional fishnet weaves. Such dynamics illustrate causal trade-offs: broader dissemination risks symbolic dilution but fosters economic incentives for authentic replication, as producers leverage trends to preserve techniques amid competition from mass-produced imitations.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.