Commanding precedent

This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. (May 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In law, a commanding precedent is a precedent whose facts are "on all fours" with the case at hand. In other words, it almost exactly tracks it, sharing near-identical facts and issues.^[1] A commanding precedent is also referred to as a "Goose" case in Louisiana;^[2] "Spotted Horse" or "Spotted Dog" cases in Alabama;^[3] "Cow" case in Kansas;^[4] and "White Horse" or "White Pony" cases in Texas.^[5] A legal rule can be "clearly established" without commanding precedent existing. For example, in the United States, a governmental official is generally protected by qualified immunity if his acts were objectively legally reasonable, but such protection may not apply if, in light of pre-existing law, the unlawfulness of his conduct would have been apparent to a reasonably competent official, even if no commanding precedent applicable to his specific behavior existed.^[6]