Hubbry Logo
search
search button
Sign in
Historyarrow-down
starMorearrow-down
Welcome to the community hub built on top of the Companion case Wikipedia article. Here, you can discuss, collect, and organize anything related to Companion case. The purpose of the hub is to connect people, foster deeper knowledge, and help improve the root Wikipedia article.
Add your contribution
Inside this hub
Companion case

The term companion cases refers to a group of two or more cases which are consolidated by an appellate court while on appeal and are decided together because they concern one or more common legal issues. Depending on the facts of each case, the court may be able to achieve a final resolution of all such cases (e.g., by affirming summary judgment in all of them), or it may have to remand one or more of them for further proceedings such as a trial. In general, one of the companion cases comes first on the case caption and serves as the title of the consolidated opinion that resolves the group of cases.

Appellate courts do not always have to consolidate cases in order to resolve several pending cases with a common legal issue. A related method is to "grant and hold", meaning that while a "lead" case presenting an increasingly common issue is being briefed and argued, all other similar cases that come into the same appellate court are granted review but then are put on hold pending the outcome of the lead case. Once the lead case is decided, the other cases are promptly remanded to the lower courts from which they originated, with directions on how to resolve them in light of the opinion issued in the lead case.

In some instances, companion cases with similar—but not identical—fact patterns are decided with different outcomes, allowing the court to establish fine dividing lines between outcomes revolving on the specific differences in the facts of each case.

Examples

[edit]

The best known examples are at the Supreme Court of the United States. Roe v. Wade[1] famously had a companion case, Doe v. Bolton.[2] McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents[3] was a companion case of Sweatt v. Painter.[4][5]

Administrative boards can also have companion cases, sometimes for more than a dozen cases decided at once.[6]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Add your contribution
Related Hubs