Hubbry Logo
search
search button
Sign in
Historyarrow-down
starMorearrow-down
Hubbry Logo
search
search button
Sign in
Frogger II: ThreeeDeep!
Community hub for the Wikipedia article
logoWikipedian hub
Welcome to the community hub built on top of the Frogger II: ThreeeDeep! Wikipedia article. Here, you can discuss, collect, and organize anything related to Frogger II: ThreeeDeep!. The purpose of the hub is to connect people, foster deeper knowledge, and help improve the root Wikipedia article.
Add your contribution
Inside this hub
Frogger II: ThreeeDeep!
Frogger II: ThreeeDeep!
Atari 5200 box art
Developer(s)Parker Brothers
Publisher(s)Parker Brothers
Programmer(s)Atari 8-bit, 5200
Larry Gelberg[4]
2600
Mark Lesser[4]
ColecoVision
Laura Nikolich[4]
SeriesFrogger
Platform(s)Atari 8-bit, Atari 5200, Atari 2600, ColecoVision, Commodore 64, Apple II, IBM PC
Release
August 1984
  • Atari 8-bit, 5200
    August 1984[1]
    2600
    September 1984[2]
    ColecoVision, C64
    October 1984[3]
    Apple II, IBM PC
    1984
Genre(s)Action
Mode(s)Single-player, multiplayer

Frogger II: ThreeeDeep![a] is a 1984 action video game developed and published by Parker Brothers for the Apple II, Atari 8-bit computers, Atari 2600, Atari 5200, ColecoVision, Commodore 64, and IBM PCs. It is a sequel to Konami's 1981 arcade game Frogger and has similar gameplay.

The goal of Frogger II is to maneuver each frog to a berth at the top of the screen. Once all of the berths are filled, the player progresses to the next level. Unlike its predecessor, it has three consecutive screens for each level rather than one screen per level, with berths at the top of each of the three screens that need to be filled.

Reception

[edit]

In a 1984 review of the Commodore 64 cartridge for Electronic Games, Louise Kohl wrote, "Fans of the original will be very pleased with its successor, and newer fans will find it appealing and challenging as well. A year ago, before the rise of computer action games with their greater emphasis on strategy, this would have been a more exciting release."[6]

Also writing for Electronic Games, Ted Salamone was impressed that the Atari 2600 version "actually looks, plays, and sounds state of the art, all on the lowly 2600". He pointed out some flickering and difficult to distinguish objects, but still called the overall package "flawless".[7] Computer Games gave the Atari 8-bit computer version an A rating, saying it "makes the original look like kid stuff".[8] Computer and Video Games rated the ColecoVision version 48% in 1989.[9]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Add your contribution
Related Hubs