Hubbry Logo
search
search button
Sign in
Historyarrow-down
starMorearrow-down
Hubbry Logo
search
search button
Sign in
Sweyn Haakonsson
Community hub for the Wikipedia article
logoWikipedian hub
Welcome to the community hub built on top of the Sweyn Haakonsson Wikipedia article. Here, you can discuss, collect, and organize anything related to Sweyn Haakonsson. The purpose of the hub is to connect people, foster deeper knowledge, and help improve the root Wikipedia article.
Add your contribution
Inside this hub
Sweyn Haakonsson
Division of Norway after the Battle of Svolder according to the Heimskringla.

Sweyn Haakonsson (Old Norse: Sveinn HĆ”konarson, Norwegian: Svein HĆ„konsson)[1] (died c. 1016) was an earl of the house of Hlaưir and co-ruler of Norway from 1000 to c. 1015. He was the son of earl HĆ”kon Sigurưarson. He is first mentioned in connection with the battle of HjƶrungavĆ”gr, where the Heimskringla says he commanded 60 ships. After the battle of Svolder in the year 1000, Sveinn became co-ruler of Norway with his half-brother, EirĆ­kr HĆ”konarson. After EirĆ­kr went to England in 1014, Sveinn was co-ruler with HĆ”kon EirĆ­ksson. In 1015,[2] ƓlĆ”fr Haraldsson arrived in Norway and claimed the throne. He defeated Sveinn and his allies in the battle of Nesjar. Sveinn retreated to Sweden, intending to muster a force to retake Norway but he died of an illness before he could return.

Sveinn married Hólmfrƭưr, who was either the daughter or sister of king ƓlĆ”fr of Sweden. They had the daughter Sigrƭưr, who was married to ƁslĆ”kr, son of Erlingr SkjĆ”lgsson. Another daughter, Gunnhildr, was married to Sveinn Úlfsson.

Only one court-poet, Bersi SkƔldtorfuson, is recorded as being in Sveinn's service and very little of his poetry has survived throughout history.

The written sources mentioning Sveinn were all written over 150 years after his death. The Swedish historian Staffan Hellberg in 1972 claimed to be able to show that Sveinn was a fictitious person, and that he had never lived.[3] The debate about this formed part of the wider debate about the value of the 12th and 13th century sagas for 11th century history and earlier, and is an example of the saga skepticism, particularly widespread in Swedish academia. Hellberg's conclusions remain speculative.

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Add your contribution
Related Hubs