Hubbry Logo
search button
Sign in
Unification of theories in physics
Unification of theories in physics
Comunity Hub
History
arrow-down
starMore
arrow-down
bob

Bob

Have a question related to this hub?

bob

Alice

Got something to say related to this hub?
Share it here.

#general is a chat channel to discuss anything related to the hub.
Hubbry Logo
search button
Sign in
Unification of theories in physics
Community hub for the Wikipedia article
logoWikipedian hub
Welcome to the community hub built on top of the Unification of theories in physics Wikipedia article. Here, you can discuss, collect, and organize anything related to Unification of theories in physics. The ...
Add your contribution
Unification of theories in physics

Unification of theories about observable fundamental phenomena of nature is one of the primary goals of physics.[1][2][3] The two great unifications to date are Isaac Newton’s unification of gravity and astronomy, and James Clerk Maxwell’s unification of electromagnetism; the latter has been further unified with the concept of electroweak interaction. This process of "unifying" forces continues today, with the ultimate goal of finding a theory of everything.

Past instances

[edit]

Unification of gravity on Earth with astronomical behaviors

[edit]

The "first great unification" was Isaac Newton's 17th century unification of gravity, in which he brought together the understandings of the observable phenomena of gravity on Earth with the observable laws of behaviour of celestial bodies in space, formulating a fundamentally new, universal mathematical framework that applied to every particle in the universe. This new law accounted for both terrestrial and celestial mechanics, superceding the local, approximate laws of Galileo Galilei and Johannes Kepler with a single, abstract principle that governed the entire cosmos.[2][4][5]

Newton's unification is considered a foundational step in the quest for a unified theory of physics.[6] Physicist Steven Weinberg stated that "It is with Isaac Newton that the modern dream of a final theory really begins".[7]

[edit]

The ancient Chinese people observed that certain rocks such as lodestone and magnetite were attracted to one another by an invisible force. This effect was later called magnetism, which was first rigorously studied in the 17th century. However, prior to ancient Chinese observations of magnetism, the ancient Greeks knew of other objects such as amber, that when rubbed with fur would cause a similar invisible attraction between the two.[8] This was also studied rigorously in the 17th century and came to be called electricity. Thus, physics had come to understand two observations of nature in terms of some root cause (electricity and magnetism). However, work in the 19th century revealed that these two forces were just two different aspects of one force – electromagnetism.

The "second great unification" was James Clerk Maxwell's 19th century unification of electromagnetism. It brought together the understandings of the observable phenomena of magnetism, electricity and light (and more broadly, the spectrum of electromagnetic radiation).[9]

This was followed in the 20th century by Albert Einstein's unification of the description of space and time into an inseparable continuum, and of mass and energy through his theory of special relativity.[9]

Alignment of quantum mechanics with special relativity

[edit]

Later, Paul Dirac developed quantum field theory, placing quantum mechanics within the framework of special relativity.[10]

Unification of electromagnetic and weak interactions

[edit]

A relatively recent unification is of electromagnetism and the weak interaction, which are now considered to be manifestations of the electroweak interaction. This resulted in significant predictions such as the existence of the W and Z bosons, which were subsequently borne out.

Prospective instances

[edit]

Unification of the remaining fundamental interactions

[edit]

Attempts to "unify" the known fundamental interactions continues today, with the goal of finding a theory of everything, which remains perhaps the most prominent of the unsolved problems in physics. There remain four fundamental forces which have not been decisively unified: the gravitational and electromagnetic interactions, which produce significant long-range forces whose effects can be seen directly in everyday life, and the strong and weak interactions, which produce forces at subatomic distances and govern nuclear interactions. Electromagnetism and the weak interactions are widely considered to be two aspects of the electroweak interaction. Attempts to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity into a single theory of quantum gravity, a program ongoing for over half a century, have not yet been decisively resolved; current leading candidates are M-theory, superstring theory and loop quantum gravity.[2]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Weinberg, S. (1993). Dreams of a Final Theory: The Search for the Fundamental Laws of Nature. Hutchinson Radius. ISBN 978-0-09-177395-3.
  2. ^ a b c "Unification theories and a theory of everything". AccessScience. 2014. doi:10.1036/1097-8542.BR0814141. Retrieved 2024-07-27.
  3. ^ Nitesh Soni (2013), Unification of forces, Symmetry Magazine
  4. ^ Klaus Mainzer (2 December 2013). Symmetries of Nature: A Handbook for Philosophy of Nature and Science. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 8–. ISBN 978-3-11-088693-1.
  5. ^ Rowlands, Peter (2017). Newton and the Great World System. World Scientific Publishing. pp. 15, 22, 154. doi:10.1142/q0108. ISBN 978-1-78634-372-7.
  6. ^ Rowlands, Peter (2017). Newton and Modern Physics. World Scientific Publishing. p. 21. ISBN 978-1-78634-332-1.
  7. ^ Weinberg, Steven (1994). Dreams of a Final Theory: The Scientist's Search for the Ultimate Laws of Nature. New York: Vintage Books. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-679-74408-5.
  8. ^ Stewart, J. (2001). Intermediate Electromagnetic Theory. World Scientific. p. 50. ISBN 978-981-02-4471-2.
  9. ^ a b Unification theories and a theory of everything (Report). McGraw-Hill Education. 2014. doi:10.1036/1097-8542.br0814141.
  10. ^ Bhaumik, Mani L. (2022). "How Dirac's Seminal Contributions Pave the Way for Comprehending Nature's Deeper Designs". Quanta. 8 (1): 88–100. arXiv:2209.03937. doi:10.12743/quanta.v8i1.96. S2CID 212835814.

Further reading

[edit]