Hubbry Logo
2011 Canadian census2011 Canadian censusMain
Open search
2011 Canadian census
Community hub
2011 Canadian census
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
2011 Canadian census
2011 Canadian census
2011 Canadian census
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
2011 Canadian census
← 2006 May 10, 2011 2016 →
General information
CountryCanada
Results
Total population33,476,688 (Increase 5.9%)
Most populous province/territoryOntario (12,851,821)
Least populous province/territoryNunavut (31,906)

The 2011 Canadian census was a detailed enumeration of the Canadian population on May 10, 2011. Statistics Canada, an agency of the Canadian government, conducts a nationwide census every five years. In 2011, it consisted of a mandatory short form census questionnaire and an inaugural National Household Survey (NHS),[1][2] a voluntary survey which replaced the mandatory long form census questionnaire; this substitution was the focus of much controversy. Completion of the (short form) census is mandatory for all Canadians, and those who do not complete it may face penalties ranging from fines to prison sentences.[3]

The Statistics Act mandates a Senate and/or House of Commons (joint) committee review of the opt-in clause (for the release of one's census records after 92 years) by 2014.[4]

The 2011 census was the fifteenth decennial census and, like other censuses, was required by section 8 of the Constitution Act, 1867.[5] As with other decennial censuses, the data was used to adjust federal electoral district boundaries.[6]

As of August 24, 2011, Canada's overall collection response rate was 98.1%,[7] up over a percentage point from 96.5% in the 2006 census.[8] Ontario and Prince Edward Island each held the highest response rate at 98.3%, while Nunavut held the lowest response rate at 92.7%.[7]

In an article in the New York Times in August 2015, journalist Stephen Marche argued that by ending the mandatory long-form census in 2011, the federal government "stripped Canada of its capacity to gather information about itself" in the "age of information." Nearly 500 organizations in Canada, including the Canadian Medical Association, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, the Canadian Federation of Students, and the Canadian Catholic Council of Bishops protested the decision to replace the long form census in 2011 with a shorter version.[9][10][11]

Questionnaire revision

[edit]

Short form

[edit]

The original schedule of the short-form questions for the 2011 Census of Population was published in the Canada Gazette, Part I on August 21, 2010.[12] The 2011 census consisted of the same eight questions that appeared on the 2006 census short-form questionnaire, with the addition of two questions on language.[13] The federal Minister of Industry Tony Clement's announcement that questions about language would appear on the mandatory short-form census came in response to a lawsuit brought by the Federation of Francophone and Acadian Communities, which claimed that the voluntary status of the long-form census would impact language-related government services.[12]

In addition to possible questions on activity limitation,[14] various organizations called for the following changes to the 2011 census:

  • Adding "Aboriginal identifier" to the short form (already found on the long form).[15]
  • Relationship of same-sex married couples.[16]
  • Place of work and transportation-related questions.[17]
  • Food security questions.[18]

National Household Survey

[edit]

The National Household Survey (NHS) began within four weeks of the May 2011 census and included approximately 4.5 million households.[19] The information collected by the NHS was intended to replace the data from the previous long-form census questionnaire.

Various industry professionals indicated that the data collected by the NHS is not comparable with the data previously collected by the long form questionnaire.[20] Many of the same professionals indicated that the data gathered by a voluntary survey would not be of the same quality as the previous mandatory long form.[21]

Voluntary long-form survey controversy

[edit]

Ahead of the 2011 census, the Conservative government announced that the long-form questionnaire would no longer be mandatory. This decision was made by the June 17, 2010 Order in Council, created by the Minister of Industry, defining the questions for the 2011 census as including only the short-form questions. This was published in the Canada Gazette on June 26, 2010;[22] however, a news release was not issued by Minister of Industry Tony Clement until July 13, 2010. This release stated in part "The government will retain the mandatory short form that will collect basic demographic information. To meet the need for additional information, and to respect the privacy wishes of Canadians, the government has introduced the voluntary National Household Survey."[23] On July 30, 2010, Statistics Canada published a description of the National Household Survey, intended to be sent to about 4.5 million households. Industry minister Tony Clement stated that the change to voluntary forms was made because of privacy-related complaints, though he acknowledged that the decision was made without consulting organizations and governments that work closely with Statistics Canada. Clement had previously said that this change was made on the advice of Statistics Canada.[24]

The move was criticized by a number of organizations and individuals and was the subject of some satirical articles.[25] Ivan Fellegi, the former Chief Statistician of Canada, originally appointed in 1985 by the Progressive Conservative government of Brian Mulroney, said that he would have quit his job if the government had taken this change during his tenure. He claims that those who are most vulnerable (such as the poor, new immigrants, and Aboriginal peoples) are least likely to respond to a voluntary form, which weakens information about those demographic groups.[26] Munir Sheikh, Fellegi's successor as Chief Statistician appointed by Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper on February 15, 2008,[27] resigned on July 21, 2010, in protest of the Conservative government's change in policy.[28] In a public letter, Sheikh wrote that he could not legally comment on what advice he had given the government regarding the census, but he did comment against the government's decision, writing:

I want to take this opportunity to comment on a technical statistical issue which has become the subject of media discussion. This relates to the question of whether a voluntary survey can become a substitute for a mandatory census. It cannot.[29]

The National Citizens Coalition and the Fraser Institute supported the change.[30]

There were groups against the change from all parts of the political spectrum, and including the Federation of Canadian Municipalities; Atlantic Provinces Economic Council; City of Toronto government; National Statistics Council;[31] Canadian Jewish Congress; Evangelical Fellowship of Canada;[32] Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops;[33] Canadian Medical Association;[34] Statistical Society of Canada; the American Statistical Association;[35] Registered Nurses Association of Ontario; Canadian Conference of the Arts; and the governments of Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, and Manitoba.[36]

On July 19, 2010, representatives from several institutions signed a letter expressing their disapproval of the change and their desire to speak to Clement to find another solution. The organizations represented were:

A House of Commons industry committee special hearing on July 27, 2010, heard that during the previous census, out of approximately 12 million forms, 166 complaints were known to be received directly or indirectly.[33] In answer to Clement's claim that those who do not fill out the census risk jail time, Jack Layton, leader of the national New Democratic Party, noted that in the entire history of the census, the government had not prosecuted and jailed a single person for failing to complete the census, and pointed out that the threat could be removed entirely by amending the legislation so that incarceration is no longer a penalty for refusal to complete the census.[37] In response, the government announced plans to introduce legislation to remove the threat of jail time for anyone refusing to fill out any mandatory government surveys.[38]

Some groups have argued that the decision was motivated by a wish to destroy a useful tool for social advocacy, by making it harder to identify and count disadvantaged groups.[39] However, the Conservative government maintains that its reasoning for the cancellation is that they do not believe it is appropriate to force Canadians to divulge detailed personal information under threat of prosecution.[40]

On October 20, 2010, Statistics Canada predicted that a voluntary long-form would result in a decline of total respondents from 94% to 50%. Consequently, they expect a "substantial risk of non-response bias" and plan to "[adapt their] data collection and other procedures to mitigate as much as possible against these risks." The response rate also led them to predict an increased risk of sampling errors, because only 16% of the Canadian population would be surveyed, as opposed to 19% under a mandatory long-form similar to the one in 2006.[41] The government announced in August 2010 that it would spend$30 million on a campaign aimed at increasing the response rate to the voluntary form, but information released by Statistics Canada in December 2010 revealed that half of this money would be required for tasks unrelated to the promotional campaign.[42]

Criticism of the National Household Survey re-emerged in 2013 following the release of the first set of results from the survey.[43][44]

Reforms since 2011

[edit]

Private member's bill

[edit]

In September 2014, Liberal MP Ted Hsu introduced private member's bill "Bill C-626, An Act to amend the Statistics Act" with the intention of appointing a Chief Statistician and reinstatement of the long-form census in Canada. Despite wide support[45] as often happens with private bills, this failed (at Second Reading), in February 2015.[46]

2016 amendments

[edit]

Following the election of the liberal government of Justin Trudeau, the Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development introduced in the House of Commons Bill C-36, An Act to Amend the Statistics Act on December 7, 2016. The amendments were passed by Royal Assent on December 13, 2017. The Government of Canada press release stated that the amendments were made to the Statistics Act to "ensure that decisions on statistical matters are transparent and are based on professional considerations."[47]

Main article: Statistics Act

2015 reinstatement of Mandatory Long Form Census

[edit]

One day after its election in November 2015, the new Liberal government reinstated the mandatory census long form [48] and it was used in the 2016 census.[49]

Data releases

[edit]

Population and dwellings

[edit]
Rank Province or territory Population as of
2011 census 		Population as of
2006 census 		Change Percent
change
1 Ontario 12,851,821 12,160,282 691,539 Increase 5.7 Increase
2 Quebec 7,903,001 7,546,131 356,870 Increase 4.7 Increase
3 British Columbia 4,400,057 4,113,487 286,570 Increase 7.0 Increase
4 Alberta 3,645,257 3,290,350 354,907 Increase 10.8 Increase
5 Manitoba 1,208,268 1,148,401 59,867 Increase 5.2 Increase
6 Saskatchewan 1,033,381 968,157 65,224 Increase 6.7 Increase
7 Nova Scotia 921,727 913,462 8,265 Increase 0.9 Increase
8 New Brunswick 751,171 729,997 21,174 Increase 2.9 Increase
9 Newfoundland and Labrador 514,536 505,469 9,067 Increase 1.8 Increase
10 Prince Edward Island 140,204 135,851 4,353 Increase 3.2 Increase
11 Northwest Territories 41,462 41,464 −2 Decrease 0.0 Decrease
12 Yukon 33,897 30,372 3,525 Increase 11.6 Increase
13 Nunavut 31,906 29,474 2,432 Increase 8.3 Increase
Canada 33,476,688 31,612,897 1,863,791 Increase 5.9 Increase

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

2011 Canadian census

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The 2011 Canadian census, formally the Census of Population conducted by on May 10, 2011, enumerated a total of 33,476,688 residents, marking a 5.9 percent increase from the 2006 census and the highest population growth rate among countries at the time. This decennial exercise, part of the broader 2011 Census Program, utilized a mandatory short-form sent to every to capture basic demographic such as age, , and type, achieving a national response rate of 98.1 percent, the highest in Canadian census history. Complementing this was the voluntary National Household Survey (NHS), which supplanted the prior mandatory long-form and gathered detailed information on topics including income, education, and ethnocultural origins from a sampled subset of . The shift to a voluntary NHS, implemented by the Conservative under to mitigate perceived and intrusions associated with mandatory detailed questioning, provoked intense . Proponents viewed it as respecting individual liberty, while critics, including statisticians and policymakers, contended that the resulting weighted response rate of 77.2 percent (collection response rate of 68.6%)—substantially below the 93.8% of the 2006 mandatory long-form—compromised data accuracy, introduced non-response bias, and hindered reliable trend analysis for resource allocation and policy-making. Despite these challenges, the census yielded critical insights into Canada's evolving demographics, highlighting sustained immigration-driven growth, urban concentration in census metropolitan areas, and shifts in family structures.

Background and Preparatory Changes

Historical Context of Canadian Censuses

The decennial of Canada's population is constitutionally mandated under Section 8 of the , which requires a general enumeration in the year and every tenth year thereafter to inform parliamentary representation and resource allocation. The inaugural national occurred on April 2, , under the Census Act of 1870, enumerating approximately 3.7 million individuals through door-to-door canvassing and full population coverage for basic demographic data. Subsequent censuses adhered to this schedule, evolving in scope and methodology while maintaining the statutory obligation for comprehensive data collection to support federal governance. Prior to 1971, Canadian censuses relied predominantly on full enumeration via enumerator visits, capturing essential variables such as age, sex, occupation, and birthplace for the entire population. The 1971 Census marked a pivotal methodological shift, introducing a mandatory short-form for all households to gather core demographic information, complemented by a sampled long-form (approximately one-third of households) for detailed socio-economic data, facilitated by mail-out/mail-back procedures to enhance efficiency amid growing population size. Compliance remained compulsory under the governing legislation, with non-response penalties including fines up to $500 as stipulated in the Statistics Act, ensuring high participation and data reliability for and . This hybrid approach of universal short-form and sampled long-form persisted through subsequent cycles, balancing comprehensiveness with resource constraints while upholding empirical continuity. The 2006 Census exemplified this framework's effectiveness, achieving a 93.8% response rate for the long-form questionnaire among selected households, which supported robust estimates of variables like , , and . These benchmarks underscored the system's capacity for accurate, representative data prior to modifications in the 2011 iteration.

Questionnaire Revisions for 2011

The short-form questionnaire for the 2011 Census retained the eight core questions from the 2006 short form, which covered basic demographic details including name, , date of birth, , relationship to the household reference person, and language-related items, while adding two new questions on language use to address evolving linguistic diversity: Question 7 on the language spoken most often at home or languages spoken regularly, and Question 8 on knowledge of official and non-official languages. Modifications to existing questions enhanced precision and respondent comprehension, such as integrating reported age with date of birth in Question 3 to reduce inconsistencies and updating response categories in Question 6 on household relationships for better alignment with contemporary family structures. These updates aimed to streamline data capture without increasing overall burden, as validated through pre-census evaluations. The planned long-form questionnaire, subsequently adapted for the National Household Survey, preserved essential socio-economic topics such as , , , and mobility from prior censuses but incorporated revisions to eliminate redundancies, refine question wording for clarity, and incorporate policy-driven needs like improved ethnic origin and Aboriginal identity capture. Changes were informed by legislative requirements, program demands, and user consultations that identified opportunities for efficiency, such as consolidating overlapping mobility and commuting queries to minimize repetition while maintaining comparability with historical data. Development involved rigorous testing from 2008 to 2010: the 2008 Content Test surveyed 26,000 dwellings to assess question modifications for both forms; the 2009 Census Test expanded to 110,000 dwellings, evaluating procedural impacts and wave-based collection; and 2010 qualitative interviews focused on the new language questions to ensure response accuracy. Over 1,200 stakeholder comments from more than 150 organizations, gathered via in-person sessions and online campaigns starting in spring 2007, shaped these revisions, prioritizing empirical validation over untested assumptions to balance comprehensive coverage with reduced respondent fatigue. The final content was approved following publication in the Canada Gazette on August 21, 2010.

Government Decision on Survey Format

In June 2010, Industry Minister announced that the mandatory long-form questionnaire, previously sent to about one in five households every five years, would be discontinued for the 2011 and replaced by the voluntary National Household Survey (NHS). This policy shift under the Conservative government aimed to address public complaints about the intrusive nature of detailed personal questions on topics such as income, education, and commuting patterns. The 's rationale centered on protecting individual privacy and avoiding coercive measures, noting that prior iterations of the mandatory long form had elicited concerns from who viewed compelled disclosure of sensitive as an unwarranted intrusion. Officials highlighted ethical objections to enforcing compliance through potential fines or legal penalties, arguing that such penalties undermined voluntary participation and public trust in statistical agencies. To maintain essential data collection, the short-form census—covering basic demographics like name, age, sex, , and —was kept mandatory for all households, preserving the accuracy of foundational counts and dwelling statistics. The NHS, distributed to approximately one in three households shortly after the short-form , sought to elicit the same detailed socioeconomic data without penalties for non-response, with expectations of lower administrative costs due to reduced follow-up enforcement efforts.

Implementation Details

Mandatory Short-Form Census

The mandatory short-form questionnaire for the 2011 Census of Population was sent to every private dwelling in Canada, serving as the universal tool for basic enumeration on the reference date of May 10, 2011. It retained the core eight questions from the 2006 short-form—covering name, sex, date of birth or age, marital status, full address, and relationship to household members—while adding two language-related questions on mother tongue and knowledge of official languages, for a total of ten questions focused on essential demographic identifiers including citizenship status. Questionnaires were primarily delivered by mail, with households encouraged to respond online via a secure access code printed on the form; non-response prompted interviewer visits to ensure comprehensive coverage. This approach yielded a national response rate of 98.1% for the short-form, surpassing the 96.5% achieved in and marking the highest in Canadian census history, which minimized imputation needs and supported precise benchmarking. The resulting count enumerated a total of 33,476,688 residents, providing a robust foundation for deriving intercensal growth rates and geographic distributions without reliance on sampling adjustments. The short-form data also enabled accurate tallies of housing units, identifying 13,320,614 private dwellings occupied by usual residents, which equated to the number of private households and informed baseline dwelling counts for subsequent statistical modeling. This high-compliance mechanism underscored the short-form's role as the reliable anchor for outputs, distinct from supplementary surveys and unaffected by voluntary participation variability.

Voluntary National Household Survey

The National Household Survey (NHS) was implemented in as a voluntary alternative to the mandatory long-form , with the objective of gathering detailed socio-economic while respecting respondents' by eliminating legal penalties for non-response. Designed to cover a broader base of households than the previous long-form's 20% sample, the NHS targeted approximately 4.5 million private dwellings, representing about 30% of Canada's total, to enhance granularity through increased voluntary engagement rather than compulsion. This expanded sampling aimed to mitigate potential gaps from opt-outs by leveraging a larger initial pool, with stratification by and dwelling type to ensure representation across provinces, territories, and urban-rural areas. The NHS questionnaire consisted of 64 questions, structured to collect comprehensive information on demographics, family and household composition, activity limitations, Indigenous identity, language, and ethnocultural characteristics, , labor market activities, , and . These topics were selected to align with prior long-form content, enabling continuity in statistical series, while the form was optimized for self-completion via paper, online, or telephone modes to facilitate and encourage participation. Estimated completion time ranged from 25 to 35 minutes, with questions phrased to minimize burden and maximize clarity, drawing from pre-tested revisions informed by user consultations. To promote voluntary compliance without fines or mandatory enforcement, the survey incorporated non-coercive strategies, including initial mailed invitations with secure access codes for submission, followed by reminder letters and targeted follow-up contacts via or phone for non-respondents. Public awareness campaigns emphasized the survey's importance for policy and resource allocation, framing participation as a civic contribution to national data needs, with design elements like multilingual support and assistance hotlines intended to broaden accessibility across diverse populations. This approach reflected an intent to foster higher intrinsic motivation for response, compensating for the absence of penalties through procedural efficiencies and respondent-friendly interfaces.

Data Collection Process and Response Rates

The 2011 Canadian census enumeration commenced on May 10, 2011, designated as Census Day, with data collection extending through follow-up efforts until the end of July. Statistics Canada employed three primary delivery methods: mail-out to approximately 60% of dwellings, where households first received invitations to complete questionnaires online via a secure portal before paper forms were mailed if needed; list/leave for 20% of dwellings, involving enumerators dropping off paper questionnaires; and direct interviews for the remaining 20%, primarily in remote areas, northern territories, and Indian reserves. Households could submit responses either digitally or by mail, supported by a toll-free Census Help Line for assistance, while approximately 30,000 enumerators conducted non-response follow-ups, including revisit collections and special enumerations for collective dwellings and transient populations. The mandatory short-form census questionnaire, covering basic demographic and dwelling information for all households, achieved a response rate exceeding 98%, enabling near-complete coverage with minimal imputation required for . In contrast, the voluntary National Household Survey (NHS), distributed to about one-third of Canadian households (roughly 4.5 million) starting in May , relied on similar and paper options but without legal compulsion, resulting in an unweighted response rate of 68.6%. The NHS exhibited a global non-response rate of 26.1%, incorporating both complete non-responses and partial item non-responses necessitating imputation, markedly higher than the 2006 census long-form's overall response rate of approximately 94%. This disparity underscored greater reliance on statistical adjustments for the NHS, while the short-form's high participation minimized such interventions across the census program.

Debates on Mandatory vs. Voluntary Approaches

Rationales for Shifting to Voluntary Format

The Canadian government, under Industry Minister , justified the shift to a voluntary National Household Survey (NHS) for the 2011 census primarily on grounds of protecting individual and avoiding coercive enforcement mechanisms. Officials argued that the mandatory long-form , which carried potential fines of up to $500 for non-compliance, represented an unnecessary intrusion into personal affairs, particularly for questions on sensitive topics such as , , and family structure. Clement emphasized that even a single citizen's objection to compelled disclosure warranted change, framing mandatory participation as incompatible with principles of intervention in private matters. This stance positioned as a fundamental right not to be subordinated to statistical imperatives absent compelling evidence of harm from non-coercion. Proponents anticipated that a voluntary format would sidestep ethical concerns over penalizing non-respondents, noting the absence of widespread prior complaints to justify continued compulsion. Canada's Privacy Commissioner reported only three valid complaints related to census intrusiveness across the previous two cycles ( and ), suggesting minimal empirical basis for claims of pervasive privacy violations under the mandatory system. By eliminating fines and jail threats—historically rare but symbolically coercive—the government sought to align data collection with voluntary consent, reducing the of state-enforced revelation of while preserving core functions through the short-form mandatory questionnaire. To address potential data gaps from lower response rates, the rationale included expanding the NHS sample to approximately 4.5 million households—over three times the 1 in 5 targeted by the prior long-form—enabling statistical imputation and weighting techniques to approximate mandatory outcomes. This approach drew on precedents from voluntary surveys conducted by , such as the Canadian Community Health Survey, which demonstrated viable utility for policy planning despite response rates around 60-70%, through rigorous non-response bias corrections. Officials projected comparable accuracy at reduced enforcement costs, prioritizing liberty over maximal compliance without substantiated evidence that coercion uniquely ensured superior .

Empirical Concerns Over Data Quality and Bias

The National Household Survey (NHS) of 2011 recorded a response rate of 68.3% for occupied private dwellings, compared to 94% for the 2006 long-form census, elevating the potential for unit non-response across variables. Linked-file of 2006 and 2011 census data by revealed indicators of such , particularly affecting estimates for specific demographic subgroups and geographic locales. Non-response was disproportionately higher among low-income households, recent immigrants, and populations, as these groups exhibited lower participation in voluntary surveys relative to higher-socioeconomic-status respondents. This pattern contributed to upward biases in income distributions, with median income estimates showing anomalies—such as unexpectedly elevated figures—in urban centers like and , where concentrations of affected groups are highest and underrepresentation skewed aggregates. Data suppression practices further underscored quality limitations, with estimates withheld for approximately 1,100 small communities (census subdivisions) due to global non-response rates (GNR) exceeding 50%, a threshold signaling unreliability; this contrasted with only about 200 such suppressions in 2006. Such omissions reduced available for localized policy analysis, particularly in rural and remote areas prone to lower response. Imputation rates also rose markedly, averaging twice the 2006 levels for labour force variables (e.g., from baseline rates around 2-5% to 4-10%) and increasing by about 3 percentage points for education metrics, reflecting greater reliance on modeled substitutions amid incomplete responses. These elevations, while necessary for estimate production, introduced additional uncertainty, potentially undermining precision in causal inferences drawn from socio-economic trends. The Conservative government's announcement on June 29, 2010, to eliminate the mandatory long-form census in favor of a voluntary National Household Survey prompted immediate backlash from opposition parties, which argued the change would compromise data reliability essential for policymaking. Chief Statistician Munir Sheikh resigned on July 21, 2010, stating in his public letter that voluntary surveys inherently risk lower response rates and non-response bias, failing to match the coverage and quality of mandatory methods used historically. The National Statistics Council expressed regret over the resignation, underscoring internal concerns about maintaining statistical integrity. Academics, economists, and business analysts joined the criticism, with a survey revealing that more than 75 percent of economists deemed the policy unwise due to anticipated disruptions in economic modeling and resource allocation. Some provinces, along with hundreds of municipalities and organizations, petitioned against the shift, citing potential interruptions to funding formulas and urban planning reliant on precise census data. Business stakeholders warned that diminished data granularity would hinder market analysis and investment decisions, amplifying calls for reversal amid fears of biased or incomplete socioeconomic insights. Despite threats of litigation, no legal challenges succeeded in overturning the decision. A Federal Court ruling on October 6, 2010, dismissed a by a francophone , holding that the executive branch held discretion over absent statutory violations. A subsequent application in December 2010 by concerned parties similarly failed, with courts affirming the government's authority to adjust survey formats for perceived improvements, even as critics contested the empirical basis for such gains. Post-decision disclosures revealed had internally advised against the voluntary approach, citing elevated risks of undercoverage in vulnerable populations, though ministers overrode these recommendations in pursuit of reduced compulsion. The government maintained its stance, eliminating jail threats for non-compliance to address prior complaints, but resistance from stakeholders fueled ongoing parliamentary debate without altering the 2011 implementation.

Released Data and Analytical Outcomes

Core Population and Dwelling Statistics

The 2011 Census of , conducted via the mandatory short-form , enumerated a national of 33,476,688 as of May 10, 2011, marking a 5.9% increase from the 31,612,897 recorded in the 2006 census. This growth rate exceeded that of the previous intercensal period (5.4% from 2001 to 2006) and positioned as having the highest increase among countries during 2006–2011. Ontario led provincial populations with 12,851,821 residents, followed by Quebec at 7,903,001; these two provinces accounted for over 62% of the national total. Approximately 81% of lived in urban areas defined as census metropolitan areas (CMAs) and census agglomerations (CAs), underscoring significant concentration in larger centres, while the overall stood at 3.7 persons per square kilometre across Canada's land area of 8,965,121.42 . The census identified 14,620,000 total private dwellings, up from previous counts, with 13,320,614 classified as occupied by usual —an increase of 7.0% from 12,435,520 in 2006. Among occupied private dwellings, single-detached houses predominated, reflecting preferences for low-density in suburban and rural settings.

Socio-Economic Insights from NHS

The National Household Survey (NHS) yielded income statistics indicating a total household income of $68,800 in 2010, derived from respondent data that flagged for potential non-response bias favoring higher-income households, as lower-response groups such as recent immigrants and low earners were underrepresented. This upward skew was attributed to the voluntary format's 27.7% overall response rate, which disproportionately captured responses from more affluent and established demographics. Education attainment data from the NHS showed that approximately 51% of aged 25 and over held a postsecondary certificate, , or degree, reflecting ongoing gains in but interpreted cautiously due to underrepresentation of non-respondents from and immigrant communities who often exhibit varying educational profiles. Labour force participation stood at 64.5%, with an rate of 7.8%, highlighting a resilient amid post-recession recovery, though caveats apply for potential overestimation of stability given response patterns among transient or marginalized workers. Ethnocultural insights revealed that 19.1% of the population identified as , a figure driven primarily by , with recent arrivals (2006–2011) comprising over 78% and contributing disproportionately to urban diversity growth. These patterns underscored 's role in demographic expansion, particularly in major metros like and , where shares exceeded 40%, though data reliability was tempered by lower response rates in high-, linguistically diverse households.

Identified Limitations and Suppression Practices

Statistics Canada applied suppression criteria to National Household Survey (NHS) estimates deemed unreliable due to high sampling variability, primarily using coefficients of variation (CVs) exceeding 33.3%, which rendered data inadequate for release under agency quality guidelines. This threshold, part of broader non-sampling error assessments, particularly impacted small-area data where global non-response rates reached or exceeded 50%, leading to non-publication of estimates. For income variables, additional rules suppressed data in geographic areas with populations under 250 or fewer than 10 individuals reporting income, limiting granular socioeconomic analysis at the census subdivision level. Mobility data, including residence changes over one and five years, faced similar suppressions in low-response locales, exacerbating gaps in tracking patterns. Compared to the mandatory long-form , NHS estimates exhibited reduced precision, with CVs indicating wider confidence intervals for key metrics; for instance, low- thresholds in urban areas like the CMA showed biases toward underestimation (-4.4%) and intervals of ±0.5% versus ±0.4% previously. Poverty-related indicators, derived from distributions, suffered from heightened variability in small domains, while and mobility patterns displayed estimation errors up to -5.9% for recent movers in simulated benchmarks, reflecting the voluntary survey's 50% response rate against the prior 94%. These discrepancies arose from increased non-response bias and methodological shifts, resulting in fewer releasable small-area statistics—3,439 census subdivisions for NHS versus broader coverage in . Agency documentation urged users to exercise caution in longitudinal analyses, noting that NHS-to-census transitions introduced incomparability risks from differing response dynamics and weighting adjustments, potentially skewing trend interpretations without auxiliary validation. CV tables were provided for select variables to enable independent reliability checks, emphasizing transparency amid acknowledged constraints on precision for or sparse populations.

Post-2011 Reforms and Broader Implications

Early Adjustments and Private Initiatives

In response to the transition to the voluntary National Household Survey (NHS) for the census, developed enhanced weighting methodologies to address non-response bias and align NHS estimates with benchmarks from the mandatory short-form census. The agency's Sampling and Weighting outlined a multi-stage process, including initial sampling weights adjusted for non-response and final calibration to population counts by age, , and geography, aiming to minimize discrepancies at national and provincial levels. Despite these efforts, the overall NHS response rate stood at 77.3%, substantially lower than the 93.5% for the 2006 mandatory long-form, leading to acknowledged residual biases particularly in smaller domains where suppression of unreliable data was necessary. Weighting achieved partial success in stabilizing national aggregates, such as income and education metrics, but experts noted limitations in correcting for behavioral non-response differences among underrepresented groups. Legislative attempts to reverse the voluntary format emerged promptly but failed to gain traction. In 2010, Liberal MPs introduced private member's bills to amend the Statistics Act, embedding the long-form census as mandatory while eliminating jail penalties to balance concerns, yet these initiatives did not advance amid Conservative majority opposition. Subsequent efforts, including Bill C-626 tabled in 2014 by Liberal MP , sought to reinstate the mandatory long-form and protect the Chief Statistician's independence but were defeated at second reading in the on February 3, 2015. These defeats highlighted partisan divides, with proponents arguing for data reliability essential to , while critics prioritized respondent over compulsory participation. Provinces and private entities initiated supplementary data collection to compensate for NHS gaps, particularly in localized socio-economic analysis. For instance, leveraged NHS data alongside provincial administrative records to assess housing needs, identifying increases in severe core housing need in provinces like from 2006 to 2011, though custom provincial surveys were deployed for granular insights into shelter costs and shortfalls. , for example, produced targeted NHS-derived highlights supplemented by regional labor force queries to inform , reflecting adaptive strategies amid federal data volatility. Private research organizations, such as university-affiliated centers, applied bespoke imputation models to NHS outputs, enhancing usability for niche applications like ethnic origin trends, though these remained constrained by underlying voluntary response limitations.

2015 Reinstatement of Mandatory Long-Form

Following the October 19, 2015, federal election victory of the Liberal Party under , the new government announced on November 5, 2015, the reinstatement of the mandatory long-form for the 2016 , reversing the Conservative administration's 2010 decision to adopt a voluntary National Household Survey (NHS). stated that this change aligned with commitments to evidence-based policymaking, emphasizing the need for comprehensive data to inform government decisions. The policy shift targeted one in four households (approximately 25% sample coverage), restoring the pre-2011 format while incorporating online submission options to modernize collection. The reinstatement was explicitly linked to perceived deficiencies in the 2011 NHS, which achieved a national response rate of about 69.3%, resulting in higher sampling variability, increased data suppression in small geographic areas, and challenges in tracking vulnerable populations compared to prior mandatory censuses exceeding 90% participation. Bains highlighted that voluntary participation had compromised data reliability for applications in , , and economic analysis, prompting the return to compulsion with penalties including fines up to $500 for non-response and $1,000 for providing false information, enforceable under the Statistics Act. Implementation in 2016 demonstrated elevated compliance, with the long-form achieving a 97.8% response rate—Statistics Canada's highest recorded—substantiating the mandatory mechanism's effectiveness in minimizing non-response bias relative to the 2011 voluntary approach. Self-enumeration reached nearly 90% of households, aided by digital tools, though follow-up collections addressed the remaining cases. This outcome provided a benchmark for subsequent assessments, confirming reduced imputation needs and variance in estimates.

Long-Term Effects on Policy and Research

The transition to a voluntary long-form census in 2011, resulting in the National Household Survey (NHS) with a 69.3% response rate, created data gaps and suppression in approximately 25% of dissemination areas, complicating evidence-based policymaking in immigration where detailed profiles of immigrant integration and settlement patterns were essential for targeting integration programs and labor market assessments. In urban planning, the underrepresentation of vulnerable populations such as immigrants and low-income households due to non-response bias hindered precise resource allocation for infrastructure, housing, and social services at municipal levels, as small-area data reliability declined. Researchers responded to these gaps by increasingly integrating NHS outputs with administrative records, including tax files and registers, to impute non-responses and enhance coverage in localized areas, though this hybrid perpetuated challenges in longitudinal comparability with pre-2011 mandatory benchmarks, disrupting trend analyses in socio-economic disparities and family structures. The resulting datasets supported continued national-level studies but reduced Canada's utility in international comparisons, such as through the Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS), where non-comparable series limited cross-national insights on . This episode highlighted inherent trade-offs between respondent privacy gains from reduced intrusiveness and the precision of population estimates, with administrative supplements mitigating but not eliminating biases; despite widespread critiques of reliability, no in occurred, as core functions persisted through adapted methods without halting essential policy or research operations.

References

  1. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/98-310-x/98-310-x2011001-eng.cfm
  2. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/index-eng.cfm
  3. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/ref/about-apropos/nhs-enm_r012.cfm?Lang=E
  4. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/section-8.html
  5. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2021/ref/98-304/2021001/app-ann1-1-eng.cfm
  6. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/ref/about-apropos/history-histoire-eng.cfm
  7. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/census/census-engagement/about/brief-history
  8. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2021/ref/98-306/2021001/app-annB-eng.cfm
  9. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/ref/98-304/chap10-eng.cfm
  10. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2006/ref/dict/overview-apercu/pop1-eng.cfm
  11. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/ref/about-apropos/questions-eng.cfm
  12. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/ref/overview-apercu/pop4-eng.cfm
  13. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/consultation/ContentGuide-GuideContenu/index-eng.cfm
  14. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/consultation/ContentReport-RapportContenu/index-eng.cfm
  15. https://www.canada.ca/en/news/archive/2010/07/statement-2011-census.html
  16. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2010/07/02/canadian-census-eliminates-the-long-form/
  17. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/ref/reports-rapports/sw-ep/index-eng.cfm
  18. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/ref/overview-apercu/pop6-eng.cfm
  19. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/ref/about-apropos/rates-taux-eng.cfm
  20. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/120208/dq120208a-eng.htm
  21. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/ref/dq-qd/qual-eng.cfm
  22. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/ref/info-eng.cfm
  23. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/ref/nhs-enm_guide/guide_2-eng.cfm
  24. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/ref/nhs-enm_guide/99-001-x2011001-eng.pdf
  25. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/imdb-bmdi/5178-eng.htm
  26. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/ref/about-apropos/col-eng.cfm
  27. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/ref/guides/98-303-x/ch4-eng.cfm
  28. https://tangoanalytics.com/blog/canada-retailers-impacted-long-form-census/
  29. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/fc-rf/reports-rapports/r2_table-tableau_3-eng.cfm
  30. https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/even-one-dissenting-canadian-enough-to-kill-long-form-census-says-clement/article_8aad0a11-a2cd-5bec-bc6f-c6bfc240c08f.html
  31. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/flawed-arguments-for-census-changes/article1212531/
  32. https://worthwhile.typepad.com/worthwhile_canadian_initi/2010/07/clement.html
  33. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/ref/about-apropos/nhs-enm_r005-eng.cfm
  34. https://crdcn.ca/app/uploads/2021/09/NHS_Michalowski.pdf
  35. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/ref/reports-rapports/sw-ep/ch5-eng.cfm
  36. https://www.policyalternatives.ca/wp-content/uploads/attachments/Data%2520and%2520Bias.pdf
  37. https://economica.ca/are-data-from-the-2011-census-reliable/
  38. https://www.wellesleyinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/The-Colour-Coded-Labour-Market-By-The-Numbers.pdf
  39. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canada-s-foreign-born-population-soars-to-6-8-million-1.1308179
  40. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/dp-pd/prof/help-aide/gnr-tgn.cfm?Lang=E
  41. https://manifolddatamining.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/notes_census_NHS.pdf
  42. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2013/statcan/CS99-012-2011-7-eng.pdf
  43. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/ref/guides/99-012-x/99-012-x2011006-eng.cfm
  44. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/ref/guides/99-014-x/99-014-x2011006-eng.cfm
  45. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/tories-scrap-mandatory-long-census-1.888048
  46. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/statscan-head-quits-over-census-dispute-1.866937
  47. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/wsd/News2.aspx
  48. https://www.scribd.com/doc/34720711/National-Statistics-Council-Statement-on-the-Resignation-of-Dr-Sheikh
  49. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/economists-decry-census-move/article1388045/
  50. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/long-form-census-issue-goes-back-to-court-1.949961
  51. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/canada-under-fire-for-changes-at-statistics-agency-idUSN13243844/
  52. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-11488563
  53. https://www.research-live.com/article/news/statscan-recommended-against-census-change-admits-minister/id/4003356
  54. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/no-more-census-concessions-clement-vows-1.917720
  55. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/fogs-spg/Facts-pr-eng.cfm?Lang=eng&GC=35
  56. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/fogs-spg/Facts-pr-eng.cfm?Lang=Eng&GK=PR&GC=24
  57. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/140528/dq140528b-eng.htm
  58. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/ref/guides/98-313-x/98-313-x2011001-eng.cfm
  59. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/global/URLRedirect.cfm?lang=E&ips=99-010-X2011036
  60. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2013/statcan/CS99-010-2011-1-eng.pdf
  61. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/statistical-programs/document/5065_D3_T9_V1-eng.pdf
  62. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/dp-pd/prof/help-aide/aboutdata-aproposdonnees.cfm?Lang=E
  63. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/ref/cv/index.cfm?Lang=E
  64. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/ref/reports-rapports/sw-ep/99-002-x2011001-eng.pdf
  65. http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2013/files/308507_80988.pdf
  66. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/liberals-introduce-mandatory-census-bill/article4327556/
  67. https://openparliament.ca/bills/41-2/C-626/
  68. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/we-havent-forgotten-the-long-form-census/article22819338/
  69. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2017/schl-cmhc/nh18-23/NH18-23-2016-2-eng.pdf
  70. https://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/departments/finance/esi/nhs_highlights.html
  71. https://www.canada.ca/en/innovation-science-economic-development/news/2015/11/restoring-the-long-form-census.html
  72. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-liberal-census-data-1.3305271
  73. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mandatory-census-mail-out-1.3557511
  74. https://globalnews.ca/news/2321547/its-fantastic-data-users-cheer-reinstatement-of-long-form-census/
  75. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/05/canada-new-liberal-government-resurrects-mandatory-census
  76. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/statistics-canada-census-lockheed-martin-1.3975666
  77. https://isi-web.org/sites/default/files/import//proceedings/STS073-the-return-of-the-mandatory-census-long-form-end-of-the-statistical-confidence-crisis-in-canada.pdf
  78. https://utppublishing.com/doi/full/10.3138/cpp.36.3.389
  79. https://www.cpha.ca/sites/default/files/assets/briefs/longformcensus_e.pdf
  80. https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2022-09/D9_Bowlby_ENG.pdf
  81. https://nces.ed.gov/FCSM/pdf/G1_Trepanier_2013FCSM_AC.pdf
  82. https://policyoptions.irpp.org/2010/11/from-compulsory-to-voluntary-long-form-census-what-we-stand-to-lose/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.