Hubbry Logo
search button
Sign in
Microconchida
Microconchida
Comunity Hub
arrow-down
History
arrow-down
starMore
arrow-down
bob

Bob

Have a question related to this hub?

bob

Alice

Got something to say related to this hub?
Share it here.

#general is a chat channel to discuss anything related to the hub.
Hubbry Logo
search button
Sign in
Microconchida
Community hub for the Wikipedia article
logoWikipedian hub
Welcome to the community hub built on top of the Microconchida Wikipedia article. Here, you can discuss, collect, and organize anything related to Microconchida. The purpose of the hub is to connect peopl...
Add your contribution
Microconchida

Microconchida
Temporal range: Upper Ordovician - Middle Jurassic (Taylor and Vinn, 2006)
Palaeoconchus angulatus (Hall, 1861) on a brachiopod from the Middle Devonian (Givetian) of Michigan
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Class: Tentaculita
Order: Microconchida
Weedon 1991
Genera
Helicoconchus elongatus, a microconchid from the Lower Permian of Texas. (See Wilson et al., 2011).
Punctaconchus midfordensis (Richardson, 1907). Bajocian, Clypeus Grit Member, Worgan's Quarry, Gloucestershire, UK.

The order Microconchida is a group of small, spirally-coiled, encrusting fossil "worm" tubes from the class Tentaculita found from the Upper Ordovician to the Middle Jurassic (Bathonian) around the world.[1][2][3][4][5] They have lamellar calcitic shells, usually with pseudopunctae or punctae and a bulb-like origin. Many were long misidentified as the polychaete annelid Spirorbis until studies of shell microstructure and formation showed significant differences.[6] All pre-Cretaceous "Spirorbis" fossils are now known to be microconchids.[6] Their classification at the phylum level is still debated. Most likely they are some form of lophophorate, a group which includes phoronids, bryozoans and brachiopods. Microconchids may be closely related to the other encrusting tentaculitoid tubeworms, such as Anticalyptraea, trypanoporids and cornulitids.[3] Their habitat is more controversial. While there is a consensus that they were present in the seas and in brackish water, there is a debate about their presence in freshwater. Some studies suggested that they colonised freshwater in the Early Devonian,[7][8] whereas others suggest that microconchids never colonised that environment.[9][10] A recent review of the associated fauna failed to find reliable occurrences of microconchids in the Middle Devonian to Early Permian time interval because microconchids seem to co-occur with other signs of marine influence,[11] such as xiphosurans and chondrichthyan egg capsules.[12]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Weedon, M.J. 1991. "Microstructure and affinity of the enigmatic Devonian tubular fossil Trypanopora". Lethaia 24:227-234 doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1991.tb01471.x.
  2. ^ Vinn, O. 2006. "Two new microconchid (Tentaculita Bouček 1964) genera from the Early Palaeozoic of Baltoscandia and England". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie 2006:89-100.
  3. ^ a b Vinn, O. 2010. "Adaptive strategies in the evolution of encrusting tentaculitoid tubeworms". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 292:211–221.
  4. ^ Vinn, O. & Mutvei, H. 2009. "Calcareous tubeworms of the Phanerozoic". Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences 58:286-296.
  5. ^ Zaton, M. & Vinn, O. 2011. "Microconchids and the rise of modern encrusting communities". Lethaia 44:5-7 doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.2010.00258.x
  6. ^ a b Taylor, P.D. & Vinn, O. 2006. "Convergent morphology in small spiral worm tubes ("Spirorbis") and its palaeoenvironmental implications". Journal of the Geological Society, London 163:225-228 doi:10.1144/0016-764905-145.
  7. ^ Zatoń, Michał; Vinn, Olev; Tomescu, Alexandru M. F. (1 November 2012). "Invasion of freshwater and variable marginal marine habitats by microconchid tubeworms – an evolutionary perspective". Geobios. 45 (6): 603–610. doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2011.12.003. ISSN 0016-6995.
  8. ^ Zatoń, Michał; Wilson, Mark A.; Vinn, Olev (1 January 2016). "Comment on the paper of Gierlowski-Kordesch and Cassle "The 'Spirorbis' problem revisited: Sedimentology and biology of microconchids in marine–nonmarine transitions" [Earth-Science Reviews, 148 (2015): 209–227]". Earth-Science Reviews. 152: 198–200. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.11.012. ISSN 0012-8252.
  9. ^ Gierlowski-Kordesch, Elizabeth H.; Cassle, Christopher F. (1 September 2015). "The 'Spirorbis' problem revisited: Sedimentology and biology of microconchids in marine-nonmarine transitions". Earth-Science Reviews. 148: 209–227. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.04.010. ISSN 0012-8252.
  10. ^ Gierlowski-Kordesch, Elizabeth H.; Falcon-Lang, Howard J.; Cassle, Christopher F. (1 January 2016). "Reply to comment on the paper of Gierlowski-Kordesch and Cassle "The 'Spirorbis' problem revisited: Sedimentology and biology of microconchids in marine–nonmarine transitions"". Earth-Science Reviews. 152: 201–204. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.11.011. ISSN 0012-8252.
  11. ^ Laurin, Michel (30 December 2024). "Habitat of early stegocephalians (Chordata, Vertebrata, Sarcopterygii): a little saltier than most paleontologists like?". Fossil Record. 27 (3): 299–332. doi:10.3897/fr.27.123291. ISSN 2193-0074.
  12. ^ Lomax, Dean R.; Robinson, Peter; Cleal, Christopher J.; Bowden, Alistair; Larkin, Nigel R. (2016). "Exceptional preservation of Upper Carboniferous (lower Westphalian) fossils from Edlington, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, UK". Geological Journal. 51 (1): 42–50. doi:10.1002/gj.2602. ISSN 1099-1034.