Hubbry Logo
search button
Sign in
Rayleigh length
Rayleigh length
Comunity Hub
arrow-down
History
arrow-down
starMore
arrow-down
bob

Bob

Have a question related to this hub?

bob

Alice

Got something to say related to this hub?
Share it here.

#general is a chat channel to discuss anything related to the hub.
Hubbry Logo
search button
Sign in
Rayleigh length
Community hub for the Wikipedia article
logoWikipedian hub
Welcome to the community hub built on top of the Rayleigh length Wikipedia article. Here, you can discuss, collect, and organize anything related to Rayleigh length. The purpose of the hub is to connect p...
Add your contribution
Rayleigh length
Gaussian beam width as a function of the axial distance . : beam waist; : confocal parameter; : Rayleigh length; : total angular spread

In optics and especially laser science, the Rayleigh length or Rayleigh range, , is the distance along the propagation direction of a beam from the waist to the place where the area of the cross section is doubled.[1] A related parameter is the confocal parameter, b, which is twice the Rayleigh length.[2] The Rayleigh length is particularly important when beams are modeled as Gaussian beams.

Explanation

[edit]

For a Gaussian beam propagating in free space along the axis with wave number , the Rayleigh length is given by[2]

where is the wavelength (the vacuum wavelength divided by , the index of refraction) and is the beam waist, the radial size of the beam at its narrowest point. This equation and those that follow assume that the waist is not extraordinarily small; .[3]

The radius of the beam at a distance from the waist is[4]

The minimum value of occurs at , by definition. At distance from the beam waist, the beam radius is increased by a factor and the cross sectional area by 2.

[edit]

The total angular spread of a Gaussian beam in radians is related to the Rayleigh length by[1]

The diameter of the beam at its waist (focus spot size) is given by

.

These equations are valid within the limits of the paraxial approximation. For beams with much larger divergence the Gaussian beam model is no longer accurate and a physical optics analysis is required.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Siegman, A. E. (1986). Lasers. University Science Books. pp. 664–669. ISBN 0-935702-11-3.
  2. ^ a b Damask, Jay N. (2004). Polarization Optics in Telecommunications. Springer. pp. 221–223. ISBN 0-387-22493-9.
  3. ^ Siegman (1986) p. 630.
  4. ^ Meschede, Dieter (2007). Optics, Light and Lasers: The Practical Approach to Modern Aspects of Photonics and Laser Physics. Wiley-VCH. pp. 46–48. ISBN 978-3-527-40628-9.