Hubbry Logo
Roger BaconRoger BaconMain
Open search
Roger Bacon
Community hub
Roger Bacon
logo
19 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Roger Bacon
Roger Bacon
Roger Bacon
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Roger Bacon OFM (/ˈbeɪkən/;[3] Latin: Rogerus or Rogerius Baconus, Baconis, also Frater Rogerus; c. 1219/20 – c. 1292), also known by the scholastic accolade Doctor Mirabilis, was a medieval English polymath, philosopher, scientist, theologian and Franciscan friar who placed considerable emphasis on the study of nature through empiricism. Intertwining his Catholic faith with scientific thinking, Roger Bacon is considered one of the greatest polymaths of the medieval period.

Key Information

In the early modern era, he was regarded as a wizard and particularly famed for the story of his mechanical or necromantic brazen head. He is credited as one of the earliest European advocates of the modern scientific method, along with his teacher Robert Grosseteste. Bacon applied the empirical method of Ibn al-Haytham (Alhazen) to observations in texts attributed to Aristotle. Bacon discovered the importance of empirical testing when the results he obtained were different from those that would have been predicted by Aristotle.[4][5]

His linguistic work has been heralded for its early exposition of a universal grammar, and 21st-century re-evaluations emphasise that Bacon was essentially a medieval thinker, with much of his "experimental" knowledge obtained from books in the scholastic tradition.[6] He was, however, partially responsible for a revision of the medieval university curriculum, which saw the addition of optics to the traditional quadrivium.[7]

Bacon's major work, the Opus Majus, was sent to Pope Clement IV in Rome in 1267 upon the pope's request. Although gunpowder was first invented and described in China, Bacon was the first in Europe to record its formula.

Life

[edit]

Roger Bacon was born in Ilchester in Somerset, England, in the early 13th century. His birth is sometimes narrowed down to 1210,[8] 1213 or 1214,[9] 1215[10] or 1220.[11] The only source for his birth date is a statement from his 1267 Opus Tertium that "forty years have passed since I first learned the Alphabetum".[12] The latest dates assume this referred to the alphabet itself, but elsewhere in the Opus Tertium it is clear that Bacon uses the term to refer to rudimentary studies, the trivium or quadrivium that formed the medieval curriculum.[13] His family appears to have been well off.[14]

Bacon studied at Oxford.[n 1] While Robert Grosseteste had probably left shortly before Bacon's arrival, his work and legacy almost certainly influenced the young scholar[8] and it is possible Bacon subsequently visited him and William of Sherwood in Lincoln.[16] Bacon became a Master at Oxford, lecturing on Aristotle. There is no evidence he was ever awarded a doctorate. (The title Doctor Mirabilis was a posthumous scholastic accolade.) A caustic cleric named Roger Bacon is recorded speaking before the king at Oxford in 1233.[17]

A diorama of Bacon presenting one of his works to the chancellors of Paris University

In 1237 or at some point in the following decade, he accepted an invitation to teach at the University of Paris.[18] While there, he lectured on Latin grammar, Aristotelian logic, arithmetic, geometry, and the mathematical aspects of astronomy and music.[19] His faculty colleagues included Robert Kilwardby, Albertus Magnus, and Peter of Spain,[20] who may later become Pope as Pope John XXI.[21] The Cornishman Richard Rufus was a scholarly opponent.[19] In 1247 or soon after, he left his position in Paris.[21]

A 19th-century engraving of Bacon observing the stars at Oxford

As a private scholar, his whereabouts for the next decade are uncertain[22] but he was likely in Oxford c. 1248–1251, where he met Adam Marsh, and in Paris in 1251.[19] He seems to have studied most of the known Greek and Arabic works on optics[20] (then known as "perspective", perspectiva). A passage in the Opus Tertium states that at some point he took a two-year break from his studies.[12]

By the late 1250s, resentment against the king's preferential treatment of his émigré Poitevin relatives led to a coup and the imposition of the Provisions of Oxford and Westminster, instituting a baronial council and more frequent parliaments. Pope Urban IV absolved the king of his oath in 1261 and, after initial abortive resistance, Simon de Montfort led a force, enlarged due to recent crop failures, that prosecuted the Second Barons' War. Bacon's own family were considered royal partisans:[23] De Montfort's men seized their property[n 2] and drove several members into exile.[1]

Wellcome Library, oil
Ernest Board's portrayal of Bacon in his observatory at Merton College

In 1256 or 1257, he became a friar in the Franciscan Order in either Paris or Oxford, following the example of scholarly English Franciscans such as Grosseteste and Marsh.[19] After 1260, Bacon's activities were restricted by a statute prohibiting the friars of his order from publishing books or pamphlets without prior approval.[24] He was likely kept at constant menial tasks to limit his time for contemplation[25] and came to view his treatment as an enforced absence from scholarly life.[19]

By the mid-1260s, he was undertaking a search for patrons who could secure permission and funding for his return to Oxford.[25] For a time, Bacon was finally able to get around his superiors' interference through his acquaintance with Guy de Foulques, bishop of Narbonne, cardinal of Sabina, and the papal legate who negotiated between England's royal and baronial factions.[23]

In 1263 or 1264, a message garbled by Bacon's messenger, Raymond of Laon, led Guy to believe that Bacon had already completed a summary of the sciences. In fact, he had no money to research, let alone copy, such a work and attempts to secure financing from his family were thwarted by the Second Barons' War. However, in 1265, Guy was summoned to a conclave at Perugia that elected him Pope Clement IV.[26] William Benecor, who had previously been the courier between Henry III and the pope, now carried the correspondence between Bacon and Clement.[26] Clement's reply of 22 June 1266 commissioned "writings and remedies for current conditions", instructing Bacon not to violate any standing "prohibitions" of his order but to carry out his task in utmost secrecy.[26]

While faculties of the time were largely limited to addressing disputes on the known texts of Aristotle, Clement's patronage permitted Bacon to engage in a wide-ranging consideration of the state of knowledge in his era.[19] In 1267 or '68, Bacon sent the Pope his Opus Majus, which presented his views on how to incorporate Aristotelian logic and science into a new theology, supporting Grosseteste's text-based approach against the "sentence method" then fashionable.[19]

Bacon also sent his Opus Minus, De Multiplicatione Specierum,[27] De Speculis Comburentibus, an optical lens,[19] and possibly other works on alchemy and astrology.[27][n 3] The entire process has been called "one of the most remarkable single efforts of literary productivity", with Bacon composing referenced works of around a million words in about a year.[28]

Pope Clement died in 1268 and Bacon lost his protector. The Condemnations of 1277 banned the teaching of certain philosophical doctrines, including deterministic astrology. Some time within the next two years, Bacon was apparently imprisoned or placed under house arrest. This was traditionally ascribed to Franciscan Minister General Jerome of Ascoli, probably acting on behalf of the many clergy, monks, and educators attacked by Bacon's 1271 Compendium Studii Philosophiae.[1]

Modern scholarship, however, notes that the first reference to Bacon's "imprisonment" dates from eighty years after his death on the charge of unspecified "suspected novelties"[29][30] and finds it less than credible.[31] Contemporary scholars who do accept Bacon's imprisonment typically associate it with Bacon's "attraction to contemporary prophesies",[32] his sympathies for "the radical 'poverty' wing of the Franciscans",[31] interest in certain astrological doctrines,[33] or generally combative personality[30] rather than from "any scientific novelties which he may have proposed".[31]

Sometime after 1278, Bacon returned to the Franciscan House at Oxford, where he continued his studies[34] and is presumed to have spent most of the remainder of his life. His last dateable writing—the Compendium Studii Theologiae—was completed in 1292.[1] He seems to have died shortly afterwards and been buried at Oxford.[2][35]

Works

[edit]
A manuscript illustration of Bacon presenting one of his works to the chancellor of the University of Paris

Medieval European philosophy often relied on appeals to the authority of Church Fathers such as St Augustine, and on works by Plato and Aristotle only known at second hand or through Latin translations. By the 13th century, new works and better versions – in Arabic or in new Latin translations from the Arabic – began to trickle north from Muslim Spain. In Roger Bacon's writings, he upholds Aristotle's calls for the collection of facts before deducing scientific truths, against the practices of his contemporaries, arguing that "thence cometh quiet to the mind".

Bacon also called for reform with regard to theology. He argued that, rather than training to debate minor philosophical distinctions, theologians should focus their attention primarily on the Bible itself, learning the languages of its original sources thoroughly. He was fluent in several of these languages and was able to note and bemoan several corruptions of scripture, and of the works of the Greek philosophers that had been mistranslated or misinterpreted by scholars working in Latin. He also argued for the education of theologians in science ("natural philosophy") and its addition to the medieval curriculum.

Opus Majus

[edit]
Optic studies by Bacon
Main article: Opus Majus

Bacon's 1267 Greater Work, the Opus Majus,[n 4] contains treatments of mathematics, optics, alchemy, and astronomy, including theories on the positions and sizes of the celestial bodies. It is divided into seven sections: "The Four General Causes of Human Ignorance" (Causae Erroris),[36] "The Affinity of Philosophy with Theology" (Philosophiae cum Theologia Affinitas),[37] "On the Usefulness of Grammar" (De Utilitate Grammaticae),[38] "The Usefulness of Mathematics in Physics" (Mathematicae in Physicis Utilitas),[39] "On the Science of Perspective" (De Scientia Perspectivae),[40] "On Experimental Knowledge" (De Scientia Experimentali),[41] and "A Philosophy of Morality" (Moralis Philosophia).[42]

It was not intended as a complete work but as a "persuasive preamble" (persuasio praeambula), an enormous proposal for a reform of the medieval university curriculum and the establishment of a kind of library or encyclopedia, bringing in experts to compose a collection of definitive texts on these subjects.[43] The new subjects were to be "perspective" (i.e., optics), "astronomy" (inclusive of astronomy proper, astrology, and the geography necessary to use them), "weights" (likely some treatment of mechanics but this section of the Opus Majus has been lost), alchemy, agriculture (inclusive of botany and zoology), medicine, and "experimental science", a philosophy of science that would guide the others.[43] The section on geography was allegedly originally ornamented with a map based on ancient and Arabic computations of longitude and latitude, but has since been lost.[44] His (mistaken) arguments supporting the idea that dry land formed the larger proportion of the globe were apparently similar to those which later guided Columbus.[44]

In this work Bacon criticises his contemporaries Alexander of Hales and Albertus Magnus, who were held in high repute despite having only acquired their knowledge of Aristotle at second hand during their preaching careers.[45][46] Albert was received at Paris as an authority equal to Aristotle, Avicenna and Averroes,[47] a situation Bacon decried: "never in the world [had] such monstrosity occurred before."[48]

In Part I of the Opus Majus Bacon recognises some philosophers as the Sapientes, or gifted few, and saw their knowledge in philosophy and theology as superior to the vulgus philosophantium, or common herd of philosophers. He held Islamic thinkers between 1210 and 1265 in especially high regard calling them "both philosophers and sacred writers" and defended the integration of philosophy from apostate philosopher of the Islamic world into Christian learning.[49]

  • Spine of a 1750 edition of Opus majus
  • Title page of 1750 edition of Opus majus
  • First page of 1750 edition of Opus majus

Calendrical reform

[edit]
Main: Calendrical reform and Gregorian calendar

In Part IV of the Opus Majus, Bacon proposed a calendrical reform similar to the later system introduced in 1582 under Pope Gregory XIII.[39] Drawing on ancient Greek and medieval Islamic astronomy recently introduced to western Europe via Spain, Bacon continued the work of Robert Grosseteste and criticised the then-current Julian calendar as "intolerable, horrible, and laughable".

It had become apparent that Eudoxus and Sosigenes's assumption of a year of 365¼ days was, over the course of centuries, too inexact. Bacon charged that this meant the computation of Easter had shifted forward by 9 days since the First Council of Nicaea in 325.[50] His proposal to drop one day every 125 years[39][51] and to cease the observance of fixed equinoxes and solstices[50] was not acted upon following the death of Pope Clement IV in 1268. The eventual Gregorian calendar drops one day from the first three centuries in each set of 400 years.

Optics

[edit]
Bacon's diagram of light being refracted by a spherical container of water
See also: History of optics

In Part V of the Opus Majus, Bacon discusses physiology of eyesight and the anatomy of the eye and the brain, considering light, distance, position, and size, direct and reflected vision, refraction, mirrors, and lenses.[40] His treatment was primarily oriented by the Latin translation of Alhazen's Book of Optics. He also draws heavily on Eugene of Palermo's Latin translation of the Arabic translation of Ptolemy's Optics; on Robert Grosseteste's work based on Al-Kindi's Optics;[4][52] and, through Alhazen (Ibn al-Haytham), on Ibn Sahl's work on dioptrics.[53]

Gunpowder

[edit]
"Roger Bacon discovers gunpowder", "whereby Guy Fawkes was made possible",[54] an image from Bill Nye's Comic History of England[55]

A passage in the Opus Majus and another in the Opus Tertium are usually taken as the first European descriptions of a mixture containing the essential ingredients of gunpowder. Partington and others have come to the conclusion that Bacon most likely witnessed at least one demonstration of Chinese firecrackers, possibly obtained by Franciscans—including Bacon's friend William of Rubruck—who visited the Mongol Empire during this period.[56][n 5] The most telling passage reads:

We have an example of these things (that act on the senses) in [the sound and fire of] that children's toy which is made in many [diverse] parts of the world; i.e. a device no bigger than one's thumb. From the violence of that salt called saltpetre [together with sulphur and willow charcoal, combined into a powder] so horrible a sound is made by the bursting of a thing so small, no more than a bit of parchment [containing it], that we find [the ear assaulted by a noise] exceeding the roar of strong thunder, and a flash brighter than the most brilliant lightning.[56]

At the beginning of the 20th century, Henry William Lovett Hime of the Royal Artillery published the theory that Bacon's Epistola contained a cryptogram giving a recipe for the gunpowder he witnessed.[58] The theory was criticised by Thorndike in a 1915 letter to Science[59] and several books, a position joined by Muir,[60] John Maxson Stillman,[60] Steele,[61] and Sarton.[62] Needham et al. concurred with these earlier critics that the additional passage did not originate with Bacon[56] and further showed that the proportions supposedly deciphered (a 7:5:5 ratio of saltpetre to charcoal to sulphur) as not even useful for firecrackers, burning slowly with a great deal of smoke and failing to ignite inside a gun barrel.[63] The ~41% nitrate content is too low to have explosive properties.[64]

Friar Bacon in his study[65]

Secret of Secrets

[edit]
Main article: Secretum Secretorum

Bacon attributed the Secret of Secrets (Secretum Secretorum), the Islamic "Mirror of Princes" (Arabic: Sirr al-ʿasrar), to Aristotle, thinking that he had composed it for Alexander the Great. Bacon produced an edition of Philip of Tripoli's Latin translation, complete with his own introduction and notes; and his writings of the 1260s and 1270s cite it far more than his contemporaries did. This led Easton[66] and others, including Robert Steele,[67] to argue that the text spurred Bacon's own transformation into an experimentalist. (Bacon never described such a decisive impact himself.)[67] The dating of Bacon's edition of the Secret of Secrets is a key piece of evidence in the debate, with those arguing for a greater impact giving it an earlier date;[67] but it certainly influenced the elder Bacon's conception of the political aspects of his work in the sciences.[19]

Alchemy

[edit]
J. Nasmyth (1845)
A 19th-century etching of Bacon conducting an alchemical experiment

Bacon has been credited with a number of alchemical texts.[68]

The Letter on the Secret Workings of Art and Nature and on the Vanity of Magic (Epistola de Secretis Operibus Artis et Naturae et de Nullitate Magiae),[69] also known as On the Wonderful Powers of Art and Nature (De Mirabili Potestate Artis et Naturae), a likely-forged letter to an unknown "William of Paris," dismisses practices such as necromancy[70] but contains most of the alchemical formulae attributed to Bacon,[68] including one for a philosopher's stone[71] and another possibly for gunpowder.[56] It also includes several passages about hypothetical flying machines and submarines, attributing their first use to Alexander the Great.[72] On the Vanity of Magic or The Nullity of Magic is a debunking of esoteric claims in Bacon's time, showing that they could be explained by natural phenomena.[73]

He wrote on the medicine of Galen, referring to the translations of Avicenna. He believed that the medicine of Galen belonged to an ancient tradition passed through Chaldeans, Greeks and Arabs.[74] Although he provided a negative image of Hermes Trismegistus, his work was influenced by Hermetic thought[dubious – discuss][clarification needed].[75] Bacon's endorsement of Hermetic philosophy is evident, as his citations of the alchemical literature known as the Secretum Secretorum made several appearances in the Opus Majus. The Secretum Secretorum contains knowledge about the Hermetic Emerald Tablet, which was an integral component of alchemy, thus proving that Bacon's version of alchemy was much less secular, and much more spiritual than once interpreted. The importance of Hermetic philosophy in Bacon's work is also evident through his citations of classic Hermetic literature such as the Corpus Hermeticum. Bacon's citation of the Corpus Hermeticum, which consists of a dialogue between Hermes and the pagan deity Asclepius, proves that Bacon's ideas were much more in line with the spiritual aspects of alchemy rather than the scientific aspects. However, this is somewhat paradoxical as what Bacon was specifically trying to prove in the Opus Majus and subsequent works, was that spirituality and science were the same entity. Bacon believed that by using science, certain aspects of spirituality such as the attainment of "Sapientia" or "Divine Wisdom" could be logically explained using tangible evidence. Bacon's Opus Majus was first and foremost, a compendium of sciences which he believed would facilitate the first step towards "Sapientia". Bacon placed considerable emphasis on alchemy and even went so far as to state that alchemy was the most important science. The reason why Bacon kept the topic of alchemy vague for the most part, is due to the need for secrecy about esoteric topics in England at the time as well as his dedication to remaining in line with the alchemical tradition of speaking in symbols and metaphors.[76]

Linguistics

[edit]
Main article: Summa Grammatica
See also: Universal grammar

Bacon's early linguistic and logical works are the Overview of Grammar (Summa Grammatica), Summa de Sophismatibus et Distinctionibus, and the Summulae Dialectices or Summulae super Totam Logicam.[19] These are mature but essentially conventional presentations of Oxford and Paris's terminist and pre-modist logic and grammar.[19] His later work in linguistics is much more idiosyncratic, using terminology and addressing questions unique in his era.[77]

In his Greek and Hebrew Grammars (Grammatica Graeca and Hebraica), in his work "On the Usefulness of Grammar" (Book III of the Opus Majus), and in his Compendium of the Study of Philosophy,[77] Bacon stresses the need for scholars to know several languages.[78] Europe's vernacular languages are not ignored—he considers them useful for practical purposes such as trade, proselytism, and administration—but Bacon is mostly interested in his era's languages of science and religion: Arabic, Greek, Hebrew and Latin.[78]

Bacon is less interested in a full practical mastery of the other languages than on a theoretical understanding of their grammatical rules, ensuring that a Latin reader will not misunderstand passages' original meaning.[78] For this reason, his treatments of Greek and Hebrew grammar are not isolated works on their topic[78] but contrastive grammars treating the aspects which influenced Latin or which were required for properly understanding Latin texts.[79] He pointedly states, "I want to describe Greek grammar for the benefit of Latin speakers".[80][n 6] It is likely only this limited sense which was intended by Bacon's boast that he could teach an interested pupil a new language within three days.[79][n 7]

Passages in the Overview and the Greek grammar have been taken as an early exposition of a universal grammar underlying all human languages.[81] The Greek grammar contains the tersest and most famous exposition:[81]

Grammar is one and the same in all languages, substantially, though it may vary, accidentally, in each of them.[84][n 8]

However, Bacon's lack of interest in studying a literal grammar underlying the languages known to him and his numerous works on linguistics and comparative linguistics has prompted Hovdhaugen to question the usual literal translation of Bacon's grammatica in such passages.[85] She notes the ambiguity in the Latin term, which could refer variously to the structure of language, to its description, and to the science underlying such descriptions: i.e., linguistics.[85]

Other works

[edit]
A portrait of Roger Bacon from a 15th-century edition of De Retardatione[86]
The first page of the letter from Bacon to Clement IV introducing his Opus Tertium[87]

Bacon states that his Lesser Work (Opus Minus) and Third Work (Opus Tertium) were originally intended as summaries of the Opus Majus in case it was lost in transit.[43] Easton's review of the texts suggests that they became separate works over the course of the laborious process of creating a fair copy of the Opus Majus, whose half-million words were copied by hand and apparently greatly revised at least once.[28]

Other works by Bacon include his "Tract on the Multiplication of Species" (Tractatus de Multiplicatione Specierum),[88] "On Burning Lenses" (De Speculis Comburentibus), the Communia Naturalium and Mathematica, the "Compendium of the Study of Philosophy" and "of Theology" (Compendium Studii Philosophiae and Theologiae), and his Computus.[19] The "Compendium of the Study of Theology", presumably written in the last years of his life, was an anticlimax: adding nothing new, it is principally devoted to the concerns of the 1260s.

Apocrypha

[edit]

The Mirror of Alchimy (Speculum Alchemiae), a short treatise on the origin and composition of metals, is traditionally credited to Bacon.[89] It espouses the Arabian theory of mercury and sulphur forming the other metals, with vague allusions to transmutation. Stillman opined that "there is nothing in it that is characteristic of Roger Bacon's style or ideas, nor that distinguishes it from many unimportant alchemical lucubrations of anonymous writers of the thirteenth to the sixteenth centuries", and Muir and Lippmann also considered it a pseudepigraph.[90]

The cryptic Voynich manuscript has been attributed to Bacon by various sources, including by its first recorded owner,[91][92][93] but historians of science Lynn Thorndike and George Sarton dismissed these claims as unsupported,[94][95][96] and the vellum of the manuscript has since been dated to the 15th century.[97]

Legacy

[edit]
A woodcut from Robert Greene's play displaying the brazen head pronouncing "Time is. Time was. Time is past."
"Friar Bacon's Study" in Oxford. By the late 18th century this study on Folly Bridge had become a place of pilgrimage for scientists, but the building was pulled down in 1779 to allow for road widening.[98]
The Westgate plaque at Oxford

Bacon was largely ignored by his contemporaries in favour of other scholars such as Albertus Magnus, Bonaventure, and Thomas Aquinas,[14] although his works were studied by Bonaventure, John Pecham, and Peter of Limoges, through whom he may have influenced Raymond Lull.[20] He was also partially responsible for the addition of optics (perspectiva) to the medieval university curriculum.[7]

By the early modern period, the English considered him the epitome of a wise and subtle possessor of forbidden knowledge, a Faust-like magician who had tricked the devil and so was able to go to heaven. Of these legends, one of the most prominent was that he created a talking brazen head which could answer any question. The story appears in the anonymous 16th-century account of The Famous Historie of Fryer Bacon,[n 9] in which Bacon speaks with a demon but causes the head to speak by "the continuall fume of the six hottest Simples",[101] testing his theory that speech is caused by "an effusion of vapors".[102]

Around 1589, Robert Greene adapted the story for the stage as The Honorable Historie of Frier Bacon and Frier Bongay,[103][104][105] one of the most successful Elizabethan comedies.[104] As late as the 1640s, Thomas Browne was still complaining that "Every ear is filled with the story of Frier Bacon, that made a brazen head to speak these words, Time is".[106] Greene's Bacon spent seven years creating a brass head that would speak "strange and uncouth aphorisms"[107] to enable him to encircle Britain with a wall of brass that would make it impossible to conquer.

Unlike his source material, Greene does not cause his head to operate by natural forces but by "nigromantic charms" and "the enchanting forces of the devil":[108] i.e., by entrapping a dead spirit[102] or hobgoblin.[109] Bacon collapses, exhausted, just before his device comes to life and announces "Time is", "Time was", and "Time is Past"[110] before being destroyed in spectacular fashion: the stage direction instructs that "a lightening flasheth forth, and a hand appears that breaketh down the Head with a hammer".[111]

A necromantic head was ascribed to Pope Sylvester II as early as the 1120s,[112][n 10] but Browne considered the legend to be a misunderstanding of a passage in Peter the Good's c. 1335 Precious Pearl where the negligent alchemist misses the birth of his creation and loses it forever.[106] The story may also preserve the work by Bacon and his contemporaries to construct clockwork armillary spheres.[115] Bacon had praised a "self-activated working model of the heavens" as "the greatest of all things which have been devised".[116]

As early as the 16th century, natural philosophers such as Bruno, Dee[117] and Francis Bacon[7] were attempting to rehabilitate Bacon's reputation and to portray him as a scientific pioneer who had avoided the petty bickering of his contemporaries to attempt a rational understanding of nature. By the 19th century, commenters following Whewell[118][7] considered that "Bacon ... was not appreciated in his age because he was so completely in advance of it; he is a 16th- or 17th-century philosopher, whose lot has been by some accident cast in the 13th century".[14] His assertions in the Opus Majus that "theories supplied by reason should be verified by sensory data, aided by instruments, and corroborated by trustworthy witnesses"[119] were (and still are) considered "one of the first important formulations of the scientific method on record".[73]

This idea that Bacon was a modern experimental scientist reflected two views of the period: that the principal form of scientific activity is experimentation and that 13th-century Europe still represented the "Dark Ages".[120] This view, which is still reflected in some 21st-century popular science books,[123] portrays Bacon as an advocate of modern experimental science who emerged as a solitary genius in an age hostile to his ideas.[124] Based on Bacon's apocrypha, he is also portrayed as a visionary who predicted the invention of the submarine, aircraft, and automobile.[125] Consistent with this view of Bacon as a man ahead of his time, H. G. Wells's Outline of History attributes this prescient passage to him:

Machines for navigating are possible without rowers, so that great ships suited to river or ocean, guided by one man, may be borne with greater speed than if they were full of men. Likewise, cars may be made so that without a draught animal they may be moved cum impetu inaestimabili, as we deem the scythed chariots to have been from which antiquity fought. And flying machines are possible, so that a man may sit in the middle turning some device by which artificial wings may beat the air in the manner of a flying bird.[126]

However, in the course of the 20th century, Husserl, Heidegger and others emphasised the importance to the modern science of Cartesian and Galilean projections of mathematics over sensory perceptions of nature; Heidegger, in particular, noted the lack of such an understanding in Bacon's works.[7] Although Crombie,[127] Kuhn[128] and Schramm [de][129] continued to argue for Bacon's importance to the development of "qualitative" areas of modern science,[7] Duhem,[130] Thorndike,[131][132] Carton[133] and Koyré[134] emphasised the essentially medieval nature of Bacon's scientia experimentalis.[133][135]

Research also established that Bacon was probably not as isolated—and not as persecuted—as was once thought. Many medieval sources of and influences on Bacon's scientific activity have been identified.[136] In particular, Bacon often mentioned his debt to the work of Robert Grosseteste:[137] his work on optics and the calendar followed Grosseteste's lead,[138] as did his idea that inductively-derived conclusions should be submitted for verification through experimental testing.[139]

Bacon noted of William of Sherwood that "nobody was greater in philosophy than he";[140][141] praised Peter of Maricourt (the author of "A Letter on Magnetism")[142] and John of London as "perfect" mathematicians; Campanus of Novara (the author of works on astronomy, astrology, and the calendar) and a Master Nicholas as "good";[143] and acknowledged the influence of Adam Marsh and lesser figures. Some scholars have pushed back on his reputation as an isolated genius.[137]

As a result, the picture of Bacon has changed. Bacon is now seen as part of his age: a leading figure in the beginnings of the medieval universities at Paris and Oxford but one joined in the development of the philosophy of science by Robert Grosseteste, William of Auvergne, Henry of Ghent, Albert Magnus, Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, and William of Ockham.[144] Lindberg summarised:

Bacon was not a modern, out of step with his age, or a harbinger of things to come, but a brilliant, combative, and somewhat eccentric schoolman of the thirteenth century, endeavoring to take advantage of the new learning just becoming available while remaining true to traditional notions... of the importance to be attached to philosophical knowledge".[145]

A recent review of the many visions of Bacon across the ages says contemporary scholarship still neglects one of the most important aspects of his life and thought: his commitment to the Franciscan order.

His Opus majus was a plea for reform addressed to the supreme spiritual head of the Christian faith, written against a background of apocalyptic expectation and informed by the driving concerns of the friars. It was designed to improve training for missionaries and to provide new skills to be employed in the defence of the Christian world against the enmity of non-Christians and of the Antichrist. It cannot usefully be read solely in the context of the history of science and philosophy.[146]

With regard to religion's influence on Bacon's philosophy, Charles Sanders Peirce noted, "To Roger Bacon,... the schoolmen's conception of reasoning appeared only an obstacle to truth... [but] Of all kinds of experience, the best, he thought, was interior illumination, which teaches many things about Nature which the external senses could never discover, such as the transubstantiation of bread."[147] Later scholars have therefore viewed him as a proto-protestant.[148]

In Oxford lore, Bacon is credited as the namesake of Folly Bridge for having been placed under house arrest nearby.[149] Although this is probably untrue,[150] it had formerly been known as "Friar Bacon's Bridge".[151] Bacon is also honoured at Oxford by a plaque affixed to the wall of the Westgate shopping centre.[149]

[edit]
William Blake's visionary head of "Friar Bacon"

To commemorate the 700th anniversary of Bacon's approximate year of birth, Prof. J. Erskine wrote the biographical play A Pageant of the Thirteenth Century, which was performed and published by Columbia University in 1914.[152][153] A fictionalised account of Bacon's life and times also appears in the second book of James Blish's After Such Knowledge trilogy, the 1964 Doctor Mirabilis.[154] Bacon serves as a mentor to the protagonists of Thomas Costain's 1945 The Black Rose,[155][156] and Umberto Eco's 1980 The Name of the Rose.[157] Greene's play prompted a less successful sequel John of Bordeaux and was recast as a children's story for James Baldwin's 1905 Thirty More Famous Stories Retold.[158] "The Brazen Head of Friar Bacon" also appears in Daniel Defoe's 1722 Journal of the Plague Year, Nathaniel Hawthorne's 1843 "The Birth-Mark" and 1844 "The Artist of the Beautiful", William Douglas O'Connor's 1891 "The Brazen Android" (where Bacon devises it to terrify King Henry into accepting Simon de Montfort's demands for greater democracy),[159][160] John Cowper Powys's 1956 The Brazen Head, and Robertson Davies's 1970 Fifth Business.[161] Bacon appears in Rudyard Kipling's 1926 story 'The Eye of Allah'.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Roger Bacon

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Roger Bacon (c. 1214/20 – c. 1292), known as Doctor Mirabilis, was a 13th-century English philosopher, Franciscan friar, and scholar whose work anticipated modern scientific inquiry through his advocacy for empirical observation and mathematical reasoning in natural philosophy. Born in Ilchester, Somerset, Bacon studied at Oxford University and the University of Paris, where he became one of the first Western lecturers on Aristotle's works as interpreted by Islamic scholars like Avicenna and Averroes. Joining the Franciscan Order around 1257, he later returned to Oxford, producing major treatises such as the Opus Majus, Opus Minus, and Opus Tertium in the 1260s at the request of Pope Clement IV, which emphasized the integration of optics, alchemy, astronomy, and linguistics with theology. Bacon's contributions to experimental science included pioneering studies in optics—describing the magnifying properties of lenses and the anatomy of the eye—and critiques of traditional scholasticism in favor of direct experimentation and the study of languages like Greek, Hebrew, and Arabic to access original sources. Despite facing imprisonment around 1277, possibly lasting until c. 1292, due to conflicts with Franciscan authorities over his radical views and rumored support for apocalyptic prophecies, his ideas influenced later figures like Leonardo da Vinci and the Scientific Revolution.

Biography

Early Life

Roger Bacon was born in Ilchester, , , c. 1214 to a prosperous family of landowners with knightly ties. He had at least two brothers, both of whom were knights. The Bacon family supported King Henry III during the turbulent reign marked by baronial rebellions and civil unrest following the of 1215, which contributed to an intellectual climate in emphasizing legal and philosophical inquiry, including emerging Aristotelian scholarship. However, their loyalty to the crown led to significant economic hardships, as the family lost much of its property amid the political conflicts and social disruptions of the Second Barons' War. These familial experiences of instability and the broader post-Magna Carta environment, with its focus on rational discourse and classical learning, likely sparked Bacon's early interest in scholarly pursuits. He received initial education at home before transitioning to formal studies at in the late 1220s or early 1230s.

Education

Roger Bacon likely began his formal education at the in the late 1220s or early 1230s, where he pursued studies in the arts faculty under influential masters such as , possibly chancellor of the university c. 1215–1221 and a key figure in promoting Aristotelian logic and . Grosseteste's emphasis on as the foundation for understanding and other natural sciences profoundly shaped Bacon's interdisciplinary approach, introducing him to experimental methods and the integration of empirical observation with theoretical reasoning. During this period, approximately spanning the late 1220s to early 1240s, Bacon engaged deeply with the , focusing on logic, metaphysics, and the physical world, which laid the groundwork for his later advocacy of a unified scientific . Around 1240, Bacon relocated to the , where he earned his degree and lectured in the Faculty of Arts throughout the 1240s. At , he encountered the vibrant intellectual scene dominated by radical , including the interpretations of that sparked intense debates between proponents of reason and advocates of faith as the primary path to knowledge. This exposure highlighted the tensions within , influencing Bacon's critiques of overly speculative and his push for knowledge grounded in observation and . Bacon's curriculum encompassed the traditional —, , and logic—and —arithmetic, , , and astronomy—providing a rigorous foundation in both humanistic and quantitative disciplines. He demonstrated particular proficiency in and languages, mastering Latin while acquiring basic proficiency in Greek and Hebrew to access original texts in , , and . These linguistic skills enabled him to engage directly with non-Latin sources, underscoring his commitment to philological accuracy in scholarly pursuits. The scholastic environment at both and , including encounters with figures like , reinforced Bacon's vision of integrated knowledge, where , , and the liberal arts converged to reveal divine order in the universe. While Bacon later critiqued certain aspects of Albertus's universalist metaphysics, the broader scholastic tradition inspired his holistic framework, blending empirical investigation with theological insight. This educational synthesis distinguished Bacon as a thinker who sought to harmonize diverse fields under a rational, God-given structure of learning.

Franciscan Career

Around 1257, Roger Bacon joined the Franciscan Order at , committing to the vows of , , and obedience that defined the life of the friars minor (though some sources suggest c. 1251). This decision marked a pivotal shift from his earlier secular academic pursuits, aligning his intellectual endeavors with the order's emphasis on humility and communal study, though it imposed strict constraints on personal resources and autonomy. In the 1240s, as a regent master in the Faculty of Arts at , Bacon delivered lectures on Aristotle's texts, including the Physics and Metaphysics, as well as on the logical treatises of Peter of , such as the Summulae Logicales. These teachings contributed to the vibrant scholastic environment at the university, fostering debates on empirical observation and logical rigor amid the recent influx of Aristotelian translations from sources. During the early 1260s, Bacon cultivated correspondence with influential patrons, notably Cardinal Guy de Foulques, the to , seeking support for his scholarly projects despite the order's prohibitions on such activities without permission. Foulques, who ascended to the papacy as Clement IV in 1265, encouraged Bacon's work, leading to the production of early writings that integrated theology and within monastic limits, including commentaries on Aristotelian and calls for reform to prioritize studies in languages, mathematics, and experimental methods over rote . These efforts highlighted Bacon's vision for renewing Church learning through interdisciplinary approaches, though they remained preliminary to his later major treatises.

Imprisonment and Later Years

In 1266, , a former acquaintance from Bacon's days, commissioned him to produce a summary of his scientific and philosophical writings, prompting the hurried composition of key works such as the , Opus Minus, and Opus Tertium. This papal directive provided rare official support for Bacon's scholarly pursuits amid growing tensions within the Franciscan order over his innovative ideas. By 1277, Bacon's outspoken critiques and emphasis on experimental science, alchemy, astrology, and ecclesiastical reforms led to his condemnation by Franciscan superiors for "suspected novelties." He was imprisoned or placed under c. 1277–1279, possibly in the Franciscan friary at (though some sources suggest the convent in , ), where restrictions severely limited his access to books, materials, and intellectual collaboration for several years. Scholarly accounts debate the severity and exact duration of this confinement, but it effectively curtailed his productivity and isolated him from community. Bacon was reportedly released before 1292, the year of his death in . He was buried on June 11 (St. Barnabas' Day) in the precincts of the Grey Friars friary, now the site of Paradise Square. Records of his final years are sparse, reflecting the order's suppression of his activities.

Philosophical Foundations

and

Bacon's centered on three principal means to achieve certitude in knowledge: , reason, and (experientia). , derived from sacred texts and figures, provided an unassailable foundation for theological truths but held limited sway in secular sciences. Reason enabled logical deduction from established premises, yet Bacon warned it alone could not eliminate doubt without empirical corroboration. , however, emerged as the superior prong for , as it directly confronted phenomena through sensory and testing, ensuring reliable outcomes where abstract argumentation fell short. He sharply critiqued the scholastic tendency to defer uncritically to ancient authorities like in astronomy and in medicine, arguing that such reliance perpetuated errors stemming from faulty translations and unverified assumptions. Bacon insisted that these venerable sources must be subjected to experimental verification to distinguish truth from , as mere without testing hindered intellectual progress and practical utility. Without this empirical check, scholars risked propagating inaccuracies that undermined the pursuit of genuine wisdom. At the heart of Bacon's methodological innovation lay scientia experimentalis, which he elevated as a supreme discipline beyond mere speculation, capable of both confirming rational conclusions and revealing nature's qualities through methodical inquiry. This experimental encompassed iterative testing, where initial demonstrations were refined via repeated trials and the aid of instruments to extend human senses, fostering discoveries inaccessible to unaided intellect. Bacon portrayed it as the "queen of s," essential for bridging theoretical with practical certainty in the study of the physical world. Mathematics occupied a pivotal role in Bacon's framework as the precise language of science, indispensable for articulating hypotheses and validating them against experiential data. He viewed mathematical reasoning as conferring unparalleled certainty, free from the ambiguities of qualitative description, and advocated its application to quantify natural phenomena and predict verifiable outcomes. Through mathematics, conjectures in fields like optics or mechanics could be rigorously tested, ensuring that scientific claims rested on demonstrable foundations rather than conjecture.

Theology and Natural Philosophy

Roger Bacon viewed the natural world as a divine , akin to a second book authored by , through which the study of unveils the Creator's wisdom and power. This perspective positioned as an essential but ancillary discipline to , serving to illuminate scriptural truths rather than supplanting them. Bacon argued that empirical investigation of creation deepens understanding of God's providence, emphasizing that all natural phenomena operate under divine authority and reflect theological principles. In his treatment of astrology, Bacon rejected deterministic interpretations that portrayed celestial bodies as inexorable controllers of human fate, instead affirming their influences as subordinate to God's overarching providence. He maintained that while stars and planets exert effects on earthly events through natural forces, these are always mediated by divine will, allowing for free human agency and . This nuanced stance enabled Bacon to integrate astronomical knowledge into a Christian framework without compromising theological . Bacon upheld the Christian doctrine of the soul's immortality, positing that the rational soul, united with the body during life, survives death to face eschatological judgment. He connected these beliefs to practical scientific endeavors, such as his advocacy for calendrical reform to ensure accurate computation of Easter, which he saw as vital for proper observance of the liturgical calendar and preparation for the end times. This linkage underscored his conviction that scientific precision aids in aligning human practices with divine eschatology. Bacon sharply critiqued contemporary scholastic theology for its neglect of essential languages like Greek, Hebrew, and , as well as the sciences of and experimental inquiry, which he deemed indispensable for sound theological interpretation. He contended that this oversight led to errors in understanding Scripture and , advocating a comprehensive of to foster moral renewal and intellectual rigor within the Franciscan order and broader . Such reforms, in Bacon's view, would counteract corruption and prepare the faithful for apocalyptic challenges.

Key Scientific Contributions

Optics and Perspectiva

Bacon's treatise on optics, known as Perspectiva, forms the fifth part of his Opus Majus (c. 1267) and represents a systematic synthesis of the science of vision, integrating mathematical geometry with the physics of light. Drawing extensively from Greek authorities such as Euclid, Ptolemy, and Aristotle, as well as Arabic scholars like Alhazen (Ibn al-Haytham) in his Book of Optics and Avicenna, Bacon positions perspectiva as the foundational science for understanding natural phenomena, emphasizing its role in explaining how light enables perception. He argues that vision occurs through the reception of luminous or colored "species" emitted by objects, rather than rays projecting from the eye—aligning with the intromission theory developed by Alhazen. Central to Bacon's optical theory is the concept of the multiplication of species, detailed in his separate De multiplicatione specierum. In this framework, light and color originate from self-luminous sources or colored bodies and propagate as immaterial, force-like entities called "species" that multiply successively through transparent media, diminishing in intensity with distance but preserving their qualitative nature. These species travel along straight lines in uniform media but can be refracted when entering denser substances or reflected off surfaces, allowing Bacon to unify diverse phenomena under a single causal mechanism. He describes five modes of multiplication—direct, refracted, reflected, refracted-reflected, and accidental—each governed by geometric laws, such as the equality of angles in reflection. This theory, inspired by Alhazen's analysis of propagation, extends beyond vision to explain in nature, though Bacon applies it primarily to optical effects. Bacon provides a detailed anatomy of the eye, portraying it as a complex organ with six tunics (including the , , and ) and three humors (aqueous, crystalline, and vitreous). The serves as the entry point for visual , which pass through the aqueous humor to the central crystalline lens—the eye's principal sensitive organ—where they are focused for . Behind the lens, the vitreous humor further aids in refracting and stabilizing the rays, preventing distortion, while the transmits the formed image to the brain's . Bacon includes schematic diagrams tracing ray paths through the eye's chambers, illustrating how proper alignment of on the lens produces clear vision, and how defects like opacity lead to conditions such as cataracts. This model, adapted from Alhazen and Hunayn ibn Ishaq's translations, underscores the eye's dioptric function as a natural . In explaining optical phenomena, Bacon employs qualitative geometric arguments centered on angles of incidence and . occurs when bend at the interface of media of differing rarity, as seen in the apparent displacement of objects , where rays from a denser to rarer medium diverge. Reflection follows the that the incident equals the reflected , enabling mirrors to redirect ; Bacon describes burning mirrors—concave surfaces that converge parallel rays to a focal point, igniting combustibles by concentrating solar , with the depending on the mirror's . Magnifying lenses, formed from convex , enlarge images by spreading refracted rays, allowing the observation of minute details, such as text for the elderly, through increased angular size. For rainbows, Bacon attributes their arc and colors to sunlight's upon entering raindrops, internal reflection at equal angles, and subsequent upon exit, dispersing white light into a based on wavelength-dependent bending in the spherical medium; he measures the primary bow's at approximately 42 degrees from the . Bacon extends these principles to applications in perspective, advocating mathematical to model vision accurately. In , perspectiva guides the representation of depth and proportion by tracing lines of sight from observer to object, ensuring foreshortening and vanishing points align with ray for realistic depictions. In astronomy, it informs the interpretation of celestial observations by accounting for atmospheric refraction's distortion of star positions near the horizon, thus refining positional measurements in instruments like the quadrant. Through such integrations, Bacon demonstrates ' utility in bridging sensory experience with quantifiable laws.

Mathematics, Astronomy, and Calendrical Reform

Roger Bacon regarded mathematics as the indispensable foundation for all sciences, arguing that it alone offered demonstrative certainty and served as the gateway to reliable knowledge in fields ranging from natural philosophy to theology. In the Opus Majus (1267), he declared that "mathematics is the door and key to the sciences," emphasizing its role in purging errors from the intellect and enabling precise applications across disciplines. He particularly highlighted mathematics' utility in astronomy through the construction and use of tables for planetary positions, which he saw as essential for accurate celestial predictions and computations, though he himself focused on advocating for their refinement rather than authoring new ones. These tables, derived from observational data, allowed for the calculation of planetary motions and their influences, underscoring Bacon's belief that mathematical rigor was prerequisite to advancing any empirical inquiry. Bacon offered a pointed critique of Ptolemaic astronomy, identifying inaccuracies in its treatment of precession—the gradual westward shift of the equinoxes relative to the fixed stars—and proposing corrections grounded in his own observations. While Ptolemy's Almagest had established a uniform precession rate of about 1 degree per 100 years, medieval adaptations like the trepidation model introduced oscillatory variations that Bacon deemed erroneous and unsupported by evidence. In the Opus Majus, he advocated returning to a linear precession model but adjusted it based on empirical data, including measurements of the solar apogee's position, which he calculated had advanced significantly since Ptolemy's time. Bacon specifically contested the Dominican scholar Giles of Lessines' interpretation of precession, arguing that it failed to account for observed discrepancies in stellar and solar alignments, and he called for updated tables to reflect a precession rate closer to 1 degree per 70–80 years derived from historical eclipses and contemporary sightings. This critique positioned mathematics not merely as a tool but as a corrective force against inherited astronomical flaws. Bacon's proposals for calendrical reform addressed the Julian calendar's drift, which he attributed to its year length exceeding the true solar year by roughly 11 minutes and 14 seconds, resulting in an accumulated error of approximately 9 days since the in 325 CE. In Part IV of the , he outlined a comprehensive plan to realign the calendar with solar reality by immediately omitting 7 to 9 days from in a —effectively shifting the vernal back to —and instituting periodic adjustments thereafter to prevent future discrepancies. Over centuries, this would involve shortening the average year through refined leap-year rules, harmonizing solar cycles with the ecclesiastical calendar to ensure festivals like fell on astronomically correct dates. Bacon's reform anticipated the 1582 by emphasizing empirical solar observations over tradition, though he urged papal authority to implement it without disrupting the Nicene computations. Central to Bacon's calendrical work were his advancements in computus, the art of calculating Easter's date as the first Sunday after the paschal following the vernal . He refined techniques by integrating arithmetic progressions to model the 19-year Metonic lunar cycle against the 28-year , using to predict lunar phases with greater precision than prevailing tables. Drawing on Arabic astronomical sources and his own computations, Bacon developed methods to adjust for the moon's anomalous motion and epacts—the ages of the moon on January 1—ensuring the paschal aligned closely with actual lunar events. These innovations, detailed in the , aimed to resolve discrepancies between ecclesiastical and astronomical timings, promoting a computus that relied on verifiable mathematical cycles rather than outdated approximations.

Alchemy, Chemistry, and Experimental Practices

Roger Bacon distinguished between speculative , which theoretically explores the transmutation of substances and the underlying principles of matter, and practical , focused on the production of useful compounds such as medicines and elixirs for extending human life. In his Opus Minus, Bacon outlined practical recipes for preparing elixirs, involving processes like pulverization of minerals, solidification through heating, to separate volatile components, sublimation to purify solids, and extraction of oils, all aimed at creating potent remedies rather than mere gold-making. These methods reflected his interest in as a tool for medical advancement, linking it to his broader advocacy for experimental over mere speculation. Bacon's experimental protocols emphasized controlled conditions to ensure reliability, including precise regulation of heating in furnaces to avoid overheating or incomplete reactions, descriptions of distillation apparatus such as alembics for collecting condensates, and tests for substance purity through observation of color, texture, and solubility after processing. He advocated for repeated trials to verify results, insisting that alchemical operations must be reproducible under standardized conditions to distinguish genuine transformations from illusions. Bacon stressed the importance of mathematical precision in measurements, such as weighing ingredients accurately, to achieve consistent outcomes in these laboratory practices. In his theories of matter, Bacon integrated Aristotelian concepts of the four elements—earth, water, air, and —with principles, positing that all substances arise from combinations of these elements and their qualities (hot, , wet, dry). Specifically for metals, he adopted the mercury-sulfur theory, viewing mercury as the fluid, volatile principle and as the combustible, fixed one, whose balanced union forms different metals like or silver depending on their proportions and purity. This framework underpinned his speculative , where transmutation involved separating and recombining these principles to mimic natural generation. Bacon frequently warned against fraud in alchemy, criticizing practitioners who used sleight-of-hand or impure materials to feign transmutations, such as tinting base metals to resemble without true change. He urged verification through rigorous, repeated experimental trials rather than accepting untested claims, arguing that only empirical demonstration could expose deceptions and advance genuine knowledge. This emphasis on caution and testing aligned with his overall promotion of scientia experimentalis as a safeguard against .

Gunpowder and Military Technology

Roger Bacon provided one of the earliest European accounts of gunpowder in his Opus Majus (1267), framing it within his advocacy for experimental science as a means to uncover nature's hidden powers, though he emphasized its dual potential for utility and catastrophe. He described the substance as a finely ground mixture of saltpetre (potassium nitrate), charcoal (ideally from willow wood), and sulphur, noting its ignition properties: when kindled in a confined space, it generates intense heat and pressure, leading to a rapid combustion that defies ordinary fire-suppression methods. The precise proportions Bacon outlined—approximately 41% saltpetre, 29% , and 29% sulphur (or a 7:5:5 ratio by parts)—were encoded in an in his Opus Tertium to safeguard the from misuse, reflecting his view of as a "secret of art and nature." This formula, when properly prepared and ignited, produces a thunderous from even a small quantity, as Bacon vividly illustrated: "From the violence of that salt called saltpetre, so horrible a sound is made by the bursting of a thing so small, no more than a bit of , that we have no more fearful sight or sound." He cautioned that the resulting blaze spreads uncontrollably, overwhelming all nearby materials and posing lethal risks during preparation or storage if not handled with extreme care by experts. Bacon's awareness of gunpowder likely stemmed from Arabic translations of Chinese alchemical texts, where saltpetre was termed "Chinese snow," positioning it as an exotic "secret of secrets" transmitted westward through scholarly exchanges. In military contexts, he foresaw its transformative role in warfare, including propulsion for stone-hurling engines, rocket-like projectiles, and incendiary devices akin to bombs that could raze fortifications or ignite urban areas, instilling terror in adversaries through sheer destructive force. Despite these innovations, Bacon raised profound ethical alarms, arguing that gunpowder's capacity for mass devastation rendered it unfit for indiscriminate use, potentially endangering the survival of if wielded by the immoral or ignorant. He advocated restricting the formula to enlightened Christian princes and theologians solely for defensive purposes against infidels, warning that broader dissemination could precipitate global ruin and contravene divine order. This moral restraint underscored his broader , where knowledge served piety and protection rather than unchecked aggression.

Linguistic and Grammatical Studies

Theories of Language and Signs

Roger Bacon developed a comprehensive semiotic theory in his treatise De signis, part of the third section of the Opus Maius, where he portrayed language as a structured system of signs (signa) that parallels the natural "species" emitted by objects in the physical world, particularly in the context of optics and cognition. These linguistic signs function similarly to natural signs by conveying knowledge through representation, but Bacon emphasized their conventional nature, instituted by human will and subject to variation across languages. He argued that signs are inherently relational, belonging to the category of relation (praedicamentum relationis), as a sign exists only insofar as it relates to an object it signifies and an interpreter who cognizes it through that relation. This framework underscores language's role in bridging the material and intellectual realms, enabling precise communication essential for both scientific inquiry and theological understanding. A central concern in Bacon's theory was the ambiguity introduced by translation errors, particularly in the medieval transmission of Greek and texts into Latin, which he viewed as distorting the original meanings and impeding accurate . For instance, mistranslations of Aristotelian and Avicennian terms led to conceptual confusions in and , as words failed to faithfully mirror the intended or essences. Bacon contended that such errors arise because languages are not universal but culturally specific systems of signs, where the same term might evoke different relations or interpretations, thus hindering the pursuit of truth in disciplines reliant on textual . To mitigate this, he advocated for direct study of original languages to preserve the of signification. Bacon sharply critiqued the inadequacies of contemporary Latin , describing it as corrupted and insufficient for capturing the subtleties of natural signification, especially compared to the more philosophically robust structures of Greek and Hebrew. He proposed grammatical reforms modeled on these ancient languages, which he considered closer to the divine order of creation and better equipped to express universal modes of being. In Greek, for example, and morphology allowed for clearer distinctions in relational signs, while Hebrew's preserved etymological transparency, avoiding the "barbarisms" that plagued Latin through admixtures of influences. These reforms aimed to align with speculative principles, treating it not merely as a practical tool but as a of signs that reveals the properties of things themselves. In and , Bacon highlighted the pivotal role of signification through the modi significandi (modes of speaking or signifying), which describe how words convey properties of things—such as substance, quality, or relation—in a manner analogous to how natural inform the senses. He integrated this into his , arguing that proper signification ensures theological doctrines, like the , are articulated without , while in , it facilitates experimental verification by linking verbal descriptions to observable phenomena. Misapplication of modi significandi could lead to heretical interpretations or flawed hypotheses, as words might signify multiple modes simultaneously. Bacon illustrated the dangers of —words with multiple meanings—through examples like the Latin term spiritus, which could denote breath, soul, or , thereby confusing theological and . Such ambiguities, he warned, obstruct by allowing erroneous inferences, as interpreters might impose unintended relations on signs, leading to disputes in scriptural or . To counter this, Bacon championed the adoption of clear, univocal nomenclature, drawing from philosophical and scriptural precedents to standardize terms and enhance precision across disciplines, ultimately serving his vision of as a reliable instrument for divine .

Advocacy for Language Learning

Roger Bacon strongly advocated for the study of original languages, particularly Greek, Hebrew, and , as essential for accessing uncorrupted ancient in and the sciences. He argued that proficiency in these "languages of wisdom" was indispensable for accurate of the and comprehension of philosophical and scientific texts, which were often transmitted through flawed intermediaries. Without such knowledge, scholars risked perpetuating errors that obscured and natural knowledge. Bacon critiqued medieval Latin translations for their numerous inaccuracies, stemming from translators' inadequate command of the source languages and failure to consult originals. For instance, in Aristotle's De plantis, the term belenum (henbane, a poisonous , or specifically its ) is described as dangerous in Persia but edible if planted in ; however, as a Spanish word unfamiliar to translators and readers in or , it led to confusion and dangerous misinterpretations of botanical and medicinal properties. Similarly, he highlighted errors in scriptural translations, such as corruptions in the Latin that distorted Hebrew and Greek terms for divine names and prophecies, resulting in false interpretations that undermined theological . These flaws, Bacon contended, not only hindered scientific progress but also sowed confusion in biblical understanding. To address these issues, Bacon proposed sweeping curriculum reforms in universities, urging the integration of as a foundational discipline. He outlined eight reasons for prioritizing language study, including the historical of Latin saints, philosophers, and poets who mastered foreign tongues, and the practical necessity for emending defective texts. His vision called for a structured program where students progressed through stages of , culminating in the ability to produce reliable translations, thereby revitalizing the entire scholarly enterprise. The practical benefits of such extended across , , and the sciences, enabling precise interpretation of sacred texts, legal codes derived from ancient sources, and empirical investigations free from translational distortions. Bacon also hinted at applications in , where knowledge of multiple alphabets and scripts—such as substituting Hebrew or Greek letters for Latin ones—facilitated and the concealment of sensitive knowledge from the uninitiated. His semiotic theories briefly underpinned this emphasis, positing that signs in their original linguistic forms preserved intended meanings essential for all interpretive fields.

Major Works

Opus Majus

The Opus Majus, Latin for "Greater Work," is 's most extensive and influential treatise, composed between late 1266 and 1267 in response to a direct request from . On June 22, 1266, the Pope, having heard of Bacon's innovative ideas on and learning, instructed him to submit his writings on remedies for the "great dangers" facing the Church, bypassing the restrictions of Bacon's Franciscan order that prohibited new compositions without approval. Working in secrecy and under financial hardship in , Bacon produced the work rapidly, completing it by early 1267 and dispatching a presentation copy to the Pope via a trusted messenger. This encyclopedic effort aimed to correlate the entirety of contemporary knowledge with theology, advocating for educational reforms to strengthen the Church against internal errors and external threats like . The treatise is structured into seven distinct parts, reflecting Bacon's hierarchical vision of knowledge where subordinate disciplines serve higher theological ends. Part I addresses the four principal causes of human ignorance—authority, custom, popular opinion, and concealment of ignorance—laying a foundation for critical inquiry. Part II establishes the subordination of philosophy to theology, arguing that secular sciences illuminate divine truths. Part III emphasizes the study of languages (Hebrew, Greek, Arabic) as essential for accessing original texts and avoiding translation errors. Part IV covers mathematics as the gateway to all sciences, including astronomy and calendar reform. Part V treats optics (Perspectiva), drawing on light's role in creation. Part VI explores experimental science (scientia experimentalis) as a means to verify theories and uncover God's secrets. Part VII, on moral philosophy, integrates ethics with politics and rhetoric to guide Church leadership. This organization innovates by integrating disciplines progressively, with languages and mathematics as prerequisites for advanced sciences, all oriented toward moral and theological reform. No autograph manuscript of the Opus Majus survives, but the original presentation copy reached before his death in 1268, after which it circulated among scholars despite Bacon's by his order in 1277. Medieval copies proliferated in monastic and university libraries, with key exemplars including 14th- and 15th-century manuscripts in the at (e.g., MS Digby 67) and the . The work's textual history reveals interpolations and abbreviations in later versions, but the standard edition derives from these, first critically edited by John Henry Bridges in 1897–1900 based on multiple codices. Bacon's structure and emphasis on empirical methods show clear influence from , whose treatises on and light (De luce) and experimental approaches informed Parts V and VI, though Bacon expands them into a broader encyclopedic framework. The Opus Minus, completed around 1267 or 1268, functions as a shorter companion to the Opus Majus, condensing its arguments into a more accessible format for presentation to Pope Clement IV. Written amid Bacon's ongoing health struggles, including severe eye problems that limited his writing, the work was dispatched urgently via a trusted pupil to fulfill the pope's 1266 request for a comprehensive overview of scientific and philosophical reforms, despite the Franciscan order's prohibitions on such external communications. In the Opus Minus, Bacon summarizes major errors affecting contemporary scholarship and practice, focusing on inaccuracies in the calendar that had accumulated since the Council of Nicaea, flawed philosophical assumptions derived from mistranslations of , and institutional shortcomings within the Church, such as inadequate moral and doctrinal oversight. A distinctive feature is its enumeration of the "seven sins" plaguing theological study—excessive reliance on authority without verification, neglect of scriptural languages, undue emphasis on dialectical subtleties over moral application, and similar vices—which Bacon presents as barriers to true wisdom, drawing from but expanding upon themes in the . The text also incorporates pointed critiques of contemporary scholars, including attacks on the Parisian masters for their dogmatic adherence to outdated interpretations and on figures like Albert the Great for insufficient experimental rigor in . Only one complete manuscript of the Opus Minus survives, preserved in the library of , dating to the late ; this version differs from the Opus Majus not only in brevity—spanning about one-third the length—but also in its inclusion of these explicit contemporary rebukes and a more polemical tone aimed at immediate ecclesiastical reform. The work overlaps structurally with the Opus Majus by mirroring its divisions on causes of error and the role of experimental science, yet it prioritizes practical summaries over detailed expositions. The Opus Tertium, composed around 1267–1268, is another key summary prepared for , serving as an introductory overview to Bacon's broader project. It outlines the defects in contemporary learning, particularly in and , and proposes remedies through the integration of languages, , and experimental . Bacon defends his approach against Franciscan prohibitions and emphasizes the urgency of reform to counter threats to the Church. The work includes autobiographical elements and detailed critiques of scholastic methods. Only fragments survive, with the primary manuscript in the Biblioteca Communale di Assisi (MS 154). The Compendium Studii Philosophiae, dated to approximately 1272, represents another abbreviated , this time synthesizing Bacon's vision for restructuring philosophical education to harmonize the liberal arts with . Composed after the papal commissions but reflecting persistent concerns about academic decline, it advocates for a that integrates , , and logic with scientific inquiry and divine study, emphasizing the need for proficiency in Hebrew, Greek, and to access unadulterated sources of knowledge. Bacon argues that should serve without supplanting it, critiquing the compartmentalization of disciplines at universities like and as a source of intellectual fragmentation. Manuscripts of the Compendium Studii Philosophiae are scarce, with the primary one held in the (Cotton MS. Titus D. i), showing minor variations from the Opus Minus in its focus on pedagogical reform rather than papal advocacy; it includes unique passages on the hierarchy of —through , reason, and —positioning experimental methods as essential for bridging secular and sacred learning. This work underscores Bacon's lifelong push for interdisciplinary synthesis, written in the shadow of his earlier papal submissions but adapted for broader scholarly circulation.

Other Treatises and Commentaries

In addition to his major encyclopedic works, Roger Bacon composed several standalone treatises and commentaries that expanded on specific intellectual pursuits, particularly in , , and ethical . These texts, often preserved in medieval manuscripts, demonstrate Bacon's interdisciplinary approach, integrating practical applications with theological and scientific to support his vision of reformed . Manuscripts of these works survive in European libraries, such as those in and , with editions compiled from 14th- and 15th-century codices that reflect Bacon's evolving thought during his later years at . The Communia Mathematica, likely composed in the 1260s alongside Bacon's papal commissions, serves as a concise on the role and applications of across disciplines. In this work, Bacon argues for as a foundational tool for understanding nature, , and , emphasizing its utility in demonstrating truths in physics, astronomy, and metaphysics while cautioning against its misuse in speculative divorced from empirical validation. He draws on Aristotelian and Euclidean sources to illustrate how mathematical principles underpin scientific certainty, linking this to his broader oeuvre by reinforcing the experimental methods advocated in the . The survives in a single 14th-century manuscript (, Bodleian Library, MS Digby 76), edited in modern scholarship as part of studies on Bacon's mathematical metaphysics. Bacon's linguistic treatises include short pedagogical works on Greek and Hebrew grammar, aimed at facilitating scriptural study and philological accuracy among Latin scholars. The Greek Grammar, a brief manual from the 1240s or 1250s composed during his Paris period, outlines basic morphology, syntax, and pronunciation based on Byzantine sources, positioning Greek as essential for accessing original patristic texts and correcting Vulgate errors. Complementing this is a fragmentary Hebrew Grammar, likely from the same era, which introduces Semitic script, declensions, and vocabulary to aid biblical exegesis, reflecting Bacon's advocacy for polyglot learning as a theological imperative. These texts, edited from 13th-century manuscripts (e.g., Cambridge University Library, MS Ii.3.3), connect to his larger linguistic framework by promoting language as a tool for divine revelation, distinct from his more theoretical grammatical speculations. Bacon's commentaries on the Pseudo-Aristotelian , completed after 1280 in , represent his most extensive annotations on a non-original text, blending ethical, medical, and scientific . In this redaction and accompanying treatise, he annotates the Arabic-derived work on rulership, , and , praising its purported Aristotelian wisdom while critiquing astrological excesses and advocating experimental verification of its pharmacological advice. Bacon's notes emphasize moral governance through scientific , interpreting sections on statecraft as allegories for ecclesiastical reform, thus tying into his oeuvre's themes of wisdom's practical utility. Surviving in multiple 14th-century manuscripts (e.g., , MS Royal 12.G.vii), these commentaries were influential in medieval political thought, with modern editions highlighting their role in Bacon's late ethical synthesis.

Apocryphal and Disputed Attributions

Several works have been falsely or debatably attributed to Roger Bacon, complicating the establishment of his authentic canon and contributing to enduring myths about his contributions to science and technology. The Secretum Secretorum (Secret of Secrets), a pseudo-Aristotelian mirror-for-princes text, presents another case of disputed attribution. Bacon produced authentic annotations and a partial translation of the work during his time in Paris, emphasizing its alchemical and astrological elements as genuine Aristotelian wisdom. Yet, later medieval expansions, including additional sections on occult sciences and moral philosophy, have been erroneously ascribed to him, with scholars noting that these additions postdate Bacon's version and reflect later interpolations by anonymous compilers. Modern scholarship, particularly studies after 2020, has employed stylometric analysis—examining linguistic patterns, vocabulary frequency, and syntactic structures—and precise manuscript dating to debunk several such attributions. For instance, computational stylometry has revealed mismatches between disputed texts and Bacon's verified works like the Opus Majus, while radiocarbon and paleographic dating of manuscripts has placed some apocryphal items in the late 13th or early 14th century, beyond Bacon's active period. These methods have helped refine the canon, excluding at least a dozen pseudo-Baconian treatises on topics from astrology to mechanics. The proliferation of myths surrounding Bacon's inventiveness owes much to 16th-century printed editions and literary works that embellished his legacy. Editions of his writings, such as those by Johannes Hispalensis and later humanists, often incorporated apocryphal passages describing hypothetical devices, fueling legends of Bacon as a proto-inventor. Notably, Robert Greene's 1594 play Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay popularized tales of Bacon constructing a oracle and experimenting with aerial machines, ideas echoed in subsequent attributing flying contrivances to him—claims unsupported by his genuine texts, which instead advocate experimental verification without detailing such inventions.

Legacy and Influence

Impact on Medieval and Renaissance Thought

Roger Bacon's ideas on and exerted a notable influence on later medieval scholastics, particularly through his theory of the multiplication of , which linked to knowledge acquisition. John Duns Scotus drew upon Bacon's optical framework in developing his , integrating the propagation of as a mechanism for sensory and intellectual understanding, as evidenced in Scotus's discussions of how visual rays convey intelligible forms. Similarly, referenced Bacon's perspectivist in his nominalist , adapting the concept of to argue for direct realism in while critiquing excessive multiplication of entities, though the transmission was mediated through intermediate figures like Peter John Olivi. In the , Bacon's works circulated widely through manuscripts, facilitating their transmission to continental scholars and shaping advancements in astronomy. , a prominent French thinker, incorporated elements of Bacon's optical theories into his astronomical treatises, such as applying the multiplication of species to explain celestial visions and the of heavenly bodies, as seen in Oresme's De visione stellarum. This manuscript tradition, including copies of Bacon's and Perspectiva, connected English Franciscan thought to Parisian intellectual circles, influencing Oresme's qualitative physics and his diagrams of uniform . At Oxford, Bacon's emphasis on mathematics as a tool for natural philosophy laid foundational groundwork for the "calculators" school in the mid-14th century, which advanced through quantitative analysis of motion and qualities. Figures like and the Merton College scholars built on Bacon's integration of and , developing theorems on proportional speeds and intensive qualities that quantified change in physical systems. Bacon's advocacy for mathematical demonstration in empirical inquiry, as outlined in his Opus Tertium, directly inspired this group's departure from purely qualitative toward computable models. Bacon's optical and alchemical ideas extended into the , influencing polymaths who synthesized and art. Leonardo da Vinci consulted Bacon's Perspectiva for his studies on light, vision, and lens construction, applying perspectivist principles to anatomical drawings and optical devices like the . Through alchemical traditions, Bacon's views on transmutation and experimental manipulation of nature echoed in Leonardo's notebooks, where he explored metallic transformations and the unity of art and , though mediated by 15th-century intermediaries like the Italian translators of Bacon's works. Bacon's promotion of an experimental method also spread gradually, inspiring Renaissance empiricists to test hypotheses through observation and instruments.

Role in the History of Science

In the 19th century, Roger Bacon experienced a significant revival in scientific historiography, largely due to the efforts of William Whewell, who portrayed him as a pioneering advocate of the inductive method and experimental inquiry, dubbing him a precursor to modern science in his History of the Inductive Sciences (1837) and subsequent works. Whewell emphasized Bacon's calls for observation and experimentation over blind authority, positioning him as the "father" of empirical science amid a broader narrative of progress from medieval obscurity to Enlightenment rationality. This interpretation gained traction among Victorian scholars, who saw in Bacon's writings, particularly the Opus Majus, a proto-modern rejection of scholastic dogmatism. However, 20th- and early 21st-century scholarship has critiqued this view as anachronistic, arguing that it imposes modern categories on Bacon's medieval framework, where served theological ends rather than constituting a break from Aristotelian traditions. Historians like Amanda Power have highlighted how Whewell's revival reflected Victorian ideals more than Bacon's actual context, emphasizing instead his integration within 13th-century , influenced by figures like and . Studies from the mid-20th century onward, such as those in Roger Bacon and the Sciences (1991), stress that Bacon's "experimental science" (scientia experimentalis) was not a systematic but a subordinate tool for verifying divine order in nature, not a precursor to the . Recent scholarship (2020–2025) has further reassessed Bacon's experimentalism within medieval philosophy of nature, underscoring its limits compared to Grosseteste's more rigorous optical methodologies while affirming its innovative blend of observation and mathematics. For instance, analyses from the Magis Center portray Bacon as a forerunner of empirical habits, yet constrained by theological presuppositions, as seen in his De multiplicatione specierum. A 2021 study in Vivarium examines his Perspectiva as prioritizing mathematical demonstration over pure experimentation, aligning with Aristotelian frameworks rather than modern inductivism. Updates to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (last revised 2021) and contributions in The Philosophy and Science of Roger Bacon (2021) highlight these nuances, noting Bacon's emphasis on "virtus" and "species" in natural causation as advancing but not transcending medieval paradigms. In 2025, a new edition of Bacon's Moralis Philosophia was published, providing the original Latin text alongside an Italian translation, further evidencing continued engagement with his moral philosophy. In comparison to Grosseteste, Bacon's approach is seen as less systematic, building on but not surpassing his teacher's inductive optics. Debates persist on Bacon's alchemical pursuits as a bridge to early chemistry, with scholars crediting his descriptions of metallic transmutation and techniques in works like the Opus Tertium as contributing to practical , though his goals remained tied to production for longevity rather than purely chemical analysis. Regarding gunpowder, Bacon is recognized as one of the earliest Europeans to document its composition in the Opus Majus (c. 1267), likely drawing from Islamic sources, sparking discussions on whether he facilitated its adoption in , though evidence suggests he viewed it more as a speculative curiosity than a practical .

Depictions in Modern Culture

In 19th-century literature, Roger Bacon was frequently romanticized as a medieval and inventor, particularly associated with the discovery of , reflecting the era's fascination with him as a symbol of scientific precocity amid . This portrayal contributed to his image as a wizard-like figure who bridged magic and empirical knowledge, influencing narratives that contrasted medieval backwardness with modern ingenuity. In 20th-century works, Bacon's archetype as a mystical yet rational scientist gained prominence. Umberto Eco's novel (1980) features the Franciscan investigator , who studied under Bacon and whose deductive methods are influenced by Bacon's emphasis on observation and experimentation, positioning him as a precursor to modern detectives like . Similarly, James Blish's historical novel Doctor Mirabilis (1964) fictionalizes Bacon's life, highlighting his struggles against ecclesiastical authority while pursuing scientific , underscoring his role as "the wonderful doctor" in the transition from to . Plays and adaptations during this period, such as those inspired by Elizabethan dramas like Robert Greene's Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay, further emphasized the mystical scientist trope, often depicting Bacon conjuring mechanical wonders like the legendary to foretell the future or protect England. Modern media continues to evoke Bacon as an emblem of innovative genius. Documentaries on the , including productions like In Our Time (2017) and Terry Jones' Medieval Lives (2004), portray him as a pioneering advocate for experimental methods, often contrasting his forward-thinking ideas with the era's alchemical myths. In video games, such as the Shadow Hearts series (2001–2005), Bacon appears as the immortal "Doctor Mirabilis," a scholarly antagonist wielding arcane knowledge derived from his historical persona, blending his real emphasis on and with supernatural elements. Persistent myths attribute to Bacon inventions like spectacles, the , and even , stemming from his speculative writings in the Opus Majus on lenses and mechanical devices for navigation and flight; however, these claims are apocryphal, as he merely described potential applications rather than creating them, a distinction clarified in contemporary historical analyses. Popular histories, such as those examining his formula—derived from Chinese sources and recorded in to avoid misuse—debunk exaggerated inventor narratives, affirming instead his contributions to over gadgetry.

References

  1. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/roger-bacon/
  2. https://iep.utm.edu/roger-bacon/
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3705416/
  4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279382934_Roger_Bacon
  5. https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Bacon/
  6. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/humanities_etds/125/
  7. https://archive.org/details/cu31924021600790
  8. https://iep.utm.edu/roger-bacon-language/
  9. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004248182/B9789004248182-s008.pdf
  10. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/roger-bacon-and-the-defence-of-christendom/introduction/B1A37DC9E9794958FAD68EFBAB446883
  11. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095439918
  12. https://www.nature.com/articles/093405a0
  13. https://sourcebooks.web.fordham.edu/source/bacon2.asp
  14. https://medieval.ucdavis.edu/120B/Bacon.html
  15. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/354550
  16. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004444812/B9789004444812_s011.pdf
  17. https://www.academia.edu/75048562/Virtus_and_Species_in_the_Philosophy_of_Nature_of_Roger_Bacon_c_1220_1293_
  18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41975493
  19. https://direct.mit.edu/posc/article/25/6/719/15397/Roger-Bacon-c-1220-1292-and-his-System-of-Laws-of
  20. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1836074/
  21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24186446_Anatomy_of_the_eye_from_the_view_of_Ibn_Al-Haitham_965-1039_The_founder_of_modern_optics
  22. https://www.aip.org/library/roger-bacons-optics
  23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/227962
  24. https://www.examenapium.it/cs/biblio/Nothaft2017.pdf
  25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24396002
  26. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/JWCI24396002
  27. https://academic.oup.com/book/6790/chapter/150923086
  28. https://alchemywebsite.com/rbacon.html
  29. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-science/medieval-alchemy/4A620A00EF9694AB6BBC3E0BB2B3F723
  30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2178622
  31. https://www.sciencehistory.org/stories/magazine/holy-smoke/
  32. https://books.rsc.org/books/monograph/149/chapter/80602/Historical-Introduction
  33. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/ocw/mod/oucontent/view.php?id=87848&section=_unit6.3
  34. https://todayinsci.com/B/Bacon_Roger/BaconRoger-Quotations.htm
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307843851_Gunpowder_and_Arab_Firearms_in_Middle_Ages
  36. https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/ref/MG/I/MG-1.html
  37. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/11919/1/haileighrobertsonPHD.pdf
  38. https://academic.oup.com/book/10850/chapter/159036008
  39. https://www.academia.edu/105762653/Roger_Bacon_s_De_signis_a_missing_part_of_Opus_Maius_III_and_the_knowledge_of_languages_
  40. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/663294
  41. https://www.academia.edu/130184784/Roger_Bacon_s_De_signis_a_missing_part_of_Opus_Maius_III_and_the_knowledge_of_languages_
  42. https://ojs.tnkul.pl/index.php/rf/article/view/13241
  43. https://rogerbaconresearchsociety.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/bacon_opus-tertium-ch.-25-27.pdf
  44. https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=history_honors
  45. https://voynichrevisionist.com/roger-bacon-on-ciphers/
  46. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/opus-majus-of-roger-bacon/introduction/FFF26DAA4922D2D0BF1C152962EBBA0C
  47. https://archive.org/details/opusmajusofroger01baco
  48. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/13111b.htm
  49. https://ia802805.us.archive.org/9/items/partofopustertiu04baco/partofopustertiu04baco.pdf
  50. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/fr-rogeri-bacon-opera-quaedam-hactenus-inedita/opus-minus/CF88E5D5C159B341C2DA70E9042212CA
  51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321159853_Roger_Bacon%27s_Mathematics_Demonstrative_System_and_Metaphysics_in_the_Communia_Mathematica
  52. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-for-the-history-of-science/article/on-the-applicability-of-mathematics-to-nature-roger-bacon-and-his-predecessors/69A2BF50A907D94BE408D29693330881
  53. https://archive.org/details/greekgrammarofro00bacouoft
  54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2864785
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385756784_Doctor_Mirabilis_Roger_Bacon%27s_legend_and_legacy
  56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2853610
  57. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-science/change-and-motion/43272012C35F276DE849976581E78462
  58. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-science/logic/5E119E17817B8ACB466158E09DB3FCE5
  59. https://press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/577120.html
  60. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/68693/68693-h/68693-h.htm
  61. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Philosophy_of_the_Inductive_Sciences.html?id=EZ51EQAAQBAJ
  62. https://academic.oup.com/ehr/article/CXXI/492/657/501252
  63. https://www.magiscenter.com/blog/roger-bacon
  64. https://www.academia.edu/48983792/_The_First_of_All_Natural_Sciences_Roger_Bacon_on_Perspectiva_and_Human_Knowledge_Vivarium_59_3_2021_186_214
  65. https://www.sehepunkte.de/2025/06/39304.html
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362486985_%27Virtus%27_and_%27species%27_in_the_Philosophy_of_Nature_of_Roger_Bacon_c_1220-1293
  67. https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/history-did-you-know-general-science/roger-bacon-gunpowder-and-virgins
  68. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/the-name-of-the-rose/characters/william-of-baskerville
  69. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/review-of-politics/article/we-should-see-certain-things-yet-let-us-hope-and-believe-technology-sex-and-politics-in-mark-twains-connecticut-yankee/0D19CF1BC0E24F3A8D3A4A2DF4715534
  70. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b08m8z2w
  71. https://shadowhearts.fandom.com/wiki/Roger_Bacon
  72. https://www.jameslindlibrary.org/articles/roger-bacon-and-the-beginnings-of-experimental-science-in-britain/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.