Hubbry Logo
search button
Sign in
Second continuum hypothesis
Second continuum hypothesis
Comunity Hub
History
arrow-down
starMore
arrow-down
bob

Bob

Have a question related to this hub?

bob

Alice

Got something to say related to this hub?
Share it here.

#general is a chat channel to discuss anything related to the hub.
Hubbry Logo
search button
Sign in
Second continuum hypothesis
Community hub for the Wikipedia article
logoWikipedian hub
Welcome to the community hub built on top of the Second continuum hypothesis Wikipedia article. Here, you can discuss, collect, and organize anything related to Second continuum hypothesis. The purpose of...
Add your contribution
Second continuum hypothesis

The second continuum hypothesis, also called Luzin's hypothesis or Luzin's second continuum hypothesis, is the hypothesis that . It is the negation of a weakened form, , of the Continuum Hypothesis (CH). It was discussed by Nikolai Luzin in 1935, although he did not claim to be the first to postulate it.[note 1][2][3]: 157, 171 [4]: §3 [1]: 130–131  The statement may also be called Luzin's hypothesis.[2]

The second continuum hypothesis is independent of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with the Axiom of Choice (ZFC): its truth is consistent with ZFC since it is true in Cohen's model of ZFC with the negation of the Continuum Hypothesis;[5][6]: 109–110  its falsity is also consistent since it is contradicted by the Continuum Hypothesis, which follows from V=L. It is implied by Martin's Axiom together with the negation of the CH.[2]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ He didn't know who was the first: "Nous ne chercherons pas à donner le nom de l'auteur qui a conçu le premier la sériuse possibilité d'une telle hypothèse du continu..." [1]: 130 

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "Sur les ensembles analytiques nuls", Nicolas Lusin, Fundamenta Mathematicae, 25 (1935), pp. 109-131, doi:10.4064/fm-25-1-109-131.
  2. ^ a b c "Luzin hypothesis", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press, 2001 [1994]
  3. ^ "Introductory note to 1947 and 1964", Gregory H. Moore, pp. 154-175, in Kurt Gödel: Collected Works: Volume II: Publications 1938-1974, Kurt Gödel, eds. S. Feferman, John W. Dawson, Jr., Stephen C. Kleene, G. Moore, R. Solovay, and Jean van Heijenoort, eds., New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990, ISBN 0-19-503972-6.
  4. ^ "History of the Continuum in the 20th Century", Juris Steprāns, pp. 73-144, in Handbook of the History of Logic: Volume 6: Sets and Extensions in the Twentieth Century, eds. Dov M. Gabbay, Akihiro Kanamori, John Woods, Amsterdam, etc.: Elsevier, 2012, ISBN 978-0-444-51621-3.
  5. ^ Cohen, Paul J. (15 December 1963). "The independence of the Continuum Hypothesis, [part I]". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 50 (6): 1143–1148. Bibcode:1963PNAS...50.1143C. doi:10.1073/pnas.50.6.1143. JSTOR 71858. PMC 221287. PMID 16578557.
  6. ^ Cohen, Paul J. (15 January 1964). "The independence of the Continuum Hypothesis, [part] II". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 51 (1): 105–110. Bibcode:1964PNAS...51..105C. doi:10.1073/pnas.51.1.105. JSTOR 72252. PMC 300611. PMID 16591132.