Welcome to the community hub built on top of the The Structure of Magic Wikipedia article.
Here, you can discuss, collect, and organize anything related to The Structure of Magic. The
purpose of the hub is to connect people, foster deeper knowledge, and help improve
the root Wikipedia article.
The Structure of Magic is a two-volume book series (1975, 1976) by John Grinder and Richard Bandler, co-founders of neuro-linguistic programming (NLP), which is considered a pseudoscience.[1][2][3] The series explores how humans construct internal models of the world through language and nonverbal communication. They introduce a process of modeling, through which the authors sought to identify the replicable patterns of thought, language, and behavior modeled from "outstanding psychotherapists",[4] namely Fritz Perls (Gestalt therapy) and Virginia Satir, a family systems therapist. The foreword to the first volume was written by Virginia Satir and the introduction by Gregory Bateson.
According to psychiatrist[5] Robert S. Spitzer, after months of careful listening and transcribing Fritz Perls and Virginia Satir working with clients, Bandler began to incorporate the speech patterns and mannerisms of these therapists into his own communication.[6][7]The Structure of Magic presents a formal model of linguistic patterns intended to make those patterns explicit and learnable.[8]
^Thyer, Bruce A.; Pignotti, Monica G. (2015). Science and Pseudoscience in Social Work Practice. Springer Publishing Company. pp. 56–57, 165–167. ISBN978-0-8261-7769-8. As NLP became more popular, some research was conducted and reviews of such research have concluded that there is no scientific basis for its theories about representational systems and eye movements.
^Sharpley, Christopher F. (1987). "Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: Nonsupportive data or an untestable theory?". Journal of Counseling Psychology. 34 (1): 103–107. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.34.1.103. ISSN1939-2168.
^Witkowski, Tomasz (1 January 2010). "Thirty-Five Years of Research on Neuro-Linguistic Programming. NLP Research Data Base. State of the Art or Pseudoscientific Decoration?". Polish Psychological Bulletin. 41 (2). doi:10.2478/v10059-010-0008-0. All of this leaves me with an overwhelming impression that the analyzed base of scientific articles is treated just as theater decoration, being the background for the pseudoscientific farce which NLP appears to be. Using "scientific" attributes, which is so characteristic of pseudoscience, is manifested also in other aspects of NLP activities... My analysis leads undeniably to the statement that NLP represents pseudoscientific rubbish
^Passmore, J.; Rowson, T. S. (2019). "Neuro-linguistic-programming: a critical review of NLP research and the application of NLP in coaching". International Coaching Psychology Review. 14 (1): 57–69. doi:10.53841/bpsicpr.2019.14.1.57.
Barth, Joan C. (1980). "Book Review: Grinder, John and Bandler, Richard. The structure of magic II". Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 6 (1): 96. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1980.tb01711.x. ISSN0194-472X.
