Hubbry Logo
Neuro-linguistic programmingNeuro-linguistic programmingMain
Open search
Neuro-linguistic programming
Community hub
Neuro-linguistic programming
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Neuro-linguistic programming
Neuro-linguistic programming
Neuro-linguistic programming
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Neuro-linguistic programming
MeSHD020557
Neuro-linguistic
programming
Topics
Developers
Practitioners
Organisations

Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) is a pseudoscientific approach to communication, personal development, and psychotherapy that first appeared in Richard Bandler and John Grinder's book The Structure of Magic I (1975). NLP asserts a connection between neurological processes, language, and acquired behavioral patterns, and that these can be changed to achieve specific goals in life.[1][2] According to Bandler and Grinder, NLP can treat problems such as phobias, depression, tic disorders, psychosomatic illnesses, near-sightedness,[a] allergy, the common cold,[a] and learning disorders,[3][4] often in a single session. They also say that NLP can model the skills of exceptional people, allowing anyone to acquire them.[5][b]

NLP has been adopted by some hypnotherapists as well as by companies that run seminars marketed as leadership training to businesses and government agencies.[6][7]

No scientific evidence supports the claims made by NLP advocates, and it has been called a pseudoscience.[8][9][10] Scientific reviews have shown that NLP is based on outdated metaphors of the brain's inner workings that are inconsistent with current neurological theory, and that NLP contains numerous factual errors.[7][11] Reviews also found that research that favored NLP contained significant methodological flaws, and that three times as many studies of a much higher quality failed to reproduce the claims made by Bandler, Grinder, and other NLP practitioners.[9][10]

Early development

[edit]

According to Bandler and Grinder, NLP consists of a methodology termed modeling, plus a set of techniques that they derived from its initial applications.[12] They derived many of the fundamental techniques from the work of Virginia Satir, Milton Erickson and Fritz Perls.[13] Bandler and Grinder also drew upon the theories of Gregory Bateson, and Noam Chomsky (particularly transformational grammar).[14][15][16]

Bandler and Grinder say that their methodology can codify the structure inherent to the therapeutic "magic" as performed in therapy by Perls, Satir and Erickson, and indeed inherent to any complex human activity. From that codification, they say, the structure and its activity can be learned by others. Their 1975 book, The Structure of Magic I: A Book about Language and Therapy, is intended to be a codification of the therapeutic techniques of Perls and Satir.[14]

Bandler and Grinder say that they used their own process of modeling to model Virginia Satir so they could produce what they termed the Meta-Model, a model for gathering information and challenging a client's language and underlying thinking.[14][17] They say that by challenging linguistic distortions, specifying generalizations, and recovering deleted information in the client's statements, the transformational grammar concept of surface structure yields a more complete representation of the underlying deep structure and therefore has therapeutic benefit.[18][19] Also derived from Satir were anchoring, future pacing and representational systems.[20]

In contrast, the Milton-Model—a model of the purportedly hypnotic language of Milton Erickson—was described by Bandler and Grinder as "artfully vague" and metaphoric.[21] The Milton-Model is used in combination with the Meta-Model as a softener, to induce "trance" and to deliver indirect therapeutic suggestion.[22]

Psychologist Jean Mercer writes that Chomsky's theories "appear to be irrelevant" to NLP.[23] Linguist Karen Stollznow describes Bandler's and Grinder's reference to such experts as namedropping. Other than Satir, the people they cite as influences did not collaborate with Bandler or Grinder. Chomsky himself has no association with NLP, with his work being theoretical in nature and having no therapeutic element. Stollznow writes, "[o]ther than borrowing terminology, NLP does not bear authentic resemblance to any of Chomsky's theories or philosophies—linguistic, cognitive or political."[15]

According to André Muller Weitzenhoffer, a researcher in the field of hypnosis, "the major weakness of Bandler and Grinder's linguistic analysis is that so much of it is built upon untested hypotheses and is supported by totally inadequate data."[24] Weitzenhoffer adds that Bandler and Grinder misuse formal logic and mathematics,[25] redefine or misunderstand terms from the linguistics lexicon (e.g., nominalization),[c] create a scientific façade by needlessly complicating Ericksonian concepts with unfounded claims,[d] make factual errors,[e] and disregard or confuse concepts central to the Ericksonian approach.[f]

More recently, Bandler has stated, "NLP is based on finding out what works and formalizing it. In order to formalize patterns I utilized everything from linguistics to holography ... The models that constitute NLP are all formal models based on mathematical, logical principles such as predicate calculus and the mathematical equations underlying holography."[26] There is no mention of the mathematics of holography nor of holography in general in Spitzer's,[20] or Grinder's[27] account of the development of NLP.

On the matter of the development of NLP, Grinder recollects:

My memories about what we thought at the time of discovery (with respect to the classic code we developed—that is, the years 1973 through 1978) are that we were quite explicit that we were out to overthrow a paradigm and that, for example, I, for one, found it very useful to plan this campaign using in part as a guide the excellent work of Thomas Kuhn (The Structure of Scientific Revolutions) in which he detailed some of the conditions which historically have obtained in the midst of paradigm shifts. For example, I believe it was very useful that neither one of us were qualified in the field we first went after—psychology and in particular, its therapeutic application; this being one of the conditions which Kuhn identified in his historical study of paradigm shifts.[28]

The philosopher Robert Todd Carroll responded that Grinder has not understood Kuhn's text on the history and philosophy of science, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Carroll replies: (a) individual scientists never have nor are they ever able to create paradigm shifts volitionally and Kuhn does not suggest otherwise; (b) Kuhn's text does not contain the idea that being unqualified in a field of science is a prerequisite to producing a result that necessitates a paradigm shift in that field and (c) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is foremost a work of history and not an instructive text on creating paradigm shifts and such a text is not possible—extraordinary discovery is not a formulaic procedure. Carroll explains that a paradigm shift is not a planned activity, rather it is an outcome of scientific effort within the dominant paradigm that produces data that cannot be adequately accounted for within the current paradigm—hence a paradigm shift, i.e. the adoption of a new paradigm. In developing NLP, Bandler and Grinder were not responding to a paradigmatic crisis in psychology nor did they produce any data that caused a paradigmatic crisis in psychology. There is no sense in which Bandler and Grinder caused or participated in a paradigm shift. "What did Grinder and Bandler do that makes it impossible to continue doing psychology ... without accepting their ideas? Nothing," argues Carroll.[29]

Commercialization and evaluation

[edit]

By the late 1970s, the human potential movement had developed into an industry and provided a market for some NLP ideas. At the center of this growth was the Esalen Institute at Big Sur, California. Perls had led numerous Gestalt therapy seminars at Esalen. Satir was an early leader and Bateson was a guest teacher. Bandler and Grinder have said that in addition to being a therapeutic method, NLP was also a study of communication and began marketing it as a business tool, writing that, "if any human being can do anything, so can you."[17] After 150 students paid $1,000 each for a ten-day workshop in Santa Cruz, California, Bandler and Grinder gave up academic writing and started producing popular books from seminar transcripts, such as Frogs into Princes, which sold more than 270,000 copies. According to court documents relating to an intellectual property dispute between Bandler and Grinder, Bandler made more than $800,000 in 1980 from workshop and book sales.[17]

A community of psychotherapists and students began to form around Bandler and Grinder's initial works, leading to the growth and spread of NLP as a theory and practice.[30] For example, Tony Robbins trained with Grinder and utilized a few ideas from NLP as part of his own self-help and motivational speaking programmes.[31] Bandler led several unsuccessful efforts to exclude other parties from using NLP.[citation needed] Meanwhile, the rising number of practitioners and theorists led NLP to become even less uniform than it was at its foundation.[15] Prior to the decline of NLP, scientific researchers began testing its theoretical underpinnings empirically, with research indicating a lack of empirical support for NLP's essential theories.[10] The 1990s were characterized by fewer scientific studies evaluating the methods of NLP than the previous decade. Tomasz Witkowski attributes this to a declining interest in the debate as the result of a lack of empirical support for NLP from its proponents.[10]

Main components and core concepts

[edit]

NLP can be understood in terms of three broad components: subjectivity, consciousness, and learning.

According to Bandler and Grinder, people experience the world subjectively, creating internal representations of their experiences. These representations involve the five senses and language. In other words, our conscious experiences take the form of sights, sounds, feelings, smells, and tastes. When we imagine something, recall an event, or think about the future, we utilize these same sensory systems within our minds.[32][g] Furthermore it is stated that these subjective representations of experience have a discernible structure, a pattern.[33]

Bandler and Grinder assert that behavior (both our own and others') can be understood through these sensory-based internal representations. Behavior here includes verbal and non-verbal communication, as well as effective or adaptive behaviors and less helpful or "pathological" ones.[h][34] They also assert that behavior in both the self and other people can be modified by manipulating these sense-based subjective representations.[35][i]

NLP posits that consciousness can be divided into conscious and unconscious components. The part of our internal representations operating outside our direct awareness is referred to as the "unconscious mind".[j]

Finally, NLP uses a method of learning called "modeling", designed to replicate expertise in any field. According to Bandler and Grinder, by analyzing the sequence of sensory and linguistic representations used by an expert while performing a skill, it's possible to create a mental model that can be learned by others.[36]

Techniques or set of practices

[edit]
Further information: Methods of neuro-linguistic programming
An "eye accessing cue chart" as it appears as an example in Bandler & Grinder's Frogs into Princes (1979). The six directions represent "visual construct", "visual recall", "auditory construct", "auditory recall", "kinesthetic" and "auditory internal dialogue".

According to one study by Steinbach,[37] a classic interaction in NLP can be understood in terms of several major stages including establishing rapport, gleaning information about a problem mental state and desired goals, using specific tools and techniques to make interventions, and integrating proposed changes into the client's life. The entire process is guided by the non-verbal responses of the client.[37] The first is the act of establishing and maintaining rapport between the practitioner and the client which is achieved through pacing and leading the verbal (e.g., sensory predicates[further explanation needed] and keywords) and non-verbal behavior (e.g., matching and mirroring non-verbal behavior, or responding to eye movements) of the client.[38]

Once rapport is established, the practitioner may gather information about the client's present state as well as help the client define a desired state or goal for the interaction. The practitioner pays attention to the verbal and non-verbal responses as the client defines the present state and desired state and any resources that may be required to bridge the gap.[37] The client is typically encouraged to consider the consequences of the desired outcome, and how they may affect his or her personal or professional life and relationships, taking into account any positive intentions of any problems that may arise.[37] The practitioner thereafter assists the client in achieving the desired outcomes by using certain tools and techniques to change internal representations and responses to stimuli in the world.[39][40] Finally, the practitioner helps the client to mentally rehearse and integrate the changes into his or her life.[37] For example, the client may be asked to envision what it is like having already achieved the outcome.

According to Stollznow, "NLP also involves fringe discourse analysis and 'practical' guidelines for 'improved' communication. For example, one text asserts 'when you adopt the "but" word, people will remember what you said afterwards. With the "and" word, people remember what you said before and after.'"[15]

Applications

[edit]

Alternative medicine

[edit]

NLP has been promoted as being able to treat a variety of diseases including Parkinson's disease, HIV/AIDS and cancer.[41] Such claims have no supporting medical evidence.[41] People who use NLP as a form of treatment risk serious adverse health consequences as it can delay the provision of effective medical care.[41]

Psychotherapeutic

[edit]

Early books about NLP had a psychotherapeutic focus given that the early models were psychotherapists. As an approach to psychotherapy, NLP shares similar core assumptions and foundations in common with some contemporary brief and systemic practices,[42][43][44] such as solution focused brief therapy.[45][46] NLP has also been acknowledged as having influenced these practices[44][47] with its reframing techniques[48] which seeks to achieve behavior change by shifting its context or meaning,[49] for example, by finding the positive connotation of a thought or behavior.

The two main therapeutic uses of NLP are, firstly, as an adjunct by therapists[50] practicing in other therapeutic disciplines and, secondly, as a specific therapy called Neurolinguistic Psychotherapy.[51]

According to Stollznow, "Bandler and Grinder's infamous Frogs into Princes and their other books boast that NLP is a cure-all that treats a broad range of physical and mental conditions and learning difficulties, including epilepsy, myopia and dyslexia. With its promises to cure schizophrenia, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, and its dismissal of psychiatric illnesses as psychosomatic, NLP shares similarities with Scientology and the Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR)."[15] A systematic review of experimental studies by Sturt et al. (2012) concluded that "there is little evidence that NLP interventions improve health-related outcomes."[52] In his review of NLP, Stephen Briers writes, "NLP is not really a cohesive therapy but a ragbag of different techniques without a particularly clear theoretical basis ... [and its] evidence base is virtually non-existent."[53] Eisner writes, "NLP appears to be a superficial and gimmicky approach to dealing with mental health problems. Unfortunately, NLP appears to be the first in a long line of mass marketing seminars that purport to virtually cure any mental disorder ... it appears that NLP has no empirical or scientific support as to the underlying tenets of its theory or clinical effectiveness. What remains is a mass-marketed serving of psychopablum."[54]

André Muller Weitzenhoffer—a friend and peer of Milton Erickson—wrote, "Has NLP really abstracted and explicated the essence of successful therapy and provided everyone with the means to be another Whittaker, Virginia Satir, or Erickson? ... [NLP's] failure to do this is evident because today there is no multitude of their equals, not even another Whittaker, Virginia Satir, or Erickson. Ten years should have been sufficient time for this to happen. In this light, I cannot take NLP seriously ... [NLP's] contributions to our understanding and use of Ericksonian techniques are equally dubious. Patterns I and II are poorly written works that were an overambitious, pretentious effort to reduce hypnotism to a magic of words."[55]

Clinical psychologist Stephen Briers questions the value of the NLP maxim—a presupposition in NLP jargon—"there is no failure, only feedback".[56] Briers argues that the denial of the existence of failure diminishes its instructive value. He offers Walt Disney, Isaac Newton and J.K. Rowling as three examples of unambiguous acknowledged personal failure that served as an impetus to great success. According to Briers, it was "the crash-and-burn type of failure, not the sanitised NLP Failure Lite, i.e. the failure-that-isn't really-failure sort of failure" that propelled these individuals to success. Briers contends that adherence to the maxim leads to self-deprecation. According to Briers, personal endeavour is a product of invested values and aspirations and the dismissal of personally significant failure as mere feedback effectively denigrates what one values. Briers writes, "Sometimes we need to accept and mourn the death of our dreams, not just casually dismiss them as inconsequential." Briers also contends that the NLP maxim is narcissistic, self-centered and divorced from notions of moral responsibility.[57]

Other uses

[edit]

Although the original core techniques of NLP were therapeutic in orientation their generic nature enabled them to be applied to other fields. These applications include persuasion,[58] sales,[59] negotiation,[60] management training,[61] sports,[62] teaching, coaching, team building, public speaking, and in the process of hiring employees.[63]

Scientific criticism

[edit]

In the early 1980s, NLP was advertised as an important advance in psychotherapy and counseling, and attracted some interest in counseling research and clinical psychology. However, as controlled trials failed to show any benefit from NLP and its advocates made increasingly dubious claims, scientific interest in NLP faded.[64][65]

Numerous literature reviews and meta-analyses have failed to show evidence for NLP's assumptions or effectiveness as a therapeutic method.[k] While some NLP practitioners have argued that the lack of empirical support is due to insufficient research which tests NLP,[l] the consensus scientific opinion is that NLP is pseudoscience[m][n] and that attempts to dismiss the research findings based on these arguments "[constitute]s an admission that NLP does not have an evidence base and that NLP practitioners are seeking a post-hoc credibility."[83][84]

Surveys in the academic community have shown NLP to be widely discredited among scientists.[o] Among the reasons for considering NLP a pseudoscience are that evidence in favor of it is limited to anecdotes and personal testimony[19][88] that it is not informed by scientific understanding of neuroscience and linguistics,[19][89] and that the name "neuro-linguistic programming" uses jargon words to impress readers and obfuscate ideas, whereas NLP itself does not relate any phenomena to neural structures and has nothing in common with linguistics or programming.[10][90][91][73][p] In education, NLP has been used as a key example of pseudoscience.[79][80][81]

As a quasi-religion

[edit]

Sociologists and anthropologists have categorized NLP as a quasi-religion belonging to the New Age and/or Human Potential Movements.[93]

Medical anthropologist Jean M. Langford categorizes NLP as a form of folk magic; that is to say, a practice with symbolic efficacy—as opposed to physical efficacy—that is able to effect change through nonspecific effects (e.g., placebo). To Langford, NLP is akin to a syncretic folk religion "that attempts to wed the magic of folk practice to the science of professional medicine".[94]

Bandler and Grinder were influenced by the shamanism described in the books of Carlos Castaneda.[95] Concepts like "double induction"[citation needed] and "stopping the world", central to NLP modeling, were incorporated from these influences.[96]

Some theorists characterize NLP as a type of "psycho-shamanism", and its focus on modeling has been compared to ritual practices in certain syncretic religions.[88][97] The emphasis on lineage from an NLP guru has also been likened to similar concepts in some Eastern religions.[98] Aupers, Houtman, and Bovbjerg identify NLP as a New Age "psycho-religion".[99] Bovbjerg argues that New Age movements center on a transcendent "other".[100] While monotheistic religions seek communion with a divine being, this focus shifts inward in these movements, with the "other" becoming the unconscious self. Bovbjerg posits that this emphasis on the unconscious and its hidden potential underlies NLP techniques promoting self-perfection through ongoing transformation.[100]

Bovbjerg's secular critique echoes the conservative Christian perspective, as exemplified by David Jeremiah. He argues that NLP's emphasis on self-transformation and internal power conflicts with the Christian belief in salvation through divine grace.[101]

[edit]

Founding, initial disputes, and settlement (1979–1981)

[edit]

In 1979, Richard Bandler and John Grinder established the Society of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) to manage commercial applications of NLP, including training, materials, and certification. The founding agreement conferred exclusive rights to profit from NLP training and certification upon Bandler's corporate entity, Not Ltd. Around November 1980, Bandler and Grinder had ceased collaboration for undisclosed reasons.[17]

On September 25, 1981, Bandler filed suit against Grinder's corporate entity, Unlimited Ltd., in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Cruz seeking injunctive relief and damages arising from Grinder's NLP-related commercial activities; the Court issued a judgment in Bandler's favor on October 29, 1981.[102] The subsequent settlement agreement granted Grinder a 10-year license to conduct NLP seminars, offer NLP certification, and utilize the NLP name, subject to royalty payments to Bandler.[103]

Further litigation and consequences (1996–2000)

[edit]

Bandler commenced further civil actions against Unlimited Ltd., various figures within the NLP community, and 200 initially unnamed defendants in July 1996 and January 1997. Bandler alleged violations of the initial settlement terms by Grinder and sought damages of no less than US$10,000,000.00 from each defendant.[103]

In February 2000, the Court ruled against Bandler. The judgment asserted that Bandler had misrepresented his exclusive ownership of NLP intellectual property and sole authority over Society of NLP membership and certification.[104][105]

Trademark revocation (1997)

[edit]

In December 1997, a separate civil proceeding initiated by Tony Clarkson resulted in the revocation of Bandler's UK trademark of NLP. The Court ruled in Clarkson's favor.[106][107]

Resolution and legacy (2000)

[edit]

Bandler and Grinder reached a settlement in late 2000, acknowledging their status as co-creators and co-founders of NLP and committing to refrain from disparaging one another's NLP-related endeavors.[108]

Due to these disputes and settlements, the terms "NLP" and "neuro-linguistic programming" remain in the public domain. No single party holds exclusive rights, and there are no restrictions on offering NLP certifications.[109][110][111][112][113]

The designations "NLP" and "neuro-linguistic programming" are not owned, trademarked, or subject to centralized regulation.[114][115][112][113] Consequently, there are no restrictions on individuals self-identifying as "NLP master practitioners" or "NLP master trainers".[83] This decentralization has led to numerous certifying associations.

Decentralization and criticism

[edit]

This lack of centralized control means there is no single standard for NLP practice or training. Practitioners can market their own methodologies, leading to inconsistencies within the field.[29][116] This has been a source of criticism, highlighted by an incident in 2009 where a British television presenter registered his cat[117] with the British Board of Neuro Linguistic Programming (BBNLP), demonstrating the organization's lax credentialing. Critics like Karen Stollznow find irony in the initial legal battles between Bandler and Grinder, considering their failure to apply their own NLP principles to resolve their conflict.[15] Others, such as Grant Devilly, characterize NLP associations as "granfalloons"—a term implying a lack of unifying principles or a shared sense of purpose.[64]

See also

[edit]

Notable practitioners

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Neuro-linguistic programming

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) is a set of principles and techniques aimed at enhancing , confidence, communication skills, and behavioral change by modeling the thought patterns and strategies of successful individuals. Developed in the 1970s by , a student of and , and , a linguistics professor, at the , NLP draws from the practices of influential therapists such as , , and Milton Erickson to create practical tools for personal and professional development. It posits that neurological processes, , and behavioral patterns learned through experience can be altered to achieve specific outcomes, often described as a "user's manual for the mind." The foundational premise of NLP is the idea that people operate through representational systems—primarily visual, auditory, kinesthetic, olfactory, and gustatory— which influence how they perceive and interact with the world. Bandler and Grinder's approach emphasized modeling excellence, where the strategies of high achievers are reverse-engineered and taught to others, leading to techniques like anchoring (associating a stimulus with a desired emotional state) and reframing (altering the context of a situation to change its meaning). Early works, such as their 1975 book The Structure of Magic, outlined these meta-models for therapy, focusing on how language shapes subjective experience and can be used to uncover and modify limiting beliefs. NLP has been applied in diverse fields, including , business coaching, , and , to address issues like anxiety, phobias, and performance enhancement. Proponents claim it facilitates rapid change by aligning internal representations with external goals, with organizations like the promoting its use for wellbeing and organizational outcomes. However, scientific evaluations have been largely critical, with systematic reviews finding insufficient to support its efficacy in health or therapeutic contexts, often labeling it as pseudoscientific due to methodological flaws in studies and lack of inclusion in mainstream curricula. Despite this, NLP remains popular in and commercial training programs worldwide.

History

Origins and Founders

Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) was co-founded by , , and Frank Pucelik in the early 1970s at the (UCSC). Bandler, a student who had studied , , , and , earning a BA in philosophy and psychology from UCSC in 1973 and an MA in psychology in 1975, developed an interest in through editing transcripts of sessions. Pucelik, an early collaborator, worked with Bandler on initial Gestalt groups. Grinder, who held a PhD in from the in 1971 and served as an assistant professor of linguistics at UCSC, brought expertise in and advanced language analysis to the collaboration. Their partnership combined Bandler's background in computational modeling and psychological processes with Grinder's linguistic precision, laying the groundwork for NLP's approach to . The collaboration began around 1972 when Bandler, then leading informal seminars as an undergraduate, invited Grinder to observe and analyze the sessions. By 1973, they expanded their work by transcribing and studying workshops led by , and in 1974, with the introduction to hypnotherapist Milton Erickson facilitated by anthropologist , they intensified their joint efforts. This period from 1972 to 1975 marked the core development phase, where Bandler and Grinder formed a study group in Santa Cruz, meeting in a communal house on to refine their ideas through practical experimentation and discussion. The Santa Cruz NLP group, comprising students and early collaborators, facilitated the initial testing of these concepts in workshop settings, evolving from Bandler's gestalt groups into structured NLP explorations. Central to NLP's origins was the founders' method of modeling exceptional therapists: , the developer of , for his direct confrontation techniques; Virginia Satir, a pioneer in family systems therapy, for her congruent communication patterns; and , a master hypnotherapist, for his indirect suggestion strategies. This modeling process, conducted between 1972 and 1974, involved observing the therapists as they worked with clients, documenting common patterns in their words and phrases, tone of voice, speed and rhythm of speaking, motions, postures, and gestures. Through interviews, reviews of tapes and transcripts, they identified strategies describable step-by-step in sensory terms—what the therapists saw, heard, and felt during sessions—including what they attended to in clients and their internal experiences. Although each therapist employed unique approaches, shared linguistic structures, thought patterns, and behaviors emerged. These models were tested by the founders applying them personally and teaching them to others, confirming their validity when similar therapeutic outcomes could be replicated. The first major publications emerged in 1975, codifying these efforts: The Structure of Magic, Vol. 1: A Book About and , which introduced the Meta-Model for unpacking linguistic distortions in therapy, and Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of , M.D., Vol. 1, analyzing Erickson's language for inducing states. These works, published by Science and Behavior Books, formalized NLP's foundational principles and were followed by workshops where Bandler and Grinder taught the emerging framework to small groups in Santa Cruz, attracting initial interest from students and professionals.

Early Development and Influences

Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) drew heavily from , particularly Noam Chomsky's , which posits that surface-level structures derive from deeper, universal generative rules, influencing NLP's analysis of how shapes thought and experience. This framework informed the field's emphasis on unpacking linguistic patterns to reveal underlying mental models. Additionally, simplified neurological concepts from the , portraying the as an information-processing system akin to early computers, contributed to NLP's representational , viewing through sensory modalities like visual, auditory, and kinesthetic channels. Cybernetics, especially Gregory Bateson's work on and the "ecology of mind," profoundly shaped NLP's holistic approach to human interaction, emphasizing patterns, feedback loops, and the interconnectedness of behavior, language, and environment. Bateson, who authored the foreword to NLP's foundational text, encouraged founders and to integrate these ideas during their collaborations in the mid-1970s. A core innovation emerged in the meta-model, detailed in The Structure of Magic: A Book About and (Volume 1, 1975), which provides a systematic tool for challenging linguistic deletions (omitted information), distortions (misrepresentations), and generalizations (overbroad statements) to recover precise experiential details. This model, rooted in , enables therapists to probe clients' internal representations, fostering clarity and behavioral change by reversing surface-level language back to its generative origins. Between 1976 and 1980, NLP evolved through key publications and collaborations; Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of , M.D. (Volumes 1 and 2, 1975–1976) extended the meta-model to hypnotic language, while Frogs into Princes: Neuro Linguistic Programming (1979), a transcript of early workshops, popularized practical applications for audiences beyond therapy. Early associates Robert Dilts and Judith DeLozier joined in the late 1970s, contributing to refinements like neurological levels and cultural modeling, expanding the field's theoretical scope. By the early 1980s, NLP shifted from its initial focus on modeling therapeutic excellence—such as the practices of and —to broader , incorporating and communication skills for non-clinical settings like business and education. This evolution reflected growing workshop demand and internal refinements, including the establishment of certification trainings to standardize practitioner skills amid expanding interest.

Commercialization and Expansion

Following the initial development of neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) in the 1970s, Richard Bandler and John Grinder transitioned the approach from academic exploration to commercial enterprise through public seminars and publications. Starting in the late 1970s, they conducted workshops that attracted psychotherapists and students, with transcripts from these sessions forming the basis of their 1979 book Frogs into Princes: Neuro Linguistic Programming, published by Real People Press, which popularized NLP techniques for personal change. In 1978, Bandler and Grinder founded the Society of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (SNLP) as the original certifying body for NLP training, marking the formal establishment of structured commercial offerings. This shift enabled the dissemination of NLP via book deals and seminar fees, fostering a growing community of practitioners. The global expansion of NLP accelerated in the 1980s and 1990s, with the creation of regional societies and standardized programs. In , the Association for Neuro Linguistic Programming (ANLP) was established in the in 1985 as a member-owned organization to promote ethical standards and , later evolving into an international body hosting annual conferences. Similar organizations emerged elsewhere, such as the International Association for Neuro-Linguistic Programming (IANLP) in 1983, focusing on trainer across continents. In Asia, the NLP Association of (NLPAA) was founded in 2004 to uphold training standards and build a regional community. levels, including Practitioner (basic skills in modeling and rapport), Master Practitioner (advanced pattern interruption), and Trainer, became widespread, ensuring consistent global dissemination through licensed programs. Key figures like Leslie Cameron-Bandler, who developed meta-programs and contributed to early training materials, and Steve Andreas, who co-authored influential texts and refined techniques for broader application, played pivotal roles in this scaling. Economically, NLP grew into a multifaceted industry sustained by books, audio recordings, seminars, and later digital products, with training organizations generating revenue through fees and materials. By the , NLP had permeated sectors like sales and management training, contributing to the broader self-improvement market. Recent trends, particularly post-2020 amid the , have emphasized digital adaptations, with platforms like NLP Comprehensive offering exclusive online video courses for practitioner to accommodate remote learning and global . This shift has sustained expansion by integrating virtual workshops and e-resources, attracting international adopters in diverse fields.

Core Concepts

Presuppositions and Principles

Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) is built upon a set of presuppositions that serve as foundational assumptions guiding its approach to human experience and change. These presuppositions, modeled from successful therapists and , emphasize subjective perception and behavioral patterns rather than objective reality. A core presupposition is that "the map is not the territory," originating from Alfred Korzybski's work in , which posits that individuals respond to their internal representations of reality rather than reality itself, highlighting the subjective nature of experience. Another key presupposition is that every behavior has a positive intention at some level, meaning actions, even those deemed problematic, are driven by an underlying desire for or protection, originating from the . Additionally, the presupposition of flexibility asserts that the individual or system with the greatest behavioral flexibility exerts the most influence and achieves success, as varied responses increase the likelihood of effective outcomes. NLP principles extend these presuppositions into practical frameworks for goal-setting and change. Outcome framing, a central principle, involves creating well-formed outcomes that are positively stated, specific, under the individual's control, contextually appropriate, ecologically balanced (considering broader impacts), and sensory-based for measurability. This approach ensures goals align with personal resources and values, promoting achievable and sustainable results. The neurological levels model, developed by Robert Dilts, provides a hierarchical framework for understanding human functioning and intervention points in NLP. Influenced by Gregory Bateson's logical levels of learning, it consists of six layers: environment (external context), behavior (actions), capabilities (skills and strategies), beliefs and values (motivations and principles), identity (sense of self), and spirit or mission (purpose beyond the individual). Changes at higher levels cascade to influence lower ones, emphasizing holistic alignment for . Central to NLP is the emphasis on subjectivity, where individual perceptions and internal models shape one's reality, underscoring that experiences are constructed through sensory filters and neurological processes unique to each person. Unlike traditional , which often prioritizes content—such as specific thoughts or events—NLP focuses on process, examining the underlying structures of how experiences are organized and modified to facilitate rapid change.

Representational Systems and Modeling

In neuro-linguistic programming (NLP), representational systems refer to the primary sensory modalities through which individuals internally represent and process their experiences of the world. These systems, often abbreviated as VAKOG, encompass visual (sight), auditory (hearing), kinesthetic (touch and internal feelings), olfactory (smell), and gustatory (). According to Bandler and Grinder, humans construct internal models of reality using these modalities, with and serving as surface indicators of the underlying sensory representations; for instance, predicates like "I see what you mean" suggest a visual preference, while "That rings a bell" indicates an auditory one. The theory posits that these systems form the basis of subjective experience, filtered through neurological processes that prioritize certain modalities over others. To detect an individual's preferred representational , NLP practitioners observe eye-accessing cues, which are subtle eye movements correlated with internal sensory access. For example, upward eye movements typically indicate visual processing (left for remembered images, right for constructed ones), lateral movements suggest auditory recall or construction, and downward shifts point to kinesthetic or auditory digital (self-talk) modes; olfactory and gustatory cues are less commonly emphasized but may involve similar patterns. Bandler and Grinder described these cues as observable during targeted questioning, such as asking someone to recall a visual versus a tactile sensation, allowing to the dominant mode for enhanced communication. This detection supports the core NLP that aligning with a person's preferred builds and facilitates influence. Central to NLP is the modeling process, which involves observing effective practitioners to identify and extract step-by-step strategies through detailed analysis of their sensory-based thinking and behaviors, including what they see, hear, and feel; their language patterns, tone of voice, speaking speed and rhythm; and their gestures, postures, and attentional focus during interactions. This operationalizes the approach of deconstructing excellence into replicable structures by gathering data via interviews, session observations, and reviews of tapes and transcripts to map verbal and non-verbal patterns. The process includes coding these behaviors across multiple perspectives (e.g., first-person enactment) and designing interventions to transfer the modeled structure. A key framework is model (Test-Operate-Test-Exit), a cybernetic loop where one tests against a , operates via sensory operations, re-tests, and exits upon success, applied to elicit and replicate internal processes like in techniques or focus in athletic performance. For instance, modeling a top salesperson might involve tracing their visual strategy for visualizing client needs alongside kinesthetic cues for building trust, then coding these into replicable steps for others. The theory posits that individuals have a preferred representational system or systems (e.g., visual over kinesthetic) that can be identified and leveraged, with preferences potentially varying by context or situation.

Meta-Model and Language Patterns

The Meta-Model in neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) is a linguistic framework developed by and to analyze and clarify the surface structure of , revealing underlying deletions, generalizations, and distortions that limit effective communication and self-understanding. This model draws from transformational-generative grammar, particularly the work of , to identify how maps experience imprecisely, and it employs specific questions to recover the "deep structure" of thought. Deletions occur when essential information is omitted, such as unspecified nouns or verbs; for instance, the question "Who, specifically?" challenges vague references like "They don't like me." Generalizations involve overbroad statements, addressed by queries like "Always?" or "Never?" to probe universal quantifiers such as "Everyone fails at this." Distortions encompass misinterpretations of reality, including nominalizations (abstracting processes into static nouns, e.g., questioning "What's happening in your relationship?" instead of treating it as fixed), cause-effect linkages (e.g., "How, exactly, does that cause this?" for claims like "Stress causes my headaches"), and complex equivalence (equating unrelated events, e.g., "How does being late mean he doesn't care?"). In contrast, the Milton Model represents the inverse approach, utilizing vague and ambiguous language patterns derived from the hypnotic techniques of psychiatrist to bypass conscious resistance and induce trance states or subtle suggestions. Bandler and Grinder formalized these patterns by reverse-engineering Erickson's indirect speech, incorporating elements like presuppositions (assumed truths embedded in sentences, e.g., "As you continue relaxing deeper..."), embedded commands (hidden directives within larger phrases, such as "You might feel more confident now"), and nominalizations to create artfully vague descriptions that allow the listener to fill in personal meanings. This model evolved from Grinder's linguistic expertise in analyzing Erickson's therapeutic dialogues, transforming abstract grammatical insights into practical hypnotic tools for influencing processes without direct confrontation. These models find application in within NLP, where the Meta-Model serves to challenge limiting beliefs by expanding vague expressions into precise, empowering ones, thereby enhancing clarity and problem-solving in or . Conversely, the Milton Model facilitates and suggestion, such as inducing relaxation or reframing perspectives through hypnotic pacing and leading, often in contexts like or . Key patterns like cause-effect and complex equivalence bridge the models, allowing practitioners to detect distortions in the Meta-Model while deploying them ambiguously in the Milton Model to guide behavioral change.

Techniques and Practices

Anchoring and Reframing

Anchoring is a core technique in neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) that involves associating a specific stimulus, such as a touch, word, tone, or gesture, with a particular emotional or physiological state to trigger it on demand. Developed by and , anchoring draws parallels to , where a neutral stimulus is paired with an unconditioned response to create a conditioned reaction, allowing practitioners to access resourceful states like or calmness reliably. This method is applied in therapeutic contexts to manage emotions, replace unwanted responses, or enhance performance by eliciting past experiences or internal resources. The process of setting an anchor typically follows structured steps: first, elicit the desired state by having the individual vividly recall or imagine it; second, identify the peak intensity of that state through physiological cues; third, apply a unique, neutral stimulus (the anchor) precisely at the peak to form the association; fourth, break the state by engaging in a neutral activity; and finally, test the anchor by reapplying the stimulus to verify it re-evokes the state, repeating as needed for strength (usually 5-7 pairings). Anchors are categorized by sensory modalities—kinesthetic (e.g., touching the shoulder or squeezing a hand), auditory (e.g., a specific word or tonality), and visual (e.g., a gesture or imagined image)—often aligned with an individual's primary representational system for optimal effectiveness. For increased intensity, multiple anchors can be stacked by sequentially firing them in rapid succession, amplifying the associated state, as seen in exercises where kinesthetic and auditory anchors are combined. A practical example involves anchoring confidence by recalling a successful memory, then touching the wrist at its height; later, firing the wrist touch during a stressful presentation re-triggers the confident state. Reframing, another foundational NLP intervention, shifts an individual's perspective on an experience or behavior by altering its assigned meaning or situational context, thereby transforming emotional responses without changing the facts. Content reframing redefines the internal significance of an event—for instance, viewing jealousy not as a destructive emotion but as a signal of valued connection that motivates positive action. Context reframing, in contrast, changes the circumstances under which the behavior is evaluated, such as interpreting a child's hyperactivity as an adaptive response to boredom rather than a deficit, making it resourceful in an engaging environment. These approaches presuppose that all behaviors serve a positive intention, even if maladaptive, and aim to uncover and redirect that intent. The six-step reframe provides a systematic process for integrating parts of the to resolve internal conflicts: first, identify the unwanted or "signal" (e.g., a ); second, establish unconscious communication with the responsible "part" using ideomotor signals like twitches; third, uncover the part's positive behind the ; fourth, ask the creative part of the mind to generate at least three new behaviors achieving the same intent; fifth, obtain agreement from the original part and check for ecological balance with other parts; and sixth, future-pace by testing the change in imagined scenarios to ensure integration. For example, might be reframed by recognizing its intent to provide comfort, then substituting it with alternatives like exercise or journaling, transforming a perceived problem into an opportunity for . In phobia treatment, reframing can shift into by associating the trigger with a resourceful , such as linking a visual of the feared object to a state of , allowing the individual to approach it with neutral or positive affect.

Submodalities and Swish Pattern

In neuro-linguistic programming (NLP), submodalities refer to the specific qualities or attributes that distinguish one sensory representation from another within the primary representational systems of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic modalities. These finer details, such as , , color, or for visual images; , pitch, or for sounds; and temperature, texture, or intensity for feelings, form the structural components that encode the intensity and meaning of subjective experiences. Introduced by NLP co-founders and in the late 1970s as extensions of their representational systems model, submodalities enable practitioners to map and alter these attributes across modalities to modify emotional responses or behaviors, such as diminishing the impact of a traumatic memory by reducing its visual or auditory . The Swish pattern is a submodality intervention technique designed to rewire habitual behaviors by rapidly substituting an unwanted internal representation with a desired one, primarily through visual . Developed by NLP practitioner Christina Hall and refined by in the early 1980s, the process involves the following steps: First, the individual visualizes the trigger for the unwanted behavior (e.g., reaching for a ) as a large, vivid . Second, a small, distant, and dim of the empowering alternative (e.g., a healthy, confident self) is placed in the corner of the . Third, with a swift mental "swish" sound, the unwanted shrinks, fades to , and recedes into the distance, while the desired expands, brightens, and moves forward to fill the field; this sequence is repeated five to seven times to reinforce neural associations. Applications include breaking habits like , where the trigger of lighting a is replaced by an image of vitality and freedom, or addressing compulsive behaviors by linking triggers to positive outcomes. A related application of submodalities is the fast phobia cure, a dissociation-based process to neutralize responses by restructuring the sensory coding of traumatic memories. Developed by and in 1976, the technique proceeds as follows: The person imagines themselves in a safe theater, floating above their body to view a dissociated "movie" of the phobia event on a screen; the memory plays forward in color to a neutral point, then rewinds rapidly backward—like a in reverse—with humorous or neutral music added, often while the viewer remains dissociated. Finally, the screen is blanked out, and the original event is tested by replaying it forward; if residual discomfort remains, the process repeats with adjustments to submodalities like speed or grayscale. This method is applied to phobias such as of heights or , aiming to interrupt the automatic response through reversed temporal sequencing and spatial separation. Unlike hypnotic methods that typically induce a state for access, submodality techniques like the Swish pattern and fast cure in NLP are performed in a fully awake, eyes-open state, emphasizing self-directed visualization and immediate sensory manipulation without formal induction.

Rapport Building and Calibration

In neuro-linguistic programming (NLP), rapport building is a foundational technique for establishing interpersonal connection by subtly aligning one's with that of another person, creating a sense of harmony and trust. This process involves matching and elements such as body language, speech patterns, and breathing rhythms to enter the other's experiential frame without overt imitation. For instance, a practitioner might synchronize their posture, gestures, or vocal to reflect the interlocutor's, fostering that facilitates open communication. These methods, derived from observations of effective therapists like , emphasize nonverbal congruence to build an "illusion of understanding" while respecting the individual's model of the world. Pacing and leading extends rapport by first validating the current state—pacing—before gently guiding toward desired changes—leading. Pacing entails verbal or nonverbal alignment, such as using statements like "As you sit here listening, you can notice your " to acknowledge realities, thereby gaining trust before introducing suggestions for shift, such as "and as that slows, you might feel more relaxed." This technique operates on the that people respond positively when their experience is first joined, allowing the leader to influence subtly without resistance. In practice, pacing begins with external like or environmental facts, transitioning to internal states once alignment is established, ensuring ethical application by preserving the other's . Calibration complements rapport by honing the ability to observe and interpret subtle nonverbal signals to discern internal states, enabling precise adjustments in interaction. Practitioners train to detect physiological shifts, such as changes in color, depth, or muscle tension, alongside micro-expressions that reveal emotional undercurrents. A key aspect involves monitoring eye accessing cues according to the NLP model—claimed distinct patterns linked to cognitive processes within representational systems, where, for right-handed individuals, upward gazes often indicate visual recall (up and to the left) or construction (up and to the right), lateral movements suggest auditory (down and to the left for internal auditory), and downward shifts point to kinesthetic sensations or internal dialogue (down and to the right), though left-handers may exhibit reversed patterns. Such allows real-time feedback on whether interventions resonate, drawing from sensory acuity exercises to avoid assumptions and enhance . In negotiation contexts, these and techniques accelerate trust-building by the counterpart's communication style and calibrating to their nonverbal responses, leading to more collaborative outcomes. Negotiators apply matching of predicates and to align with the other's sensory preferences, pacing concessions or proposals to their tempo, which reduces defensiveness and opens avenues for mutual gain. For example, observing eye cues during discussions can signal when a proposal evokes positive internal visualization, allowing timely . Empirical applications highlight how such methods enhance perceived , shortening the path to agreements without manipulative intent. Advanced practices incorporate perceptual positions to deepen and . The second position involves adopting the other's viewpoint, experiencing their emotions and thoughts as if in their body, which builds profound connection by transcending one's own biases. The third position, as a dissociated observer, provides meta-perspective to assess dynamics objectively, refining interactions by identifying imbalances in or miscalibrations. These positions, used sequentially, enhance interpersonal sensitivity, particularly in complex exchanges requiring nuanced understanding.

Applications

Psychotherapy and Counseling

Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) has been employed in and counseling to facilitate change in clients experiencing challenges, such as trauma, anxiety, and internal divisions, by leveraging language patterns, visualization, and . Therapists integrate NLP techniques to enhance and reframe subjective experiences, often as a complementary tool within broader therapeutic frameworks. This approach emphasizes the client's internal representations of , aiming to modify unhelpful patterns through structured interventions. A prominent integration involves Timeline Therapy, developed by Tad James in the 1980s as an extension of NLP principles, which assists in trauma resolution by having clients visualize their life events along an imagined timeline. In this process, individuals dissociate from distressing memories—floating above them to release associated negative emotions like fear or guilt—while installing empowering resources for future interactions. This method is particularly applied in counseling for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), allowing gentle access to unconscious material without reliving the trauma, and has been incorporated into therapeutic protocols for emotional release. Another key integration is Parts Integration, created by Connirae and Steve Andreas in the 1980s, which addresses internal conflicts by identifying opposing "parts" of the psyche—such as a logical part versus an emotional one—and aligning them around a shared positive . The technique involves sensory representations (e.g., visual images or kinesthetic feelings) of each part, followed by resource sharing and physical integration, often visualized as merging hands to symbolize unity. In , it is used to resolve in or self-sabotaging behaviors, promoting psychological congruence and reducing symptoms of . Reported case studies highlight NLP's application in anxiety reduction and PTSD treatment. For instance, , a co-founder of NLP, demonstrated rapid cures in live workshops during the and , using dissociation techniques to separate clients from traumatic triggers, resulting in immediate symptom relief as observed in recordings. In a pilot study of post-combat PTSD veterans, NLP interventions, including visual-kinesthetic dissociation, led to significant decreases in anxiety, depression, and stress scores after brief sessions. Similarly, therapist Richard Gray applied an NLP-derived Reconsolidation of Traumatic Memories (RTM) protocol—viewing trauma as a dissociated black-and-white reversed in color—to eliminate intrusive symptoms in 75-85% of PTSD clients, as documented in clinical demonstrations. These examples illustrate NLP's focus on quick, experiential shifts in counseling settings. NLP training for therapists often positions it as an adjunct to (CBT) or , enhancing rapport-building and pattern interruption skills. Programs certify practitioners in NLP techniques to complement CBT's with sensory-based reframing or to deepen hypnotic trances through language patterns, as seen in integrated curricula from professional hypnosis institutes. This adjunctive use allows therapists to accelerate client progress in treating anxiety or phobias, where NLP's modeling of successful behaviors augments CBT's evidence-based protocols. Specific protocols include the Change History process, outlined by Bandler and Grinder in their 1979 work, which uses guided to revisit and re-experience past events with added positive resources, thereby altering current emotional responses to those memories. In counseling, clients are led to "change" historical incidents—such as a —by associating resourceful states like confidence, leading to reduced reactivity in present-day triggers. Complementing this, the Core Transformation protocol, developed by Connirae Andreas in 1994, involves iteratively questioning the intention behind an unwanted behavior or feeling (e.g., "What would that get for you?") until reaching a core positive state like , which then transforms the original issue. This self-guided or therapist-facilitated method is applied in for deep-seated issues like chronic anxiety, fostering lasting shifts without confrontation. Ethical considerations in NLP psychotherapy emphasize , requiring therapists to fully disclose the technique's nature, potential benefits, and limitations, including its roots in modeling rather than empirical validation. Practitioners must ensure clients understand that NLP is not a substitute for medically supervised treatment and obtain explicit agreement before employing trance-like processes, to safeguard and prevent . Professional guidelines from NLP associations stress transparency about the method's controversial status to mitigate risks in vulnerable populations.

Alternative Medicine and Self-Help

Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) has been applied in contexts to facilitate personal growth through structured techniques such as well-formed outcomes for and submodalities for enhancing daily affirmations. Well-formed outcomes involve defining goals in sensory-specific, positive, self-initiated, and ecologically balanced terms to increase achievability and , drawing from NLP's foundational principles developed by and . Submodalities, which adjust the qualitative attributes of internal representations like brightness or volume in mental imagery, allow individuals to intensify the emotional impact of affirmations, making them more effective for building self-confidence and habit formation in daily routines. In , NLP techniques like reframing have been integrated into practices to alter perceptions of discomfort without pharmacological intervention. A randomized involving patients post-open-heart found that a 30-minute NLP session incorporating behavior formation techniques significantly reduced postoperative levels compared to controls, with effects persisting into the recovery period. Additionally, some holistic practitioners combine NLP with energy-based modalities such as , using NLP's visualization and anchoring to enhance energy flow and emotional release during sessions, though for this remains exploratory. Influential self-help literature and digital programs have popularized NLP for . ' 1991 book Awaken the Giant Within incorporates core NLP methods, including neuro-associative conditioning derived from representational systems and submodalities, to guide readers in mastering emotional states and achieving long-term goals. Mobile applications, such as those implementing the swish pattern—a rapid visualization technique to replace unwanted behaviors with desired ones—enable users to practice self-hypnosis-like shifts for habit change, with tools like Neuro Innovations' Swish software providing guided audio for daily use. Within community practices, NLP supports recovery by reprogramming language patterns and beliefs to prevent , as demonstrated in an exploratory study with who inject drugs, where participants reported benefiting from NLP sessions, including meta-model questioning, for de-addiction and prevention. For stress relief, community workshops often employ NLP anchoring to associate calming triggers with tense situations, with on athletes showing reduced stress and enhanced cognitive function after targeted NLP interventions. In the 2020s, emerging trends integrate NLP with (VR) for training, leveraging immersive environments to amplify NLP's sensory-based techniques. Studies have explored VR-NLP combinations to foster metacognitive awareness and emotional regulation, particularly in and contexts, where users report heightened engagement and sustained benefits.

Business and Education

Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) has been applied in settings to enhance sales persuasion through techniques like the meta-model, which involves targeted questioning to clarify vague statements and reveal underlying thought processes, thereby improving outcomes. Practitioners use this model to probe client patterns, such as asking "How specifically?" to uncover assumptions and build more effective sales dialogues. In , NLP modeling techniques allow executives to replicate successful behaviors by analyzing sensory-based representations of high-performing leaders, fostering skills in team motivation and strategic alignment. In executive coaching, NLP integrates with established frameworks like the (Goal, Reality, Options, Will) by incorporating rapport-building elements to deepen client trust and accelerate goal attainment. This adaptation emphasizes mirroring nonverbal cues during the Reality and Options phases to enhance communication flow, leading to improved executive performance in areas such as and . Studies indicate that NLP-enhanced coaching can boost and , contributing to higher professional efficacy among participants. Recent studies (as of 2024) have explored NLP applications in both offline and online classes to enhance student engagement. Within education, NLP promotes accelerated learning by tailoring instruction to visual, auditory, and kinesthetic (VAK) preferences, enabling educators to design multisensory lessons that match students' dominant representational systems. For instance, visual learners benefit from diagrams and mind maps, while kinesthetic approaches involve hands-on activities, resulting in improved comprehension and retention rates in programs. Reframing techniques further support study habits by shifting negative perceptions of challenges—such as viewing anxiety as preparatory excitement—to build student confidence and persistence. Corporate training programs, such as those offered by the iNLP Center, deliver NLP workshops to organizations, focusing on teams and groups to cultivate practical skills like and . In sports , NLP has been utilized with elite athletes, including Olympic competitors, to refine mental visualization and state management for peak performance during high-stakes events. Despite these applications, NLP seminars in business and education contexts have faced criticism for overpromising return on investment (ROI), with systematic reviews highlighting limited empirical evidence of sustained organizational impact and concerns over of transformative results. Such critiques underscore the need for measurable outcomes in professional training programs to validate efficacy beyond anecdotal reports.

Criticisms and Controversies

Scientific Evaluation and Pseudoscience Claims

Scientific evaluations of neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) have consistently highlighted a lack of empirical support for its core claims, with multiple reviews concluding that it does not meet standards of scientific rigor. Early assessments in the 1980s, such as Christopher Sharpley's 1984 review of 26 studies, found no evidence supporting key NLP concepts like preferred representational systems, eye-accessing cues, or predicate matching, with results often attributable to chance or methodological weaknesses. Sharpley's 1987 follow-up analysis reinforced this, examining nonsupportive data across NLP hypotheses and questioning whether the theory's vagueness renders it untestable rather than disproven. Subsequent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the and beyond, particularly on phobia treatments, have yielded mixed but largely underwhelming results, often comparable to effects. For instance, a RCT testing NLP's "rapid phobia cure" on reported short-term symptom reduction but no superiority over control conditions, with effects fading without follow-up and small sample sizes limiting reliability. A 2015 meta-analysis of 12 NLP psychotherapy studies reported a moderate (standardized mean difference of 0.54) for psychological outcomes, akin to established therapies, yet acknowledged high heterogeneity and risks of bias due to non-blinded designs. Criticisms of NLP center on its lack of and neuroscientific inaccuracies, undermining its claims as a valid psychological model. Core ideas like submodalities—fine distinctions in sensory representations purported to directly alter function and —lack supporting neuroscientific , with tests showing no reliable changes in neural processing or therapeutic outcomes beyond suggestion effects. The theory's foundational metaphors of function, drawn from outdated 1970s linguistics and , fail to align with modern , rendering claims empirically ungrounded. Professional psychological bodies have rejected NLP as pseudoscience due to these evidential gaps. The British Psychological Society, in a 2023 review of NLP coaching literature, emphasized the absence of a clear definition and robust outcome studies, stating that NLP is not grounded in scientific findings from psychology or neuroscience and requires empirical validation to gain legitimacy. The American Psychological Association has not issued a formal statement but aligns with broader psychological consensus viewing NLP as a discredited approach, with scientific reviews citing its pseudoscientific status for lacking falsifiable hypotheses and replicable results. Recent research up to 2025 shows limited positive findings, primarily in contexts, but maintains overall amid persistent methodological flaws. A 2023 review in the International Coaching Psychology Review analyzed NLP applications in coaching and found tentative benefits for rapport-building techniques, yet stressed small-scale studies and practitioner-led designs introduce , with no large-scale RCTs confirming efficacy beyond . A 2024 analysis further explores gatekeeping mechanisms in that contribute to NLP's classification as . Common issues include tiny samples (e.g., 20-33 participants), non-randomized controls, and selective reporting by NLP advocates, perpetuating bias and hindering generalizability.

Religious and Cult-Like Aspects

Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) has drawn comparisons to new religious movements due to the guru-like status accorded to its founders, and , whose innovative modeling techniques were often presented as revelatory insights requiring unquestioning adherence. Scholars have noted that NLP's core presuppositions—such as "the map is not the territory" and the idea that people have all the resources they need for change—are treated as dogmatic truths within practitioner communities, fostering a level of devotion akin to religious belief systems. In the Encyclopedia of New Religious Movements, Alexandra Ryan describes NLP as a secular psychological approach but highlights its parallels to new religious movements through the charismatic appeal of its leaders and the transformative rhetoric that encourages followers to adopt it as a comprehensive . The community dynamics of NLP frequently revolve around intense, multi-day seminars that create environments conducive to conversion-like experiences, where participants report profound emotional shifts and a sense of enlightenment. These trainings, often structured as large group awareness trainings (LGATs), employ group pressure, repetitive exercises, and heightened emotional states to induce compliance and personal breakthroughs, mirroring tactics observed in recruitment. Margaret Thaler Singer and , in their examination of such programs, detail how these sessions manipulate participants through isolation from outside perspectives, love-bombing, and induced , leading ex-participants to recount feelings of manipulation and dependency post-training. Accounts from former attendees emphasize the disorienting intensity, with some describing a post-seminar "high" that compels continued involvement, though rigorous empirical studies on NLP-specific cases remain limited. Doctrinal elements within NLP manifest in training rhetoric that positions it as a "way of life" essential for personal mastery, reinforced by a hierarchical certification system progressing from practitioner to master practitioner, trainer, and beyond, which demands escalating time and financial commitment. This progression bears structural similarities to Scientology's auditing levels, where advancement is tied to loyalty and investment, potentially cultivating an insular community ethos. Singer and Lalich extend their critiques to therapies like NLP in Crazy Therapies, portraying them as exploitative frameworks that blend pseudoscientific claims with authoritarian control, encouraging adherents to internalize NLP's principles as infallible. Sociological analyses from the , particularly Singer's work on coercive persuasion in groups, framed NLP-influenced seminars as exhibiting -like traits, including unquestioned authority and engineered emotional ecstasy that mimics . These studies highlighted how the programs' immersive formats—often lasting 20–50 hours over weekends—generate peak experiences of unity and revelation, with participants emerging with renewed zeal for NLP's doctrines. Singer's critiques underscored the risks of psychological manipulation in these settings, drawing from observations of efforts and survivor testimonies that parallel cult recovery narratives. In the 2020s, NLP's landscape has shifted toward decentralized online communities and virtual trainings, which have somewhat diluted the fervent, in-person of earlier decades while preserving pockets of dogmatic enthusiasm among dedicated practitioners. This evolution reflects broader digitization of practices, reducing the isolation of traditional seminars but sustaining rhetorical appeals to NLP as a transformative in forums and programs. Early tensions between co-founders and emerged in the late 1970s, culminating in legal action in 1981 when Bandler sued Grinder for and fiduciary duty related to the management and ownership of the Society of Neuro-Linguistic Programming, which they had established in 1979. The lawsuit stemmed from disputes over control and commercialization rights following their collaborative development of NLP techniques. In October 1981, a court ruled in Bandler's favor, granting him primary control of the Society while awarding Grinder a limited 10-year license to use NLP materials and conduct trainings. This settlement divided trademarks and rights, allowing both parties limited autonomy but sowing seeds for future conflicts. Bandler's high-profile criminal case of 1986-1988, in which he was charged in November 1986 with the first-degree of Corine Christensen, a former NLP student and bookkeeper, in a shooting at his home, drew significant media attention. After a trial lasting several months and marked by on Bandler's volatile and drug-related associations, a Santa Cruz County jury acquitted him in January 1988 following 5.5 hours of deliberation, citing insufficient evidence linking him to the crime. The unsolved drew media scrutiny to Bandler's personal life and indirectly amplified internal NLP divisions. Intensified litigation in the 1990s followed, beginning with Bandler filing a $90 million lawsuit in July 1996 in Santa Cruz against Grinder, Carmen Bostic St. Clair, Christina Hall, , Connirae Andreas, Lara Ewing, and others, claiming sole ownership of NLP intellectual property, the Society of NLP, and exclusive trademark rights to the term "NLP." Bandler alleged unfair competition, , and , seeking to enjoin defendants from using NLP terminology or certifying practitioners without his license. The case involved over 200 unnamed "John and Jane Does," targeting the broader NLP community, and highlighted Bandler's retrospective assertion of sole authorship since the early . Partial settlements occurred in 1999, with the Andreas duo resolving claims out of court, but the core trial proceeded. In May 1999, the court granted to defendant Christina Hall on nine of twelve counts, affirming her co-ownership of the and dismissing Bandler's exclusivity claims. The February 2000 trial ruled decisively against Bandler, declaring his ownership assertions false and unlawful, awarding Hall $600,000 in damages (trebled under the for willful infringement), and placing NLP techniques in the . The judgment prohibited Bandler from claiming sole rights and granted Hall permanent injunctive relief; Bandler's 2003 appeal was denied, solidifying co-ownership among multiple parties including Hall, Tamara Andreas, and others. Parallel U.S. enforcement efforts failed, as courts repeatedly rejected Bandler's monopoly on "NLP" due to its widespread generic use. Trademark battles extended internationally, with Bandler securing a UK registration for "NLP" in the early 1990s, which he attempted to enforce against practitioners. In December 1997, UK trainer Tony Clarkson challenged the mark in the High Court, arguing it had become generic through common usage since NLP's 1970s inception. The court revoked the trademark in Bandler's favor for Clarkson, citing non-distinctiveness and lapsed enforcement, and awarded £100,000 in costs against Bandler, leading to his bankruptcy declaration in the UK. This decision invalidated Bandler's European claims and underscored NLP's status as a descriptive term ineligible for exclusive ownership. The cumulative litigation fragmented the NLP community into rival factions, with certifying bodies like the National Guild of Hypnotists (NGH), emphasizing integration, diverging from pure NLP groups such as the Association of Neuro Linguistic Programming (ANLP) in the UK, which focused on ethical standards and . These splits arose from distrust in centralized control, prompting independent organizations to emerge post-2000 to avoid litigation risks. A November 2000 settlement agreement, signed by Bandler, Grinder, Bostic St. Clair, and others, explicitly permitted multiple entities to certify NLP proficiency without licensing fees, promoting decentralization. By 2025, the legacy of these disputes manifests in a decentralized NLP landscape, with no major lawsuits since 2010; minor skirmishes occasionally arise in training certifications, but courts consistently uphold open use, fostering diverse practitioner networks unbound by original founders' claims.

References

  1. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/therapy-types/neuro-linguistic-programming-therapy
  2. https://www.goodtherapy.org/learn-about-therapy/types/neuro-linguistic-programming
  3. https://anlp.org/knowledge-base/definition-of-nlp
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11293289/
  5. https://www.amazon.com/Origins-Neuro-Linguistic-Programming-Grinder/dp/1845908589
  6. https://www.carlbuchheitphd.com/articles/history-of-early-nlp/
  7. https://anlp.org/knowledge-base/history-of-nlp
  8. https://www.ibhnlp.com/a-short-history-of-nlp-neuro-linguistic-programming
  9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/39018433_Neuro-linguistic_Programming_and_Learning_Theory_a_Response
  10. https://www.landsiedel.com/en/history-of-nlp.html
  11. https://www.neurosemantics.com/the-1980s-when-nlp-fragmented/
  12. https://societyofnlp.com/
  13. https://www.isbns.net/author/Richard_Bandler
  14. https://anlp.org/anlp-history
  15. https://www.ia-nlp.org/principles/section/history-of-ianlp-and-nlp/
  16. https://nlpaa.org.au/
  17. https://nlp.edu.au/whos-who-of-nlp/
  18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336987006_Neuro-Linguistic_Programming_History_Conception_Fundamentals_and_Objectives
  19. https://nlpco.com/
  20. https://anlp.org/knowledge-base/presuppositions-of-nlp
  21. https://www.nlpu.com/Articles/article2.htm
  22. https://www.businessballs.com/emotional-intelligence/neuro-linguistic-programming/
  23. https://www.nlpu.com/Articles/LevelsSummary.htm
  24. https://nlppod.com/mean-focus-structure-rather-content-nlp/
  25. https://logoilibrary.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Copy-of-The-Structure-of-Magic-A-Book-About-Language-and-Therapy-1.pdf
  26. https://cdn.bookey.app/files/pdf/book/en/frogs-into-princes.pdf
  27. https://www.nlpu.com/Articles/artic19.htm
  28. https://nlp.edu.au/representational-systems-nlp/
  29. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Structure_of_Magic.html?id=781rAAAAMAAJ
  30. https://www.nlpworld.co.uk/nlp-training-meta-model/
  31. https://archive.org/details/patternsofhypnot0001band
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367081816_Neuro-linguistic_programming_A_review_of_NLP_research_and_the_application_of_NLP_in_coaching
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9891138/
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291124002183
  35. https://ijip.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/18.01.275.20231103.pdf
  36. https://mf-syndicate.s3.amazonaws.com/frogs_into_princes.pdf
  37. http://www.rickgraynlp.com/images/publications/AnchoringandClassicalConditioning.pdf
  38. https://www.nlpworld.co.uk/nlp-glossary/s/submodalities/
  39. https://nlp.edu.au/swish-pattern-3/
  40. https://www.nlp-techniques.org/what-is-nlp/swish/
  41. https://www.nlp-techniques.org/what-is-nlp/fast-phobia-cure/
  42. https://globalnlptraining.com/simply/harnessing-the-power-nlp-and-hypnosis-techniques/
  43. https://anlp.org/media/Resources/Research%20Papers/georgios-dimantoplois-eye-accessing-cues_6_130.pdf
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393085345_Neuro-Linguistic_Programming_Principles_in_Negotiations
  45. https://www.nlpcoaching.com/time-line-therapy-certification/
  46. https://www.nlpu.com/Patterns/patt11.htm
  47. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-squeaky-wheel/201401/nlp-experts-speak-out
  48. https://www.centreforevidence.org/article/20141202-pilot-study-using-neurolinguistic-programming-nlp-in-post-combat-ptsd
  49. https://www.andreasnlp.com/trainings/core-transformation/
  50. https://www.mindtools.com/agra3qw/using-well-formed-outcomes-in-goal-setting
  51. https://books.google.com/books/about/Neuro_linguistic_Programming_For_Dummies.html?id=5RqRCgAAQBAJ
  52. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocs.15505
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356912155_Neuro-Linguistic_Programming_VR_via_the_8_Pillars_of_Metacognition_X_8_Layers_of_Consciousness_X_8_Intelligences
  54. https://www.neuroinnovations.com/nlp_swish.html
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357336389_Exploratory_Study_of_the_Effectiveness_of_Neuro-Linguistic_Programming_NLP_Techniques_for_Promoting_De_Addiction_and_Prevention_of_Relapse_among_People_Who_Inject_Drugs_in_India
  56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374510664_The_Application_of_Neuro_Linguistic_Programming_NLP_on_Cognitive_Function_and_Stress_Reduction
  57. https://deliberatedirections.com/nlp-sales-techniques/
  58. https://www.nlp-techniques.org/nlp-coaching/nlp-meta-model-questions/
  59. https://anlp.org/knowledge-base/nlp-in-business
  60. https://inlpcenter.org/the-coaching-edge-how-neuro-linguistic-programming-empowers-client-transformation/
  61. https://coacharya.com/blog/nlp-coaching-everything-you-need-to-know/
  62. https://www.nlpcoaching.com/study-effect-of-nlp-on-academic-achievement/
  63. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378913213_Neuro-Linguistic_Programming_The_Application_in_Offline_and_Online_Classes
  64. https://jltr.academypublication.com/index.php/jltr/article/download/4982/3973/13310
  65. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Impact-of-Neuro-Linguistic-Programming-%28NLP%29-on-AfsaneMoharamkhani-LotfollahKarimi/49e9502b4b86c75273102c2d88b212f9a35d42b4
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382207620_Enhancing_Students%27_Self-confidence_in_the_EFL_Classroom_through_Neuro-Linguistic_Programing_Technique_-_Reframing
  67. https://inlpcenter.org/
  68. https://anlp.org/knowledge-base/how-nlp-can-help-with-sports-performance
  69. https://oxford-review.com/nlp-coaching-problems/
  70. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387344450_Dismantling_the_Hype_A_Systematic_Review_of_NLP_Coaching_Limited_Impact_in_Organizations
  71. https://tomwitkow.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/a-review-of-research.pdf
  72. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1987-11411-001
  73. https://sapc.ac.uk/conference/2016/abstract/neurolinguistic-programming-intervention-rapid-phobia-cure-effective-fear
  74. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26609647/
  75. https://explore.bps.org.uk/content/bpsicpr/14/1/57
  76. https://www.adam-eason.com/nlp-scientific-british-psychological-society-dont-think/
  77. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02691728.2024.2326828
  78. https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/91275/3/Passmore%2520%2526%2520Rowson%2520-%2520FINAL9Nov18.pdf
  79. https://www.carlbuchheitphd.com/articles/nlp-1976-1978/
  80. https://www.goodtherapy.org/famous-psychologists/richard-bandler.html
  81. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-01-28-mn-39205-story.html
  82. https://www.jewage.org/wiki/en/Article:Richard_Bandler_-_Biography
  83. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-01-29-mn-26470-story.html
  84. https://www.neurosemantics.com/the-lawsuit-that-almost-killed-nlp/
  85. https://thesocietyofnlp.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Summary-of-Legal-Proceedings_1997-2003.pdf
  86. https://www.landsiedel.com/en/nlp/history-of-nlp.html
  87. https://www.anylaw.com/case/bandler-v-hall/california-court-of-appeal/06-22-2003/zqOsR2YBTlTomsSB9AI4
  88. https://asiaminddynamics.com/what-is-nlp/licensed-nlp-certification-debunking-a-myth/
  89. https://trainingzone.co.uk/nlp-trademark-action-leaves-bandler-bankrupt/
  90. https://www.personneltoday.com/hr/mind-games/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.