"The New Yorker" publishes a profile of Sidis, detailing his current life in relative obscurity. Sidis sues the magazine for libel and invasion of privacy, arguing that the article caused him humiliation and distress.

A lower court initially rules in favor of "The New Yorker". Sidis appeals the decision.

The Supreme Court ultimately upholds the lower court's decision, siding with "The New Yorker". The court's ruling affirms the right of the media to report on public figures, even if they have retreated from public life. This case has significant implications for privacy law and the definition of a public figure.