Recent from talks
1992 Colorado Amendment 2
Knowledge base stats:
Talk channels stats:
Members stats:
1992 Colorado Amendment 2
Amendment 2 was a ballot measure approved by Colorado voters on November 3, 1992, simultaneously with the United States presidential election. The amendment prevented municipalities from enacting anti-discrimination laws protecting gay, lesbian, or bisexual people.
The amendment's enactment prompted a widespread boycott. It was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in Romer v. Evans (1996).
The proposal appeared on the ballot as follows:
Shall there be an amendment to Article II of the Colorado Constitution to prohibit the state of Colorado and any of its political subdivisions from adopting or enforcing any law or policy which provides that homosexual, lesbian, or bisexual orientation, conduct, or relationships constitutes or entitles a person to claim any minority or protected status, quota preferences, or discrimination?
Several major cities in Colorado enacted laws prohibiting anti-gay discrimination, including Aspen in 1977, Boulder in 1987, and Denver in 1991. Literature from Colorado for Family Values (CFV), a conservative group based in Colorado Springs, presented municipal anti-discrimination laws as the first steps towards a "national 'gay-rights' law." CFV received support from national organizations involved in anti-gay campaigns, including Focus on the Family, which had moved its headquarters to Colorado Springs the year before. Focus on the Family donated campaign materials including a strategy guide for activists produced by the Family Research Council.
In March 1992, CFV submitted the required signatures for a ballot initiative. Their amendment would add the following passage to the state Constitution:
Neither the State of Colorado, through any of its branches or departments, nor any of its agencies, political subdivisions, municipalities or school districts, shall enact, adopt or enforce any statute, regulation, ordinance or policy whereby homosexual, lesbian or bisexual orientation, conduct, practices or relationships shall constitute or otherwise be the basis of or entitle any person or class of persons to have or claim any minority status, quota preferences, protected status or claim of discrimination. This Section of the Constitution shall be in all respects self-executing.
Taking advantage of public hostility toward affirmative action, campaigners invoked the idea of "special rights". In contrast to the actual municipal ordinances at issue, which only protected homosexuals from discrimination, the idea of "special rights" was used to persuade voters that gays and lesbians were seeking privileges for a chosen way of life at odds with societal norms. A focus group paid for by Equal Protection Ordinance Colorado found that while Coloradans didn't agree with anti-gay discrimination, they disliked anything related to affirmative action.
Hub AI
1992 Colorado Amendment 2 AI simulator
(@1992 Colorado Amendment 2_simulator)
1992 Colorado Amendment 2
Amendment 2 was a ballot measure approved by Colorado voters on November 3, 1992, simultaneously with the United States presidential election. The amendment prevented municipalities from enacting anti-discrimination laws protecting gay, lesbian, or bisexual people.
The amendment's enactment prompted a widespread boycott. It was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in Romer v. Evans (1996).
The proposal appeared on the ballot as follows:
Shall there be an amendment to Article II of the Colorado Constitution to prohibit the state of Colorado and any of its political subdivisions from adopting or enforcing any law or policy which provides that homosexual, lesbian, or bisexual orientation, conduct, or relationships constitutes or entitles a person to claim any minority or protected status, quota preferences, or discrimination?
Several major cities in Colorado enacted laws prohibiting anti-gay discrimination, including Aspen in 1977, Boulder in 1987, and Denver in 1991. Literature from Colorado for Family Values (CFV), a conservative group based in Colorado Springs, presented municipal anti-discrimination laws as the first steps towards a "national 'gay-rights' law." CFV received support from national organizations involved in anti-gay campaigns, including Focus on the Family, which had moved its headquarters to Colorado Springs the year before. Focus on the Family donated campaign materials including a strategy guide for activists produced by the Family Research Council.
In March 1992, CFV submitted the required signatures for a ballot initiative. Their amendment would add the following passage to the state Constitution:
Neither the State of Colorado, through any of its branches or departments, nor any of its agencies, political subdivisions, municipalities or school districts, shall enact, adopt or enforce any statute, regulation, ordinance or policy whereby homosexual, lesbian or bisexual orientation, conduct, practices or relationships shall constitute or otherwise be the basis of or entitle any person or class of persons to have or claim any minority status, quota preferences, protected status or claim of discrimination. This Section of the Constitution shall be in all respects self-executing.
Taking advantage of public hostility toward affirmative action, campaigners invoked the idea of "special rights". In contrast to the actual municipal ordinances at issue, which only protected homosexuals from discrimination, the idea of "special rights" was used to persuade voters that gays and lesbians were seeking privileges for a chosen way of life at odds with societal norms. A focus group paid for by Equal Protection Ordinance Colorado found that while Coloradans didn't agree with anti-gay discrimination, they disliked anything related to affirmative action.
Recent media