Hubbry Logo
Alice GoffmanAlice GoffmanMain
Open search
Alice Goffman
Community hub
Alice Goffman
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Alice Goffman
Alice Goffman
Alice Goffman
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Alice Goffman (born 1982) is an American sociologist, urban ethnographer, and author. She was assistant professor of sociology at the University of Wisconsin–Madison and visiting assistant professor of sociology at Pomona College.[5] She is known for the controversy that resulted from the publication of her 2014 book On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City.[6] She is the paternal granddaughter of Max Goffman and Anne Goffman, née Averbach, daughter of famed sociologist Erving Goffman and niece to famed actress Frances Bay.

Key Information

Early life and education

[edit]

Goffman attended The Baldwin School in Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania.[7] She earned a BA at the University of Pennsylvania and a PhD at Princeton University, both in sociology.[3] Her doctoral dissertation committee was chaired by Mitchell Duneier and included Paul DiMaggio, Devah Pager, Cornel West, and Viviana Zelizer.[1]

While earning her PhD at Princeton, Goffman co-taught undergraduate courses with Mitch Duneier as a Lloyd Cotsen Graduate Teaching Fellow.[8] In 2010, she was awarded a two-year fellowship at the University of Michigan as a Robert Wood Johnson Scholar.[9]

Career

[edit]

Beginning in the fall of 2012, Goffman taught both undergraduate and graduate level courses as an assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. At UW Madison, she established the Wisconsin Collective for Ethnographic Research with a colleague and served on several committees. She has served as a reviewer and board member for several different sociological publications.[10][11]

In 2014, Goffman published On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City, an ethnographic account of her fieldwork on the impact of policing on the lives of young black men in Northeast Philadelphia. Since the publication of On the Run, Goffman has delivered talks at dozens of colleges, universities, and conferences. In 2015, she gave a TED Talk titled "How we’re priming some kids for college—and others for prison."[12] That same year, she was accepted to the one-year fellowship program at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton.[13]

In April 2017, after she was offered a position as a visiting professor at Pomona College, an anonymously authored open letter[14] was written calling for Goffman's appointment to be rescinded due to allegations of racism in her work and research methods.[15][16] The offer was not rescinded.

In 2019, she was denied tenure at University of Wisconsin-Madison.[17]

On the Run

[edit]

On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City, published by University of Chicago Press, began as a research project Goffman started as a second-year undergraduate at the University of Pennsylvania, when she immersed herself in a disadvantaged neighborhood of Philadelphia with African-American young men who were subject to a high level of surveillance and police activity.[18] Goffman continued working on this project as a graduate student at Princeton, eventually turning it into her doctoral thesis and book.[18] Issued in paperback in April 2015, the book uses the experience of Goffman's subjects to illustrate how police treat and mistreat young black men within the framework of the American criminal justice system, and how this reshapes the lives of families in America's poor, black neighborhoods.[19]

In the book's introduction, Goffman highlights her central argument: "The sheer scope of policing and imprisonment in poor Black neighborhoods is transforming community life in ways that are deep and enduring, not only for the young men who are their targets but for their family members, partners, and neighbors."[20]

Initial critical reception

[edit]

Several sociologists, including Howard Becker, Elijah Anderson, and Carol Stack, reviewed the book favorably.

Cornel West wrote, "Alice Goffman's On the Run is the best treatment I know of the wretched underside of neo-liberal capitalist America. Despite the social misery and fragmented relations, she gives us a subtle analysis and poignant portrait of our fellow citizens who struggle to preserve their sanity and dignity."[18]

On the Run was also favorably received outside academia. The New York Times named it one of "100 notable books of 2014."[21] The New York Times Book Review also named it as its weekly "Editor's Choice" selection on July 6, 2014.[22] In The New York Times, Alex Kotlowitz called it "a remarkable feat of reporting."[23] Writing in The New York Review of Books, Christopher Jencks predicted that the work would become "an ethnographic classic."[24]

The book continued to gain popularity after Goffman's TED Talk, which has over 2 million views[12] and has been widely circulated online.[25] The talk describes the consequences of incarceration and policing for marginalized young people, calling for an end to mass incarceration and highlighting the need for criminal justice reform.[12] Goffman's argument that "tough on crime" policing has done more harm than good has resonated with many advocates for reform on social media.[26]

Conservative law professor Amy Wax of the University of Pennsylvania Law School wrote, "[Goffman] puts her finger on the wrong button. The force field that deforms 6th Street is not society’s effort to eradicate crime, but crime itself."[27]

On the left, Dwayne Betts in Slate criticized Goffman for ignoring the lives of quiet achievement most young men live in the neighborhood she studied in favor of an "unrelenting focus on criminality."[28] Christina Sharpe in The New Inquiry criticized Goffman for failing to fully understand and acknowledge the power structures at work during her fieldwork, and criticized the book's favorable critical reception for elevating the work of a white scholar over important contributions by black scholars.[29] In addition, some reviewers have accused Goffman, as a white upper-class woman, of writing "jungle book" tropes about poor, young African-American men.

Allegations of data fabrication and criminal conduct

[edit]

Some parties have criticized On the Run for factual inaccuracy and Goffman's allegedly felonious conduct. Legal ethicist Steven Lubet, reviewing On the Run in The New Rambler, claimed that Goffman had admitted to committing conspiracy to commit murder and "involved her[self] as an accomplice in the evident commission of a major felony"[30] in a passage describing the aftermath of the murder of one of her sources. After Goffman responded,[31] Lubet said that she "essentially admits that she embellished and exaggerated her account of a crucial episode, which should leave even the most sympathetic readers doubting her word."[32][33] Lubet revisited On the Run in his 2017 book Interrogating Ethnography: Why Evidence Matters.[34][35]

Lubet also questioned Goffman's claim, which he called "outlandish", that she had personally witnessed police officers making arrests after running the names of visitors to hospitals.[30] Yale law professor James Forman Jr. agreed with Lubet and wrote that he "had never heard of such a thing. When I spoke with civil-rights attorneys and public defenders in New York, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C., and with a police official in New Haven, Connecticut, I couldn’t find a single person who knew of a case like Alex and Donna’s."[36] Journalist Dan McQuade of Philadelphia magazine was similarly unable to verify Goffman's assertion.[37] Lubet also questioned a claim that one of Goffman's sources, "Tim", had at age 11 been placed on three years of juvenile probation on the charge of "accessory" to receiving stolen property, after being arrested as a passenger in a stolen car.

Reporter Jesse Singal of New York magazine tracked down some of the anonymized subjects of the book and interviewed them. He concluded that "her book is, at the very least, mostly true", though he was unable to obtain precise details of the hospital arrest incident or the arrest of the juvenile "Tim".[38] Singal wrote that "Lubet's skepticism seems well-founded" and concluded that "the most likely explanation for these discrepancies is that [Goffman] simply didn't heed her own advice about credulously echoing sources' stories; it might be that important details about how these events unfolded got lost along the way."[39]

In his lengthy review of the book and the controversy, law professor Paul Campos at the University of Colorado Boulder said there were "numerous and significant incongruities, contradictions, inaccuracies, and improbable incidents scattered throughout" the text and that Goffman's book "reveals flaws in the way social science in general, and ethnography in particular, is produced."[40] To take one example, he was highly skeptical of Goffman's description of an incident where a man was shot and killed in her presence. Campos asked whether "a friend of Chuck's [was] actually murdered before Goffman's eyes, forcing her to run away, with blood spattering her shoes and pants? Did she avoid being questioned by the police, who, one presumes, would have discovered both a body and Goffman's car when they arrived on the scene? How is it that having someone murdered right in front of her merits no more than one almost throwaway sentence in her book?"

The popularity of On the Run in the mainstream media has put the practice of ethnography under scrutiny. Journalist Gideon Lewis-Kraus published a longform defense of Goffman's book in The New York Times Magazine, in which he argued that most sociologists consider the alleged errors in On the Run the inevitable result of her university's Institutional Review Board requirement that informants be anonymized and field notes be destroyed.[25]

An anonymous 57-page critique of On the Run circulated on academic LISTSERVs claiming that Goffman had fabricated many of the incidents she described.[25] The University of Wisconsin-Madison reviewed the allegations and found them to be "without merit".[41] Lewis-Kraus read a detailed refutation of the critique composed and shown to him by Goffman, although she has declined to share it with the public.[25] He writes that she "persuasively explains many of the lingering issues" but that "the hardest elements of her story to confirm are the ones that feel like cinematic exaggerations, especially with respect to police practices; several officers challenged as outlandish her claim that she was personally interrogated with guns on the table."[25] When asked for corroboration, Goffman disagreed with what she considered Lewis-Kraus's assumption that "[t]he way to validate the claims in the book is by getting officials who are white men in power to corroborate them.... The point of the book is for people who are written off and delegitimated to describe their own lives and to speak for themselves about the reality they face, and this is a reality that goes absolutely against the narratives of officials or middle-class people. So finding 'legitimate' people to validate the claims—it feels wrong to me on just about every level."[25]

Goffman's publishers told The New York Times that they stood behind Goffman and her book.[42] Goffman's thesis adviser at Princeton, Mitchell Duneier, defended the portion of Goffman's work which is in her thesis, telling The Chronicle of Higher Education that he met with and verified the identities of some of her informants.[43]

In The Chronicle of Higher Education, sociologist Jack Katz also addressed the ethical dilemmas that accompany Goffman's brand of ethnography: "Most of the time, people doing research on drugs and crime and the police don't report the incidents that potentially compromise them. The ethical line she crossed, in a way, was honesty."[43] Columbia sociologist Shamus Khan said: "I don't think Alice made up any data. I think there are questions about reporting things she heard as if they were things she saw (which she is hardly unique in doing—most people do this, but they definitely should not)."[44] Andrew Gelman wrote: "Goffman's success, and the reputation of her work, depend crucially on the trust of her audience. Once that trust is gone, I think it's very hard to get it back. I think she'll have to move into an arena in which she can document her work, or else move into some field such as advocacy in which documented truth is not required."[45]

Awards

[edit]

Personal life

[edit]

Goffman is the daughter of sociologist Erving Goffman and sociolinguist Gillian Sankoff, both Canadian immigrants to the United States.[19] Her father died from stomach cancer in 1982, soon after her birth. In 1993, her mother married the sociolinguist William Labov, who later legally adopted Alice.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Alice Goffman

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Alice Goffman (born 1982) is an American sociologist and urban ethnographer whose work focuses on the social dynamics of low-income communities under intense police scrutiny, most notably in her 2014 book On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City, which draws from six years of fieldwork in a neighborhood and portrays how warrant enforcement disrupts family ties, employment, and daily survival, though the account has been contested for inconsistencies, unverifiable claims, and suggestions of the author's complicity in criminal acts. The daughter of sociologist Erving Goffman, who died when she was an infant, she began her research as an undergraduate at the University of Pennsylvania, embedding herself among young men navigating warrants, arrests, and retaliatory violence on "6th Street," a pseudonym for the site. Her Princeton University PhD dissertation, completed in 2010, expanded this immersion into a broader examination of how policing transforms residents into perpetual fugitives, influencing academic discourse on mass incarceration despite methodological debates. Appointed an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, Goffman received initial acclaim for humanizing the collateral effects of law enforcement but later encountered institutional pushback, including student protests and tenure uncertainties tied to her scholarship's credibility. Central to the disputes is a 2015 critique by Northwestern Steven Lubet, who identified timeline discrepancies—such as mismatched records and implausible event sequences—and contended that Goffman's depiction of driving associates to target a perceived romantic rival amounted to aiding a felony under statutes, potentially disqualifying her observations as unbiased . Goffman countered that anonymization protected sources, rendering public verification impossible, and emphasized her role as participant-observer without endorsing violence, yet subsequent analyses, including archival checks on public records, reinforced doubts about the narrative's fidelity to empirical events over interpretive emphasis on structural forces. These challenges underscore broader tensions in qualitative , where causal claims about policing's impacts rely on amid limited replicability, prompting calls for greater evidentiary rigor in field-based studies of marginalized groups.

Background

Early Life and Family Influences

Alice Goffman was born in May 1982 to the sociologist and sociolinguist Gillian Sankoff. Her father, a pioneering figure in known for works like The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (1959), died of stomach cancer in November of that year, leaving her without direct personal interaction but inheriting a legacy centered on analyzing social performances and micro-interactions. Goffman was raised primarily in Philadelphia's Center City neighborhood, with her mother providing early immersion in academic settings through connections to institutions like the , where both parents had affiliations. Gillian Sankoff later married linguist , another prominent sociolinguist at Penn, further embedding Goffman in elite intellectual networks dominated by high-achieving, white academics of middle-to-upper socioeconomic status. This upbringing offered material security, educational resources, and markedly absent in the impoverished, predominantly Black inner-city communities she would later embed herself in for ethnographic research. The class and racial privileges of her family background—rooted in transatlantic academic migration and institutional prestige—have been noted as a potential lens shaping her observational perspective, given the profound disparities between her insulated, resource-rich environment and the survival strategies of her research subjects evading in segregated urban poverty. Erving Goffman's emphasis on situational meanings in social life may have predisposed her to interpretive approaches in , though critics have questioned whether such inherited frameworks adequately grapple with structural inequalities like those in mass incarceration systems.

Upbringing and Socioeconomic Context

Alice Goffman was born in 1982 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to , a renowned sociologist and president of the , and Gillian Sankoff, a prominent sociolinguist and professor at the . Her father died of in November 1982, when she was an infant, leaving her to be raised primarily by her mother. In 1993, Sankoff married , a foundational figure in and also a professor, who became Goffman's adoptive father. Goffman grew up in Philadelphia's Center City neighborhood, an affluent , within a household steeped in academic discourse on social interaction, language variation, and ethnographic methods. Family dinners often involved debates over these topics, reflecting the of her parents' professions and their positions at a leading institution. As the daughter of university faculty with stable incomes and professional networks, she benefited from the socioeconomic privileges of upper-middle-class academia, including access to cultural and educational opportunities unavailable in lower-income settings. Part of her early childhood involved care by an Italian-American family in , arranged by her mother through a classified advertisement; this provided exposure to a working-class immigrant distinct from her nuclear family's environment but still within the bounds of relative stability and legality. Unlike the chronic instability, warrant evasion, and policing pressures she later ethnographically observed among young black men in West Philadelphia's poorer neighborhoods, Goffman's youth lacked direct encounters with such systemic adversities, positioning her as an observer from a structurally insulated vantage. Critics have noted this disparity, arguing that her affluent, white academic background may have limited intuitive grasp of the incentive structures—such as immediate survival trade-offs over long-term legal compliance—prevalent in the contexts she analyzed, potentially introducing observer biases in interpreting behaviors as primarily reactive to state overreach rather than endogenous cultural or economic drivers.

Education

Undergraduate Studies

Alice Goffman earned a degree in from the in 2004. During her first semester as an undergraduate, she enrolled in a graduate-level course on , which introduced her to ethnographic methods and the study of city life amid Philadelphia's socioeconomic dynamics. The university's location in provided proximity to neighborhoods marked by poverty and high crime rates, offering contextual exposure to the urban environments that would later inform her research interests. Goffman's undergraduate curriculum emphasized qualitative approaches to , aligning with her developing focus on marginalized communities. For her senior thesis, she initiated preliminary observations in a low-income neighborhood, examining the daily challenges faced by young Black men, though this work represented an early, formative exploration rather than comprehensive fieldwork. These experiences at Penn laid a foundational grounding in and urban ethnography, without yet involving extended immersion.

Graduate Research and Dissertation

Alice Goffman completed her PhD in at in 2010. Her doctoral dissertation, centered on urban ethnography, examined social interactions among young men evading in a low-income neighborhood pseudonymously referred to as 6th Street. Supervised by Mitchell Duneier, a sociologist known for his ethnographic studies of urban poverty, Goffman's work built on qualitative traditions emphasizing prolonged fieldwork to capture lived experiences. The dissertation drew from six years of immersion in the field, spanning approximately 2002 to 2008, during which Goffman resided with residents, shared routines, and documented evasion tactics amid aggressive policing. This timeline encompassed her transition from undergraduate tutoring in the area to graduate-level data gathering, positioning the research as a foundational precursor to her later book On the Run. Methodologically, it prioritized and narrative reconstruction over statistical analysis, reflecting Princeton's program's strengths in interpretive sociology but forgoing cross-verification with public records or aggregate data. Goffman's training involved seminars and mentorship in ethnographic techniques, including detailed fieldnote practices and ethical considerations for high-risk settings, yet emphasized subjective immersion without standardized protocols for factual auditing or replicability. Duneier's guidance stressed evidentiary depth through iterative interviewing and contextual embedding, aligning with first-hand accounts as primary in qualitative paradigms. These approaches enabled vivid portrayals of causal dynamics in fugitive life but inherently limited generalizability, as they rested on unquantified observations prone to interpretive variance absent corroborative metrics.

Academic Career

Early Appointments and Fieldwork

Following her completion of a Ph.D. in from in 2010, Alice Goffman undertook a postdoctoral fellowship as a Robert Wood Johnson Scholar in research at the from 2010 to 2012. During this period, she continued to develop research derived from her dissertation, which drew on extended ethnographic observations in 's 6th Street neighborhood, though direct immersion there diminished after her graduate studies. This fellowship facilitated initial publications and talks that highlighted her fieldwork, including a 2009 article in the American Sociological Review titled "On the Run: Wanted Men in a Philadelphia Ghetto," which analyzed evasion tactics amid heightened policing and warrant enforcement in the area. Goffman's foundational fieldwork, spanning approximately six years from around 2004 to 2010, involved residing in the low-income, predominantly Black 6th Street neighborhood in to observe young men's interactions with the system. She shared housing with a core group of male research participants, enabling participant-observation of daily routines, police encounters, and survival strategies, but this deep embedding—while yielding granular data on neighborhood shifts like intensified —limited cross-verification with external records or detached analysis, potentially blurring lines between observer and participant roles. Such prolonged cohabitation, exceeding typical ethnographic timelines, intensified her access to private events but isolated her from broader empirical benchmarks, as later critiques of similar immersion methods have noted risks of subjective bias over causal rigor. In fall 2012, Goffman transitioned to her first tenure-track teaching position as an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she offered undergraduate and graduate courses on urban ethnography and qualitative methods, leveraging her 6th Street data to build a profile in urban sociology. Early outputs from this phase, including seminar presentations at institutions like the University of Chicago and UCLA in 2013, established her as an emerging voice on fugitive life, though the reliance on unrecorded, insider narratives from her fieldwork underscored tensions between immersive depth and verifiable evidence in establishing scholarly reputation.

Positions at Major Institutions

In 2010, following her PhD from , Goffman was appointed as a Robert Wood Johnson Scholar in Health Policy Research at the , a postdoctoral fellowship focused on interdisciplinary health and . This two-year position provided training and resources for early-career scholars examining the disparities. Goffman transitioned to a tenure-track faculty role in fall 2012 as of at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, a public with a strong emphasis on empirical . The Department of Sociology there has historically prioritized research on inequality, , and deviance, areas congruent with her ethnographic expertise in low-income communities. She held this position through 2019, during which her appointment reflected institutional investment in qualitative fieldwork methodologies amid broader departmental strengths in quantitative and theoretical . Her career trajectory demonstrated mobility from specialized postdoctoral training to a competitive tenure-track slot at a major land-grant institution, though her relatively brief pre-tenure period at —spanning seven years—aligns with standard timelines for promotion review rather than extended stability. No other permanent faculty appointments at comparable institutions preceded or coincided with her Wisconsin role.

Tenure Denial and Departure from Academia

In 2019, Alice Goffman was denied tenure at the University of Wisconsin-Madison after completing the standard multi-stage faculty review process, which evaluates scholarship, teaching, and service. Academic observers attributed the outcome in part to lingering methodological critiques of her ethnographic work in On the Run, including unresolved questions about data verifiability and interpretive accuracy raised since 2015, which had eroded confidence in her scholarly record despite initial acclaim. Goffman elected not to appeal the decision, a step available under university policy, and remained in her role for one additional year before departing. Post-2019, Goffman has not secured another tenure-track position or full-time academic affiliation, marking an effective exit from university-based and instruction. Her publication record shows minimal activity thereafter, with no peer-reviewed articles or monographs documented in major databases by 2021, contrasting her earlier output centered on urban ethnography. This trajectory aligns with tenure denial's typical consequences in , where failure to advance often precludes re-entry due to heightened scrutiny of prior evaluations. No official university commentary beyond procedural norms was released, and Goffman issued no public response to the denial itself.

Key Works

Development of On the Run

On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City originated as Alice Goffman's doctoral dissertation in at , which received the American Sociological Association's 2010 Distinguished Dissertation Award in the . The work expanded this dissertation research into a book-length narrative ethnography, published in May 2014 by the , examining the dynamics of fugitive existence among young men in a low-income neighborhood pseudonymously termed "6th Street," amid the broader context of mass incarceration policies. Goffman based the book on six years of fieldwork, beginning during her undergraduate years at the around 2002 and extending through 2008, during which she lived in the neighborhood, tutored local youth, and documented interactions among residents, particularly focusing on anonymized accounts of young African American men evading warrants, arrests, and . This immersive approach involved close relationships with a core group of individuals, including participation in their social networks to observe routine encounters with and the informal economies shaped by legal pressures. The transition from dissertation to published book involved restructuring academic analysis into a more accessible, story-driven format, though specific details of the editorial process, including pre-publication , remain limited in . Ethnographic conventions prioritized participant , resulting in no release of raw field notes, recordings, or detailed methodological appendices, which has constrained post-publication empirical verification of specific claims against primary .

Core Themes and Ethnographic Approach

In On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City, Alice Goffman posits that aggressive policing practices in a low-income Black neighborhood in —intensified since the 1990s through tactics like warrant sweeps and undercover —engender a widespread "" condition among young men, where minor infractions accumulate into warrants that render routine institutions inaccessible. This status disrupts employment opportunities, as arrests frequently occur at workplaces such as fast-food outlets, forcing men to forgo stable jobs or risk capture during onboarding processes. Family dynamics suffer collateral damage, with partners and relatives coerced into informing on s under police pressure or to resolve personal disputes, while children experience fragmented paternal involvement amid custody battles tainted by legal vulnerabilities. Goffman's analysis extends to how this existence fosters underground economies and retaliatory as alternatives to state-mediated resolution, with young men resorting to drug dealing for income—often intermittently and under duress—and measures like shootings in response to perceived threats, as formal protections appear unattainable. The narrative underscores a pervasive of suspicion, where everyday interactions carry risks, prompting adaptations such as viewing police vehicles with acute vigilance or concealing locations through frequent relocations. While these dynamics highlight reactive agency in evasion, the emphasis on policing as the precipitating force may understate the role of initial criminal engagements in generating warrants, portraying cycles of offense and flight as predominantly structurally induced rather than bidirectionally reinforced. Ethnographically, Goffman employs an immersive participant-observation method over six years (2002–2008) in the pseudonymously termed "6th Street" area, documenting over 100 police chase incidents and deriving insights from field notes on block interactions, court appearances, and institutional visits. Influenced by , particularly Erving Goffman's dramaturgical concepts of and total institutions, the approach delivers "thick descriptions" of survival repertoires, such as "dipping and dodging" officers via alley networks or enlisting community lookouts for . Specific vignettes include groups cleaning blood and evidence after street altercations to avert investigations, and vigils for victims conducted under duress, with participants refusing treatment or exiting prematurely to evade waiting patrols targeting warrant-holders. To preserve anonymity, some accounts blend multiple observed events into composites, rendering individual verifiability challenging while prioritizing illustrative patterns. This style captures micro-level tactics but risks narrativizing disparate experiences into a cohesive victimhood arc, potentially amplifying perceptual causality from enforcement to deviance over endogenous subcultural drivers evident in the documented behaviors.

Reception of On the Run

Initial Praise and Academic Awards

On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City, published in 2014, garnered initial acclaim for its detailed ethnographic depiction of young Black men navigating constant and fugitivity in a neighborhood. Sociologist Elijah Anderson, author of Code of the Street, endorsed the book in its promotional materials, stating it "tells, in gripping, hard-won detail, what it's like to be trapped on the wrong side of the law in an urban neighborhood in the United States." This praise highlighted Goffman's ability to convey the pervasive effects of policing on daily life, drawing from her six years of fieldwork. The work built on Goffman's prior recognition: her 2009 article "On the Run: Wanted Men in a ," published in the American Sociological Review, received the 2010 Distinguished Contribution to Scholarship Award for Community and from the . Additionally, the underlying dissertation earned the ASA's 2011 Outstanding Dissertation Award. These honors underscored the perceived innovation in her ethnographic approach to urban poverty and criminal justice dynamics. Media outlets contributed to the positive reception, with The New York Times profiling Goffman's immersive methodology as a model of committed fieldwork that illuminated hidden social realities. The book was also noted for receiving the C. Wright Mills Book Award from the Society for the Study of Social Problems, recognizing its exceptional achievement in social science research. Such endorsements positioned On the Run as a significant contribution to shortly after its release.

Broader Public and Media Impact

On the Run received coverage in outlets that highlighted its portrayal of aggressive policing and its effects on low-income black communities, often framing the book as illustrative of broader failures in the system. For instance, a article in The Atlantic depicted police-resident interactions as akin to warfare, emphasizing how constant and arrests permeated daily life and supported arguments against the intensified enforcement associated with the . Such portrayals contributed to narratives favoring reduced incarceration and policing intensity, particularly among commentators critiquing systemic overreach without equivalent emphasis on underlying patterns of criminal behavior or individual decision-making in high-crime environments. Goffman engaged in numerous public lectures and interviews between 2014 and 2016, where she elaborated on the book's themes of pervasive state intrusion into personal and family spheres. In the year following publication, she conducted 32 public speaking engagements, including a TED talk and the University of Pennsylvania's 31st Annual Public Lecture in April 2015. These appearances amplified depictions of the system as an "occupying force" that exacerbated and evasion tactics, prioritizing structural constraints over personal accountability in discussions of urban violence and evasion. The book achieved notable popularity upon release, garnering positive reviews in outlets like , which praised its immersive reporting on fugitive dynamics, and accumulating thousands of reader ratings on platforms such as . Its public impact peaked around 2014-2015, coinciding with heightened media interest in mass incarceration critiques, but showed no sustained resurgence in broader discourse thereafter, with attention shifting away from its ethnographic claims in subsequent years.

Controversies and Criticisms

Allegations of Data Fabrication and Inaccuracies

In May 2015, legal scholar Steven Lubet published a detailed critique of On the Run, analyzing from courts and , which revealed discrepancies between Goffman's and verifiable data. Lubet noted that records for pseudonymous figures like "Mike" did not align with described incidents, such as a for assaulting an officer, which lacked corresponding entries in police logs or dockets from the relevant period. Additionally, Lubet identified timeline impossibilities, including events purportedly occurring in 2008–2009 after Goffman stated her primary fieldwork had concluded in mid-2007, such as interactions involving "Mike's" mother, whose confirmed her death in October 2007, contradicting depictions of her involvement in later scenes. An anonymous online post circulated in early , later referenced in media analyses, accused Goffman of fabricating composite characters and unverifiable vignettes without disclosure, including sequences of gang pursuits and retaliatory that defied logistical feasibility in the described neighborhood. The post highlighted inconsistencies in incident sequences, such as altered maternal histories involving use and family dynamics, which could not be corroborated through cross-referenced accounts or records, suggesting invention to heighten dramatic effect rather than empirical reporting. These allegations extended to broader fact-checks against , where described patterns and names failed to match Philadelphia's municipal records, undermining claims of direct observation; for instance, multiple vignettes of routine police stops and warrants lacked supporting docket when pseudonyms were adjusted for anonymization patterns outlined in the book. Such mismatches raised questions about the reliability of the ethnographic as a factual basis for sociological conclusions on fugitive life.

Ethical Lapses and Personal Involvement Claims

In the appendix of On the Run (2014), Alice Goffman recounts participating in a drive with armed associates from the 6th Street neighborhood seeking revenge for the killing of a friend referred to as , describing how she drove the vehicle while they searched for the suspected perpetrator. Legal scholars, including professor Steven Lubet, have argued that this self-described involvement constitutes conspiracy to commit murder under law, as it involved an intent to kill with knowledge of the purpose. Such actions raised concerns about potential violations of (IRB) protocols, which typically prohibit researchers from engaging in illegal or harmful activities that could endanger participants or compromise study integrity, though Goffman has not been formally charged or sanctioned. Critics further contended that Goffman's deep immersion blurred ethical boundaries, potentially inducing risky behaviors among subjects or exposing them to greater harm through her presence and encouragement of candid disclosures. As a white researcher from an affluent background conducting fieldwork in a predominantly , low-income Philadelphia community, Goffman faced accusations of leveraging racial and class privileges without sufficient transparency about her outsider status, which some argued exploited community vulnerabilities for narrative gain. Ethnographer Victor Rios, himself from similar communities, criticized this approach as failing to reckon with power imbalances, potentially reinforcing stereotypes of inevitable criminality among young men rather than contextualizing structural factors. Goffman defended her anonymization techniques and emotional bonds as necessary for access and protection, claiming in responses to critics that details like exact locations were withheld per IRB guidelines to safeguard identities. However, skeptics scrutinized these justifications, noting that her active participation—such as driving with weapons—likely compromised objectivity by fostering dependency or altering , raising causal questions about whether her involvement escalated conflicts or biased observations toward over detached analysis. Broader ethnographic debates highlighted tensions between researcher safety, participant welfare, and scientific neutrality, with some arguing that such "go-along-to-get-along" tactics prioritize immersion at the expense of ethical detachment, potentially violating professional codes like those from the emphasizing avoidance of harm.

Defenses from Supporters and Methodological Debates

Mitchell Duneier, Goffman's dissertation advisor at , defended her work by personally meeting and interviewing some of the subjects from her fieldwork, asserting that he found her accounts credible based on those interactions conducted around . Duneier cautioned against dismissing her as fabricated, emphasizing the challenges of verifying immersive in high-risk environments where literal documentation could endanger participants. However, this defense relies on selective, non-public verifications inaccessible to independent scrutiny, underscoring a core empirical limitation: the inability to cross-check claims against comprehensive records due to the method's inherent opacity. Goffman responded to criticisms in 2015 by clarifying that she employed pseudonyms for all individuals and locations, as well as composite characters in some narrative reconstructions, to safeguard amid ongoing police in the studied neighborhood. She further explained destroying her field notes after publication in 2014 to prevent their potential use in legal actions against subjects, framing these practices as ethical necessities rather than evasions of accountability. A 2016 New York Times Magazine profile portrayed such decisions as stemming from her intense personal immersion and passion for the community, rather than deliberate , though it acknowledged inconsistencies arising from and reconstruction over years of undocumented events. These clarifications align with ethnographic conventions but weaken empirical robustness, as composites obscure the boundary between observed events and authorial synthesis, complicating assessments of factual accuracy. The controversies ignited broader methodological debates within , pitting ethnography's emphasis on interpretive validity—capturing lived experiences and —against demands for quantifiable verifiability akin to quantitative standards. Supporters invoked longstanding traditions where trumps detailed record-keeping to protect vulnerable populations, arguing that rigid undermines the genre's strength in revealing causal patterns invisible to surveys or statistics. Critics, however, highlighted how invoking shields specific claims from falsification, fostering tensions between qualitative insight and causal realism, as untestable narratives risk conflating subjective interpretation with objective truth absent corroborative . This divide exposes ethnography's vulnerability: while interpretive depth may illuminate social processes, the absence of auditable evidence leaves defenses empirically undergirded, reliant on trust in the researcher's fidelity rather than replicable proof.

Legacy and Current Status

Influence on Urban Sociology and Policy Discussions

Goffman's On the Run contributed to by illuminating the dynamics of "fugitive life" in low-income neighborhoods, where aggressive policing and outstanding warrants foster pervasive evasion strategies among young men, thereby extending scholarly focus beyond incarceration to its pre-arrest ripple effects on daily social interactions and . This ethnographic framing advanced discussions on how mass incarceration's machinery—through and legal debts—erodes community cohesion, influencing subsequent qualitative studies on policing and informal economies of avoidance. However, the work's emphasis on systemic harms has drawn critique for sidelining quantitative evidence linking intensified urban policing to measurable declines, such as the 1990s drop in Philadelphia's rates amid heightened enforcement, thus presenting an incomplete causal picture of law enforcement's trade-offs. In policy arenas, the book informed 2010s advocacy against mass incarceration by supplying vivid accounts of policing's collateral damages, cited in reform-oriented analyses that underscore warrants' role in perpetuating poverty cycles and justify interventions like warrant forgiveness programs. It indirectly bolstered narratives supporting reforms, as seen in legal scholarship referencing its depictions of flight risks tied to minor violations rather than inherent dangerousness, contributing to shifts like New Jersey's 2017 cashless implementation aimed at reducing . Yet, this influence has been faulted for amplifying anti-policing sentiments without integrating data—such as post-reform upticks in rearrests observed in jurisdictions adopting similar measures—potentially prioritizing decarceration's social relief over deterrence's public safety gains. Pedagogically, On the Run gained traction in courses during the mid-2010s for exemplifying immersive fieldwork on urban inequality, prompting instructors to explore ethnographic strengths in capturing lived experiences of marginalization. Post-2015 controversies over factual inconsistencies, however, shifted its classroom role toward case studies in methodological rigor and ethical boundaries, with adoption waning as faculty opt for texts emphasizing triangulated evidence amid broader skepticism of unverified narrative-driven . Recent reflections, including 2025 analyses of ethnographic pitfalls, position it less as a cornerstone of curricula and more as a reference for debating source verifiability in policy-informing research.

Ongoing Critiques and Professional Trajectory

Following her denial of tenure at the in 2019, Alice Goffman has exhibited minimal scholarly productivity, with no new peer-reviewed publications, books, or major academic appointments documented in standard databases or university listings as of 2025. Her profile, last updated with an unverified University of Wisconsin affiliation, shows citations primarily accruing to pre-2015 work rather than subsequent output, indicating a withdrawal from active research and teaching roles. This trajectory contrasts sharply with expectations for a scholar of her early acclaim, highlighting the professional repercussions of unresolved controversies surrounding evidentiary standards in her . Retrospectives between 2021 and 2025 have sustained scrutiny of Goffman's methodological approach, particularly her reliance on unverified personal without supporting documentation, such as or police records that could confirm extraordinary claims like multiple arrests of new fathers in a single evening. Critics, including legal scholar Steven Lubet in his 2018 analysis extended in later discussions, argue this omission undermines the causal claims about policing's effects on urban communities, as basic cross-verification—feasible even in qualitative work—remains absent. Such lapses exemplify broader risks in where researcher privilege, including access to elite networks unreflected in the work's positionality, can prioritize dramatic over replicable evidence, a pattern enabled by sociology's occasional tolerance for over despite demands for . By 2025, academic commentary has increasingly framed Goffman's case as emblematic of self-deception or exaggeration in field research, with statisticians and methodologists questioning how untestable anecdotes evade rigorous falsification, potentially deluding both author and field into accepting unverifiable causal inferences about social dynamics. This ongoing debate underscores the necessity of empirical safeguards in qualitative sociology to mitigate biases toward ideologically resonant but unsubstantiated accounts, particularly when institutional pressures favor accessible narratives on inequality over painstaking validation. Her limited post-2019 presence serves as a cautionary example of how failure to address these deficits can halt professional advancement, reinforcing calls for heightened verification in ethnographic scholarship.

References

  1. https://paw.princeton.edu/article/life-run
  2. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2611742
  3. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/magazine/the-trials-of-alice-goffman.html
  4. http://users.soc.umn.edu/~uggen/Goffman_ASR_09.pdf
  5. https://hceconomics.uchicago.edu/people/alice-goffman
  6. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/04/25/controversy-over-alice-goffman-leads-pomona-students-say-her-alleged-racial
  7. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2015/06/alice-goffmans-on-the-run-is-the-sociologist-to-blame-for-the-inconsistencies-in-her-book.html
  8. https://newrepublic.com/article/121958/sociologist-alice-goffman-denies-murder-conspiracy-run
  9. https://academicweb.nd.edu/~rwilliam/ndonly/readings/SocProblems/03-BlackLivesMatter/Alice%2520Goffman%27s%2520Implausible%2520Ethnography%2520-%2520Aug%25202015.pdf
  10. https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2025/01/21/interrogating-ethnicity-the-alice-goffman-story/
  11. https://cdclv.unlv.edu/ega/articles/delaney_eg_timeline_07-11.pdf
  12. https://www.thoughtco.com/erving-goffman-3026489
  13. https://www.toolshero.com/toolsheroes/erving-goffman/
  14. https://preservedstories.com/2014/05/06/alice-goffmans-on-the-run-studies-policing-in-a-poor-urban-neighborhood-new-york-times-april-29-2014/
  15. https://blog.simplejustice.us/2017/04/25/alice-goffman-from-heroine-to-goat/
  16. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/30/books/alice-goffman-researches-poor-black-men-in-on-the-run.html
  17. https://thesociologicalreview.org/collections/doing-sociology/on-goffman/
  18. https://urban.sas.upenn.edu/urban/news-events/events/31st-annual-public-lecture-alice-goffman
  19. https://thepenngazette.com/down-by-law/
  20. https://www.ted.com/speakers/alice_goffman
  21. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000312240907400301
  22. https://www.thecut.com/2015/06/i-fact-checked-alice-goffman-with-her-subjects.html
  23. https://sociology.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/466/2019/01/Goffman-CV.pdf
  24. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/O/bo18039324.html
  25. https://www.chronicle.com/article/alice-goffmans-implausible-ethnography/
  26. https://www.chronicle.com/article/should-alice-goffmans-work-cost-her-a-faculty-position/
  27. https://apicciano.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2019/06/10/alice-goffman-best-selling-author-denied-tenure-at-u-of-wisconsin-at-madison/
  28. https://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2021/05/looking-back-at-the-goffman-affair
  29. https://ikblc.ubc.ca/law-and-society/alicegoffman/
  30. https://www.amazon.com/Run-Fugitive-Fieldwork-Encounters-Discoveries/dp/022613671X
  31. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/2f05508c-2c5c-4e2a-872f-636e16e5e667/download
  32. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1532708620936994
  33. https://www.terpconnect.umd.edu/~pnc/working/GoffmanComment-06-22-15.pdf
  34. https://press.uchicago.edu/books/excerpt/2014/Goffman_On_the_Run.html
  35. https://faculty.washington.edu/matsueda/courses/517/Readings/Goffman%20ASR%202009.pdf
  36. https://www.asanet.org/communities-and-sections/sections/current-sections/community-and-urban-sociology-award-recipient-history/
  37. https://www.asanet.org/about/awards/dissertation-award/
  38. https://files.eportfolios.macaulay.cuny.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/6914/2020/01/16233258/essentializing-manhood.pdf
  39. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/10/the-society-of-fugitives/379328/
  40. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYy1Q_bbrz0
  41. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/29/books/review/alice-goffmans-on-the-run.html
  42. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18526889-on-the-run
  43. https://newramblerreview.com/book-reviews/law/ethics-on-the-run
  44. https://newrepublic.com/article/121909/did-sociologist-alice-goffman-drive-getaway-car-murder-plot
  45. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/06/02/prof-alice-goffman-on-the-run-and-driving-a-gang-member-around-looking-for-a-mutual-friends-killer/
  46. https://savageminds.org/2015/06/25/committing-crimes-during-fieldwork-ethics-ethnography-and-on-the-run/
  47. https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/slumming-it/
  48. http://www.institutionalreviewblog.com/2015/08/goffman-blames-irb-again.html
  49. https://contexts.org/blog/ethnographers-in-cars-with-guns/
  50. https://www.chronicle.com/article/conflict-over-sociologists-narrative-puts-spotlight-on-ethnography/
  51. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/681934
  52. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2616818
  53. https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/print-archive/defining-flight-risk
  54. https://www.civicresearchinstitute.com/online/PDF/JCC-2803-05-Warrants.pdf
  55. https://cte.rice.edu/blog/2015/teachingthestorm
  56. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=80zk0zgAAAAJ&hl=en
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.