Hubbry Logo
Batting average (cricket)Batting average (cricket)Main
Open search
Batting average (cricket)
Community hub
Batting average (cricket)
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Batting average (cricket)
Batting average (cricket)
Batting average (cricket)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In cricket, a player's batting average is the total number of runs they have scored divided by the number of times they have been out, usually given to two decimal places. Since the number of runs a player scores and how often they get out are primarily measures of their own playing ability, and largely independent of their teammates, batting average is a good metric for an individual player's skill as a batter (although the practice of drawing comparisons between players on this basis is not without criticism[1]). The number is also simple to interpret intuitively. If all the batter's innings were completed (i.e. they were out every innings), this is the average number of runs they score per innings. If they did not complete all their innings (i.e. some innings they finished not out), this number is an estimate of the unknown average number of runs they score per innings.

Each player normally has several batting averages, with a different figure calculated for each type of match they play (first-class, one-day, Test matches, List A, T20, etc.), and a player's batting averages may be calculated for individual seasons or series, or at particular grounds, or against particular opponents, or across their whole career.

Batting average has been used to gauge cricket players' relative skills since the 18th century.

Batting averages are sometimes calculated for whole teams, across a series or tournament.[2][3]

Values

[edit]

Most players have career batting averages in the range of 20 to 40. This is also the desirable range for wicket-keepers, though some fall short and make up for it with keeping skill. Until a substantial increase in scores in the 21st century due to improved bats and smaller grounds among other factors, players who sustained an average above 50 through a career were considered exceptional, and before the development of the heavy roller in the 1870s (which allowed for a flatter, safer cricket pitch) an average of 25 was considered very good.[4]

  • All-rounders who are more prominent bowlers than batsmen typically average something between 20 and 30.
  • 15 and under is typical for specialist bowlers.
  • A small number of players have averaged less than 5 for a complete career, though a player with such an average is a liability unless an exceptional bowler such as Alf Valentine, B. S. Chandrasekhar or Glenn McGrath were.

Career records for batting average are usually subject to a minimum qualification of 20 innings played or completed, in order to exclude batsmen who have not played enough games for their skill to be reliably assessed. Under this qualification, the highest Test batting average belongs to Australia's Sir Donald Bradman, with 99.94. Given that a career batting average over 50 is exceptional, and that only 4 other players have averages over 60, this is an outstanding statistic. The fact that Bradman's average is so far above that of any other cricketer has led several statisticians to argue that, statistically at least, he was the greatest athlete in any sport.[5]

Disregarding this 20 innings qualification, the highest career Test batting average is 144 by Kurtis Patterson, who scored 144 runs and was dismissed once in his two Test innings. He then fell out of the Australian squad due to a loss of form and injury.

Batting averages in One Day International (ODI) and T20 International (T20I) cricket tend to be lower than in Test cricket because of the need to score runs more quickly. Consequently, batters tend to play riskier strokes and less emphasis is placed on building an innings in order to amass a high individual score. It should also be remembered, especially in relation to the ODI and T20I histograms above, that there were no ODI or T20I matches when Bradman played.

Interpretation

[edit]

If a batter has been dismissed in every single innings, then this statistic gives exactly the average number of runs they score per innings.

However, for a batter with one or more innings which finished not out, the true mean or average number of runs they score per innings is unknown as it is not known how many runs they would have scored if they could have completed all their not out innings. In this case, this statistic is an estimate of the average number of runs they score per innings. If their scores have a geometric distribution, then this statistic is the maximum likelihood estimate of their true unknown average.[6]

Batting averages can be strongly affected by the number of not outs. For example, Phil Tufnell, who was noted for his poor batting,[7] has an apparently respectable ODI average of 15 (from 20 games), despite a highest score of only 5 not out, as he scored an overall total of 15 runs from 10 innings, but was out only once.[8]

A batter who was not dismissed in any of the innings over which their average is being calculated does not have a batting average, as division by zero does not give a result.[9]

Leading male batting averages

[edit]

First-class

[edit]
See also: Highest career batting averages in first-class cricket

Highest career batting averages in first-class cricket as follows:

Rank Batter Matches Innings N.O. Runs Highest Ave First Class career
1 Australia Don Bradman 234 338 43 28,067 452* 95.14 1927–49
2 India Vijay Merchant 150 234 46 13,470 359* 71.64 1929–51
3 Cricket West Indies George Headley 103 164 22 9,921 344* 69.86 1927–54
4 India Ajay Sharma 129 166 16 10,120 259* 67.46 1984–2001
5 India Sarfaraz Khan 54 82 12 4,593 301* 65.61 2014–24
6 Australia Bill Ponsford 162 235 23 13,819 437 65.18 1920–34
7 Australia Bill Woodfull 174 245 39 13,388 284 64.99 1921–34
8 India Shantanu Sugwekar 85 122 18 6,563 299* 63.10 1987–2002
9 Sri Lanka Kamindu Mendis 56 87 7 4,920 200* 61.50 2018–25
10 India K. C. Ibrahim 60 89 12 4,716 250 61.24 1938–50
Qualification for inclusion: 50 innings. Names in bold text are current players whose figures are likely to change. * denotes not out. Source: ESPNcricinfo. Last updated: 8 February 2025.

Test matches

[edit]
Don Bradman
See also: Highest career batting averages in Tests

A batting average of above 50 is considered by many as a benchmark to distinguish between a good and a great batsman.[10] Highest male career batting averages in Test matches as follows:

Rank Batter Tests Innings N.O. Runs High Score Average Test career
1 Australia Don Bradman 52 80 10 6,996 334 99.94 1928–48
2 Sri Lanka Kamindu Mendis 12 21 2 1,184 182* 62.31 2022–25
3 Australia Adam Voges 20 31 7 1,485 269* 61.87 2015–16
4 South Africa Graeme Pollock 23 41 4 2,256 274 60.97 1963–70
5 Cricket West Indies George Headley 22 40 4 2,190 270* 60.83 1930–54
6 England Herbert Sutcliffe 54 84 9 4,555 194 60.73 1924–35
7 England Eddie Paynter 20 31 5 1,540 243 59.23 1931–39
8 England Ken Barrington 82 131 15 6,806 256 58.67 1955–68
9 Cricket West Indies Everton Weekes 48 81 5 4,455 207 58.61 1948–58
10 England Harry Brook 24 40 1 2,281 317 58.48 2022–24
Qualification for inclusion: 20 innings. Names in bold text are current players whose figures are likely to change. * denotes not out. Source: ESPNcricinfo. Last updated: 8 February 2025.

One Day Internationals

[edit]
See also: Highest career batting averages in ODIs

Highest career batting averages in One Day International cricket as follows:

Rank Batter ODIs Innings N.O. Runs Highest Ave ODI career
1 Netherlands Ryan ten Doeschate 33 32 9 1541 119 67.00 2006–11
2 India Shubman Gill 55 55 8 2,775 208 59.04 2019–25
3 India Virat Kohli 302 290 45 14,181 183 57.88 2008–25
4 England Dawid Malan 30 30 4 1,450 140 55.76 2019–23
5 Pakistan Babar Azam 128 125 15 6,106 158 55.50 2015–25
6 Australia Michael Bevan 232 196 67 6,912 108* 53.58 1994–2004
7 South Africa AB de Villiers 228 218 39 9,577 176 53.50 2005–18
8 England Jonathan Trott 68 65 10 2,819 137 51.25 2009–13
9 India MS Dhoni 350 297 84 10,773 183* 50.57 2004–19
10 England Ben Duckett 22 22 1 1,058 165 50.38 2016–25
Qualification for inclusion: 20 innings. Names in bold text are current players whose figures are likely to change. * denotes not out. Source: ESPNcricinfo. Last updated: 9 March 2025

T20 Internationals

[edit]
See also: Highest career batting averages in T20Is
Rank Batsmen T20Is Innings N.O. Runs Highest Ave T20I career
1 Malawi Sami Sohail 46 42 18 1,347 94* 56.12 2019–24
2 India Tilak Varma 25 24 9 749 120* 49.93 2023–25
3 India Virat Kohli 125 117 31 4,188 122* 48.69 2010–24
4 Pakistan Mohammad Rizwan 106 93 21 3,414 104* 47.41 2015–24
5 Japan Kendel Kadowaki-Fleming 35 35 4 1,420 114 45.80 2022–24
6 India Manish Pandey 39 33 17 709 79* 44.31 2015–20
7 Qatar Muhammad Tanveer 61 57 16 1,781 88* 43.43 2019–24
8 India Rinku Singh 33 24 11 546 69* 42.00 2023–25
9 France Gustav McKeon 20 20 1 785 109 41.31 2022–24
10 Czech Republic Sabawoon Davizi 32 31 3 1,149 115* 41.03 2019–24
Qualification for inclusion: 20 innings. Names in bold text are current players whose figures are likely to change. * denotes not out. Source: ESPNcricinfo. Last updated: 2 February 2025.

Leading female batting averages

[edit]

Test matches

[edit]
See also: List of women's Test cricket records § Individual records (batting)
Rank Batter Tests Innings N.O. Runs High Score Average Test career
1 Australia Denise Annetts 10 13 3 819 193 81.90 1987–92
2 India Shafali Verma 5 10 1 567 205 63.00 2021–24
3 Australia Lorraine Hill 7 10 2 499 118* 62.37 1975–77
4 England Enid Bakewell 12 22 4 1,078 124 59.88 1968–79
5 Australia Belinda Haggett 10 15 2 762 144 58.61 1987–92
6 Australia Ellyse Perry 14 23 7 930 213* 58.12 2008–25
7 Australia Betty Wilson 11 16 1 862 127 57.46 1948–58
8 India Smriti Mandhana 7 12 1 629 149 57.18 2014–24
9 Australia Karen Rolton 14 22 4 1,002 209* 55.66 1995–2009
10 New Zealand Debbie Hockley 19 29 4 1,301 126* 52.04 1979–96
Qualification for inclusion: 10 innings. Names in bold text are current players whose figures are likely to change. * denotes not out. Source: ESPNcricinfo. Last updated: 2 February 2025

One Day Internationals

[edit]
See also: List of women's One Day International cricket records § Highest career average
Rank Batter ODIs Innings N.O. Runs Highest Ave. ODI Career
1 England Rachael Heyhoe Flint 23 20 9 643 114 58.45 1973–82
2 Australia Lindsay Reeler 23 23 5 1,034 143* 57.44 1984–88
3 Australia Meg Lanning 103 102 16 4,602 152* 53.51 2011–23
4 Australia Bronwyn Calver 34 21 11 534 81* 53.40 1991–98
5 India Mithali Raj 232 211 57 7,805 125* 50.68 1999–2022
6 South Africa Laura Wolvaardt 101 100 14 4,303 184* 50.03 2016–24
7 Australia Ellyse Perry 155 128 42 4,187 112* 48.68 2007–25
8 Australia Karen Rolton 141 132 32 4,814 154* 48.14 1995–2009
9 England Wendy Watson 23 22 6 768 107* 48.00 1987–93
10 Australia Belinda Clark 118 114 12 4,844 229* 47.49 1991–2005
Qualification for inclusion: 20 innings. Names in bold text are current players whose figures are likely to change. * denotes not out. Source: ESPNcricinfo. Correct to 17 January 2025.

T20 Internationals

[edit]
See also: List of women's Twenty20 International records § Highest career average
Rank Batter T20Is Innings N.O. Runs Highest Ave. T20I Career
1 Isle of Man Lucy Barnett 21 20 9 742 96 67.45 2022–24
2 Australia Tahlia McGrath 53 41 14 1,124 91* 41.62 2021–25
3 Australia Beth Mooney 109 103 25 3,215 117* 41.21 2016–25
4 Germany Christina Gough 42 40 12 1,096 101* 39.14 2019–24
5 Indonesia Ni Luh Dewi 26 21 7 529 78 37.78 2023–24
6 India Mithali Raj 89 84 21 2,364 97* 37.52 2006–19
7 Scotland Kathryn Bryce 49 47 13 1,273 73* 37.44 2018–24
8 Indonesia Ni Putu Ayu Nanda Sakarini 42 37 11 968 95* 37.23 2019–24
9 Australia Meg Lanning 132 121 28 3,405 133* 36.61 2010–23
10 Netherlands Sterre Kalis 44 44 6 1,358 126* 35.73 2018–25
Qualification for inclusion: 20 innings. Names in bold text are current players whose figures are likely to change. * denotes not out. Source: ESPNcricinfo. Correct to 7 February 2025.

Alternatives

[edit]

Alternative measures of batting effectiveness have been developed, including:

Strike rate

[edit]
Main article: Strike rate

Strike rate measures a different concept to batting average – how quickly the batsman scores (i.e. average number of runs from 100 balls) – so it does not supplant the role of batting average. It is used particularly in limited overs matches, where the speed at which a batter scores is more important than it is in first-class cricket. Strike rate may also be used to compare a player's ability to score runs against differing types of bowling (i.e. spin, fast bowling).

Player rankings

[edit]
Main article: ICC Player Rankings

A system of player rankings was developed to produce a better indication of players' current standings than is provided by comparing their averages.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Batting average (cricket)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In cricket, the batting average is a fundamental statistic that quantifies a batsman's performance by dividing the total runs scored by the number of times the batsman has been dismissed, excluding not-out innings from the denominator. This yields the average runs per dismissal, providing a measure of consistency and reliability at the crease. Widely applied across all formats—Test matches, One Day Internationals (ODIs), and (T20) cricket—the batting average serves as a primary indicator of a player's skill and contribution to the team. In , where endurance is paramount, elite averages often exceed 50, with holding the all-time record of 99.94 from 52 matches between 1928 and 1948, a benchmark unmatched in over a century of the game. In limited-overs formats, averages are typically lower due to aggressive play, but figures above 40 remain exceptional, reflecting the balance between run-scoring and wicket preservation. Despite its prominence, the batting average has notable limitations, as not-out dismissals—common for tail-enders or in unfinished innings—do not penalize the denominator, potentially inflating figures for players with fewer opportunities to bat fully. This has prompted discussions and alternative metrics, such as (runs per 100 balls faced) or weighted averages that adjust for context like opposition strength and match conditions, to offer a more holistic view of batting prowess. Nonetheless, it remains a cornerstone of analysis, influencing selections, rankings, and historical legacies.

Fundamentals

Definition

In cricket, serves as a fundamental to quantify a batsman's and consistency at the crease. It represents the number of runs scored per dismissal, where dismissals exclude instances when a batsman remains at the end of an . This metric highlights a player's to accumulate runs before being removed by the side, providing a snapshot of their effectiveness in contributing to the team's total score. Distinct from the batting average in , which measures hits per official at-bat and focuses on contact efficiency in a shorter format, cricket's version incorporates not outs to reflect the game's emphasis on endurance and management rather than rapid plate appearances. In , prerequisites include tracking runs scored (the points accumulated via boundaries, singles, and other strokes), played (each turn batting for a team), and dismissals (such as , , or lbw). For an individual batsman, the applies across spans or seasonal performances, offering insight into sustained output; for instance, a average aggregates all qualifying runs and dismissals to gauge long-term reliability.

Calculation

The batting average in cricket is calculated by dividing the total runs scored by a batsman by the number of times they have been dismissed, which is equivalent to the total innings batted minus the number of not outs. The formula is expressed as: Batting average=Total runs scoredInnings batted−Not outs\text{Batting average} = \frac{\text{Total runs scored}}{\text{Innings batted} - \text{Not outs}} This value is rounded to two decimal places for presentation in official statistics. The subtraction of not outs from the denominator accounts for unfinished innings, where the batsman is not dismissed but the innings concludes due to the match ending, , or other circumstances. According to the governed by the (MCC), a batsman is only considered out through one of the ten specified modes of dismissal (such as , caught, or ); otherwise, the innings remains incomplete, and excluding these prevents unfair penalization of consistent performers who often bat lower in the order and survive to the end. In edge cases, if a batsman has zero dismissals across their innings (all not outs), the average is mathematically infinite and is conventionally denoted by an asterisk (*) in scorecards or listed as the total runs scored with a note of "batting not out," as no division is possible. For official career batting averages in , a minimum qualification of 20 batted is typically required to ensure statistical reliability and exclude players with limited exposure. To illustrate, consider a hypothetical batsman who scores 500 runs over 10 , including 2 not outs: the number of dismissals is 10 - 2 = 8, yielding an of 500 / 8 = 62.50. The same formula applies to both seasonal (e.g., aggregating runs and dismissals over a single tournament) and career calculations, simply scaling the totals accordingly. This method remains consistent across all formats, from Tests to T20s, without variation.

Significance

Interpretation

In cricket, the batting average serves as a primary indicator of a player's skill and reliability, reflecting the runs scored per dismissal and thus providing a normalized measure of scoring efficiency over multiple innings. An average exceeding 50 in Test matches is widely regarded as elite or world-class, signifying exceptional consistency and the ability to anchor innings against high-quality bowling; averages between 30 and 40 denote solid performers capable of contributing meaningfully, while those below 20 suggest poor output relative to international standards. In shorter formats like One-Day Internationals and T20s, averages are generally lower due to the emphasis on quicker scoring and higher dismissal risks, requiring adjustments in interpretation to account for the compressed nature of play. Several contextual factors influence the interpretation of batting averages, underscoring that raw figures must be evaluated against specific conditions. Pitch characteristics, such as seam-friendly surfaces or spin-assisting tracks, can suppress scoring and lower averages, while flat pitches inflate them; for instance, recent years have seen tougher conditions leading to reduced overall averages. Opposition strength plays a key role, with performances against top-tier attacks warranting higher regard than those against weaker sides, and home advantage often boosts averages due to familiar conditions compared to away games. Additionally, career stage and batting position affect expectations: openers facing the new ball typically endure more pressure and may have slightly lower averages than middle-order players, who benefit from established partnerships, though lower-order batsmen are judged more leniently given their defensive roles. Despite its utility, the batting average has notable limitations in fully assessing skill, as it overlooks match impact, consistency across innings, and the context of run accumulation. It emphasizes total output per dismissal but fails to capture whether runs were scored in pressure situations or contributed to victories, nor does it reflect variability—many players with high averages rely on occasional big scores amid frequent low ones, with the median Test innings yielding only around 13 runs. For a more holistic view, especially in limited-overs cricket, it is often paired with , which measures scoring speed and addresses the average's silence on tempo and situational demands like required run rates. Interpretations of batting averages have evolved significantly since the , driven by the rise of T20 , which prioritizes aggression and boundary-hitting over patient accumulation, leading to a shift in how is valued. Post-, Test batting averages peaked in the mid-to-late decade before declining due to improved bowling tactics and more challenging pitches, while limited-overs formats saw heightened emphasis on strike rates as T20 liberated batters to attack from the outset, reducing the premium on ultra-high averages. Compared to raw runs scored, which highlight cumulative volume but ignore the number of opportunities (e.g., a player with many not-outs may amass high totals without proportional risk), the average better illustrates long-term performance by penalizing frequent dismissals and rewarding resilience.

Typical Values

In Test cricket, typical career batting averages for specialist batsmen range from 20 to 60, with most qualified players (minimum 20 ) falling between 30 and 40, reflecting the format's emphasis on and adaptability to varying conditions. The all-time overall batting average (total runs per dismissal) across all Test stands at approximately 32 as of 2025. In One-Day Internationals (ODIs), averages typically span 25 to 45 for career figures, with the overall average around 32. T20 Internationals see lower ranges of 15 to 30, as the format prioritizes over prolonged accumulation, leading to more volatile performances, with an overall average of about 22. First-class cricket, encompassing domestic competitions like , features typical career averages of 25 to 50, though international players often outperform domestic ones due to superior preparation and opposition. averages are generally 10 to 15 points lower than Test equivalents, averaging around 25 to 35 in Division One, owing to bowler-friendly English conditions and variable weather. At club level, averages range from 20 to 35, where a figure above 30 is considered respectable for regular contributors, factoring in amateur standards and irregular play. Trends across genders show broadly similar ranges, though women's averages are slightly lower (typically 20 to 40) due to fewer matches and historically less frequent play, with an overall average of about 28 as of 2025. Post-2020, batting averages have remained stable around 30-32 in major formats, with fluctuations due to varying pitch conditions and the impacts of the , which disrupted training and schedules but did not cause a uniform quantifiable drop in performance metrics.
FormatTypical Career RangeOverall Average (as of 2025)
Test20-60~32
ODI25-45~32
T20I15-30~22
25-50~30

Records by Gender and Format

Men's First-Class

In first-class cricket, matches are typically played over three to five days with no restrictions on the number of overs, emphasizing batsmen's endurance, concentration, and adaptability to varying conditions and attacks. This format, encompassing domestic leagues, county championships, and representative games, rewards consistent run-scoring over extended periods, with batting averages serving as a key measure of a player's . Qualification for career averages generally requires a minimum of 20 to filter out limited-exposure performances and provide meaningful statistical context. The all-time highest batting averages in men's highlight exceptional talents from the early , often achieved in eras with fewer high-speed bowlers and more batsman-friendly pitches. holds the record with an unparalleled 95.14 average across 234 innings from 1927 to 1948, a figure that remains unmatched due to his revolutionary technique and dominance. Other luminaries include at 69.86 (270 innings, 1927-1954) and Bill Ponsford at 65.18 (162 innings, 1920-1934), both exemplifying mastery in pre-World War II conditions.
RankPlayerAverageInningsSpan
195.142341927-1948
269.862701927-1954
3Bill Ponsford (Australia)65.181621920-1934
4Percy Holmes (England)60.934991913-1935
5Kumar Shri Ranjitsinhji (England)56.333071893-1920
6Eddie Paynter (England)47.99991931-1951
755.522681937-1955
(Note: Table based on minimum 20 innings; data compiled from authoritative cricket statistics databases as of October 2024.) Historical trends reveal a stark contrast between pre-World War II eras, where averages frequently exceeded 50 due to slower pitches and less aggressive bowling, and modern times, where improved fast bowling techniques, flatter tracks in some regions, and the influence of limited-overs cricket have contributed to a general decline. For instance, peak batting averages in the 1930s and 1940s often surpassed those of the post-2000 period, with overall first-class figures dipping notably since the late 2000s amid faster outfields and specialized seam attacks. This shift underscores the evolving balance between bat and ball, with contemporary averages rarely reaching the highs of earlier generations. Notable achievements in first-class batting often span decades and diverse team contexts, such as in versus subcontinental domestic competitions. Javed Miandad maintained an average above 50 (52.34 across 632 innings from 1972 to 1996) over a 25-year career, blending resilience in Karachi's domestic circuit with stints in county sides like , where he adapted to seaming conditions. Similarly, players like sustained high averages (around 50) in both West Indian domestic games and , highlighting the format's demand for versatility across pitches and oppositions. As of October 2024, current leaders reflect this modern challenge while showcasing emerging talents; Indian batsman tops active players with a career of 60.42 (from 120 ), bolstered by prolific domestic performances in the over the last five years (avg >75). , with a career of 50.22 across 406 , continues to exemplify endurance in county and international domestic fixtures, recently crossing 18,700 first-class runs without retirement, solidifying his status among active greats. Pakistani youngster Azan Awais has also surged into contention, achieving recent hundreds in the 2024-25 , contributing to a promising early career above 50 in limited first-class exposure.

Men's Test Matches

In men's Test cricket, the batting average serves as a primary indicator of a batsman's endurance and proficiency in the game's most demanding format, where matches can span up to five days and involve prolonged defensive play against diverse conditions and bowling strategies. Top performers excel by occupying the crease for extended periods, converting starts into substantial scores amid the format's inherent attrition, which favors consistency over aggressive strokeplay. Unlike shorter formats, Test averages often cluster around 40-50 for elite players, with outliers highlighting exceptional dominance. The all-time highest career Test batting average belongs to Australia's Sir Don Bradman, who recorded 99.94 across 80 in 52 matches from 1928 to 1948, a figure unmatched by any other player qualifying under the standard minimum of 20 . Bradman achieved this milestone as the first—and remains the only—batsman to surpass a 100 average, amassing 6,996 runs including 29 centuries, which underscores his unparalleled run-scoring efficiency. His dominance is evident in the vast gap to the next best, with no other qualifier exceeding 62, illustrating the rarity of such sustained excellence in an era of uncovered pitches and less protective equipment. The following table lists the top 10 all-time batting averages for men (minimum 20 ), reflecting historical peaks in consistency:
RankPlayerCountryAverageSpan
1DG BradmanAUS99.94801928-1948
2AC VogesAUS61.87312015-2016
3RG PollockSA60.97411963-1970
4H SutcliffeENG60.73841924-1935
5GA HeadleyWI60.09401930-1954
6E PaynterENG59.23311931-1939
7KF BarringtonENG58.671681955-1968
8ED WeekesWI58.661681947-1958
9WR HammondENG58.451401928-1957
10J RyderAUS58.25331920-1929
These figures, current as of October 2024, highlight players who thrived in pre-modern eras of slower scoring but fiercer physical demands. Historical shifts, such as the 1932-33 series, demonstrate how tactical controversies could alter averages even for legends like Bradman, whose series mark of 56.57—well below his career norm—stemmed from England's aggressive short-pitched bowling aimed at curbing his dominance, sparking debates on fair play and influencing subsequent rule changes. This period exemplifies the format's evolution, where high averages reflect not just skill but adaptation to adversarial strategies and deteriorating pitches. Among active players qualifying with at least 20 innings as of October 2024, Australia's Steve Smith tops the list at 56.97 over 195 , bolstered by his technical versatility and recent resurgence. England's follows at 50.22 over 148 , while New Zealand's holds 54.31 over 184 , both exemplifying modern endurance in seaming conditions. India's has experienced a post-2023 decline to 46.85 across 197 , with lean spells yielding sub-30 averages in key series, attributed to form slumps and tactical mismatches in his later career. Pakistan's , with a trajectory hovering around 42.90 from 4,366 runs in 112 , shows potential for elevation but has faced inconsistency, including modest returns against pace-heavy attacks. These trajectories illustrate the pressures of sustaining high averages amid aging, workload, and format-specific challenges. Milestones in men's Test averages include Bradman's singular 100-plus mark and the select group of 22 players exceeding 50 overall, a threshold denoting status; additionally, several like Smith and have recorded multiple 50-plus seasonal averages, emphasizing repeated high-impact campaigns in the attrition-heavy format.

Men's One-Day Internationals

In men's One-Day Internationals (ODIs), batting averages reflect a player's ability to accumulate runs under the pressure of a 50-over format, where aggressive scoring is balanced against preservation. Unlike longer formats, ODI averages are generally lower due to the emphasis on strike rates, but top performers often exceed 50, particularly those batting in the middle order who benefit from established partnerships and older balls. Career typically require a minimum of 20 for qualification to filter out small-sample anomalies. The highest career batting averages showcase specialists in the format, with ' Ryan ten Doeschate leading at 67.33 from 25 innings, followed by India's at 58.07 over 299 innings and over 13,000 runs. Other notables include Pakistan's (56.92 from 120 innings) and England's (55.31 from 29 innings), who capitalized on middle-order roles for protected starts.
RankPlayerTeamSpanInningsRunsAverage
1NED2006-2011251,67867.33
2IND2008-202429913,90658.07
3PAK2015-20241205,72956.92
4IND2019-2024582,81856.36
5ENG2017-2024291,60455.31
6AUS1994-20042706,91253.58
7Heinrich van der DussenSA2019-2024692,14152.91
8SA2008-20191818,11349.46
9ENG2013-20241676,51647.65
10NZ2010-20241456,81047.00
Table based on minimum 20 innings; data as of 2024. Post-2015, ODI batting averages have trended upward, rising from around 35-40 for top-order batsmen in earlier cycles to over 39 by the 2015-2019 period, driven by flatter pitches, advanced bats, and tactical shifts favoring aggressive play—evident in run rates peaking at 5.50 per over in 2015. This evolution amplified during s, where high-stakes conditions on prepared surfaces boosted performances; for instance, in the 2023 ODI , posted a average of 95.62 across 11 , scoring 765 runs and highlighting the format's potential for exceptional averages in major events. Notable series records underscore individual dominance, such as Sachin Tendulkar's 98.50 average in the 2003 bilateral series against , where he amassed 401 runs in four without dismissal. By late 2024, updates reflect ongoing careers, including Rohit Sharma's continued participation (average 48.63 over 262 ).

Men's T20 Internationals

In Men's T20 Internationals (T20Is), batting averages reflect the format's emphasis on aggressive scoring within a limited 20-over , where powerplays allow only two fielders outside the 30-yard circle for the first six overs, boosting early run rates but introducing high variance due to the risk of quick dismissals. Typical averages hover lower than in longer formats, often between 20 and 30 for established players, owing to the pressure to accelerate and the format's volatility, though elite performers can sustain figures above 40 with consistent contributions. This subtopic focuses on leading averages, evolutionary trends, and key influences like league exposure and major tournaments. The highest career batting averages in Men's T20Is, qualified by a minimum of 20 , highlight players who balance consistency with explosiveness. As of October 2024, of leads retired players with an average of 48.69 from 125 and 4,188 runs. Among active, holds ~40 from 70+ through aggressive middle-order play. Other top performers include at 41.10 from 60 . The top 10, per records, is summarized below (minimum 20 , qualified players only):
RankPlayerCountryInningsRunsAverageStrike RateSource
1IND1254,18848.69137ESPNcricinfo
2IND602,26541.10140ESPNcricinfo
3Mohammad RizwanPAK923,12339.04129ESPNcricinfo
4PAK1314,14539.65130ESPNcricinfo
5Philip SaltENG501,800+38.00165ESPNcricinfo
6IND1535455.00145ESPNcricinfo
7IND1594,23131.75140ESPNcricinfo
8BAN100+1,54220.03125ESPNcricinfo
9ENG1203,38135.72145ESPNcricinfo
10David MillerSA1102,50832.50140ESPNcricinfo
These figures underscore the format's demand for adaptability, with strike rates above 130 correlating to higher averages among top players. Batting averages in T20Is have climbed since the format's in 2005, evolving from lottery-like unpredictability—where early averages rarely exceeded 25—to more consistent mid-30s for leading teams by the , driven by improved techniques and flatter pitches. This progression reflects batsmen's growing proficiency in power-hitting, with global averages rising from 22 in 2005-2010 to around 28 by 2020-2024, per HowSTAT analysis. Rule changes in the , such as larger square boundaries introduced in the and T20 World Cups to curb excessive six-hitting, temporarily moderated scoring but ultimately prompted innovations like lofted covers drives, sustaining the upward trend. The (IPL) has significantly influenced T20I batting statistics by exposing international players to high-scoring environments, elevating global strike rates and averages through cross-pollination of aggressive tactics. Studies indicate IPL matches maintain the highest T20 quality, with participants like transferring boundary-hitting prowess to T20Is, contributing to a 10-15% rise in sixes per since 2010. This league effect is evident in 2024 rankings, where IPL-contracted openers like Philip Salt exhibit T20I averages 5-7 points higher than non-IPL peers. The 2024 T20 World Cup further impacted averages, with co-hosts and posting team batting figures above 30—higher than the tournament's 25.5 mean—thanks to dew-assisted second and bold top-order strategies, as seen in Rohit Sharma's 191 runs at 159 . This event spurred adjustments, with players like boosting their averages through emulated powerplay aggression, per ICC stats. Pioneers like profoundly shaped T20I averages by redefining power-hitting, amassing 1,899 runs at 27.92 with 14 fifties and two centuries, including the format's first T20I hundred in , which normalized 50+ scores and elevated acceptable averages through six-heavy innings. His influence persists, inspiring players to prioritize impact overs, thereby sustaining the format's climbing average trajectory.

Women's Test Matches

Women's Test cricket remains a rare format compared to limited-overs internationals, with only 149 matches played across all nations since , reflecting the challenges of multi-day play including weather disruptions, pitch preparation, and scheduling priorities for emerging professional structures. Due to the limited opportunities—many players have fewer than 10 —batting average records typically qualify players with a minimum of 10 to ensure meaningful comparisons, emphasizing consistency over volume. This threshold highlights the format's demands, where , technique against seam and spin over extended periods, and adaptability to variable conditions distinguish top performers. The format experienced a revival in the post-2010s era, driven by professionalization through central contracts in nations like , , and , which improved fitness, skills, and tactical depth, leading to rising batting averages as players gained more exposure. Prior to this, Tests were sporadic, often limited to bilateral series between established teams like and , but the influx of funding and multi-format contests from 2019 onward encouraged broader participation. This growth has seen emerging nations such as and play more Tests, fostering competitive multi-day cricket; for instance, 's historic first Test win against in 2022 marked a milestone for non-traditional powerhouses, while 's multi-day domestic revival in the mid-2010s supported international progress. Averages have trended upward, with modern players benefiting from better coaching and , contrasting earlier eras where status constrained preparation. Early milestones include Enid Bakewell's pioneering 59.88 average in the 1960s-1970s, one of the first to surpass 50, setting a benchmark during the Edwards era of the late 1990s-2000s when England's captain averaged near 50 across 19 Tests, symbolizing the shift toward sustained high performance amid growing international fixtures. In recent years, the format's resurgence is evident in series like the 2023 Women's Ashes Test at , where Australia defeated England by 89 runs with standout batting from (39 and 31 not out), and India's 1-0 series win over England at , boosted by Shafali Verma's 96 on debut. The 2023-2024 season also featured Australia's dominant nine-wicket victory over South Africa in Perth, showcasing elevated standards, while 2024's India-South Africa Test in ended in a draw but highlighted Mandhana's emergence with consistent scores. By 2024, players like have progressed toward elite averages, her 38.50 reflecting India's rising prowess in multi-day cricket against stronger opposition. The all-time leaders in batting average (minimum 10 innings) underscore the format's historical depth, with Australian players dominating due to earlier series volume:
RankPlayerCountrySpanMatchesInningsNot OutsRunsHighest ScoreAverage
1Denise AnnettsAUS1985-19921013381919381.90
2IND2021-2024510156720563.00
3Lorraine HillAUS1975-19777102499118*62.37
4ENG1968-197912224107812459.88
5Belinda HaggettAUS1987-19921015276214458.61
6AUS2008-202414237930213*58.12
7IND2014-2024712162914957.18
These figures illustrate how professionalization has enabled contemporary players like and Mandhana to challenge historical benchmarks, with Perry's unbeaten 213 against in 2017 exemplifying the format's potential for transformative .

Women's One-Day Internationals

In Women's One-Day Internationals (ODIs), batting averages reflect the format's emphasis on steady accumulation over 50 overs, allowing top performers to maintain consistency across numerous matches. The qualification for leading averages typically requires a minimum of 20 to ensure meaningful statistical reliability. As of October 2024, elite batters consistently achieve averages above 40, a benchmark boosted by the longer format's opportunities for building compared to shorter games. This threshold highlights the skill required to anchor partnerships and rotate strike effectively against varied attacks. The highest career batting averages in Women's ODIs showcase a mix of veterans and emerging talents, with recent updates incorporating performances from bilateral series, the 2024 , and the ICC . of India leads active players with an average of 48.23 across 117 innings (5,748 runs), her consistent opening contributions solidified by strong showings in 2023-2024 series against and . Close behind is South Africa's , who holds 51.05 from 104 innings (4,184 runs) as of 2024. India's retired captain ended her career in 2022 with 50.68 from 211 innings and 7,805 runs, a record that stood as the pinnacle for over two decades. Other prominent figures include Australia's , with 37.50 from 140+ matches, her all-round prowess enabling prolonged batting stints, and England's , averaging 45.60 in 110 matches before stepping back from captaincy in 2023, though she continues playing. The following table summarizes select top performers (minimum 20 innings, active or recently retired as of 2024):
RankPlayerTeamSpanMatchesInningsRunsAverage
1SA-W2016-20241041044,18451.05
2IND-W1999-20222322117,80550.68
3IND-W2013-20241171175,74848.23
4ENG-W2013-2024110994,36945.60
5AUS-W2007-20241691525,00234.79
These figures underscore how sustained exposure in the 50-over format favors accumulators, with averages rarely dipping below 40 for the global elite due to fewer extreme pressures than in T20s. The landscape of Women's ODI batting has evolved significantly since the 2017 ICC Women's , which marked a "" by boosting participation, viewership, and investment in the sport, particularly in where domestic pathways expanded dramatically. This surge led to more bilateral series and tournaments post-2017, increasing match volume and allowing batters to refine techniques for longer ; for instance, global ODI run rates rose to 4.84 per over since the 2022 , the highest in any cycle. The introduction of professional domestic leagues like the Women's Premier League (WPL) in 2023 further elevated standards, fostering fearless batting through high-stakes exposure and financial incentives, resulting in improved ODI performances against top teams—India's white-ball success against the top four nations notably strengthened. By 2024, WPL's influence was evident in bilaterals, where batters like Wolvaardt scored consistently. Notable series highs illustrate peak performances within this growing ecosystem. For example, Ellyse Perry achieved an average exceeding 60 in Australia's 2019 ODI series against New Zealand, scoring 214 runs across two innings (107 and 107*) at 113.00, showcasing her ability to dominate in multi-format tours. Such outliers, combined with data from 2022-2024 bilaterals like India-South Africa and the Asia Cup, have refined average calculations, emphasizing resilience in high-volume schedules. Overall, Women's ODIs continue to prioritize averages in the 40-50 range as a measure of class, with ongoing growth ensuring more opportunities for record-breaking consistency.

Women's T20 Internationals

In Women's T20 Internationals (T20Is), batting averages reflect the format's emphasis on aggressive scoring within a limited 20-over , where players must balance risk and consistency to contribute to team totals often exceeding 150 runs. Top career averages, calculated with a qualification of at least 20 , typically range from 25 to 35, lower than in longer formats due to the pressure of quick dismissals and higher fall rates. Leading performers include of , who holds ~24.7 average across 100+ matches (2008-2024), highlighted by her explosive 90 on debut and consistent middle-order contributions. The format's dynamics favor batswomen who combine high strike rates (often above 120) with solid averages, as evidenced by correlations between the two metrics in player profiles; for instance, Ellyse Perry's 29.48 average pairs with a 121 strike rate over 140 matches, enabling her all-round impact in high-pressure chases. Recent inclusions like England's Danni Wyatt-Hodge demonstrate sustained consistency, maintaining a career average of 24.09 across 151 matches (2010-2024) while excelling in bilateral series and World Cups with strike rates exceeding 130 in 2023-2024. Trends show averages rising alongside overall run rates, from 5.84 runs per over pre-2017 to 6.25 thereafter, driven by improved technique, flatter pitches, and power-hitting. This evolution is pronounced during T20 s, where competitive stakes amplify performances; in the 2023 edition hosted by , Australia's dominance included Beth Mooney's tournament average of 51.50, supporting their unbeaten run to the title with team totals like 190/5 against . Post-2023, the 2024 in the UAE saw elevated individual marks, such as Nat Sciver-Brunt's 107.00 average for and Laura Wolvaardt's 223 runs at 37.17 for , amid New Zealand's championship win, with qualifiers in 2024 further boosting global averages through expanded participation. Impact players like peaked at averages above 30 in cycles prior to her 2023 retirement (overall T20I avg 28.98 from 90 ), underscoring how the format rewards adaptability in events that popularize .

Alternatives

Strike Rate

Strike rate in cricket is a key performance metric for batsmen that quantifies their scoring efficiency relative to the number of deliveries faced, calculated using the formula: strike rate = (runs scored / balls faced) × 100. This differs fundamentally from , which emphasizes consistency by dividing total runs by dismissals and overlooks the temporal aspect of duration. By focusing on runs per 100 balls, strike rate addresses average's limitation in ignoring balls faced, providing insight into a batsman's to accelerate scoring under pressure. As an alternative to average, emerged as a vital statistic in the alongside the rise of aggressive play in One-Day Internationals (ODIs), where it helped evaluate batsmen's contribution to team run rates in limited-overs formats. Ideal strike rates vary by format: in Test matches, values around 40-60 reflect patient accumulation suited to longer games; in ODIs, 80-100 balances risk and reward for 50-over ; and in T20s, 120 or higher is prized for explosive, boundary-heavy scoring. These benchmarks highlight strike rate's role in adapting to format-specific demands, where higher values indicate faster scoring without excessive risk. The interplay between high batting average and high strike rate defines a "complete" batsman capable of both endurance and acceleration, a trend amplified in 2024-2025 analyses of T20 leagues like the IPL, where players maintaining averages above 30 with s over 140 have driven team successes amid evolving tactics. In T20 cricket, post-2020 rule changes such as the Impact Player substitution introduced in 2023 have further elevated s, enabling deeper batting lineups and boosting overall run rates by approximately 13% in affected tournaments. This evolution underscores 's growing importance in modern cricket, complementing average to assess holistic performance.

Batting Rankings

Batting rankings in cricket provide a dynamic assessment of players' current form and overall effectiveness, often incorporating as a key factor alongside other metrics like runs scored against quality opposition and match context. The (ICC) maintains the most prominent official system, which uses a points-based formula to rank batsmen across formats and genders, emphasizing recent performances to reflect contemporary skill levels rather than lifetime achievements. The ICC rankings originated from a 1987 proposal by former captain to create a more nuanced indicator of player standing beyond traditional averages, with the modern system launching in the early as a guide to current form rather than career evaluation. These rankings evolved from earlier lists focused solely on batting averages, incorporating advanced calculations to account for variables such as opposition strength, home/away conditions, and pressure. The methodology applies a time-decay factor, where points from recent matches (within the last three to four years, depending on the format) carry greater weight, ensuring rankings prioritize recency while format-specific adjustments distinguish between , One-Day International (ODI), and Twenty20 International () cricket. Gender-separated rankings maintain equity, with women's lists calculated similarly but based on fewer fixtures in due to its limited schedule. Batting average contributes indirectly through performance points, where higher averages in challenging scenarios boost overall ratings. As of November 2024 (latest available update), the ICC men's Test batting rankings highlight England's at the top with 908 points, followed closely by teammates (868) and New Zealand's (850), underscoring the value of consistent high averages in endurance formats.
RankPlayerTeamRating
1ENG908
2ENG868
3NZ850
4Steve SmithAUS816
5IND791
6IND785
7Daryl MitchellNZ772
8ENG758
9AUS740
10ENG747
In men's ODIs, India's leads with 781 points, reflecting his explosive averages in limited-overs chases, ahead of Afghanistan's (764).
RankPlayerTeamRating
1IND781
2AFG764
3Daryl MitchellNZ746
4IND745
5IND725
6PAK722
7IRE710
8David WarnerAUS698
9SA685
10SL669
The men's T20I rankings are topped by India's Abhishek Sharma (920 points), emphasizing strike-integrated averages in the shortest format.
RankPlayerTeamRating
1Abhishek SharmaIND920
2ENG849
3SL779
4ENG770
5IND761
6AUS727
7IND715
8SA702
9Glenn PhillipsNZ690
10WI678
For women, ODI rankings feature South Africa's at No. 1 (814 points) after her dominant World Cup 2025 performances, with India's (811) in second, where career averages above 50 play a pivotal role in point accumulation.
RankPlayerTeamRating
1SA814
2IND811
3AUS738
4ENG714
5AUS700
6AUS692
7IND702
8WI698
9NZ685
10AUS672
Women's T20I rankings are led by Australia's (794 points), with rankings favoring players who maintain high averages under aggressive scoring demands. Women's Test rankings, updated less frequently due to sparse matches, currently place players like Australia's or England's at the top, with ratings around 800-850 points prioritizing longevity in averages over short-term bursts (exact figures vary with limited recent Tests). Alternative systems include ESPNcricinfo's player ratings, which complement ICC metrics by using contextual algorithms like Smart Stats to evaluate batting impact, factoring in pitch conditions, opposition quality, and relative scoring rates alongside averages for a holistic view. The employs career batting averages as a core criterion for induction, requiring inductees to have amassed at least 8,000 runs with 20 centuries in Tests or ODIs, or maintained an average exceeding 50, to honor sustained excellence beyond current rankings. Criticisms of ICC batting rankings center on their emphasis on recency via time-decay, which can undervalue players with exceptional longevity and high career averages, potentially overlooking contributions from less active veterans. Additionally, the system's reliance on recent opposition quality has faced scrutiny for inconsistencies, such as technical glitches affecting rankings or biases toward frequent-matchplaying nations, though updates aim to refine these issues.

References

  1. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/get-inspired/61872353
  2. https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/the-new-improved-batting-average-610837
  3. https://www.espncricinfo.com/records/highest-career-batting-average-282910
  4. https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/kartikeya-date-the-calculus-of-the-batting-average-745791
  5. https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/the-weighted-batting-average-wba-in-tests-updated-1272303
  6. https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/inbox-how-to-account-for-not-outs-more-accurately-when-assessing-batsmen-1147000
  7. https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/the-vexed-question-of-not-outs-in-test-cricket-623459
  8. https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/measuring-batting-averages-effectively-618395
  9. https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/why-the-last-five-years-have-been-tougher-for-test-batters-than-the-rest-of-this-century-1266454
  10. https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/difference-between-home-and-away-batting-averages-255948
  11. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17479541251321477
  12. https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/a-statistical-look-at-how-cricket-has-changed-over-the-past-30-years-more-runs-longer-careers-fewer-breaks-1367458
  13. https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/2024-men-s-t20-world-cup-how-t20-has-changed-cricket-forever-1430929
  14. https://www.espncricinfo.com/records/highest-career-batting-average-282911
  15. https://www.espncricinfo.com/records/highest-career-batting-average-282912
  16. https://redballdata.blog/2018/12/31/test-vs-county-cricket-averages/
  17. https://www.cricketmatters.com/good-batting-average/
  18. https://www.espncricinfo.com/records/highest-career-batting-average-284197
  19. https://www.cricketweb.net/part-1-not-out-innings-and-batting-averages-demystifying-rarefied-solutions-a-searchlight-on-the-straightforward/
  20. https://www.espncricinfo.com/records/highest-career-batting-average-284199
  21. https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/wtc-stats-the-changing-game-bowlers-rise-batters-fall-tests-get-faster-and-shorter-1489338
  22. https://glamorgancricketarchives.com/javed-miandad/
  23. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/sarfaraz-khan-642525
  24. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/joe-root-303669
  25. https://www.wisden.com/series/quaid-e-azam-trophy-2025-26/cricket-news/highest-first-class-batting-averages-pakistan-youngster-azan-awais-sets-national-record-with-hundred-in-third-consecutive-game
  26. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/steven-smith-267192
  27. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/virat-kohli-253802
  28. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/babar-azam-348144
  29. https://www.thecricketpanda.com/best-average-in-odi/
  30. https://www.howstat.com/Cricket/Statistics/Batting/BattingAverages_ODI.asp?Stat=1
  31. https://www.cricket.com/news/the-evolution-of-batting-in-odi-cricket-1596510901876
  32. https://www.icc-cricket.com/tournaments/cricketworldcup/stats
  33. https://www.hindustantimes.com/cricket/rohit-sharma-not-retiring-declares-he-will-play-2027-odi-world-cup-i-want-to-play-i-will-101760712641749.html
  34. https://www.howstat.com/Cricket/Statistics/Batting/BattingAverages_T20.asp
  35. https://www.cricbites.com/highest-batting-average-in-t20i-cricket-history/
  36. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/ipl/top-stories/analytical-study-shows-the-ipl-has-the-highest-standard-of-t20-cricket-in-the-world/articleshow/78250813.cms
  37. https://mysterycricket.com/blogs/the-mystery-cricket-blog/how-has-the-ipl-influenced-t20-cricket-worldwide
  38. https://www.icc-cricket.com/tournaments/t20cricketworldcup/stats
  39. https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/icc-men-s-t20-world-cup-2024-1411166/stats
  40. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/chris-gayle-51880/bowling-batting-stats
  41. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/nov/04/chris-gayle-cricket-sixes-history-t20
  42. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/dec/17/womens-odi-team-of-decade-edwards-van-niekerk
  43. https://www.indiatoday.in/sports/cricket/story/bcci-womens-test-matches-multi-day-domestic-games-devajit-saikia-2811660-2025-10-31
  44. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/enid-bakewell-53731
  45. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/charlotte-edwards-53696
  46. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/denise-annetts-53477
  47. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/shafali-verma-1182523
  48. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/lorraine-hill-53507
  49. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/belinda-haggett-53505
  50. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/ellyse-perry-275487
  51. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/smriti-mandhana-597806
  52. https://www.espncricinfo.com/records/highest-career-batting-average-284195
  53. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/mithali-raj-54273
  54. https://www.relianceiccrankings.com/playerdisplay/womenodi/batting/10858-mithali-raj/
  55. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/nat-sciver-brunt-515905
  56. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/icc-womens-world-cup-2025/2017-world-cup-was-like-a-green-revolution-for-womens-cricket-in-india-ex-womens-team-head-coach-exclusive/articleshow/125100285.cms
  57. https://emergencycricketblog.wordpress.com/2025/09/29/womens-odis-scale-new-heights-ahead-of-the-2025-world-cup/
  58. https://cricket.one/cricket-analysis/the-bcci-masterstroke-introduced-in-2023-analysing-the-impact-of-wpl-in-indian-cricket/6908ae5839a217ec3c756e86
  59. https://www.cnbctv18.com/sports/india-womens-cricket-world-cup-2025-victory-mithali-raj-wpl-impact-19740181.htm
  60. https://www.espn.com/cricket/story/_/id/46842963/women-world-cup-2025-power-hitters-left-arm-spinners-flourish-catching-sloppy
  61. https://advancecricket.com/player-stats/ellyse-perry-against-new-zealand-women-odi-stats-on-new-zealand-women-tour-of-aust-2019/12579293
  62. https://www.espncricinfo.com/records/year/batting-highest-career-batting-average/2025-2025/women-s-one-day-internationals-9
  63. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/stafanie-taylor-355359/tests-odi-t20-records
  64. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/ellyse-perry-275487/tests-odi-t20-records
  65. https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/danni-wyatt-hodge-254168/tests-odi-t20-records
  66. https://www.thecricketmonthly.com/story/1163257/the-year-batting-in-women-s-t20s-went-boom
  67. https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/icc-women-s-t20-world-cup-2024-25-1432420/stats
  68. https://www.espncricinfo.com/records/trophy/batting-highest-career-batting-average/icc-women-s-t20-world-cup-136
  69. https://crickinsights.com/what-is-strike-rate-in-cricket-and-its-formula/
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3761498/
  71. https://www.aljazeera.com/sports/2019/6/3/10-ways-odi-cricket-has-changed-in-last-two-decades
  72. https://www.quora.com/What-is-a-good-batting-strike-rate-in-all-formats-of-cricket
  73. https://cricket.one/cricket-analysis/impact-player-rule-how-it-has-transformed-ipl/68088ff09724cd66d538a912
  74. https://arxiv.org/html/2406.11652v1
  75. https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/a-history-of-the-icc-rankings
  76. https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/how-icc-assigns-ranking-to-players-1547127710-1
  77. https://www.icc-cricket.com/rankings/batting/mens/test
  78. https://www.icc-cricket.com/rankings/batting/mens/odi
  79. https://www.icc-cricket.com/rankings/batting/mens/t20i
  80. https://www.icc-cricket.com/rankings/batting/womens/odi
  81. https://www.espn.com/cricket/story/_/id/46843255/women-world-cup-laura-wolvaardt-passes-smriti-mandhana-top-spot-icc-odi-rankings
  82. https://www.icc-cricket.com/rankings/batting/womens/t20i
  83. https://www.espncricinfo.com/rankings/icc-player-ranking
  84. https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/explainer-how-smart-stats-works-1178326
  85. https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/icc-forced-to-backtrack-on-all-time-player-rankings-386600
  86. https://phys.org/news/2018-10-limitations-batsmen-revealed.html
  87. https://www.wisden.com/cricket-news/icc-update-player-rankings-technical-issues-rohit-kohli-left-out-odi-rankings
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.