Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Bottom quark
View on Wikipedia
| Composition | elementary particle |
|---|---|
| Statistics | fermionic |
| Family | quark |
| Generation | third |
| Interactions | strong, weak, electromagnetic, gravity |
| Symbol | b |
| Antiparticle | bottom antiquark (b) |
| Theorized | Makoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa (1973)[1] |
| Discovered | Leon M. Lederman et al. (1977)[2] |
| Mass | 4.18+0.04 −0.03 GeV/c2 (MS scheme)[3] 4.65+0.03 −0.03 GeV/c2 (1S scheme)[4] |
| Decays into | charm quark or up quark |
| Electric charge | −1/3 e |
| Color charge | yes |
| Spin | 1/2 ħ |
| Weak isospin | LH: −+1/2, RH: 0 |
| Weak hypercharge | LH: 1/3, RH: −+2/3 |
The bottom quark, beauty quark, or b quark, is an elementary particle of the third generation. It is a heavy quark with a charge of −1/3 e.
All quarks are described in a similar way by electroweak interaction and quantum chromodynamics, but the bottom quark has exceptionally low rates of transition to lower-mass quarks. The bottom quark is also notable because it is a product in almost all top quark decays, and is a frequent decay product of the Higgs boson.
Name and history
[edit]The bottom quark was first described theoretically in 1973 by physicists Makoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa to explain CP violation.[1] The name "bottom" was introduced in 1975 by Haim Harari.[5][6]
The evidence for the bottom quark was first obtained in 1977 by the Fermilab E288 experiment team led by Leon M. Lederman, when proton-nucleon collisions produced bottomonium decaying to pairs of muons.[2][7][8] The discovery was confirmed about a year later by the PLUTO and DASP2 Collaborations at the electron-positron collider DORIS at DESY.[9][10] It was reported at the time that DESY scientists were in favor of the name "beauty", while the American scientists tended towards "bottom".[10]
Kobayashi and Maskawa won the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physics for their explanation of CP-violation.[11][12]
While the name "beauty" is sometimes used, "bottom" became the predominant usage by analogy of "top" and "bottom" to "up" and "down".[citation needed]
Distinct character
[edit]The bottom quark's "bare" mass is around 4.18 GeV/c2[3] – a bit more than four times the mass of a proton, and many orders of magnitude larger than common "light" quarks.
Although it almost exclusively transitions from or to a top quark, the bottom quark can decay into either an up quark or charm quark via the weak interaction. CKM matrix elements Vub and Vcb specify the rates, where both these decays are suppressed, making lifetimes of most bottom particles (~10−12 s) somewhat longer than those of charmed particles (~10−13 s), but shorter than those of strange particles (from ~10−10 to ~10−8 s).[13]
The combination of high mass and low transition rate gives experimental collision byproducts containing a bottom quark a distinctive signature that makes them relatively easy to identify using a technique called "B-tagging". For that reason, mesons containing the bottom quark are exceptionally long-lived for their mass, and are the easiest particles to use to investigate CP violation. Such experiments are being performed at the BaBar, Belle and LHCb experiments.
Hadrons containing bottom quarks
[edit]Some of the hadrons containing bottom quarks include:
- B mesons contain a bottom quark (or its antiparticle) and an up or down quark.
- B
c and B
s mesons contain a bottom quark along with a charm quark or strange quark respectively. - There are many bottomonium states, for example the ϒ meson and χb(3P), the first particle discovered in LHC. These consist of a bottom quark and its antiparticle.
- Bottom baryons have been observed, and are named in analogy with strange baryons (e.g. Λ0
b).
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b Kobayashi, M.; Maskawa, T. (1973). "CP-Violation in the Renormalizable Theory of Weak Interaction". Progress of Theoretical Physics. 49 (2): 652–657. Bibcode:1973PThPh..49..652K. doi:10.1143/PTP.49.652. hdl:2433/66179.
- ^ a b "Discoveries at Fermilab – Discovery of the Bottom Quark" (Press release). Fermilab. 7 August 1977. Retrieved 24 July 2009.
- ^ a b M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group) (2018). "Review of Particle Physics". Physical Review D. 98 (3) 030001. Bibcode:2018PhRvD..98c0001T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.030001. hdl:10044/1/68623.
- ^ J. Beringer (Particle Data Group); et al. (2012). "PDGLive Particle Summary 'Quarks (u, d, s, c, b, t, b′, t′, Free)'" (PDF). Particle Data Group. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 May 2013. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
- ^ Harari, H. (1975). "A new quark model for hadrons". Physics Letters B. 57 (3): 265–269. Bibcode:1975PhLB...57..265H. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90072-6.
- ^ Staley, K. W. (2004). The Evidence for the Top Quark. Cambridge University Press. pp. 31–33. ISBN 978-0-521-82710-2.
- ^ Lederman, L. M. (2005). "Logbook: Bottom Quark". Symmetry Magazine. 2 (8). Archived from the original on 4 October 2006.
- ^ Herb, S. W.; Hom, D.; Lederman, L.; Sens, J.; Snyder, H.; Yoh, J.; Appel, J.; Brown, B.; Brown, C.; Innes, W.; Ueno, K.; Yamanouchi, T.; Ito, A.; Jöstlein, H.; Kaplan, D.; Kephart, R.; et al. (1977). "Observation of a Dimuon Resonance at 9.5 GeV in 400-GeV Proton-Nucleus Collisions". Physical Review Letters. 39 (5): 252. Bibcode:1977PhRvL..39..252H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.252. OSTI 1155396.
- ^ G. Flügge (1978). "Particle Spectroscopy". Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on High Energy Physics (Tokyo): 793–810.
- ^ a b Arthur L. Robinson (1978). "Particle Physics: New Evidence from Germany for Fifth Quark". Science. 200 (4345): 1033–1034. Bibcode:1978Sci...200.1033R. doi:10.1126/science.200.4345.1033.
- ^ 2008 Physics Nobel Prize lecture by Makoto Kobayashi
- ^ 2008 Physics Nobel Prize lecture by Toshihide Maskawa
- ^ Nave, C.R. (ed.). "Transformation of Quark Flavors by the Weak Interaction". Department of Physics and Astronomy. HyperPhysics. Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.
Further reading
[edit]- L. Lederman (1978). "The Upsilon Particle". Scientific American. 239 (4): 72–81. Bibcode:1978SciAm.239d..72L. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1078-72.
- R. Nave. "Quarks". HyperPhysics. Georgia State University, Department of Physics and Astronomy. Retrieved 29 June 2008.
- A. Pickering (1984). Constructing Quarks. University of Chicago Press. pp. 114–125. ISBN 978-0-226-66799-7.
- J. Yoh (1997). The Discovery of the b Quark at Fermilab in 1977: The Experiment Coordinator's Story (PDF). Proceedings of Twenty Beautiful Years of Bottom Physics. AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 424. pp. 29–42. Bibcode:1998AIPC..424...29Y. doi:10.1063/1.55114.
- Stone, Sheldon (1994). B Decays (2nd ed.). Syracuse University: World Scientific. doi:10.1142/1441. ISBN 978-981-02-0708-3. OCLC 636743000.
External links
[edit]- History of the discovery of the bottom quark / Upsilon meson Archived 24 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine
Bottom quark
View on GrokipediaHistory and Discovery
Naming and Historical Context
The quark model, independently proposed by Murray Gell-Mann and George Zweig in 1964, provided a framework for classifying hadrons as composites of fundamental constituents called quarks, initially limited to three flavors: up, down, and strange.92001-3) This model successfully organized the spectrum of known particles but faced challenges in explaining certain aspects of weak interactions, such as flavor-changing neutral currents, which prompted the introduction of a fourth quark flavor, charm, in 1970 by Glashow, Iliopoulos, and Maiani to restore consistency via the Glashow-Iliopoulos-Maiani (GIM) mechanism. The experimental discovery of the charm quark in November 1974 through the J/ψ meson at SLAC and Brookhaven National Laboratory confirmed this prediction and highlighted the need for generational symmetry in the quark sector. To address the observed CP violation in neutral kaon decays, Makoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa proposed in 1973 that the Standard Model required three generations of quarks, extending the Cabibbo mixing matrix to a 3×3 unitary matrix (now known as the CKM matrix) and predicting the existence of a third-generation down-type quark alongside its up-type partner. This theoretical postulation preceded the charm discovery and anticipated a heavier quark pair to complete the generational structure, enabling a single complex phase in the CKM matrix to accommodate CP violation without introducing new fields. The bottom quark, as the down-type member of this third generation, was thus envisioned as essential for balancing the up-type top quark and maintaining the symmetry of weak isospin doublets across generations. The naming of the bottom quark emerged amid theoretical speculation in the mid-1970s, with Haim Harari introducing the terms "top" and "bottom" in 1975 to denote the third-generation quark pair, chosen for their oppositional pairing akin to up and down while preserving the initials "t" and "b" from earlier provisional labels.[4] Alternative names like "truth" for top and "beauty" for bottom gained some traction among theorists, including suggestions from Sheldon Glashow, due to their poetic resonance, but sparked debate over appropriateness—Leonard Susskind later noted the risqué connotations led to brief avoidance. Following the experimental evidence for the bottom quark in 1977, the Particle Data Group formalized "bottom" (and its symbol b) as the standard nomenclature in their late-1970s reviews, favoring it over "beauty" amid preferences from American versus European physicists, thus establishing it in the lexicon of particle physics.Experimental Discovery
The bottom quark was experimentally discovered in 1977 by the E288 collaboration at Fermilab, led by Leon Lederman, through the observation of the Υ(9.46) resonance—a bound state of a bottom quark and its antiquark—in high-energy proton-nucleus collisions. The experiment utilized a 400 GeV proton beam directed at a fixed platinum target, with a muon spectrometer detecting dimuon events from the decays.[5] Data collection occurred in May and June 1977, leading to the paper's submission on July 1 and publication in August, marking the first evidence of a third generation of quarks as predicted by the Standard Model. Key evidence for the new heavy quark came from the Υ meson's mass of approximately 9.46 GeV/c², significantly higher than that of the charmonium states like the J/ψ (around 3.1 GeV/c²), which distinguished it from lighter quark-antiquark pairs. The resonance appeared as a narrow peak in the dimuon invariant mass spectrum, with a statistical significance exceeding 10 standard deviations in a sample of about 9,000 events, and its production cross-section was consistent with expectations for a heavy quarkonium state.[6] Decay patterns, primarily into leptons with minimal hadronic contamination due to the high mass threshold, further supported the interpretation as a bottom-antibottom system rather than an exotic state.[5] Subsequent confirmations in 1978 validated the discovery through direct production of the Υ resonance. The PLUTO experiment at DESY's DORIS storage ring observed the Υ in e⁺e⁻ annihilations at a center-of-mass energy of 9.46 GeV, measuring its mass precisely at 9.46 ± 0.01 GeV/c² and confirming its narrow width of about 8 MeV, attributable to the resolution of the accelerator.90287-3) At CERN's Intersecting Storage Rings (ISR), high transverse momentum muon events were detected, consistent with semileptonic decays of free bottom quarks (b → cℓν), providing evidence for open beauty production beyond bound states.[5] These observations in 1978–1979, leveraging electron-positron and proton-proton collisions, corroborated the Fermilab results and established the bottom quark's existence via distinct leptonic signatures.[7] Further validation came in the early 1980s from the UA1 experiment at CERN's Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) proton-antiproton collider, which measured bottom quark production cross-sections using dimuon events from semileptonic decays in collisions at √s = 540 GeV.90848-3) Analyzing data from 1983 onward, UA1 reported a cross-section for b-quark pairs with transverse momentum above 5 GeV/c of approximately 20–50 nb, aligning with perturbative QCD predictions and solidifying the bottom quark's role in the Standard Model.90848-3)Fundamental Properties
Quantum Numbers and Charge
The bottom quark is classified as a down-type quark, sharing the electric charge of −1/3 e with the down and strange quarks.[1] It possesses a baryon number of +1/3, consistent with all quarks, and a lepton number of 0, as quarks do not participate in leptonic processes.[1] The defining flavor quantum number for the bottom quark is bottomness, denoted , which uniquely identifies it among the six quark flavors and is conserved in strong and electromagnetic interactions.[1] Under quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the theory of strong interactions, the bottom quark carries a color charge, transforming in the fundamental (triplet) representation of the SU(3) gauge group. This means it possesses one of three possible color charges—red, green, or blue—with antiquarks carrying the corresponding anticolors.[2] Color confinement ensures that quarks are never observed in isolation but form color-neutral hadrons. In the electroweak sector of the Standard Model, the chiral assignments differ for left- and right-handed components due to parity violation. The left-handed bottom quark belongs to an SU(2) doublet together with the left-handed top quark, with weak isospin and third component ; the doublet has weak hypercharge .[3] The right-handed bottom quark is an SU(2) singlet with and .[3] These assignments satisfy the relation , yielding the observed charge of −1/3. For approximate flavor symmetries in strong interactions, the bottom quark has isospin , as it does not form an isospin doublet with lighter quarks.[8]| Quantum Number | Value for Bottom Quark | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Electric Charge | −1/3 | In units of elementary charge .[1] |
| Baryon Number | +1/3 | Additive for quarks.[1] |
| Lepton Number | 0 | Quarks are not leptons.[1] |
| Bottomness | −1 | Flavor label; +1 for antiquark.[1] |
| Color Charge | Red, green, or blue | Under SU(3).[2] |
| Strong Isospin | 0 | No light-quark mixing.[8] |
| Weak Isospin (left-handed) | 1/2 | Part of (top, bottom) doublet.[3] |
| Weak (left-handed) | −1/2 | Third component.[3] |
| Weak Hypercharge (left-handed) | 1/3 | For the doublet.[3] |
| Weak Hypercharge (right-handed) | −2/3 | Singlet.[3] |
