Hubbry Logo
Bottom quarkBottom quarkMain
Open search
Bottom quark
Community hub
Bottom quark
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Bottom quark
Bottom quark
from Wikipedia

Bottom quark
Compositionelementary particle
Statisticsfermionic
Familyquark
Generationthird
Interactionsstrong, weak, electromagnetic, gravity
Symbolb
Antiparticlebottom antiquark (b)
TheorizedMakoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa (1973)[1]
DiscoveredLeon M. Lederman et al. (1977)[2]
Mass4.18+0.04
−0.03
 GeV/c2
(MS scheme)[3]
4.65+0.03
−0.03
 GeV/c2
(1S scheme)[4]
Decays intocharm quark or
up quark
Electric charge1/3 e
Color chargeyes
Spin1/2 ħ
Weak isospinLH: ⁠−+1/2, RH: 0
Weak hyperchargeLH: 1/3, RH: ⁠−+2/3

The bottom quark, beauty quark, or b quark, is an elementary particle of the third generation. It is a heavy quark with a charge of −1/3 e.

All quarks are described in a similar way by electroweak interaction and quantum chromodynamics, but the bottom quark has exceptionally low rates of transition to lower-mass quarks. The bottom quark is also notable because it is a product in almost all top quark decays, and is a frequent decay product of the Higgs boson.

Name and history

[edit]

The bottom quark was first described theoretically in 1973 by physicists Makoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa to explain CP violation.[1] The name "bottom" was introduced in 1975 by Haim Harari.[5][6]

The evidence for the bottom quark was first obtained in 1977 by the Fermilab E288 experiment team led by Leon M. Lederman, when proton-nucleon collisions produced bottomonium decaying to pairs of muons.[2][7][8] The discovery was confirmed about a year later by the PLUTO and DASP2 Collaborations at the electron-positron collider DORIS at DESY.[9][10] It was reported at the time that DESY scientists were in favor of the name "beauty", while the American scientists tended towards "bottom".[10]

Kobayashi and Maskawa won the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physics for their explanation of CP-violation.[11][12]

While the name "beauty" is sometimes used, "bottom" became the predominant usage by analogy of "top" and "bottom" to "up" and "down".[citation needed]

Distinct character

[edit]

The bottom quark's "bare" mass is around 4.18 GeV/c2[3] – a bit more than four times the mass of a proton, and many orders of magnitude larger than common "light" quarks.

Although it almost exclusively transitions from or to a top quark, the bottom quark can decay into either an up quark or charm quark via the weak interaction. CKM matrix elements Vub and Vcb specify the rates, where both these decays are suppressed, making lifetimes of most bottom particles (~10−12 s) somewhat longer than those of charmed particles (~10−13 s), but shorter than those of strange particles (from ~10−10 to ~10−8 s).[13]

The combination of high mass and low transition rate gives experimental collision byproducts containing a bottom quark a distinctive signature that makes them relatively easy to identify using a technique called "B-tagging". For that reason, mesons containing the bottom quark are exceptionally long-lived for their mass, and are the easiest particles to use to investigate CP violation. Such experiments are being performed at the BaBar, Belle and LHCb experiments.

Hadrons containing bottom quarks

[edit]

Some of the hadrons containing bottom quarks include:

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The bottom quark, also known as the b quark or beauty quark, is an elementary and one of the six fundamental in the of , serving as the down-type quark of the third generation. It has a spin of 1/2, an of −1/3 e, and a measured of 4.183 ± 0.007 GeV/c² in the modified minimal subtraction (MS) scheme at the renormalization scale μ = mb. As a heavy quark, it participates in all fundamental interactions—strong, weak, electromagnetic, and gravitational—but is confined within hadrons due to in (QCD), never observed in isolation. The bottom quark was discovered in 1977 at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) through the observation of the , a of a bottom quark and its antiquark, produced in proton-nucleus collisions and detected via dimuon decays. This finding, reported by the E288 collaboration led by Leon Lederman, confirmed the existence of a third generation of quarks, completing the quark-lepton symmetry predicted by the and paving the way for the subsequent discovery of the top quark in 1995. The bottom quark's large mass distinguishes it from lighter quarks, enabling precise studies of flavor-changing processes and weak decays, with its hadronic lifetime inferred from measurements to be on the order of 1.5 picoseconds. In the , the bottom quark forms a doublet with the top quark, undergoing flavor-changing neutral currents suppressed by the Glashow-Iliopoulos-Maiani mechanism and contributing significantly to through the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix. Bottom-flavored hadrons, such as B mesons and Λb baryons, are produced copiously at high-energy colliders like the (LHC), where they enable tests of the unitarity triangle, searches for new , and measurements of the Higgs boson's couplings to heavy quarks. Its properties, including a bottom quantum number of −1 for the quark and +1 for the antiquark, underpin the spectroscopy of bottomonium states and inform calculations of quark masses and mixing angles.

History and Discovery

Naming and Historical Context

The quark model, independently proposed by Murray Gell-Mann and George Zweig in 1964, provided a framework for classifying hadrons as composites of fundamental constituents called quarks, initially limited to three flavors: up, down, and strange.92001-3) This model successfully organized the spectrum of known particles but faced challenges in explaining certain aspects of weak interactions, such as flavor-changing neutral currents, which prompted the introduction of a fourth quark flavor, charm, in 1970 by Glashow, Iliopoulos, and Maiani to restore consistency via the Glashow-Iliopoulos-Maiani (GIM) mechanism. The experimental discovery of the charm quark in November 1974 through the J/ψ meson at SLAC and Brookhaven National Laboratory confirmed this prediction and highlighted the need for generational symmetry in the quark sector. To address the observed CP violation in neutral kaon decays, and proposed in 1973 that the required three generations of s, extending the Cabibbo mixing matrix to a 3×3 (now known as the CKM matrix) and predicting the existence of a third-generation down-type alongside its up-type partner. This theoretical postulation preceded the charm discovery and anticipated a heavier pair to complete the generational structure, enabling a single complex phase in the CKM matrix to accommodate without introducing new fields. The bottom , as the down-type member of this third generation, was thus envisioned as essential for balancing the up-type and maintaining the symmetry of doublets across generations. The naming of the bottom quark emerged amid theoretical speculation in the mid-1970s, with Haim Harari introducing the terms "top" and "bottom" in 1975 to denote the third-generation quark pair, chosen for their oppositional pairing akin to up and down while preserving the initials "t" and "b" from earlier provisional labels. Alternative names like "truth" for top and "beauty" for bottom gained some traction among theorists, including suggestions from Sheldon Glashow, due to their poetic resonance, but sparked debate over appropriateness—Leonard Susskind later noted the risqué connotations led to brief avoidance. Following the experimental evidence for the bottom quark in 1977, the Particle Data Group formalized "bottom" (and its symbol b) as the standard nomenclature in their late-1970s reviews, favoring it over "beauty" amid preferences from American versus European physicists, thus establishing it in the lexicon of particle physics.

Experimental Discovery

The bottom quark was experimentally discovered in 1977 by the E288 collaboration at , led by Leon Lederman, through the observation of the Υ(9.46) resonance—a of a bottom quark and its antiquark—in high-energy proton-nucleus collisions. The experiment utilized a 400 GeV proton beam directed at a fixed platinum target, with a muon spectrometer detecting dimuon events from the decays. Data collection occurred in May and June 1977, leading to the paper's submission on July 1 and publication in August, marking the first evidence of a third generation of quarks as predicted by the . Key evidence for the new heavy quark came from the Υ meson's mass of approximately 9.46 GeV/c², significantly higher than that of the charmonium states like the J/ψ (around 3.1 GeV/c²), which distinguished it from lighter quark-antiquark pairs. The resonance appeared as a narrow peak in the dimuon spectrum, with a statistical significance exceeding 10 standard deviations in a sample of about 9,000 events, and its production cross-section was consistent with expectations for a heavy state. Decay patterns, primarily into leptons with minimal hadronic contamination due to the high threshold, further supported the interpretation as a bottom-antibottom system rather than an exotic state. Subsequent confirmations in 1978 validated the discovery through direct production of the Υ resonance. The experiment at DESY's DORIS storage ring observed the Υ in e⁺e⁻ annihilations at a center-of-mass energy of 9.46 GeV, measuring its precisely at 9.46 ± 0.01 GeV/c² and confirming its narrow width of about 8 MeV, attributable to the resolution of the accelerator.90287-3) At CERN's Intersecting (ISR), high transverse momentum muon events were detected, consistent with semileptonic decays of free bottom quarks (b → cℓν), providing for open production beyond bound states. These observations in 1978–1979, leveraging electron-positron and proton-proton collisions, corroborated the results and established the bottom quark's existence via distinct leptonic signatures. Further validation came in the early 1980s from the UA1 experiment at CERN's (SPS) proton-antiproton collider, which measured bottom quark production cross-sections using dimuon events from semileptonic decays in collisions at √s = 540 GeV.90848-3) Analyzing data from 1983 onward, UA1 reported a cross-section for b-quark pairs with transverse above 5 GeV/c of approximately 20–50 nb, aligning with perturbative QCD predictions and solidifying the bottom quark's role in the Standard Model.90848-3)

Fundamental Properties

Quantum Numbers and Charge

The bottom quark is classified as a down-type quark, sharing the electric charge of −1/3 e with the down and strange quarks. It possesses a of +1/3, consistent with all quarks, and a of 0, as quarks do not participate in leptonic processes. The defining flavor quantum number for the bottom quark is bottomness, denoted b=1b = -1, which uniquely identifies it among the six flavors and is conserved in strong and electromagnetic interactions. Under (QCD), the theory of strong interactions, the carries a , transforming in the fundamental (triplet) representation of the SU(3)c_c gauge group. This means it possesses one of three possible color charges—red, green, or blue—with antiquarks carrying the corresponding anticolors. ensures that quarks are never observed in isolation but form color-neutral hadrons. In the electroweak sector of the , the chiral assignments differ for left- and right-handed components due to parity violation. The left-handed bottom quark belongs to an SU(2)L_L doublet together with the left-handed , with I=1/2I = 1/2 and third component I3=1/2I_3 = -1/2; the doublet has Y=1/3Y = 1/3. The right-handed bottom quark is an SU(2)L_L singlet with I=0I = 0 and Y=2/3Y = -2/3. These assignments satisfy the relation Q=I3+Y/2Q = I_3 + Y/2, yielding the observed charge of −1/3. For approximate flavor symmetries in strong interactions, the bottom quark has I=0I = 0, as it does not form an doublet with lighter quarks.
Quantum NumberValue for Bottom QuarkNotes
QQ−1/3 eeIn units of ee.
BB+1/3Additive for quarks.
LL0Quarks are not leptons.
Bottomness bb−1Flavor label; +1 for antiquark.
Red, green, or blueUnder SU(3)c_c.
Strong II0No light-quark mixing.
Weak (left-handed) II1/2Part of (top, bottom)L_L doublet.
Weak I3I_3 (left-handed)−1/2Third component.
Weak Hypercharge YY (left-handed)1/3For the doublet.
Weak Hypercharge YY (right-handed)−2/3Singlet.

Mass, Spin, and Lifetime

The bottom quark possesses a pole of 4.78 ± 0.06 GeV/c², as evaluated by the 2024 Particle Data Group (PDG). This value is derived primarily from analyses of B hadron spectra observed in experiments at the LEP collider and the , where the bottom quark's contribution to the bound-state masses is extracted using non-relativistic QCD frameworks. Complementarily, lattice QCD simulations yield the running in the MS\overline{\rm MS} scheme, mb(mb)=4.183±0.007m_b(m_b) = 4.183 \pm 0.007 GeV, incorporating effects and achieving precision through ensembles with Nf=2+1+1N_f = 2+1+1 dynamical quarks. As a fundamental in the , the bottom quark has an intrinsic spin of 12\frac{1}{2} \hbar, described by a that governs its interactions under the . This spin-12\frac{1}{2} nature aligns with the chiral structure of weak interactions and contributes to the helicity suppression in certain decay processes, though direct observation is mediated through hadronic states. The mean lifetime of the bottom quark is approximately 1.5×10121.5 \times 10^{-12} s, inferred from the measured lifetimes of B mesons such as the B0B^0 (1.517 ±\pm 0.004 ps) and B+B^+ (1.638 ±\pm 0.004 ps), as reported by the PDG using data from LHCb, Belle II, and other experiments. Due to in , the free bottom quark cannot be isolated or directly observed, so its lifetime is theoretically estimated from spectator models and perturbative QCD, adjusted for bound-state effects in B hadrons. These properties are consistent with Standard Model predictions, where the bottom quark mass arises from the via the Yukawa coupling ybmb/(v/2)y_b \approx m_b / (v / \sqrt{2})
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.