Hubbry Logo
Branch officeBranch officeMain
Open search
Branch office
Community hub
Branch office
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Branch office
Branch office
Branch office
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
The Johor branch office of Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers.

A branch office is an outlet of a company or, more generally, an organization that – unlike a subsidiary – does not constitute a separate legal entity, while being physically separated from the organization's main office.[1] Branching is particularly widespread in banking and other financial institutions, where the products' complexity requires local offices to act more like an agency than as a separate company. A branch structure exposes the owning company to full taxability and legal liability in regard to the branch office's operations.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Branch office

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A branch office is an extension of a company's operations at a physically separate from its principal , where it conducts activities such as , , or administrative functions, but without forming a distinct legal . Unlike a , which operates as an independent with its own legal personality and for the , a branch office shares the 's full legal identity, meaning the company assumes all liabilities, taxes, and regulatory obligations arising from the branch's activities. This structure allows es to expand geographically—often to access new markets, serve local clients more effectively, or manage regional operations—while maintaining centralized control and cost efficiencies compared to establishing a separate . Branch offices vary in scale and purpose, ranging from small outposts with a single representative to larger facilities handling specialized divisions like or , typically overseen by a branch manager who reports to . In sectors such as and , regulatory definitions may impose additional requirements, such as registration and supervision; for instance, under U.S. securities law, a branch office includes any site where associated persons regularly effect transactions in securities. Benefits include enhanced customer proximity and adaptability to local needs, as seen in firms like Edward Jones, which operates thousands of branches for personalized financial advising. However, challenges arise from the parent's unlimited exposure to risks, including lawsuits or compliance issues at the branch, prompting many international firms to prefer subsidiaries for liability protection despite higher setup costs.

Overview

Definition

A branch office is a secondary , distinct from the main , where a conducts operations as an extension of the parent company, without establishing a . This structure allows the parent company to maintain full operational oversight while expanding its reach geographically. The term "branch office" traces its etymology to the early 19th century, evolving from the word "branch," which by 1817 denoted a local office of a business as a component part of a larger system, particularly in the context of commercial expansion by banking and trading houses. This usage reflected the era's growth in international trade and finance, where firms extended their operations through localized outposts without independent incorporation. Key elements of a branch office include direct control exerted by the head office over daily activities, consistent use of the parent company's branding across locations, and centralized decision-making authority that aligns all branches with the overall corporate strategy. These features ensure operational uniformity while enabling localized service delivery.
AspectBranch OfficeSubsidiaryDivision
Legal StatusExtension of parent; no separate entitySeparate legal entityInternal unit of parent; no separate entity
Ownership100% owned and controlled by parentMajority or full ownership by parentFully integrated into parent
Physical PresenceDedicated location for operationsIndependent operations, often with own siteTypically non-physical (e.g., departmental)
LiabilityParent fully liable for branch actionsLimited to subsidiary's assetsParent liable for divisional activities

Key Characteristics

Branch offices exhibit a spectrum of , ranging from fully supervised outposts that operate under direct oversight from the parent company to semi-autonomous units empowered to handle local , such as negotiations and interactions, while still adhering to centralized policies. This balance allows branches to adapt to regional markets without fully replicating the parent company's strategic functions, though excessive independence can lead to inconsistencies in branding or operations. In terms of physical and virtual aspects, traditional branch offices maintain a dedicated separate from the , often in different cities or countries to facilitate localized activities like client meetings or product distribution. Modern iterations increasingly incorporate virtual branches, leveraging remote teams, digital communication tools, and cloud-based infrastructure to extend operations without a fixed physical site, particularly in sectors like where can be delivered online. Integration with the parent company is a core feature, involving shared resources such as centralized IT systems for , uniform HR policies for employee training, and coordinated supply chains to ensure efficiency across locations. This interconnected structure enables seamless reporting and resource allocation, with branches contributing to the overall corporate strategy while benefiting from . Branch offices are typically smaller in size and scale compared to head offices, concentrating on localized functions like , regional , or targeted rather than encompassing the full spectrum of corporate operations. This compact footprint reduces overhead costs and allows for agile responses to local demands, though it limits the breadth of activities to those directly supporting the entity's goals. Regarding , branches are extensions of the company, exposing the latter to risks arising from branch activities.

Registration and Establishment

The establishment of a branch office begins with securing internal approval from the parent company's , usually via a board resolution that authorizes the branch's creation, specifies its scope of activities, and designates a manager or representative. This step ensures alignment with the parent entity's strategic objectives and complies with standards. Following authorization, the parent company selects a suitable location for the branch, considering factors such as market proximity, logistical infrastructure, and regulatory environment to optimize operational efficiency. Once the location is chosen, the registration process involves submitting an application to the relevant local regulatory authority, such as a commercial registry or ministry of trade, to obtain official recognition of the branch. This filing formalizes the branch as an extension of the foreign parent without creating a . Required documentation typically includes certified copies of the parent company's articles of incorporation or , the authorizing board resolution, a granting authority to the branch manager, proof of the parent's (e.g., a certificate of incumbency), and evidence of adequate capital allocation or financial capacity to support operations. In some cases, a agreement for the branch or a description of intended activities is also submitted to demonstrate legitimacy. The overall timeline for registration and establishment generally spans 1 to 3 months, influenced by the jurisdiction's administrative efficiency, the volume of applications processed, and the accuracy of submitted materials; delays can occur if additional clarifications or translations are needed. Associated costs for basic registration fees, notarizations, and minor administrative expenses commonly range from $500 to $5,000, though these exclude professional fees for legal or consulting services and vary based on local requirements. After approval, post-registration obligations include filing an initial activity report with the regulatory body, registering for local taxes and social security if applicable, and commencing periodic updates on the branch's operations to maintain compliance.

Liability and Governance

Unlike subsidiaries, which operate as separate legal entities, branch offices lack independent legal personality, exposing the parent company to unlimited liability for all debts, obligations, and legal claims stemming from the branch's activities. This means that creditors or litigants can pursue the parent company's global assets to satisfy judgments against the branch, without the protective afforded by incorporation. Such full exposure heightens financial risks, particularly in jurisdictions with stringent regulatory environments, where branch operations could trigger cascading liabilities across the multinational structure. Governance of branch offices is centralized under the parent company's , typically implemented through appointed local managers who exercise day-to-day control while reporting directly to for strategic decisions. Oversight mechanisms often include board resolutions that dictate operational boundaries, implementation, and protocols, ensuring the branch aligns with the 's overall corporate objectives without autonomous power. This direct chain of command facilitates rapid response to issues but requires robust internal controls to mitigate the risks of decentralized execution. Branch offices must adhere strictly to host country regulations, including labor standards, environmental protections, and statutes, while integrating the parent company's global compliance framework to avoid conflicts. For instance, multinational firms often deploy standardized policies on ethical conduct and reporting, adapted to local nuances through and audits, to ensure uniform accountability across operations. Failure to balance these requirements can result in penalties that extend to the parent, underscoring the need for proactive monitoring. A prominent illustration of these liability dynamics occurred in 2014, when , a French multinational , pleaded guilty to U.S. charges for processing over $8.8 billion in transactions through its branches in , , and that violated sanctions against , , and ; the parent company was fined nearly $9 billion, highlighting how branch-level actions can directly imperil the entire organization. This case emphasized the critical role of in preventing such exposures, prompting enhanced compliance oversight in the banking sector.

Operational Structure

Management and Staffing

In a branch office, the organizational centers on the branch manager as the primary role, who reports directly to executives at the parent company's to ensure strategic alignment. This manager oversees subordinate local teams handling operational functions such as sales, , and , allowing for efficient execution of directives while adapting to regional needs. Such a structure promotes and coordination in multinational operations. Staffing strategies for branch offices typically balance the of local talent, valued for their cultural and regulatory familiarity, against the deployment of expatriates to enforce corporate standards and facilitate . Polycentric approaches favor locals to enhance market responsiveness and reduce costs, while ethnocentric models rely on expatriates for greater control, though the latter can increase expenses by two to three times due to relocation and support needs. Comprehensive training programs, including cultural immersion for expatriates and policy orientation for locals, are implemented to build cohesive teams and mitigate integration challenges. Performance metrics for branch offices emphasize key performance indicators (KPIs) like targets, ratings, and employee rates, which are calibrated to support the organization's broader objectives. For example, branch managers often aim to achieve 10% growth in new accounts or loans while maintaining high retention levels, providing measurable benchmarks for evaluating local contributions to global success. These aligned KPIs foster accountability without overriding legal oversight on staffing. Effective communication protocols in branch offices rely on regular reporting cycles and integrated tools like (ERP) systems to synchronize activities with the . ERP platforms enable real-time data exchange, standardized updates on operations, and collaborative issue resolution, ensuring seamless coordination across locations and minimizing discrepancies in multinational settings.

Financial and Administrative Operations

In branch offices of multinational corporations, budgeting and are primarily managed through allocations from the parent company, which provides the necessary capital for operations while local managers track expenses to align with regional market conditions and strategic goals. These allocations often involve cash budgeting combined with capital planning to evaluate long-term investments, with remittances of cash flows—such as profits or fees—directed back to the parent after adjustments for local factors like currency fluctuations and supplier costs. Unlike subsidiaries, branch offices do not operate as independent profit centers; instead, their financial activities are integrated into the parent's overall structure, ensuring centralized control over decisions without local in profit retention. Accounting practices for branch offices emphasize consolidation into the parent company's , where branch revenues and expenses are aggregated to present a unified view of the entity's performance. Head office expenses, such as administrative costs, rent, and IT support, are allocated to branches using methods like sales proportions, asset values, or employee counts to reflect usage accurately, with journal entries debiting the branch account and crediting the head office . During consolidation, inter-branch transactions and internal balances are eliminated to avoid double-counting, and any currency conversions for foreign branches are adjusted using appropriate exchange rates to maintain consistency. This process ensures that branch operations feed directly into the parent's , , and reports without recognizing the branch as a . Administrative support in branch offices involves handling local procurement of goods and services, setting up IT infrastructure tailored to regional needs, and maintaining detailed record-keeping to support operational efficiency. Accounting standards for branch records vary by jurisdiction; for example, branches in many international contexts follow International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), while those in the United States typically adhere to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). These standards may require preparation of financial statements—including balance sheets, income statements, and cash flow reports—in a functional currency that reflects the primary economic environment, while allowing a presentation currency if justified. This includes synthetic management reporting for assets and operations, with all documentation stored securely to facilitate audits and ensure a true and fair view of the branch's activities within the parent's framework. Audit processes for branch offices are typically conducted internally by the parent company's function, with a strong emphasis on to verify that intercompany transactions adhere to arm's length principles and mitigate potential disputes. These audits follow a structured life cycle, including planning, monitoring, documentation, and defense, often using a risk-based approach to focus on high-risk areas like cross-border goods or services transfers. Internal teams standardize processes across branches while allowing local adaptations, employing data analytics to detect anomalies and ensure compliance with global policies, thereby supporting the geocentric model of centralized oversight with regional flexibility. reviews specifically examine functional analyses, comparable pricing methods (e.g., comparable uncontrolled price or transactional net margin), and documentation like master files to confirm economic substance in branch-parent interactions.

Advantages and Challenges

Benefits of Branch Offices

Branch offices enable businesses to achieve deeper by establishing a local presence—such as sales offices or service centers—without the need to create a fully independent legal entity, which lowers entry barriers and simplifies access to regional customers and suppliers. For example, companies in sectors like medical supplies have used branches to connect directly with local practitioners, bypassing the delays and regulatory hurdles associated with subsidiary formation. From a cost perspective, branch offices offer significant efficiency advantages over standalone entities, as they require no initial capital investment for separate incorporation and allow shared resources, including centralized administration, , and technology infrastructure, which reduces operational duplication and overhead. This streamlined approach not only cuts setup expenses but also simplifies tax compliance, since branches file under the parent company's returns rather than maintaining distinct financial reporting. Maintaining consistency is another key benefit, as branch offices operate fully under the parent company's , ensuring uniform standards in operations, , and across geographies, which builds trust and leverages the established corporate . This unified identity helps avoid the fragmentation that can occur with more autonomous structures, fostering a seamless global image. Branch offices also support , particularly for rapid international rollout, by enabling quick replication of proven models without repeated legal setups. Retail chains like Apple have exemplified this; Apple, for instance, expanded to 535 company-operated retail stores worldwide as of September 2025 through direct branch structures in key markets, integrating local adaptations under centralized control.

Potential Drawbacks and Risks

Branch offices often face challenges stemming from their structural dependency on the parent company, which can hinder agile operations in dynamic local markets. Centralized control requires branches to seek approval from the head office for key decisions, resulting in slower response times to emerging opportunities or threats. This dependency limits the branch's ability to adapt strategies swiftly to local conditions, potentially causing missed business prospects such as rapid market entries or customized client engagements. The full legal and financial liability borne by the parent company for activities amplifies risks, as any failures, debts, or legal issues at the directly impact the entire . For instance, local operational missteps or scandals can lead to that extends beyond the , eroding global trust and inviting scrutiny from stakeholders. This unlimited liability, unlike the limited exposure in subsidiaries, heightens the overall vulnerability of the parent entity to localized failures. Cultural mismatches and logistical hurdles further complicate branch office effectiveness, particularly in diverse international settings. Differences in practices, communication styles, and norms can lead to misunderstandings or inefficiencies in team dynamics and negotiations, straining relationships with local partners or employees. Additionally, branches in remote or underdeveloped areas are susceptible to disruptions, such as transportation delays or resource shortages, which can interrupt operations and increase costs. These issues exacerbate the risks outlined in the liability and . To mitigate these drawbacks, multinational companies have increasingly adopted hybrid organizational models since , blending centralized oversight with greater local to address and operational risks. These models, often structured as hub-and-spoke systems, enable branches to handle day-to-day decisions independently while maintaining strategic alignment with the , reducing decision delays and enhancing resilience against disruptions like those from the .

Global Variations

Branch Offices in Common Law Jurisdictions

In jurisdictions such as the , the , and , branch offices of foreign companies are regulated through a combination of federal or national oversight and state or provincial requirements, with legal interpretations often guided by judicial precedents rather than rigid statutory codes. These systems typically treat branches as extensions of the rather than separate legal persons, which influences registration, taxation, and liability frameworks. This approach facilitates operations while ensuring compliance with local laws on commerce and taxation. In the United States, foreign companies establishing a branch must register as a foreign entity with the Secretary of State in each state where they conduct business, submitting an application for authority to transact business along with a certificate of good standing from the home jurisdiction. This state-level registration is required under varying state business organizations codes to qualify the entity to operate legally. For federal tax purposes, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) treats the U.S. branch of a foreign corporation as part of the parent entity, requiring the foreign corporation to file Form 1120-F to report any effectively connected income, gains, losses, deductions, and credits from U.S. trade or business activities. The branch itself is not a disregarded entity but is taxed through the parent's return, with potential branch profits tax applying to repatriated earnings unless reduced by treaty. The United Kingdom's framework under the mandates that overseas companies opening a establishment—such as a branch office—register with within one month of commencing business, using Form OS IN01 to provide details on the company's , directors, and the establishment's . Registered branches must file annual confirmation statements and, depending on the parent company's size, submit copies of audited accounts to maintain transparency and compliance. This registration ensures the branch adheres to corporate governance standards while the parent remains accountable for obligations. In , the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) oversees the registration of foreign companies carrying on business through a branch, requiring submission of Form 402 along with certified copies of the company's constitution and details of directors, resulting in the issuance of an Australian Registered Body Number (ARBN). Branches are classified as permanent establishments for purposes under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, subjecting Australian-sourced profits to at 30% (or 25% for entities), and they must register for Goods and Services Tax (GST) with the Australian Taxation Office if annual turnover exceeds AUD 75,000. This setup integrates the branch into Australia's tax system without creating a separate corporate entity. Across these common law jurisdictions, a key trend is the emphasis on , where the parent company bears full responsibility for the branch's debts and obligations, as branches lack separate legal , promoting accountability without the need for complex structures. Additionally, setup is generally streamlined compared to more prescriptive systems, with online portals and standardized forms enabling quicker establishment—often within weeks—while relying on for interpretive flexibility in disputes. General registration principles, such as providing foundational documents, apply with local adaptations as outlined in broader frameworks.

Branch Offices in Civil Law Jurisdictions

In civil law jurisdictions, branch offices are governed by comprehensive statutory codes that emphasize formal registration, detailed disclosures, and ongoing compliance to ensure transparency and integration with local commercial frameworks. These systems, prevalent in countries like , , and , treat branches as direct extensions of the parent company without separate legal personality, requiring meticulous documentation to align with national economic regulations. In France, branch offices, known as succursales, must register with the Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce, the registry of the Commercial Court, to obtain official recognition and identifiers such as the SIREN and SIRET numbers. This process involves submitting a completed M0 application form, an original extract from the parent company's foreign registration, proof of the branch's address (e.g., lease contract), and identification of the branch manager with powers of attorney. The registration ensures the branch operates under French commercial codes, including mandatory VAT activation if applicable, and subjects it to local tax and labor laws as an extension of the foreign entity. Germany regulates branch offices, termed Zweigniederlassung, through entry in the Handelsregister, the national commercial register maintained by local courts. For autonomous branches capable of independent operations, registration requires notarized submission of the parent company's , a description of the branch's activities, proof of address, and appointment of a local representative. Dependent branches, which lack operational autonomy, still necessitate basic Handelsregister entry and trade office (Gewerbeamt) notification to disclose business scope and ensure compliance with the German Commercial Code (HGB). This framework mandates detailed activity disclosures to prevent and facilitates public access to branch information via the register. Japan's approach involves filing with the Legal Affairs Bureau under the , treating branches as non-independent extensions of foreign companies that must appoint a local representative to handle legal obligations. Registration requires an from the head office attesting to the branch's establishment, the representative's appointment, articles of incorporation, and a outline, culminating in issuance of a registration certificate essential for banking and contracts. A registration tax of 90,000 yen is payable, and the branch seal must be registered for official use, emphasizing administrative precision in line with Japan's Companies Act. Key differences in these civil law systems include a heavier emphasis on codified documentation—such as notarized powers and activity reports—compared to the more interpretive flexibility in other jurisdictions, alongside requirements for periodic updates to registries for ongoing transparency and regulatory oversight. This prescriptive structure prioritizes statutory compliance to mitigate risks of non-conformity in integrated markets.

References

  1. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/branch-office.asp
  2. https://thelawdictionary.org/branch-office/
  3. https://www.ilpabogados.com/en/the-essential-corporate-law-in-the-united-states-usa/
  4. https://msadvisory.com/branch-office-definition/
  5. https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/key-topics/residential-supervisory-locations/office-classifications
  6. https://goglobal.com/blog/entity-establishment/representative-office-vs-subsidiary-vs-branch-office-whats-best-for-expanding-internationally/
  7. https://www.etymonline.com/word/branch
  8. https://www.rapid.one/blog/branch-vs-subsidiary
  9. https://remotepeople.com/glossary/branch-office/
  10. https://www.commenda.io/incorporation/division-and-subsidiary-difference/
  11. https://www.supermoney.com/encyclopedia/branch-office
  12. https://hbr.org/2022/03/how-much-autonomy-should-you-give-your-global-teams
  13. https://blog.landscapeprofessionals.org/branching-out-balancing-autonomy-and-oversight-while-expanding/
  14. https://engageware.com/blog/virtual-branches/
  15. https://www.deel.com/blog/subsidiary-vs-branch/
  16. https://www.mspinsights.com/doc/branch-office-vs-subsidiary-it-s-a-critical-choice-when-expanding-your-business-globally-0001
  17. https://www.usemultiplier.com/subsidiary-management/subsidiary-vs-branch
  18. https://www.agilelegal.com/business-law-news/branch-vs-subsidiary-which-structure-is-right-for-your-global-operations
  19. https://www.foley.com/insights/publications/2023/11/multinational-company-intl-compliance-program/
  20. https://www.natlawreview.com/article/five-compliance-best-practices-every-multinational-company-should-consider-0
  21. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/bnp-paribas-agrees-plead-guilty-and-pay-89-billion-illegally-processing-financial
  22. https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/enforcement20140630a.htm
  23. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/branch-manager.asp
  24. https://guides.library.jhu.edu/business/company/hierarchy
  25. https://resources.workable.com/international-recruitment-policy
  26. https://blog.uwgb.edu/intro-hrm/chapter-14-international-hrm/14-2-staffing-internationally/
  27. https://www.adp.com/spark/articles/2016/03/employee-knowledge-for-international-expansion-hiring-locally-vs-transferring-expats.aspx
  28. https://www.clearpointstrategy.com/blog/bank-kpis
  29. https://www.performyard.com/articles/banking-performance-management
  30. https://www.winman.com/blog/improve-communications-across-multiple-businesses-with-erp
  31. https://www.codezone-eg.com/en/blog/how-erp-systems-unify-operations-across-multi-branch-enterprises
  32. https://www.sfmagazine.com/articles/2020/december/budgeting-for-international-operations/
  33. https://open.lib.umn.edu/internationalbusiness/chapter/15-4-financial-management-in-international-business/
  34. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/consolidatedfinancialstatement.asp
  35. https://bcom.institute/financial-accounting/allocating-head-office-expenses-to-branches/
  36. https://www.aicountly.com/help/learning/adjustments-for-consolidation-of-branch-accounts/
  37. https://www.aicountly.com/help/learning/translation-of-foreign-branch-accounts/
  38. https://bpion.com/keeping-accounting-records-according-to-ias-ifrs-requirements/
  39. https://www.crowe.com/insights/framework-for-transfer-pricing-guide
  40. https://perfectaccounting.in/internal-audit-best-practices-for-multinational-corporations/
  41. https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstreams/e84854d2-efb5-460f-907d-667248006d09/download
  42. https://www.royaltyrange.com/news/key-aspects-of-transfer-pricing-audit/
  43. https://www.skuad.io/blog/branch-vs-subsidiary-which-is-the-best-for-global-expansion
  44. https://www.justworks.com/blog/opening-subsidiary-vs-branch
  45. https://www.gloroots.com/blog/branch-vs-subsidiary
  46. https://geosinternational.com/subsidiary-vs-branch/
  47. https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/challenges-of-international-business
  48. https://www.inboundlogistics.com/articles/global-supply-chain-what-it-is-importance-and-challenges/
  49. https://www.ringcentral.com/us/en/blog/why-hybrid-hub-and-spoke-offices-may-be-the-norm-post-covid/
  50. https://www.sba.gov/business-guide/launch-your-business/register-your-business
  51. https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/five-steps-when-doing-business-in-a-new-state
  52. https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-1120-f
  53. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i1120f.pdf
  54. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/overseas-companies-in-the-uk-registration-filing-and-disclosure-obligations/overseas-companies-registered-in-the-uk
  55. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/part/34
  56. https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/guidance/registration-of-overseas-companies-in-the-uk
  57. https://www.asic.gov.au/for-business-and-companies/foreign-companies/register-a-foreign-company-in-australia/
  58. https://www.bentleys.com.au/resources/international-tax-guide-for-foreign-companies-doing-business-in-australia/
  59. https://www.boodlehatfield.com/insights/102h0z2/why-common-law-legal-systems-are-better-for-businesses
  60. https://ppp.worldbank.org/key-features-common-and-civil-law-systems
  61. https://www.greffe-tae-paris.fr/en/procedure/branch-office-registered-office-in-a-foreign-country
  62. https://asanify.com/blog/employer-of-record-france/register-business-france-2025-legal-compliance-roadmap/
  63. https://companyformationfrance.com/establish-branch-france/
  64. https://www.gtai.de/en/invest/investment-guide/company-set-up-in-germany
  65. https://www.nrwglobalbusiness.com/investing-in-nrw/business-guide-to-north-rhine-westphalia/company-set-up/branch-offices
  66. https://www.rosepartner.de/en/legal/subsidiary-branch-office-germany-law.html
  67. https://www.jetro.go.jp/usa/procedures-for-registering-a-business-in-japan.html
  68. https://samurai-law.com/en/col03_05.html
  69. https://hgo.jp/en/business/branch-registration/
  70. https://www.moj.go.jp/ENGLISH/m_hisho06_00034.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.