Hubbry Logo
Climb (aeronautics)Climb (aeronautics)Main
Open search
Climb (aeronautics)
Community hub
Climb (aeronautics)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Climb (aeronautics)
Climb (aeronautics)
Climb (aeronautics)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
An Iberia Airbus A321 on the climbout from London Heathrow Airport

In aviation, a climb or ascent is the operation of increasing the altitude of an aircraft. It is also the logical phase of a typical flight (the climb phase or climbout) following takeoff and preceding the cruise. During the climb phase there is an increase in altitude to a predetermined level.[1] The opposite of a climb is a descent.

Climb operation

[edit]

A steady climb is carried out by using excess thrust, the amount by which the thrust from the power plant exceeds the drag on the aircraft.[2]: § 15.1  The aircraft will climb steadily until the excess thrust falls to zero.[2]: § 15.8  Excess thrust might fall to zero as a result of the pilot's deliberate action in control of the output of the engines, or as the engines' response to reducing air density.

Climb phase

[edit]
A Boeing 737 climbing

The climb phase, also known as climb-out or initial climb, is the period during which the aircraft climbs to a predetermined cruising altitude after take-off.[3] The climb phase immediately follows take-off and precedes the cruise phase of the flight. Although a single climb phase is typical, multiple climb phases may alternate with cruise phases, particularly for very long flights in which altitude is increased as the weight of fuel aboard decreases (see step climb).

As the climb progresses, the rate of climb decreases as thrust reduces due to reducing air density. A gradual climb improves forward visibility over the nose of the aircraft.

Aircraft also climb when flying in a zone of rising air, but since such zones are unpredictable and inconveniently located, and since most are poorly adapted to passive climbs of this type, only gliders attempt such climbs on a regular basis.

Normal climb

[edit]
A Boeing 747-400 of British Airways climbing out from London Heathrow, viewed from the River Thames at Bray Lock.

In some jurisdictions and under some conditions, normal climbs are defined by regulations or procedures, and are used to develop airway systems, airspaces, and instrument procedures. Normal climbs are simply standardized climb rates achievable by most aircraft under most conditions that are used as conservative guidelines when developing procedures or structures that are partially a function of such rates. For example, a normal climb of 20 meters per km (120 feet per nautical mile) might be assumed during the development of a navigational procedure or while defining airspace limits in airport terminal areas.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Climb (aeronautics)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In , a climb is the phase of flight during which an ascends to gain altitude, achieved by applying excess from its engines to produce a vertical component of velocity that counters and drag forces along an inclined flight path. This maneuver begins immediately after takeoff or during en route adjustments and continues until the desired altitude is reached or level flight is established, with the aircraft's pitch attitude adjusted via elevators to maintain the climb while balancing lift perpendicular to the flight path. Climb performance is fundamentally governed by the excess power available beyond that required for level flight at a given weight, , and altitude, expressed as the (ROC) in feet per minute, where ROC equals excess power divided by weight. Key metrics include the best speed (Vy), which maximizes altitude gain over time for efficient en route ascent, and the best angle of climb speed (Vx), which optimizes altitude gain over distance to clear obstacles during takeoff. Other variants, such as cruise climb, involve maintaining constant power settings to gradually increase altitude as fuel burn reduces weight, commonly used in long-range flights. Several factors critically influence climb capability, including aircraft weight, which inversely affects ROC by increasing the power required; atmospheric conditions like , where higher temperatures or elevations reduce engine and propeller efficiency; and configuration elements such as flap settings or position, which alter drag. Climb performance diminishes with increasing altitude due to decreasing air density, eventually reaching the absolute ceiling where ROC approaches zero or the service ceiling at 100 feet per minute. In multi-engine , regulatory standards under 14 CFR Part 23 mandate minimum climb gradients, such as 8.3% for all-engines-operating initial climb in levels 1 and 2 low-speed airplanes and at least 1% for one-engine-inoperative scenarios depending on airplane level, to ensure safety.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

In aeronautics, climb refers to the phase of flight in which an gains altitude by generating excess that exceeds aerodynamic drag, resulting in a positive vertical component of . This maneuver relies on the 's system providing more forward force than required to maintain level flight, allowing the flight path to angle upward. The primary purposes of climb are to reach operational cruising altitudes for en route , ensure safe clearance of and obstacles during takeoff and initial ascent, and enhance overall by ascending to higher altitudes where reduced air density lowers induced and . Historically, climb performance evolved from the rudimentary demonstrations in early powered flight, such as the ' 1903 Flyer trials, which achieved controlled ascents up to about 10-15 feet despite limited engine power of 12 horsepower, proving the feasibility of sustained altitude gain in heavier-than-air machines. By the 1940s, the (ICAO), established under the 1944 Chicago Convention, formalized global standards for aircraft climb capabilities to support safe international operations, including minimum requirements for certification. At its core, the physics of climb involves excess —calculated as minus drag—creating a that opposes the aircraft's weight component along the flight path, thereby enabling vertical acceleration and the conversion of energy into gravitational potential energy. This excess force, per Newton's second law, produces the upward motion essential for altitude increase while maintaining forward speed.

Climb Phases

The climb in is divided into distinct phases that provide a structured progression from takeoff to reaching the desired cruising altitude, ensuring safe and efficient ascent while adhering to configuration and regulatory requirements. These phases include the climb, en route climb, and transition to level flight, each marked by specific transitions such as attitude adjustments and configuration changes. The initial climb phase commences immediately after takeoff, once the has lifted off and a positive is confirmed, typically spanning from ground level to about 500 feet above ground level (AGL). During this short segment, the pilot rotates the to a climb attitude, often pitching the nose 10 to 15 degrees above the horizon to accelerate toward the best while maintaining full takeoff power. is retracted first upon establishing a positive climb, followed by a sequenced retraction of flaps in stages as builds, reducing drag and transitioning to a clean configuration for sustained ascent. This phase prioritizes clearance and rapid altitude gain in the vicinity of the airport. Following the initial phase, the en route climb involves a sustained ascent from a safe maneuvering altitude—often starting around 500 to 1,000 feet AGL—up to the planned cruise altitude, typically segmented by schedules to comply with rules. Below 10,000 feet mean (MSL), in the contiguous United States must not exceed 250 knots indicated , after which pilots accelerate to higher climb or cruise-climb speeds for efficiency. Power settings are adjusted to recommended climb values, and the aircraft is trimmed for steady ascent, with pilots monitoring visual references or instruments to maintain the desired pitch and speed. This phase allows for gradual configuration stabilization and preparation for higher-altitude operations. The transition to level flight occurs upon reaching the target altitude, involving a deceleration to cruise speed and a reduction in power to level-flight settings, typically with the nose pitched down to capture level attitude. The is retrimmed for straight-and-level flight, ensuring stability as it enters the cruise phase, with any remaining configuration adjustments completed if not already done during en route climb. This final segment minimizes vertical speed deviations and sets the stage for efficient en route travel.

Performance Metrics

Rate of Climb

The (ROC) is defined as an aircraft's vertical speed during ascent, representing the rate of change of altitude with respect to time, typically expressed in feet per minute (fpm) or meters per second (m/s). This metric quantifies the aircraft's ability to gain altitude efficiently, which is crucial for takeoff, clearance, and reaching cruising levels. The fundamental formula for ROC derives from the excess power available beyond that required for level flight, enabling the conversion of kinetic energy into potential energy. In steady climb, the vertical force balance yields sin⁡γ=T−DW\sin \gamma = \frac{T - D}{W}, where γ\gamma is the climb angle, TT is thrust, DD is drag, and WW is weight; thus, ROC = Vsin⁡γ=VT−DWV \sin \gamma = V \frac{T - D}{W}, with VV as true airspeed. Equivalently, in power terms, excess power ΔP=TV−DV\Delta P = T V - D V, so ROC = ΔPW\frac{\Delta P}{W}, where ΔP=Pav−Preq\Delta P = P_{av} - P_{req} (power available minus power required). This formulation assumes small climb angles and neglects acceleration terms; units align as follows: power in foot-pounds per second (ft-lb/s), weight in pounds (lb), yielding ROC in feet per second (ft/s), which is multiplied by 60 for fpm. For example, if excess power is 18,000 ft-lb/s and weight is 3,000 lb, ROC = 6 ft/s or 360 fpm. ROC is measured using the vertical speed indicator (VSI), which detects pressure changes via the 's pitot-static system to display instantaneous or trend vertical velocity, calibrated in fpm. Modern may also employ GPS-derived vertical speed for more precise, ground-referenced measurements unaffected by atmospheric pressure variations. Practical ROC values vary by type and conditions; for light like the , initial ROC typically ranges from 700 to 800 fpm at . In contrast, commercial jets such as the achieve initial ROC of 2,000 to 3,000 fpm during early climb phases to 5,000 feet. The service ceiling marks the altitude where maximum ROC diminishes to 100 fpm, defining the practical limit for sustained climb in piston-engine (or 500 fpm for jets), beyond which level flight becomes challenging due to reduced .

Climb Gradient

The climb gradient is defined as the of the vertical gained in altitude to the horizontal traveled over the ground, typically expressed as a . A 3% climb gradient, for instance, indicates that the ascends 3 feet vertically for every 100 feet of forward ground travel. This metric is essential for ensuring clearance during departure and approach phases, as it quantifies in terms of path steepness rather than time. The climb gradient can also be represented as an angle (the flight path angle γ relative to the horizontal) or in units of feet per nautical mile (ft/NM), where 1% equates to approximately 60.76 ft/NM. The rate of climb serves as a key input for its computation, linking vertical speed to horizontal progress. The gradient G is fundamentally given by G=tan⁡γG = \tan \gamma, where γ is the flight path angle. For small angles typical in aircraft climbs (γ < 10°), tan⁡γ≈sin⁡γ\tan \gamma \approx \sin \gamma, and sin⁡γ=ROCV\sin \gamma = \frac{\text{ROC}}{V}, with ROC as the rate of climb and V as the speed along the flight path. In still air, groundspeed GS approximates V (since cos⁡γ≈1\cos \gamma \approx 1), yielding the percentage gradient as G(%)≈(ROCGS)×100%G (\%) \approx \left( \frac{\text{ROC}}{\text{GS}} \right) \times 100\%, provided ROC and GS are in consistent units such as feet per minute. In aviation practice, with ROC in feet per minute (fpm) and GS in knots, a close approximation holds due to unit conversion factors (GS in ft/min ≈ GS_knots × 101.27), resulting in G(%)≈ROC (fpm)GS (knots)G (\%) \approx \frac{\text{ROC (fpm)}}{\text{GS (knots)}}, with an error under 1.3% for typical values; more precisely, the gradient in ft/NM is ROC×60GS\frac{\text{ROC} \times 60}{\text{GS}}, and percentage is that value divided by 60.76. Certification standards for climb gradients in transport category aircraft, as outlined in FAA 14 CFR Part 25 and ICAO Annex 8, focus on minimum requirements primarily for one-engine-inoperative (OEI) scenarios to ensure airworthiness. For two-engine turbine-powered transport jets, the second segment OEI climb gradient (gear retracted, up to 400 ft above takeoff surface) must be at least 2.4%, while the final en route segment requires 1.2%. These minima vary by engine count and phase, with ICAO aligning closely to provide international harmonization for airworthiness. In operational procedures, all-engines-operating (AEO) climbs for departures typically assume a minimum gradient of 200 ft/NM (approximately 3.3%), as specified in standard instrument departure criteria such as FAA TERPS or ICAO PANS-OPS. Climb gradients for specific aircraft are determined using performance charts in the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM). For the Boeing 737 series, charts plot gradient against parameters like weight, pressure altitude, and temperature; for example, at sea level standard conditions with a takeoff weight of 170,000 lb and initial climb speed of 165 knots, an all-engines-operating rate of climb of about 2,500 fpm yields a gross gradient of approximately 15% via the formula G(%)≈2500165G (\%) \approx \frac{2500}{165}. One-engine-inoperative second segment charts for the same conditions show the certified minimum 2.4% at maximum weights near 174,000 lb, limiting allowable takeoff mass to meet regulatory clearance. The gross climb gradient reflects the aircraft's actual certified performance under ideal conditions, derived directly from flight test data and aerodynamic models. In contrast, the net climb gradient subtracts a regulatory decrement from the gross value—typically 0.8% for two-engine aircraft—to incorporate margins for pilot technique, instrument errors, and minor deviations, ensuring at least 35 feet of obstacle clearance. Wind effects primarily impact the net gradient in operational planning, as headwinds reduce groundspeed and enhance the effective gradient over ground distance, while tailwinds do the opposite; certification assumes still air, but procedures like those in FAA AC 120-91 adjust net values for expected wind to maintain safety margins.

Influencing Factors

Aerodynamic and Configuration Effects

The angle of attack (AOA) is fundamental to climb performance, as it determines the balance between lift production and induced drag on the wing. During a climb, the aircraft maintains an appropriate AOA to achieve near-maximum lift-to-drag (L/D) ratio, where induced drag is minimized relative to the lift required to support the aircraft's weight while directing excess power toward vertical ascent. This optimal AOA allows the wing to generate sufficient lift at the climb airspeed without excessive energy dissipation through wingtip vortices, which become more pronounced at higher angles. Aircraft configuration profoundly influences climb efficiency by altering total aerodynamic drag, which directly competes with the excess power available for altitude gain. A clean configuration—flaps retracted and landing gear up—minimizes parasite and induced drag, enabling sustained climb rates closer to the aircraft's design limits. In contrast, a dirty configuration with extended flaps or down landing gear disrupts smooth airflow, significantly increasing drag and thereby reducing climb capability, as more thrust is diverted to overcome this penalty rather than propel the aircraft upward. For instance, extended landing gear adds significant form drag due to its bluff shape, while flaps introduce both form and interference drag, compounding the effect during low-speed climb segments. Wing design, particularly aspect ratio, plays a key role in optimizing climb through improved aerodynamic efficiency. High-aspect-ratio wings, characterized by long spans relative to chord length, reduce induced drag by weakening wingtip vortices and enhancing the overall L/D ratio, which supports better sustained climb performance under high-lift conditions. These wings excel in converting excess power into altitude gain with less energy loss, as seen in gliders and long-range airliners where induced drag dominates at climb speeds. Lower-aspect-ratio wings, while structurally robust, incur higher induced drag, limiting their climb effectiveness in scenarios requiring prolonged ascent. Spoilers and speed brakes are typically prohibited or severely restricted during climb to preserve performance margins, as their deployment generates substantial drag and can reduce lift without providing any ascent benefit. These devices, intended for descent control or roll augmentation, would counteract the excess power needed for climb by increasing total drag and potentially destabilizing the flight path at low speeds. Aircraft operating handbooks explicitly advise against their use in climb phases to avoid degraded rates of ascent and increased stall risk. A practical example of configuration management in climb involves flap settings during takeoff and initial ascent. Takeoff flaps are often set at 10-20 degrees to augment lift for rotation and obstacle clearance, but they must be retracted progressively once a positive climb is established, typically by 1,000 feet above ground level, to reduce drag and transition to a clean setup for optimal en-route climb. This retraction sequence ensures initial performance for departure while prioritizing efficiency as altitude increases.

Power and Environmental Influences

Power and environmental factors significantly influence climb performance in aeronautics by altering the excess thrust or power available for vertical ascent. Propulsion systems, particularly engine type, determine how thrust varies with altitude, directly impacting the rate of climb (ROC) and gradient. Piston engines, commonly used in general aviation, experience a power lapse of approximately 3.5% per 1,000 feet of altitude due to reduced air density and oxygen availability for combustion. In contrast, turbofan engines in commercial jets exhibit a more gradual initial thrust reduction but lose thrust to approximately 20-25% of sea-level values by 40,000 feet, as lower ambient pressure and temperature decrease the mass of air ingested, despite the engine's design for high-altitude efficiency. This altitude-dependent thrust lapse necessitates optimized climb schedules, such as step climbs, to maintain performance. Environmental conditions, especially density altitude, further degrade climb capabilities by reducing both engine power and aerodynamic lift. Density altitude increases in high, hot, or humid environments, where elevated temperatures expand air molecules and humidity displaces denser dry air, leading to up to 30% power loss in normally aspirated engines at 8,000 feet density altitude compared to standard conditions. Consequently, ROC diminishes proportionally, often requiring longer takeoff rolls and shallower initial climbs, as seen in operations from airports like Denver (5,000 feet elevation) on hot days. Aircraft weight exacerbates these effects, with climb performance degrading inversely with gross weight; the fundamental relation is given by ROC∝Pa−PrW,\text{ROC} \propto \frac{P_a - P_r}{W}, where PaP_a is power available, PrP_r is power required for level flight, and WW is aircraft weight, illustrating that excess power per unit weight drives vertical speed. For payload trade-offs, operators may reduce fuel or cargo—e.g., limiting payload by 10% on a 2,500-pound aircraft to boost ROC by about 11%—to ensure safe clearance over terrain in weight-limited scenarios, balancing mission requirements against certification mandates. Atmospheric disturbances like wind shear and turbulence introduce variability in effective climb paths. Headwinds increase the climb gradient by reducing groundspeed (GS), since gradient = ROC / GS; a 20-knot headwind can enhance the measured gradient by 15-20% for the same airspeed-based ROC, aiding obstacle clearance. However, wind shear—rapid changes in wind speed or direction—can erode airspeed during climb, potentially halving excess thrust in severe cases like microbursts, leading to temporary ROC reductions or stalls if not countered with maximum thrust. Turbulence from gusts similarly disrupts steady ascent, increasing pilot workload and effective drag through oscillatory motions, which can cut net ROC by inducing phugoid oscillations that amplify energy losses. In multi-engine aircraft, the one-engine inoperative (OEI) condition represents a critical power influence, where certification ensures minimum climb gradients to maintain safety post-failure. For transport-category twin-engine airplanes, Federal Aviation Regulations require a steady climb gradient of at least 2.4% during the second segment of takeoff (gear retracted, at V2 speed) with the critical engine out and remaining engines at takeoff power. This standard, derived from FAR 25.121, accounts for asymmetric and drag, mandating performance data in flight manuals for OEI climb planning, often interacting with aerodynamic configurations to meet the threshold.

Operational Procedures

Normal and Best-Rate Climbs

In normal climbs, pilots maintain a constant airspeed recommended by the aircraft manufacturer, typically higher than the best rate-of-climb speed to enhance engine cooling, improve control authority, and provide better forward visibility. For light aircraft such as the Cessna 172S, this enroute or normal climb speed is generally 75-85 knots indicated airspeed (KIAS) at sea level, achieved by applying full throttle and adjusting pitch attitude to hold the target speed while monitoring the airspeed indicator. Power is set to the maximum allowable climb setting, often full throttle for piston-engine aircraft, with the mixture initially full rich below 3,000 feet to ensure adequate fuel flow for high-power operation. The best-rate climb, conducted at Vy—the airspeed yielding the maximum rate of climb—is used during the initial phase after takeoff to rapidly gain altitude efficiently, particularly when obstacle clearance is not the primary concern. is determined from the aircraft's performance charts, such as the Vx-Vy diagram in the pilot's operating (POH), and for the Cessna 172S, it is 74 KIAS at , decreasing slightly to 72 KIAS at higher altitudes like 10,000 feet. Pilots establish this climb by accelerating to shortly after liftoff, using full and a pitch attitude that prevents exceeding or falling below the target speed, often verified against the horizon before cross-checking instruments. Power management during climbs involves maintaining full initially, then adjusting as needed for altitude-induced air density changes to sustain ; for engines above 3,000 feet, the should be leaned to achieve maximum RPM or the smoothest operation, preventing overly rich conditions that reduce performance. Cowl flaps, if equipped, are opened to manage temperatures within limits specified by the manufacturer. Transition procedures from takeoff to enroute climb begin once a positive is confirmed, typically involving retraction of immediately after liftoff in retractable-gear , followed by flap retraction at 500 feet above the surface or when accelerating through a safe speed like 60-70 KIAS to avoid settling. The is then pitched to the normal climb speed, power reduced if transitioning from maximum takeoff power, and trimmed for hands-off flight to reduce pilot workload. In , emphasis is placed on precise control during climbs, as deviations can lead to settling back toward the ground if too slow or excessive if pitch is insufficient, both of which compromise safety and performance; pilots practice pitch adjustments using visual references and instruments to maintain or normal climb speeds within ±5 knots.

Climb in Flight Operations

In flight operations, climb procedures are integral to departure planning, where Standard Instrument Departures () are predefined routes that specify minimum climb gradients and altitudes to ensure obstacle clearance and efficient integration into the airspace system. These procedures typically require a standard minimum gradient of 200 feet per (ft/NM) from the departure end of the , though higher gradients—such as 280 ft/NM to a specific altitude like 2,500 feet—may be mandated based on terrain or obstacles. Pilots must verify performance against these requirements prior to takeoff, adjusting for factors like weight and configuration to comply with (ATC) clearances that authorize the SID execution. Fuel and time optimization during climb is managed through flight management systems (FMS) in , which compute climb schedules based on a cost index that balances consumption against time-related costs. The cost index, entered by the crew, directs the FMS to select speeds and settings—often termed ECON speeds—that minimize total operating expenses, such as prioritizing shallower climbs for savings on long-haul flights or steeper profiles for time-critical operations. These schedules are precomputed during and updated in real-time, incorporating variables like wind and temperature to adhere to ATC constraints while achieving optimal economic performance. Safety protocols emphasize immediate and decisive action in go-around scenarios, where pilots apply full power upon aborting a to establish a positive , confirming vertical progress via instruments before retracting flaps or gear. This ensures separation from the and obstacles, with the procedure transitioning to a standard departure climb once stabilized. Regulatory compliance extends to noise abatement measures, such as reduced power settings below 3,000 feet above airport elevation to minimize community impact, while still meeting minimum climb gradients; ATC clearances often include specific instructions to integrate these with SID requirements. Emergency climbs following engine failure invoke one-engine-inoperative (OEI) procedures, requiring pilots to secure the failed engine, identify the operative one, and pitch for the best climb speed to maximize single-engine . If the cannot maintain altitude, a drift-down path is followed, descending at a controlled rate to the single-engine service ceiling where a positive climb rate of at least 50 feet per minute can be sustained, allowing safe navigation to an alternate . for these contingencies includes preflight assessment of drift-down altitudes over , ensuring compliance with certification standards for net flight path gradients. adjustments are briefly considered in such to account for reduced in high-temperature or high-elevation conditions.

References

  1. https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/VirtualAero/BottleRocket/airplane/climb.html
  2. https://eaglepubs.erau.edu/introductiontoaerospaceflightvehicles/chapter/climbing-ceiling-gliding/
  3. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/airplane_handbook/07_afh_ch6.pdf
  4. https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/pcg_html/glossary-c.html
  5. https://www.boldmethod.com/learn-to-fly/performance/why-aircraft-weight-increase-affects-your-climb-performance/
  6. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-23/subpart-B
  7. https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/VirtualAero/BottleRocket/airplane/exthrst.html
  8. https://pressbooks.lib.vt.edu/aerodynamics/chapter/chapter-5-altitude-change-climb-and-guide/
  9. https://blog.openairlines.com/22-fuel-efficiency-procedures-for-flight-ops
  10. https://www.nasa.gov/history/115-years-ago-wright-brothers-make-history-at-kitty-hawk/
  11. https://applications.icao.int/postalhistory/the_air_navigation_conferences.htm
  12. https://skybrary.aero/sites/default/files/bookshelf/2263.pdf
  13. https://www.faasafety.gov/files/notices/2015/Nov/FAA_P-8740-66.pdf
  14. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/10_phak_ch8.pdf
  15. https://skybrary.aero/articles/vertical-speed-indicator
  16. https://cessna.txtav.com/en/piston/cessna-skyhawk
  17. https://skybrary.aero/aircraft/b738
  18. https://code7700.com/takeoff_climb_gradient.htm
  19. https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/26385/what-is-the-difference-between-rate-of-climb-and-climb-gradient
  20. https://www.cfinotebook.net/notebook/aerodynamics-and-performance/performance-calculations.php
  21. https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/community/threads/calculating-climb-gradient.45412/
  22. https://www.ryanfergusondpe.com/useful-formulas/
  23. https://nbaa.org/aircraft-operations/safety/in-flight-safety/aircraft-climb-performance/one-engine-inoperative-takeoff-planning-and-climb-performance/
  24. https://ffac.ch/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ICAO-Annex-8-Airworthiness-of-Aircraft.pdf
  25. https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim_html/chap5_section_2.html
  26. https://www.theairlinepilots.com/forumarchive/quickref/flightmanualperformance.pdf
  27. https://www.avsim.com/forums/topic/365445-how-to-dertermine-climb-gradient/
  28. https://www.engineeringpilot.com/post/2019/05/16/climb
  29. https://flyapg.com/kb/what-is-the-difference-between-gross-and-net-flight-paths-in-takeoff-performance
  30. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_120-91A.pdf
  31. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/07_phak_ch5_0.pdf
  32. https://pressbooks.lib.vt.edu/aerodynamics/chapter/chapter-3-additional-aerodynamic-tools/
  33. https://www.boldmethod.com/learn-to-fly/aircraft-systems/how-does-aspect-ratio-affect-aircraft-wings/
  34. https://eaglepubs.erau.edu/introductiontoaerospaceflightvehicles/chapter/wing-shapes-and-nomenclature/
  35. https://skybrary.aero/articles/spoilers-and-speedbrakes
  36. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/airplane_handbook/06_afh_ch5.pdf
  37. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/airplane_handbook/10_afh_ch9.pdf
  38. https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/14088/if-flaps-are-used-on-takeoff-when-should-they-be-retracted
  39. https://scaaonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/SCAA-Palmetto-Aviation-Summer2020-Density-Altitude-FINAL.pdf
  40. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/03_amtp_ch1.pdf
  41. https://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1453913
  42. https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/phak/media/13_phak_ch11.pdf
  43. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19830013440/downloads/19830013440.pdf
  44. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-25/subpart-B/subject-group-ECFR14f0e2fcc647a42/section-25.121
  45. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/airplane_handbook/04_afh_ch3.pdf
  46. https://www.befa.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/POH-Cessna-172S.pdf
  47. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/instrument_procedures_handbook/FAA-H-8083-16B_Chapter_1.pdf
  48. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/apl/ge_fms.pdf
  49. https://ansperformance.eu/library/airbus-cost-index.pdf
  50. https://safetyfirst.airbus.com/app/themes/mh_newsdesk/documents/archives/the-go-around-procedure.pdf
  51. https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/sp-files/environmental-protection/Documents/ReviewNADRD.pdf
  52. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/airplane_handbook/14_afh_ch13.pdf
  53. https://skybrary.aero/articles/driftdown-procedure
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.