Hubbry Logo
2002 Commonwealth Games2002 Commonwealth GamesMain
Open search
2002 Commonwealth Games
Community hub
2002 Commonwealth Games
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
2002 Commonwealth Games
2002 Commonwealth Games
2002 Commonwealth Games
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
XVII Commonwealth Games
Host cityManchester, England
MottoThe Spirit of Friendship[1]
Nations72[2]
Athletes3,863
Events281 in 17 sports
Opening25 July 2002
Closing4 August 2002
Opened byElizabeth II
Closed byElizabeth II
Athlete's OathJames Hickman
Queen's Baton Final RunnerDavid Beckham and
Kirsty Howard
AnthemWhere My Heart Will Take Me by Russell Watson
Main venueCity of Manchester Stadium
← XVI
XVIII →

The 2002 Commonwealth Games, officially known as the XVII Commonwealth Games and commonly known as Manchester 2002, were an international multi-sport event for the members of the Commonwealth held in Manchester, England, from 25 July to 4 August 2002. According to planning, this event was to be held in a country in the United Kingdom as part of the Golden Jubilee of Elizabeth II, head of the Commonwealth. England was the only bidder for the event and, in an internal process, Manchester was selected for the 2002 Games ahead of London. The Manchester bid used projects which were part of the failed bid for the 2000 Summer Olympics and Paralympics, which were awarded to Sydney, Australia.[3] The 2002 Commonwealth Games was, prior to the 2012 Summer Olympics, the largest multi-sport event ever to be held in the UK, eclipsing the London 1948 Summer Olympics in terms of teams and athletes participating.[4][5] The 2002 Commonwealth Games had the largest number of events of any Commonwealth Games in history, featuring 281 events across 17 sports.

The event was considered a success for the host city, providing an opportunity to display how Manchester reeinvented itself as city, following the 1996 IRA bombing.[6] The Games formed the main catalyst for the widespread regeneration and heavy development of Manchester and bolstered its reputation as a European and global city internationally. Rapid economic development and continued urban regeneration of the now post-industrial Manchester continued after the Games, which helped cement its place as one of the principal cultural cities in the United Kingdom.[7]

The opening and closing ceremonies, the athletics, and the rugby sevens events were held at the City of Manchester Stadium, which was purpose-built for the Games. Unusually for a Commonwealth Games, the only sport that was held outside the host city was shooting, which was held in the National Shooting Centre in Bisley, Surrey, some 200 miles (322 km) from Manchester. Seventy-two associations competed in 14 individual sports and 3 team sports events.

Sporting legacy includes the British Cycling team, which inherited the Manchester Velodrome and went on to win eight gold medals at the 2008 Olympics and another eight gold medals at the 2012 Olympics, partly attributed to the availability of the velodrome. The stadium was leased long-term to Manchester City F.C., and, as a result, they have since found themselves in a desirable investment opportunity in the age of foreign football investment. The club was taken over by the Abu Dhabi United Group led by Sheikh Mansour in 2008, a takeover that would have been far less certain without the stadium.[8][9] The Games were a formative moment for Manchester and Britain, with then-IOC president Jacques Rogge viewing the games as an important litmus test as to whether Britain could host the Summer Olympics.[10][11] The success of the Games quickly encouraged some speculation of a city bid for the Olympics, but London bid for the 2012 Summer Olympics and Paralympics, with London going on to win the bid on 6 July 2005 and the games were successfully staged seven years later.[12]

Host city selection

[edit]
Manchester was selected by the Commonwealth Games Council of England as the official bid city from England for the 2002 Commonwealth Games.

When England decided to bid for the 2002 Commonwealth Games, three English cities – London, Manchester and Sheffield -showed interest in hosting the Games. The Commonwealth Games Council of England (CGCE) had to choose one city to put forward to the Commonwealth Games Federation (CGF). London had hosted the 1934 Commonwealth Games as well as the 1908 and 1948 Summer Olympics, while Sheffield had hosted the 1991 Summer Universiade. Manchester had unsuccessfully bid for the 1996 and 2000 Summer Olympics, and Bob Scott, chairman of the Olympic bid committees, led the bid for another big event.[13]

Sheffield withdrew from the bidding process when the city was unable to come to agreement over financial guarantees.[14] This left the 24 members of the CGCE to choose between Manchester and London, with Manchester winning 17–7.[3][15] Cities from no other countries submitted bids and so Manchester was announced as the host city of the 2002 Games on 6 November 1995.[16]

2002 Commonwealth Games bidding results
City Nation Votes
Manchester England Unanimous

Preparation and development

[edit]

Venues

[edit]
The City of Manchester Stadium hosted Athletics and Rugby Sevens events
Manchester Aquatics Centre hosted Diving and Swimming events
The Manchester Arena hosted the boxing and netball events
Manchester Velodrome hosted the track cycling programme
Manchester Central Convention Complex hosted gymnastics, judo, weightlifting and wrestling
Bolton Arena hosted badminton

The Games' main venue was the City of Manchester Stadium (now Etihad Stadium), which hosted all athletics events, the rugby sevens and the opening and closing ceremonies. The stadium was a smaller and downscaled version of that proposed during Manchester's bid for the 2000 Summer Olympics. Construction started in January 2000,[17] and was completed shortly before the Games. The cost was approximately £110 million, £77 million of which was provided by Sport England, with the remainder funded by Manchester City Council.[18] For the Commonwealth Games the stadium featured a single lower tier running around three sides of the athletics track, and second tiers to the two sides, with an open-air temporary stand at one end, giving an overall capacity of 41,000.[19] The stadium formed the centrepiece of an area known as Sportcity. Other venues in Sportcity include the Manchester Velodrome, which hosted cycling, and the £3.5 million National Squash Centre, which was built specifically for the Games.[20]

Swimming and diving events took place at Manchester Aquatics Centre, another purpose-built venue, and until 2012,was the only one in the United Kingdom with two 50 metre pools.[21]

The Manchester Arena built in 1994, at the time was the largest arena in Europe hosted netball finals and boxing preliminares.[22]

The shooting events were held at the National Shooting Centre (NSC), Bisley (located in Surrey). The NSC saw major redevelopment of all its ranges in order to host the fullbore rifle, smallbore rifle, pistol and clay target events.

Athletes' village

[edit]

The athletes' village of the event was located in the residential area of the University of Manchester Fallowfield Campus, in an area of 30 acres, being built specifically for the event and after the event, the buildings were donated to the university and turned an expansion of the housing complex.[23]

Queen's jubilee baton relay

[edit]
The Queen's Baton Relay passes through Wolverhampton before the 2002 Commonwealth Games in Manchester.

The 2002 Queen's Jubilee Baton Relay, the continuation of a tradition that started with the 1958 Games, consisted of the relay of an electronic baton, containing a personal message from Elizabeth II across 23 Commonwealth nations. The relay culminated in the arrival of the baton at the City of Manchester Stadium, opening the Games. The speech was then removed electronically from the baton, and read by Her Majesty to open the Games.[24]

The 2002 Baton itself was designed by a company called IDEO, and was constructed of machined aluminium with the handle plated for conductivity. It weighed 1.69 kg, reached over 710 mm, and was 42.5 mm to 85 mm in diameter. The Queen's message itself was held in an aluminium capsule inserted into the top of the Baton. On either side of the Baton were two sterling silver coins, designed by Mappin and Webb, which celebrated the City of Manchester as host of the XVII Commonwealth Games.

The Baton was also equipped with sensors that detected and monitored the Runner's pulse rate. This information was then conveyed to a series of light-emitting diodes (LEDs), via a light behaviour module. The lens then transformed the LEDs into a shaft of bright blue pulsating light which synchronised with each new Runner. The hearts of the Runner and the Baton then beat as one until it was passed on, symbolising the journey of humanity and the essence of life.

The Queen's Jubilee Baton Relay passed through over 500 cities, towns and villages across the UK and the Baton was carried by 5,000 individuals, with each Runner carrying the Baton up to 500 yards, however on Saturday 15 June, the baton was snatched from a runners hand in the town of Connah's Quay, Deeside in north Wales.

The UK Baton Runners were made up of people from all walks of life including athletes, celebrities and local heroes from all over the country. Around 2500 Jubilee Runners were nominated by the community to carry the Baton, because they made a special contribution to their community or achieved a personal goal against the odds.

The judging of the Jubilee Runners was conducted by a panel of judges under the supervision of The Duke of Edinburgh's Award in January 2002. The relay was sponsored by Cadbury Schweppes, a major UK confectionery and soft drinks manufacturer.

Budget

[edit]

The cost of hosting the 2002 Commonwealth Games was estimated at £300 million.[25] Prior to the games, a £100 million was required to fill a financial black hole and the government agreed to provide the funding required,[26] despite some believing that £300 million was too much.[27]

Cultureshock and Festival Live

[edit]
See also: Cultureshock at the 2002 Commonwealth Games

Cultureshock was the Commonwealth Games Cultural Programme which ran alongside the Games themselves. The events ranged from images of the athlete as hero in sculpture and photography (Go! Freeze, which ran at Turton Tower in Bolton) to a Zulu performance at The Lowry. There was an exhibition at the Whitworth Art Gallery called Tales of Power: West African Textiles, and a performance of the film Monsoon Wedding at Clwyd Theatr Cymru. The geographical range was from Cheshire in the south to Blackburn and Cumbria in the north, and included that year the various Melas that take place around the region.

Cultureshock also ensured that a wide range of cultural events and acts reached the "man on the street", with the city centre of Manchester filled with bands, performers, and artists of various forms entertaining the thousands of visitors to the Games. It also coincided with the BBC's 2002 Festival Live series of open-air concerts and celebrations around the country, held to celebrate the Queen's Golden Jubilee. Many of the cultural events were covered by the BBC 2002 radio station covering the games.

Opening ceremony

[edit]
Opening Ceremony

The Project & Artistic Director for the Opening Ceremony was David Zolkwer. Five-time Olympic champion Sir Steve Redgrave opened the two-and-a-quarter-hour opening ceremony by banging a large drum, which initiated a co-ordinated dance and fireworks act. The champion rower was joined on the stage by sporting stars including yachtswoman Ellen MacArthur, heptathlete Denise Lewis, long-distance runner Moses Kiptanui, swimmer Susie O'Neill and sprinter Donovan Bailey. The Grenadier Guards shared the arena with pop band S Club and Salford-born opera singer Russell Watson sang the Games' theme, "Faith of the Heart", while the arrival of HM The Queen was greeted with a flypast by the Red Arrows. England football captain David Beckham helped chaperone Queen's Baton final runner Kirsty Howard, assisting the terminally ill six-year-old to hand the baton to The Queen. A 4,000-strong cast took part in the £12 million spectacular, which in theme and tone consisted of a mix of "pomp and pop", combining the ceremonial aspects of the Games with a party-style atmosphere, based on Manchester's reputation as the party city of "Madchester".[28] The ceremony was voiced by broadcaster Anthony Davis.

Athletes Parade at the Opening Ceremony

The traditional athletes' parade was led by previous hosts Malaysia, and England brought up the rear before The Queen as the Head of the Commonwealth, declared the Games open:

"All of us participating in this ceremony tonight, whether athletes or spectators, or those watching on television around the world, can share in the ideals of this unique association of nations,"

"We can all draw inspiration from what the Commonwealth stands for, our diversity as a source of strength, our tradition of tolerance ... our focus on young people, for they are our future."

"It is my pleasure in this my Golden Jubilee Year to declare the 17th Commonwealth Games open."[29]

Closing ceremony

[edit]

The Project & Artistic Director for the Closing Ceremony was David Zolkwer. The Queen ended 11 days of competition at a rain-drenched closing ceremony in the City of Manchester Stadium. She declared the Games closed in front of a 38,000 sell-out crowd gathered in the stadium. She also called on the athletes to assemble again in four years in Melbourne and to continue displaying the "friendship" they had shown in Manchester. The ceremony, attended by Prime Minister Tony Blair and several other dignitaries, took place in pouring rain and like the opening ceremony, mixed "pomp with pop". Australian Ian Thorpe, the star of the Games with his six swimming golds, carried his national flag into the arena, along with athletes from each of the other competing countries. Around 40,000 balloons were released into the rainy Manchester sky as the ceremony concluded with a spectacular fireworks display.

Closing ceremony highlights included:[30]

  • Children covering themselves with red, blue and white paint to portray a giant British flag before unveiling a giant portrait of The Queen as a Golden Jubilee gift.
  • The athletes bringing their national flags into the stadium
  • South African swimmer Natalie du Toit being honoured as the outstanding athlete of the Games.[31]
  • The symbolic handover of the Commonwealth Games Ceremonial Flag to Melbourne, host city for the 2006 Games.
  • A spectacular presentation with over 1,700 lanterns, which ended with the message 'Seek Peace' lit up in vast letters on the floor of the arena.
  • Coronation Street stars Steve Arnold and Tracy Shaw (who played characters Ashley and Maxine Peacock) arriving in one of 40 Morris Minors which became the centre of a song-and-dance showpiece.
  • Hip-hop DJ Grandmaster Flash encouraging the massed ranks to "make some noise" as athletes and volunteers poured into the arena to music from the likes of Will Young, Dave Stewart, Heather Small, Jimmy Cliff and Toploader.
  • Australian singer Vanessa Amorosi sang her signature tune, Shine and a song about the city of Melbourne, "I'll always be a Melbourne girl" just as it began to pour with rain.

Participating teams

[edit]

There were 73 participating countries, territories and Commonwealth regions at the 2002 Commonwealth Games. The 2002 event marked the last time Zimbabwe has participated to date; Zimbabwe formally withdrew from the Commonwealth of Nations the following year.[32]

Nations competed at the 2002 Commonwealth Games in Manchester
Participating Commonwealth Countries & Territories

Calendar

[edit]
OC Opening ceremony ● Event competitions 1 Gold medal events CC Closing ceremony
July/August 2002 July August Events
25th
Thu 		26th
Fri 		27th
Sat 		28th
Sun 		29th
Mon 		30th
Tue 		31st
Wed 		1st
Thu 		2nd
Fri 		3rd
Sat 		4th
Sun
Ceremonies OC CC N/a
Athletics 2 5 12 9 7 13 48
Badminton ● ● ● ● 1 ● ● ● ● 5 6
Boxing ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 12 12
Cycling 2 2 2 1 2 3 3 2 17
Diving 2 2 2 6
Gymnastics 1 1 2 10 14
Hockey ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 1 1 2
Judo 4 5 5 14
Lawn bowls 1 1 1 1 4 8
Netball ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 1 1
Rugby sevens ● ● 1 1
Shooting 5 6 5 6 3 6 4 5 40
Squash ● ● ● ● ● 2 ● ● ● 3 5
Swimming 5 5 9 5 11 7 42
Synchronised swimming 1 1 2
Triathlon 2 2
Table tennis ● ● ● ● 2 ● ● ● 2 4 8
Weightlifting 9 9 9 9 10 46
Wrestling ● 4 3 7
Daily medal events 2 6 16 22 26 36 40 33 21 48 31 281
Cumulative total 2 8 24 46 72 108 148 181 202 250 281
July/August 2002 25th
Thu 		26th
Fri 		27th
Sat 		28th
Sun 		29th
Mon 		30th
Tue 		31st
Wed 		1st
Thu 		2nd
Fri 		3rd
Sat 		4th
Sun 		Total events
July August

Sports

[edit]
Main article: 2002 Commonwealth Games results

There were the maximum of 17 sports included in the schedule for the 2002 Commonwealth Games.

Sport Venue Number of medal events
Aquatics Manchester Aquatics Centre 50
Athletics City of Manchester Stadium (Track and field, Marathon), Salford Quays (race walking) 48
Badminton Bolton Arena 6
Boxing Wythenshawe Forum, Manchester Arena 12
Cycling Manchester Velodrome (track events), Rivington (road races) 17
Gymnastics Manchester Central Convention Complex 15
Hockey Belle Vue Complex 2
Judo Manchester Central Convention Complex 14
Lawn bowls Heaton Park 6
Netball Manchester Arena 1
Rugby Sevens City of Manchester Stadium 1
Shooting Bisley Shooting Centre 40
Squash National Squash Centre 5
Table tennis Table Tennis Centre, Sportcity 8
Triathlon Salford Quays 2
Weightlifting Manchester Central Convention Complex 46
Wrestling Manchester Central Convention Complex 7

After experimenting with it on a smaller scale at the 1994 Commonwealth Games and dropping it at the 1998 Games, disabled competitions were held in swimming, athletics, bowls, table tennis and weightlifting (powerlifting). The medals were added to the final tally for each nation.

Highlights

[edit]
The City of Manchester Stadium during the Games
  • Australian Ian Thorpe set a world record in the 400-metre freestyle swimming.[33]
  • English swimmer Zoë Baker set a world record in the 50-metre breaststroke.[34]
  • English track athlete Paula Radcliffe won her first major gold medal in the 5,000 metres,[35] to record a time of 14:31.42, over 20 seconds ahead of silver medallist Edith Masai of Kenya and 1 minute 21 seconds faster than the inaugural running of the event four years earlier.
  • In the final of the 100 m for men (athletics), the two English favourites (Dwain Chambers & Mark Lewis-Francis) both pulled up with injuries. The race was won by Kim Collins of Saint Kitts and Nevis, winning the country's first Commonwealth title.
  • Simon Whitfield of Canada, the 2000 Olympic champion and the 2008 Olympic silver medallist, won gold in the triathlon.
  • On the last day of track competition, England won gold in both the men's 4×100 and 4×400 relays by tiny margins, recording the same time (38.62) as the Jamaican quartet in sprint relay and holding off a fast finishing Welsh team by 1/100 of a second in the longer race, with a winning time of 3:00.40.
  • The women's 4×400 relay was won by Australia after the favoured Jamaican team dropped the baton.
  • In winning the triple jump England's Jonathan Edwards simultaneously held the World, Olympic, European and Commonwealth championships and the World record. He would lose the European title a week later in Munich.
  • Another world record was set in the 4000-metre team pursuit at the track cycling by the Australian team. Scot Chris Hoy took the individual time trial and 19-year-old Nicole Cooke of Wales won the women's cycling road race.
  • South African swimmer Natalie du Toit created history. As well as winning her events in the newly included disabled swimming event, the 18-year-old, missing the lower section of her left leg, made the final of the 800-metre able-bodied freestyle event in one of a small number of disabled sporting events integrated into the games.
  • In gymnastics England's Beth Tweddle and Kanukai Jackson took gold in the asymmetric bars and all around events respectively. Herodotos Giorgallas also won the first gymnastics gold ever for Cyprus when tying with Scotland's Steve Frew.
  • The host broadcaster of the games was the BBC and the International Broadcast Centre was located at the Manchester College of Arts and Technology.

Medal table

[edit]

  *   Host nation (England)

RankCGAGoldSilverBronzeTotal
1 Australia826263207
2 England*545160165
3 Canada314144116
4 India30221769
5 New Zealand11132145
6 South Africa9201746
7 Cameroon91212
8 Malaysia791834
9 Wales6131231
10 Scotland681630
11 Nigeria531119
12 Kenya48416
13 Jamaica46717
14 Singapore42713
15 Bahamas4048
16 Nauru25815
17 Northern Ireland2215
18 Cyprus2114
19 Pakistan1348
20 Fiji1113
 Zambia1113
22 Zimbabwe1102
23 Namibia1045
24 Tanzania1012
25 Bangladesh1001
 Guyana1001
 Mozambique1001
 Saint Kitts and Nevis1001
29 Botswana0213
30 Uganda0202
31 Samoa0123
32 Trinidad and Tobago0101
33 Barbados0011
 Cayman Islands0011
 Ghana0011
 Lesotho0011
 Malta0011
 Mauritius0011
 Saint Lucia0011
Totals (39 entries)282279334895

Legacy host city and nation

[edit]

In terms of infrastructure, the Games were the catalyst for the widespread redevelopment of the east of the city, an area which had remained derelict since the departure of heavy industry some decades before. The 2002 Commonwealth Games set a new benchmark for hosting the Commonwealth Games and for cities wishing to bid for them with a heavy emphasis on legacy.[36][37]

The venue and financial policy of the 2002 Commonwealth Games has influenced future sporting events, including the 2006 Commonwealth Games in Melbourne, the 2012 Summer Olympics in London and 2014 Commonwealth Games in Glasgow.

In comparison to other sporting events, the 2002 games were marked by financial discipline. The cost of the 2010 Commonwealth Games were estimated at $4.1 billion,[38] the London 2012 Summer Olympics are estimated to cost £9 billion, while the 2014 Commonwealth Games could cost as much as £500 million.[39]

Sporting legacy included the City of Manchester Stadium which was turned over to Manchester City Football Club, to replace the ageing Maine Road. It is possible that this provided an incentive which led to the eventual 2008 take over by the Abu Dhabi United group led by Sheikh Mansour.[citation needed] Consequently, they have seen a considerable upturn in their success, with a series of transfers which has increased the profile of Manchester further, as Manchester City have become title challengers. Indeed, journalists[who?] have stated Mansour would not had bought the city had the club not had the 50,000 stadium. The Manchester Velodrome was built in 1994 in preparation for an Olympic bid, but subsequently hosted the 2002 Commonwealth Games. Since opening in 1994, it has been cited as a catalyst for Britain's successes in track cycling since 2002.[40][41] At the 2008 Olympics in Beijing, the Great British cycling claimed 8 of the 18 gold medals on offer, including 14 of the 54 medals available altogether. This unprecedented achievement was partly attributed[by whom?] to the availability of a velodrome.

Local communities benefited from facilities built for the game such as the Manchester Aquatics Centre, the Northern Regional Tennis Centre and the National Squash Centre. There were comprehensive upgrades of Belle Vue and Moss Side leisure centres serve their local communities.[42]

Olympic president Jacques Rogge said the Games had gone a long way to restoring Britain's credibility in terms of hosting big sporting events.[43] It has since been said that the success of the games was a major factor in reassuring the UK's sporting authorities and the government that the country could successfully stage major successful international sporting events and that, without them, London's successful bid for the 2012 Summer Olympics would not have come about.[44][45] Public houses and restaurants in Manchester reported a threefold increase in takings during the Games, and local tourism board Marketing Manchester estimate some 300,000 more visitors will come to the city each year as a result of its increased profile.[30] It is estimated that by 2008 £600m has been invested in the region as a result of the Games and that about 20,000 jobs had been created.[46]

Marketing

[edit]
[edit]
Manchester 2002 bid logo

The 2002 Commonwealth Games' logo is an image of three figures standing on a podium with their arms uplifted in the jubilation of winning or in celebration, which represents the three core themes of the Games: sport, culture and friendship and the types of medalist in the games: gold, silver and bronze. The figures are captured in three colours which are red, blue and green. The red represents performance, passion and success; the blue symbolises intelligence, confidence and reliability, while the green represents loyalty, balance and generosity. The yellow background behind the figures represents the competitive, powerful and cheerful elements of the Games, while the black games' name letters representing solidarity and strength. The figures in the logo joining hands to resemble the letter 'M', which is the initial for the host city, Manchester and also a crown of the queen to represent the Golden Jubilee of Elizabeth II's reign as the monarch of The United Kingdom. The logo overall represents a celebration of sharing and friendship and the pride of participating in the Games, cheerful atmosphere, sportsmanship and confidence of Manchester as the games host city.[47] The bid logo consisted of the number "22" and the letter "M" making up a smiley face.

Mascot

[edit]

The official mascot of the 2002 Commonwealth Games is a cat named Kit. The adoption of the cat as the games' mascot is to represent the young, vibrant, friendly, dynamic personality of Manchester as the games' host city.[48]

Sponsors

[edit]

Numerous companies ranging from international to local, sponsored the 2002 Games.[49][50] International sponsors included Microsoft and Xerox and also companies with local links to Manchester including Guardian Media Group, PZ Cussons and United Utilities.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

2002 Commonwealth Games

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The 2002 Commonwealth Games, officially the XVII Commonwealth Games and commonly known as Manchester 2002, was an international held in , , from 25 July to 4 August 2002, featuring 281 events across 17 sports with 3,679 athletes from 72 Commonwealth nations competing for medals. Hosted for the first time in since the , the event coincided with Queen Elizabeth II's and marked the largest Commonwealth Games by participating nations, demonstrating the United Kingdom's capacity to stage major international competitions. dominated the medal table with 82 gold medals, followed by with 54 and with 31, while achieved its best-ever performance by securing 30 golds—including gold in women's field hockey after defeating England 3–2 in the final—and entering the top five nations overall. The Games introduced full medal competitions for elite athletes with disabilities in , lawn bowls, , , and , integrating para-sports more comprehensively than prior editions. Despite pre-event funding shortfalls estimated at £20 million that required government intervention and sponsorship drives, the Games proceeded without significant disruptions, earning acclaim for their organization, volunteer efforts, and economic regeneration of East Manchester—a turning point whose impacts are still felt today—which included upgraded venues like the and Aquatics Centre that later supported the city's bid for the . The event's success, bolstered by favorable weather and high attendance, restored confidence in British hosting abilities following earlier setbacks and set a benchmark for future in scale and inclusivity.

Host Selection and Bidding

Selection Process and Competitors

The hosting rights for the 2002 Commonwealth Games were awarded by the Commonwealth Games Federation (CGF) through its General Assembly, typically deciding on bids submitted by national member associations approximately seven years prior to the event. In this instance, the CGF received only one formal bid, from the Commonwealth Games Council for England (CGCE), nominating Manchester as the host city; no other Commonwealth nations submitted competing candidacies. The internal selection process within involved competition among UK cities for the national nomination. Manchester's bid emerged victorious after outcompeting in a CGCE vote held on 2 February 1994, with 17 votes to 's 7. Birmingham had initially pursued the nomination under the leadership of former Sports Minister Denis Howell but withdrew or did not proceed to the final decision stage, leaving Manchester and as the primary contenders. Manchester's proposal leveraged existing urban regeneration plans and facilities originally developed for its unsuccessful bids for the 1996 and , emphasizing cost-effective infrastructure reuse. Lacking international rivals, Manchester's candidacy faced no further scrutiny, and the CGF unanimously confirmed —and specifically —as host on 11 1995 at its General Assembly in . This uncontested award, supported by the government, enabled early planning and secured commitments for venues, transport upgrades, and a backed by national funding. The process highlighted the CGF's preference for bids from established members with demonstrated organizational capacity, as Manchester's selection aligned with England's historical role in originating the Games in 1930.

Manchester's Bid Rationale and Advantages

Manchester's bid for the 2002 Commonwealth Games, awarded on November 2, 1995, emphasized urban regeneration in the deprived East Manchester area as a primary rationale, positioning the event as a catalyst for long-term social and economic revitalization. Drawing from infrastructure plans developed during unsuccessful bids for the and , the proposal repurposed facilities like the and to minimize new construction costs while ensuring world-class standards. This approach addressed post-industrial decline by promising £145 million in sports facilities and attracting £200 million in private investment, alongside the creation of approximately 5,000 jobs. The bid highlighted four key criteria for success: delivering an international sporting event of world status with top-tier facilities and 5,000 athletes from 72 nations; establishing a lasting legacy through inclusive participation, including disabled athletes and 41% female competitors; serving as a catalyst for a national festival aligned with Queen Elizabeth II's ; and achieving commercial viability with targeted revenues from sponsorships and ticketing. Advantages included a compact venue layout, with all sites within 30 minutes of the Athletes' Village, enhancing logistical efficiency compared to more dispersed potential hosts like in the internal English selection process. Strong cross-party government support further bolstered the bid, viewing it as a stepping stone to demonstrate Britain's capacity for major events without the scale of Olympic risks. Internationally, anticipated competition from cities like and dissipated, leaving as the sole bidder, which amplified Manchester's advantages in focused regeneration narratives and proven commitment via prior Olympic preparations over hypothetical rivals. The strategy prioritized tangible outcomes like elite training for sustained sports development, rather than short-term spectacle, aligning with causal drivers of economic multipliers through and branding without overreliance on unproven intangible benefits.

Planning and Preparation

Infrastructure Development

The preparation for the 2002 Commonwealth Games prompted accelerated infrastructure investments in , particularly in the underdeveloped East Manchester area, to support event logistics and long-term . These efforts built on pre-existing regeneration plans but used the Games' timeline as a deadline to expedite projects, including enhancements to road networks and links serving the cluster of venues. Overall for Games-related facilities and supporting totaled approximately £670 million, with a focus on connectivity to handle increased visitor and athlete traffic. Key transport initiatives included advancing several major schemes valued at nearly £800 million, such as improved road access and integration with regional networks to mitigate congestion during the event period from to August 4, 2002. These developments were partly financed through public-private partnerships and aligned with broader goals of integrating East Manchester into the city's economic fabric, drawing inspiration from successful models like Barcelona's Olympic-era transformations. The East Manchester Urban Regeneration Company coordinated efforts, channeling funds like £25 million from the Single Regeneration Budget into neighborhood improvements in Beswick, Clayton, and , which encompassed foundational infrastructure upgrades alongside housing prototypes. These projects not only facilitated the Games' operational needs but also laid groundwork for sustained economic activity, generating around 1,450 jobs in East Manchester between 1999 and 2002 through and related activities. Post-event evaluations noted that the push contributed to a £22 million increase in local company turnover, underscoring the causal link between event-driven deadlines and tangible development outcomes in a post-industrial zone previously marked by dereliction.

Venues and Facilities

The 2002 Commonwealth Games utilized a network of venues across and select outlying areas, with the majority concentrated in the newly developed complex, now known as the . This clustering facilitated efficient logistics for athletes and spectators, leveraging purpose-built infrastructure funded through public-private partnerships aimed at urban regeneration. Facilities included both newly constructed sites and upgraded existing ones, accommodating 17 sports and over 280 events. The flagship venue was the (now known as the Etihad Stadium and home to Manchester City F.C.), a £112 million structure with an initial capacity of 38,000 seats, hosting athletics competitions, , and the opening and closing ceremonies. Designed with a temporary stand for the Games, it featured an international-standard track and was engineered for post-event conversion to football use. Adjacent facilities in included the Manchester Aquatics Centre for swimming, diving, and synchronized swimming; the , part of the National Cycling Centre, for ; and the Regional Athletics Centre for field events and warm-ups. Other key indoor venues comprised the Manchester Evening News Arena, which accommodated gymnastics and netball with its 21,000-seat capacity; Manchester Central Convention Complex for boxing, judo, taekwondo, and weightlifting; and the National Squash Centre for squash competitions. Badminton took place at Bolton Arena, while lawn bowls were held at Heaton Park. Shooting events occurred at the National Shooting Centre in Bisley, Surrey, and road cycling races started from Rivington near Chorley. These selections prioritized accessibility and existing high-quality infrastructure, minimizing new construction costs while ensuring compliance with Commonwealth Games Federation standards for competition and spectator facilities.
VenuePrimary SportsCapacity (seats)Notes
Athletics, , Ceremonies38,000New build; temporary athletics configuration
Manchester Aquatics CentreSwimming, Diving, Synchronized swimming~5,000 (estimated)Purpose-built aquatic facility in
4,500Upgraded national centre
Manchester Evening News Arena, 21,000Existing multi-purpose arena
Post-Games, these venues contributed to sustained sports participation and elite training, with facilities supporting national programs in multiple disciplines.

Athletes' Village Construction

The Athletes' Village for the 2002 Commonwealth Games was located at the University of Manchester's Campus, approximately 3 miles south of central , utilizing the site's existing student residential halls including Owen's Park and other accommodations. These facilities were adapted rather than newly constructed from the ground up, with upgrades focused on enhancing living conditions, security, and amenities to suit over 3,700 athletes and officials from 72 nations. The village was divided into residential and international zones, providing capacity for up to 4,800 occupants, including dining halls, medical services, and recreational areas. Preparations involved fit-out works and enhancements such as improved infrastructure and temporary modifications, completed in advance of the Games' opening on 25 July 2002. These upgrades formed part of a £6 million additional expenditure package that also covered security, transport, and venue preparations, reflecting the event's tight budget constraints and reliance on public funding from Manchester City Council and central government. No major structural construction occurred, distinguishing the village from new-build venues like the City of Manchester Stadium; instead, the approach leveraged underutilized university assets to minimize costs and accelerate readiness. Post-Games, the facilities reverted to student housing without permanent alterations, supporting the event's legacy of efficient resource use amid urban regeneration efforts in east . This model of adaptation, rather than large-scale building, aligned with the bid's emphasis on fiscal prudence, avoiding the overruns seen in other mega-events.

Budget Allocation and Funding Sources

The budget for the 2002 Commonwealth Games in encompassed both capital expenditures for venue development and operational costs for staging the event, with total public funding reaching £288.5 million by the conclusion of the Games. Capital investments, primarily directed toward infrastructure such as the , Manchester Aquatics Centre, and velodrome upgrades, were allocated approximately £146 million, largely drawn from National Lottery funds administered by . Operational expenses, covering event management, ceremonies, security, and athlete support, formed the core running budget, initially estimated at £62 million but revised upward to just under £130 million to account for contingencies including post-9/11 security enhancements. Funding sources were predominantly public, reflecting the event's role in urban regeneration for East Manchester, with limited private sector contributions due to sponsor hesitancy amid economic caution following high-profile project failures like the . The UK government, via the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), provided £40.5 million overall, including an initial £10.5 million grant for opening and closing ceremonies and an additional £25 million in July 2001 as part of a £105 million rescue package to address shortfalls. contributed £83 million, comprising original investments of around £51 million plus £35 million from the same 2001 package, effectively underwriting potential deficits. , utilizing National Lottery proceeds, supplied £165 million, focused on capital projects with £135 million earmarked for venues and an extra £20 million for operations. A £25 million , accessible only by unanimous agreement among stakeholders, buffered against revenue gaps, while the allocated £3 million specifically for police security.
Funding SourceAmount (£ million)Primary Allocation
83Operational and contingency support
National Lottery (Sport England)165Venue capital and operational
UK Government (DCMS)40.5Ceremonies, general operations
(Security)3Policing and event security
Total Public Funding288.5
Revenue streams were projected to offset portions of the operational but fell short of targets, with sponsorship and television rights aiming for £55 million yet securing only around £18 million by mid-2001 from six corporate partners and the . Ticket sales were forecasted at £5 million, and merchandising/licensing at £2 million, though actual figures remained commercially sensitive. This sponsorship deficit of approximately £20 million necessitated greater reliance on public underwriting, highlighting challenges in commercializing the event despite its scale.

Queen's Baton Relay

The , a ceremonial precursor to the 2002 Commonwealth Games held in , began on 11 March 2002 at in , where Queen Elizabeth II entrusted the baton—containing her message as to the athletes—with the first relay participants. This edition, aligned with the celebrations, marked the first Baton Relay to circumnavigate the globe, emphasizing the Commonwealth's unity and the Games' international scope. The international phase spanned 23 Commonwealth nations and territories, traversing approximately 63,000 miles (101,000 km) over 87 days before the baton's return to Britain on 6 June 2002. Routes included segments across , , , the , and , with the baton handed among local runners, dignitaries, and athletes to symbolize global participation; for instance, it passed through early in the journey as part of broader African stops. Upon repatriation, the UK leg unfolded over 50 days, covering more than 5,000 miles through over 500 towns and villages across , , , , the Isle of Man, and , involving 5,000 volunteer runners selected from communities to highlight local contributions to the Games. Celebratory events accompanied the relay, featuring performances, community festivals, and notable carriers such as cyclist and broadcaster , fostering public engagement and Jubilee spirit. The relay concluded at the Games' opening ceremony on 25 July 2002 in Manchester, where the baton was delivered to Queen Elizabeth II by Manchester United footballer David Beckham and 11-year-old Kirsty Howard, a terminally ill child chosen for the final leg, before the Queen read her inscribed message aloud. This handover underscored the relay's themes of inspiration and resilience, with the event broadcast to amplify its symbolic role in uniting Commonwealth participants.

Cultural and Festival Programs

The cultural and festival programs accompanying the 2002 Commonwealth Games were organized under the Cultureshock initiative, integrated into the Spirit of Friendship Festival to promote arts, community engagement, and Commonwealth connections across . Cultureshock comprised 11 distinct projects managed by in collaboration with the Foreign & Commonwealth Office, with objectives centered on leveraging arts for social inclusion, evaluating program design and management, and measuring impacts on audiences, investors, and local arts organizations. These programs ran parallel to the Games from late July through early August 2002, featuring free public events to broaden access and foster regional participation. A component was Festival Live, which delivered diverse entertainment including performances and activities in daily from 25 to 4 August 2002. Additional events highlighted international and artistic dimensions, such as the Shisha Sri Lanka exhibition at the Art Gallery from 8 to 14 September 2002, showcasing sculptures and textiles by eight n artists to emphasize Commonwealth artistic exchanges. Community-focused spectacles included Waterfire on 11 August 2002 at Manchester's Piccadilly Canal Basin, incorporating Commonwealth-themed performances and concluding with fireworks, with an expected attendance of 6,000. The initiative's evaluation, conducted via two research strands—one assessing management, community relations, and design effectiveness, the other gauging immediate outcomes and potential legacies—identified key benefits and challenges in regional cultural programming while offering frameworks for integrating arts with major sporting events. This marked the inaugural comprehensive evaluation of a Commonwealth Games cultural program, influencing subsequent editions by stressing sustainable international partnerships and research-driven planning.

Marketing and Branding

Logo and Visual Identity

The logo for the 2002 Commonwealth Games, titled the "Spirit of Friendship" emblem, served as the central element of the event's visual identity. It represented the core themes of the Games, emphasizing unity and collaboration among participating nations. The design was originally created by the agency Race, formerly known as , and subsequently redesigned by Access Marketing & Design prior to the event. This emblem was prominently featured across promotional materials, venues, medals, and merchandise, reinforcing the Games' motto of "The Spirit of Friendship." The visual branding extended to the associated cultural festival, where variants of the were used to integrate sporting and community elements. Medals incorporated the on one side alongside the Commonwealth Games Federation insignia, weighing approximately 140 grams for gold variants.

Mascot Design and Role

The mascot for the 2002 Commonwealth Games in was Kit, an anthropomorphic cat, designed to capture the energetic and youthful essence of the host city. Kit was characterized as young, vibrant, friendly, dynamic, slightly mischievous, and full of fun, aligning with 's cultural identity. Accompanying Kit was a sidekick named Mad Ferret, whose design drew inspiration from the city's influential scene, evoking the bold attitudes of local bands such as Oasis and . In their role, Kit and Mad Ferret served as promotional ambassadors, appearing in campaigns, merchandise, and public engagements to build excitement for the Games held from July 25 to August 4, 2002. They entertained spectators during the on July 25, participating in performances that highlighted the event's festive atmosphere. The duo also featured in branded items, such as keyrings depicting Kit engaged in sports like hockey, reinforcing the Games' emphasis on athletic participation and community involvement. Their presence extended to interactions that bridged the Commonwealth's diverse nations, fostering a sense of unity and playfulness amid the competitions.

Sponsorship Deals and Commercial Partnerships

The sponsorship deals for the 2002 Commonwealth Games in were designed to generate revenue to offset the event's costs, which totaled approximately £332 million, with public funding from the government and covering about 55% or £183 million. Organizers initially targeted £62 million in commercial income, including sponsorships, but faced early shortfalls, raising only £18 million from sponsorship and overseas television rights by September 2001, prompting concerns over a potential £20-30 million deficit. Despite these challenges, the program ultimately delivered around £56 million in commercial revenue, including sponsorships and ticketing, marking double the amount raised by any prior and contributing to the event's financial success. Key sponsors included , which committed a multi-million-pound deal to support the —carried by 5,000 participants across the and —and broader event promotion, leveraging its confectionery brands for visibility. served as the exclusive software sponsor, providing £3 million in cash and services to equip venues and operations with its technology, enhancing the Games' digital infrastructure. Other notable partners encompassed as the "Gateway to the Games," handling transport logistics; for media support; with a £2 million contribution tied to retail promotions; and providers like Cussons, for equipment, and Atlantic for communications. Legal firm Addleshaw Booth & Co entered one of the largest sponsorships by a commercial law practice, focusing on advisory and branding integration. These partnerships extended beyond cash contributions to in-kind support, such as software, promotional products via 4imprint, and logistical services, which helped distinguish monetary from non-monetary income in official accounts as recommended by ary oversight. The deals emphasized targeted activations, like Cadbury's relay branding and Microsoft's venue tech, to maximize sponsor exposure amid a competitive market where initial sponsor hesitancy reflected perceived undervaluation of the compared to larger events like the Olympics. Overall, the sponsorship framework demonstrated effective private-public collaboration, enabling the to exceed revenue expectations despite early fiscal pressures.

Event Execution

Participating Nations and Athlete Numbers

The 2002 Commonwealth Games in Manchester attracted competitors from 72 nations and territories of the , establishing a record for the highest number of participating entities in the event's history up to that point. These participants represented all regions of the , spanning , , the , , and . A total of 3,679 athletes took part in the competitions across 14 individual sports and three team sports, including , , and hockey. The Games also integrated elite athletes with disabilities (EAD) in select disciplines such as , lawn bowls, swimming, , and , enhancing inclusivity within the multi-sport framework. This broad participation underscored the event's role in fostering international sporting exchange among members.

Sports Disciplines and Program Expansion

The 2002 Commonwealth Games featured competitions across 17 sports disciplines, encompassing 281 events in total, marking the largest program in the history of the Games up to that point. These included aquatics (diving, swimming, and synchronized swimming), athletics, badminton, boxing, cycling (track, road, and mountain bike), gymnastics (artistic and rhythmic), field hockey, judo, lawn bowls, netball, rugby sevens, shooting, squash, table tennis, triathlon, weightlifting, and wrestling. The program emphasized a mix of individual and team events, with 14 individual sports and 3 team sports, attracting over 5,000 athletes and officials from 72 nations and territories. A significant expansion was the full integration of para-sports into the main competition schedule for the first time, with disabled athletes competing as full members of national teams and their medals contributing to the overall medal table. This included 10 para-events across athletics (e.g., 100m blind men, 800m wheelchair women) and aquatics (e.g., 50m backstroke intellectually impaired). The initiative represented a shift from segregated demonstration events in prior Games, such as those trialed in 1994 and 1998, to mainstream inclusion, setting a precedent for future editions. The broader program growth built on incremental increases from previous hosts, with Manchester's edition expanding to a record 17 sports compared to fewer in earlier Games like 1998, reflecting efforts to broaden participation while leveraging new venues for disciplines like , which debuted as a full sport. This structure prioritized accessibility and diversity, though it required careful venue adaptations to accommodate both able-bodied and para-athletes without separate facilities.

Competition Calendar

The 2002 Commonwealth Games featured competitions spanning 25 July to 4 August 2002, with 281 events across 17 sports involving 3,679 athletes from 72 nations. The schedule was structured to distribute events over 11 days, prioritizing spectator access and venue efficiency, with preliminary heats early and finals later to sustain engagement. Some sports, such as , commenced preliminaries on the opening day, while core competitions intensified from 26 July onward. The occurred on 25 July at the , signaling the start without major medal events that day. Competitions proper began on 26 July (Day 1), including team heats at , diving heats, and synchronised swimming preliminaries at Manchester Aquatics Centre. opened the same day at the , encompassing track events, field competitions, and culminating in marathons on 28 July (Day 3), with the women's race at 08:00 and men's at 08:30. Mid-games days (29 July to 1 August) hosted peak action, including finals, at the , , , and team sports like and hockey. Events such as , , squash, and concluded by early August, with wrestling and remaining finals on 2–3 August (Days 8–9). The closing ceremony on 4 August marked the end, following final presentations. This timeline reflected the games' expansion to include disability events with full accreditation in sports like and swimming, integrated alongside able-bodied programs.

Opening Ceremony Details

The opening ceremony of the 2002 Commonwealth Games took place on 25 July 2002 at the , marking the official start of the event in , . Queen Elizabeth II declared the Games open during her year, addressing athletes from over 70 nations and territories gathered in the stadium, which highlighted Manchester's sporting tradition. The ceremony featured a £12 million production with a cast of 4,000 performers, combining large-scale spectacles, music, and symbolic displays directed by Nigel Jamieson. Key elements included Sir Steve Redgrave initiating proceedings by beating a ceremonial drum, followed by performances blending pomp and contemporary pop music before a capacity crowd of 38,000 spectators. A choreographed display formed a "river of light" symbolizing common humanity, accompanied by a specially commissioned soundtrack composed by Dave Stewart. The athletes' parade showcased delegations from 72 participating nations entering in a blaze of flags and color, with Australian swimmer Ian Thorpe carrying his country's flag. The event concluded with the traditional elements of the handover and the cauldron lighting, setting the tone for the 11-day competition that drew thousands of athletes and officials. Overall, the ceremony was praised for its spectacle and successful execution, contributing to the Games' reputation as the largest held in at the time.

Closing Ceremony and Handover

The closing ceremony of the 2002 Commonwealth Games occurred on August 4, 2002, at the City of Manchester Stadium, concluding 11 days of competition before a sell-out crowd of 38,000 spectators despite persistent heavy rain that drenched the event. Queen Elizabeth II presided over the proceedings, formally declaring the Games closed in a speech that highlighted their success as a climax to her Golden Jubilee year. The ceremony featured musical performances by artists including Will Young, Dave Stewart, Heather Small, and UB40, alongside a vignette involving actors from the British soap opera Coronation Street. Swimmer Karen Pickering carried the flag for England during the athletes' parade. A key element was the handover to the next host city, with Manchester organizers symbolically passing the Commonwealth Games flag to representatives from Melbourne, Australia, which would host the 2006 edition. This segment included a large-scale presentation coordinated by the arts organization Walk the Plank, featuring over 1,700 lanterns forming luminous displays such as a glowing human figure and a "sea of lanterns" to evoke celebration and transition. The event underscored the Games' theme of collective achievement, involving more than 50 artists in its production over eight weeks. BBC1's television coverage peaked at nearly 10 million viewers, reflecting strong public interest in the finale.

Competitive Outcomes

Medal Table and National Performances

topped the medal table at the 2002 Commonwealth Games, securing 82 gold medals out of 282 awarded overall, demonstrating dominance particularly in (where it won 31 golds), , and . Host nation achieved its best-ever Games performance with 54 golds, surpassing previous records through strong showings in , , and , for a total of 165 medals. The following table summarizes the medal standings for the top ten nations, ranked by gold medals, then silver, then bronze:
RankNationGoldSilverBronzeTotal
1826263207
2545160165
3314144116
430221769
511132145
69201746
791212
8791834
96131231
10681630
Canada placed third overall with 31 golds, bolstered by successes in wrestling, , and , though trailing the top two in total medals. India's fourth-place finish marked its strongest showing to date, with 30 golds driven by 14 in —a discipline where targeted training investments yielded outsized returns—and breakthroughs in and wrestling, including the nation's first boxing gold via Md. Ali Qamar in the category. Cameroon achieved a notable overperformance relative to its delegation size, earning 9 golds primarily from (6) and wrestling, highlighting the impact of focused combat sports preparation amid limited resources. Smaller teams like and punched above their weight in niche events such as and , contributing to the Games' competitive depth across 72 participating nations.

Notable Achievements and Records

Australian swimmer dominated the men's freestyle events, winning gold medals in the 200 m, 400 m, and 800 m while setting world records in each: 1:44.66 in the 200 m, 3:40.08 in the 400 m, and 7:39.16 in the 800 m. He also contributed to Australia's victories in multiple relays, securing a total of six gold medals. English swimmer Zoe Baker broke the in the women's 50 m semi-final on July 30, 2002, with a time of 30.57 seconds, surpassing the previous mark held by South Africa's . She followed with in the final at 30.60 seconds. In the women's 200 m freestyle, England's Karen Pickering established a Commonwealth Games record of 1:59.69 en route to on July 31, 2002. In para-swimming, Australian Ben Austin set four world records across the multi-disability 50 m and 100 m freestyle events, earning gold in both. In athletics, England's claimed gold in the women's 5,000 m on , 2002, shattering the Commonwealth Games record with 14:31.43, which also marked a British national record and the fastest time worldwide that year. Bahamian sprinter Debbie Ferguson won the women's 200 m in 22.20 seconds on July 29, 2002, erasing the previous record of 22.25 set by Australia's in 1994 and posting the season's fastest global time.

Integration of Para-Athletes

The 2002 Commonwealth Games in represented a pioneering step in the integration of elite athletes with disabilities into a major international , with para-sports events fully embedded in the main competition schedule rather than as separate or demonstration activities. This approach allowed such athletes to compete as integral members of their national teams, with results contributing directly to the overall medal tallies, marking the first instance of such comprehensive inclusion in the Games' . Prior efforts, including standalone Commonwealth Paraplegic Games since 1962, had operated in parallel but segregated formats; Manchester's model shifted toward unified participation to foster broader equity in competition structures. The program featured ten medal events across five sports: , lawn bowls, , , and , surpassing the Commonwealth Games Committee's requirement for a minimum of two full-medal events. Specific events included the women's 800 m race and men's 100 m blind in , the women's 50 m multi- in , and corresponding classified competitions in the other disciplines, ensuring competition aligned with standards for impairment-based classification to maintain fairness. Approximately 20 countries fielded para-athletes, integrating them into the same venues and logistics as able-bodied competitors, such as the Manchester Aquatics Centre for and the City of Manchester Stadium for . This integration yielded measurable outcomes, with nations like Australia and England securing golds in events such as powerlifting and lawn bowls, demonstrating competitive viability and contributing to host England’s strong performance. The format established a template for subsequent Games, emphasizing shared facilities and unified team representation over isolation, though it highlighted logistical demands like specialized equipment and classification processes that required precise coordination to avoid disruptions. Empirical evidence from the events underscored the feasibility of inclusion without diluting event integrity, as records were set in disability athletics categories alongside able-bodied competitions.

Reception and Immediate Impact

Attendance Figures and Public Engagement

The 2002 Commonwealth Games in attracted an estimated one million live spectators, according to reports from the event's official sources, reflecting strong public interest across the 17 sports disciplines held over 11 days from July 25 to August 4. This figure encompasses ticketed attendees at venues such as the , which hosted athletics and the opening ceremony with capacities reaching 38,000 and multiple daily session turnovers. Organizers offered approximately 750,000 tickets, with over 600,000 sold by mid-Games period, and many sessions achieving sell-outs due to affordable pricing averaging around £10 per ticket, which broadened access beyond elite audiences to include families and local residents. Public engagement was further evidenced by a 9.5% rise in overall visitor numbers to , reaching 84.4 million in 2002 compared to 77.1 million in 1999, with the Games contributing to heightened and local participation through associated cultural programs and volunteer initiatives. Surveys of 1,196 attendees highlighted diverse visitor profiles, including significant proportions of first-time international travelers and repeat domestic spectators motivated by national team support and event novelty, underscoring effective that emphasized and involvement. Commercial revenues from ticketing exceeded projections by £4 million, indicating robust demand and minimal underutilization of facilities despite pre-event concerns over capacity. These attendance levels and engagement metrics positioned the Manchester Games as a benchmark for non-Olympic multi-sport events, with post-event analyses attributing success to strategic , venue proximity within the , and integration of free public viewing zones that amplified broader civic participation without diluting core spectator revenues.

Media Coverage and Broadcasting

The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) served as the host broadcaster and held the exclusive UK television rights for the 2002 Commonwealth Games, providing comprehensive coverage across television, radio, and online platforms. This included live broadcasts of key events, interactive digital services for multi-feed viewing, and dedicated programming from venues in . The BBC also operated a temporary radio station, BBC 2002, exclusively for audiences during the event period from July 25 to August 4. Viewership in the UK reached significant peaks, with the opening ceremony on July 25 attracting 8.3 million viewers to BBC1, building to a peak audience of nearly 9 million. The closing ceremony on August 4 drew almost 10 million viewers, marking a strong conclusion to the 's coverage, which organizers described as a major success with audiences consistently in the millions across the 11-day event. The invested approximately £20 million in these rights and production efforts. Internationally, broadcasting rights were sold to networks including Channel 7 in and TV New Zealand for and Pacific regions, enabling coverage tailored to those audiences. Cumulative global television viewership exceeded one billion, reflecting broad reach across nations, though specific figures for individual markets remain less documented than UK metrics. Print and local media, such as the , supplemented broadcasts by producing official event records and daily reporting, contributing to overall publicity.

Security and Operational Challenges

The 2002 Commonwealth Games in were conducted under stringent protocols, influenced by the city's 1996 IRA bombing that damaged infrastructure without casualties but heightened vulnerability perceptions. deployed extensive resources, including aerial surveillance via fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters, to monitor venues and mitigate potential terrorist threats during the event from July 25 to August 4. The , 2001, attacks in the United States amplified global event standards, prompting organizers to enhance crowd management and access controls, transforming operational planning for major gatherings. Despite these preparations, no significant security incidents occurred, with post-event assessments crediting integrated efforts by Manchester 2002 organizers and local authorities for averting disruptions. Operationally, the Games organization grappled with financial constraints, including a reported £20 million funding deficit stemming from insufficient sponsorship revenues, which threatened viability and required contingency discussions for municipal or national government intervention. Pre-event audits by parliamentary committees highlighted challenges in streamlining the operational team to handle for 17 s across multiple venues, such as coordinating athlete transport and facility readiness amid tight timelines. These issues were compounded by broader pressures, yet the multi-venue format—spanning sites like the and Manchester Aquatics Centre—ultimately functioned without major logistical failures, as evidenced by the successful hosting of over 3,500 athletes from 72 nations. Government-backed lottery funding adjustments helped stabilize operations, averting collapse risks noted in contemporary analyses.

Economic Evaluation

Total Costs and Any Overruns

The operational budget for the 2002 Commonwealth Games was supported by substantial public funding totaling £288.5 million, comprising £83 million from , £165 million from the National Lottery via , and additional contributions from national government sources. This funding package, finalized in 2001, addressed earlier shortfalls including a projected £20 million deficit attributed to slower-than-expected sponsorship commitments. Overall hosting expenditures, encompassing operations, venues, and related infrastructure upgrades, reached approximately £330 million. Despite pre-event apprehensions over potential deficits—stemming from the city's initial commitment rising from £35 million to £80 million for direct operational support—the Games concluded without material cost overruns. Organizers reported success in containing expenditures while generating surplus revenues through robust ticket sales and sponsorship deals, which offset risks and yielded financial benefits for stakeholders. This outcome contrasted with concerns raised in parliamentary scrutiny, where the reliance on public funds was noted but ultimately validated by the event's fiscal discipline.

Direct Economic Injections and Job Creation

The hosting of the 2002 Commonwealth Games in involved direct investments exceeding £670 million at 2002 prices, encompassing construction of new venues such as the and Manchester Aquatics Centre, alongside upgrades to existing facilities and transport infrastructure. This figure represented net additional spending of approximately £320 million after accounting for baseline commitments, with contributions including £120 million from for sports facilities and £125 million for enhanced transport links. Operational injections during the event period included £29 million in expenditure from visitors and athletes, supplemented by £25 million in sponsorship revenues (£15 million in cash and £11 million in kind). These funds directly stimulated local suppliers, contractors, and service providers, with an associated £22 million increase in business turnover for Manchester firms. Direct job creation from Games-related activities was estimated at 6,300 positions across preparation, execution, and immediate aftermath phases, according to analysis by Policy Consultants. Pre-Games and work generated around 2,050 jobs, primarily in building and sectors, while the event itself supported 250 temporary roles in operations, security, and hospitality. In East , where most venues were concentrated, 1,450 new jobs emerged between 1999 and 2002, with initiatives ensuring that 30% of positions were filled by local residents to maximize immediate benefits. These figures encompassed both direct payroll positions and indirect roles in supply chains, though estimates varied slightly across evaluations, with some attributing 2,800 additional direct and indirect jobs specifically to 's economy. Overall, the injections fostered short-term labor demand without evidence of significant displacement in other sectors.

Broader Multiplier Effects and ROI Analysis

The 2002 Commonwealth Games in produced broader multiplier effects through induced economic activity, including employee wages recirculated into local consumption and stimulated investments in and commercial developments. These effects amplified initial direct injections from visitor spending—estimated at over £100 million during the event period—and operational costs, leading to secondary rounds of expenditure in sectors such as , retail, and . Economic modeling, for leakage, displacement, and additionality, attributed a total (GVA) of £1.1 billion (in 2018 prices) to the Games from 1995 to 2012, with GDP boosts ranging from £0.8 billion to £1.2 billion over the same timeframe. Return on investment analyses, drawing on input-output and models, indicated a positive outcome relative to public expenditures. With £344 million in targeted (excluding broader regeneration funding), the Games generated a 3.2-fold return in GVA, surpassing comparable events like Melbourne 2006 (ROI 1.7) and Glasgow 2014 (ROI 1.8). Pre-event projections by Cambridge Policy Consultants similarly forecasted net benefits exceeding costs, incorporating business turnover gains of £22 million and 6,300 new jobs in the Manchester area from event-related and legacy initiatives. Employment multipliers were evident in the creation of 23,000 (FTE) job-years across construction, operations, and post-Games commercial uses of facilities like , which supported 3,800 additional roles through retail and office developments. Overall, 2,900 jobs were created or safeguarded citywide, with 2,000 concentrated in East Manchester, reflecting localized ripple effects from improved transport links and business confidence. While these figures derive from official evaluations using data and economic simulations, they may overstate attribution due to concurrent urban policies, though causal links to Games-specific catalysts—such as accelerated private pledges totaling £400 million by 2017—are supported by temporal correlations in flows.

Legacy and Long-term Effects

Urban Regeneration in East Manchester

East Manchester, encompassing areas like Beswick, Clayton, and , suffered from severe post-industrial decline prior to the 2002 Commonwealth Games, characterized by high deprivation and rates exceeding 14%. The Games served as a catalyst for regeneration, with organizers integrating event infrastructure into a broader strategy managed by New East Manchester Ltd., a public-private established to coordinate efforts. Central to this was the development of , a 200-acre site transformed from contaminated into a hub of world-class sports facilities, including the , Aquatics Centre, and , supported by £670 million in capital investments for venues, transport, and infrastructure. The athletes' village was repurposed into residential housing, complemented by £25 million in Single Regeneration Budget funding for neighborhood renewal projects. Additional commercial developments, such as a regional retail center, four-star , and offices, were planned to support up to 3,800 jobs. The Legacy Programme, funded with £17.7 million from 1999 to 2004, emphasized sustainable outcomes through initiatives like skills training and community health projects, resulting in 1,450 new jobs created in East Manchester between 1999 and 2002, alongside training for 3,092 individuals. in the area declined sharply to 5.7% during the Games period, reflecting accelerated economic activity. Broader impacts included 6,300 jobs from related business parks and a £22 million increase in local company turnover. Long-term effects integrated Games-driven improvements into Manchester's ongoing redevelopment, enhancing the area's infrastructure and attractiveness for investment, though sustained success depended on continued public-private coordination beyond the event. The relocation of Manchester City Football Club to the further boosted economic vitality, contributing to a "remarkable regeneration" as noted by former council leader Sir Howard Bernstein.

Sports Participation and Infrastructure Utilization

The infrastructure developed for the 2002 Commonwealth Games in , particularly the complex in East , has seen extensive post-event utilization, serving elite athletes, professional sports teams, and community users. The , constructed at a cost of £112 million with a capacity of 48,000, was repurposed in 2003 as the home ground for Manchester City Football Club, now known as the Etihad Stadium, and has hosted major events including the , matches, bouts, and concerts. Similarly, the National Cycling Centre, costing £9.5 million and accommodating 3,500 spectators, functions as the headquarters for , facilitating training programs that underpinned the organization's dominance in , including multiple Olympic gold medals following the establishment of the Olympic Development Programme there in 2003. Other venues have maintained roles in both competitive and recreational sports. The Manchester Aquatics Centre, built for £32 million with space for 2,500, continues to host national and international and diving competitions, serves as the base for British Paralympic swimming teams, and provides public access to its Olympic-standard pools for local training and leisure. The Regional Athletics Arena, developed at £3.5 million for 6,000 capacity, supports elite events such as the AAA National Trials and the Paralympic World Cup since 2005, alongside community athletics programs. Facilities like the National Squash Centre, hosting British championships since 2003, and the Arena, a regional hub with public sports offerings, exemplify sustained operational viability, with many sites integrating commercial events to ensure financial sustainability. Regarding sports participation, the Games' legacy initiatives, including the Manchester 2002 Legacy Programme, sought to elevate grassroots engagement through enhanced facility access and community outreach, yet empirical outcomes reveal mixed results. Independent reviews indicate conflicting evidence: one analysis reported a post-Games decrease in overall participation levels, while another documented modest increases, particularly in targeted East Manchester demographics via school and club programs. Elite-level advancements, such as British Cycling's utilization of the —spurred by the Games' —have indirectly inspired recreational uptake, but broader national trends show limited causal links to sustained mass participation gains. Local reports attribute some community-level rises, like expanded access to and , to the enduring venue presence, though without uniform quantifiable surges across sports. This underscores a where infrastructure legacies bolster high-performance pathways more reliably than diffuse recreational booms.

Social and Cultural Impacts

The cultural programme for the 2002 Commonwealth Games, titled Cultureshock, aimed to celebrate the of the participating nations while integrating Manchester's own multicultural communities. This initiative focused on educational and community-based activities to renegotiate perceptions of the , moving beyond its colonial associations toward a of contemporary diversity and inclusion. By strengthening partnerships with ethnically diverse local cultural organizations, Cultureshock enhanced community representation and fostered cultural dialogue, setting a precedent for evaluating cultural programmes in subsequent . Socially, the Games promoted inclusion by becoming the first to fully integrate para-athletes into national teams, with 110 para-athletes competing across 10 sports alongside able-bodied competitors. This integration advanced visibility and participation for disabled individuals in elite sport, contributing to broader societal shifts toward accessibility. was bolstered through extensive efforts, which built and sustained local involvement in cultural and sporting activities post-event. The event's legacy programme emphasized and community-led infrastructure development, supporting initiatives that addressed local social needs such as employment and cohesion in east . Participation from 72 nations and territories underscored multicultural exchange, with baseline research indicating potential positive impacts on ethnic minority groups through targeted sports and volunteer programmes. These efforts collectively elevated 's profile as an inclusive urban center, though long-term social outcomes varied by community.

Criticisms of Displacement and Unequal Benefits

Critics of the urban regeneration efforts tied to the 2002 Commonwealth Games in Manchester's East End argued that the initiatives, while aimed at revitalizing deprived areas, contributed to indirect displacement of long-term residents through escalating property values and neighborhood transformations that eroded cohesion. Although direct forced evictions were not widespread—academic analyses noted a lack of evidence for mass working-class displacement akin to traditional models—the influx of investment and new housing developments, such as the conversion of the athletes' village into private residences, raised concerns about affordability pressures pushing lower-income households outward. Residents reported feeling alienated in their own , with one local describing regeneration promises as unfulfilled hype that prioritized city-wide economic gains over immediate local needs, leading to a of dislocation despite physical retention in the area. Unequal benefits were highlighted in critiques focusing on how economic gains disproportionately favored external investors, developers, and higher-income newcomers rather than original East Manchester inhabitants. Between 1999 and 2002, approximately 1,450 new jobs were created in the area hosting key venues, yet observers contended these opportunities often bypassed entrenched unemployed or low-skilled locals in favor of transient or skilled positions linked to broader city branding efforts. Local amenities suffered as well; for instance, the arrival of large retailers like led to the closure of independent shops, reducing accessible community services and exacerbating feelings of exclusion among remaining residents who perceived the changes as capital-driven rather than resident-centered. Academic critiques, such as those examining state-led regeneration, attributed this disparity to a top-down approach that stigmatized East Manchester's pre-Games character while channeling benefits toward entrepreneurial , sidelining low-income groups in processes. Further discontent arose from the perceived mismatch between touted legacies—like improved infrastructure and tourism revenue exceeding £2 billion regionally—and tangible improvements for disadvantaged populations, with some residents viewing event-themed enhancements (e.g., superficial aesthetic upgrades) as disconnected from everyday realities in neighborhoods like Openshaw. While official evaluations emphasized job creation and reduced unemployment from 14.2% to 5.7% in New East Manchester during the Games period, detractors argued these metrics masked persistent inequalities, including inadequate affordable housing protections and a failure to prevent the erosion of social ties in redeveloped zones like Ancoats. Such views, drawn from resident testimonies and scholarly analyses, underscore a causal chain where event-driven investment catalyzed physical renewal but often at the expense of equitable social outcomes for the area's most vulnerable.

References

  1. https://www.commonwealthsport.com/commonwealth-games/manchester-2002
  2. https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/5289/2002-manchester
  3. https://teamengland.org/commonwealth-games-history/manchester-2002
  4. https://www.topendsports.com/events/commonwealth-games/medals/table-2002.htm
  5. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-62267343
  6. https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1124821/manchester-2002
  7. https://www.scmp.com/article/61785/manchester-games-bid-blocks
  8. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmcumeds/124/9031502.htm
  9. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200001/cmselect/cmcumeds/286/1032006.htm
  10. https://www.mancity.com/news/club/celebrating-the-20th-anniversary-of-2002-commonwealth-games-63794344
  11. https://mcractive.com/news/common-wealth-games-a-true-legacy/
  12. https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/download/fcd55f7f04c6ab247996a14fc03b9b81373a486e043a4cd37abc2336b717df00/275489/Smith_Fox_2007_final_author.pdf
  13. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmselect/cmcumeds/173-i/2121103.htm
  14. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-18983577
  15. https://www.mancity.com/etihad-stadium
  16. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/manchester-commonwealth-games-2002-legacy-7423361
  17. https://internationalbroadcasts.fandom.com/wiki/2002_Commonwealth_Games
  18. https://www.bbc.co.uk/manchester/2002/news/072002/12/village.shtml
  19. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmselect/cmcumeds/173-i/2121102.htm
  20. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2002/jul/26/commonwealthgames2002.commonwealthgames7
  21. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/picture-special-ten-years-on-from-the-commonwealth-689596
  22. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmcumeds/842/84205.htm
  23. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/special_events/commonwealth_games_2002/2151192.stm
  24. https://www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/news/7347898.extra-baton-for-queens-relay/
  25. https://www.topendsports.com/events/commonwealth-games/baton-relay.htm
  26. https://sportinglandmarks.co.uk/about/
  27. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-27635969
  28. https://www.insidethegames.biz/timelines/44
  29. https://allafrica.com/stories/200203130817.html
  30. https://www.modernghana.com/news/110802/the-queens-baton-begins-its-journey-on-march-11.html
  31. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/world-news/queens-relay-will-be-50-day-street-1160465
  32. https://www.bbc.co.uk/manchester/2002/baton/ukdiary/index.shtml
  33. https://www.beatrizgarcia.net/projects-newer/2003-cultureshock/
  34. https://citiesofcultureobservatory.wordpress.com/2020/02/13/cultureshock-manchester-2002-commonwealth-games-cultural-programme-evaluation/
  35. https://www.bbc.co.uk/manchester/2002/festival/events.shtml
  36. https://www.designweek.co.uk/issues/25-july-2002/design-in-a-sporting-role/
  37. https://www.mondaq.com/uk/licensing-syndication/15290/getting-into-the-spirit-the-manchester-2002-commonwealth-games-licensing-programme
  38. https://www.bbc.co.uk/manchester/2002/news/072002/18/medals.shtml
  39. https://collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/objects/co8413157/2002-manchester-commonwealth-games-collection
  40. https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1104979/manchester-2002-kit
  41. https://www.commonwealthsport.com/news/4322805/mascots-at-the-commonwealth-games
  42. https://www.birmingham2022.com/news/2479039/history-of-commonwealth-games-mascots
  43. https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/mascots-mad-ferret-during-the-2002-manchester-commonwealth-news-photo/51530053
  44. https://www.teamscotland.scot/games/past-games/manchester-2002/
  45. https://www.citymonitor.ai/analysis/commonwealth-games-cost-government/
  46. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/story/0%2C3604%2C403400%2C00.html
  47. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/athletics/2994157/Commonwealth-Games-30m-black-hole-as-Manchester-fail-to-sell-rights.html
  48. https://www.sportbusiness.com/news/2002-commonwealth-games-receives-funding-boost/
  49. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2003/aug/02/commonwealthgames2002.commonwealthgames
  50. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2002/sep/28/communities.uknews
  51. https://www.sportbusiness.com/news/cadbury-signs-sponsorship-deal-with-commonwealth-games-2002/
  52. https://www.sportcal.com/pressreleases/cadbury-to-sponsor-manchester-2002-commonwealth-games/
  53. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2001/apr/02/marketingandpr2
  54. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2001/apr/03/athletics.duncanmackay
  55. https://www.bbc.co.uk/manchester/2002/who/sponsors.shtml
  56. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/asdas-2m-boost-for-2002-games-1190037
  57. https://www.investegate.co.uk/index.php/announcement/rns/4imprint-group--four/commonwealth-games-2002-/352672
  58. https://www.sportcal.com/pressreleases/addleshaw-booth-co-breaks-new-ground-with-2002-commonwealth-games-sponsorship/
  59. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200001/cmselect/cmcumeds/286/28608.htm
  60. https://www.marketingweek.com/manchester-games-signs-up-cadbury/
  61. https://www.marketingweek.com/sponsors-to-benefit-from-undervalued-commonwealth-games/
  62. https://www.topendsports.com/events/commonwealth-games/hosts/manchester.htm
  63. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmcumeds/124/12408.htm
  64. https://www.commonwealthsport.com/about/para-sports
  65. https://www.paralympic.org.au/2022/07/integrated-commonwealth-games-a-nod-to-para-sport-pioneers/
  66. https://www.cbc.ca/sports/the-road-to-the-inclusive-games-1.329118
  67. https://theconversation.com/integration-not-segregation-para-sports-at-the-glasgow-games-29589
  68. https://commonwealthgames.com.au/para-at-the-commonwealth-games/
  69. https://sportscotland.org.uk/media/s4zpwmub/an-analysis-of-scotlands-performance-in-the-commonwealth-games-1950-2002-1.pdf
  70. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2002/jul/24/guardiansocietysupplement4
  71. https://bwfbadminton.com/tournament/1910/2002-manchester-commonwealth-games
  72. https://www.bbc.co.uk/manchester/2002/events/index.shtml
  73. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport3/commonwealthgames2002/bsp/statistics/daily_schedule_28072002.stm
  74. https://cdn1.sportngin.com/attachments/document/0052/7619/2002commonwealthgames.pdf
  75. https://www.royal.uk/opening-ceremony-17th-commonwealth-games-manchester-25-july-2002
  76. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/2002-commonwealth-games-opening-ceremony-7417848
  77. https://www.walktheplank.co.uk/projects/commonwealth-games-manchester-2002/
  78. https://www.shropshirestar.com/news/nostalgia/2023/07/24/flashback-to-2002-manchester-heralds-start-of-a-glorious-sporting-spectacular/
  79. https://confidentials.com/manchester/the-2002-commonwealth-games-20-years-on
  80. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport3/commonwealthgames2002/hi/features/newsid_2172000/2172635.stm
  81. http://www.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/europe/08/04/uk.games.closing/index.html?related
  82. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/aug/05/commonwealthgames2002.commonwealthgames
  83. https://teamengland.org/news/team-england-at-home--looking-back-at-the-manchester-2002-and-glasgow-2014-commonwealth-games
  84. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport3/commonwealthgames2002/hi/front_page/newsid_2170000/2170044.stm
  85. https://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/commonwealth-games-closing-ceremony-peaks-at-nearly-10m/1151568.article
  86. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/history/2002-manchester-commonwealth-games/articleshow/6187863.cms
  87. https://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/5954296.englands-new-games-medals-record/
  88. https://sportstar.thehindu.com/commonwealth-games/news/india-at-commonwealth-games-history-milkha-singh-jaspal-rana/article65661413.ece
  89. https://commonwealthgames.com.au/athletes/ian-thorpe/
  90. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport3/commonwealthgames2002/hi/swimming/newsid_2172000/2172389.stm
  91. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2002/jul/31/commonwealthgames2002.commonwealthgames10
  92. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport3/commonwealthgames2002/hi/swimming/newsid_2162000/2162675.stm
  93. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2002/jul/31/commonwealthgames2002.commonwealthgames7
  94. https://commonwealthgames.com.au/athletes/ben-austin/
  95. https://worldathletics.org/news/news/edwards-and-radcliffe-supremacy-to-savour-c
  96. https://worldathletics.org/news/news/fergusons-fine-double-commonwealth-games-da
  97. https://www.paralympicheritage.org.uk/history-of-the-commonwealth-paraplegic-games
  98. https://paralympicanorak.wordpress.com/2013/01/18/commonwealth-games-para-sport-event-results-manchester-2002-delhi-2010/
  99. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2002/jul/24/commonwealthgames2002.commonwealthgames1
  100. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14775080701496719
  101. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2002/jul/21/communities.commonwealthgames2002
  102. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/do/10.5555/collection-news-5467/full/
  103. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237052169_Profiling_Major_Sport_Event_Visitors_The_2002_Commonwealth_Games
  104. https://www.yellowrailroad.com/client-projects/marketing-strategy/27-commonwealth-games-2002-marketing-plan
  105. https://www.bbc.co.uk/manchester/2002/who/index.shtml
  106. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport3/commonwealthgames2002/hi/bbc_coverage/default.stm
  107. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2002/jul/26/overnights
  108. https://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2002/08_august/05/commonwealth_roundup.shtml
  109. https://www.thetimes.com/travel/destinations/uk-travel/scotland-travel/glasgow/commonwealth-games-organisers-clash-with-bbc-over-pound81m-shortfall-mzwnxsn620q
  110. https://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/2007/news/evening-news-records-the-big-event/
  111. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport3/commonwealthgames2002/low/front_page/front_page_news/newsid_2146000/2146550.stm
  112. http://www.vanhorck.eu/bert-van-horck-memorable-achievements-international-crowd-management-company-icms-manchester-2002-commonwealth-games-life-changer/
  113. https://www.building.co.uk/commonwealth-games-security-tactics-hailed-as-/1022794.article
  114. https://www.eventplanninggroup.com/events/manchester-commonwealth-games
  115. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2001/jun/30/commonwealthgames2002.commonwealthgames
  116. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2001/jul/25/commonwealthgames2002.commonwealthgames
  117. https://resources.cwg-qbr.pulselive.com/qbr-commonwealth-games/document/2023/09/25/4eaf46ba-2a18-4392-8f73-4c4e60abc4bb/Games-Value-Framework-2021.pdf
  118. https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/research-and-analysis/2015/07/updated-review-evidence-legacy-major-sporting-events-july-2015/documents/00482176-pdf/00482176-pdf/govscot%253Adocument/00482176.pdf
  119. https://citiesmcr.wordpress.com/2012/07/02/ten-years-after-what-is-the-legacy-of-the-2002-commonwealth-games-for-manchester/
  120. https://manchesterarchiveplus.wordpress.com/2019/12/27/reflecting-on-the-25th-anniversary-of-the-manchester-velodrome-and-its-impact-on-cycling-in-britain/
  121. https://www.gov.scot/publications/review-evidence-legacy-major-sporting-events/pages/7/
  122. https://www.beatrizgarcia.net/2004/11/03/manchester-2002-commonwealth-games/
  123. https://www.itv.com/news/granada/2022-07-26/two-decades-on-from-manchester-commonwealth-games-could-it-host-the-olympics
  124. https://theinclusionpost.com/commonwealth-games-championing-inclusion/
  125. https://www.manchester.gov.uk/egov_downloads/6._Olympics.pdf
  126. https://www.manchester.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/2810/evaluation_of_the_commonwealth_games_legacy_programme.pdf
  127. https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/12509/1/brown%25202001%2520commonwealth%2520games%25202002.pdf
  128. https://manchestermill.co.uk/is-manchester-an-example-to-be-followed/
  129. https://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/cresc/workingpapers/wp77.pdf
  130. https://www.academia.edu/216162/Event_Regeneration_Critique_of_Manchesters_Development_Strategy_1980_2002
  131. https://unequalcities.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2019/10/Luke-and-Kaika-2019-Antipode.pdf
  132. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.3607
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.