Hubbry Logo
search button
Sign in
Complete variety
Complete variety
Comunity Hub
History
arrow-down
starMore
arrow-down
bob

Bob

Have a question related to this hub?

bob

Alice

Got something to say related to this hub?
Share it here.

#general is a chat channel to discuss anything related to the hub.
Hubbry Logo
search button
Sign in
Complete variety
Community hub for the Wikipedia article
logoWikipedian hub
Welcome to the community hub built on top of the Complete variety Wikipedia article. Here, you can discuss, collect, and organize anything related to Complete variety. The purpose of the hub is to connect...
Add your contribution
Complete variety

In mathematics, in particular in algebraic geometry, a complete algebraic variety is an algebraic variety X, such that for any variety Y the projection morphism

is a closed map (i.e. maps closed sets onto closed sets).[a] This can be seen as an analogue of compactness in algebraic geometry: a topological space X is compact if and only if the above projection map is closed with respect to topological products.

The image of a complete variety is closed and is a complete variety. A closed subvariety of a complete variety is complete.

A complex variety is complete if and only if it is compact as a complex-analytic variety.[1]

The most common example of a complete variety is a projective variety, but there do exist complete non-projective varieties in dimensions 2 and higher. While any complete nonsingular surface is projective,[2] there exist nonsingular complete varieties in dimension 3 and higher which are not projective.[3] The first examples of non-projective complete varieties were given by Masayoshi Nagata[3] and Heisuke Hironaka.[4] An affine space of positive dimension is not complete.

The morphism taking a complete variety to a point is a proper morphism, in the sense of scheme theory. An intuitive justification of "complete", in the sense of "no missing points", can be given on the basis of the valuative criterion of properness, which goes back to Claude Chevalley.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Here the product variety X × Y does not carry the product topology, in general; the Zariski topology on it will have more closed sets (except in very simple cases). See also Segre embedding.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Mumford 1999, Chapter I.10.
  2. ^ Zariski, Oscar (1958). "Introduction to the Problem of Minimal Models in the Theory of Algebraic Surfaces". American Journal of Mathematics. 80: 146–184. doi:10.2307/2372827. JSTOR 2372827.
  3. ^ a b Nagata, Masayoshi (1958). "Existence theorems for nonprojective complete algebraic varieties". Illinois J. Math. 2: 490–498. doi:10.1215/ijm/1255454111.
  4. ^ Hironaka, Heisuke (1960). On the theory of birational blowing-up (thesis). Harvard University.

Sources

[edit]