Hubbry Logo
Cursive hieroglyphsCursive hieroglyphsMain
Open search
Cursive hieroglyphs
Community hub
Cursive hieroglyphs
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cursive hieroglyphs
Cursive hieroglyphs
Cursive hieroglyphs
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A section of the Papyrus of Ani showing cursive hieroglyphs.

Cursive hieroglyphs, or hieroglyphic book hand, are a form of Egyptian hieroglyphs commonly used for handwritten religious documents, such as the Book of the Dead.[1] This style of writing was typically written with ink and a reed brush on papyrus, wood, or leather.[1] It was particularly common during the Ramesside Period, and many famous documents, such as the Papyrus of Ani, use it. It was also employed on wood for religious literature such as the Coffin Texts.

Cursive hieroglyphs should not be confused with the truly cursive form of hieroglyphs known as hieratic. Hieratic has many ligatures and signs unique to itself. However, there is a certain degree of influence from hieratic in the visual appearance of some signs. One significant difference is that the orientation of cursive hieroglyphs is not constant, reading right to left or left to right depending on the context, whereas hieratic is always read right to left.[2] A right-to-left reading direction is also most common in the writing of cursive hieroglyphs, but they are usually arranged in columns rather than rows.[1] The differences between cursive hieroglyphs and hieratic only became apparent after the end of the Old Kingdom, beginning with the First Intermediate Period. From this point, cursive hieroglyphs were mainly only used in sacralised contexts.[3]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cursive hieroglyphs

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Cursive hieroglyphs, also known as , constitute a fluid, handwritten adaptation of the formal Egyptian hieroglyphic script, retaining pictorial elements while allowing for faster execution on perishable materials like . First attested in the First Dynasty, it developed distinctly during the First Intermediate Period (c. 2181–2055 BCE) as a practical intermediary between the rigid, monumental hieroglyphs carved in stone for temples and tombs and the more abstracted cursive used for administrative purposes. It gained prominence in the Middle Kingdom (c. 2055–1650 BCE) and especially the New Kingdom (c. 1550–1070 BCE), where they were employed almost exclusively for religious and funerary documents. Unlike standard hieroglyphs, which prioritize artistic symmetry and orientation based on content direction, cursive hieroglyphs feature simplified signs written in continuous lines, typically in columns from right to left or left to right, using and reed brushes for a calligraphic flow. In contrast to , which abstracts signs into linear strokes with ligatures for broad secular applications, cursive hieroglyphs preserve recognizable iconic forms with fewer ligatures, making them suitable for illuminated manuscripts where visual symbolism remained paramount. The script's primary use was in producing personalized funerary papyri, such as vignettes from the , where spells and illustrations were rendered to guide the deceased through the , often customized for elite individuals. Notable examples include the (c. 1250 BCE), showcasing vibrant colors and integrated text that blend artistry with readability. Though less common after the New Kingdom, cursive hieroglyphs persisted in Ptolemaic and Roman-era religious papyri as a nod to tradition, highlighting their enduring association with sacred contexts. Their decipherment in the 19th century, building on Jean-François Champollion's work with the , has illuminated the interplay between form and function in ancient Egyptian literacy.

Overview

Definition

Cursive hieroglyphs constitute a cursive variant of the ancient Egyptian hieroglyphic script, employed primarily for handwritten religious and funerary texts on materials such as papyrus, wood, and occasionally or . This form of writing emerged as a practical adaptation for producing documents more rapidly than the rigid monumental hieroglyphs used in carvings, yet it preserved a close pictorial resemblance to those formal signs to uphold their symbolic and sacred qualities. The primary purpose of cursive hieroglyphs was to enable efficient transcription in ritual and devotional contexts, such as spells and hymns in funerary papyri, while maintaining the visual and ideographic integrity essential for religious efficacy. In contrast to more abstracted everyday scripts like , which simplified signs for administrative speed, cursive hieroglyphs prioritized fidelity to the original pictorial forms to ensure the potency of sacred inscriptions. An alternative designation for this script is "hieroglyphic book hand," reflecting its specialized role in manuscript production for elite and priestly use within the broader hieroglyphic tradition.

Historical Context

Cursive hieroglyphs first appear in attestations from the late and became more distinct during the First Intermediate Period and Middle Kingdom (c. 2055–1650 BCE), representing a more fluid and abbreviated adaptation of the rigid monumental hieroglyphs that had been established earlier in the for carved inscriptions on stone. This development facilitated faster writing with brush and ink on materials such as and wood, making it ideal for producing religious texts like the , which were inscribed on coffins to guide the deceased through the . The script gained particular prominence in the New Kingdom (c. 1550–1070 BCE), where it was used extensively for funerary papyri such as the . In the scribal traditions of pharaonic , cursive hieroglyphs served as a specialized tool within a multifaceted that supported religious, administrative, and monumental functions essential to maintaining social and cosmic order. Trained in temple institutions, scribes employed this script predominantly for sacred , including funerary spells and documents, while parallel scripts like handled everyday administration and formal hieroglyphs adorned tombs and temples. The script's prominence waned during the Late Period (c. 664–332 BCE) as the demotic script, a further simplified cursive form derived from , became the standard for administrative, legal, and literary purposes among the general population. Despite this shift, cursive hieroglyphs endured in religious contexts through the Ptolemaic period (305–30 BCE), where it was used by priests for temple inscriptions and sacred manuscripts until the increasing influence of Greek administration and led to its eventual obsolescence.

Development

Origins

Cursive hieroglyphs developed as a ligatured and fluid adaptation of the rigid monumental hieroglyphs during the transition from to the Middle Kingdom, roughly spanning the late BCE. This evolution addressed the practical demands of ancient Egyptian scribes for a script that enabled faster inscription of religious and funerary content on and wood, without fully abandoning the symbolic precision and aesthetic formality of carved inscriptions used in temples and tombs. The earliest substantial evidence of cursive hieroglyphs is found in the , a corpus of mortuary spells composed and inscribed primarily during the 11th Dynasty (c. 2134–1991 BCE). These texts, often written in ink on coffin interiors, demonstrate scribes' adaptation of traditional hieroglyphic signs into a more streamlined form suitable for brushwork, facilitating the documentation of elaborate rituals for non-royal elites. This innovation arose within scribal training environments linked to temple complexes, where and professional scribes refined the script to reconcile expeditious writing with the purity essential to sacred . By retaining recognizable pictorial elements, these practitioners ensured the script's compatibility with religious contexts, distinguishing it from more abbreviated administrative systems.

Evolution Across Periods

During the Middle Kingdom, cursive hieroglyphs underwent significant standardization, particularly in funerary contexts, where they were employed for inscribing the on wooden coffins and related artifacts. This script's adoption marked a shift toward more efficient writing for elaborate spells and protective formulas, allowing scribes to produce detailed texts on curved surfaces without the rigidity of monumental hieroglyphs. Examples include early Middle Kingdom coffins from sites like Deir el-Bersha, where cursive forms facilitated the rendering of vertical columns of text in a flowing manner suited to funerary monuments. In the New Kingdom, cursive hieroglyphs evolved into more fluid and varied forms, reflecting adaptations for diverse applications in religious and administrative settings. They became a staple in temple libraries for copying sacred texts and in royal decrees, where the script's linearity accommodated longer narratives on . This period saw the emergence of regional stylistic differences, such as those in Theban workshops, enhancing expressiveness in vignettes accompanying spells. Notably, precursors to the , like the New Kingdom versions of funerary papyri, frequently utilized cursive hieroglyphs for their balance of readability and artistic integration. By the Late Period, cursive hieroglyphs maintained continuity in elite and religious usage, appearing in select manuscripts and oracular documents, though with increasing stylization to align with evolving artistic conventions. In the subsequent Greco-Roman era, particularly under Ptolemaic rule, the script was used in bilingual temple inscriptions and magical papyri alongside Greek, such as those from the Tebtunis temple library. This adaptation prolonged its use into the 1st century CE, after which it largely faded as Demotic and Greek supplanted it in everyday and administrative roles.

Characteristics

Graphical Features

Cursive hieroglyphs maintain the iconic shapes of their monumental counterparts, preserving recognizable pictorial elements such as birds, animals, and objects, while adapting them for quicker execution through simplified forms and separate signs that enhance fluidity without ligatures. This retention allows scribes to evoke the symbolic potency of traditional hieroglyphs without the constraints of , as the forms are rendered in a linear style suitable for application. The script employs the full range of sign types—uniliterals for phonetic values, biliterals for combined , and determinatives for semantic clarification—in that are more streamlined and less rigid than the precisely chiseled monumental hieroglyphs. These signs often feature abbreviated outlines and separate components, prioritizing efficiency over the elaborate detailing seen in stone inscriptions, which results in a visually lighter and more dynamic appearance. Applied primarily with using a on , cursive hieroglyphs exhibit natural variations in stroke thickness depending on the pressure exerted by the , creating subtle contrasts that add expressiveness to the text. This medium also permits occasional omissions of , such as internal lines or secondary features in complex signs, further streamlining the without compromising overall . Such adaptations were particularly valued in religious texts, where the script's practicality supported the production of extensive manuscripts.

Writing Direction and Layout

Cursive hieroglyphs predominantly followed a right-to-left writing direction, mirroring the convention of monumental hieroglyphs, though variations allowing left-to-right orientation occurred depending on the context of the or artistic composition. Animate figures within , such as depictions of humans or animals, were oriented to face toward the beginning of the line or column, ensuring visual coherence with the reading flow and enhancing the script's performative qualities in religious texts. This directional flexibility distinguished cursive hieroglyphs from more rigidly unidirectional cursive scripts like , while maintaining recognizability even when signs were reversed. On rolls, cursive hieroglyphs were typically arranged in vertical columns or horizontal lines, adapting to the medium's elongated format for extended funerary or ritual documents such as the . Vertical columns were especially common in New Kingdom examples, providing a structured layout that accommodated vignettes and spells, with texts often progressing from top to bottom within each column. Horizontal lines appeared in shorter sections or administrative drafts, facilitating quicker production. To support precise alignment in this book-hand style, scribes occasionally employed faint guidelines—subtle horizontal or vertical rulings—to regulate sign placement and prevent misalignment during . Signs in cursive hieroglyphs were grouped into phonetic complements, determinatives, and ideograms to convey meaning efficiently, with deliberate spacing between word groups to preserve readability despite the script's fluid, handwritten nature. This organization mirrored monumental conventions but allowed for abbreviated forms suited to ink application on , ensuring the text remained legible without sacrificing the iconic essence of individual signs. Such spacing and grouping practices were crucial for maintaining the script's ritual efficacy in contexts like inscriptions or papyri, where visual clarity supported and interpretation.

Usage

Primary Contexts

Cursive hieroglyphs, also known as linear hieroglyphs, were predominantly employed in ancient Egyptian religious and funerary , particularly for inscribing spells, hymns, and protective texts on amulets and scrolls associated with the . This script's schematic yet iconic form preserved the sacred potency of traditional hieroglyphs while allowing for more fluid handwriting on perishable materials, making it ideal for personal funerary equipment like the and . From the Middle Kingdom onward, it became the preferred medium for such texts, appearing frequently on coffins, tomb walls, and papyri to invoke divine protection and ensure the deceased's eternal well-being. In temple settings, cursive hieroglyphs found application in documents and priestly correspondence, where the need for hieroglyphic fidelity underscored the texts' sanctity and efficacy. Liturgical manuscripts and performance aids for daily temple , such as those archived in temple libraries, utilized this script to maintain the visual and symbolic integrity required for priestly duties, distinguishing it from more utilitarian cursive forms like . These uses reflected the script's role in elite religious practices, handled by skilled scribes to support ceremonies and communications among temple personnel. While cursive hieroglyphs occasionally overlapped with administrative functions in sacred inventories, such as cataloging temple offerings or items, they were largely avoided in secular daily records to preserve their association with the divine. This restriction to ritual and funerary domains limited their broader bureaucratic application, emphasizing instead their prestige in contexts demanding symbolic precision over expediency.

Notable Examples

One prominent example of cursive hieroglyphs is found in the New Kingdom Book of the Dead papyri, which served as personalized funerary texts combining spells, vignettes, and illustrations to guide the deceased through the . The , dating to approximately 1250 BCE during the 19th Dynasty, exemplifies this usage; created for the royal scribe Ani, it features approximately 24 meters of inscribed with cursive hieroglyphs in , accompanied by vivid color vignettes depicting scenes such as the weighing of the heart and Ani's encounters with deities. This manuscript, now housed in the , demonstrates the fluid, handwritten style of cursive hieroglyphs adapted for , allowing scribes to produce detailed religious narratives more efficiently than formal monumental script. In the Middle Kingdom (circa 2050–1710 BCE), cursive hieroglyphs appeared in inscribed on wooden panels and , marking an early adaptation of the script for funerary purposes beyond elite tombs. These texts, comprising over 1,000 spells for protection and transformation in the , were often written in vertical bands on the interior surfaces of using cursive forms to facilitate quicker execution on wood. A notable instance is the dismantled of Khety from , where the side panels bear in cursive hieroglyphic script, painted in black ink and framed by decorative borders, highlighting the script's role in democratizing access to rituals for provincial elites. Such examples illustrate how cursive hieroglyphs bridged formal hieroglyphic traditions with practical inscription needs during this period of cultural expansion. During the Ptolemaic period (305–30 BCE), cursive hieroglyphs appeared in temple inscriptions that integrated Egyptian religious motifs with Greek elements, reflecting the syncretic culture under Hellenistic rule. At the Temple of on Philae, several dedicatory stelae and wall inscriptions feature hieroglyphic texts alongside Greek dedications, as seen in the donation stelae of from 157 BCE, where Egyptian spells coexist with Greek dedications to the goddess , emphasizing royal piety and cultural fusion. These artifacts, carved on surfaces, showcase the script's persistence in monumental contexts, often using cursive forms for preparatory or secondary texts alongside more rigid hieroglyphs, until the late 4th century CE.

Relations to Other Scripts

Distinctions from Hieratic

Cursive hieroglyphs and represent two distinct cursive adaptations of the ancient Egyptian hieroglyphic script, differing primarily in their graphical fidelity, intended speed of execution, and contextual applications. Cursive hieroglyphs preserve a greater degree of detailed pictorial elements from the formal hieroglyphs, ensuring precision in religious and ritualistic inscriptions where symbolic accuracy was essential. In contrast, hieratic abstracts and simplifies signs to facilitate rapid writing, prioritizing efficiency for administrative and secular purposes. A key graphical distinction lies in the level of cursive flow and sign modification. exhibits pronounced fluidity, with many signs reduced to linear strokes or interconnected ligatures for swift brushwork on or ostraca; for instance, bird signs like the (Gardiner G5) or (G1) are often depicted as simple, elongated lines devoid of intricate feathers or contours. , however, adhere more closely to the iconic forms of monumental hieroglyphs, incorporating moderate cursive adjustments while retaining recognizable pictorial features, such as curved wings or distinct head shapes in avian glyphs. This closer fidelity in supports their use in sacred manuscripts, where visual symbolism carried theological weight. Despite temporal overlap beginning in the Middle Kingdom (c. 2050–1710 BCE), the scripts served separate corpora that underscored their specialized roles. Cursive hieroglyphs appeared primarily in religious texts, such as funerary papyri including the , emphasizing ceremonial continuity with hieroglyphic traditions. , originating earlier in the (c. 2686–2181 BCE), was the standard for practical documents like administrative accounts, legal records, and personal letters, enabling the high-volume documentation of daily governance and commerce. This division maintained hieratic's practicality without encroaching on the ritual sanctity preserved by cursive hieroglyphs.

Influence on Demotic

Cursive hieroglyphs and Demotic both ultimately derive from the hieroglyphic script but represent different branches of development. While cursive hieroglyphs maintained a semi-formal, pictorial style for religious and funerary contexts, Demotic emerged during the Late Period (c. 664–332 BCE) as a highly cursive evolution of late , particularly its "abnormal hieratic" variant, adapted for administrative, legal, and vernacular purposes. Demotic incorporated phonetic components and ligatures that trace back through hieratic to hieroglyphic origins, showing indirect shared ancestry with cursive hieroglyphs in sign forms, such as uniliterals and biliterals for phonemes like /m/ or /n/. However, Demotic further abstracted these into stylized, linear symbols emphasizing speed and efficiency over pictorial representation, diverging from the more iconic retention in cursive hieroglyphs. Layout conventions, like horizontal lines and columns, appear in both but were independently adapted in Demotic for secular texts. Transitional scripts in the 26th Dynasty (c. 664–525 BCE) from Thebes illustrate the hieratic-to-Demotic shift, with abnormal hieratic—a cursive form of hieratic—bridging the gap. Documents from the scribe family of Pȝ-dỉ-Ḥr-Rsn sȝ Pȝ-dỉ-Ỉmn-Ỉp, including legal papyri, show variable writings of names like Ỉmn evolving from hieratic influences into standardized Demotic ligatures around 600–500 BCE, highlighting the permeation of cursive elements into popular usage without direct involvement of cursive hieroglyphs.

Modern Study

Decipherment

The decipherment of cursive hieroglyphs presented formidable initial challenges, largely owing to the scarcity of surviving texts, which were predominantly inscribed on fragile rolls used for religious and funerary purposes, leading to significant losses over millennia due to . The breakthrough came with the 1799 discovery of the , a dated to 196 BCE bearing a Ptolemaic in three scripts—hieroglyphic, demotic, and Greek—allowing scholars to correlate the enigmatic hieroglyphic forms with the comprehensible Greek translation and the related demotic cursive, thus unlocking the phonetic and ideographic principles underlying Egyptian writing systems, including cursive variants. In the early 19th century, French scholar advanced this process by identifying cursive hieroglyphs in religious papyri as abbreviated, flowing adaptations of monumental hieroglyphs, rather than wholly independent scripts. Drawing on his 1822 realization that hieroglyphs included phonetic elements—demonstrated through royal names on the —Champollion examined papyri containing texts like the , mapping cursive signs to their hieroglyphic equivalents and confirming their shared grammatical structure, which enabled the first reliable translations of these manuscript forms. A foundational milestone in systematizing the reading of cursive hieroglyphs was Alan H. Gardiner's Egyptian Grammar: Being an Introduction to the Study of Hieroglyphs, published in 1927, which introduced standardized conventions for transcribing over 700 signs, including cursive variants, through detailed classifications, examples from papyri, and guidelines for handling ligatures and stylistic deviations. This comprehensive reference, drawing on prior decipherments, provided Egyptologists with a uniform methodology to accurately render and interpret the fluid script, facilitating broader access to ancient religious literature.

Contemporary Analysis

Contemporary scholars employ advanced techniques to enhance the study of fragmented papyri containing hieroglyphs, particularly focusing on the challenges posed by ligatures that blend multiple signs into fluid forms. High-resolution and vector-based allow researchers to isolate and analyze these ligatures, revealing details obscured by degradation or overwriting in ancient manuscripts. For instance, the AKU-PAL database (version 1.4, as of November 2025), developed as part of the Ancient Egyptian Cursive Scripts project by the Academy of Sciences and Literature in (ongoing since 2015 and planned until approximately 2038), provides searchable high-resolution scans and representations of signs from papyri dating from 2700 BCE to 300 CE, enabling precise comparisons across fragments and improving overall readability. AI-assisted sign recognition has further revolutionized this field by automating the identification of forms in damaged texts, reducing manual transcription errors and accelerating . models, trained on large datasets of hieroglyphic variants, process ligatures through convolutional neural networks to detect patterns in and form variability, as demonstrated in processing pipelines applied to selected cursive hieroglyph corpora. The Hieratic Studies Online (HSO) series integrates tools to identify graphemes, such as bird signs in papyri, facilitating the reconstruction of religious texts where ligatures obscure phonetic elements. These tools not only aid in deciphering individual fragments but also support broader palaeographic studies by quantifying script evolution over time. Linguistic investigations into cursive hieroglyphs emphasize phonetic variations within religious contexts, employing comparative analyses with corpora to elucidate orthographic preferences and sound representations. In funerary and magical texts, cursive hieroglyphs often exhibit distinct phonological adaptations, such as abbreviated consonant clusters or ideographic substitutions that differ from hieratic's more streamlined , reflecting ritualistic emphases on and symbolism. For example, studies of semantic classifiers in cursive forms reveal variations in categorization tendencies compared to hieratic, influencing how phonetic values are inferred in Late Period religious inscriptions. The HSO series documents these phonological and morphological features across scribal hands, highlighting regional differences in phonetic rendering that enhance understanding of spoken Egyptian in priestly settings. Post-2000 archaeological excavations have significantly expanded the corpus of ancient Egyptian papyri, with key finds from tombs since 2010 providing additional materials for comparative studies of cursive hieroglyphs and related scripts. Recoveries from multi-chamber tombs have increased the available samples for analysis, underscoring the script's persistence into the Ptolemaic era and its influence on evolving religious .

References

  1. https://en.aku.uni-mainz.de/die-systematische-analyse/
  2. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/28284/chapter/214469546
  3. https://worldhistoryedu.com/cursive-hieroglyphs/
  4. https://www.britannica.com/topic/hieroglyphic-writing
  5. https://crewsproject.wordpress.com/2018/04/27/crews-display-coffin-fragment-with-egyptian-hieroglyphs/
  6. https://pharaoh.se/ancient-egypt/hieroglyphs/
  7. https://www.historytoday.com/miscellanies/scribe-ancient-egyptian
  8. https://www.britannica.com/topic/demotic-script
  9. https://mnamon.sns.it/index.php?page=Scrittura&id=33&lang=en
  10. https://www.globalegyptianmuseum.org/glossary.aspx?id=115
  11. https://zenodo.org/records/1306342
  12. https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/312515/1/D_Laboury_The%20Sign%20as%20an%20Image%E2%80%A6_in%20Polis_St_Guide%20to%20the%20Writing%20Systems%20of%20Ancient%20Egypt_2023_GIFAO_002.pdf
  13. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/07410883251349207
  14. https://escholarship.org/content/qt1fh2r94g/qt1fh2r94g.pdf
  15. https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/hieratic/FF268461EFDC77F0DAFBC1565C9F5D3E
  16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.21275882
  17. https://escholarship.org/content/qt2kz858gv/qt2kz858gv.pdf
  18. https://oi-idb-static.uchicago.edu/multimedia/239131/oimp39.pdf
  19. https://dh.scu.edu/exhibits/exhibits/show/finalprojectsarahfloyd/---the-book-of-the-dead--the-p
  20. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/555675
  21. https://www.academia.edu/12106500/The_Coffin_Texts_and_the_Democratization_of_Religion_in_the_Middle_Kingdom
  22. https://www.attalus.org/egypt/dodekaschoinos.html
  23. https://www.academia.edu/13309019/Hieratic_Drafts_for_Hieroglyphic_Texts_in_U_Verhoeven_ed_%25C3%2584gyptologische_Binsen_Weisheiten_I_II_Neue_Forschungen_und_Methoden_der_Hieratistik_Mainz_and_Stuttgart_2015_67_84
  24. https://www.academia.edu/93502863/The_hieratic_script_and_its_formation_from_a_linguistic_perspective
  25. https://arce.org/resource/demotic-history-development-and-techniques-ancient-egypts-popular-script/
  26. https://journals.openedition.org/bifao/19483
  27. https://www.britishmuseum.org/blog/preserving-papyrus-caring-4000-year-old-documents
  28. https://www.britishmuseum.org/exhibitions/hieroglyphs-unlocking-ancient-egypt/egyptian-hieroglyphs-decipherment-timeline
  29. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/rosetta-stone-hieroglyphs-champollion-decipherment-egypt-180980834/
  30. https://www.voicesofancientegypt.com/rosetta-stone-champollion-young/
  31. https://archive.org/details/egyptiangrammarb0000unse_i5g3
  32. https://digitalorientalist.com/2025/03/11/ancient-egyptian-hieratic-palaeography-database-aku-pal/
  33. https://en.aku.uni-mainz.de/
  34. https://en.aku.uni-mainz.de/hieratic-studies-online-hso/
  35. https://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/items/18988023-741c-444a-a364-ff828d72b954
  36. https://direct.mit.edu/coli/article/49/3/703/116160/Machine-Learning-for-Ancient-Languages-A-Survey
  37. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/25138502241226983
  38. https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/110309/1/Polis_2017_LinguisticVariation_OUP.pdf
  39. https://www.livescience.com/see-photos-of-stunningly-preserved-52-foot-long-book-of-the-dead-papyrus-from-ancient-egypt
  40. https://archaeologymag.com/2023/01/archaeologists-discovered-a-16-meter-long-ancient-papyrus-in-egypt/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.