Welcome to the community hub built on top of the Decanonization Wikipedia article.
Here, you can discuss, collect, and organize anything related to Decanonization. The
purpose of the hub is to connect peo...
In the Russian Orthodox Church, the most famous case is the decanonization of the Right-BelievingprincessAnna of Kashin at the Great Moscow Synod in 1677–1678. The reason for the decanonization was the religious policy of the forcible introduction in Russia of the three fingerssign of the cross, instead of the older two fingers variant.[18][19] The reforms that began under Alexis Mikhailovich and continued under Peter I and his followers demanded a political and ecclesiastical separation from the previous tradition and national culture, which included the decanonization of persons whose literary or hagiographic works contradicted the new religious policy. The veneration of the famous ecclesiastical writer and translator Maximus the Greek was suspended. Memorial days associated with 21 Russian saints were removed from the Typikon of 1682.[20] During the reign of Peter I, the veneration of the martyrs Anthony, John, and Eustathius, who wore beards and suffered under a clean-shaven pagan knyaz, was stopped.[21] After 1721 the number of new canonizations sharply decreased (only 2 new saints were canonized). In the 18th century there was a decanonization of a number of locally revered saints. However, in the 19th century, church veneration of many locally venerated saints was restored. Hegumen Andronik (Trubachev) believes that the most pernicious were not specific decanonizations, but the very admission of decanonization into church life as a possible norm, a rule implemented due to a change in church policy.[22]
In the 20th century, some of the names of previously decanonized saints were returned to the church calendar. The re-canonization of Anna of Kashin took place in the Russian Orthodox Church in 1909. However, most of the ancient Russian ascetics, whose veneration was terminated during the "struggle against Raskol", remained forgotten.[23]
In 2013, 36 saints, New Martyrs who suffered from repression during the Soviet era, were decanonized. Their names were removed from the 2013 Russian Orthodox Church calendar without explanation.[24][25][26][27][28]
There are several examples of decanonization in the Catholic Church throughout the centuries. Among the saints decanonized were Kakwykylla, Wilgefortis, Werner, Liban and a host of others deemed to be legendary figures with no historical veracity. The official position of the church is that persons may still maintain private devotions to these saints, however they are forbidden from public veneration as there is no sufficient evidence for their existence.
On 16 Nov. 1538 Henry VIII issued a proclamation declaring that all images and pictures of Thomas Becket were to be "put down," and all mention of him in calendar and service book to be erased.[31]
There are members of the clergy and other people in both the Orthodox and Catholic Churches who consider the term "decanonization" to be incorrect. They reject the very possibility of decanonization, regarding canonization as an infallible act that cannot be corrected. They believe that all canonized saints existed, went to Heaven, and remain in Heaven.[33][34][35][36][37]
^Ткачев Е. В.Канонизация. Православная энциклопедия. – М. : Церковно-научный центр «Православная энциклопедия», 2012. – Т. XXX. – С. 269–359. – ISBN 978-5-89572-031-8]
^Canonization Christianity // Encyclopædia Britannica – Canonization, official act of a Christian communion – mainly the Roman Catholic Church but also the Eastern Orthodox Church – declaring one of its deceased members worthy of public cult and entering his or her name in the canon, or authorized list, of that communion’s recognized saints.
^Making martyrs East & West : canonization in the Catholic and Russian Orthodox churches / Cathy Caridi. – DeKalb, Ill. : NIU press, cop. 2016 / p. 135
^Крест и круг : из истории христианской символики / Б. А. Успенский. – Москва : Языки славянской культур, 2006. – 488 с., [12] л. ил., цв. ил. : цв. ил.; 22 см.; ISBN 5-9551-0108-X (в пер.); ISSN 1727-1630 /с. 90. – Московский собор 1678 г., принявший решение о деканонизации св. Анны Кашинской на том основании, что мощи ее сохранились с двуперстно сложенной рукой / с. 333 – „При патриархе Иоакиме (1675-1690 гг.) были случаи деканонизации святых на том, в частности, основании, что их мощи сохранились с двуперстно сложенной рукой. Так случилось с Анной Кашинской в 1678 г. и с Евфимием Архангелогородским в 1683 г. (см.: Голубинский, 1903, с. 166; Вургафт и Ушаков, 1996, с. 28, 92).“ / с. 365 – Анна Кашинская (в иночестве София) († 1368), жена кн. Михаила Ярославича Тверского; канонизирована в 1649 г., деканонизирована в 1678 г., вновь признана святой в 1909 г.
^Святость в эпоху Петра Первого / Наумов А. Е. // Именно в его время мы сталкиваемся с довольно необычным для Восточной церкви допущением в церковную жизнь деканонизации, идущей вслед за изменением церковной политики. Ярким примером этого является преп. Анна Кашинская, которая была прославлена в 1650 г., а ее деканонизация была проведена патриархом Иоакимом в 1677 г. <...> И преп. Максим Грек, местное прославление которого совершилось по благословению патриарха Иова в 1591 г., был деканонизирован, вероятно, устным запрещением, по таким же причинам. <...> в XVIII в. оказались деканонизированы десятки подвижников.
^Ткачев Е. В.Канонизация. Православная энциклопедия. — М. : Церковно-научный центр «Православная энциклопедия», 2012. — Т. XXX. — С. 269—359. — ISBN 978-5-89572-031-8] — „Однако деканонизация с канонической точки зрения невозможна как в католической, так и в православной традиции. Возможно лишь признание канонизации не бывшей, если осуществивший ее орган или лицо не имели на то права либо решение о канонизации было принято с нарушением канонической процедуры. Имевшие место в РПЦ деканонизации были явлением неканоническим и позднее толковались как «приостановление почитания» определенных святых до соборного рассмотрения в связи с возникновением сомнения в том, имела ли место их канонизация“