Welcome to the community hub built on top of the Erdős conjecture on arithmetic progressions Wikipedia article.
Here, you can discuss, collect, and organize anything related to Erdős conjecture on arithmetic progressions. The
purpose of the hub is to connect people, foster deeper knowledge, and help improve
the root Wikipedia article.
Formally, the conjecture states that if A is a large set in the sense that
then A contains arithmetic progressions of any given length, meaning that for every positive integer k there are an integer a and a non-zero integer c such that .
In 1936, Erdős and Turán made the weaker conjecture that any set of integers with positive natural density contains infinitely many three-term arithmetic progressions.[1] This was proven by Klaus Roth in 1952, and generalized to arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions by Szemerédi in 1975 in what is now known as Szemerédi's theorem.
In a 1976 talk titled "To the memory of my lifelong friend and collaborator Paul Turán," Paul Erdős offered a prize of US$3000 for a proof of this conjecture.[2] In 1996 he raised the prize to US$5000.[3]
Erdős' conjecture on arithmetic progressions can be viewed as a stronger version of Szemerédi's theorem. Because the sum of the reciprocals of the primes diverges, the Green–Tao theorem on arithmetic progressions is a special case of the conjecture.
The weaker claim that A must contain infinitely many arithmetic progressions of length 3 is a consequence of an improved bound in Roth's theorem. A 2016 paper by Bloom[4] proved that if contains no non-trivial three-term arithmetic progressions then .
In 2020 a preprint by Bloom and Sisask[5] improved the bound to for some absolute constant .
In 2023 a new bound of [6][7][8] was found by computer scientists Kelley and Meka, with an exposition given in more familiar mathematical language by Bloom and Sisask,[9][10] who have since improved the exponent of the Kelly-Meka bound to , and conjectured , in a preprint.[11]
^Problems in number theory and Combinatorics, in Proceedings of the Sixth Manitoba Conference on Numerical Mathematics (Univ. Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man., 1976), Congress. Numer. XVIII, 35–58, Utilitas Math., Winnipeg, Man., 1977
^Bloom, Thomas F. (2016). "A quantitative improvement for Roth's theorem on arithmetic progressions". Journal of the London Mathematical Society. Second Series. 93 (3): 643–663. arXiv:1405.5800. doi:10.1112/jlms/jdw010. MR3509957. S2CID27536138.
^Bloom, Thomas F.; Sisask, Olof (2020). "Breaking the logarithmic barrier in Roth's theorem on arithmetic progressions". arXiv:2007.03528 [math.NT].
^Bloom, Thomas F.; Sisask, Olof (2023-02-14). "The Kelley–Meka bounds for sets free of three-term arithmetic progressions". Essential Number Theory. 2: 15–44. arXiv:2302.07211. doi:10.2140/ent.2023.2.15.
^Bloom, Thomas F.; Sisask, Olof (2023-09-05). "An improvement to the Kelley-Meka bounds on three-term arithmetic progressions". arXiv:2309.02353 [math.NT].