Hubbry Logo
Eunice Newton FooteEunice Newton FooteMain
Open search
Eunice Newton Foote
Community hub
Eunice Newton Foote
logo
25 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Eunice Newton Foote
Eunice Newton Foote
from Wikipedia

Eunice Newton Foote (born Eunice Newton; July 17, 1819 – September 30, 1888) was an American scientist, inventor, and women's rights campaigner. She was the first scientist to identify the insulating effect of certain gases, and that therefore rising carbon dioxide (CO2) levels could increase atmospheric temperature and affect climate, a phenomenon now referred to as the greenhouse effect. Born in Connecticut, Foote was raised in New York at the center of social and political movements of her day, such as the abolition of slavery, anti-alcohol activism, and women's rights. She attended the Troy Female Seminary and the Rensselaer School from age 17 to age 19, gaining a broad education in scientific theory and practice.

Key Information

After marrying attorney Elisha Foote in 1841, Foote settled in Seneca Falls, New York. She was a signatory to the Declaration of Sentiments and one of the editors of the proceedings of the 1848 Seneca Falls Convention, the first gathering to treat women's rights as its sole focus. In 1856 she published a paper notable for demonstrating the absorption of heat by CO2 and water vapor and hypothesizing that changing amounts of CO2 in the atmosphere would alter the climate. It was the first known publication in a scientific journal by an American woman in the field of physics. She published a second paper in 1857, on static electricity in atmospheric gases. Although she was not a member of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), both her papers were read at the organization's annual conferences—these were the only papers in the field of physics to be written by an American woman until 1889. She went on to patent several inventions.

Foote died in 1888 and for almost a hundred years her contributions were unknown, before being rediscovered by women academics in the twentieth century. In the twenty-first century, new interest in Foote arose when it was realized that her work predated discoveries made by John Tyndall, who had been recognized by scientists as the first person to experimentally show the mechanism of the greenhouse effect involving infrared radiation. Detailed examination of her work by modern scientists has confirmed that three years before Tyndall published his paper in 1859, Foote discovered that water vapor and CO2 absorb heat from sunlight. Furthermore, her view that variances in the atmospheric levels of water vapor and CO2 would result in climate change preceded Tyndall's 1861 publication by five years. Because of the limits of her experimental design, and possibly a lack of knowledge of infrared radiation, Foote did not examine or detect the absorption and emission of radiant energy within the thermal infrared range, which is the cause of the greenhouse effect. In 2022, the American Geophysical Union instituted The Eunice Newton Foote Medal for Earth-Life Science in her honor to recognize outstanding scientific research.

Childhood and education

[edit]

Eunice Newton was born July 17, 1819, in Goshen, Connecticut, to Thirza and Isaac Newton Jr.[1] By 1820, the family had relocated to Ontario County in western New York.[2] Her father was a farmer and entrepreneur in East Bloomfield, amassing wealth and losing it through speculation.[3][4][5] Eunice was a distant relative of the scientist Isaac Newton.[6][7] Eunice had six sisters and five brothers, although the oldest sister died at two years old.[4][5][8] Her father died in 1835 and the fifth child, a daughter named Amanda, took it upon herself to rid the properties of debt and become sole owner to keep the family farm from being sold.[3][Notes 1] The area of New York where Eunice grew up and spent most of her life was the era's center of social activism. She would have been exposed to abolitionists, dress reform activists, mystics, temperance advocates, and women's rights campaigners.[11]

Sketch of a street scene with people walking on a sidewalk in front of a wrought iron fence. Parallel and behind the fence is a small building to the left connected to an open-front shed across the back and down the right side a large, stone, 4-story building.
Troy Female Seminary, 1822
Sketch of a Colonial Georgian-style building with two chimneys on both opposing sides of the roof.
Rensselaer School, 1824

Newton was educated at the Troy Female Seminary,[4][6] a pioneering women's preparatory school,[Notes 2] established by feminist Emma Willard. Students of the seminary were encouraged to attend science courses at the adjacent Rensselaer School, which was led by Amos Eaton, the senior professor and a proponent of women's education.[18][19] Eaton's innovative methods included lectures in scientific theory accompanied by practical experimentation in the laboratory, rather than rote memorization.[18][20][21] Newton attended these schools between 1836 and 1838.[18][22][23]

During Newton's attendance, the assistant principal of the seminary was Willard's sister Almira Hart Lincoln Phelps, who prepared the school's curricula and wrote textbooks for the students.[24][Notes 3] Students were allowed to challenge their marks prior to the weekly meeting evaluating their moral gaps.[26] Rather than the typical finishing school curricula offered to girls,[27] pupils studied dance, history, languages (English, French, Italian, Latin), literature, mathematics (general, algebra, geometry), music, painting, philosophy, rhetoric, and science (botany, domestic science).[5][28] At the Rensselaer School, Newton learned how to conduct research, as well as laboratory testing.[11][18][29] Girls attending the school could study astronomy, chemistry, geography, meteorology, and natural philosophy.[11][30]

Marriage and family life

[edit]

On August 12, 1841, in East Bloomfield, Newton married Elisha Foote Jr.[31][32][33] (1809–1883), a lawyer. Foote had trained in Johnstown, New York, under Judge Daniel Cady, the father of women's rights activist Elizabeth Cady Stanton.[34][Notes 4] In 1844, in a sheriff's sale, Elisha bought the house that the Stanton family moved into in 1847. He deeded it the following year to Daniel Cady, who in turn gave it to his daughter, Elizabeth in 1846.[37] Writer Ermina Leonard described Eunice as "a fine portrait and landscape painter",[31] who was also known as an amateur scientist and an inventor.[31][38] On her 1862 passport application, the officials described Foote as being just under 5 ft 2 in (1.57 m) tall, with blue-gray eyes, a "rather large" mouth, with an oval face, a sallow complexion, and dark brown hair.[29][39]

The marriage produced two daughters, Mary, born July 21, 1842, who became an artist, writer and women's rights advocate;[33][40] and Augusta, born October 24, 1844, who became a writer.[41] Both daughters were born in Seneca Falls.[31] Elisha became a judge who worked at the Court of Common Pleas in Seneca County, but he resigned from his post in 1846.[42][43] He continued working as a lawyer and Eunice designed and built a laboratory in their home.[22][32][44] By the spring of 1860, the family had relocated to Saratoga Springs, New York, where Augusta was privately schooled.[41][45] Elisha ran a private practice and was a specialist in patent law.[46]

In 1865, Elisha was appointed to serve an apprenticeship on the Board of Examiners-in-Chief for the United States Patent and Trademark Office.[46] The entire family relocated at that time to Washington, D.C.[40] While they were in Washington, both daughters married. Mary wed John B. Henderson, a US Senator from Missouri, a co-author of the 13th Amendment to abolish slavery and an advocate for the 15th Amendment to grant voting rights to former slaves.[47] They had a lavish ceremony in 1868, attended by many dignitaries, including US President Andrew Johnson.[48] The following year, Augusta married Francis Benjamin Arnold, a coffee importer from New York City.[49][50]

After completing his apprenticeship, Elisha was appointed the Commissioner of Patents, serving from July 25, 1868, through April 25, 1869.[46] When his term as commissioner expired, he remained on the Board of Examiners-in-Chief for several years.[51] The couple were living in East Bloomfield in 1872 and 1873,[52][53] were back in Washington in 1874,[54] but had returned to New York by 1878.[55] They were living in New York City in 1881.[56] While visiting in St. Louis, Missouri, in 1883, Elisha died at Mary's home.[57] After Elisha's death, Eunice lived partly in Brooklyn and partly in Lenox, Massachusetts.[58]

Campaigner for women's rights

[edit]
Photograph of a typed page surrounded by a yellow border of leaves with several title lines at the top and three columns of signatures in the body.
The signature page of the Declaration of Sentiments, bearing Foote's signature on the left

Eunice Foote was a neighbor and friend of suffragist Elizabeth Cady Stanton and attended the 1848 Seneca Falls Convention, the first women's rights convention.[18][59] As a member of the editorial committee for the convention, Foote and her husband Elisha were signatories of the convention's Declaration of Sentiments. The declaration, written by Stanton, demanded social and legal rights equal to those of men, as well as the right to vote.[59] Foote was one of the five women who prepared the proceedings of the convention for publication; the others were Stanton, Elizabeth M'Clintock, Mary Ann M'Clintock, and Amy Post.[60]

Scientific career

[edit]

"Circumstances Affecting the Heat of the Sun's Rays"

[edit]

An amateur scientist, Foote conducted a series of experiments that demonstrated the interactions of sunlight on different gases.[59] She used an air pump, two glass cylinders, and four mercury-in-glass thermometers. In each cylinder, she placed two thermometers and then used the pump to evacuate the air from one cylinder and compress it in the other cylinder.[61][62] When both cylinders reached equal ambient temperatures, they were placed in the sunlight and temperature variances were measured.[61][63] She also placed the containers in the shade for comparison and tested the temperature results by dehydrating one cylinder and adding water to the other, to measure the effect of dry versus moist air.[6][33] Foote noted that the amount of moisture in the air impacted the temperature results.[18][61][63] She performed this experiment on air, carbon dioxide (CO2) (which was called carbonic acid gas in her era), and hydrogen, finding that the tube filled with carbon dioxide became hotter than the others when exposed to sunlight.[64] She wrote: "The receiver containing this gas became itself much heated—very sensibly more so than the other—and on being removed [from the Sun], it was many times as long in cooling".[59]

Photograph of pages 382 and 393 of a journal describing a scientific experiment.
Eunice Foote – "Circumstances Affecting the Heat of the Sun's Rays" (1856), American Journal of Science and Arts. Foote recognized the implications of carbon dioxide's heat-capturing properties—the greenhouse effect—for the entire planet.

Foote noted that CO2 reached a temperature of 125 °F (52 °C) and that the amount of moisture in the air contributed to temperature variances.[61][63] In connection with the history of the Earth, Foote theorized that "An atmosphere of that gas would give to our earth a high temperature; and if, as some suppose, at one period of its history, the air had mixed with it a larger proportion than at present, an increased temperature from its own action, as well as from increased weight, must have necessarily resulted."[61][65][66] Her theory was a clear statement of climatic warming caused by increased levels of CO2 in the atmosphere.[65]

Foote described her findings in a paper, "Circumstances Affecting the Heat of the Sun's Rays", that she submitted for the tenth annual AAAS meeting, held on August 23, 1856, in Albany, New York.[6][29][67] For reasons that are unclear,[4][68] Foote did not read her paper to those present—even the few women who became members seldom presented their work at the conference[6][7][Notes 5]—and her paper was instead presented by Joseph Henry of the Smithsonian Institution.[4][68] Henry introduced Foote's paper by stating "Science was of no country and of no sex. The sphere of woman embraces not only the beautiful and the useful, but the true".[29] Yet, he discounted her findings in the New-York Daily Tribune article about the presentation, saying "although the experiments were interesting and valuable, there were [many] [difficulties] encompassing [any] attempt to interpret their significance".[6][69]

The 1856 edition of the American Journal of Science and Arts published Foote's complete paper under her given name, immediately following a paper by her husband, Elisha.[6][61][70] Other than those on astronomy, the paper was the first known physics publication in a scientific journal by an American woman.[71] It was not however included by the AAAS in their annual publication of the association's meetings.[59][61] Summaries of Foote's work were included in the 1857 edition of The Annual of Scientific Discovery,[6][72] the Canadian Journal of Industry, Science and Art (1857),[6][73] the Jahresbericht über die Fortschritte der reinen, pharmaceutischen und technischen Chemie, Physik, Mineralogie und Geologie, 1856 (Annual Report on the Progress of Pure, Pharmaceutical, and Industrial Chemistry, Physics, Mineralogy, and Geology, 1856 (Giessen, 1857), the Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal (1857),[70] the newspaper New-York Daily Tribune, and the magazine Scientific American (1856).[6][69] Both the Giessen and Edinburgh summaries omitted her direct conclusions about the impact of carbon dioxide on climate. The summary written in the Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal indicated that two papers had been written, one by Elisha and one by Mrs. Elisha Foote, but the title of Elisha's paper, "On the Heat in the Sun's Rays", was given for both articles, although the summary was entirely devoted to Eunice's paper.[74] Foote was praised in the September 13, 1856, issue of Scientific American.[75] Although the article was titled "Scientific Ladies—Experiments with Condensed Gases", Foote was the primary subject.[76] Impressed that her theories were backed up by experiments, the authors stated, "This we are happy to say has been done by a lady",[61][77] and noted that "she was deeply acquainted with almost every branch of physical science".[76]

In the late 1770s, Horace Bénédict de Saussure had used a similar apparatus to Foote's and concluded that altitude impacted solar heat in an enclosed cylinder.[63][66] Joseph Fourier had theorized in the 1820s that atmospheric gases trapped solar heat.[18] Neither of them had recognized the increase in solar heat by CO2 and water vapor in the atmosphere, which was unique to Foote's findings.[63][78] In 1859, John Tyndall reported his more sophisticated research, using a Leslie cube and a differential spectrometer, showing that several gases both trapped and emitted infrared thermal radiation rather than sunlight.[6][59][71] His work, "Note on the Transmission of Radiant Heat through Gaseous Bodies" was published that year in the Proceedings of the Royal Society, of which he was a fellow.[4][79]

Tyndall gave credit to Claude Pouillet's work on solar radiation through the atmosphere, but appeared to be unaware of Foote's work, or did not think it was relevant.[59][68] Tyndall made no mention of water vapor, carbon dioxide, or climate until his fourth publication on the topic which appeared in the French-language journal Bibliothèque Universelle de Genève in 1859,[80] and even there, did not make a connection with climate change.[81] After conducting further tests, in 1861 his seminal work on climate, "The Bakerian Lecture: On the Absorption and Radiation of Heat by Gases and Vapours, and on the Physical Connexion of Radiation, Absorption, and Conduction" was presented as a lecture to the Royal Society. It was published later that year in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society.[67][80]

"On a New Source of Electrical Excitation"

[edit]

By 1857, Foote was conducting experiments on static electricity, which she called "electrical excitation". The studies were designed to test the moisture content and which gases in the air could generate static electricity.[82] She used an air pump with limited power to adjust the air pressure in a glass tube about two feet long and three inches in diameter and sealed at the ends with brass caps.[83] Attached to one cap was a gold leaf electrometer, which allowed her to measure electrical charges[77] and the other cap was attached to the pump.[83] Vacuuming out the atmospheric air, she replaced it with oxygen, hydrogen, and CO2, as well as dry and damp air to test their effect upon the electrical charge.[77][83] By expanding or compressing air, Foote noted that the moisture content was changed, which in turn affected the amount of static electricity that could be generated. She was working from a hypothesis that electric charges and fluctuations in atmospheric pressure might explain the Earth's magnetic field and polarity, which was later shown by other scientists not to be the case.[84]

Foote's paper, "On a New Source of Electrical Excitation", was again read by Henry at the annual AAAS conference held in Montreal, on the third day of proceedings, August 14, 1857.[82][85] In November 1857, her findings were published in the Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The publication of this paper was the first time an American woman's work in physics had been included in the journal.[71][86] During the nineteenth century, only sixteen physics papers were published by American women. The only two published before 1889 were Foote's 1856 and 1857 papers.[87]

Foote's paper was abbreviated and published in the American Journal of Science and Arts and the Philosophical Magazine. The Philosophical Magazine had rejected publication of her first paper in favor of reprinting Elisha's 1856 work.[82] The article about Foote's findings published in The New-York Daily Times on August 18, 1857,[88][Notes 6] praised her work, claiming that her findings had been "never heretofore proven",[88] although in fact, they confirmed the ideal gas law, published in 1834. She proved that adiabatic heating or cooling, or changes in temperature that occur without the addition or removal of heat, is the result of changing pressure. Temperature changes alter the vapor pressure in the air, which in turn, impacts the generation of static electricity.[89]

Inventions

[edit]
Sketch showing a machine in a box and three different internal mechanisms of it.
Foote's paper-making machine, 1864

Eunice Foote and her husband Elisha were both inventors.[42] Rachel Brazil, a science writer for Chemistry World, noted in 2020 that Elisha filed a patent in 1842 on a thermostatically controlled cooking stove which had been invented by Eunice. According to Brazil, Eunice mostly patented her inventions in her husband's name, because as a married woman, she would not have been able to defend the patents in court.[66] Foote herself acknowledged the practice in 1868, when Stanton visited her at the patent office. She told Stanton that in her opinion half of the patents filed were on inventions by women but because men controlled the money needed to make a model and sought the prestige, they took women's patents out in their own names.[90] In 1857, Elisha was awarded a substantial settlement for infringement on the 1842 stove patent.[71]

Eunice filed a patent in her own name in 1860 on a shoe and boot insert made of a single piece of vulcanized rubber to "prevent the squeaking of boots and shoes".[42][45] A skate that she invented, which did not have straps, was reported in The Emporia News in 1868.[91][Notes 7] In 1864, Eunice developed a new cylinder-type of paper-making machine.[93][94][95] The Daily Evening Star reported that the machine allowed better quality wrapping and printing paper to be manufactured at less cost.[96] A company from Fitchburg, Massachusetts, which used the machine reported that it saved them $157 (equivalent to $2,720 in 2021) per day in raw materials.[94]

Death

[edit]

Foote died on September 29 or 30, 1888, in Lenox, Massachusetts.[4][17][58] She was buried in Green-Wood Cemetery in Brooklyn, New York.[17]

Rediscovery

[edit]

Background

[edit]

Biases against crediting women scientists for their work led to a lack of documentation about her contributions and scientific achievements,[97] and Foote fell into obscurity. Scientists and journalists generally agree that happened because she was a woman and an amateur scientist, and American scientists were then less respected than were Europeans.[98] Her failure to name the specific works of the scientists that had influenced her marked Foote as an amateur.[71][84] American researchers were recognized in her era for natural history, but physics was still a developing field, and few American physicists had an international reputation.[99] Tyndall became the person most often credited with the discovery of the greenhouse effect.[61][71] Some writers credit the greenhouse effect to Svante Arrhenius, the Swedish Nobel laureate in chemistry, who used physical chemistry to calculate how increases in the amount of atmospheric carbon dioxide can cause the Earth to warm and proved that human interaction with the environment was a direct cause of climate change.[71][100][101]

In 1902, Susan B. Anthony made a speech calling on younger feminists to take up the reins from founders of the movement like "Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott, Eunice Newton Foote, Mary Livermore, and Isabella Beecher Hooker."[102] Institutionalized neglect of women's history and distortion of the historical record by historians who did not analyze or include women's experiences led to little being known about early feminists. Before 1960 only thirteen texts published in the United States dealt with women's history. Of those, five focused on colonial women, and three focused on Antebellum Southern women.[103]

Women's liberation activists began making demands for the increased representation of women in academia in the late 1960s.[104][105] They wanted research into women's history to be expanded and for groups such as people of color and other marginalized communities to be part of the historic record.[106] In 1969, those activists formed the Coordinating Committee on Women in the Historical Profession as an affiliate of the American Historical Association, hoping to address historical omissions and eliminate discrimination and recruiting problems in the profession of historians.[107] The push for the inclusion of women as both historical subjects and a field of study for academics resulted in the first university women's studies program being launched in the United States in 1970.[108] The first texts specifically written about first-wave feminists were written after 1975.[103]

Recovery

[edit]

Women scholars began recovering Foote's role as a nineteenth-century scientist in the 1970s.[109] In 1976, historian Sally Gregory Kohlstedt noted Foote's participation as the only woman at the 1857 meeting of the AAAS in her history of that organization.[110] Kohlstedt also noted both Elisha's membership in the AAAS from 1856 to 1860, and Eunice's presentation of papers as a non-member.[111][Notes 8] Deborah Jean Warner mentioned Foote's articles, and her participation in the 1856 and 1857 AAAS conferences, in her article "Science Education for Women in Antebellum America" published in 1978 in the History of Science Society's international journal Isis.[113] Lois Barber Arnold, who taught in the Science Education Department of the Teachers College, Columbia University,[114] described Foote's experiments and participation in the AAAS conferences in detail in 1984, but noted that biographical data on her was lacking.[115][Notes 9] Elizabeth Wagner Reed, a geneticist and scholar who studied biases against women in science,[118] included a chapter "Eunice Newton Foote: 1819–1888" in her 1992 book American Women in Science Before the Civil War.[62][119]

After the advent of the Internet and digitization,[120][121] renewed interest in Foote was sparked by an article published by retired petroleum geologist Ray Sorenson,[6][122] in January 2011, in the American Association of Petroleum Geologists' on-line journal Search and Discovery.[122][123] Katharine Hayhoe, director of the Climate Science Center at Texas Tech University,[124] came across Foote's work when trying to answer a question by a colleague, Patricia Solís, about the lack of women in early climate research.[121][120] She published an article "John v Eunice — A Fascinating Tale of Early Climate Science, Women's Rights and Accidental Poisoning" on Facebook in 2016.[67] Leila McNeill, joint editor-in-chief of the magazine Lady Science, published an article in the Smithsonian magazine in December of that year, after discussing Foote with Sorenson.[61] Around the same time, the physicist John Perlin, who according to Nick Welsh, the executive editor of the Santa Barbara Independent, is an author of two definitive histories on solar energy, took note of Foote and began to research her history.[11] By 2019, and because it was the 200th anniversary of Foote's birth,[18][59] both academics and journalists from many parts of the globe had begun to regularly write about Foote and the sexism and biases in the scientific community, which caused women, and particularly women scientists, to go unrecognized.[125]

Evaluating Foote's experiments

[edit]

Roland Jackson, a visiting scholar at the London-based Royal Institution,[126] set out in 2019 to analyze the questions of priority of Foote's work, as had Hayhoe in 2016.[122][120] According to Jackson and Hayhoe, Foote's simple apparatus could not distinguish between the effects of energy emitted from the sun and infrared energy radiated by the Earth.[63][71][120] Because Tyndall had more sophisticated equipment, Hayhoe noted that he was able to make these distinctions and conclusively measure the "heat-trapping properties" of several gases, by differentiating their infrared energy and the ability of molecules to absorb or emit radiation.[120] Jackson acknowledged that it was possible that Foote did not "recognize, the distinction between solar radiation and radiated heat from the earth".[127] Ralph Lorenz evaluated Foote's work in a modern planetary climate context and noted that the near-infrared (0.8 to 3 μm) radiation absorption reported by Foote is effectively an antigreenhouse effect because it primarily involves solar radiation absorption rather than absorption and re-radiation of terrestrial longwave ('thermal') infrared radiation.[128]

An analysis of both of Foote's papers was published online in 2020 by Joseph D. Ortiz, a geology professor at Kent State University, and Jackson.[129] Their printed findings in 2022 contain a description of Foote's methodology. They pointed out that although she did not cite specific works by other scientists, she referenced de Saussure, Alexander von Humboldt, and Edward Sabine.[84] (Reed had previously noted that Foote had also referenced Henri Becquerel, Jean-Baptiste Biot, and Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac.[77]) They also noted that Foote "did not measure the natural greenhouse effect of the earth's atmosphere", but rather studied the heating of gases inside glass vessels. The walls of these vessels would have blocked longwave infrared radiation from either entering or leaving, while allowing some heat to escape via conduction. Accordingly, her results did not directly indicate how the greenhouse effect operates in a natural atmosphere, but they did provide quantitative information about how gases, including greenhouse gases, absorb and radiate heat.[76]

Ortiz and Jackson's analysis traced the derivation of Foote's ideas and explored how she constructed, carried out, and interpreted her experiments.[130] They found that she conducted her experiments using a control and a test vessel, which were made as similarly as possible. Her experimental design repeated pairing so that she could measure changes between full sun and shadow, vacuumed and condensed air, damp and dry air, and ambient atmosphere and CO2 for each vessel.[131] Although she did not attempt to answer how or why heating occurred, her results confirmed the questions she sought to answer: "Does the concentration of gas in the atmosphere affect its warming response to the Sun's rays?; Does the composition of the gas in the atmosphere affect its warming response to the Sun's rays?; and Can the effect of different gases on the warming response of the Sun's rays be ranked?"[132]

Analysis of Foote's pioneering role in climate science

[edit]

Reed's chapter gave biographical details on Eunice and her family and presented a detailed analysis of her scientific work.[62][119] She recognized that Foote's experiments confirmed that when subjected to sunlight, carbon dioxide became warmer than air "thereby demonstrating what we call the greenhouse effect today".[77] In 2010, when Sorenson came across a summary of Foote's work in an 1857 volume of The Annual of Scientific Discovery, he was unaware that the full paper had been published. He also did not know how much of what publisher David Ames Wells wrote in the summary was "attributable to [Foote]".[133] Sorenson recognized that Foote's work had preceded Tyndall's in making the connection between carbon dioxide and climate change, but believed her lack of recognition for the discovery was that her work had merely been an oral presentation.[29][66][67] He published an update to his initial findings on Foote in 2018, and reported "an examination of the American Journal of Science and Arts (AJS) was conducted, and the original paper [by Foote] was found in the November 1856 issue" ... "The published AJS paper clearly shows that the idea of climate warming due to rising levels of atmospheric CO2 originated with Eunice Foote."[134]

Jackson's work in 2019 confirmed that Foote's experiments showing that water vapor and CO2 absorb heat occurred three years before Tyndall made a similar claim. He also validated that her observation that differences in atmospheric levels of water vapor and CO2 would result in climate change preceded Tyndall's claim by five years.[122] Lorenz reported in 2019 in his work Exploring Planetary Climate that Foote had made her discoveries proving that moist air produced more warming than dry air, and that variances in air density impacted warming, prior to Tyndall.[128] Perlin concurred, describing Foote as "the Rosa Parks of science, ... the first woman to have a paper read at a major scientific meeting ... first woman to have a paper published in the proceedings of a major scientific meeting ... [and] the only woman to be published in serious physics journals until Madame Curie".[135] Ortiz and Jackson concluded that Foote was the first to demonstrate absorption of heat by carbon dioxide and water vapor, but she did not isolate or detect the absorption and emission of radiant energy within the thermal infrared range, which causes the greenhouse effect.[136]

Debate on whether Tyndall knew of Foote's work

[edit]

The rediscovery of Foote also sparked academic debate on whether Tyndall knew of her work. Hayhoe's position in 2018 was that there was inadequate information to make a determination. Perlin strongly believed that Tyndall did know, because one of his papers was published in the 1856 American Journal of Science along with Foote's.[29] Jackson, who also wrote a biography of Tyndall,[6] believes that Tyndall probably never knew of Foote.[100] He acknowledges the possibility that Tyndall could have known, as he was one of the editors of the Philosophical Magazine and could have been involved in the selection of the articles it chose to publish.[70] Jackson also notes that many European scientists, including George Stokes and William Thomson, were unaware of Foote's work since her name is not mentioned in any of the "correspondence, journals, or published papers of the critical physicists" of her era.[81]

Perlin countered Jackson's view because, in an earlier incident, Tyndall had not credited precedent work by Henry and Tyndall was known to have little regard for women's intellectual capacity.[18] Jeff Hecht, a science and technology writer, acknowledged that the reasons why Tyndall did not credit Foote remain unknown but that he "…might have ignored a discovery claimed by a woman". Like Perlin, Hecht pointed out that Tyndall "…failed to credit discoveries by men like Colladon, and quarreled over priority with some other prominent scientists of his time".[71] Jackson rebutted that Tyndall had only limited interest in climate and after 1861, never published again on the subject as his interest was in studying the effect of radiation upon molecules. Jackson stated that it was scientists who gave Tyndall the title of "founder of climate science" and not a title that Tyndall had claimed for himself.[137]

Legacy and recognition

[edit]

In May 2018, a symposium on Foote's work, Science Knows No Gender: In Search of Eunice Foote Who 162 Years Ago Discovered the Principal Cause of Global Warming was held at the University of California, Santa Barbara.[138] The main presenter at the symposium, the first conference specifically organized to honor Foote, was Perlin.[5][11] A short film about Foote's life, Eunice, was produced in 2018 by Eric Garro and Paul Bancilhon.[4] That year, Cornell University Press released a textbook titled Communicating Climate Change: A Guide for Educators, confirming that Foote's work preceded that of Tyndall.[139] The University of California, Santa Barbara Library opened a seven-month exhibit in November 2019, From Eunice Foote to UCSB: A Story of Women, Science, and Climate Change, to honor Foote's work and legacy.[135]

Foote's work is now recognized as the earliest known scientific research to demonstrate the existence of greenhouse gases and their potential to effect changes in climate.[78][127][140] The publication of her paper in the 1856 edition of the American Journal of Science and Arts is acknowledged as the first known publication in a scientific journal on physics by a woman.[71] The publication of her 1857 paper in that year's Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science is acknowledged as the first time an American woman's work had been published in the journal.[71][86] The American Geophysical Union instituted The Eunice Newton Foote Medal for Earth-Life Science in 2022 to recognize exceptional scientific achievements in research that focuses on the convergence of Earth and life science.[141]

In 2025, the ichnotaxon Osspecus eunicefooteae, a fossilised worm burrow from the Cretaceous of the UK, was named in honour of Eunice Foote.[142]

Published works

[edit]
  • Foote, Eunice (September 1856). "Circumstances Affecting the Heat of the Sun's Rays". The American Journal of Science and Arts. 22 (66). New York, New York: G. P. Putnam & Company: 382–383. ISSN 0099-5363. OCLC 1280516952 – via archive.org.
  • Foote, Eunice (August 1857). "On a New Source of Electrical Excitation". Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science: Eleventh Meeting. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Joseph Lovering: 123–126. OCLC 923936325.
  • US patent 28265, Foote, Eunice N., "Filling for Soles of Boots and Shoes", published May 15, 1860 
  • US patent 45149, Foote, Eunice N., "Improvement in Paper-Making Machines", published November 22, 1864 

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Eunice Newton Foote (July 17, 1819 – September 30, 1888) was an American amateur scientist, inventor, and advocate for women's rights. Born in Goshen, Connecticut, she received early education at the Troy Female Seminary in New York before marrying attorney Elisha Foote and relocating to Seneca Falls. Foote's most notable scientific contribution came in 1856 with her paper "Circumstances Affecting the Heat of the Sun's Rays," published in the American Journal of Science, where she reported experiments using glass tubes filled with gases exposed to sunlight and measured with thermometers, finding that carbonic acid gas (carbon dioxide) produced the highest temperature rise due to heightened absorption of solar radiation. This empirical demonstration led her to be the first to hypothesize that increased atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide could warm the planet, although her work did not address absorption of infrared radiation from the Earth's surface which is central to the greenhouse effect's mechanism, and recent research shows increased solar absorption by the atmosphere causes surface cooling rather than warming. As a women's rights activist, Foote was an editorial committee member at the 1848 Seneca Falls Convention and affixed her signature as the fifth endorser to the Declaration of Sentiments, which asserted equal rights for women modeled on the Declaration of Independence. She also pursued practical innovations, securing patents in her name for a rubber filling to quiet shoe soles in 1860 and an improvement in paper-making machines in 1864, while contributing to her husband's inventions such as a thermostatically controlled stove. Foote's multifaceted pursuits reflected the constraints and opportunities for intellectual women in 19th-century America, though her scientific work faded from prominence until rediscovered in the late 20th century.

Early Life and Background

Childhood and Family Origins

Eunice Newton was born on July 17, 1819, in Goshen, Connecticut, to Isaac Newton Jr., a farmer, and Thirza Newton. She was the youngest of at least eleven children in a farming family facing financial challenges. Shortly after her birth, the family relocated to Ontario County in western New York State, settling on a farm near East Bloomfield where the soil supported more productive agriculture than in Connecticut. Eunice grew up in this rural environment amid the demands of farm life, which involved cattle rearing and land management by her father.

Education and Intellectual Formation

Eunice Newton Foote's early education occurred in New York state following her family's relocation from Connecticut, where she was born in 1819, though specific details of primary schooling remain limited in historical records. As a young woman, she attended the Troy Female Seminary in Troy, New York, from approximately 1836 to 1838, an institution renowned as one of the first in the United States to offer women advanced instruction beyond basic academics. The curriculum there encompassed foundational sciences, including chemistry and biology, alongside history, literature, philosophy, and mathematics, fostering analytical skills applicable to empirical inquiry. Foote also participated in classes at the Rensselaer School—later Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute—around ages 17 to 19, receiving practical exposure to scientific methods and theories in a setting that emphasized experimentation. This dual enrollment provided her with a rare breadth of scientific training for a woman of her time, though no records indicate pursuit of higher formal credentials beyond secondary levels. These experiences cultivated her capacity for independent scientific reasoning, evident in her subsequent amateur pursuits, without reliance on institutional affiliations typical of male contemporaries. Her intellectual development reflected the era's emerging opportunities for women's education in progressive institutions, which encouraged curiosity-driven learning over rote memorization, aligning with the self-reliant approach she later applied to natural philosophy. While direct evidence of extensive personal reading in scientific texts is scarce, the pedagogical emphasis on practical science at Troy and Rensselaer likely spurred her engagement with accessible works on physics and chemistry, shaping an empirical mindset unencumbered by advanced academic dogma.

Personal and Social Engagements

Marriage and Family Life

Eunice Newton married Elisha Foote, a lawyer serving as judge on the East Bloomfield circuit in western New York and an inventor with interests in patent law, on August 12, 1841. The couple initially resided in Seneca Falls, New York, where Elisha practiced law and pursued mechanical inventions, establishing a household that reflected mutual intellectual inclinations. Their marriage produced two daughters: Mary Foote, born in 1842, and Augusta Foote, born in 1844. Elisha's professional stability as a judge and patent specialist afforded the family financial security, enabling a domestic environment conducive to personal endeavors amid the era's economic constraints on women. This setup paralleled Elisha's own inventive activities, such as patent applications for mechanical improvements, which mirrored aspects of Eunice's later practical pursuits without direct collaboration. Following Elisha's death in 1883, Eunice maintained residences partly in Lenox, Massachusetts, where she spent her final years until her death in 1888, continuing family ties through her daughters amid a reduced household.

Participation in Women's Rights Advocacy

Eunice Newton Foote attended the Seneca Falls Convention, the first women's rights convention, held on July 19–20, 1848, in Seneca Falls, New York. She signed the Declaration of Sentiments, a document modeled on the Declaration of Independence that asserted women's equality in rights such as suffrage, property ownership, and education, listing grievances against legal and social inequalities. Foote's name appears as the fifth among the 68 female signatories, followed by her husband Elisha Foote among the 32 male signers. Foote's involvement extended through her friendship with Elizabeth Cady Stanton, a key organizer of the convention and author of the Declaration, with whom she resided nearby in Seneca Falls. This association facilitated her participation, though no records indicate she assumed leadership roles or delivered speeches at the event. Her advocacy efforts appear limited to this prominent signing and attendance, without evidence of subsequent convention participation, published writings on the subject, or organized campaigns. Foote's engagement in women's rights reflected the broader 19th-century reform movements intersecting abolitionism and temperance, yet it did not overshadow her parallel pursuits in science and invention. The Seneca Falls document advocated specific reforms like equal guardianship of children and removal of property restrictions for married women, aligning with contemporaneous legal inequities.

Scientific Investigations

Experimental Setup and 1856 Solar Heat Experiments

Eunice Foote's research on solar heat absorption was presented on August 23, 1856, at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Albany, New York, though the paper was communicated by physicist Joseph Henry rather than delivered by Foote herself. The work appeared later that year in the American Journal of Science and Arts under the title "Circumstances Affecting the Heat of the Sun's Rays." Foote employed a simple apparatus consisting of two glass cylinders, each approximately 4 inches in diameter and 30 inches long, fitted with thermometers and connected to an air pump for controlling gas pressure and composition. She tested various gases, including common air (both dry and moist), carbonic acid gas (carbon dioxide, CO₂), hydrogen, oxygen, and even a vacuum condition achieved by rarefaction. In the procedure, Foote exposed the cylinders to direct sunlight, recording thermometer readings at intervals of 2 to 3 minutes over periods ranging from 8 to 18 minutes, while also noting temperatures in shaded conditions for comparison. She varied factors such as gas density by using the air pump to compress or rarefy the contents, and moisture levels in air samples. Key empirical findings included greater temperature rises with increased gas density and reduced heating under rarefied conditions or vacuum. Moist air heated more than dry air, and among pure gases, carbonic acid gas exhibited the strongest absorptive effect. Specific maximum temperatures attained under sunlight were as follows:
GasMaximum Temperature (°F)
Hydrogen104
Common air106
Oxygen108
Carbonic acid gas (CO₂)125
Foote concluded that carbonic acid gas absorbs heat from solar rays more effectively than other tested substances, suggesting that an atmosphere richer in this gas would result in higher planetary temperatures and advancing this as a possible explanation for warmer periods in Earth's geological past when such gas was more abundant. Contrary to her hypothesis, recent research shows increased solar absorption by the atmosphere causes surface cooling rather than warming; higher carbon dioxide concentrations do cause higher planetary temperatures, but this is due to CO2's selective absorption of infrared radiation and transmission of solar radiation rather than its absorption of solar radiation.

1857 Electrical Excitation Research

In 1857, Eunice Foote published her second scientific paper, titled "On a New Source of Electrical Excitation," in the Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The work described experiments aimed at identifying novel mechanisms for generating static electricity, distinct from her prior investigations into solar heat absorption. Foote focused on frictional excitation produced by mechanical motion, employing glass tubes filled with air or other gases that were rotated rapidly to induce electrostatic charges. Foote's setup demonstrated that rapid motion of air within the tubes, particularly in rarefied conditions, yielded significant electrical excitation, manifesting as observable sparks and charge accumulation. She noted that compression or expansion of atmospheric air during these processes enhanced the effect, with variations influenced by gaseous composition and moisture content; for instance, drier air or specific gas mixtures produced stronger charges compared to humid or unmodified samples. These empirical findings highlighted a pressure-driven dynamic in static electricity generation, predating more formalized studies of triboelectric effects in fluids, though Foote provided qualitative observations rather than quantitative measurements. This research represented Foote's brief foray into electrostatics, likely prompted by contemporaneous interest in frictional electricity among American scientists, but it received limited attention and lacked subsequent elaboration by Foote herself. The paper's brevity—spanning pages 123–126—and absence of follow-up experiments suggest it was a one-off empirical exploration, aligning with the era's rudimentary instrumentation for such phenomena.

Inventions and Practical Applications

Eunice Newton Foote secured U.S. Patent No. 28,265 on May 15, 1860, for a filling made from a single piece of vulcanized rubber intended to insert into the soles of boots and shoes to eliminate squeaking noises caused by friction. This device addressed a mundane yet persistent issue in 19th-century footwear, leveraging emerging vulcanization techniques for durability without requiring complex assembly. Four years later, Foote obtained U.S. Patent No. 45,149 on November 22, 1864, for an improvement in paper-making machines that incorporated specialized rollers, screens, and pulp distribution mechanisms to streamline the formation of continuous paper sheets. The design aimed to increase production efficiency and reduce costs for papermakers, particularly in printing applications, by minimizing waste and enhancing sheet uniformity. However, historical records provide no indication of widespread commercialization or significant industrial adoption for either invention. These patents demonstrate Foote's aptitude for mechanical innovation tailored to everyday practical needs, such as apparel maintenance and manufacturing processes, rather than advancing theoretical scientific principles. Unlike her contemporaneous experiments on solar heat absorption and electrical excitation, her inventive pursuits lacked empirical documentation of broader applications or economic viability, aligning with contemporaneous trends in domestic and small-scale engineering by women inventors.

Critical Assessment of Contributions

Methodological Strengths and Empirical Findings

Eunice Foote's 1856 experiments utilized a simple yet effective apparatus comprising two horizontal glass cylinders, each approximately 30 inches long and 4 inches in diameter, fitted with thermometers and connected to an air pump for gas manipulation. This setup enabled the isolation of individual gas effects by alternately evacuating one cylinder to create a vacuum and compressing gases into the other, then exposing them to direct sunlight while monitoring temperature changes with mercury-in-glass thermometers. The design's strength lay in its minimalism, relying on direct thermal measurements to demonstrate differential absorption without complex instrumentation, thereby ensuring reproducibility through basic observational techniques. Foote systematically tested atmospheric air (both rarefied and dense), moist air, carbonic acid gas (CO₂), and hydrogen, recording the temperature elevations after solar exposure. Her empirical observations revealed that carbonic acid gas produced the highest temperature rise—exceeding that of dry air by notable margins—indicating superior absorption of solar radiation compared to other tested gases. This marked the earliest documented experimentation specifically targeting CO₂'s interaction with solar heat, predating advanced quantitative methods like spectroscopy. Foote's approach highlighted the viability of empirical testing with accessible tools to uncover causal relationships in heat retention, contributing verifiable data on gas-specific thermal behaviors observable under natural solar conditions.

Limitations in Scope and Precision

Foote's experiments primarily assessed the absorption of incoming solar radiation—predominantly shortwave visible and ultraviolet light—by various gases, as the glass cylinders used transmitted these wavelengths while blocking longer-wave infrared radiation. This setup captured direct heating effects but did not replicate or measure the re-emission of infrared radiation from a warmed surface, which constitutes the core mechanism of the atmospheric greenhouse effect. Without spectroscopy or a controlled infrared source, the work remained confined to qualitative observations of temperature elevation under natural sunlight, precluding differentiation between absorption spectra across wavelengths. The amateur apparatus, consisting of two 4-inch-diameter by 30-inch-long glass cylinders fitted with thermometers and an air pump for gas introduction, introduced inherent imprecisions. Gas purity was unquantified, with carbon dioxide generated and added to ambient air without purification steps, potentially incorporating contaminants that influenced thermal outcomes. Sunlight exposure varied with environmental conditions, as cylinders were placed in direct sun for short durations of 8 to 18 minutes, with readings taken every 2 to 3 minutes, yielding temperatures reported to the nearest degree Fahrenheit (e.g., 125°F for CO₂ versus 106°F for common air) but without reaching thermal equilibrium or calibration against standards. These factors rendered results qualitative rather than suitable for quantitative atmospheric modeling, as pressure, concentration, and radiant flux were not systematically controlled. Foote's inference that elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide would enhance planetary warming lacked empirical quantification of gas concentrations, heat retention, partial pressures, radiative forcing, or interactions with other variables like water vapor saturation. Her inference was based on a more CO₂-dense atmosphere absorbing more sunlight and leading to warming, contradicting the physical effect whereby increased atmospheric absorption of solar radiation reduces surface insolation and causes surface cooling rather than warming. This underdeveloped framework, derived from isolated trials and an erroneous premise, could not support precise estimations of temperature changes from altered CO₂ levels, as contemporary knowledge of trace gas abundances and radiative transfer was absent.

Comparisons with John Tyndall and Other Contemporaries

John Tyndall's experiments on the absorption of radiant heat by gases, commencing in the spring of 1859 and reported to the Royal Society that May, employed a controlled setup with a heat source such as a Leslie cube emitting infrared radiation, through which gases flowed in long brass tubes; absorption was quantified via a thermopile connected to a galvanometer, measuring deflections proportional to intercepted heat rays. In contrast, Eunice Foote's 1856 investigation used glass cylinders filled with gases like carbon dioxide, exposed directly to sunlight, with temperature rises gauged by inserted thermometers after shading, yielding qualitative observations of elevated heating in CO2 and moist air without instrumental quantification of absorption spectra. Tyndall's approach thus isolated infrared components absent in Foote's broadband solar exposure, enabling precise determination of selective absorption coefficients for CO2, water vapor, and hydrocarbons, while Foote's remained empirical without differentiation of wavelength-specific effects. Tyndall integrated his findings with Joseph Fourier's 1824 theoretical framework positing atmospheric retention of terrestrial heat, extending it through experimental validation of variable gas absorptivities influencing climate; Foote's work, by comparison, lacked such theoretical anchoring, deriving solely from observed solar heating differentials. No records indicate Tyndall referenced or was aware of Foote's American Journal of Science publication, as his citations emphasized European predecessors like Claude Pouillet's solar radiation measurements, reflecting the era's transatlantic scientific silos and Foote's limited institutional access. Earlier contemporaries such as Horace-Bénédict de Saussure, in experiments from the 1760s onward, demonstrated solar heat trapping via insulated boxes yielding temperatures up to 110°C under focused sunlight—predating both Foote and Tyndall—but focused on material enclosures rather than gas-specific absorptions, serving more as foundational solar concentrator designs than atmospheric mechanism probes. Tyndall's subsequent refinements, including dispersion prisms to resolve absorption bands by 1861, surpassed these and Foote's static setups in establishing quantifiable, mechanistic foundations for gaseous radiative transfer. Foote holds chronological precedence in empirically linking CO2 to enhanced solar retention, although enhanced infrared retention is the property that drives the greenhouse effect.

Later Years and Death

Post-Scientific Activities

Following the publication of her 1857 paper on electrical excitation, Eunice Newton Foote did not issue further scientific research, marking a cessation of her contributions to formal scientific literature. She resided primarily in New York, attending to family matters amid the era's societal constraints on women's public roles, which included limited access to scientific institutions and professional networks dominated by men. Foote's domestic focus intensified after the 1847 death of one daughter, with her energies directed toward her surviving child, Mary Foote Henderson, and extended family obligations. Upon Elisha Foote's death on October 22, 1883, in St. Louis, Missouri, she alternated between residences in Brooklyn, New York—near family ties—and Lenox, Massachusetts, engaging in private rather than public pursuits. This withdrawal aligned with broader barriers for 19th-century women scientists, who faced exclusion from bodies like the American Association for the Advancement of Science's full membership until later decades, prompting many to limit activities to informal or inventive domains absent institutional backing. No records indicate Foote sought academic affiliations or re-entered scientific forums, reflecting both personal choice and systemic impediments to sustained female participation in empirical inquiry.

Circumstances of Death

Eunice Newton Foote died on September 30, 1888, in Lenox, Massachusetts, at the age of 69. Her remains were interred in the family mausoleum at Green-Wood Cemetery in Brooklyn, New York. Historical records document no engagement in scientific experimentation, patent applications, or women's rights activities during the decade preceding her death, reflecting a period of relative seclusion following her husband's passing in 1883. A brief obituary appeared in the New-York Tribune on October 2, 1888, noting her demise without detailing circumstances or cause, which remains unspecified in vital records and contemporary accounts.

Rediscovery and Scholarly Reappraisal

Historical Obscurity and 2011 Rediscovery

Foote's 1856 findings on the heat-absorbing properties of carbonic acid gas, published in the American Journal of Science and Arts, received scant notice after their initial presentation to the American Association for the Advancement of Science on August 23, 1856. The journal's readership was predominantly American, with limited distribution and influence in Europe, where subsequent research on atmospheric heat absorption—such as John Tyndall's experiments beginning in 1859—dominated scientific discourse. Foote conducted no further documented experiments or publications on the topic, and her work was neither cited nor built upon in 19th-century literature on radiative properties of gases, contributing to its eclipse amid the era's transatlantic disparities in scientific infrastructure and communication. This obscurity persisted into the 20th century, with Foote's contributions unmentioned in historical accounts of greenhouse effect research, including those focusing on Tyndall's contemporaneous validations using more precise instrumentation. Her paper remained buried in archival volumes, overlooked amid the prioritization of European-led advancements in spectroscopy and thermodynamics. In January 2011, retired petroleum geologist Ray Sorenson identified and analyzed Foote's paper through a targeted archival review, publishing a detailed reconstruction of her experiments in the American Association of Petroleum Geologists' Search and Discovery series. This prompted wider scholarly retrieval, with coverage in outlets such as Scientific American (2016 onward) and The New York Times (April 2020), highlighting the paper's pre-Tyndall timeline. The rediscovery spurred institutional responses, including a 2019 exhibit at the University of California, Santa Barbara's History of Climate Science Museum, and biographical studies emphasizing her role in early empirical investigations of solar heat retention.

Evaluations of Experimental Validity

Modern scholarly analyses have confirmed the reproducibility of Foote's core observation that carbon dioxide absorbs solar radiation more effectively than ordinary air, resulting in elevated temperatures within her glass cylinders exposed to sunlight. In her setup, the tube filled with carbon dioxide reached 125°F, compared to 106°F for air, a differential attributable to the gas's absorption properties. Researchers Ortiz and Jackson, modeling her data with logarithmic fits accounting for cylinder geometry and solar irradiance, estimated a warming effect consistent with her measurements, validating the qualitative empirical robustness for the mid-19th-century context despite limitations in thermometer accuracy and gas purity control. However, the experiments primarily demonstrated absorption in the visible and near-infrared portions of the solar spectrum, as the glass enclosures blocked longwave infrared radiation emitted by the heated gases or surfaces—key to the full atmospheric greenhouse mechanism. This omission meant Foote's work did not probe the infrared trapping central to modern climate understanding, and short exposure durations prevented steady-state equilibrium measurements. Foote's approach, employing a simple paired-tube design with an air pump for gas isolation, exhibits sound causal reasoning without pseudoscientific flaws, distinguishing it as a legitimate preliminary investigation into atmospheric heat retention. However, Foote demonstrated and made hypotheses based on carbon dioxide's properties of solar absorption rather than infrared absorption. Recent research shows increased solar absorption by the atmosphere causes surface cooling rather than warming. The empirical foundation thus does not support her stated reasons for elevated carbon dioxide causing warmer planetary temperatures, and underscores the need for subsequent advancements, as pursued by Tyndall, to build accurate theories and comprehensive models.

Debates on Priority and Influence Over Tyndall

Historians have debated whether John Tyndall was aware of Eunice Foote's 1856 findings on the differential heating effects of gases under sunlight, with most evidence indicating independent discovery rather than direct influence. Tyndall's extensive publications on atmospheric heat absorption, beginning with experiments in 1859 and culminating in his 1861 paper in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, cite European predecessors such as Jean-Baptiste Joseph Fourier and Horace Bénédict de Saussure but make no reference to Foote's work in the American Journal of Science and Arts or the associated American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) proceedings. No surviving correspondence, notebooks, or contemporary accounts document Tyndall's knowledge of American scientific journals from 1856, despite his broad reading in physics; his research trajectory aligns with ongoing British and continental inquiries into radiant heat, predating Foote's publication by years in conceptual foundations. Claims of potential influence rest on speculation about transatlantic circulation of scientific literature. Proponents argue that AAAS proceedings, which included an abstract of Foote's presentation from August 1856, could have reached European audiences through international exchanges, and note Tyndall's later collaborations with American scientists. However, archival analysis reveals no direct evidence of Tyndall accessing these specific volumes, and his experimental focus shifted to infrared radiation absorption using a thermopile and Leslie's cube—distinct from Foote's sunlight-exposed glass tubes—building explicitly on Fourier's 1824 radiative equilibrium theory rather than any American antecedent. Tyndall's quantitative precision, including identification of selective absorption spectra for water vapor and carbon dioxide, advanced beyond Foote's qualitative temperature observations, underscoring methodological independence. Scholarly consensus, as articulated in peer-reviewed historical reviews, favors Tyndall's unawareness of Foote's paper, attributing the overlap to convergent scientific inquiry amid 19th-century advances in spectroscopy and thermodynamics. This pattern mirrors other simultaneous discoveries, such as those in electromagnetism, without implying plagiarism or deliberate omission. Critiques of narratives emphasizing Foote's "priority" argue they sometimes overstate her precedence to highlight gender biases in historical recognition, potentially undervaluing Tyndall's systematic quantification and influence on subsequent climate theory, including by Svante Arrhenius in 1896. Such debates underscore the challenges of attributing causality in pre-institutionalized science but affirm that Foote's obscurity stemmed more from her limited output and amateur status than from Tyndall's supposed suppression.

Modern Recognition and Critiques of Narrative Overemphasis

Following her 2011 rediscovery, Eunice Newton Foote received formal honors from scientific societies, including the establishment of the Eunice Newton Foote Medal for Earth-Life Science by the American Geophysical Union in 2022, awarded annually to senior scientists for exceptional research achievements at the intersection of Earth and life sciences. Her experiments have been cautiously incorporated into historical accounts of climate science, such as NOAA's 2019 commemoration of her bicentennial, highlighting her early empirical observation of carbon dioxide's solar absorptive properties without attributing foundational theoretical development to her. However, designations like "mother of climate science" applied to Foote in some popular narratives overstate her contributions, as her 1856 experiments provided a qualitative demonstration of carbon dioxide absorbing solar heat but lacked quantitative precision, differentiation between visible and infrared radiation, or causal linkages to atmospheric composition changes and global warming risks—elements systematically advanced by John Tyndall's subsequent work on gaseous absorption spectra and climate variability. Tyndall's rigorous measurements and theoretical integrations, including identification of water vapor and carbon dioxide as key variable absorbers, established the mechanistic foundations for later climate models, rendering Foote's role inspirational in the modern day rather than theoretically pivotal in the historical scientific progression. The post-rediscovery emphasis on Foote risks politicized reinterpretations that prioritize identity-based narratives—such as systemic gender exclusion—over evidentiary assessment, despite records showing her paper's publication in the American Journal of Science and its summary by Joseph Henry, indicating initial visibility rather than suppression. Such framings, common in media and advocacy contexts, can dilute focus on empirical hierarchies, where Tyndall's causal experimentation propelled the field beyond Foote's isolated work, underscoring the need for recognition grounded in scientific impact rather than revisionist symbolism.

Published Works and Archival Record

Eunice Newton Foote's published scientific output consisted of two papers. Her initial work, "Circumstances Affecting the Heat of the Sun's Rays," was printed in the American Journal of Science and Arts, second series, volume 22, pages 382–388, in November 1856. This four-page article described experiments using glass cylinders, thermometers, and an air pump to test heat retention by gases including carbonic acid gas (carbon dioxide) under sunlight exposure. The paper originated from a presentation at the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in Albany, New York, on August 23, 1856, read by Professor Joseph Henry on her behalf. Foote's second publication, "On a New Source of Electrical Excitation," appeared in the Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science for 1857, pages 123–126. This paper examined static electricity generated by compressing or expanding atmospheric air using a pump and electrometer, noting positive charges from compression and negative from rarefaction. It too was presented at an AAAS conference in Montreal and read by Joseph Henry. Foote produced no books or additional peer-reviewed articles, limiting her corpus to these concise experimental reports. Foote secured multiple U.S. patents for practical inventions. These included Patent 28,265 for "Filling for Soles of Boots and Shoes," granted May 15, 1860; Patent 45,149 for a paper-making machine, granted November 22, 1864; and Patent 124,944 for an "Improvement in Driers," granted March 26, 1872, co-invented with Marshall P. Smith. These patents, documented in the U.S. Patent Office records, reflect her inventive pursuits in manufacturing and consumer goods rather than scientific theory. Archival materials related to Foote include her signature on the Declaration of Sentiments from the 1848 Seneca Falls Convention, preserved in historical collections documenting early women's rights efforts. Family papers and personal correspondence remain limited and primarily accessible through digitized journal excerpts and patent files following scholarly interest in the 2010s, enabling verification of her original experimental claims. Original manuscripts of her papers are not widely held in public archives but are reproduced from period journals now available online via academic and public domain repositories.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.