Community hub
Recent from talks
Knowledge base stats:
Talk channels stats:
Members stats:
Jus ad bellum
Jus ad bellum (/juːs/ YOOS or /dʒʌs/), literally "right to war" in Latin, refers to "the conditions under which States may resort to war or to the use of armed force in general". Jus ad bellum is one pillar of just war theory. Just war theory states that war should only be condoned under 'just' conditions. Jus ad bellum simply limits the causes for which war can be considered justifiable. The other parts of just war theory include jus in bello (just actions in war) and jus post bellum (justice after war).
The history of jus ad bellum dates back to early religious and philosophical ideas. There are references to the idea of morally fought wars dating back to ancient civilizations. Thousands of years later, these ideas still stand in today's society.
Many of the ancient civilizations have shown some degree of understanding of just war. One example can be found in Ancient Egypt. Early Egyptians viewed themselves as the cosmological center of civility. Therefore they put their faith in the gods alongside the pharaoh to have just reasons to engage in war. These include self defense, defense of their allies and against evil powers. Beyond the Egyptians, there have also been tracings of these core just war and jus ad bellum elements in Ancient Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Levant and Hatti.
Many philosophers in the early centuries have dabbled in defining what is ethically and morally acceptable in war. However, St. Augustine is considered to be the father of just war theory. St. Augustine was a Nicene Christian who constructed the idea from a Christian perspective. He is the credited founder of the term jus ad bellum itself. Later came philosopher St. Thomas Aquinas with his Summa Theologiae. Aquinas lists criteria from the Christian perspective that were intended to protect civilians and guarantee that wars were not just fought for the interest of private parties.
Francisco de Vitoria and Hugo Grotius grew the idea of just war theory into international law. Vitoria's main argument presented that war should serve the common good. States should not be going to war for revenge or power. Hugo Grotius was another key thinker within the evolution of just war. He has been named father of international law. In his work, On the Law of War and Peace, Grotius emphasized the need for proportionality and accountability.
Today organizations such as League of Nations and United Nations stand to prevent unjust wars. The League of Nations was one of the first international organizations established with a primary goal of maintaining world peace. It was established in 1920 after World War I in order to protect the world from dealing with such tragedies again. Unfortunately, it was entirely unsuccessful in that mission owing to the occurrence of World War II. Thus the United Nations was born. In the UN Charter, Article 2, paragraph 4 states: "All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations." Article 51 of the UN Charter later clarifies: "Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations." These put the idea of jus ad bellum into writing by requiring states to agree that they will only use armed force in self-defense, or with the approval of the United Nations Security Council.
Since the 1950s, declarations of jus ad bellum have dropped dramatically. In "Why States No Longer Declare War" Tanisha Fazal notes the drop in formal declarations of war since the 1950s. This may be as a result of the nuance of war in modern times, given the rise of non-state actors such as terrorist groups.
One of the more recent topics being discussed in scholarship is the application of international law in the realm of cyberspace. As cyber attacks continue to increase across the globe, a conversation needs to be had about the jurisdiction of cyber crimes. When is the use of force justified in these uncharted spaces?
Hub AI
Jus ad bellum AI simulator
(@Jus ad bellum_simulator)
Jus ad bellum
Jus ad bellum (/juːs/ YOOS or /dʒʌs/), literally "right to war" in Latin, refers to "the conditions under which States may resort to war or to the use of armed force in general". Jus ad bellum is one pillar of just war theory. Just war theory states that war should only be condoned under 'just' conditions. Jus ad bellum simply limits the causes for which war can be considered justifiable. The other parts of just war theory include jus in bello (just actions in war) and jus post bellum (justice after war).
The history of jus ad bellum dates back to early religious and philosophical ideas. There are references to the idea of morally fought wars dating back to ancient civilizations. Thousands of years later, these ideas still stand in today's society.
Many of the ancient civilizations have shown some degree of understanding of just war. One example can be found in Ancient Egypt. Early Egyptians viewed themselves as the cosmological center of civility. Therefore they put their faith in the gods alongside the pharaoh to have just reasons to engage in war. These include self defense, defense of their allies and against evil powers. Beyond the Egyptians, there have also been tracings of these core just war and jus ad bellum elements in Ancient Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Levant and Hatti.
Many philosophers in the early centuries have dabbled in defining what is ethically and morally acceptable in war. However, St. Augustine is considered to be the father of just war theory. St. Augustine was a Nicene Christian who constructed the idea from a Christian perspective. He is the credited founder of the term jus ad bellum itself. Later came philosopher St. Thomas Aquinas with his Summa Theologiae. Aquinas lists criteria from the Christian perspective that were intended to protect civilians and guarantee that wars were not just fought for the interest of private parties.
Francisco de Vitoria and Hugo Grotius grew the idea of just war theory into international law. Vitoria's main argument presented that war should serve the common good. States should not be going to war for revenge or power. Hugo Grotius was another key thinker within the evolution of just war. He has been named father of international law. In his work, On the Law of War and Peace, Grotius emphasized the need for proportionality and accountability.
Today organizations such as League of Nations and United Nations stand to prevent unjust wars. The League of Nations was one of the first international organizations established with a primary goal of maintaining world peace. It was established in 1920 after World War I in order to protect the world from dealing with such tragedies again. Unfortunately, it was entirely unsuccessful in that mission owing to the occurrence of World War II. Thus the United Nations was born. In the UN Charter, Article 2, paragraph 4 states: "All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations." Article 51 of the UN Charter later clarifies: "Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations." These put the idea of jus ad bellum into writing by requiring states to agree that they will only use armed force in self-defense, or with the approval of the United Nations Security Council.
Since the 1950s, declarations of jus ad bellum have dropped dramatically. In "Why States No Longer Declare War" Tanisha Fazal notes the drop in formal declarations of war since the 1950s. This may be as a result of the nuance of war in modern times, given the rise of non-state actors such as terrorist groups.
One of the more recent topics being discussed in scholarship is the application of international law in the realm of cyberspace. As cyber attacks continue to increase across the globe, a conversation needs to be had about the jurisdiction of cyber crimes. When is the use of force justified in these uncharted spaces?