Hubbry Logo
Louis Le PrinceLouis Le PrinceMain
Open search
Louis Le Prince
Community hub
Louis Le Prince
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Louis Le Prince
Louis Le Prince
from Wikipedia

Louis Aimé Augustin Le Prince (French: [lwi l(ə) pʁɛ̃s]; 28 August 1841 – disappeared 16 September 1890; declared dead 16 September 1897) was a French artist and the inventor of an early motion-picture camera, and director of Roundhay Garden Scene. He was possibly the first person to shoot a moving picture sequence using a single lens camera and a strip of (paper) film.[1][2] He has been credited as the "Father of Cinematography"[3] but, due to his disappearance in 1890, his work did not influence the commercial development of cinema.[4][5]

Key Information

In October 1888, Le Prince filmed moving-picture sequences of family members in Leeds,[6] in the 1888 short film Roundhay Garden Scene, and of his son Louis playing the accordion, using his single-lens camera and Eastman's paper negative film.[7] In the next eighteen months, he also made a film of Leeds Bridge. His work appears to precede the inventions of his contemporaries, such as Friese-Greene and Donisthorpe as well as being years ahead of the Lumière brothers and Dickson (who did the moving image work for Thomas Edison). Le Prince disappeared on 16 September 1890.[1] Numerous conspiracy theories emerged about his disappearance, including murder, disappearance in order to start a new life, and suicide. However, no conclusive evidence was found for any of these theories.

In early 1890, Edison workers had begun experimenting with celluloid film to capture moving images. The first public results of these experiments were shown in May 1891.[8] Le Prince's widow and son, Adolphe, were keen to advance Louis's cause as the inventor of cinematography. In 1898, Adolphe appeared as a witness for the defence in a court case brought by Thomas Edison against the American Mutoscope Company, in which Edison claimed to be the first and sole inventor of cinematography, and thus entitled to royalties for the use of the process. Film shot with cameras built according to Le Prince's patent were presented. Eventually, the court ruled in Edison's favour, however, a year later that ruling was overturned,[8] but Edison reissued his patents and succeeded in controlling the US film industry for many years.[8]

Seven years after his disappearance, Le Prince was declared dead on 16 September 1897.

Early life and education

[edit]

Le Prince was born on 28 August 1841 in Metz.[9][10] His family referred to him as "Augustin" and English-speaking friends would later call him "Gus".[11] Le Prince's father was a major of artillery in the French Army[12] and an officer of the Légion d'honneur. When growing up, he reportedly spent time in the studio of his father's friend, the pioneer of photography Louis Daguerre,[12] from whom Le Prince may have received some lessons on photography and chemistry before he was 10 years old. His education went on to include the study of painting in Paris and post-graduate chemistry at Leipzig University,[12] which provided him with the academic knowledge he was to utilise in the future.

Career

[edit]
Le Prince in the 1880s

In conclusion, I would say that Mr. Le Prince was in many ways a very extraordinary man, apart from his inventive genius, which was undoubtedly great. He stood 6ft. 3in. or 4in. (190cm) in his stockings, well built in proportion, and he was most gentle and considerate and, though an inventor, of an extremely placid disposition which nothing appeared to ruffle.

— Declaration of Frederic Mason (wood-worker and assistant of Le Prince, April 21, 1931, American consulate of Bradford, England)

Le Prince moved to Leeds, England in 1866, after being invited to join John Whitley,[1] a friend introduced by a former university lecturer, in Whitley Partners of Hunslet, a firm of brass founders making valves and components.[13][14] In 1869 he married Sarah Elizabeth Whitley, John's sister[1] and a talented artist. When in Paris during their honeymoon, Le Prince repeatedly visited a magic show, fascinated by an illusion with moving transparent figures, presumably a dancing skeleton projection at the Théâtre Robert-Houdin with multiple reflections of mirrors focused on one point or a variation of Pepper's Ghost.[15]

Le Prince and his wife started a school of applied art, the Leeds Technical School of Art,[16] and became well renowned for their work in fixing coloured photographs on to metal and pottery, leading to them being commissioned for portraits of Queen Victoria and the long-serving prime minister William Gladstone produced in this way; these were included alongside other mementos of the time in a time capsule—manufactured by Whitley Partners of Hunslet—which was placed in the foundations of Cleopatra's Needle on the embankment of the River Thames.[citation needed]

In 1881, Le Prince went to the United States[12] as an agent for Lincrusta Walton, staying in the country along with his family once his contract had ended.[4] He became the manager for a small group of French artists who produced large panoramas, usually of famous battles, that were exhibited in New York City, Washington, D.C. and Chicago.[12][13]

During this time he began experiments relating to the production of 'moving' photographs, designing a camera that utilised sixteen lenses,[13] which was the first invention he patented. Although the camera was capable of 'capturing' motion, it wasn't a complete success because each lens photographed the subject from a slightly different viewpoint and thus the image would have jumped about, if he had been able to project it (which is unknown).

Plaque on Leeds Bridge

After his return to Leeds in May 1887,[13] Le Prince built a single-lens camera in mid-late 1888. An experimental model was developed in a workshop at 160 Woodhouse Lane, Leeds and used to shoot his motion-picture films. It was first used on 14 October 1888 to shoot what would become known as Roundhay Garden Scene and a sequence of his son Adolphe playing the accordion. Le Prince later used it to film road traffic and pedestrians crossing Leeds Bridge. The film was shot from Hicks the Ironmongers, now the British Waterways building on the south east side of the bridge[1] and marked with a commemorative Blue plaque.

Disappearance

[edit]

In September 1890, Le Prince was preparing for a trip to the United States, supposedly to publicly premiere his work and join his wife and children. Before this journey, he decided to return to France to visit his brother in Dijon. Then, on 16 September, he took a train to Paris, but having taken a later train than planned, his friends in Paris discovered that he was not on board. He was never seen again by his family or friends, nor was the luggage he was traveling with ever found.[1] The last person to see Le Prince at the Dijon station was his brother.[17] The French police, Scotland Yard and the family undertook exhaustive searches, but never found him. Le Prince was officially declared dead in 1897.[18] A number of mostly unsubstantiated theories have been proposed.

Patent Wars assassination, "Equity 6928"

[edit]

Christopher Rawlence pursues the assassination theory, along with other theories, and discusses the Le Prince family's suspicions of Edison over patents (the Equity 6928) in his 1990 book and documentary The Missing Reel.[19] Rawlence claims that at the time that he vanished, Le Prince was about to patent his 1889 projector in the UK and then leave Europe for his scheduled New York official exhibition. His widow assumed foul play though no concrete evidence has ever emerged and Rawlence prefers the suicide theory.

In 1898, Le Prince's elder son Adolphe, who had assisted his father in many of his experiments, was called as a witness for the American Mutoscope Company in their litigation with Edison [Equity 6928]. By citing Le Prince's achievements, Mutoscope hoped to annul Edison's subsequent claims to have invented the moving-picture camera. Le Prince's widow Lizzie and Adolphe hoped that this would gain recognition for Le Prince's achievement, but when the case went against Mutoscope their hopes were dashed. Three years later, 28-year-old Adolphe was found dead on Fire Island near New York,[20] having committed suicide by shooting himself through his forehead.[21]

Disappearance ordered by the family

[edit]

In 1966, Jacques Deslandes proposed a theory in Histoire comparée du cinéma (The Comparative History of Cinema), claiming that Le Prince voluntarily disappeared due to financial reasons and "familial conveniences". Journalist Léo Sauvage quotes a note shown to him by Pierre Gras, director of the Dijon municipal library, in 1977, that claimed Le Prince died in Chicago in 1898, having moved there at the family's request because he was homosexual; but he rejects that assertion.[22] It is extremely likely that this wasn't at all true, as there is no evidence to suggest that Le Prince was gay.[23]

Fratricide, murder for money

[edit]

In 1967, Jean Mitry proposed, in Histoire du cinéma, that Le Prince was killed. Mitry notes that if Le Prince truly wanted to disappear, he could have done so at any time prior to that. Thus, he most likely never boarded the train in Dijon. He also wonders why his brother, who was the last person to have seen Le Prince alive and knew Le Prince was suicidal, didn't try to stop Le Prince, and why he didn't report Le Prince's mental state to the police before it was too late.[24]

Suspected drowning

[edit]

A photograph of a drowned man pulled from the Seine in 1890, strongly resembling Le Prince, was discovered in 2003 during research in the Paris police archives.[12][25] This led to the theory that he had failed to get his moving picture to work, had heavy debts, and thus chose to take his own life.[17] However, it has been claimed that the body was too short to be Le Prince.[26]

Patents and cameras

[edit]

On 10 January 1888, Le Prince was granted an American patent on a 16-lens device that he claimed could serve as both motion picture camera (which he termed "the receiver or photo-camera") and a projector (which he called "the deliverer or stereopticon").[27] That same day he took out a near-identical provisional patent for the same devices in Great Britain, proposing "a system of preferably 3, 4, 8, 9, 16 or more lenses". Shortly before the final version was submitted he added a sentence which described a single-lens system, but this was neither fully explained nor illustrated, unlike the several pages of description of the multi-lens system,[28] meaning the single-lens camera was not legally covered by patent.

This addendum was submitted on 10 October 1888[29] and, on 14 October, Le Prince used his single-lens camera to film Roundhay Garden Scene. During the period 1889–1890 he worked with the mechanic James Longley on various "deliverers" (projectors) with one, two, three and sixteen lenses. The images were to be separated, printed and mounted individually, sometimes on a flexible band, moved by metal eyelets.

The single lens projector used individual pictures mounted in wooden frames.[29] His assistant, James Longley, claimed the three-lens version was the most successful.[29] Those close to Le Prince have testified to him projecting his first films in his workshop as tests, but they were never presented to anyone outside his immediate circle of family and associates and the nature of the projector is unknown.

In 1889, he took French-American dual citizenship in order to establish himself with his family in New York City and to follow up his research. However, he was never able to perform his planned public exhibition at the Morris–Jumel Mansion in Manhattan, in September 1890, due to his disappearance.[30]

Later recognition

[edit]

Even though Le Prince's achievement is remarkable, with only William Friese-Greene and Wordsworth Donisthorpe achieving anything comparable in the period 1888–1890, his work was largely forgotten until the 1920s, as he disappeared before the first public demonstration of the result of his work, having never shown his invention to any photographic society or scientific institution or the general public.

For the April 1894 commercial exploitation of his personal kinetoscope parlor, Thomas Edison is credited in the US as the inventor of cinema, while in France, the Lumière Brothers are hailed as inventors of the Cinématographe device and for the first commercial exhibition of motion-picture films, in Paris in 1895.

However, in Leeds, Le Prince is celebrated as a local hero. On 12 December 1930, the Lord Mayor of Leeds unveiled a bronze memorial tablet at 160 Woodhouse Lane, Le Prince's former workshop. In 2003, the University of Leeds's Centre for Cinema, Photography and Television was named in his honour. Le Prince's workshop in Woodhouse Lane was until recently the site of the BBC in Leeds, and is now part of the Leeds Beckett University Broadcasting Place complex, where a blue plaque commemorates his work. (coordinates: 53°48′20.58″N 1°32′56.74″W / 53.8057167°N 1.5490944°W / 53.8057167; -1.5490944). Reconstructions of his film strips are shown in the cinema of the Armley Mills Industrial Museum, Leeds.

In France, an appreciation society was created as L'Association des Amis de Le Prince (Association of Le Prince's Friends), which still exists in Lyon.

In 1990, Christopher Rawlence wrote The Missing Reel, The Untold Story of the Lost inventor of Moving Pictures and produced the TV programme The Missing Reel (1989) for Channel Four, a dramatised feature on the life of Le Prince.

In 1992, the Japanese filmmaker Mamoru Oshii directed Talking Head, an avant-garde feature film paying tribute to the tragic endings of early cinematography figures such as George Eastman, Georges Méliès and Louis Le Prince who is credited as "the true inventor of eiga", 映画, Japanese for "motion picture film".

In 2013, a feature documentary, The First Film was produced, with new research material and documentation on the life of Le Prince and his patents. Produced and directed by Leeds-born David Nicholas Wilkinson with research by Irfan Shah, it was filmed in England, France and the United States by Guerilla Films.[31] The First Film features several film historians to tell the story, including Michael Harvey, Irfan Shah, Stephen Herbert, Mark Rance, Daniel Martin, Jacques Pfend, Adrian Wootton, Tony North, Mick McCann, Tony Earnshaw, Carol S Ward, Liz Rymer, and twice Oscar-nominated cinematographer Tony Pierce-Roberts.

Le Prince's great-great-granddaughter Laurie Snyder also makes an appearance. It had its world première in June 2015 at the Edinburgh Film Festival and opened in UK cinemas on 3 July 2015. The film also played in festivals in the US, Canada, Russia, Ireland and Belgium. On 8 September 2016 it played at the Morris-Jumel Mansion in New York, where 126 years earlier Le Prince planned to show his films.

In 2023, the Roundhay Garden Scene was shown and recreated for the grand finale of the 10th Annual Live On Cinema Oscar Special.[32]

Types of Le Prince cine camera-projectors

[edit]
Design Model Specs Manufacture Patents
1886, New York 16-lens camera and projector Patent: "Method of and apparatus for producing animated pictures of natural scenery and life" (USA) and in all later foreign patents.
Designation: LePrince 16-lens camera/projector
Framerate: 16 frames per second (according to patent)
Medium: Glass plates and Eastman paper film
Made in Paris, 1887 US Patent No. 376,247/217,809
Issued
United States Washington
2 November 1886
Accepted
10 January 1888
FR Patent No. 188,089
Issued
France Paris
11 January 1888
Accepted
June 1890 (and BR patent 423 – see below)
Leeds, 1888 Single-lens camera Patent: Mentioned but not described or illustrated in "Improvements in the Method of and Apparatus for Producing Animated Photographic Pictures"
Designation: Le Prince single-lens "receiver" (camera) Mk2
Framerate: 5–7 frames per second
Lenses: Viewfinder (upper) & Photograph (lower)
Film: sensitised paper film & gelatin stripping film (60mm)
Focus: lever (backward/forward)
Made in Leeds, 1888
  • Frederic Mason (body and wooden parts)
  • James William Longley (design and working parts)
BR patent no. 423
Issued
United Kingdom London
10 January 1888
Accepted
16 November 1888 [Mentioned but not described]
Leeds, 1889 Single-lens projector
Single-lens "deliverer" (projector). Each frame was printed on glass and mounted in a mahogany frame. These were moved before the lens in a continuous spiral. The heat of the lamp and the movement of the frames often caused the glass to break. Top framerate: 7fps. Made in Leeds, 1889 Never patented
Leeds, 1889 or 1890 Three-lens projector Three-lens "deliverer" (projector), used frames mounted individually in three flexible strips of Willesden paper with brass eyelets to move them. Projection presumably alternated 1-2-3 between the three strips/lenses and each strip moved when the light was cut off. Made in Leeds 1889 or 1890 Never patented

Legacy

[edit]

Remaining material and production

[edit]
Back view of Le Prince's single-lens Cine Camera-Projector MkII opened (Science Museum, London, 1930).

Le Prince developed a single-lens camera in his workshop at 160 Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, which was used to shoot his motion-picture films. Remaining surviving production consists of two scenes in the garden at Oakwood Grange (his wife's family home, in Roundhay) and another of Leeds Bridge.

Forty years later, Le Prince's daughter, Marie, gave the remaining apparatus to the Science Museum, London (later transferred to the National Museum of Photography, Film and Television (NMPFT), Bradford, which opened in 1983 and is now the National Science and Media Museum). In May 1931, photographic plates were produced by workers of the Science Museum from paper print copies provided by Marie Le Prince.[2]

In 1999, these were re-animated to produce digital versions. Roundhay Garden was alleged by the Le Prince family to have been shot at 12 frame/s and Leeds Bridge at 20 frame/s, although this is not borne out by the NMPFT versions (see below) or motion analysis, with both films being estimated at a consistent seven frames a second.[33]

All available versions of these sequences are derived from materials held by the National Science and Media Museum.

Man Walking Around a Corner (16-Lens Camera)

[edit]
The entire film animated

The only existing images from Le Prince's 16-lens camera are a sequence of 16 frames of a man walking around a corner. This appears to have been shot onto a single glass plate (which has since broken), rather than the twin strips of Eastman paper film envisaged in his patent. Jacques Pfend, a French cinema-historian and Le Prince specialist, confirms that these images were shot in Paris, at the corner of Rue Bochart-de-Saron (where Le Prince was living) and Avenue Trudaine. Le Prince sent 8 images of his mechanic running (which may be from this sequence) to his wife in New York City in a letter dated 18 August 1887,[34] which suggests it represented a significant camera test. Exposure is very irregular from lens to lens with some of the images almost completely bleached out, which Le Prince later on fixed.

Roundhay Garden Scene (Single-Lens Camera MkII)

[edit]

The 1931 National Science Museum copy of what remains of a sequence shot in Roundhay Garden features 20 frames. The frames appear to have been printed in reverse from the negative, but this is corrected in the video. The film's damaged edge results in distortion and deformation on the right side of the stabilised digital movie. The scene was shot in Le Prince's father-in-law's garden at Oakwood Grange, Roundhay on 14 October 1888. The NMPFT animation lasts two seconds at 24fps (frames per second), meaning the original footage is playing at 10fps. In this version, the action is speeded up – the original footage was probably shot at 7fps.

Traffic Crossing Leeds Bridge (Single-Lens Camera MkII)

[edit]
Video clip, 2 seconds

Louis Le Prince filmed traffic crossing Leeds Bridge from Hicks the Ironmongers[1] at the following coordinates: 53°47′37.70″N 1°32′29.18″W / 53.7938056°N 1.5414389°W / 53.7938056; -1.5414389.[35]

The earliest copy belongs to the 1923 NMPFT inventory (frames 118–120 and 122–124), though this longer sequence comes from the 1931 inventory (frames 110–129). According to Adolphe Le Prince who assisted his father when this film was shot in late October 1888, it was taken at 20fps. However, the digitally stabilised sequence produced by the NMPFT lasts two seconds, meaning the footage is playing here at 10fps. As with the Roundhay Garden sequence, its appearance is sped up, suggesting the original footage was probably shot at 7fps. This would fit with what we know of the projection experiments, where James Longley reported a top speed of 7fps.[36]

Accordion Player (Single-Lens Camera MkII)

[edit]
Amateur remastering

The last remaining film of Le Prince's single-lens camera is a sequence of frames of Adolphe Le Prince playing a diatonic button accordion. It was recorded on the steps of the house of Joseph Whitley, Louis's father-in-law.[2] The recording date may be the same as Roundhay Garden as the camera is in a similar position and Adolphe is dressed the same. The NMPFT has not remastered this film.

Personal life

[edit]

Le Prince was a Freemason,[37] initiated into the Lodge of Fidelity No. 289 in Leeds in 1876,[38] he later demitted in 1880.

Filmography

[edit]
Film
Year Title Director Editor Producer Cinematographer
1887 Man Walking Around a Corner Yes No Yes Yes
1888 Roundhay Garden Scene Yes Yes Yes Yes
Traffic Crossing Leeds Bridge Yes No No Yes
Accordion Player Yes No No Yes
Archive footage
Year Title Role Notes
2015 The First Film Posthumous release

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Louis Aimé Augustin Le Prince (28 August 1841 – disappeared 16 September 1890) was a French inventor, artist, and chemist renowned for developing one of the earliest motion picture cameras and producing the first known films, including the in 1888, widely regarded as the oldest surviving motion picture. Born in , , to an artillery captain who was a friend of pioneering photographer , Le Prince obtained his from the Lycée Saint-Louis in and studied physics and chemistry at universities in , , and . In 1866, he relocated to , , where he joined the enameling firm Whitley Partners and married the owner's daughter, Elizabeth Whitley, in 1869; together, they established the School of Applied Arts in 1874 and innovated a photo-enameling process used to create portraits of figures like and William Gladstone. Inspired by a slipping photograph and a magic lantern demonstration, Le Prince began experimenting with moving images in the mid-1880s, designing a 16-lens "receiver" (camera) and "deliverer" (projector) system to capture and project sequential photographs at up to 16 frames per second. He filed for a U.S. patent on 2 November 1886, which was granted as U.S. Patent No. 376,247 on 10 January 1888, describing a method and apparatus for producing animated pictures of natural scenery and life using sensitized paper strips advanced by a clockwork mechanism. A corresponding UK patent was granted on 16 November 1888, with an additional provision for a single-lens version. In 1888, using a refined single-lens camera loaded with George Eastman's flexible roll film and operating at 12 frames per second, Le Prince filmed the Roundhay Garden Scene on 14 October—a 2.11-second clip featuring his family and friends in the garden of a house in Roundhay, Leeds—and a traffic scene at Leeds Bridge, predating similar efforts by Thomas Edison and the Lumière brothers by several years. Le Prince's work was overshadowed by his sudden disappearance on 16 September 1890, while traveling by train from , , to to meet his family and prepare a public demonstration of his invention in New York; he boarded the train but never arrived, with his luggage later found unclaimed at the station. Despite extensive searches by French police and , no trace was found, leading to theories of due to financial pressures, by a disgruntled brother-in-law over disputes, random in , or by rivals like Edison, though his family’s subsequent lawsuit against Edison for was unsuccessful. He was legally declared dead on 16 September 1897, freezing his patents for seven years and allowing others to advance motion picture technology without his involvement. Rediscovered in the through his son Adolphe's efforts, Le Prince is now posthumously honored as the "Father of Cinematography," with his single-lens camera preserved at the in , , and recognizing his contributions via a 1930 memorial tablet and the naming of the ' Centre for Cinema, Photography and Television in his honor in 2003. His pioneering films, restored and digitized, underscore his foundational role in the birth of cinema, demonstrating practical single-lens capture and projection years before commercial viability.

Early Life and Education

Birth and Family

Louis Aimé Augustin Le Prince was born on 28 August 1841 in , , into a family with a strong military background and connections to the emerging field of . His father was a major of artillery in the , often away on duty, which shaped the family's environment during Le Prince's early years. The family's ties to the arts stemmed from the father's close friendship with , the pioneer of the photographic process; this connection provided Le Prince with early exposure to through regular visits to Daguerre's studio, where he observed and learned about chemical and optical techniques as a child. Little is documented about his siblings, though the household's artistic influences likely fostered Le Prince's initial interests in chemistry and . The (1870–1871) profoundly affected the family's stability and Le Prince's formative experiences; having already moved to in 1866, he returned to to serve as an officer of volunteers during the siege of , enduring the conflict's hardships before rejoining his family in afterward. Upon his return, the Le Princes established a school of applied art in , marking a relocation and new chapter influenced by the war's disruptions in .

Studies and Influences

Louis Le Prince received his early , where his family's connections provided him with foundational exposure to artistic and scientific pursuits. His father was a major of artillery whose friends included pioneering photographer , allowing Le Prince to benefit from this proximity to innovation from a young age. Le Prince studied physics and chemistry at institutions in , , and , earning a from the Lycée Saint-Louis. As a youth, Le Prince was directly influenced by Daguerre, who imparted lessons in and chemistry, introducing him to the process and related chemical techniques that were central to early image capture. This mentorship sparked Le Prince's lifelong interest in visual recording technologies, laying the groundwork for his later experiments in motion imaging. He subsequently pursued formal studies in art, focusing on at institutions in , where he honed skills in composition and color that would inform his photographic work. Complementing his artistic training, Le Prince undertook postgraduate studies in chemistry at the University of in the , where he explored chemical processes relevant to , such as emulsions and sensitizing agents. These investigations into light-sensitive materials and chemical reactions foreshadowed his innovations in flexible for moving pictures, bridging his artistic background with technical experimentation. His Leipzig education emphasized practical applications of chemistry, enhancing his ability to manipulate photographic media beyond static images.

Professional Career

Work in Leeds

In 1866, Louis Le Prince relocated to , , at the invitation of John R. Whitley, a young engineer, to join the Whitley family firm, Whitley Partners, an engineering company focused on founding and manufacturing. There, Le Prince served as manager of the valve department, applying his skills in a industrial setting that involved technical design and production processes. His prior in chemistry and physics proved valuable in supporting these manufacturing roles, where knowledge of materials and chemical properties was essential. Le Prince's involvement with Whitley Partners extended to representing the company and other industries at international exhibitions, such as the 1867 Exposition Universelle in , promoting local engineering innovations. Through these ties, he collaborated closely with the Whitley family on various ventures, leveraging his artistic and technical expertise to expand their commercial activities. These partnerships laid the groundwork for later explorations into emerging technologies, including early photographic experiments that aligned with the firm's innovative spirit. By 1874, after passing required exams to teach in , Le Prince established a studio at 33 Park Square in , where he offered portrait services and instruction in , such as and artistic techniques. This venture marked a shift toward creative and educational pursuits, blending his industrial experience with his passion for art and in a dedicated professional space.

Artistic and Photographic Pursuits

In 1874, Louis Le Prince, alongside his wife Elizabeth, established the School of Applied Arts at 33 Park Square in , operating it as a portrait studio that offered practical training in and related crafts. The studio produced a range of photographic works, including cartes-de-visite—small, affordable cards popular in the —and larger format images, often enhanced through innovative tinting and firing techniques to add color and depth. Notable examples included portraits of prominent figures such as and William Gladstone, which were later preserved in a at London's Cleopatra's Needle. Le Prince's artistic pursuits extended beyond standard portraiture into experimental techniques, blending photography with other media. He developed methods for reproducing photographic images onto enamels, ceramics, and metals, employing lithography-inspired processes to transfer and fix visuals onto diverse surfaces. Complementing this, he conducted experiments in painting and glazing, particularly firing paints on ceramics to achieve durable, artistic finishes that merged photographic realism with painterly effects. These endeavors reflected his broader creative interests, honed through collaborations with his artist wife and local craftsmen, and positioned the studio as a hub for in industrial . From 1881 to 1887, Le Prince lived and worked in the United States, serving as an agent for Whitley Partners and managing a group of French artists while continuing his photographic experiments. Upon his return to , his pursuits evolved toward motion studies; by the mid-1880s, he experimented with paper film strips sensitized for multiple exposures, laying the groundwork for his later inventions in capturing movement.

Inventions and Patents

Camera Designs

Le Prince's early work on motion picture technology began with a multi-lens camera developed between 1886 and 1888, designed to capture higher frame rates through simultaneous exposures. This device featured 16 fixed lenses arranged in a row, each equipped with an independent shutter that fired in rapid sequence to produce up to 16 images per cycle, addressing the limitations of slow film advancement at the time. It utilized paper-based , likely exposed onto a single glass plate or moving paper strips as described in contemporary designs, allowing for short bursts of motion recording without the need for continuous . The bulky wooden and brass construction, measuring approximately 544 mm by 550 mm by 430 mm, made it suitable primarily for controlled indoor testing rather than field use. Transitioning to more practical designs, Le Prince refined his approach with single-lens cameras, iterating through versions including an early model (Mk I) and a later improved one (Mk II) by 1888. These used 60 mm (2 3/8-inch) wide unperforated paper strips coated with light-sensitive emulsions, advanced manually via a hand-crank mechanism that wound the film between two spools. A flat pressure plate steadied the film behind the taking lens during exposure, while a rotating circular slotted shutter regulated the intermittent motion, enabling frame rates of around 5–7 per second in the Mk II version. The emphasized simplicity and reliability, with the lower lens dedicated to and the upper to viewing, all housed in a wooden body with fittings for durability. To enhance performance, Le Prince experimented with film sensitivity by applying gelatin-based emulsions directly onto the paper backing, which improved light capture and reduced exposure times compared to earlier dry plates. This innovation, drawing on contemporary photographic advances like those from , allowed for clearer images and better suitability for projection systems he concurrently developed, where similar spool and shutter mechanisms reproduced motion by advancing the negative at controlled speeds. These emulsion tests marked a key evolution, enabling the cameras to handle varying light conditions more effectively. In terms of functionality, the single-lens cameras offered greater portability than the 16-lens prototype, with a detachable handle and compact form (576 mm by 275 mm by 430 mm) that facilitated outdoor shooting, while the multi-lens version's complexity limited it to studio prototypes. The hand-crank operation in both provided variable control over speed, though the single-lens design's simpler transport via friction spools proved more reliable for extended sequences, prioritizing ease of use over the multi-lens's rapid but cumbersome exposure method.

Patent Applications and Disputes

Le Prince filed a in the United States on November 2, 1886, for his multi-lens motion picture camera, which was granted as U.S. No. 376,247 on January 10, 1888, under the "Method of and Apparatus for Producing Animated Pictures of Natural Scenery and Life." This described a 16-lens "receiver" (camera) and corresponding "deliverer" () system designed to capture and reproduce sequences of up to 16 images per cycle on sensitized paper film, advancing at speeds sufficient for animated effects. On the same day the U.S. issued, Le Prince applied for a British , numbered 423, which was granted on November 16, 1888; this included provisions for both multi-lens and single-lens configurations, addressing limitations in the earlier design. Le Prince also filed a French (No. 188,089) on January 11, 1888, which was granted in June 1890, covering aspects of his motion picture apparatus. In preparation for public demonstrations in the United States in , Le Prince refined his single-lens in and planned exhibitions in New York to capitalize on his , including securing premises for showings. However, he faced significant challenges in achieving comprehensive protection, particularly in the U.S., where examiners inclusion of the single-lens mechanism in the original filing, deeming it anticipated by such as earlier proposals for sequential . This left gaps in coverage for his improved single-lens camera, which he had constructed by but could not fully safeguard against competitors without additional filings, complicating his commercialization efforts ahead of the planned U.S. trip. Following Le Prince's disappearance in September 1890, his family, led by his wife Elizabeth and Adolphe, pursued legal action to assert his inventions' priority and challenge alleged infringements. In 1898, they supported the American Mutoscope Company in the landmark U.S. court case known as Equity 6928 (Thomas A. Edison v. American Mutoscope Co.), where Adolphe testified to demonstrate that Le Prince's 1888 patents and prototypes predated Edison's work, aiming to invalidate Edison's kinetograph and patents on grounds of prior invention and potential theft of ideas. The litigation, which spanned several years and involved detailed examination of Le Prince's devices and films, ultimately ruled in Edison's favor in 1903, though it highlighted the family's claims of misappropriation. Claims of Le Prince's priority over Edison's remain unresolved in historical assessments, supported by evidence from his earlier prototypes, including the surviving 1888 film shot on the single-lens camera, which demonstrates five years before Edison's public Kinetoscope demonstration in 1893. Le Prince's U.S. filing in 1886 and British grant in 1888 establish a timeline predating Edison's systematic development of the Kinetoscope, which received its key patents starting with applications in 1891, including No. 589,168 for the Kinetograph camera granted in 1897 and No. 493,426 for the Kinetoscope granted in 1893, yet legal outcomes favored Edison due to the lack of Le Prince's physical presence and complete documentation.

Personal Life

Marriage and Children

Louis Le Prince married Elizabeth Whitley, known as Lizzie, in 1869 in , . , born in 1846, came from a family prominent in the local engineering and manufacturing sector through her father's brass foundry business, Whitley & Co., though she herself trained as an under Carrier-Belleuse at and shared Le Prince's passion for the arts. The couple had five children, including Adolphe (1872–1901) and Marie. Ferchault and Marie pursued artistic interests influenced by their parents, while Adolphe developed technical skills that aligned with his father's inventions; the younger children grew up amid the family's transatlantic relocations. Adolphe, in particular, assisted Le Prince in early film experiments, appearing in test footage such as the 1888 Roundhay Garden Scene, where he played the accordion, and later helped demonstrate the motion-picture technology. The Le Princes established their domestic life in , initially residing at Roundhay Cottage from around 1865 to 1877 before moving to 33 Park Square, where they founded the Leeds Technical School of Applied Art, blending family and professional pursuits. Financial strains emerged in the mid-1870s due to the mounting debts of the Whitley Partners firm, prompting Le Prince to seek opportunities abroad; in 1881, the family relocated to New York to promote the Lincrusta-Walton wallcovering process, but Le Prince returned to in 1887 to focus on cinematographic development amid ongoing economic pressures, while his family remained in New York.

Other Interests

Louis Le Prince was a member of the Philosophical and Literary Society, an organization founded in 1819 that served as a hub for scientific, literary, and historical pursuits in the city during his residence there. This affiliation connected him to local intellectuals and provided a forum for discussing advancements in science and the arts, aligning with his experimental interests beyond professional . Le Prince shared a passion for the arts with his wife, including attendance at magic shows and visual spectacles, which complemented his photographic endeavors. His travels extended to the in 1881, initially as an agent for the Lincrusta Walton company, where he remained with his family after the contract ended, pursuing further opportunities in and . Archival records reveal correspondence networks related to Le Prince's work, including letters from his chief mechanic James William Longley and son regarding technical innovations in moving pictures after his disappearance. These communications, preserved in the Louis Le Prince Collection at the , reflect exchanges that influenced his development of early technology, drawing on ideas from European contemporaries in and .

Disappearance

Circumstances

Louis Le Prince was last seen on 16 September 1890 at the train station in , where he parted ways with his brother Albert before boarding a train to . This leg of the journey was part of his planned travel to New York, where he intended to reunite with his family and conduct demonstrations of his motion picture patents to secure their recognition. Le Prince failed to arrive in Paris, and his luggage, which included important equipment and documents, was found unclaimed at the Paris station. In the days following, his wife, Sarah Elizabeth Whitley, initiated searches across and notified authorities , but no evidence of his whereabouts emerged. On 16 September 1897, exactly seven years after his vanishing, Le Prince was officially declared dead under French law, which presumed death after prolonged unexplained absence without trace.

Theories and Investigations

One prominent theory posits that Le Prince was murdered by associates of to eliminate competition in the burgeoning field of motion picture technology. Le Prince's widow, Elizabeth Whitley, and son long suspected Edison of orchestrating the disappearance, particularly in light of the impending patent battles over moving-image devices. This hypothesis gained traction through the 1898 lawsuit known as Equity 6928, filed by the American Mutoscope Company against Edison, in which presented evidence of Le Prince's prior inventions to challenge Edison's claims to the . Proponents argue that Edison's history of aggressive tactics, including hiring armed guards during labor disputes, could extend to suppressing rivals like Le Prince, who was en route to demonstrate his camera in New York. However, no direct evidence links Edison to the disappearance, and the ultimately failed to annul Edison's patents, though it was later overturned on appeal. Another hypothesis suggests Le Prince's disappearance was ordered or facilitated by his family to escape mounting financial debts. In 1966, film historian Jacques Deslandes proposed in his book Histoire comparée du cinéma that Le Prince voluntarily vanished due to insolvency, staging his exit to avoid creditors amid his struggling enterprises in and New York. This theory speculated that family members, aware of his precarious situation, may have assisted in the ruse. It has been refuted by Le Prince's descendants, who maintain that the family actively pursued investigations and legal actions for years, inconsistent with complicity in a . Suspicions of have also arisen, centering on Le Prince's brother Albert as the perpetrator motivated by financial gain. Albert was the last person to reportedly see Le Prince alive in , and a dispute over their late mother's 60,000-franc inheritance—equivalent to approximately $700,000 today—created tension, especially as Le Prince's debts exceeded £600 by 1890 and Albert refused further assistance. Theorists point to Albert's potential of Le Prince's share as a motive, but the brothers' historically close relationship and lack of concrete evidence undermine this claim. A more straightforward explanation involves suspected or , potentially linked to Le Prince's deteriorating under financial and professional pressures. In October 1890, a body matching Le Prince's general description was recovered from the and displayed at the Morgue, showing signs of trauma consistent with a beating prior to . A of this unidentified victim, discovered in 2003 during at the police department, bears a strong resemblance to Le Prince, including facial features and build, though the official report omitted his distinctive height of 6 feet 3 inches, casting doubt on the identification. Speculation of stems from reports of Le Prince's despondency, but family accounts emphasize his optimism about upcoming demonstrations, making this theory contested. Modern investigations continue to probe these unresolved leads, with Paul Fischer's 2022 book The Man Who Invented Motion Pictures: A True Tale of Obsession, , and the Movies offering a comprehensive reexamination based on primary sources such as family memoirs and court records. Fischer explores the patent rivalry's intensity and financial motives without endorsing a single theory, highlighting inconsistencies in witness accounts and the 1890 case as key enigmas. Earlier efforts, including Christopher Rawlence's 1990 biography The Missing Reel and David Nicholas Wilkinson's 2015 documentary , similarly sift through archival evidence but conclude the fate remains indeterminate.

Legacy

Posthumous Recognition

Following Louis Le Prince's disappearance in 1890, his family, led by his wife Elizabeth and son , initiated legal proceedings against in the landmark patent dispute known as Equity No. 6928, aiming to secure recognition for Le Prince's motion picture inventions. The case, filed in the 1890s and extending into the early 1900s, pitted the Le Prince heirs against Edison's company over rights to single-lens camera technology, highlighting the fierce competition in early patents. Although the family did not prevail, the litigation underscored Le Prince's pioneering role and drew initial public attention to his overlooked contributions. In , where Le Prince conducted much of his work, early 20th-century tributes began to emerge, reflecting growing local appreciation for his innovations. On December 12, 1930, the of unveiled a bronze memorial tablet at Le Prince's former workshop on Woodhouse Lane, now part of , honoring him as the inventor of the one-lens cinema camera. This commemoration, one of the first formal acknowledgments of his legacy, was accompanied by exhibits of his equipment and papers at local institutions. Subsequent UK heritage efforts further enshrined Le Prince's memory. erected a on Leeds Bridge in 2010, marking the site where he filmed one of the world's earliest motion pictures in 1888. Another , installed at the Broadcasting Place complex of , commemorates his arrival in Leeds in 1866 and his experiments there. Modern revivals have renewed scholarly and cultural interest in Le Prince. The 2015 documentary , directed by Nicholas Wilkinson, traces his life, inventions, and mysterious fate, arguing for his status as cinema's true originator based on archival evidence from . In 2022, Paul Fischer's The Man Who Invented Motion Pictures: A True Tale of Obsession, Murder, and the Movies examined Le Prince's battles with Edison and the enigma of his vanishing, drawing on family records and court documents to reframe film history. The ongoing mystery surrounding Le Prince's disappearance has sustained this fascination, inspiring investigations into potential foul play amid patent rivalries. In 2025, the theatrical production The Curious Circumstances of Louis Le Prince by Chase Wheaton-Werle premiered at The Factory Theater in Chicago, dramatizing his family's quest for justice and his cinematic breakthroughs.

Surviving Films and Preservation

The surviving films attributed to Louis Le Prince represent the earliest known examples of motion picture sequences, all produced in 1888 using his innovative camera designs. These short clips, captured on paper-based film stock, demonstrate foundational experiments in recording and reproducing movement, predating similar efforts by and the brothers. Only a limited number of frames from each survive, preserved as fragile paper prints that reveal the technical challenges of early , such as inconsistent exposure and rudimentary . The "," filmed on October 14, 1888, in the garden of Le Prince's in-laws' home in , , is a 2-second sequence showing four family members—Le Prince's wife Elizabeth, her father Joseph Whitley, her mother , and Adolphe Le Prince—walking in a circle. Shot with the single-lens Mk II camera at approximately 10 frames per second, it consists of 20 preserved frames that capture subtle natural movements, including the elderly Joseph Whitley's faltering . This clip, often regarded as the oldest surviving motion picture, was produced as a domestic test to verify the camera's ability to record continuous action. "Traffic Crossing Leeds Bridge," also from October 1888, depicts everyday urban life with horse-drawn carriages, pedestrians, and cyclists crossing the River Aire in , filmed from an elevated window overlooking the bridge. This outdoor footage, intended to be played at approximately 20 frames per second (lasting about 1 second), but often presented at 7-10 frames per second for a duration of about 2 seconds in modern reproductions, highlights Le Prince's ambition to document real-world motion beyond controlled settings. Restored versions, created through frame-by-frame enhancement to address degradation and flickering, have enabled detailed analysis of the 20 surviving frames, revealing period details like and types that provide historical into late-Victorian . "Man Walking Around a Corner," dated to 1887 or early 1888, serves as a test for Le Prince's 16-lens camera prototype, capturing a sequence of a man (likely his mechanic) rounding a street corner in 16 sequential frames taken at 16 images per second. This non-perforated paper strip exhibits motion artifacts, such as jerky progression and overlapping exposures, due to the multi-lens mechanism's limitations in synchronizing captures. Intended to simulate fluid movement when projected, it underscores Le Prince's iterative approach to solving challenges. The "Accordion Player," filmed on October 14, 1888—the same day as ""—features Le Prince's son performing on a on the steps of the family home in . This approximately 2-second clip (18 frames at around 12 frames per second), shot with the single-lens Mk II camera, preserves about 18 frames of Adolphe's hand movements and the instrument's bellows, offering a personal glimpse into Le Prince's experimentation with indoor subjects. Unlike the other films, it remains largely unremastered, retaining its original paper print characteristics without modern enhancements. Preservation efforts for Le Prince's films began in earnest in the 1930s, when his daughter Marie Le Prince and engineer E. Kilburn Scott, a former collaborator, brought surviving paper prints and equipment from the to the , drawing international attention to his work. These materials were donated to institutions in and later centralized for safekeeping. By the , digitization initiatives at museums converted the fragile originals into high-resolution scans, facilitating non-destructive study and public access while mitigating risks from handling the deteriorating paper stock. Today, all known frames and related artifacts are held by the in , part of the , where they are stored in controlled environments and occasionally displayed in exhibitions on early cinema history. Ongoing conservation includes periodic to monitor degradation and support reproductions for educational purposes.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.