Hubbry Logo
Mossi KingdomsMossi KingdomsMain
Open search
Mossi Kingdoms
Community hub
Mossi Kingdoms
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Mossi Kingdoms
Mossi Kingdoms
Mossi Kingdoms
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

PersonMoaaga
PeopleMosse
LanguageMòoré
CountryMoogho
Part of a series on the
History of Burkina Faso
Flag of Burkina Faso
Bura
Bura-Asinda		 Prehistoric
c. 3rd–13th century
Mossi Kingdoms c. 11th century – 1896
Kong Empire c. 1710 – 1898
French Upper Volta
1919–1932
1947–1958
Republic 1958–1984
Burkina Faso
(1984–present)
Agacher Strip War 1985
1987 Burkina Faso coup d'état 1987
Compaoré rule 1987–2014
Burkinabè revolution 2014
Transitional period 2014–2015
Jihadist insurgency 2015–present
Burkinabé coup d'état 2015
2015 elections and aftermath 2015–2022
January and September coup d'état 2022

The Mossi Kingdoms, were a group of kingdoms in modern-day Burkina Faso that dominated the region of the upper Volta river for hundreds of years. The largest Mossi kingdom was that of Ouagadougou. The king of Ouagadougou, known as the Mogho Naaba, or King of All the World, served as the Emperor of all the Mossi.

The first kingdom was founded when warriors from the ancient Great Naa Gbewaa kingdom in present-day Ghana region and Mandé warriors moved into the area and intermarried with local people. The different kingdom's consolidation of political and military power began in the 13th century, leading to conflicts between the Mossi kingdoms and other nearby powerful states. In 1896, the French took over the kingdoms and created the French Upper Volta colony, which for many decades largely governed using the Mossi administrative structure.

Some Mossi Kingdoms still exist today as constituent monarchies within Burkina Faso. Most notably, Naba Baongo II currently reigns as Mogho Naba of Wogodogo (Ouagadougou).[1] The kingdoms of Boussouma, Fada N'gourma, Tenkodogo, and Yatenga currently co-exist in a similar fashion, each with their own monarchs. While they no longer hold sovereignty, they still retain some cultural and political influence.[2][3][4][5]

History

[edit]

Origin

[edit]

Accounts of the origin of the Mossi kingdoms and parts of their history are imprecise, with contradictory oral traditions disagreeing on certain aspects of the story.[6] The origin story is unique in that a woman plays a key role as the progenitor of the royal line.[7]

The origins of the Mossi state are claimed by one prominent oral tradition to come from when a Moré-Dagbamba princess, Yennenga, left home because of a dispute with her father, Naa Gbewaa, the founder of the Kingdom of the now Tri-kingdoms of Mamprugu, Dagban, and Namumba.

The Dagbamba ethnic group comprises Mamprusi, dagomba, Nanumba, and Mossi People. These four sub-groups sprung out of the three sons and daughter of the Great King, Naa Gbewaa. Naa Gbewaa found his kingdom from Pusiga, near Bawku, stretching across almost all of Northern Ghana, Burkina Faso, and parts of northern Togo. The Mossi branch is of Yennenga, the Sister of the three brothers. The eldest of the sons is the Nayiri, King of Mamprugu He resides in Nalerigu. His younger brother is the Yaa Naa, King of Dagon He resides in Yendi. The third and youngest brother is the King of Nanumba, who resides in Bimbilla. Yennenga’s grandsons are the Kings of Tenkodogo, Fada N'gourma, Zondoma Province, Boussouma and stretching across large expanse of Burkina Faso.

This event of the story of Yennenga dates in different oral histories to be anytime between the 11th and the 15th centuries.[6] According to the story, the princess Yennenga escaped dressed as a man. She then came to the house of a Mandé elephant hunter named Rialé. They had a son named Ouédraogo who was given that name from the horse that Yennenga used to escape. Ouédraogo visited his grandfather, The Nayiri, King of Mamprugu, at Gambaga at the age of fifteen and was given four horses and 50 cows. A number of horseman joined his forces, and with them, Ouédraogo conquered the local people, married a woman named Pouiriketa who gave him three sons, and built the city of Tenkodogo. The oldest son was Diaba Lompo, who founded the city of Fada N'gourma. The second son, Rawa, became the ruler of Zondoma Province. His third son, Zoungrana, became the ruler of Tenkodogo after Ouédraogo died. Zoungrana married Pouitenga, a woman sent from the king of the Ninisi people, and the resulting intermarriages between the Dagbamba—mamprusi, dagomba, And namumba, the Mandé, the Ninisi, and local peoples became the Mossi people. Zoungrana and Pouitenga had a son, Oubri, who further expanded the kingdom by conquering the Kibissi and some Gurunsi peoples. Oubri, who ruled from around 1050 to 1090 CE, is often considered the founder of the Ouagadougou dynasty, which ruled from the capital of Ouagadougou.[6][8]

Rise and centralization

[edit]
The cavalry of the Mossi states were experts at raiding deep into enemy territory, even against the formidable Mali Empire. Image: Boukary Koutou, also known as Wobgho, Mossi King of Ouagadougou, with his cavalry escort, Burkina Faso, 1892.

Following the reign of Oubri, centralization and small-scale expansion of the kingdoms were the primary tasks of rulers. The Ouagadougou dynasty retained control in Ouagadougou, but the other kingdoms established by the sons of Ouedraogo retained independence in Tenkodogo, Fada N'gourma, and Zondoma. Under the fifth ruler, Komdimie (circa 1170), two revolutions were started by members of the Ouagadougou dynasty that established the Kingdom of Yatenga to the north and the Kingdom of Rizim. War between Komdimie and Yatenga lasted for many years, with Yatenga eventually taking over the independent Mossi state of Zondoma. At the same time, Komdimie created a new level of authority for his sons as Dimas of separate provinces. They had some autonomy but recognized the sovereignty of the Ouagadougou dynasty. This system of taking over territory and appointing sons as Dimas would continue to be practiced by many of the future rulers.[8]

The increasing power of the Mossi kingdoms resulted in larger conflicts with regional powers, in particular with the Mali and Songhai Empires. In the 15th century, the Mossi took over Timbuktu and sacked the important trading post of Walata, although many historians believe that the 'Mossi' responsible for these attacks were a different group than those who claim descent from Yennenga.[9] When Askia Mohammad I became the leader of the Songhai Empire and desired to spread Islam, he waged a holy war against the Mossi kingdoms in 1497. Although the Mossi forces were defeated in this effort, they resisted the attempts to impose Islam. With the conquest of the Songhai by the Moroccans of the Saadi dynasty in 1591, the Mossi states reestablished their independence.[8]

By the 18th century, the economic and military power of the Mossi kingdoms had increased significantly. Foreign trade relations expanded throughout Africa, with important connections made with the Fula kingdoms and the Mali Empire. During this time, the Mossi were attacked by a variety of African forces. Although there were a number of jihad states in the region trying to forcibly spread Islam, namely the Massina Empire and the Sokoto Caliphate, the Mossi kingdoms largely retained their traditional religious and ritual practices.[10]

French conquest

[edit]

The first European explorer to enter the region was German Gottlob Krause in 1888. This was followed by a British expedition in 1894 led by George Ekem Ferguson, who convinced the Mossi leaders to sign a treaty of protection. Despite this, the French entered the area in 1896 and ignored the treaty of protection, conquering the Mossi Kingdom and make it part of the Upper Volta colony.[8] The French had already conquered or taken over all of the surrounding kingdoms, which had isolated the Mossi kingdoms.[6] The last king of Ouagadougou, named Wobgo or Wobogoo, was warned a day before the French forces were going to attack. He sent a force to meet them in battle as he fled the city. Wobgo's brother, Kouka, then became the king of Ouagadougou and allied himself with the French and Yatenga to try and capture Wobgo. When the French and British agreed on the boundary between their colonies, Wobgo lost his main support system and he retired with a British pension to Zongoiri in the Gold Coast, where he died in 1904.[6][11]

As a result of the significant centralization of the kingdoms, the French largely kept the administrative organization in place. They made the Mogho Naava in Ouagadougou the primary leader of the region and created five ministers under him that governed different regions (largely adhering to the Mossi kingdom borders).[8]

Organization

[edit]

The Mossi kingdoms were organized around five different kingdoms: Ouagadougou, Tenkodogo, Fada N'gourma, Zondoma (later replaced by Yatenga), and Boussouma. However, there were as many as 19 additional lesser Mossi kingdoms, which retained connection to one of the four main kingdoms.[6] Each of these retained significant domestic autonomy and independence but shared kinship, military, and ritualistic bonds with one another. Each kingdom had similar domestic structures with kings, ministers, and other officials, and a high degree of administrative centralization. There were prominent rivalries between the different kingdoms, namely between Yatenga and Ouagadougou.[6] Ouagadougou was often considered the primary Mossi kingdom, ruled by Mogho Naaba, but it was not the capital of the Mossi kingdoms as each retained autonomy.[6][12]

Domestically, the Mossi kingdoms distinguished between the nakombse and the tengbiise. The nakombse claimed lineage connections to the founders of the Mossi kingdoms and the power of naam, which gave them the divine right to rule. The tengbiise, in contrast, were people who had been assimilated into the kingdoms and would never have access to naam. However, because of their connections to the area, they did have tenga, which allowed them to make decisions about land issues. The rulers' naam and the support of tenga were connected, creating a two-way balance of power in society.[6]

Religion

[edit]

Being located near many of the main Islamic states of West Africa, the Mossi kingdoms developed a mixed religious system, recognizing some authority for Islam while retaining their indigenous Mossi Religion. The king participated in two great festivals, one focused on the genealogy of the royal lineage (in order to increase their naam) and another of sacrifices to tenga.[7]

Although they had initially resisted the imposition of Islam and had retained independence from the main Islamic states of West Africa, there began to be a sizable number of Muslims living in the kingdom. In Ouagadougou, the Mogho Naaba assigned an Imam who was allowed to deliver readings of the Qur'an to royalty in exchange for recognizing the genealogical power of the king.[7]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Mossi Kingdoms

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Mossi Kingdoms comprised a group of independent, centralized states in the upper basin of , encompassing much of present-day , that persisted for at least five centuries until their subjugation by French colonial forces in 1896–1897. Founded through conquests by migrant warrior elites who imposed hierarchical rule over local Gur-speaking populations, the kingdoms developed a featuring divine kingship under nabas (rulers) who wielded authority through a network of appointed chiefs and a naam-based system of supernatural legitimacy. The core kingdoms—Tenkodogo (the eldest and smallest), (the most militarily and politically dominant, led by the Mogho Naba), and Yatenga—along with the eastern Fada N’Gourma, formed a loose that prioritized defense and internal control over expansive empire-building. Their defining characteristic was military resilience, sustained by forces that repelled incursions from the Songhay Empire and other Sahelian powers, enabling the Mossi to remain one of the few non-Islamic states in the region to withstand proselytizing and conquest. This autonomy facilitated control over trade routes and agricultural surplus in the plateau, fostering stability amid environmental and geopolitical pressures. The kingdoms' endurance until European intervention underscores their adaptive governance, though scholarly debates persist regarding precise origins, often linked to migrations from northeastern groups like the Dagomba.

Geographical and Environmental Context

Location and Territorial Extent

The Mossi Kingdoms occupied the upper basin, with core territories centered on the Mossi Plateau in modern central and northern . This elevated region, encompassing areas around , provided a strategic base for political and military control. The kingdoms' domains primarily aligned with the landscapes of present-day , where the formed the dominant ethnic group. Principal urban and political hubs included as the paramount capital in the central plateau, Yatenga (centered near Ouahigouya) in the northwest, Tenkodogo in the southeast, and Fada N'gourma in the northeast. These centers anchored the administrative structure across the plateau and surrounding plains. At peak influence, particularly from the 15th to 16th centuries, Mossi control extended beyond the plateau into northern and adjacent fringes of Côte d'Ivoire and , though boundaries shifted through conquests and tributary relations. Such expansions were limited by the kingdoms' cavalry-based warfare and interactions with neighboring powers like the .

Climate, Resources, and Settlement Patterns

The Mossi Kingdoms occupied the central plateau of modern , a region dominated by tropical savanna vegetation with scattered trees, brush, and fields at elevations of 200–300 meters above . This area experiences a hot, dry with a short rainy season from to September, delivering 600–1,000 mm of annual , followed by a prolonged dry period influenced by winds from the . Such seasonal variability constrained to rain-fed systems, limiting crop diversity but enabling reliable yields of drought-tolerant staples during the wet months. Agricultural practices centered on millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), which thrived in the sandy-loam soils and brief rains, providing the caloric foundation for population growth and surplus labor for military and governance needs. supplemented these grains, particularly in wetter microzones, yielding fibers for local textiles and tools forged from abundant lateritic iron ores. Iron smelting, practiced by specialized blacksmith guilds, produced hoes, sickles, and weapons, enhancing productivity and defensibility amid regional threats; oral traditions even portray these artisans as semi-mystical figures whose control over ore Mossi rulers historically curtailed to consolidate power. The upper and its tributaries offered supplementary resources like seasonal fishing and clay for , though in the necessitated dependence on wells and reservoirs. Settlement patterns emphasized dispersed rural compounds clustered around arable plots, with denser in administrative centers to facilitate control and defense. Major towns, such as those in and Yatenga, featured earthen walls and ditches, strategically positioned on the open plateau to leverage mobility against incursions from northern nomads and slave raiders, rather than isolated hilltops which were less prevalent in the flat terrain. This configuration balanced agricultural access with , as fortified cores protected granaries and elites while satellite villages exploited fragmented fields, adapting causally to the savanna's vulnerability to drought-induced and external predation.

Origins and Early Development

Theories of Migration and Ethnic Roots

The dominant theory of Mossi attributes their emergence to waves of migration by equestrian warrior groups from the Dagbon and Mamprugu regions of present-day northern , occurring primarily between the 11th and 15th centuries CE. These migrants, affiliated with the Mamprusi and Dagomba (Mole-Dagbane) peoples, moved northward and westward into the central Plateau of modern , leveraging cavalry tactics to subjugate indigenous farming communities. This pattern aligns with broader intra-African migrations driven by resource competition and political fragmentation in the Volta Basin, where centralized polities expanded via rather than mass displacement. Linguistic evidence strongly supports this migratory origin, as the Mossi language belongs to the Oti-Volta subgroup of the Gur (Voltaic) family, sharing close lexical and grammatical affinities with Dagomba and Mamprusi tongues—deviations arising from localized evolution rather than independent development. Archaeological correlates are limited but include ironworking sites and fortified settlements in the Mouhoun Bend indicating southward technological and demographic flows from Gur-speaking heartlands around 1000–1400 CE, consistent with the establishment of stratified societies. Genetic analyses further reveal Mossi populations forming distinct clusters within Gur-speaking groups, with paternal lineages showing admixture from eastern Voltaic sources overlaid on local maternal mtDNA profiles, suggesting male-driven assimilation over wholesale replacement. Ethnic roots reflect a synthesis of migrant conquerors and subdued autochthons, such as the Gurunsi and other non-centralized Voltaic groups, through processes of intermarriage, extraction, and cultural imposition. The Mossi preserved endogamous practices and titled hierarchies imported from Mamprusi-Dagomba precedents, while incorporating indigenous labor and rituals into a hybrid identity—evident in persistent linguistic Gur substrata and localized clan mythologies. This integration fostered resilience against later disruptions, though it also perpetuated internal divisions between "pure" Mossi nobility and tributary ethnic units, as documented in pre-colonial genealogies. Alternative theories proposing deeper indigenous evolution without external influx lack substantiation from or , yielding to the migration model as the parsimonious explanation grounded in cross-verified Volta Basin dynamics.

Founding Legends and Initial Settlements

According to Mossi oral traditions, the foundational legend centers on Yennenga, a who rejected an and fled her homeland, eventually partnering with a local hunter named Riale to bear a son named Ouedraogo, whose name signifies "stallion" in the language and symbolizes strength and leadership. Ouedraogo is depicted as the progenitor of the Mossi ruling lineage, establishing the first kingdom at Tenkodogo through alliances and assertion of authority over local groups, with the narrative emphasizing paternal descent as the basis for legitimacy rather than maternal origins. This legend extends to the founding of , where Ouedraogo's descendants, led by figures like Naaba Ouedraogo, consolidated power around 1441, transforming a settlement into the central Mossi capital through strategic alliances and control of fertile plateau lands. While the precise date derives from later genealogical reconstructions of oral histories, it aligns with archaeological indications of organized settlements in the region by the early , predating broader expansions. The narrative's focus on Ouedraogo's patrilineal heritage underscores causal elements of dynastic continuity, where leadership derived from traceable male lines enabled stable rule amid environmental pressures like seasonal flooding. Initial Mossi settlements emerged as decentralized chiefdoms in the late , comprising small agro-pastoral communities that integrated incoming elites with indigenous farmers, evolving into proto-kingdoms via kinship-based rather than wholesale at this stage. Patrilineal clans, tracing descent from legendary figures like Ouedraogo, provided the ideological framework for authority, with modern Mossi genealogies preserving lists of up to 30 generations that correlate with linguistic and settlement patterns, offering empirical anchors for these traditions despite their mythic elements. These clans legitimized rule by invoking ancestral precedents, fostering cohesion in dispersed villages before centralized monarchies solidified.

Rise and Expansion

Key Conquests and Military Foundations (15th-16th Centuries)

The Mossi states established military dominance in the 15th and 16th centuries through forces reliant on imported from Sahelian regions and locally bred in areas like Yatenga, granting superiority over foes in open engagements. This equestrian foundation, adapted to regional grasslands, facilitated rapid strikes and control over expansive territories, underpinning expansions and defenses. Southward conquests targeted Gurunsi and other Gur-speaking groups, with Mossi conducting raids that imposed and slave extraction by circa 1500, extending influence into forested fringes without uniform subjugation. These operations leveraged mobility to overwhelm decentralized societies, establishing networks that bolstered Mossi economic and military resources. Against incursions led by Askia Muhammad from the late 1490s to early 1500s, Mossi forces repelled full conquest through guerrilla methods exploiting rivers, forests, and terrain familiarity, maintaining independence despite 's numerical and organizational edges. Such defenses preserved Mossi sovereignty amid pressures from the expansive , highlighting tactical adaptability over conventional battles.

Establishment of Core Kingdoms (Ouagadougou, Yatenga, and Others)

The core Mossi kingdoms crystallized in the Volta Basin during the , marking the transition from migratory warrior bands to structured polities with defined administrative centers. emerged as the paramount kingdom, serving as the seat of the Moro-Naba, the senior ruler whose authority symbolized spiritual and ritual primacy over the Mossi domain. This centralization in facilitated coordinated defense and tribute collection, yet preserved local autonomy to mitigate risks from dynastic disputes or external incursions. Yatenga, located in the northern reaches, developed as a semi-autonomous counterpart, founded by Yedega, a son of an early Moro-Naba of Ouagadougou, which allowed it to function with relative independence while maintaining fraternal ties to the south. This separation enabled Yatenga to adapt to drier, pastoral environments, fostering specialized cavalry forces that complemented Ouagadougou's agrarian base. Smaller kingdoms, such as Tenkodogo and Fada N'gourma, operated as strategic buffers or allies, with Tenkodogo retaining elder status from earlier settlements and Fada N'gourma anchoring eastern frontiers against Gurma influences. The decentralized federation model inherent to these core kingdoms promoted resilience, as power diffused across multiple Naba (rulers) prevented the collapse of one center from destabilizing the entire system. Administrative innovations, including appointed provincial governors (Tengdemba) loyal to individual kingdoms rather than a singular overlord, ensured stable revenue from and raids without over-reliance on Ouagadougou's court. This structure, evident by circa 1500, balanced hierarchy with fragmentation, allowing the Mossi to withstand Songhai expansions and internal successions that plagued more unitary states.

Political Organization

Centralized Monarchy and Succession

The Mossi kingdoms featured a centralized monarchy embodied by the Naba, with the Mogho Naba of Ouagadougou holding paramount authority among the core states of Ouagadougou, Yatenga, and Tenkodogo. The ruler's legitimacy stemmed from naam, a supernatural essence conferring the capacity to govern, ritually activated through installation ceremonies that linked the king to ancestral and spiritual forces. These rituals, including ancestor veneration and the na’basega harvest festival, underscored the divine kingship's role in maintaining cosmic and social order, distinct from the spiritual oversight of earth priests (tengsoba). Succession followed patrilineal principles, selecting successors from the deceased ruler's male lineage—typically a son or close relative—whose eligibility was confirmed by evident possession of naam. Regency mechanisms, involving councils of nobles and advisors, governed interregnums or periods of minority rule, preventing power vacuums and resolving potential fraternal rivalries among senior princes through deliberative processes. Power distribution mitigated absolutism via a structured court of officials responsible for key functions, such as command and sectoral administration, alongside the tengsoba's capacity to withhold support—essential for and —against monarchical overreach. This dual political-spiritual framework enforced accountability without fragmenting central authority. The system's causal resilience is evidenced by the dynasties' endurance for over 500 years, from circa the 11th–15th centuries until French subjugation in 1896–1897, sustaining coherent rule amid recurrent wars and resisting Islamic expansions that destabilized neighbors like the Songhay or fragmented polities in the Volta basin. Such derived from naam-validated combined with institutional checks, fostering stability absent in less centralized regional competitors prone to succession wars or .

Administrative Hierarchy and Provincial Control

The Mossi kingdoms maintained a dualistic administrative structure dividing political authority among the nakombse—the conquering noble class descended from the founding migrants—and spiritual authority among the tengbiise, the indigenous landholders whose earth priests (tengsoba or tengdemba) custodianship of fertility rituals checked royal overreach. This division enforced central control by requiring the Mogho Naba (king of Ouagadougou) and subordinate rulers to secure ritual validation from tengsoba for land use and oaths, integrating local customs into provincial governance while subordinating them to nakombse oversight. Provinces, known as tenge, were governed by nakombse appointees, often royal sons titled dimas, who supervised chiefs responsible for clusters of villages and enforced tributary obligations from chiefs in peripheral dependencies. chiefs, numbering in the dozens per kingdom, each oversaw approximately 20 village chiefs, forming a layered that mobilized resources through loyalty oaths binding to political rather than outright . chiefs in buffer states like Fada N'Gurma remitted in goods such as and , sustaining central without direct taxation, as provinces retained subsistence autonomy under nakombse supervision. Judicial administration blended nakombse enforcement with tengdemba mediation, where village chiefs adjudicated routine disputes but deferred to earth priests for cases invoking land sanctity or communal oaths, ensuring customary practices from pre-conquest groups persisted as a stabilizing force under centralized rule. This system promoted efficiency by localizing minor justice while escalating appeals to court officials in the capital, where the king's naam—a emblem of authority—ultimately ratified decisions, tying provincial loyalty to the core kingdoms' stability from the onward.

Economic Foundations

Agriculture and Subsistence Economy

The agriculture of the Mossi Kingdoms relied primarily on rain-fed cultivation of millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) as staple crops, which formed the basis of caloric intake and supported dense populations in the savanna zones of central Burkina Faso. These cereals were grown on cleared fields using hoe-based tillage, with yields typically ranging from 700 to 900 kg per hectare on initially fertile soils before productivity declined due to nutrient depletion. Crop rotation incorporated periods of fallow to restore soil fertility, allowing fields to regenerate amid the region's variable rainfall of 800–1,100 mm annually, though prolonged dry spells necessitated communal monitoring of soil quality for sustainable yields. Livestock rearing complemented cropping through cattle (Bos indicus) herds, which provided milk, meat, and for field enrichment, though Mossi farmers often entrusted to specialized Fulbe pastoralists to avoid damage from . This integration enhanced subsistence resilience, as cattle dung improved and content, linking mobility to sedentary farming in a system where animal traction was limited but draft oxen occasionally aided plowing. Cottage industries such as iron smelting and production bolstered self-sufficiency by supplying tools for and household needs. Ironworking, conducted by endogamous castes using furnaces, produced hoes, sickles, and weapons from local ores, with archaeological evidence from sites like Korsimoro indicating large-scale heaps from pre-colonial operations that supported farming efficiency. , typically crafted by women from clay deposits, yielded storage jars and cooking vessels essential for grain preservation, enabling kinship-based labor groups to stockpile harvests in elevated granaries against seasonal shortages and periodic droughts. Labor was organized seasonally around units, with men clearing and hoeing fields during the (June–October) and women processing harvests, a structure that distributed risks and minimized through diversified plots and communal storage practices documented in Mossi plateau farming systems. This subsistence framework sustained the kingdoms' hierarchical societies by tying to management, where soil exhaustion prompted village relocation or intensification via application rather than expansive for resources.

Trade Routes and Regional Commerce

The Mossi kingdoms occupied a strategic position in the Volta Basin, controlling trade routes that linked the Sahelian grasslands to the north with forested zones to the south, enabling trans-regional exchange without heavy dependence on coastal or trans-Saharan networks. This inland location, removed from the River's great bend where earlier empires like , , and Songhay dominated, allowed the Mossi states to develop self-contained focused on regional goods. Principal imports included salt from northern Sahelian sources, essential for preservation and diet, and kola nuts procured from southern areas, valued as a in social and contexts. In exchange, the Mossi exported livestock such as and donkeys, alongside cloth produced in distinctive large, strip-woven forms that served as a and . These commodities sustained internal economies and supported accumulation, with volumes sufficient to underpin and administrative structures from the 15th century onward. Royal capitals like hosted sizable markets integrated with artisan workshops and long-distance caravans, where state oversight ensured collection of tolls and tariffs to bolster fiscal . This regulatory framework minimized vulnerability to external disruptions, as evidenced by the Mossi kingdoms' resistance to incorporation into larger Islamic trading spheres, preserving political amid regional . Historical accounts confirm that such measures fostered internal wealth generation, distinguishing Mossi from dependency models seen in neighboring states.

Engagement with Slavery and Labor Systems

The Mossi kingdoms incorporated war captives into domestic slavery systems, primarily utilizing them for agricultural labor on farms and household service. These captives, often drawn from conflicts with neighboring groups such as the Gurunsi, were integrated into Mossi society as servile dependents rather than chattel commodities for mass export. Unlike coastal West African states that profited from large-scale slave exports to European traders, the Mossi kingdoms largely resisted participation in the trans-Saharan and Atlantic slave trades, limiting enslavement to internal needs and defying demands from expansive Islamic empires. This stance preserved their population from depletion, as Mossi forces successfully repelled slave raids by the and Songhai empires, which sought captives for northern markets. Within Mossi society, functioned as a subordinate labor mechanism rather than a primary economic driver, with captives often achieving or social elevation through prolonged service, loyalty, or integration into kin networks, reflecting broader pre-colonial African patterns where enslavement was tied to rather than perpetual heredity. This internal system contrasted sharply with export-oriented economies elsewhere, enabling the Mossi to maintain demographic stability and military strength amid regional pressures.

Military Structure and Warfare

Cavalry Tactics and Armaments

The Mossi kingdoms' centered on as the primary force, introduced in the fifteenth century by conquering groups from the Mamprusi region, which enabled the establishment and expansion of states like and Yatenga. Horses, critical to this system, were imported from northern Hausa territories and subsequently bred locally to maintain supplies despite environmental challenges in the savanna-woodland zone. This adaptation allowed for sustained mounted warfare, distinguishing Mossi forces from infantry-dependent neighbors. Armaments for Mossi emphasized lightweight equipment suited to rapid operations, including iron spears and lances produced by local blacksmiths using regionally smelted , often paired with small shields for defense. Some lances and arrows were tipped with poison from plants, enhancing lethality in close engagements. These weapons supported a of skirmishing rather than prolonged , with avoiding heavy armor to preserve speed in the region's terrain. Tactics leveraged cavalry mobility for intelligence-gathering, surprise assaults, and outmaneuvering foes, particularly in small-scale raids where speed disrupted enemy formations. Against infantry-heavy adversaries, Mossi riders executed hit-and-run maneuvers, exploiting local knowledge to harass and withdraw before counterattacks, often securing victories disproportionate to numerical strength. This approach, rooted in the primacy of mounted forces, sustained Mossi dominance through repeated engagements in the fifteenth to nineteenth centuries.

Strategies of Defense and Expansion

The Mossi kingdoms defended against northern threats from the and Songhai empires by exploiting their southern location in the savanna-forest transition zone, where dense vegetation hindered large cavalry maneuvers favored by invaders. Instead of direct confrontations, Mossi forces conducted targeted raids and ambushes on enemy caravans and garrisons, disrupting and without committing to open battles. This adaptive emphasized mobility and attrition, allowing the Mossi to repel major incursions, such as Songhai campaigns under Askia Muhammad in the early , where despite temporary setbacks, core territories remained unsubdued. Local settlements featured fortifications and early warning systems to counter raids from slavers or rival groups, enabling rapid mobilization and denial of resources to aggressors through dispersal of populations and when threats loomed. These measures, combined with the kingdoms' decentralized structure, sustained autonomy amid jihadist expansions, as evidenced by the Mossi's persistent raiding of trans-Saharan routes even after Songhai's peak under around 1490. Expansion proceeded through the founding of subsidiary kingdoms and extraction of tribute from conquered Gur-speaking groups, rather than intensive direct governance, which preserved military focus on frontiers and avoided overextension across ecologically diverse terrains. By the , this yielded a confederation of states like and Yatenga, exerting influence over trade corridors without absorbing all subjects administratively. The approach secured centuries of relative independence until French in 1896, marred primarily by intermittent fratricidal conflicts over succession that occasionally invited external probes.

Social and Cultural Framework

Hierarchical Social Order

The Mossi Kingdoms maintained a stratified divided into royalty at the apex, followed by nobles (nakombse), free commoners, guilds, and slaves at the base, with this hierarchy ensuring functional stability through assigned roles in governance, production, and labor. The nakombse, tracing descent from the conquering founders of the kingdoms around the 11th-15th centuries, monopolized high offices and land rights, reinforcing elite cohesion via preferential that limited intermarriage with lower strata. Free commoners, comprising the majority as independent farmers, tilled communal and familial lands, while slaves—often war captives—provided coerced agricultural and domestic labor without rights to mobility or . Patrilineal descent formed the core of , with lineages aggregated into clans sharing a common male , dictating of , tools, and among male heirs, though daughters occasionally accessed movable goods in practice. Artisan groups, including blacksmiths and potters, operated as semi-autonomous, endogamous descent-based units in some regions, specializing in ironworking and ceramics while residing in designated villages to supply the and fulfill functions tied to their hereditary expertise. Gender divisions reinforced the , with men predominating in political administration, provincial oversight, and command, while women focused on subsistence farming, millet , and localized market exchanges on fields nominally under patrilineal male control. This delineation minimized overlap in , channeling women's economic contributions into and sustenance without challenging patrilineal succession.

Customs, Kinship, and Daily Practices

Mossi kinship was patrilineal and patrilocal, with descent traced through male lines and extended families forming the core social unit. Villages consisted of compounds housing multiple nuclear families linked by lineage, where senior males, often as household heads (zaka), coordinated collective activities such as labor sharing and resource pooling through systems like pugkêenga, involving joint cultivation of fields and granaries for mutual aid against scarcity. Marriage was typically arranged by family heads or lineage chiefs, exogamous at the local descent group (buduu) level, with bridewealth payments in cattle or trade goods exchanged to formalize unions and foster reciprocal obligations between kin groups, extending support networks across villages. Daily life revolved around gendered routines in rural compounds, which featured round huts with thatched roofs clustered around courtyards enclosed by mud walls, including a western-facing for communal resting and greetings. Men and older boys managed primary field labor from approximately 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., cattle herding, and heavier tasks, while women and girls handled supplementary plots (beolga), firewood gathering, (dolo) , and household chores; children contributed by tending or assisting in crafts. Elaborate greetings marked social interactions, involving prolonged handshakes and claps to announce arrivals, reflecting for age and status hierarchies within kin. included women's weaving for wrapped skirts and men's embroidered robes, alongside specialized crafts like by certain clans, leatherworking, and blacksmithing for tools and jewelry, often practiced by families within villages. Initiation rites for boys involved performed in bush camps lasting 90 to 100 days, during which participants learned practical societal roles through supervised activities, with full adulthood attained via . The Basega in celebrated the through communal gatherings emphasizing ties. Oral histories and wisdom were transmitted via specialized singers (griots) and folktales, proverbs, and praise recitations that reinforced family lineages and cooperative norms across generations.

Religious Beliefs and Practices

Ancestor Worship and

The Mossi religious system centered on ancestor veneration, where deceased patrilineal forebears were believed to influence the living's prosperity and conduct, with rituals involving animal sacrifices such as chickens at ancestral graves conducted by the household's senior male to seek protection and guidance. Ancestral shrines, often consisting of inverted pottery bowls containing sacred plants and objects, were maintained in households and honored annually during the post-harvest festival to reinforce lineage continuity and communal harmony. These practices underscored the ancestors' role in upholding moral order, with oaths sworn at such sites to bind social obligations. Central to Mossi animism were earth shrines known as tenga, sacred locations such as trees or rock outcrops tied to family land, serving as repositories for and sites for sacrifices to ensure , rainfall, and agricultural bounty. The tengsoba, or earth priests descended from original land settlers, acted as primary mediators between the living, ancestors, and spirits, performing rituals that invoked Tenga—the associated with , , and natural forces—while holding spiritual authority parallel to yet distinct from the political power of Mossi rulers. These priests' interventions, including offerings of , flour, or fowl at earthen altars, were essential for resolving disputes over and , reflecting an worldview where spirits inhabited and governed environmental elements like , , and soil. Ethnographic accounts confirm the persistence of these localized cults, which integrated of lesser entities to maintain ecological and social equilibrium without centralized temples. Divination practices complemented these beliefs, with specialists such as baga diviners employing traditional instruments like iron clappers or possibly cowries and wands—methods common in the Volta Basin—to interpret omens from ancestors or spirits for guidance on personal, agricultural, or communal decisions, thereby embedding causal foresight into daily governance and . This system reinforced social cohesion by attributing outcomes to ancestral approval or natural disequilibrium, with rituals avoiding direct invocation of a remote high creator in favor of immediate, empirically oriented spirit mediation.

Resistance to Islamic Influence and Syncretism

The Mossi ruling elites consistently rejected , prioritizing the fusion of political authority with indigenous religious rituals that derived legitimacy from earth shrines (tenga) and ancestral spirits, which would have been undermined by Islamic . This stance persisted despite proximity to Muslim trading networks from the and Songhai empires, where Dyula merchants introduced Islamic commerce but faced exclusion from core power structures. Mossi kings, known as Mogho Naaba, enforced policies barring Muslim proselytization among the , viewing it as a threat to the centralized hierarchy built on non-Islamic cosmology. Military defenses played a key role in repelling Islamic expansionist pressures, including jihads from Sahelian polities; for instance, Mossi forces defeated Songhai incursions in the and later withstood 19th-century Fulani jihadist probes from the Sokoto Caliphate's fringes, maintaining territorial integrity without territorial concessions to Islamic rule. Although specific 18th-century jihad records against Mossi states are sparse, the kingdoms' fortified capitals and mobile horsemen enabled proactive raids northward, disrupting Muslim supply lines and discouraging sustained campaigns southward. This empirical success in deterrence—evidenced by the absence of Mossi vassalage to caliphates—contrasted with the Islamization of neighboring Bambara and Hausa states. Syncretism remained superficial and confined to peripheral urban enclaves, where Muslim traders formed zongos (foreigner quarters) for economic exchange but exercised no influence over state rituals or succession. Rulers tolerated these communities for access to trans-Saharan goods like salt and cloth, yet prohibited intermarriage with elites and restricted Islamic preaching, ensuring that court ceremonies invoked only local deities. Historians note this selective accommodation fostered adaptive resilience, allowing Mossi states to extract from Muslim caravan routes without , though some contemporary observers critiqued it as economically insular given Islam's role in broader West African integration. By the late , over seven centuries of such resistance had preserved a distinct ethnic-religious identity, with conversion rates among the populace below 5% until French colonial disruptions.

External Relations and Conflicts

Wars with Sahelian Empires (Mali, Songhai)

The Mossi kingdoms engaged in protracted conflicts with the throughout the , successfully repelling Malian incursions into their southern territories and launching raids that eroded Mali's eastern frontiers. As Mali's power waned under weaker rulers following Mansa Musa's era, Mossi exploited the empire's overextension, conducting aggressive strikes that contributed to the loss of peripheral provinces around 1400. These engagements demonstrated Mossi martial efficacy, as their forces prevented full incorporation into the Malian sphere despite the latter's numerical superiority in and archers. In the 15th and early 16th centuries, similar confrontations arose with the rising , particularly under (r. 1493–1528), whose jihadist campaigns sought to extend Islamic hegemony southward. Mossi rulers, centered in and Yatenga, mounted effective defenses, forcing Songhai retreats during expeditions between 1477 and 1498, amid broader hostilities from 1328 to 1333. Although Songhai achieved tactical successes in some border skirmishes, such as near the Niger Bend, Mossi resistance—bolstered by unified command structures and refusal to submit to tribute demands—ensured the kingdoms' autonomy, with no lasting conquests. These wars stemmed causally from Sahelian empires' pursuit of resources, slaves, and religious expansion into fertile Mossi highlands, met by defenders leveraging terrain familiarity for ambushes and rapid maneuvers. Mossi chroniclers and oral traditions portray these victories as preservations of ancestral sovereignty against foreign domination, while some modern analyses frame the resistance as a barrier to pan-regional Islamic networks, though empirical outcomes affirm the Mossi strategy's success in sustaining independence until the .

Interactions with Southern and Coastal Powers

The Mossi kingdoms engaged in southward raids primarily targeting Gurunsi communities from the onward, with forces capturing slaves and compelling payments, though Gurunsi resistance—characterized by decentralized village defenses and guerrilla tactics—prevented sustained conquest or incorporation into Mossi hierarchies. These incursions exploited the savanna-woodland transition but yielded only intermittent gains, as Gurunsi groups maintained autonomy despite periodic subjugation attempts. Diplomatic and commercial ties with more distant southern powers, such as the Gonja state in northern and Akan polities further south, centered on indirect trade routes exchanging northern goods like and salt for , kola nuts, and forest products, often mediated through Dyula merchants in Gonja territories by the . Such interactions remained pragmatic and non-alliance-based, avoiding military pacts amid mutual suspicions, with Mossi rulers leveraging Gonja intermediaries to access Akan markets without venturing into densely forested zones unsuitable for horse-mounted operations. Direct entanglement with coastal Atlantic trade networks was minimal, as Mossi states resisted exporting captives southward into European-dominated slave systems, sustaining instead and defying coastal demands until the late . This stance reflected strategic caution, as the ecological barrier of southern rainforests curtailed effectiveness and incentivized internal stability over risky coastal ventures.

Decline and Colonial Era

19th-Century Internal Strains and External Pressures

Throughout the , the Mossi kingdoms contended with internal succession disputes that fragmented authority and incited sporadic conflicts between states, weakening coordinated defense against external threats. These disputes arose from the centralized yet rigid practices, where claims by royal kin often escalated into warfare or for rivals, as seen in where claimant Boukary Koutou resided in near Bassawarga until his installation as Mogho Naba in 1890. Such divisions eroded the unity that had historically sustained Mossi resilience against northern expansions. Periodic environmental stresses, including droughts characteristic of the Sahelian-savanna transition zone, compounded these internal frailties by triggering that disrupted agricultural production and intensified resource competition, prompting localized raids and migrations. While specific Mossi famine records from the period are sparse, the broader regional cycles, such as those affecting neighboring Sahelian polities in the mid-19th century, likely strained the kingdoms' subsistence economies reliant on millet and cultivation. This vulnerability highlighted limitations in , where entrenched traditions prioritized ritual and hierarchical stability over innovations in water management or crop diversification. Externally, nomadic Fulani groups exerted pressure through southward migrations and raids into Mossi farmlands, clashing over grazing rights in the central plateau and disrupting settled agriculture. These interactions, longstanding in the Mossi-Fulbe contact zones of Yatenga and Boussouma, escalated in the 19th century amid Fulani expansions following northern jihads, though Mossi forces repelled major conquests. Concurrently, European explorers pierced Mossi territories, with Gottlob Adolf Krause traversing the region in 1886 and Louis-Gustave Binger reaching Ouagadougou in 1888 after journeying from the Niger River, documenting political structures and geography that informed subsequent colonial strategies. Binger's accounts emphasized the kingdoms' military organization, including cavalry units, yet underscored their isolation from coastal trade networks. Despite these pressures, Mossi institutions demonstrated durability, with cavalry-based warfare enabling survival against raiders and explorers alike; critiques of cultural rigidity for impeding firearms adoption or alliances overlook the causal success of decentralized yet cohesive resistance that preserved until the . The interplay of dynastic instability and ecological limits, rather than inherent decadence as sometimes portrayed in colonial narratives, constituted the primary weakenings, separable from later dynamics.

French Military Campaigns (1896-1903) and Incorporation

French forces established a over the Yatenga Mossi state in 1895 through negotiations with its ruler Naaba Yadega, leveraging longstanding rivalries between Yatenga and to divide Mossi opposition. In September 1896, Lieutenant Paul Voulet led a column into , the central Mossi capital, where Mogho Naba Boukary Kutu (also called Wobgo) mounted armed resistance with his cavalry forces. Mossi warriors employed traditional effective against regional foes, but French troops' modern rifles and disciplined formations proved decisive, inflicting heavy casualties and compelling retreats. Boukary Kutu was defeated, fled southward, and was ultimately exiled to the Gold Coast (modern ); a formal in 1897 recognized French protectorate status over Mossi territories centered on . Holdouts persisted in Yatenga and peripheral Mossi areas, where local rulers rejected full submission until subdued by sustained French patrols and punitive expeditions by 1903, completing military incorporation into and Upper Senegal-Niger administrative units. Post-conquest governance adopted , retaining Mossi chiefly structures for local administration and tribute collection under French oversight, though this arrangement progressively undermined rulers' autonomy through imposed taxes, forced labor requisitions, and veto power over succession.

Legacy

Persistence of Mossi Institutions Post-Conquest

Following the French conquest of the Mossi Kingdoms between 1896 and 1903, colonial authorities implemented elements of by co-opting traditional Mossi chiefs, including the Moro-Naba, to facilitate administration and maintain social order, rather than fully dismantling pre-existing hierarchies. This approach was formalized with the creation of the Upper Volta territory in , where chiefs were integrated as salaried auxiliaries responsible for local , collection, and economic oversight, preserving their authority in ceremonial and customary matters despite oversight from French administrators. The Moro-Naba retained a symbolic role in rituals and functions, which continued uninterrupted and reinforced Mossi , even as political power was curtailed; for instance, traditional ceremonies persisted as markers of legitimacy, countering narratives of complete institutional erasure. Resistance to direct French impositions, such as the of 1915–1917 involving up to 20,000 fighters across Mossi and neighboring areas, underscored efforts to safeguard autonomy and traditional structures against exploitative labor demands and territorial fragmentation. These uprisings, though suppressed, contributed to the adaptive resilience of chieftaincy by highlighting the limits of colonial disruption and prompting pragmatic accommodations. Post-independence in , initial policies under the First Republic diminished chiefly and introduced elections for some roles, yet a 1966 coup rehabilitated their status, restoring influence in local governance and . Empirical continuity is evident in regions like Kaya, where Mossi hierarchies—spanning village, district, canton, and provincial levels—endure, managing social organization and customary trade pacts, as supported by the 1991 Constitution's recognition of traditional authorities amid modern state structures. This persistence reflects the pragmatic utility of chieftaincy for stability, with Mossi kings wielding informal sway through ethnic demographic dominance, comprising over 50% of Burkina Faso's .

Influence on Modern Burkina Faso and Cultural Identity

The Mossi, constituting approximately 52% of 's population, form the ethnic core shaping the country's political dynamics and state identity. Traditional Mossi leaders, led by the Mogho Naba in , maintain advisory and mediatory roles in governance, leveraging moral authority to bridge state institutions and communities. For instance, during the 2014 military coup and subsequent 2015 crisis, Mogho Naba Baongo II hosted faction leaders to negotiate peaceful resolutions, averting broader conflict. This influence persisted into the , where traditional rulers, including Mossi chiefs, support informal efforts and local stability amid jihadist insurgencies displacing over two million since 2015, providing resilience against central government's overreach. Historical tensions between Mossi traditionalism and modern centralization peaked during Thomas Sankara's 1983–1987 regime, when socialist reforms targeted "feudal" chiefly powers, sparking resistance from Mossi elites who viewed them as eroding ancestral hierarchies. Sankara, of Mossi descent, acknowledged intra-Mossi divisions but prioritized revolutionary restructuring over customary federal-like balances. Post-Sankara, policies since the 1990s integrated traditional chiefs into local administration for , , and development, reflecting the Mossi kingdoms' pre-colonial model of semi-autonomous principalities under overarching Mogho Naba —a layered that fostered regional resilience against external threats like Sahelian empires. This structure contrasts with centralized failures elsewhere in , where rigid exacerbated fragility, as evidenced by Burkina's chiefs aiding interethnic cohesion despite Fulani-Mossi clashes fueled by insecurity. Culturally, Mossi heritage anchors national identity through the Moré language, spoken by over half the populace, and enduring rituals like the weekly Moro-Naba ceremony, which symbolizes unity via mock war councils and ancestral homage, performed consistently since pre-colonial times. The annual Basega festival, a millet-harvest thanksgiving invoking earth spirits and ancestors, reinforces communal bonds and agricultural ethos amid urbanization. In the 2020s, these practices have seen revivals as cultural bulwarks against instability, with traditional councils promoting Mossi oral histories and masked dances to sustain identity in displaced communities, underscoring the kingdoms' legacy of adaptive, non-Islamized governance.

References

  1. https://ehrafworldcultures.yale.edu/cultures/FA28/summary
  2. https://www.everyculture.com/wc/Brazil-to-Congo-Republic-of/Mossi.html
  3. https://oxfordre.com/africanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277734-e-1354
  4. http://aero-comlab.stanford.edu/jameson/world_history/A_Short_History_of_Africa.pdf
  5. https://2009-2017.state.gov/outofdate/bgn/burkinafaso/125482.htm
  6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227659737_Local_Perceptions_and_Regional_Climate_Trends_on_the_Central_Plateau_of_Burkina_Faso
  7. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hic3.12316
  8. https://thinkafrica.net/mossi-kingdoms/
  9. https://travelinspires.org/burkina-faso-history-understand-the-country-better/
  10. https://era.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/14226/Niang2011.pdf
  11. https://pdfproc.lib.msu.edu/?file=/DMC/African%2BJournals/pdfs/Institue%2Bof%2BAfrican%2BStudies%2BResearch%2BReview/1971v7n2/asrv007002007.pdf
  12. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781580467285-002/html
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4915815/
  14. https://www.dw.com/en/princess-yennenga-ancestor-of-the-mossi-people-of-burkina-faso/a-56976104
  15. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000230124
  16. https://rightforeducation.org/2024/04/05/the-mogho-naaba-and-his-court/
  17. https://afrolegends.com/2018/05/28/why-the-name-ouagadougou/
  18. https://www.oxfordreference.com/viewbydoi/10.1093/acref/9780195337709.013.3027
  19. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10814-024-09201-w
  20. https://blackpast.org/global-african-history/ouagadougou-burkina-faso-15th-century/
  21. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/language-and-linguistics/mossi-people
  22. https://www.africanhistoryextra.com/p/knights-of-the-sahara-a-history-of
  23. https://www.gateway-africa.com/tribe/mossi_tribe.html
  24. https://africanartists.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-influece-of-burkina-faso-in-works.html
  25. https://asaaseradio.com/the-mossi-kingdoms-centuries-of-resilience-and-tradition-in-burkina-faso/
  26. https://human.libretexts.org/Courses/Lumen_Learning/Book%253A_History_of_World_Civilization_II-2_%28Lumen%29/04%253A_2%253A_African_Slave_Trade/04.7%253A_African_Participation_and_Resistance_to_Trade
  27. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004641174/B9789004641174_s007.pdf
  28. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED066993.pdf
  29. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/xmqd-ff85/download
  30. https://www.aegis-eu.org/archive/ecas2007/papers/65-102-Breusers-Mark_Fulbe-in-Mossi-history-towards-a-translocal-perspective-for-understanding-a-West-African-society.pdf
  31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/179567
  32. https://www.101lasttribes.com/tribes/mossi.html
  33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44126739
  34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/161788
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7314720/
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440319300640
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308939613_The_Massive_Production_of_Iron_in_the_Sahelian_Belt_Archaeological_Investigations_at_Korsimoro_Sanmatenga_-_Burkina_Faso
  38. https://oxfordre.com/africanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277734-e-140
  39. https://www.thoughtco.com/african-slave-traders-44538
  40. https://escholarship.org/content/qt72k2n7m2/qt72k2n7m2.pdf
  41. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/6169321E7F4F0D4169DD31E0C47C2A8E/S0021853700010653a.pdf/late_nineteenthcentury_military_technology_in_upper_volta1.pdf
  42. https://sahistory.org.za/sites/default/files/archive-files3/david_c._conrad_empires_of_medieval_west_africabook4me.org_.pdf
  43. https://ldhi.library.cofc.edu/exhibits/show/africanpassageslowcountryadapt/introductionatlanticworld/african_participation_and_resi
  44. https://www.doe.virginia.gov/teaching-learning-assessment/k-12-standards-instruction/history-and-social-science/instructional-resources/history
  45. https://oxfordre.com/africanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277734-e-614
  46. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000134377
  47. https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1063&context=econ
  48. https://repository.arizona.edu/bitstream/handle/10150/195139/azu_etd_1829_sip1_m.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  49. https://www.everyculture.com/Africa-Middle-East/Mossi-Religion-and-Expressive-Culture.html
  50. https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences-and-law/anthropology-and-archaeology/people/mossi
  51. https://sk.sagepub.com/ency/edvol/africanreligion/chpt/mossi
  52. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DO1uIaC-hM0
  53. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01840752/document
  54. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004233133/B9789004233133_003.pdf
  55. https://funci.org/the-spread-of-islam-in-ancient-africa/?lang=en
  56. https://africame.factsanddetails.com/article/entry-255.html
  57. https://rightforeducation.org/2018/01/25/mossi-kingdoms/
  58. https://mershoncenter.osu.edu/research-projects/gun-and-rosary-peaceful-jihad-sheikh-boubacar-sawadogo-and-french-colonialism
  59. https://islam.domains.uflib.ufl.edu/s/bf/item/15405
  60. https://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/africa/features/storyofafrica/4chapter3.shtml
  61. http://jjcweb.jjay.cuny.edu/history/worldspring09/mali.html
  62. https://www.101lasttribes.com/tribes/gurunsi.html
  63. http://moledagbon.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-history-of-navrongo.html
  64. https://www.zyama.com/gurunsi/
  65. https://countrystudies.us/ghana/5.htm
  66. https://research-portal.uu.nl/files/125293507/European_travellers_to_Central_West_Africa_in_the_19th_century.pdf
  67. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/africa/history-1.htm
  68. https://www.worldstatesmen.org/Burkina_Faso_native.html
  69. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5809&context=etd
  70. https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=econ
  71. https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/125821/bk-country-profiles-burkina-faso-part5-010190-en.pdf?sequence=22&isAllowed=y
  72. https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/context/econ/article/1074/viewcontent/Kevane_Dim_Delobsom.pdf
  73. https://commission-on-legal-pluralism.com/system/commission-on-legal-pluralism/volumes/37-38/ouedraogo-art.pdf
  74. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-13072774
  75. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1998-jun-14-mn-59735-story.html
  76. https://www.indexmundi.com/burkina_faso/demographics_profile.html
  77. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-34340704
  78. https://jsouapplicationstorage.blob.core.windows.net/press/40/20-3.pdf
  79. https://www.liberationschool.org/thomas-sankara-defending-the-revolution/
  80. https://dipec.wp.unisi.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2014/07/Art.-Ouedraogo.pdf
  81. https://bti-project.org/en/reports/country-report/BFA
  82. https://travelinspires.org/burkina-faso-traditions-discover-what-they-are/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.