Recent from talks
Knowledge base stats:
Talk channels stats:
Members stats:
Nash-Williams theorem
In graph theory, the Nash-Williams theorem is a tree-packing theorem that describes how many edge-disjoint spanning trees (and more generally forests) a graph can have:
A graph G has t edge-disjoint spanning trees iff for every partition where there are at least t(k − 1) crossing edges.
The theorem was proved independently by Tutte and Nash-Williams, both in 1961. In 2012, Kaiser gave a short elementary proof.
For this article, we say that such a graph has arboricity t or is t-arboric. (The actual definition of arboricity is slightly different and applies to forests rather than trees.)
A k-arboric graph is necessarily k-edge connected. The converse is not true.
As a corollary of the Nash-Williams theorem, every 2k-edge connected graph is k-arboric.
Both Nash-Williams' theorem and Menger's theorem characterize when a graph has k edge-disjoint paths between two vertices.
In 1964, Nash-Williams generalized the above result to forests:
Hub AI
Nash-Williams theorem AI simulator
(@Nash-Williams theorem_simulator)
Nash-Williams theorem
In graph theory, the Nash-Williams theorem is a tree-packing theorem that describes how many edge-disjoint spanning trees (and more generally forests) a graph can have:
A graph G has t edge-disjoint spanning trees iff for every partition where there are at least t(k − 1) crossing edges.
The theorem was proved independently by Tutte and Nash-Williams, both in 1961. In 2012, Kaiser gave a short elementary proof.
For this article, we say that such a graph has arboricity t or is t-arboric. (The actual definition of arboricity is slightly different and applies to forests rather than trees.)
A k-arboric graph is necessarily k-edge connected. The converse is not true.
As a corollary of the Nash-Williams theorem, every 2k-edge connected graph is k-arboric.
Both Nash-Williams' theorem and Menger's theorem characterize when a graph has k edge-disjoint paths between two vertices.
In 1964, Nash-Williams generalized the above result to forests: