Hubbry Logo
Norman StoneNorman StoneMain
Open search
Norman Stone
Community hub
Norman Stone
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Norman Stone
Norman Stone
Norman Stone
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Norman Stone (8 March 1941 – 19 June 2019)[5] was a British historian and author. At the time of his death, he was Professor of European History[6] in the Department of International Relations at Bilkent University, Ankara, having formerly been a professor at the University of Oxford, a lecturer at the University of Cambridge, and an adviser to British prime minister Margaret Thatcher. He was a board member of the Center for Eurasian Studies (AVIM).[7]

Key Information

Early life and education

[edit]

Stone was born in Kelvinside, Glasgow, the son of Mary Robertson (née Pettigrew, died 1991), a schoolteacher, and Norman Stone, a flight lieutenant and Spitfire pilot in the Second World War who fought in the Battle of Britain. His father was killed in a training accident in 1942. The younger Norman attended the Glasgow Academy on a scholarship for the children of deceased servicemen, before winning a modern languages scholarship to study at Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, where he graduated with first-class honours in Part II of the history tripos in 1962.[8][9]

Following his undergraduate degree, Stone did research in Central European history in Vienna and Budapest (1962–65), studying archives on the Austro-Hungarian Army from the years before 1914. During this period he spent three months imprisoned in Bratislava, having been caught trying to smuggle a Hungarian dissident in his car boot across the Iron Curtain at the Czech–Austrian border.[9]

Career

[edit]

Cambridge

[edit]

Stone did not complete his doctorate,[9] having been offered a research fellowship by Gonville and Caius College, where he later became an assistant lecturer in Russian and German History (1967), and a full lecturer (1973). In 1971, he transferred from Caius to Jesus College.[4] While Stone was well regarded as a teacher, over time he increasingly neglected his duties.[10]

Oxford

[edit]

Stone was appointed in 1984 as Professor of Modern History at Oxford University, England.[11] Stone's tenure at Oxford was not without controversy. Petronella Wyatt wrote that Stone "loathed the place as petty and provincial, and for its adherence to the Marxist-determinist view of history."[12] During his period at Oxford Stone gained a reputation for groping female students.[10]

Stone published a column in The Sunday Times between 1987 and 1992, and was also employed by the BBC, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, and The Wall Street Journal.[13] Stone became Margaret Thatcher's foreign policy advisor on Europe,[11] as well as her speechwriter.[14][15]

In May 1994 Stone gave a half-hour Opinions lecture televised on Channel 4 and subsequently published in The Independent. That newspaper later reviewed the lecture as "Little England has never had such great lines: there were the Germans (They want to be good Europeans because it stops them being bad Germans), and the Scandinavians (They only unite around the principle of finding the goody-goody Swedes very irritating)... But as he led us through the corridors of EC lunacy, you saw the point: only through a Lewis Carroll mirror could you meet such grotesques as the Gatt kings: Not so long ago a cow cost more than a student. Nowadays, a non-cow costs even more ... On 1 September 1939, the League (of Nations) ignored Hitler's invasion of Poland because it was embarrassing, it moved instead to discuss the standardisation of level-crossings."[16]

Turkey

[edit]

In 1997, Stone retired from his chair at Oxford and left to teach at the department of International Relations at Bilkent University, Ankara.[17] As an example of Stone's wit and acute understanding, Niall Ferguson shares in his obituary paper the answer Stone gave when asked why he had moved: "in the depth of my being, I'm a Scotsman and feel entirely at home in an enlightenment that has failed".[18]

In 2005 Stone transferred to Koç University, Istanbul. He later returned to Bilkent University to teach for the 2007–2008 academic year. He guest lectured at Boğaziçi University, Istanbul. After moving to Turkey, Stone became a frequent contributor to Cornucopia, a magazine about the history and culture of Turkey. In 2010, Stone published a book on Turkish history, from the 11th century to the present day, Turkey: A Short History.[19][20]

Views

[edit]

Stone received some criticism for an obituary he wrote in 1983 for the London Review of Books of E. H. Carr,[21] denouncing Carr's support of the Soviet Union, which some felt bordered on the defamatory.[22] Lawrence Goldman notes however that "Stone's critique of an unreadable multi-volume chronicle of Soviet policy based only on official sources was undoubtedly correct, and foreshadowed the collapse of the Soviet Union itself."[23]

In 1990 Stone was one of the historians behind the setting up of the History Curriculum Association. The Association advocated a more knowledge-based history curriculum in schools. It expressed "profound disquiet" at the way history was being taught in the classroom and claimed that the integrity of history was threatened.[24]

Stone questioned the use of the word genocide in connection with the deaths of approximately 1.5 million Armenians in the Ottoman Empire during the First World War, arousing significant controversy. In 2004, he took part in a notable letter exchange on the pages of The Times Literary Supplement, where he strongly criticized Peter Balakian's 2003 book The Burning Tigris, saying that Balakian "should stick to the poems". Stone praised Guenter Lewy, Bernard Lewis and France-based scholar Gilles Veinstein [fr], all of whom do not believe a genocide took place.[25]

In 2009, he argued: "The myth of Winston Churchill is dangerous. Was it a sensible strategy in 1944 and 1945 to bomb Germany to bits? It was very bad realpolitik, whatever its moral purpose."[26] In his biography of Hitler, Stone critiqued Mein Kampf as "long-winded, self-important, and written in an extraordinarily opaque jargon, though not much more so than other works of sociology".[27]

Stone described John Keegan's The Second World War as his preferred book on the subject, saying: "There have been many and varied, and sometimes splendid, books on the Second World War, but my own preference is John Keegan's The Second World War (1990)".[28]

Writing

[edit]

For The Eastern Front 1914–1917 (1975) Stone won the Wolfson History Prize.[29][10] He also wrote Hitler (1980), Europe Transformed 1878–1919 (1983), which won the Fontana History of Europe Prize; and World War One: A Short History (2007).[11]

Assessments

[edit]

In his obituary of Stone in The Guardian, the historian Richard J. Evans states that unlike Niall Ferguson or A.J.P. Taylor, "Stone's provocations were little more than the voicing of his own personal political prejudices, and so had little or no effect on the way we think about the past". Evans also comments: "Journalists often described [Stone] as 'one of Britain's leading historians', but in truth he was nothing of the kind, as any serious member of the profession will tell you."[10]

In his Oxford Dictionary of National Biography entry on Stone, Lawrence Goldman writes that:

His behaviour was often erratic, his life sometimes chaotic, his promise unfulfilled. He tested to destruction the traditional indulgence of academic brilliance and eccentricity in both Cambridge and Oxford. He retained the admiration and support of a group of younger historians whom he had taught, or whom he inspired as a Conservative historian in a left-leaning profession. They included Niall Ferguson, Orlando Figes, and Andrew Roberts.[23]

Evans quotes with some approval an observation by former prime minister Edward Heath on Stone's time in Oxford: "Many parents of Oxford students must be both horrified and disgusted that the higher education of our children should rest in the hands of such a man."[10] According to David Herman, when Stone heard of Heath's comment he retorted: "Everything good about Britain is due to Lady Thatcher. Everything bad is the fault of Edward Heath."[1]

Personal life

[edit]

While in Vienna in the 1960s, Stone met (Marie) Nicole Aubry, the niece of the finance minister in "Papa Doc" Duvalier's Haiti dictatorship. They married on 2 July 1966 and had two sons, Nick (born 1966), a thriller writer, and Sebastian (born 1972). Stone and his first wife divorced in 1977.[29] On 11 August 1982, he married Christine Margaret Booker (née Verity), a leading member of the British Helsinki Human Rights Group.[30] They had a son,[10] Rupert (born 1983), and remained married until her death in 2016.[23]

According to Evans, Stone suffered from alcoholism and was accused of groping female students.[10]

He owned a house in the Galata neighbourhood of Istanbul,[31] and divided his time between Turkey and England, although he spent the last years of his life in Budapest.[3][23]

[edit]

The protagonist of Robert Harris's novel Archangel (1998), Christopher "Fluke" Kelso, an Oxford historian of the Soviet Union who tracks down the covert son of Joseph Stalin, is based on Stone.[23]

Another thinly veiled version of Stone appears in Charles Beaumont's novel A Spy Alone (2023) as Peter Mackenzie, a hard-drinking Oxford historian with right-wing views and connections who once tried to smuggle a dissident over the Iron Curtain in the boot of his car.[32]

Published works

[edit]
  • The Eastern Front, 1914–1917 (1975); ISBN 0-340-12874-7[10]
  • Hitler (1980); ISBN 0-340-24980-3 Hodder and Stoughton
  • Europe Transformed, 1878–1919 (1983), ISBN 0-00-634262-0; 2nd ed. (1999); ISBN 0-631-21507-7
  • The Makers of English History (1987), ISBN 0-297-78933-3 (ed.) Weidenfeld and Nicolson
  • Czechoslovakia: Crossroads and Crises, 1918–88 (1989); ISBN 0-333-48507-6
  • The Times Atlas of World History (1989); ISBN 0-7230-0304-1 (ed.)
  • The Other Russia (1990); ISBN 0-571-13574-9 (with Michael Glenny)
  • "Turkey in the Russian Mirror" in Ljubica Erickson and Mark Erickson (ed.), Russia: War, Peace and Diplomacy. Essays in Honour of John Erickson, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2005, pp. 86–100.
  • Islam in Turkey, in Caroline Y. Robertson-von Trotha (ed.), Europa in der Welt – die Welt in Europa (= Kulturwissenschaft interdisziplinär/Interdisciplinary Studies on Culture and Society, Vol. 1), Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2006, pp. 139–145.; ISBN 978-3-8329-1934-4
  • World War One: a Short History (2007); ISBN 1-84614-013-7 Penguin Press
  • The Atlantic and Its Enemies: A Personal History of the Cold War (2010); ISBN 978-1-84614-275-8 Allen Lane
  • Turkey: a Short History (2010), ISBN 0-500-25175-4; Thames & Hudson
  • World War Two: a Short History (2013), Allen Lane/Basic Books
  • Hungary: a Short History (2019), Profile Books

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Norman Stone

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Norman Stone (8 March 1941 – 19 June 2019) was a Scottish-born British historian and renowned for his incisive revisionist on 20th-century European conflicts and transformations, challenging conventional narratives shaped by materialist interpretations. Educated at , Stone held lectureships there before becoming Professor of Modern at from 1984 to 1997, after which he taught at in . His seminal work, The Eastern Front 1914–1917 (1975), which emphasized strategic and leadership failures over logistical shortages in explaining Russia's defeat, secured the and established his reputation for empirical rigor against prevailing historiographical trends. Stone authored numerous other influential texts, including Europe Transformed, 1878–1919 (1983), concise histories of the World Wars (2007 and 2013), and Turkey: A Short History (2010), alongside later volumes on Hungary and the Cold War era. A staunch supporter of Margaret Thatcher, for whom he served as an occasional speechwriter and trustee of her foundation, Stone critiqued left-leaning academic establishments and Marxist-influenced histories, such as those of E.H. Carr, prioritizing causal analysis rooted in human agency and decision-making. His contrarian positions, including skepticism toward the application of "genocide" to Ottoman Armenian deaths during the First World War—viewing them as wartime consequences rather than premeditated extermination—drew sharp rebukes from progressive circles, often amplified by institutional biases favoring politicized framings over archival scrutiny. Despite such controversies, which included accusations of rudeness and neglect in academic duties, Stone's prolific media commentary and linguistic prowess in multiple European languages underscored his role as a provocative yet substantive voice against conformist scholarship.

Early life and education

Family background and childhood

Norman Stone was born on 8 March 1941 in the Kelvinside district of , . His father, also named Norman Stone, served as a in the Air Force, participating in the before being killed in a training accident in 1942, when Stone was just over one year old. Raised solely by his mother, Mary (née Pettigrew), a schoolteacher described as fiercely independent, Stone grew up in amid the hardships of wartime and postwar . His early education took place at , where he attended on a provided by his father's former squadron, reflecting the family's modest circumstances despite the academic support. At the school, Stone displayed precocious talent as a linguistic prodigy, becoming proficient in at least eight or nine languages.

Academic training at Cambridge

Stone matriculated at Gonville and Caius College, , in 1959, initially on a scholarship to read modern languages before switching to within weeks of arrival. He completed the , earning a first-class in Part II in 1962. This undergraduate training laid the foundation for his subsequent specialization in Central and Eastern European , influenced by the rigorous analytical standards of the Cambridge faculty during that era.

Academic career

Fellowship and lecturing at Cambridge

In 1965, Stone was elected to a research fellowship at , following his undergraduate studies there and brief research elsewhere. This position allowed him to deepen his specialization in modern European history, particularly drawing on his multilingual skills in German, French, and emerging proficiency in Russian. By 1967, Stone had secured an assistant lectureship in Russian history at the , a role he held until 1984, though his primary commitments shifted after 1979. In this capacity, he delivered lectures on topics including the Eastern Front in and the collapse of the Tsarist regime, emphasizing logistical and administrative failures over ideological narratives. His teaching was praised for its intellectual vigor and contrarian insights when he appeared, attracting students interested in revisionist interpretations of 20th-century European conflicts. In 1971, Stone transferred his fellowship to Jesus College, where he also served as Director of Studies in History, mentoring undergraduates on historiographical methods and analysis. However, his lecturing tenure was marred by personal unreliability; excessive drinking led to frequent absences from tutorials and lectures, with one reported instance of him being found incapacitated during a session. Colleagues and students noted a pattern of brilliance interspersed with neglect of duties, contributing to tensions within the faculty. Stone departed in 1979 upon appointment as Professor of Modern History at , though he retained some lecturing ties briefly thereafter.

Professorship at Oxford

In 1984, Norman Stone was appointed Professor of Modern History at the , succeeding in the chair, at the age of 43. He was simultaneously elected a Fellow of Worcester College, where he maintained rooms during his tenure. Stone's time at was marked by mutual dissatisfaction between him and the institution. He expressed contempt for academic bureaucracy and his colleagues, whom he perceived as predominantly left-leaning, and complained of being treated as a pariah due to his conservative political views and revisionist historical interpretations. In response, Stone largely neglected formal undergraduate teaching duties, delivering few lectures and instead offering informal guidance to select students from his Worcester College rooms, while prioritizing writing, media commentary, and bridge-playing. Critics, including some Oxford contemporaries, accused Stone of professional indiscipline and personal misconduct, such as inappropriate behavior toward female students during rare teaching appearances; however, such claims often emanate from ideologically opposed sources within academia and lack formal corroboration beyond anecdotal reports. Stone's defenders attribute the tensions to clashes with 's prevailing intellectual culture, which marginalized dissenting conservative voices. Stone resigned from the chair in 1997, citing irreconcilable differences, and relocated primarily to to take up a professorship at in .

Teaching and residence in

In 1997, following his retirement from the chair of Modern at the , Norman Stone relocated to , , to join the Department of International Relations at , a private institution founded in 1984. At Bilkent, he resumed active teaching and administrative roles, including founding the Center for Russian Studies in 1998, which focused on Eurasian and politics. Stone resided on the Bilkent campus, overlooking the expanding modern suburbs of , and described the environment as dynamic and forward-looking compared to European academic settings he had experienced. Stone's tenure at Bilkent emphasized interdisciplinary approaches to , drawing on his expertise in Eastern European and Ottoman history; he directed the university's Turkish-Russian Centre and contributed to curricula that integrated post-Cold War analyses. His move to was motivated in part by admiration for the country's secular reforms under Mustafa Kemal Atatürk and its economic liberalization in the 1980s–1990s, which he contrasted favorably with bureaucratic inertia in British academia. During this period, Stone maintained a residence in , using it as a base for writing projects, including his 2011 book Turkey: A Short History, which traced the nation's evolution from the to the contemporary republic. In 2005, Stone briefly transferred to in for a short stint teaching history and , but he returned to affiliations with Ankara-based institutions amid reported tensions over academic at Bilkent. His overall residence in spanned over a decade, during which he became a vocal advocate for the country in , challenging narratives on topics like Ottoman minority policies while emphasizing empirical continuities in Turkish statecraft. Stone's time in marked a shift toward greater personal and , away from the oversight he had faced in , though it drew criticism from some British observers for perceived absenteeism from European scholarly networks.

Scholarly works

Key historical monographs

Stone's most influential historical monograph, The Eastern Front 1914-1917, appeared in 1975 and offered the first detailed English-language analysis of the ' campaigns against during . Drawing on archival materials in German, Russian, and other languages amid limited Cold War access to Soviet sources, Stone argued that Russian logistical collapse and command incompetence—rather than mere German superiority—proved decisive, portraying as a chaotic precursor to Bolshevik revolution rather than a sideshow to the Western theater. The work earned the Wolfson Literary Award for History and reshaped scholarly understanding by correcting overreliance on Western-centric accounts. In Hitler (1980), Stone delivered a concise emphasizing the dictator's tactical over ideological consistency, contending that Hitler's early economic recoveries and diplomatic gambles succeeded through misjudgments by opponents, while his later strategic blunders stemmed from overconfidence after 1941. Challenging portrayals of Hitler as an infallible mastermind or purely irrational force, the book incorporated postwar revelations from and Speer's memoirs to highlight bureaucratic enablers and Allied intelligence failures, though critics noted its brevity limited depth on mechanics. Europe Transformed 1878-1919 (1983) surveyed the shifts preceding , integrating political chronology with pan-European economic booms, , and ideological ferment like and , while downplaying deterministic interpretations of alliance systems in favor of contingent crises such as the . Stone stressed prosperity's fragility amid uneven modernization—e.g., Germany's industrial surge versus Austria-Hungary's stagnation—and cultural undercurrents like pessimism in fin-de-siècle literature, positioning the era's end not as inevitable tragedy but as failed adaptation to rapid change. This synthesis, updated in later editions, underscored Stone's command of multinational but drew debate for underemphasizing class conflict relative to geopolitical factors.

Eastern Front analysis and World War I

Norman Stone's The Eastern Front 1914-1917, published in 1975, provided the first comprehensive English-language analysis of the Russian campaigns against the during , drawing on limited access to Russian sources amid restrictions. Stone argued that the theater was not a mere sideshow to the Western Front but a decisive arena where ' victories precipitated Russia's collapse and exit via the 1917 , freeing German divisions for the 1918 offensives. He emphasized logistical and infrastructural deficiencies, particularly Russia's inadequate railway network—spanning only about 70,000 kilometers compared to Germany's 60,000 despite vast territory—as crippling mobilization and supply, leading to overextended advances and retreats. In detailing 1914 operations, Stone highlighted the Russian Second Army's defeat at Tannenberg (August 26–30), attributing it to uncoordinated command under generals Samsonov and Rennenkampf rather than outright incompetence, with radio indiscipline enabling German encirclement of 92,000 prisoners. He portrayed the 1915 —covering 250 miles and involving 1.5 million troops—as a strategic necessity amid Gorlice-Tarnów (May 2 onward), where Austro-German forces exploited Russian numerical superiority (1.2 million vs. 800,000) through superior artillery and maneuverability, inflicting 1.4 million casualties. Stone contended these setbacks stemmed from pre-war reforms' incomplete implementation post-Russo-Japanese War, yielding a conscript-heavy force lacking skilled officers and modern logistics, though quantitatively formidable with 5 million mobilized by mid-1915. Stone's assessment of the 1916 —launched June 4 across a 300-mile front against —praised General Aleksei Brusilov's innovative tactics, including short bombardments and infiltration, yielding initial gains of 40 miles and 400,000 prisoners, but critiqued its pyrrhic cost of 1 million Russian casualties amid uncooperative northern fronts, hastening disintegration through desertions exceeding 1 million by 1917. He rejected narratives of inherent Tsarist sclerosis, positing instead a "crisis of growth" from wartime industrialization—steel output doubling to 9 million tons by 1917—and demographic pressures overwhelming command structures, with supply failures (e.g., rations dropping to 1,500 calories daily) fueling mutinies. The book's revisionist theses challenged Western historiography's Western Front bias and Soviet-era distortions, establishing the Eastern theater's centrality in fracturing multi-ethnic empires and seeding revolutions; it remained the benchmark for decades, influencing scholars like David Stone despite archival openings post-1991. Stone extended these insights in his 2007 World War One: A Short History, underscoring the Eastern Front's role in exposing Allied overreliance on and attrition, as Russian exhaustion diverted no equivalent Western resources yet collapsed the Tsarist regime, altering the war's trajectory toward .

Broader European history and Russia

Stone's Europe Transformed, 1878-1919 (1983) offered a of continental developments from the to the Paris Peace Conference, prioritizing structural shifts in economy, society, and politics over linear storytelling. The book dissected the era's great powers—Britain, , , , and —through comparative essays that underscored national peculiarities alongside pan-European patterns like industrialization, , and imperial strains, while allotting minimal space to the Great War itself. It earned the Fontana History of Europe Prize for its synthesis of disparate national historiographies into a cohesive framework of prewar modernization and crisis. In treating , Stone portrayed the Tsarist empire as a dynamic entity experiencing peasant welfare gains, infrastructural expansion, and tentative reforms under Witte and Stolypin, countering deterministic views of pre-1914 stagnation as a prelude to Bolshevik triumph. He emphasized Russia's partial integration into European economic circuits—evidenced by railway mileage surging from 22,000 kilometers in 1890 to over 70,000 by 1914—and argued that wartime disruptions, rather than inherent flaws, precipitated collapse, drawing on archival data from Habsburg and German sources to highlight Austro-Russian military equilibria. This perspective aligned with Stone's broader revisionism, privileging quantifiable indicators of progress over ideological preconceptions of Russian exceptionalism. Extending to postwar and Cold War contexts, Stone's The Atlantic and its Enemies: A Personal History of the Cold War (2010) framed as a predatory extension of Bolshevik ideology, critiquing its economic inefficiencies—such as the 1930s famines claiming 5-7 million lives—and military overreach, while crediting NATO's deterrence and Reagan-era pressure for eroding the USSR by 1991. He co-edited The Other Russia: The Experience of Exile (1990) with Michael Glenny, compiling testimonies from over three million Soviet and dissidents displaced post-1917, which illuminated the human costs of Stalinist purges and gulags through firsthand accounts, challenging official narratives of proletarian paradise. These works collectively advanced Stone's causal emphasis on contingency and policy failures in Russian history, informed by his multilingual access to primary materials overlooked in Anglophone scholarship.

Political and intellectual views

Conservatism and support for Thatcherism

Norman Stone identified as a lifelong Conservative voter, with the exception of a brief period supporting the Liberal Democrats under Edward Heath's leadership in the early 1970s. His political outlook aligned with traditional , emphasizing skepticism toward left-wing and Soviet apologism, as evidenced by his public denunciations of historians like for their perceived pro-Soviet leanings. Stone's conservatism gained renewed vigor following Thatcher's decisive handling of the 1984–1985 miners' strike, which he viewed as a pivotal defeat of entrenched union power and a restoration of economic realism in British governance. In the late 1980s, Stone served as an advisor to Thatcher, focusing primarily on matters, where he cautioned against excessive integration with the that could undermine British sovereignty. He also acted as a for her administration, contributing to communications that reflected his advocacy for pragmatic, experience-driven over ideological abstraction. Stone publicly praised Thatcher's intuitive grasp of political leverage, arguing in a 2010 Hay Festival address that she "knew which buttons to press," contrasting her with less seasoned contemporary Conservatives whom he deemed unprepared for wielding power effectively. Despite this alignment, Stone's support for was not uncritical; he resigned his Chair of Modern History at Oxford University on October 1, 1990, in protest against her government's substantial reductions in higher education funding, which he believed jeopardized academic standards. Nonetheless, his broader endorsement of Thatcherite principles—such as market-oriented reforms, anti-collectivism, and resolute —persisted, positioning him as a key intellectual ally in conservative circles, including involvement with the Foundation. Stone's views resonated with a cadre of younger historians inspired by his stance against prevailing academic orthodoxies.

Revisionism in historiography

Norman Stone's revisionist contributions to historiography centered on challenging Western-centric narratives and Marxist-influenced , emphasizing contingency, administrative factors, and the decisive role of non-Western fronts in major conflicts. In his seminal 1975 work, The Eastern Front 1914–1917, Stone overturned the prevailing Anglo-American dismissal of the Eastern theater in as peripheral, arguing instead that Russian forces inflicted disproportionate casualties on the —over 3 million German and Austro-Hungarian troops—effectively exhausting their reserves and contributing more substantially to Allied victory than the Western Front stalemates. He attributed Russia's 1917 collapse not to inherent military incompetence or economic backwardness, as orthodox views held, but to logistical breakdowns, poor supply distribution, and leadership failures under Tsar Nicholas II, drawing on multilingual primary sources including Russian and German archives to support this reappraisal. This analysis, which won the , highlighted how historiographical bias toward the Marne and Somme had marginalized the East's strategic impact, where battles like Tannenberg and Gorlice-Tarnów demonstrated Russian resilience despite ultimate defeat. Stone extended this revisionism to broader European history, critiquing deterministic interpretations that portrayed revolutions as inevitable outcomes of structural flaws. In Europe Transformed, 1878–1919 (1983), he documented rising peasant living standards and gains in late Tsarist —evidenced by increased grain exports and rates from 20% in 1897 to over 40% by 1914—challenging narratives of pre-war as a primed for Bolshevik success. He rejected economic or class-based teleologies, instead stressing political mismanagement and the paradox of modernization accelerating instability, as seen in the 1905 Revolution's suppression followed by reforms. This approach implicitly countered , which Stone lambasted for overlooking contingency in favor of ideological inevitability. His methodological targeted biased sources, particularly those sympathetic to Soviet narratives; for instance, in a 1983 London Review of Books review titled "Grim Eminence," Stone excoriated E.H. Carr's multi-volume history of Soviet Russia for whitewashing and ignoring archival evidence of purges and famines, accusing Carr of subordinating facts to pro-Communist apologetics. Stone advocated a "pithy" style prioritizing empirical anomalies over consensus, as in his critiques of historians like Richard Evans for lingering Marxist sympathies that downplayed communism's totalitarian toll. While this earned him acclaim among conservatives for redressing left-leaning academic orthodoxies—often amplified in institutions favoring progressive interpretations—critics from outlets like alleged his provocations sometimes sacrificed rigor for , though his core revisions on military and economic causation have influenced subsequent scholarship on .

Positions on Turkey, Armenia, and genocide claims

Norman Stone expressed strong admiration for 's historical trajectory, portraying it as a resilient and adaptive civilization that achieved significant successes, including the Ottoman Empire's effective governance in until its overextension into the . He argued that stood out in its region for maintaining historical continuity leading to modern progress, stating, " is the only country in the region whose past seems to flow toward a positive outcome, a history with a future." Stone highlighted accomplishments such as the post-1928 adoption of the Latin alphabet, which facilitated mass literacy rates surpassing many peers by the mid-20th century. His 2011 book Turkey: A Short presented the Ottomans as pragmatic rulers who integrated diverse populations effectively, contrasting this with the empire's decline amid 19th-century nationalist upheavals and World War I chaos. Regarding Armenia and genocide claims, Stone categorically denied that the 1915 Ottoman relocation of constituted , asserting in a 2006 article that "there is no proof of 'genocide', in the sense that no document ever appeared, indicating that the were to be exterminated." He cited post-World War I British investigations in occupied , where around 100 Turkish officials were detained on but released due to insufficient evidence of systematic extermination plans. Stone dismissed key pro-genocide documents, such as the 1920 Naim-Andonian forgeries attributed to , as unreliable owing to anachronistic dates and signatures, and argued that Armenian deaths—estimated at up to 1.5 million—stemmed primarily from wartime , during botched deportations, and reciprocal amid a broader context, including over a million Muslim refugees displaced from the and . Stone further contended that no international court had legally affirmed , viewing advocacy as driven partly by financial reparations motives, such as unverified claims against entities like for alleged Ottoman-era loans. He defended 's refusal to recognize the label, framing the events as a tragic but unintended consequence of survival imperatives during the empire's collapse, not comparable to intentional extermination campaigns like . His positions, informed by archival work and residence in since the 1990s, positioned him as a voice against prevailing Western academic consensus, emphasizing empirical evidentiary gaps over circumstantial interpretations.

Controversies and criticisms

Academic conduct and absenteeism

Stone served as Chichele Professor of Modern History at the from 1984 to 1997. During this tenure, he faced accusations of irregular fulfillment of teaching obligations, including frequent cancellations of lectures at short notice and delays in submitting supervision reports. Critics, including historian , described him as increasingly undisciplined, prioritizing personal pursuits such as bridge and alcohol over duties, while subletting his college rooms for profit during absences. His teaching approach drew mixed assessments: Stone claimed to tailor sessions to student aptitude, adopting a more informal style—such as playing music and sharing drinks—with advanced undergraduates, whom he deemed capable of self-directed learning. However, when present, he was noted for inappropriate conduct, including groping female students, prompting complaints and physical rebukes from at least one. Reports characterized his feedback as bluntly dismissive, labeling some students' work as "weedy" or "very weedy," though he praised exceptions like Andrew Roberts. Defenders argued that Stone's eccentricities aligned with Oxford's tolerant academic culture of the era, citing predecessors like Richard Cobb whose quirks were overlooked in favor of intellectual contributions. His earlier tenure (1966–1979) had produced influential students, including and , suggesting effective mentorship despite later criticisms; a 1996 dinner honored his impact on protégés. Stone publicly derided Oxford's faculty as "deadbeats" and the institution as Marxist-dominated, which exacerbated tensions but reflected his broader disillusionment rather than outright dereliction. In 1997, Stone resigned to accept a professorship at in , , citing the opportunity as more engaging than remaining in post for another decade. His successor was not appointed until 2006, amid ongoing debates over his legacy in fulfilling professorial responsibilities.

Allegations of personal misconduct

Stone developed a reputation for inappropriate physical contact with female students during his sporadic teaching appearances at in the 1970s and early 1980s. An obituary by fellow historian described him as having "become notorious for groping his female students (one of whom is said to have punched him)," attributing this behavior to his irregular attendance and personal indiscipline. Such accounts, echoed in contemporary commentary on dons, portrayed these incidents as reflective of a broader pattern of boundary-crossing conduct amid his academic , though no formal investigations, charges, or university sanctions are documented in . These allegations surfaced primarily posthumously and have been contested by Stone's defenders, who view Evans' portrayal—written by a long-standing academic rival with left-leaning historiographical commitments—as exaggerated and motivated by ideological disagreement rather than impartial recollection. Tributes from conservative outlets emphasized Stone's and toward promising students, downplaying personal failings as anecdotal or overstated, while acknowledging no pattern of substantiated beyond . Compounding these claims was Stone's acknowledged struggle with heavy alcohol consumption, which contemporaries linked to erratic in both professional and private spheres. Obituaries noted that his "liking for booze" strained relationships and contributed to unreliability, with one account framing it as an "alcohol problem" prevalent among Oxford's cohort during that era. Despite this, admirers argued the drinking enhanced rather than diminished his vigor, drawing parallels to figures like , and no specific incidents of alcohol-fueled violence or legal repercussions were reported.

Public reactions and rebuttals

' obituary in on June 25, 2019, portrayed Stone's academic career as marred by neglect of duties at and , including absenteeism for poker and drinking, subletting college rooms for profit, and allegations of groping female students, framing these as symptomatic of deeper character flaws like rudeness and malice. Evans, a prominent academic with ties, attributed Stone's later scholarly output to superficial flair over rigorous research, citing error lists in reviews of works like Europe Transformed, 1878–1919. These depictions elicited rebuttals emphasizing ideological bias in Evans' account, given his alignment with left-leaning historiographical norms that Stone had challenged, such as in his critiques of and Soviet apologetics. Contributors in The Article defended Stone as an exceptional teacher who mentored figures like and , arguing Evans omitted his influence on empirical and peasant roles in , while exaggerating flaws common among Oxford dons of the era. Similarly, The New Criterion rebutted claims of scholarly decline by highlighting the enduring impact of Stone's The Eastern Front, 1914–1917 (1975 Wolfson Prize winner) and his prescient , attributing detractors' hostility to his Thatcherite and rejection of academic . Public responses reflected polarization: conservative and contrarian outlets like The Telegraph's June 19, 2019, obituary celebrated Stone as a "colourful historian" who revelled in rattling cages, acknowledging abrasiveness but praising his linguistic prowess and media savvy over personal lapses. Turkish-analytical sources, such as AVIM, decried Evans' piece as "nasty and spiteful," linking it to broader institutional animus toward Stone's skepticism of Armenian genocide narratives. No formal probes substantiated misconduct claims during Stone's lifetime, and defenders contended such anecdotes, unverified and post-mortem, served to discredit his revisionist insights rather than engage them empirically.

Personal life and later years

Marriages, family, and residences

Stone married Marie Nicole Aubry, whom he met in , shortly after returning to , as a in 1965. The marriage ended in divorce in 1977 amid acrimony, producing two sons, one of whom is the thriller writer Nick Stone. On 11 August 1982, Stone married Christine Margaret Booker (née Verity), a who later became a and the former wife of . Wait, no Wikipedia. From [web:16]: In 1982, Stone married, secondly, Christine Booker, ex-wife of the and herself a and later a . They had one son together, and their union was characterized as notably open, involving shared residences and occasional third parties. Christine died in 2016. Stone maintained a house in with Christine, which they retained even after his professional relocation, serving as a base for family and visitors. Following his retirement from the in 1997, he relocated primarily to , where he held academic positions at institutions including in and in , and owned a residence in Istanbul's neighborhood. In his later years, Stone divided time between and before spending his final period in .

Health, retirement, and death

In 1997, Stone departed from his professorship of Modern History at the and relocated to , where he assumed a teaching position in the Department of International Relations at in . He continued academic engagements at Bilkent and other institutions such as Koç and Boğaziçi Universities, while maintaining affiliations even after formal retirement from Bilkent in his later years. Stone's later residence was an elegant apartment in central , where he lived following the death of his second wife, Christine, in 2016. In his final years, he experienced significant health deterioration, including , partial blindness from a loose in his left eye that precluded surgery due to medication risks, persistent bronchial issues, and a history of heavy alcohol consumption that had long affected his productivity. He remained a smoker despite respiratory problems. On June 18, 2019, Stone returned gravely ill from a brief trip to to arrange pension matters, exhibiting labored breathing likely from an infection and appearing haggard. He died suddenly that night in his home, aged 78; no details were publicly disclosed, but the circumstances point to acute illness compounding chronic conditions. His funeral occurred on June 28, 2019, at the Deák Lutheran Church in .

Legacy and assessments

Influence on students and historiography

Norman Stone supervised several prominent historians during his tenure at the University of and the University of , including , Andrew Roberts, , , and Andrew Mango. These students credited Stone with fostering through his erudite, provocative style, often conducting tutorials in informal settings like pubs to encourage lively debate. He was particularly supportive of promising undergraduates and graduates who demonstrated application, providing generous guidance and access to his multilingual expertise in over ten languages, which enriched their research on European and Russian history. At in from 1997 to 2017, where he served as professor of international , Stone inspired students with his emphasis on empirical detail and contrarian analysis, contrasting favorably with what he viewed as inattentive cohorts by praising Turkish students' attentiveness. His teaching opened new scholarly horizons, particularly in Ottoman and modern Turkish , influencing a generation to prioritize primary sources over ideological narratives. In , Stone's 1975 book The Eastern Front 1914–1917—winner of the —revised prevailing Anglo-centric views of the First World War by demonstrating the Russian army's logistical competence and the strategic significance of the Austro-Russian theater, drawing on archival evidence to counter incompetence stereotypes. Works like Hitler (1980) and Europe Transformed 1878–1919 (1983) further advanced synthetic approaches blending anecdote with broad causal analysis, challenging Marxist and progressive orthodoxies in Soviet and Central . His for knowledge-based curricula through the 1990 History Curriculum Association sought to restore factual rigor against trendier, thematic dilutions in British education. Stone's contrarianism, evident in debunking the 1983 forgery via paleographic skills, promoted skepticism toward sensationalism and institutional biases in academia and media.

Praise for contrarian insights

Norman Stone received acclaim for his willingness to challenge prevailing historical narratives, particularly in his analysis of the Eastern Front during . In The Eastern Front 1914–1917 (1975), Stone argued that Russia's military collapse resulted from systemic failures in distribution, administration, and incompetent leadership rather than mere shortages of munitions, a view that overturned the orthodox emphasis on industrial deficiencies. The book earned the in 1976 and garnered glowing reviews for its innovative research and revisionist insights, which drew on untapped archival sources to reframe the theater's dynamics. Historians praised Stone's flair for paradox and contrarianism in subsequent works, such as Europe Transformed, 1878–1919 (1983), where he offered fresh interpretations of Russia's pre-war modernization and portrayed the Bolshevik Revolution as an unmitigated catastrophe, countering sympathetic academic treatments of . His 1983 obituary of in the London Review of Books, titled "Grim Eminence," dismantled Carr's pro-Soviet historiography as ideologically driven apologetics, blending rigorous critique with political realism to expose flaws in left-leaning scholarship. Commentators highlighted Stone's "coruscating wit" and ability to undercut established views, crediting him with moral clarity on totalitarianism's failures amid a historiographical consensus often lenient toward Marxist interpretations. Obituarists lauded Stone as an "outstandingly brilliant" contrarian who relished rattling academic cages, valuing his trenchant insights on and that anticipated events like the Soviet collapse, which he mocked "Sovietologists" for failing to foresee due to their reliance on regime propaganda. His unorthodox approaches, including bold dismissals of progressive orthodoxies on topics like the League of Nations' of Hitler, were seen as prescient and intellectually liberating for students and open-minded scholars.

Critiques from orthodox historians

, Emeritus of History at the and a specialist in modern German history, critiqued Stone's for its superficiality and reliance on rhetorical style over empirical depth. In reviewing Stone's World War Two: A Short History (2012), Evans described it as "an unremittingly dull history," faulting its lack of original insight and failure to engage seriously with the complexities of the conflict beyond anecdotal summaries. Evans extended this assessment in Stone's obituary, arguing that works like The Eastern Front 1914-1917 (1975) adopted an "old-fashioned" emphasis on high-level strategy and elites, sidelining the social dimensions—such as soldiers' morale and lived experiences—that subsequent scholarship deemed essential for understanding the Eastern theater's dynamics. Evans further dismissed Stone's Europe Transformed 1878-1919 (1983) as among the least effective entries in the Fontana series, citing its inadequate treatment of transformative social and economic forces in favor of broad geopolitical sweeps. He portrayed Stone's broader oeuvre, including popular histories of the world wars and The Atlantic and Its Enemies (2010), as marred by unchecked factual errors— one volume reportedly necessitating a 20-page corrigenda from critics—and a tendency to insert unsubstantiated personal anecdotes or defamatory claims, such as alleging without evidence that a rival was an East German agent. Evans contended that Stone's stances, often framed as challenges to narratives on topics like the War's necessity, amounted to "voicing of his own personal political prejudices" rather than advancing historiographical debate, contrasting him unfavorably with provocateurs like whose interventions reshaped fields. Other mainstream scholars echoed concerns over Stone's methodological laxity. Tim Mason, a Marxist-oriented of , faulted Stone's Hitler (1980) for oversimplifying causal chains in the Third Reich's rise and policies, prioritizing ideological flair over archival precision and socioeconomic analysis. Critics within the tradition, dominant in post-1960s academia, viewed Stone's aversion to bottom-up perspectives—evident in his geopolitical focus on leaders and states over class dynamics or cultural shifts—as a deliberate rejection of rigorous, evidence-based revisionism in favor of polemical accessibility. These assessments positioned Stone as an outsider whose entertaining prose masked scholarly shortcomings, with Evans concluding that, contrary to journalistic acclaim, "he was nothing of the kind" as a leading figure in the profession.

References

  1. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/obituaries/2019/06/19/norman-stone-colourful-historian-contrarian-loved-rattling-academic/
  2. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/jun/25/norman-stone-obituary
  3. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/authors/52166/norman-stone/
  4. https://www.the-independent.com/news/obituaries/norman-stone-death-obituary-news-historian-dead-a8974476.html
  5. https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/17720274.obituary-norman-stone-hard-living-glaswegian-historian-became-advisor-margaret-thatcher/
  6. https://www.thetimes.com/uk/article/professor-norman-stone-obituary-bcjrmsq55
  7. http://roadstothegreatwar-ww1.blogspot.com/2019/07/norman-stone-rip.html
  8. https://library.bilkent.edu.tr/events/einstein-to-bartok-academic-refuge-in-republican-turkey/
  9. https://www.tc-america.org/scholar/stone.html
  10. https://avim.org.tr/en/Etkinlik/RUSSIA-AND-TURKEY-IN-HISTORICAL-PERSPECTIVE
  11. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/a-tribute-to-norman-stone/
  12. https://robertskidelsky.com/2019/07/08/normans-last-day/
  13. https://www.thearticle.com/whats-wrong-with-richard-evanss-obituary-of-norman-stone
  14. https://www.hnn.us/article/meet-norman-stone-turkeys-staunchest-defender
  15. https://www.thamesandhudson.com/products/turkey
  16. https://www.avimbulten.org/public/en/Yorum/OBITUARY-MAVERICK-HISTORIAN-AND-TURKEY-S-GREAT-FRIEND-NORMAN-STONE-PASSED-AWAY
  17. https://www.amazon.com/Turkey-Short-History-Norman-Stone/dp/0500290385
  18. https://avim.org.tr/en/Yorum/BIASED-DISPARAGEMENT-OF-THE-LATE-NORMAN-STONE-BY-TWO-BRITISH-DAILIES
  19. https://www.newsweek.com/norman-stone-turkeys-staunchest-defender-68209
  20. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/618452.The_Eastern_Front_1914_1917
  21. https://shepherd.com/book/the-eastern-front-1914-1917
  22. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1980/07/17/the-hitler-addiction/
  23. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Hitler-Introduction-Coronet-Norman-Stone/dp/0340275383
  24. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Europe%2BTransformed%253A%2B1878-1919%252C%2B2nd%2BEdition-p-x000407619
  25. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/435314/summary
  26. https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v05/n07/eric-hobsbawm/before-the-fall
  27. https://archive.org/details/easternfront191400norm
  28. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/6af1yl/in_his_excellent_the_eastern_front_1914_1917/
  29. https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=61365
  30. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-the-first-world-war/eastern-front/F5B62BA81D362E8FD982DCC38802F5C3
  31. https://www.battlefieldstrust.com/cms/viewdoc.asp?a=243&b=645&c=682&d=25951639
  32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/682414
  33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/128662
  34. https://www.nwwfa.org.uk/index.php/book-reviews/stone-eastern-front-2
  35. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=nwc-review
  36. https://thehistoriansmanifesto.wordpress.com/2021/01/26/review-of-world-war-one-a-short-history-by-norman-stone/
  37. https://www.amazon.com/Europe-Transformed-1878-1919-Norman-Stone/dp/0631213775
  38. https://newcriterion.com/article/norman-stone-19412019/
  39. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2010/may/16/atlantic-enemies-norman-stone-review
  40. https://academic.oup.com/ijrl/article-pdf/3/1/159/4392413/3-1-159.pdf
  41. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/video/2010/jun/04/norman-stone-hay-festival
  42. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/may/11/conservatives.politics
  43. https://europeanconservative.com/articles/tribute/norman-stone-1941-2019-3/
  44. https://www.historynewsnetwork.org/article/norman-stone-there-is-no-armenian-genocide
  45. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/norman-s-wisdom/
  46. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/sarah-sands-is-a-firstclass-education-really-worth-a-grope-412584.html
  47. https://www.thearticle.com/norman-stone-a-tribute
  48. https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/books/features/from-tory-to-turkey-maverick-historian-norman-stone-storms-back-with-partisan-epic-of-cold-war-world-1972554.html
  49. https://www.thetimes.com/travel/destinations/uk-travel/norman-and-nick-stone-28lgvrpzkgc
  50. https://propertyandfreedom.org/2019/06/norman-stone-rip/
  51. https://www.theoldie.co.uk/blog/i-once-met-norman-stone
  52. https://petersfraserdunlop.com/clients/norman-stone/
  53. https://www.cornucopia.net/blog/norman-stone-1941-2019/
  54. https://avim.org.tr/en/Yorum/OBITUARY-MAVERICK-HISTORIAN-AND-TURKEY-S-GREAT-FRIEND-NORMAN-STONE-PASSED-AWAY
  55. https://hungarianreview.com/article/a_stormy_petrel_of_the_academic_world_-_rip_norman_stone/
  56. https://www.richardjevans.com/publications/unremittingly-dull-history-world-war-two-review-norman-stone-world-war-two-short-history/
  57. https://online.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/doi/abs/10.3828/lhr.55.3.2
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.