Hubbry Logo
Tel AradTel AradMain
Open search
Tel Arad
Community hub
Tel Arad
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Tel Arad
Tel Arad
Tel Arad
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Tel Arad (Hebrew: תל ערד) or Tell 'Arad (Arabic: تل عراد, romanized: Tall ʿArād) is an archaeological site consisting of a lower section and a tell or mound. It is located west of the Dead Sea, about 10 kilometres (6 miles) west of the Israeli city of Arad in an area surrounded by mountain ridges which is known as the Arad Plain. The site is about 10.1 ha (25 acres) in size.

Key Information

The site comprises two parts: a Canaanite settlement on lower ground and a Judahite fortress and settlement on a hill. The Canaanite settlement was inhabited from the early 4th to the mid 3rd millennium BCE, while the Judahite habitation was established in the 10th century BCE and continued until 135 CE during the Bar Kokhba revolt. After a period of abandonment, the settlement was reinhabited in the 7th century CE during the Early Muslim period and was used for approximately two centuries.

The lower and upper sites are part of the Tel Arad National Park, which has undertaken projects to restore the upper and lower sites and opened them to the public. Tel Arad has been excavated in the 20th and 21st centuries.

Proposed identification

[edit]

It was first identified in modern literature in 1841 by Edward Robinson in his Biblical Researches in Palestine, on account of the similarity of the Arabic place name, Tell 'Arad, with the Arad in the Book of Joshua.[1][2]

Yoel Elitzur observes that although the site remained uninhabited for the last 1,100 years, the name has endured, preserved by nomads.[3]

Not the site of Canaanite Arad

[edit]

The lack of Middle and Late Bronze Age remains seems to invalidate the identification with biblical, i.e. Canaanite Arad.[4] On the other hand, the two Hebrew ostraca containing the name Arad confirm the site as being the Iron Age, i.e. Israelite Arad.[4] One theory trying to solve the problem suggests that "the Negev of Arad" was only the name of the surrounding region at the time, with no city in existence.[4] A second theory places Canaanite Arad at Tel Malhata [fr], 8 mi (13 km) southwest of Tel Arad, where archaeologists found substantial Middle Bronze Age fortifications.[4] An argument in favour of the latter theory is Pharaoh Sheshonk's list of captured cities, with one "Arad the House of YRHM", possibly at Tel Arad and referring to the settling there of Jerahmeelite families, and another "Great Arad" (possibly Tel Malhata) towering over the "Negev of Arad".[4]

Location: geography, roads, water

[edit]

Tel Arad is positioned on the northern edge of the southern Israeli Beersheba–Arad Valley,[5] defined by scholars as "the eastern (biblical) Negev", the Hebrew Bible using the term Negev only for the northern part of the region known today by that name.[6]

This east-west oriented valley was a convenient route for caravans during periods of sustained commercial activity.[7]

The water supply was first ensured by a system of harvesting rainwater and its runoff built during the Early Bronze Age, and later by a well; archaeologists disagree on whether the well was already dug by the Early Bronze Age settlers or only during the Iron Age.[8]

History

[edit]

Chalcolithic: open settlement

[edit]

Stratum V: The site is divided into a lower section and an upper section on a hill. In the Late Chalcolithic (c. 4000 BCE), the lower section was settled for the first time.[9][10] It was an open settlement, i.e., lacking fortifications.[4]

Early Bronze Age: Canaanite city

[edit]

For the subdivisions of the Bronze Age, see here, and for an overview for this region here.

In the Early Bronze Age (EBA), Tel Arad (Strata IV-I) was occupied in the EBA I–II and took part in the Beersheba Valley copper trade. In general Tel Arad lies in a drier region where frequencies of human activity depended upon oscillations toward wetter climate conditions.

Early Bronze IB

[edit]

The Early Bronze IB (EB IB, c. 3300/3200–3050/3000 BCE) saw the Stratum IV city flourishing. There was an amount of Egyptian pottery found indicating trade.

Climate. The Southern Levant during the EB IB was dominated by very humid climate conditions.[11] In the northern part of the Southern Levant there were higher levels of arboreal Mediterranean tree pollen and olive pollen. This was a proto-urban period where settlements spread and population grew, also spreading human activity into the Negev region.[12][page needed]

Early Bronze II

[edit]
Ceramic model of a house of the broadroom "Arad house" type, Tel Arad, c. 3,000–2,650 BCE. Israel Museum, Jerusalem.

In Early Bronze II (c. 3050/3000–2750/2700 BCE) Arad was a large fortified city,[4] with rich remains contained in Stratum III (EB IIA) and II (EB IIB).[13][14]

  • Stratum III (EB IIA) was an urban town with city wall, palace, sacred precinct, public buildings, and reservoir. It was destroyed around 2800 BCE.
  • Stratum II (EB IIB) saw Tel Arad quickly rebuilt. The material culture was the same as Stratum III.

Early Bronze III

[edit]

The Early Bronze III (c. 2750–2350 BCE) saw Arad abandoned. This may have been associated with the rise of central trading sites in the Negev Highlands related to the copper industry in the Arabah and trade towards Egypt in the Old Kingdom.[15]

  • Stratum I: a sparse settlement in the ruins of the city of Stratum II. Abandoned by around 2650 BCE.

Iron Age

[edit]

Herzog's 2002 interim report adopts the now better accepted "low chronology", lowering by a century most of the dates previously proposed for the Iron Age by adherents of the "biblical archaeology" approach:[16] this is also the base chosen here for this section.

With the Late Bronze Age collapse, the fall of the Egyptian New Kingdom during the 20th Dynasty saw its control over polities in the Southern Levant decline.

After a 1,500-years-long period of abandonement, the northeastern hill, the highest elevation on the margin of the destroyed Bronze Age city, was settled again during the 10th-9th centuries BCE (Iron Age IIA).[17] The village there made use of broadroom Bronze Age house remains, while also building new dwellings.[17]

In the 9th century BCE, after the apparent evacuation of the villagers, a fortress was built on the mound.[17] It went through a cycle of destruction and - as it seems - immediate reconstruction totalling six phases over a timeframe of 260 years, until the early 6th century BCE,[5][17] until the time when Judah was crushed by the Babylonians.

Aharoni, thoroughly updated by Herzog, distinguished 13 occupation strata on the "fortress mound":[5][17]

  • Stratum XIII (mid-3rd millennium BCE):[5] poorly preserved Early Bronze Age city remains[17]
  • Stratum XII (Iron Age IIA-IIB, 10th-9th centuries BCE):[17] probably a site used by pastoral nomads, turning into a small village of the permanent "enclosed settlement" type[18]
  • Strata XI-VI (Iron Age IIB-IIC, 9th-6th centuries BCE), during the Kingdom of Judah): a fortress going through six (re)construction phases[5][17]
  • Strata V–III: forts from the Persian, Hellenistic and Roman periods, preserving the military purpose of the site[19][5]

The ancient settlement period was again interrupted, with two more strata to follow much later:

Iron Age II village

[edit]

The site was resettled in the second half of the 10th - first half of 9th century BCE by a small number of people, c. 80-100, the Stratum XII village eventually taking the shape of an oval "enclosed settlement" with 20 to 25 dwellings set wall to wall around a courtyard probably serving as a sheep pen.[20] The enclosure only had one exit on the east, toward the depression in the earlier "Lower City" which again served for collecting water.[20] Herzog, writing in 2002, categorically distances himself from earlier interpretations which were motivated by a literal acceptance of the biblical narrative down to its details, typical for the "biblical archaeology" approach practiced until the 1980s, and refutes with thorough arguments the existence of any ritual site at this early date.[20][21]

Iron Age II Judahite fortress; temple, ostraca

[edit]
Stratum X gate of Arad Fortress

Tel Arad became a fortified stronghold of the Kingdom of Judah.

  • Stratum XI: A Judahite casemate fortress is built (2nd half of 9th century BCE), the first in a series of six.[22]
  • Stratum X: The fortress sees improvements with solid walls and a towering gate (mid-8th century BCE).[22]
  • Stratum IX: 2nd half of 8th century BCE.[22]
  • Stratum VIII (2nd half of 8th c.): A short-lived stratum ending with the destruction caused by Sennacherib in 701 BCE.[22]
  • Stratum VII: At the end of the 7th century BCE, Edomites might have destroyed the fortress.[22]
  • Stratum VI (late 7th - early 6th c. BCE): The last Judahite fortress destroyed by the Babylonians in 586 BCE.[22]
Ostraca
Main article: Arad ostraca

Between 1962 and 1964, some 200 ostraca (inscribed pottery sherds) were excavated.[22][23] 107 of them are in ancient Hebrew, written using the Paleo-Hebrew alphabet and dated to circa 600 BCE (Stratum VI). Of the ostraca dated to later periods, the bulk are written in Aramaic and a few in Greek and Arabic.[24] Most of the Hebrew ostraca consist of everyday military correspondence between the commanders of the fort and are addressed to Eliashib, thought to be the fort's quartermaster.[25] One ostracon mentions a "house of YHWH", which some scholars believe is a reference to the Jerusalem temple.[26] With them was found a partial ostracon inscribed in hieratic Egyptian script, similarly dated. The supplies listed included south-Egyptian barley and animal fats (vs the wheat and olive oil in the Hebrew ostraca).[27] In 1967 an ostracon was found with text written in a combination of intermingled hieratic and Hebrew-Phoenician signary, without being a bilingual text .[28]

Temple
Holy of holies of temple, with two incense pillars and two stele, one dedicated to Yahweh, and one most likely to Asherah

The Tel Arad temple was uncovered by archaeologist Yohanan Aharoni during the first excavation season in 1962. He spent the rest of his life investigating it, and died prematurely in 1976 before publishing the excavation results.

In the holy of holies of this temple two incense altars and two possible stele or massebot or standing stones were found.[29]

Unidentified dark material preserved on the upper surface of the two altars was submitted for organic residue analysis, with several cannabis derivates being detected on the smaller altar: THC, CBD, and CBN. The residue on the large altar contained many chemicals associated with frankincense. While the use of frankincense for cultic purposes is well-known, the presence of cannabis was novel, if not shocking. It represents the "first known evidence of hallucinogenic substance found in the Kingdom of Judah."[29] It has also been noted that hemp cloth is extremely rare in the Iron Age Levant, the only occurrence in an archaeological context being a piece of very fine hemp textile found on a loom at a site further up north in the Jordan Valley, in a probably cultic complex containing the Deir Alla inscription, where it is thought to have been woven for the goddess Shagar. The complex most likely dates to the 2nd half of the 9th century BCE, being destroyed by an earthquake around 800 BCE.[30][31]

Persian period

[edit]

Stratum V: The settlement belonging to the Persian period.

Hellenistic and Roman periods: citadels

[edit]

Stratum IV (Hellenistic): It is believed that several citadels were built one upon the other and existed in the Hellenistic and Roman periods.

Herod even reconstructed the lower city for the purpose of making bread.[dubious – discuss] The site lasted until the end of the Bar Kokhba revolt 135 CE.

Muslim conquest to Abbasid period

[edit]

Tel Arad lay in ruins for 500 years until the Early Muslim period, when the former Roman citadel was rebuilt and remodeled by some prosperous clan in the area and functioned for 200 years until around 861, when there was a breakdown of central authority and a period of widespread rebellion and unrest. The citadel was destroyed and no more structures were built on the site.

Excavations

[edit]
Tell Arad in the PEF Survey of Western Palestine, 1880

Tel Arad was excavated during 18 seasons, first between 1962 and 1967, with further excavations lasting until 1984, the lower area by Ruth Amiran and the mound by Yohanan Aharoni.[32][33] Due to Y. Aharoni's premature death, the final report for that excavation was still in progress as of 2022.[5] An additional 8 seasons were done on the Iron Age water system.[34]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Tel Arad

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Tel Arad is an archaeological tell located in the northern desert of southern , west of the Dead Sea and approximately 30 kilometers northeast of , comprising a lower settlement with Early Canaanite urban remains and an upper mound featuring an Judahite fortress.
The site was primarily excavated by Yohanan Aharoni between 1962 and 1967, revealing continuous occupation from the period through the Persian era, with the upper citadel's strata documenting Judahite military and administrative presence from the 10th to 6th centuries BCE, including a small temple structure akin to the Temple and over 80 Hebrew ostraca inscribed with administrative texts, names, and possible biblical references.
Notable for providing the only archaeologically verified Israelite temple outside —likely dismantled during the religious centralization reforms attributed to Kings or —the site's finds offer empirical evidence of Judahite frontier fortifications and cultic practices, though its equation with the biblical Canaanite Arad of Numbers 21:1 is contested owing to sparse Late remains, suggesting the biblical locale may refer to a distinct nearby settlement.

Geography and Strategic Location

Physical Description and Environment

Tel Arad occupies a double-mounded tel in the northern Desert, comprising a lower settlement area and an elevated upper situated on a ridge of soft . The site spans approximately 40 hectares and rises amid scrub-covered hills with sparse natural , providing a naturally defensible elevated position due to its . The regional is arid semi-desert, with average annual ranging from 80 to 100 mm, concentrated in winter months from to , which constrains by limiting reliable to seasonal flows in nearby wadis. Summer temperatures often exceed 30°C, while winters average around 12°C, exacerbating the challenges of in an environment dominated by exceeding . Proximity to ephemeral wadis offers periodic for and potential collection, while the underlying formation not only supplies construction but also influences local through features, though overall necessitates adaptive strategies for sustained occupation.

Historical Trade Routes and Water Resources

Tel Arad's elevated position in the northern placed it at a key nexus of ancient north-south caravan routes linking the copper-rich valley, including the Timna mines roughly 90 kilometers to the southeast, with the settled regions of Judah and beyond. These paths, suited for and traversing the semi-arid terrain, enabled the northward flow of metals and other southern commodities, contributing to the site's strategic and economic importance across multiple periods. Archaeological assessments highlight how the surrounding ridges and valleys funneled traffic, making Arad a natural checkpoint for monitoring and taxing trade precursors to later networks like the Route. The site's repeated occupation correlates directly with its water management capabilities, vital in a region with sparse and erratic precipitation. Excavations revealed an water system beneath the citadel, featuring rock-cut cisterns connected by underground channels to collect and store rainwater runoff from the mound's surface. These installations, including a deep well-shaft, allowed sustained habitation by garrisons and settlers despite the aridity, with capacities estimated to support populations for extended dry seasons or sieges. Earlier evidence points to similar cistern-based strategies, underscoring how effective hydrological , rather than reliable springs, underpinned resilience and resettlement. The interplay of route control and water security thus formed a causal foundation for Arad's utility as a fortified outpost, independent of specific cultural overlays.

Identification Debates

Relation to Biblical Accounts

The first references Arad in Numbers 21:1-3, recounting how the Canaanite king of Arad, dwelling in the , learned of the ' approach via the road to Atharim during their wilderness journey, prompting him to attack and capture prisoners. In response, the Israelites vowed total destruction of the Canaanites and their cities if victorious; following divine deliverance, they fulfilled this by utterly destroying the settlements and naming the site Ḥormah (meaning "devotion to destruction"). This episode portrays Arad as an early aggressor against the wandering Israelites, marking a pivotal skirmish near the end of the forty-year exodus period. Joshua 12:14 lists the king of Arad among thirty-one rulers defeated by the under 's leadership west of the , integrating the Numbers account into the broader conquest narrative and affirming Arad's status as a Canaanite royal city overcome during the settlement of . The verse pairs Arad with Hormah, reinforcing the linkage between the wilderness victory and later campaigns, as both are enumerated consecutively in the tally of subjugated monarchs. Biblical texts further connect Arad to Judah's early tribal allotments and border dynamics in the Iron Age framework of monarchic Judah, situating it in the southern as a frontier outpost amid threats from Edomites and nomadic groups. Narratives in :16-17 depict Judahite and Simeonite forces allying to capture and raze Zephath (equated with Hormah), with Kenite kin of settling nearby "in the wilderness of Judah, which is in the near Arad," implying strategic consolidation of the region for territorial control. This positions Arad within Judah's southern perimeter in scriptural geography, essential for safeguarding trade routes and defending against incursions in the post-conquest era.

Arguments Against Equation with Canaanite Arad

Excavations at Tel Arad have revealed a substantial Early urban center, flourishing from approximately 3150 to 2650 BCE with fortified walls, temples, and multi-room houses indicative of a possibly exceeding 2,000, but this settlement was abandoned following widespread destruction layers dated to around 2700 BCE, with no significant reoccupation during the Middle or Late . This chronological gap undermines the equation of Tel Arad with the Canaanite Arad referenced in biblical accounts of the Israelite , such as Numbers 21:1, where the "king of Arad, who lived in the ," mounts an attack on circa 1400–1200 BCE, implying an active Late capable of military engagement. Scholars argue that the absence of Late , structures, or settlement debris—despite extensive trenching across the lower and upper mounds—indicates no existed there during the period when biblical Arad would have operated as a . Yohanan Aharoni's initial proposal in the 1950s and 1960s to identify Tel Arad as biblical Arad, based on its strategic position and ancient name preservation, faced revisionary critiques from subsequent excavators and analysts due to these stratigraphic discrepancies. The site's remains do not reflect the scale or continuity expected of a Canaanite stronghold listed among 's conquest targets (Joshua 12:14), as surveys in the surrounding Beersheba-Arad Valley similarly yield scant Late Bronze evidence, suggesting any Arad-related activity was nomadic or ephemeral rather than urban. Later teams, including those under Ruth Amiran and Ze'ev Herzog, confirmed the occupational hiatus, prompting proposals for alternative identifications, such as Horvat Uza—a nearby fortress 10 km south with subsidiary structures but no confirmed Late Bronze urban footprint—to better align with textual topography, though Horvat Uza itself lacks the Early Bronze magnitude of Tel Arad. Topographical considerations further challenge the identification, as Tel Arad's elevation of 523 meters above and inland position, approximately 25 kilometers west of the Dead Sea rift and distant from the "way of the Atharim" or Scorpion Ascent (Numbers 34:4; Judges 1:16), do not match descriptions of Arad as positioned to intercept southern approach routes from the wilderness. Biblical itineraries place Arad near the Negev's southern border ascents, whereas Tel Arad's location favors oversight of inland valleys rather than direct ambush points on trans-Jordanian paths, leading some researchers to favor sites like Tel Malhata or regional nomadic centers for the Canaanite entity. These empirical mismatches, derived from surface surveys and core samplings showing erosion but no buried Late Bronze layers, prioritize archaeological data over onomastic continuity in evaluating site equivalence.

Empirical Evidence from Surveys and Texts

Excavations at Tel Arad yielded over 200 ostraca dating to circa 600 BCE, consisting primarily of Hebrew correspondence among Judahite officials, including orders for wine, bread, and troop movements addressed to a figure named Eliashib, likely a fortress . Among these, at least two ostraca explicitly bear the name "Arad," directly linking the site to the toponym referenced in biblical accounts of Judahite administration. Handwriting analysis of the corpus indicates composition by at least 12 distinct authors, evidencing widespread in the Judahite bureaucracy consistent with a frontier outpost under centralized royal control. This epigraphic material aligns the site's phase with descriptions of Arad as a Judahite stronghold in texts like 2 Chronicles 28:16, where it served logistical roles amid regional threats. Surface surveys and pottery scatters at Tel Arad predominantly feature Judahite ceramics, such as collared-rim jars and cooking pots, alongside visible casemate walls and towers indicative of a fortified rather than an expansive urban center. These findings emphasize defensive architecture suited to border security, with no surface traces of monumental structures like large-scale walls or palaces that would typify a major Canaanite polity. While excavations beneath the layers reveal Early Bronze II occupation (circa 3000–2700 BCE) involving copper trade networks and domestic units, confines Stratum II to a brief 20-year span ending in abrupt destruction around the early third millennium BCE, predating Late Bronze contexts by over a millennium. The absence of Late Bronze continuity—evidenced by barren strata between Early Bronze collapse and Iron Age reoccupation—challenges equating Tel Arad with the Canaanite Arad of Numbers 21 and Joshua 12, purportedly conquered during Israelite entry into Canaan circa 1400–1200 BCE. Instead, the site's elevated position and cistern systems enhance its defensibility as a Judahite sentinel against Edomite incursions, mirroring causal dynamics in 2 Kings 8:20–22 where southern frontier vulnerabilities prompted revolts and fortifications. This configuration prioritizes strategic oversight of trade routes over agricultural self-sufficiency, congruent with empirical patterns of Iron Age Judahite expansion into the Negev amid Edomite pressure.

Prehistoric and Bronze Age Occupation

Chalcolithic Settlement Patterns

The lower settlement area at Tel Arad was occupied during the late period, circa 4000–3400 BCE, manifesting as an unfortified, dispersed open-air village rather than a nucleated town. Excavations by Ruth Amiran revealed structural remains indicative of semi-permanent habitation, predating the fortified urban phases of the Early . This phase aligns with the broader Ghassulian cultural horizon in the southern Levant, marked by the transition from traditions to increased and technological innovation. Artifactual evidence includes distinctive Ghassulian-style , such as churns, V-shaped bowls, and possibly cornets, alongside an assemblage of flint tools comprising blades for harvesting, scrapers, and burins suited to processing local resources. These materials reflect subsistence strategies involving dry farming in the arid environment and exploitation of nearby systems for water and grazing. Traces of early artifacts or processing waste suggest limited engagement with nascent , likely through exchange with production centers in the or Faynan rather than on-site smelting. The settlement appears to have been abandoned by approximately 3800 BCE, coinciding with the widespread decline of Ghassulian sites across the southern Levant, possibly linked to climatic or shifts in resource availability that disrupted pastoral-agricultural balances. This hiatus lasted until the Early Bronze I reoccupation, during which more organized urban forms emerged, indicating a rupture in continuity rather than gradual evolution. No evidence of dense social hierarchies or monumental architecture is present, underscoring the pre-urban character of this phase based solely on stratigraphic and typological data.

Early Bronze Age Urban Development

The Early I-II phases at Tel Arad (c. 3500–2700 BCE) marked the transition from proto-urban settlement to a fortified urban center, characterized by the construction of a massive city wall enclosing approximately 100 dunams, defensive towers, and public buildings indicative of centralized planning. Excavations directed by Ruth Amiran uncovered broadroom houses and storage facilities in these strata (primarily Strata IV-III), alongside ceramics including imports from the northern , suggesting participation in regional trade networks, particularly copper from the Beersheba Valley. supports a high chronology for this development, with the EB I-II transition occurring variably between 3200–2900 BCE across southern Levantine sites, aligning Arad's growth with broader urbanization trends driven by resource exploitation and agricultural surplus. By Early III (c. 2700–2200 BCE, Strata II-I), Tel Arad reached its urban peak, featuring multi-room courtyard houses, elite residences with plastered floors, and cultic installations including altars and standing stones, reflecting and practices. The appearance of Khirbet Kerak ware , originating from northern sites like Bet Yerah, points to cultural influences or migrations prior to the period's end, though local continuity dominated the . Stratigraphic evidence from Amiran’s campaigns reveals dense residential quarters and administrative structures, underscoring Arad's role as a key nodal point in the Negev's semi-arid economy. The urban phase collapsed abruptly around 2200 BCE, coinciding with a regional Early crisis evidenced by widespread burn layers, structural collapses, and subsequent erosion across the tell, leading to prolonged abandonment. This destruction horizon at Arad, lacking clear evidence of foreign invasion, aligns with climatic deterioration and systemic failures in southern Levantine , as corroborated by radiocarbon models indicating the EB III-IV transition near 2500–2200 BCE. Post-collapse strata show no immediate reoccupation, with the site's prominence shifting to nomadic or adaptations in the subsequent EB IV period.

Collapse and Abandonment in Late Bronze Age

Archaeological investigations at Tel Arad reveal scant from the Late Bronze Age (c. 1550–1200 BCE), consisting primarily of isolated pits, sherds, and ephemeral structures that point to intermittent squatter activity rather than organized urban occupation. This sparse evidence contrasts with more substantial Canaanite settlements in core regions, underscoring the site's marginal status in the arid , where sustained habitation was challenging without robust water management. Erosion and low artifact density further suggest that any prior layers were minimal and quickly overwritten or dispersed, leaving no trace of fortifications or public buildings typical of Late Bronze polity centers. Regional factors contributing to this diminished presence include fluctuating Egyptian administrative oversight, which prioritized coastal and highland enclaves over desert peripheries, alongside environmental stressors. Pollen analyses from sediments indicate a shift toward drier conditions by the late 13th century BCE, marked by reduced arboreal coverage and cereal cultivation proxies, aligning with broader Levantine aridification that strained subsistence in semi-arid zones like the Arad vicinity. Settlement pattern surveys across the southern Levant corroborate a contraction of Late Bronze sites, with many outposts showing abandonment signatures tied to resource scarcity rather than solely military disruption. By circa 1200 BCE, the squatter phase at Tel Arad effectively ceased, coinciding with the terminal Late Bronze collapse and transitional hiatus before I reoccupation around the 12th–11th centuries BCE. This gap reflects systemic vulnerabilities in peripheral settlements, where proxy data from paleoclimate records—such as diminished olive and pine —underscore drought's role in depopulation over speculative invasion narratives unsupported by local . The absence of destruction layers at the site further differentiates Arad's trajectory from coastal sites, emphasizing ecological limits in the Negev's settlement continuum.

Iron Age Judahite Presence

Village and Early Fortifications

Following the , Tel Arad experienced reoccupation in the early II period, around 1000 BCE, marked by Stratum XI, an unwalled village phase characterized by simple, scattered domestic structures on the mound. These remains indicate modest settlement resumption, likely by pastoral-agricultural groups exploiting the Negev's marginal resources. By X in the late BCE, the site evolved into a cluster of farmsteads emphasizing , with of basic water collection systems to support cultivation in the arid environment. from these layers prominently featured Judahite types, including collar-rim storage jars typical of II Judahite , used for and liquid commodities, confirming affiliation with the Kingdom of Judah rather than local nomadic or Edomite groups. Agricultural activities included cultivation, inferred from storage installations and tools suited to , contributing to a potentially oriented toward regional demands under Judahite administration. This unwalled configuration persisted amid sparse population but shifted toward defense by the BCE in IX, with the erection of an enclosing wall responding to heightened threats from desert nomads and expansionist neighbors like .

Fortress Construction and Temple Complex

The Judahite fortress at Tel Arad, situated on the , was constructed primarily during the 9th to 8th centuries BCE as a defense installation in the Kingdom of Judah. It featured walls approximately 4 meters thick, designed for structural integrity and defensive purposes, enclosing an area of about 50 by 50 meters. The eastern gate was fortified with two flanking towers, providing controlled access and aligning with typical Judahite military architecture. An administrative palace complex occupied the western sector, including a central hall, living quarters, courtyards, and storerooms, indicative of centralized governance and logistical support for regional operations. These elements suggest construction under kings such as Joash (r. 835–796 BCE) or contemporaries, emphasizing strategic control over southern trade routes and frontiers. Adjacent to the palace, the temple complex formed a key cultic feature within the fortress, active from the BCE until its dismantling around 715 BCE. The structure comprised an outer courtyard with a large square measuring roughly 5 cubits per side, leading to an , a main hall, and an inner . Inside the , excavators uncovered two altars bearing traces of offerings and two standing stones (massebot), alongside niches potentially for additional cultic items, but no evidence of figurative idols. This tripartite layout parallels the biblical described in Exodus, with sequential zones of increasing sanctity and ritual furnishings focused on aniconic worship. The temple's integration into the fortress underscores its role in state-sponsored religion, supporting military and administrative functions at this remote outpost.

Ostraca Inscriptions and Administrative Role

More than one hundred Hebrew ostraca, inscribed primarily in Paleo-Hebrew script with ink on pottery sherds, were recovered from the Judahite fortress at Tel Arad, offering direct evidence of a literate administrative bureaucracy in the late . These artifacts, dating to approximately 600 BCE during the final decades before the Babylonian destruction of 586 BCE, predominantly originate from the associated with Eliashib, identified as the local quartermaster or commander responsible for provisioning remote outposts. The inscriptions encompass ration lists detailing distributions of staples such as wine, , , and silver, alongside letters coordinating , including troop reinforcements and supplies for foreign mercenaries referred to as . Examples include directives to Eliashib, such as orders to allocate three baths of wine to the and notations of daily receipts, reflecting a hierarchical system of from central Judahite authorities to frontier garrisons. Specific ostraca mention the "house of YHWH" and the "King of Judah," underscoring ties to royal and possibly cultic administration amid regional threats like Edomite incursions. Handwriting analysis of sixteen key ostraca via image processing and techniques has identified at least six distinct authors, indicating that extended beyond elite scribes to multiple mid-level , such as quartermasters and officers. This diversity suggests an established educational framework supporting bureaucratic operations, with implications for the production and of administrative across Judah's southern border defenses circa 700–600 BCE. The corpus demonstrates efficient resource allocation in a fortified network, highlighting Arad's role as a logistical hub rather than merely a defensive post.

Destruction Layers and Regional Conflicts

Excavations at the Tel Arad fortress uncovered multiple destruction layers in the strata, characterized by extensive burning and structural collapse, linking the site to broader regional conflicts involving Assyrian and Babylonian incursions into Judah. Stratum VIII, dated to the late 8th century BCE, ended in a destruction layer attributed to the Assyrian campaign of in 701 BCE, based on stratigraphic sequence and pottery typology consistent with late assemblages disrupted at that time across Judahite sites. Although direct military artifacts such as Assyrian-style arrowheads are not prominently reported at Arad, the burn evidence aligns with the widespread devastation documented at fortified settlements during 's Judah expedition, which targeted rebellious provinces as recorded in Assyrian annals. Subsequent rebuilding in Stratum VII occurred amid ongoing Judahite administration, but this phase terminated around 597 BCE in another fiery destruction, correlated with Nebuchadnezzar II's initial Babylonian campaign against Jerusalem, which resulted in the deportation of King Jehoiachin. Archaeological indicators include charred building remains and pottery sherds from the late 7th to early 6th century BCE, alongside arrowheads typologically identical to those from confirmed Babylonian military contexts, such as camps at Carchemish. The final Judahite occupation in Stratum VI concluded circa 586 BCE with comprehensive destruction by fire, coinciding with the Babylonian sack of and the end of the Kingdom of Judah. This layer exhibits uniform burning across fortifications, administrative structures, and the temple complex, paralleling destruction horizons at other Judahite border forts like Tel Beersheba and Ramat Rahel, and is followed by prolonged abandonment. The sequence underscores Arad's role as a vulnerable southern outpost in Judah's defenses against imperial expansions from .

Post-Iron Age Phases

Persian and Hellenistic Settlements

Following the Babylonian destruction of the Judahite fortress in the early BCE, Tel Arad saw limited reoccupation during the Achaemenid Persian period (c. 539–332 BCE), characterized by sparse settlement rather than large-scale reconstruction. Archaeological strata (V–IV) indicate a minor military outpost with simple domestic structures and small-scale agricultural features, reflecting continuity of the site's strategic role in the Valley without evidence of monumental building. This phase aligns with broader patterns in Yehud province, where administrative control was maintained through modest installations amid reduced population density. In the subsequent Hellenistic period (c. 332–63 BCE), occupation remained intermittent and low-intensity, focused on pastoral and agricultural use within the repaired fortress framework. IV yields attest to reuse of earlier fortifications for defensive purposes, with assemblages showing regional continuity but no signs of urban expansion or elite activity. The absence of substantial imports or hoards suggests self-sufficient, small-scale farmsteads rather than hubs, marking a transitional phase before intensified Roman military presence.

Roman Citadels and Nabatean Influences

During the Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman periods, the military function of the Tel Arad mound persisted through a sequence of forts, with Stratum V dated to the Persian era, Stratum IV to the Hellenistic period, and Stratum III representing the Roman fort. These structures repurposed earlier fortifications, underscoring the site's enduring strategic value along southern trade and defense routes in the Negev. Herodian-era modifications, circa 37–4 BCE, included renovations to the ancient well and the construction of additional plastered cisterns for , facilitating sustained occupation amid the arid environment. These enhancements aligned with broader regional efforts to bolster under Herod the Great's rule as a Roman client king, though the site saw no major citadel rebuild beyond fort maintenance. Nabatean influences appear indirectly through the Negev's trade networks, where the kingdom's control until its annexation by in 106 CE introduced advanced hydraulic techniques; while no dedicated Nabatean structures are attested at Tel Arad, regional styles and water management practices likely impacted local adaptations, as evidenced by the persistence of systems suited to desert conditions. By the late Roman and early Byzantine phases, activity waned, with the site abandoned after the 4th century CE due to shifting economic priorities and environmental pressures, leading to a hiatus until Early Islamic resettlement.

Islamic Period Reuse and Decline

During the Early Islamic period, the ruins of the Roman citadel at Tel Arad were repurposed as a waystation, functioning as a fortified caravansary to accommodate travelers and merchants along key trade routes connecting the Judean Hills to the south and east. This reuse, designated Stratum II in excavation , reflects the site's enduring strategic value at regional crossroads despite centuries of prior disuse following . Occupation spanned the 7th to 10th centuries CE, aligning with Umayyad and Abbasid rule, during which the structure operated as an for , providing and amid arid . Limited archaeological remains from this phase include architectural modifications to the citadel for waystation purposes, though detailed artifact assemblages such as pottery or coins specific to Tel Arad remain underreported compared to contemporaneous sites. The facility fell into disuse by the CE, leading to the site's abandonment as a and transition to sporadic, non-urban activity thereafter. This decline coincided with broader shifts in regional trade dynamics and settlement patterns in the southern Levant, though direct causal factors at Tel Arad are not conclusively identified in excavation records.

Excavation History

Early 20th-Century Surveys

The Survey of Western Palestine, undertaken by the Palestine Exploration Fund from 1872 to 1878 under Claude Reignier Conder and Herbert Kitchener, provided the earliest systematic mapping of Tel Arad. The survey documented the site's prominent tel, rising about 25 meters above the surrounding plain, and noted scattered ruins indicative of ancient occupation, including visible Roman-era structures in the lower settlement area..jpg) Local Bedouin tradition preserved the place-name "Arad," which scholars linked to the biblical city referenced in Numbers 21:1 and Joshua 12:14, facilitating early identification despite the site's peripheral location in the Negev. This naming continuity, observed during 19th-century explorations, underscored the tel's potential historical significance without deeper stratigraphic investigation at the time.

Yohanan Aharoni Expeditions (1960s-1980s)

Yohanan Aharoni, chairman of the Department of Archaeology at , initiated systematic excavations at Tel Arad in 1962, co-directing the first season with Ruth Amiran. The work focused primarily on the upper fortress mound, revealing Judahite layers through probing trenches and area excavations that exposed fortifications, , and inner structures. Over 18 seasons spanning the to the early —though Aharoni led until his death in 1976—the expeditions uncovered 23 stratigraphic layers across the site, encompassing , , and occupations, with the upper strata (I–XII) attributed to the Judahite monarchy. The inaugural 1962 season yielded the site's most significant early find: a temple complex within the fortress, featuring a , , burners, and a with standing stones, dated by Aharoni to Stratum X ( BCE) and persisting into later phases until deliberate decommissioning around Stratum VIII. Subsequent seasons, particularly 1964–1967, produced over 200 ostraca, including Hebrew and inscriptions from administrative contexts in Strata VIII–VI, detailing military logistics, rations, and correspondence linked to Judahite border defense. These artifacts, many found near gate and wall loci, evidenced literate bureaucracy under kings like . Aharoni developed a stratigraphic aligning the fortress's phases with , dating Stratum XII to the late BCE (post-Solomonic expansion), major rebuilds in Strata XI–X to the , and destructions in Strata VII (Assyrian, ca. 701 BCE) and IV (Babylonian, ca. 586 BCE) to known conquests, based on , seals, and destruction layers. He identified Tel Arad as the biblical Arad of the , proposing its role as a outpost controlling routes, supported by ostraca mentioning places like and Egyptian toponyms. Aharoni's interpretations emphasized continuity in Judahite , though later scholars debated his high for early strata against low chronology advocates favoring later dates by decades.

Modern Analyses and Renewed Studies

In 2020, researchers at applied forensic handwriting analysis combined with algorithms to 18 ostraca from Tel Arad, dated to circa 600 BCE, identifying handwriting from at least 12 distinct authors and suggesting widespread among military personnel in the Kingdom of Judah during the late . This approach built on earlier image-processing techniques but incorporated police forensics expertise to differentiate subtle stylistic variations, challenging prior assumptions of limited scribal training confined to elites. Chemical analysis of residues on two limestone altars from the Tel Arad shrine, conducted in 2020 and published in the journal Tel Aviv, detected cannabinoids including THC, CBD, and CBN on the smaller altar, mixed with animal dung for combustion, marking the earliest known use of in a controlled ancient Near Eastern ritual context from the 8th century BCE. The larger altar yielded traces, indicating complementary aromatic offerings in Judahite practices, with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry confirming the plant origins absent natural degradation over millennia. A 2025 study in the Jerusalem Journal of Archaeology re-examined the using quantitative textual analysis to uncover early 6th-century BCE administrative notations tracking time in months and days, distances, and provisions like and wine allotments, revealing a sophisticated numerical system for possibly aligned with a six-day operational cycle. This work highlights the ostraca's role in documenting routine supply management under siege conditions, with notations implying decimal-based reckoning predating standardized calendars. Ongoing projects by the Nelson Glueck School of include targeted investigations of infrastructure at Tel Arad, such as the water system beneath the citadel, integrating geophysical surveys with legacy artifact reappraisal to refine stratigraphic interpretations.

Archaeological Significance

Insights into Judahite Religion and Literacy

The temple complex at Tel Arad, constructed in the 10th-9th centuries BCE and active until its decommissioning around 700 BCE, exhibits architectural features paralleling descriptions of the Temple, including a tripartite layout with a containing two standing stones interpreted as representations of divine presence, supporting its dedication to as the primary deity of Judah. Excavations by Yohanan Aharoni revealed no idols or figurines of or other deities within the temple structure, distinguishing it from contemporaneous sites where syncretistic elements appear in material remains, though two —one larger for sacrifices and a smaller horned one—suggest ritual offerings consistent with Yahwistic cult practices. Residues on the smaller altar, analyzed via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, included cannabinoids from and , indicating psychoactive and aromatic elements in Judahite rituals around 750-715 BCE, though without textual corroboration for specific rites. Over 100 ostraca inscribed in Hebrew , dated to circa 600 BCE during the late II, document administrative and military correspondence at the fortress, evidencing among Judahite personnel beyond elite scribes. Algorithmic handwriting analysis of 18 key texts identifies at least 12 distinct authors, with variations in script suggesting training in Paleo-Hebrew among officers, quartermasters, and , reflecting a decentralized yet proficient bureaucratic system in the Kingdom of Judah. 18 explicitly references provisions for the "," linking to temple and implying scriptural familiarity in regional administration. Lmlk (belonging to the king) seals on storage jar handles, recovered from the fortress strata dated to the late BCE, bear royal iconography of a four-winged scarab or sun disk, attesting to a centralized Judahite economy and distribution network under kings like , which facilitated state-supported cultic activities. These seals, numbering dozens at Arad among hundreds across Judahite sites, coordinated and wine shipments, underscoring economic integration with religious oversight, as inferred from their association with fortified temples and administrative ostraca.

Evidence for Biblical Historicity

Archaeological strata at Tel Arad reveal a series of Judahite fortresses from the 10th to 6th centuries BCE, with major construction phases in the 9th and 8th centuries BCE corresponding to the Kingdom of Judah's expansion into the Negev desert for military and trade control. The site's casemate walls and administrative structures align with biblical accounts of southern border fortifications under kings like Uzziah and Hezekiah, who secured the region against Edomite incursions and Philistine threats, as described in 2 Kings 18:8 and 2 Chronicles 26:10. Excavator Yohanan Aharoni dated certain strata to the late 8th century BCE, including evidence of destruction layers potentially linked to Hezekiah's centralizing reforms, which dismantled peripheral cult sites to consolidate power in Jerusalem (2 Kings 18:4). Over 100 ostraca discovered in the fortress's Stratum VI, dating to circa 600 BCE, bear inscriptions in Paleo-Hebrew script using vocabulary and syntax identical to . These texts document , troop movements, and distributions, with names such as Eliashib (commander) and Pashhur echoing figures in biblical narratives like 20:1. Notably, Ostracon 18 references the "house of YHWH" alongside requests for provisions, paralleling scriptural depictions of temple-associated asylum and royal administration during the late monarchy (e.g., 1 Kings 8:31-32). Such administrative phrases and provide direct linguistic convergences with the Hebrew Bible's portrayal of Judahite . Handwriting analysis of 18 by researchers identified at least 12 distinct authors through and forensic techniques, indicating literacy extended beyond elite scribes to around 600 BCE. This empirical evidence of widespread alphabetic proficiency in late Judah contradicts models assuming low rates that would preclude early composition of extensive texts like the Pentateuch, favoring origins in the 8th-7th centuries BCE during the monarchic period rather than post-exilic invention. The findings, published in peer-reviewed studies, underscore a robust scribal culture capable of producing and transmitting the scriptural corpus contemporaneously with the events described.

Debates on Syncretism and Cult Practices

Archaeological excavations at the Judahite shrine in Tel Arad uncovered a containing two monolithic standing stones (massebot) flanking a niche, alongside two altars—one larger and one smaller—dated primarily to the 9th–8th centuries BCE. Some scholars interpret the paired massebot as emblematic of , positing they symbolized alongside a consort such as , drawing analogies to textual references from sites like and broader patterns in folk Israelite religion where sacred trees or pillars evoked Canaanite fertility deities. , for instance, argues such dual symbols reflect entrenched popular practices integrating pre-Israelite elements, challenging notions of uniform Yahwistic orthodoxy. Opposing views emphasize the absence of epigraphic evidence at Arad for or other non-Yahwistic entities, attributing the massebot to aniconic Yahwistic symbolism where stones served as abstract divine seats or memorials, a practice later proscribed under Deuteronomistic reforms as potentially idolatrous despite initial legitimacy. Biblical condemnations of massebot in texts like Deuteronomy 16:22 and 2 Kings 18:4 suggest they were perceived as conducive to syncretic drift, yet the Arad installation's lack of figurative icons or foreign motifs aligns more closely with core Yahwistic than overt . Residue analysis on the further fuels debate: the smaller altar yielded carbonized flowers with elevated content, deliberately burned without seeds to maximize psychoactivity, while the larger bore , animal fats, and plant oils, indicating distinct ritual functions around 750–715 BCE. Advocates for highlight the as evidence of ecstatic rites paralleling Canaanite or Near Eastern shamanistic inducement of , atypical of textual descriptions of Judahite sacrifice and potentially signaling foreign influences or popular deviations from elite . Counterarguments posit compatibility with Yahwistic prophetic ecstasy, as in 1 10:6, where no polytheistic invocation is required, though the empirical rarity of such residues limits causal links to and underscores interpretive reliance on broader cultural contexts. These findings intersect with Deuteronomistic narratives of 7th-century BCE centralization under kings like and , which targeted peripheral shrines for destruction to curb perceived syncretic high-place cults, as evidenced by Arad's abandonment circa 701–586 BCE. While artifacts empirically demonstrate localized cultic adaptations, the debate persists over whether they evince deliberate blending with Canaanite practices or merely pre-reform variants of , with source biases in biblical polemics favoring stricter complicating neutral assessment.

Recent Scientific Examinations

In 2020, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of organic residues adhering to two altars excavated from the Judahite at Tel Arad identified (THC), (CBD), and from flowers, alongside profiles consistent with (). These findings, derived from solvent extraction and spectral comparison with modern reference samples, indicate that psychoactive was burned in cultic rituals alongside imported , challenging prior assumptions of exclusively non-psychoactive aromatics in Judahite worship and suggesting influences from broader Near Eastern practices. Advanced imaging and computational techniques have illuminated the site's epigraphic corpus. applied to Arad ostracon 16 in 2017 revealed previously invisible Hebrew text referencing administrative matters, expanding the legible content from the 7th-century BCE Judahite fortress. Complementing this, a 2020 study utilizing on handwriting features from the 88 known ostraca distinguished at least 12 distinct scribal hands through of letter forms and stroke variations, evidencing decentralized among rather than a small scribal class. Radiocarbon dating of charred seeds from Early contexts at Tel Arad, published in 2017, yielded calibrated dates spanning approximately 20 years for Stratum III (ca. 2850–2830 BCE), supporting a model of brief urban occupation and rather than centuries-long continuity, thus refining Amiran’s original stratigraphic interpretations through Bayesian modeling of 14C results against destruction layers. While strata at Arad align with high chronology frameworks in ongoing debates, lacking site-specific recent 14C suites, its destruction horizons continue to anchor comparative assessments with radiocarbon data from contemporaneous sites like Tel Rehov.

References

  1. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/ancient-arad
  2. https://en.parks.org.il/reserve-park/tel-arad-national-park/
  3. https://whitelevy.fas.harvard.edu/fortress-mound-tel-arad-excavated-yohanan-aharoni-1962-1967
  4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233528650_The_Fortress_Mound_at_Tel_Arad_an_Interim_Report
  5. https://library.biblicalarchaeology.org/article/arad-an-ancient-israelite-fortress-with-a-temple-to-yahweh/
  6. https://madainproject.com/tel_arad_temple
  7. https://publications.iaa.org.il/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?filename=1&article=1067&context=iaareports&type=additional
  8. https://www.holylandsite.com/arad
  9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140196312000031
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S014019631200047X
  11. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsl/books/book/1656/chapter/107480950/A-tale-of-two-cities-in-ancient-CanaanHow-the
  12. https://www.biblewalks.com/timna/
  13. https://www.academia.edu/23190918/The_Fortress_Mound_at_Tel_Arad_an_Interim_Report
  14. https://www.wallawalla.edu/academics/areas-of-study/theology/bible-lands-study-tours/2017-student-bible-lands-study-tour/itinerary/days-14-17
  15. https://ngsba.org/excavations/tel-arad/
  16. https://holylandphotos.wordpress.com/2015/09/07/israelite-cisterns-at-arad-now-open-negev-of-israel/
  17. https://cojs.org/the-well-at-arad/
  18. https://www.academia.edu/32438737/Water_Systems_in_Bronze_and_Iron_Age_Israel_Encyclopedia_of_the_History_of_Science_Technology_and_Medicine_in_Non_Western_Cultures_
  19. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Numbers+21%3A1-3&version=ESV
  20. https://www.preceptaustin.org/numbers-21-commentary
  21. https://biblehub.com/joshua/12-14.htm
  22. https://www.waynestiles.com/blog/tel-arad-israels-point-of-impatience-with-god/
  23. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+1%3A16-17&version=ESV
  24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3622336
  25. https://www.christian-thinktank.com/noai.html
  26. https://whitelevy.fas.harvard.edu/publications/horvet-%25E2%2580%2598uza-and-horvat-radum-two-fortresses-biblical-negev-0
  27. https://www.biblewalks.com/telarad/
  28. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1522200113
  29. https://english.tau.ac.il/news/Literacy-in-the-biblic-times
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319698715_Radiocarbon_Assessment_of_Early_Bronze_Arad_The_20_Year_Lifespan_of_Stratum_II
  31. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.2307/1356481
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225594441_The_Chalcolithic_Period_of_the_Southern_Levant_A_Synthetic_Review
  33. https://journals.openedition.org/paleorient/556
  34. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/change-in-metal-production-from-the-chalcolithic-period-to-the-early-bronze-age-in-israel-and-jordan/23E8CD8BD29D13EF107398EDDBA6CCFC
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027737911530127X
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309453935_The_Transition_from_the_Chalcolithic_to_the_Early_Bronze_Age_of_the_Southern_Levant_in_socioeconomic_context
  37. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/radiocarbon/article/chronology-of-the-early-bronze-age-in-the-southern-levant-new-analysis-for-a-high-chronology/B447FACD103BFFE3E9E1C3EB40934AFF
  38. https://www.academia.edu/44928645/The_Southern_Levant_Cisjordan_during_the_Early_Bronze_Age
  39. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/radiocarbon/article/early-bronze-age-chronology-radiocarbon-dates-and-chronological-models-from-tel-yarmuth-israel/68B36B787AFD29C3320744C876BF210B
  40. https://isac.uchicago.edu/research/symposia/earlymiddle-bronze-age-transition-ancient-near-east-chronology-c14-and-climate
  41. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/archaeology-of-the-bronze-age-levant/urbanism-and-its-demise-in-the-early-bronze-ii-and-iii/B7CB62423B49CA8E652456E6DF436B14
  42. https://www.adssc.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/The-Dating-of-Early-Bronze-Age.pdf
  43. https://madainproject.com/tel_arad
  44. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/aasp/palynology/article/38/2/280/87145/Dead-Sea-pollen-record-and-history-of-human
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282826125_Climate_and_the_Late_Bronze_Collapse_New_Evidence_from_the_Southern_Levant
  46. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/bronze-age-collapse-pollen-study-highlights-late-bronze-age-drought/
  47. https://biblicalhistoricalcontext.com/israelite-origins/israelite-origins-putting-away-childish-things/
  48. https://www.imj.org.il/en/collections/369406-0
  49. https://www.imj.org.il/en/collections/369839-0
  50. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-military-correspondence-send-wine/
  51. https://escholarship.org/content/qt7xj3b51h/qt7xj3b51h_noSplash_1741999239995fb1b54901acc8b7a720.pdf
  52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27926109
  53. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26751881
  54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349039424_The_Potter%27s_Will_Spheres_of_Production_Distribution_and_Consumption_of_the_Late_Iron_Age_Southern_Transjordan-Negev_Pottery_Strata_The_Bulletin_of_the_Anglo-Israel_Archaeological_Society_29_2011_61-1
  55. https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/bitstream/123456789/6791/4/self-destruction-diversity-negev-towns.pdf
  56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23631347
  57. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/arad
  58. https://madainproject.com/tel_arad_citadel
  59. https://library.biblicalarchaeology.org/sidebar/dates-of-the-strata-at-arad/
  60. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1356597
  61. https://www.scribd.com/document/498833499/Arad-Its-Inscriptions-and-Temple
  62. https://cojs.org/arad_archive-_900_bce-early_6th_century_bce/
  63. https://www.thetorah.com/article/hezekiahs-reform-the-archeological-evidence
  64. https://www.academia.edu/2632501/The_Debate_over_the_Chronology_of_the_Iron_Age_in_the_Southern_Levant_its_History_the_Current_Situation_and_a_Suggested_Resolution_2005
  65. https://www.timesofisrael.com/police-forensics-joins-ai-algorithms-to-track-down-who-wrote-the-bible-and-when/
  66. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/09/200910110828.htm
  67. https://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/2020-09-09/ty-article/.premium/csi-expert-helps-archaeologists-nail-writers-of-2-600-year-old-letters/0000017f-e9c8-dea7-adff-f9fb5aba0000
  68. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/05/200529093125.htm
  69. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/cannabis-found-altar-ancient-israeli-shrine-180975016/
  70. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/marijuana-found-at-ancient-temple-in-israel/
  71. https://www.timesofisrael.com/how-did-biblical-judeans-track-time-trove-of-6th-century-bce-inscriptions-offers-clues/
  72. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395409588_Measuring_Time_Distance_and_Mass_in_the_Arad_Fortress_Early_6th_Century_BCE
  73. https://www.academia.edu/23190922/Perspectives_on_Southern_Israels_Cult_Centralization_Arad_and_Beer_scheba
  74. https://biblicalhebrew.com/the-arad-ostraca-ca-600-bce/
  75. https://www.academia.edu/19557645/_Massebot_Standing_for_Yahweh_The_Fall_of_a_Yhwistic_Cult_Symbol_
  76. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/ancient-israel/asherah-and-the-asherim-goddess-or-cult-symbol/
  77. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03344355.2020.1732046
  78. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321087153_A_Brand_New_Old_Inscription_Arad_Ostracon_16_Rediscovered_via_Multispectral_Imaging
  79. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03344355.2017.1357309
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.