Hubbry Logo
ImbrianImbrianMain
Open search
Imbrian
Community hub
Imbrian
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Imbrian
Imbrian
Imbrian
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Imbrian
3850 – 3200 Ma
Chronology
−4500 —
–
−4000 —
–
−3500 —
–
−3000 —
–
−2500 —
–
−2000 —
–
−1500 —
–
−1000 —
–
−500 —
–
0 —
 
 
 
Periods on the Lunar Geologic Timescale. Axis scale: Millions of years ago.
Usage information
Celestial bodyEarth's Moon
Time scale(s) usedLunar Geologic Timescale
Definition
Chronological unitPeriod

The Imbrian is a lunar geologic period divided into two epochs, the Early and Late.

Early Imbrian

[edit]

In the lunar geologic timescale, the Early Imbrian epoch occurred from 3,850 million years ago to about 3,800 million years ago. It overlaps the end of the Late Heavy Bombardment of the Inner Solar System. The impact that created the huge Mare Imbrium basin occurred at the start of the epoch. The other large basins that dominate the lunar near side (such as Mare Crisium, Mare Tranquillitatis, Mare Serenitatis, and Mare Fecunditatis) were also formed in this period. These basins filled with basalt mostly during the subsequent Late Imbrian epoch. The Early Imbrian was preceded by the Nectarian.[1]

Late Imbrian

[edit]
Lunar olivine basalt formed around 3.3 billion years ago. This is part of sample 15555, known as Great Scott.

In the Lunar geologic timescale, the Late Imbrian epoch occurred between 3,800 million years ago to about 3,200 million years ago. It was the epoch during which the mantle below the lunar basins partially melted and filled them with basalt. The melting is thought to have occurred because the impacts of the Early Imbrian thinned the overlying rock – either causing the mantle to rise because of the reduced pressure on it, bringing molten material closer to the surface, or the top melting as heat flowed upwards through the mantle because of reduced overlying thermal insulation. The majority of lunar samples returned to earth for study come from this epoch.[2][3]


References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Imbrian

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Imbrian is a major division of the lunar geologic timescale, spanning approximately 3.85 to 3.2 billion years ago and marking a transition from intense basin-forming impacts to widespread volcanic resurfacing of the Moon's surface. This period is defined by the excavation of prominent multi-ring basins, including the Imbrium and Orientale basins, which occurred during its early phase around 3.85 to 3.80 billion years ago, contributing to the decline in large-scale cratering rates following the Nectarian period. The Imbrian is subdivided into the Early Imbrian and Late Imbrian epochs, with the former dominated by ejecta deposits from basin impacts, such as the Fra Mauro Formation—a widespread blanket of breccias averaging 550 meters thick—while the latter saw the emplacement of basaltic lavas that formed the dark lunar covering about 16% of the Moon's surface. Key stratigraphic units from this era include the Cayley and Apennine Bench Formations, representing plains materials post-dating the Imbrium event but pre-dating mare flooding. Volcanic activity intensified during the Late Imbrian, with erupting through the thinned crust to fill impact basins, though non-mare highland volcanism, as seen in features like the Gruithuisen and Mairan domes, also occurred and produced morphologically distinct extrusive rocks. The Imbrian period's significance lies in its role during the tail end of the hypothesized , a spike in impacts that reshaped the lunar highlands, while also initiating the long decline of endogenic activity that shaped the Moon's visible terrain today. Tectonic features from this time, such as thrust faulting in basin margins, were largely confined to local scales due to the Moon's cooling interior, with minimal global effects post-Imbrium. Overall, the Imbrian represents a pivotal in lunar evolution, bridging cataclysmic with the more quiescent eras that followed.

Overview

Definition

The Imbrian is a geologic period in the Moon's stratigraphic timescale, representing a key phase in lunar history characterized by the decline of major impact events and the onset of extensive volcanic resurfacing. It spans approximately from 3.85 to 3.2 billion years ago (Ga), following the Nectarian period and preceding the Eratosthenian. The period's name derives from the prominent basin, whose ejecta deposits form a stratigraphic marker for its base, as originally proposed in early lunar mapping efforts. The Imbrian is subdivided into two epochs based on stratigraphic and radiometric boundaries tied to major geological events. The Early Imbrian epoch extends from about 3.85 to 3.80 Ga, encompassing the formation of the largest preserved impact basins. The Late Imbrian epoch follows, lasting from roughly 3.80 to 3.2 Ga, and is distinguished by a marked reduction in basin-scale impacts and the initiation of prolonged mare basalt . This period signifies a critical transition in lunar evolution, shifting from the intense heavy bombardment of earlier epochs—marked by frequent giant impacts—to a phase dominated by internal magmatic processes that flooded impact basins with basaltic lavas, fundamentally altering the Moon's surface morphology and composition. These changes established much of the Moon's modern highland-mare dichotomy, with Imbrian deposits providing essential context for understanding solar system bombardment histories.

Timeline and Chronology

The Imbrian period in lunar geology spans approximately 650 million years, from about 3.85 billion years ago (Ga) to 3.2 Ga, marking a transitional phase from intense basin-forming impacts to widespread . The lower boundary with the preceding Nectarian period is defined by the formation of the Imbrium basin at ~3.85 Ga, based on stratigraphic superposition of units and calibrated radiometric ages from impact melt rocks. The upper boundary with the Eratosthenian period is placed at ~3.2 Ga, defined by the age of the Eratosthenes crater marking the transition to smaller impact features, although continued into the Eratosthenian and later periods. This period is subdivided into the Early Imbrian (~3.85–3.80 Ga), dominated by impact events, and the Late Imbrian (~3.80–3.2 Ga), characterized by prolonged volcanic resurfacing. Dating of the Imbrian chronology relies primarily on radiometric techniques applied to lunar samples returned by Apollo and Luna missions, including argon-argon (⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar) and rubidium-strontium (⁸⁷Rb/⁸⁷Sr) methods, which provide precise crystallization ages for impact melts and basaltic rocks. For instance, ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar dating of Fra Mauro Formation samples from yields ages around 3.85–3.92 Ga for Imbrium-related materials, anchoring the lower boundary. Complementary crater counting methods, using size-frequency distributions from imagery acquired during Apollo and Luna missions, calibrate relative ages against these radiometric anchors to estimate surface exposure times across unsampled regions. Uncertainties in the Imbrian timeline arise from the overlapping signatures of impact ejecta and subsequent volcanic overprints, which can obscure stratigraphic relations and lead to age discrepancies of up to 100 million years for boundary definitions. These challenges have been addressed through post-Apollo missions, notably the (LRO), which provides high-resolution imagery enabling refined crater counts and more accurate modeling of resurfacing rates, thus tightening estimates for Late Imbrian mare units to within 50–100 million years. Recent samples from the Chang'e-5 mission (as of 2021) confirm mare basalts as young as ~2.0 Ga in later periods, further refining the overall volcanic timeline beyond the Imbrian.

Geological Context

Position in Lunar Timescale

The lunar geologic timescale divides the Moon's history into five primary periods based on stratigraphic superposition, crater morphology, and : the , Nectarian, Imbrian, Eratosthenian, and Copernican. These divisions reflect a progression from early, high-intensity impact cratering to later, lower-rate processes dominated by and . The Imbrian period constitutes the third major stratigraphic division, succeeding the and Nectarian eras of predominantly cataclysmic basin formation. It acts as a pivotal bridge in lunar history, marking the culmination of large-scale impact events—such as those forming the Imbrium and Orientale basins—with the emergent phase of extensive that resurfaced significant portions of the lunar highlands. This transition is evident in the declining cratering flux, from around 40-50 basin-scale impacts in preceding periods to just two major ones (Imbrium and Orientale) during the Early Imbrian, alongside the initial outpouring of basaltic lavas that would define the maria. Key stratigraphic units assigned to the Imbrian encompass impact-related deposits like the Fra Mauro Formation, comprising blankets from the Imbrium basin that blanket vast highland regions, and the Hevelius Formation, consisting of layered and secondary craters from the Orientale basin. Basin rim materials, including massifs and knobby terrains such as the Montes Rook Formation, further characterize this period, while early mare basalts represent the volcanic infilling of these structures, forming smooth plains with low crater densities. These units collectively overlie Nectarian materials and are overlain by Eratosthenian deposits, establishing the Imbrian's clear position in the . For comparative planetary geology, the Imbrian period aligns temporally with Earth's early eon (approximately 3.85 to 3.2 billion years ago), an interval of analogous heavy bombardment that influenced crustal evolution on both bodies. This overlap underscores the Imbrian's role in reconstructing shared solar system dynamics, including impactor fluxes and their effects on .

Preceding Nectarian Period

The Nectarian period, spanning approximately 3.92 to 3.85 billion years ago (Ga), represents a phase of intense impact bombardment on the , marked by the formation of several large multi-ring basins that reshaped the lunar crust. This era began with the Nectaris basin impact, which produced the Janssen Formation blanket and served as the stratigraphic marker for the onset of the Nectarian. Subsequent basins, including Humorum in the late Nectarian, contributed to widespread deposition and crustal disruption, with Humorum's formation estimated at around 3.9 Ga based on crater counting and radiometric constraints. These events excavated deep into the lunar highlands, exposing anorthositic materials and altering the pre-existing highland terrain through shock metamorphism and melting. The transition from the Nectarian to the Imbrian period culminated the (LHB), a hypothesized episode of elevated impact flux across the inner Solar System from roughly 4.1 to 3.8 Ga, with the Imbrium basin impact at approximately 3.85 Ga defining the boundary. The Imbrium event, producing the Fra Mauro Formation, overlaid and partially obscured earlier Nectarian deposits, signaling a shift from basin-dominated cratering to a declining flux that allowed mare volcanism to emerge later. This boundary reflects not only stratigraphic superposition but also a potential dynamical change in the impactor population, possibly linked to migration. Geological remnants of the Nectarian period persist as layers beneath Imbrian basins, influencing the overall lunar through buried highland materials and impact breccias. For instance, the Janssen Formation from Nectaris underlies the Fra Mauro Formation of Imbrium, creating a composite sequence that records the progressive buildup of impact debris. These layers, often mixed with highland rocks, provide critical evidence for reconstructing crustal evolution and have been mapped via and Apollo samples. Debates persist regarding the LHB's intensity and duration, with some models favoring a short-lived cataclysmic spike around 3.9 Ga and others proposing a more prolonged decline from 4.2 Ga onward, potentially without a distinct peak. Evidence from lunar meteorites, including impact melt ages clustering between 3.5 and 4.0 Ga, supports elevated activity extending into the late Nectarian, suggesting a possible flux maximum just prior to the Imbrian transition at around 3.85 Ga. Lunar samples indicate basin-scale impacts around 4.22 Ga, challenging a purely terminal cataclysm and implying a sawtooth in bombardment rates.

Early Imbrian

Basin-Forming Impacts

The Early Imbrian epoch is defined by a series of cataclysmic impact events that sculpted the lunar surface through the formation of large multi-ring basins, with serving as the primary example. These basins, exemplified by the Imbrium and Orientale basins, were primarily formed between approximately 3.85 and 3.80 billion years ago (Ga), marking the onset of this period following the Nectarian. of impact melt rocks and crater counting from lunar samples, such as those from Apollo missions, confirm this temporal clustering, with Imbrium's formation anchoring the epoch's base. These basin-forming impacts resulted from collisions with large asteroids, typically tens to hundreds of kilometers in , generating transient craters that expanded into complex multi-ring structures due to the Moon's elastic-plastic response. The involved high-velocity excavation, where the impactor's energy vaporized and ejected material to depths exceeding 20-30 km, penetrating the anorthositic crust (estimated 30-50 km thick at the time) and exposing underlying mantle . For instance, the Imbrium impact excavated over 5 × 10^6 km³ of crustal material, redistributing it radially and creating topographic rings through rebound and viscous relaxation. Similar processes shaped the other listed basins, though their ring morphologies vary due to differences in impact , target properties, and pre-existing . Ejecta from these events blanketed vast regions, with the Fra Mauro Formation representing the primary Imbrium-derived deposit, consisting of shocked breccias and melt fragments transported ballistically and as fallback material. This formation extends over hundreds of kilometers from the basin rim, covering approximately 10% of the lunar nearside surface and burying pre-existing highlands. samples from Fra Mauro confirmed its composition as dominantly Imbrium ejecta, with isotopic ages aligning to ~3.85 Ga. Ejecta from companion basins like Orientale contributed overlapping layers, forming regionally continuous plains that obscure older Nectarian features. The immediate consequences of these impacts were profound, triggering global seismic waves that propagated through the lunar interior, causing widespread fracturing and observable in modern . Such seismic activity likely induced localized in , potentially accelerating subsequent volcanic resurfacing by thinning the and creating pathways for ascent, as evidenced by temporal correlations between Imbrium impact melts and early mare basalts. Overall, these events resurfaced up to 15% of the Moon's surface with blankets, erasing much of the prior cratered terrain and setting the stage for later geological evolution.

Relation to Late Heavy Bombardment

The (LHB) hypothesis posits a spike in impact rates across the inner solar system approximately 4.1 to 3.8 billion years ago (Ga), characterized by an elevated flux of asteroids and comets following the initial accretion phase of the . This period is thought to have resulted from dynamical instabilities, such as the migration of the giant , which destabilized the and scattered planetesimals inward, as simulated in the Nice model framework. In this model, Jupiter's with outer ejected material from the trans-Neptunian disk, leading to a transient increase in collisions with terrestrial bodies. The Early epoch, spanning roughly 3.9 to 3.8 Ga, temporally overlaps with the terminal phase of the LHB, during which the largest lunar basins formed as the bombardment waned. Key examples include the Imbrium basin, dated to approximately 3.91 Ga via radiometric analysis of impact ejecta, representing one of the final major LHB events that reshaped the lunar highlands. Evidence for this connection comes from high-impact melt rocks recovered by Apollo missions, such as breccias from the Fra Mauro formation, which yield U-Pb and ^{40}Ar-^{39}Ar ages clustering around 3.9 Ga, consistent with widespread melting and mixing during the bombardment's decline. These rocks exhibit shock features and geochemical signatures indicative of basin-scale impacts, linking them directly to Imbrian-age events. Supporting observations include dynamical simulations from the Nice model, which reproduce the observed lunar cratering record by predicting a 100- to 1000-fold increase in impact flux over 100-200 million years, aligning with the formation of 10-20 major basins. Additionally, isotopic studies of lunar zircons reveal age clusters and potential impact-induced resetting around 4.0 Ga, with some grains showing positive anomalies suggestive of oxidation during post-impact tied to LHB heating. These data, combined with meteorite shock ages, bolster the case for a punctuated end to the bombardment during the Imbrian. Debates persist regarding the LHB's scope, with questions about whether it was a solar system-wide phenomenon or primarily lunar, potentially exaggerated by sampling biases in Apollo-era rocks. Recent post-2020 analyses, including those from China's Chang'e-6 mission samples returned in 2024, challenge the uniformity of the LHB by revealing a lack of expected age clusters in far-side impactites from the Apollo basin (within the Pole-Aitken basin), suggesting a more gradual decline in impacts rather than a discrete spike. These findings, supported by reevaluations of in lunar minerals, imply that the apparent Imbrian clustering may reflect analytical artifacts rather than a true cataclysm.

Late Imbrian

Volcanic Flooding Events

The volcanic flooding events of the Late Imbrian epoch represent the primary phase of mare basalt emplacement on the , occurring between approximately 3.8 and 3.2 billion years ago (Ga), with peak activity around 3.5 Ga. These events infilled large impact basins formed during the preceding Early Imbrian, such as those underlying and , creating vast dark plains that cover about 16% of the lunar surface, predominantly on the nearside. The basaltic lavas produced during this period lowered the overall of affected regions, making the maria prominent features visible from even to the . Prominent examples of these flooding events include the extensive basalt flows in , , , and , where successive eruptions partially or completely filled basin floors and surrounding lowlands. In , for instance, lavas spread across an area exceeding 1,200 km in diameter, forming a relatively flat, radar-smooth surface punctuated by subtle ridges and sinuous rilles. Similar infilling occurred in , a more isolated circular basin, where basalts created a distinct dark "sea" contrasting with the surrounding highlands. These maria exemplify the widespread nature of Late Imbrian , which favored nearside topographic lows due to thinner crust and higher heat flow in that hemisphere. The eruptions were predominantly effusive, characterized by low-viscosity lava flows originating from linear fissures and vents rather than central cones, enabling rapid flooding of basin interiors. Individual flow units typically ranged from 20 to 220 meters in thickness, though cumulative deposits in major basins like Imbrium reached averages of about 1 kilometer, with some localized accumulations exceeding this depth. These flows advanced over distances of hundreds of kilometers at inferred initial rates of several meters per second, slowing over distance, ponding in depressions and smoothing pre-existing cratered terrain while preserving subtle lobate margins and wrinkle ridges from post-emplacement contraction. Compositionally, the dominant rock type was tholeiitic , featuring high iron and aluminum contents with low silica, which contributed to the lavas' fluidity and dark appearance. Titanium-rich variants, containing up to 10-15 weight percent TiO₂, were particularly prevalent along the margins of , such as in the western portions of , where enrichment enhanced the spectral contrast of these flows. These compositional trends reflect derivation from mantle sources with varying degrees of , resulting in a from low-titanium to very high-titanium basalts across different maria.

Mantle Melting Mechanisms

The primary mechanisms driving melting during the Late Imbrian period involved impact-induced decompression melting, where large basin-forming impacts thinned the lunar crust, reducing overlying pressure and allowing partial melts to form in the underlying mantle. This process was particularly effective in regions like the Procellarum , where crustal thinning facilitated the ascent of buoyant magmas from depths of approximately 100–200 km. Additionally, the deposition of thick blankets from these impacts provided , trapping radiogenic heat and delaying conductive cooling of the subsurface, which extended the timeframe for melt generation by up to 200 million years post-impact. Mantle evolution during this epoch featured partial melting of ilmenite-bearing cumulates, dense layers formed from the solidification of the , which underwent overturn and sank into the . These cumulates, enriched in and iron, contributed to the production of titanium-rich basaltic melts as they interacted with overlying peridotitic mantle through plumes driven by gravitational instability. Geochemical analyses of returned lunar samples, such as those from Apollo missions, reveal source regions at these depths characterized by high TiO₂ contents (up to 15 wt%) and signatures indicative of low-degree (1–5%) under conditions. The prolonged duration of Late Imbrian , spanning over 600 million years from approximately 3.8 to 3.2 Ga, was sustained by residual heat retention linked to core-mantle interactions, including from precession-induced tidal effects that maintained elevated temperatures in the . This mechanism allowed for sustained even after the cessation of the lunar core dynamo around 1.5 billion years ago, preventing rapid thermal decay and enabling episodic plume activity. Geochemical models supported by isotopic and trace element data from mare basalts highlight the role of KREEP-rich materials—residual liquids from the enriched in incompatible elements like and —in enhancing melt production through concentrated radiogenic heating. These materials, distributed asymmetrically in the nearside mantle, lowered the solidus temperature of source regions by 50–100°C, promoting higher melt fractions (up to 10%) in KREEP-contaminated cumulates compared to KREEP-poor domains. This is evidenced by elevated Th abundances (5–10 ppm) in Late Imbrian samples, correlating with prolonged magmatic activity in KREEP-enriched provinces.

Scientific Significance

Key Lunar Samples

The Apollo 15 mission returned several key samples from the vicinity of , providing direct evidence of Imbrian-age volcanic activity. Notable among these are green glass spherules, such as those from sample 15426, which have been dated to approximately 3.3–3.4 Ga via ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar and other radiometric methods, indicating origin from fire-fountain eruptions during the Late Imbrian period. These spherules, enriched in volatiles and magnesium, represent primitive mantle-derived melts and constitute a significant portion (up to 28% on average) of the fine-grained glass component in Apollo 15 soils. Samples from other missions further illuminate Imbrian volcanism beyond . The mission retrieved a core from containing basalts dated to around 3.3–3.4 Ga, with ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar ages averaging 3.22 ± 0.04 Ga, showcasing low-titanium compositions typical of Late Imbrian flooding events. Similarly, samples include high-titanium mare basalts, such as those from the Taurus-Littrow valley, with Rb-Sr ages of approximately 3.76 ± 0.06 Ga, reflecting Early Imbrian mantle sources enriched in ilmenite-bearing cumulates. Imbrian-period lunar samples encompass diverse lithologies, including mare basalts, impact breccias, and anorthosites exhibiting overprints from Imbrian events. Mare basalts dominate the returned collection, with varieties ranging from low- to high-titanium types formed by of the lunar mantle. Impact breccias, such as those from near the Apennine Front, incorporate clasts ejected during the Imbrium basin formation and subsequent impacts, often showing shock metamorphism and mixing with volcanic materials. Anorthosites, primarily from highland sites like , display Imbrian overprints through brecciation and melt sheets from secondary impacts, linking pre-Imbrian crust to later modifications. Radiometric dating of these samples, primarily using ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar, Rb-Sr, and Sm-Nd techniques, confirms their placement within the Imbrian epoch (ca. 3.85–3.15 Ga), with the majority of returned lunar basalts—over 80% by volume—dated to the Late Imbrian. This concentration underscores the peak of mare volcanism during this subperiod, as evidenced by isochron analyses across Apollo and Luna collections.

Modern Research and Debates

Recent missions such as the (LRO) and (GRAIL) have provided high-resolution data that refine models of Imbrian basin formation, particularly regarding basin depths and crustal thinning. GRAIL gravity measurements reveal Bouguer anomalies that constrain the diameters of transient craters and impactor sizes for basins like Orientale, estimated at 80 km for a cold thermal profile around 3.81 Ga, while LRO's Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter topography data improves corrections for these models. These post-2010 findings indicate that Imbrian basins exhibit significant crustal thinning, with subsidence depths up to several kilometers in mare-filled regions, influenced by pre-impact crustal thicknesses of 40-60 km and varying thermal states. Ongoing debates center on the timing of the (LHB) decline and the onset of Imbrian , with evidence suggesting a more gradual impact flux rather than a sharp spike at ~3.9 Ga. Analysis of Apollo impact melt ages indicates that apparent clusters around 3.9 Ga may result from diffusion loss and episodic crust formation, supporting a monotonically declining rate through the early Imbrian rather than a cataclysmic event. For onset, mare basalts primarily erupted between 3.9 and 3.1 Ga, but younger activity (<3.0 Ga) challenges models reliant solely on radiogenic heating, as KREEP abundances decline post-Imbrian while eruptions persisted. The role of in prolonging Imbrian volcanic activity remains a point of contention, with models proposing it as a supplementary heat source alongside radiogenic decay. Viscoelastic deformation from Earth's could have generated heating comparable to radiogenic sources, sustaining mare eruptions until ~2 Ga, particularly in the nearside, as evidenced by low-viscosity mantle scenarios in Andrade models. This challenges traditional views that radiogenic heating alone drove post-Imbrian activity, given its insufficient power after 3.2 Ga. Significant gaps persist in samples from far-side Imbrian basins, limiting validation of crustal and mantle models due to the Apollo program's nearside focus. While China's Chang'e-6 mission returned ~2 kg of basalts from the Apollo basin in 2024, revealing cooler interior conditions (~180°C lower than nearside), these represent only localized Eratosthenian material and do not fully address Imbrian . The , particularly Artemis III targeting the South Pole-Aitken basin, is essential for collecting diverse far-side samples to test and models, including Imbrian-aged anorthosites and KREEP-rich terranes. Future research directions emphasize integrating Imbrian geology with studies to model ancient bombardment phases across systems. Lunar impact records, refined by LRO and , serve as analogs for cratering histories on exomoons and rocky s, informing dynamical models of delivery and thresholds during early system evolution.

References

  1. https://www.usgs.gov/publications/geologic-history-moon
  2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/001670379290183J
  3. https://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/books/lunar_stratigraphy/chapter_4.pdf
  4. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.199.4336.1433
  5. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AGUSMCG22A..01C/abstract
  6. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/bf00929277
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225978680_Stratigraphy_and_Isotope_Ages_of_Lunar_Geologic_Units_Chronological_Standard_for_the_Inner_Solar_System
  8. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1962IAUS...14..289S
  9. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abl7957
  10. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1348/report.pdf
  11. https://www.usgs.gov/publications/nectarian-system-a-new-lunar-time-stratigraphic-unit
  12. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/1999JE001130
  13. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-earth-063016-020131
  14. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2024GL111311
  15. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1611535113
  16. https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2012/pdf/1368.pdf
  17. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2011JE003951
  18. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.1500852
  19. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1975LPSC....6.2805H/abstract
  20. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018JE005765
  21. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2011JE003975
  22. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/0880/report.pdf
  23. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19970002903
  24. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Natur.435..466G/abstract
  25. https://www2.boulder.swri.edu/~bottke/Reprints/Bottke_Norman_2017_AnnuRev-Earth-Planet_45_619_Late_Heavy_Bombardment.pdf
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0009281920300945
  27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016703716307281
  28. http://sims.ess.ucla.edu/PDF/Crow_et_al_2016.pdf
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395087236_Collapse_of_the_Lunar_Late_Heavy_Bombardment_Hypothesis_Evidence_from_Chang%27e-6_Samples
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X24003765
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103523001082
  32. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/msa/rimg/article/89/1/453/629977/Lunar-Mare-Basaltic-Volcanism-Volcanic-Features
  33. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2009JE003380
  34. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016JE005041
  35. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19760009914/downloads/19760009914.pdf
  36. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016JE005008
  37. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2002GL014847
  38. https://spj.science.org/doi/10.34133/space.0076
  39. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PSJ.....5...16W
  40. https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2001/pdf/1826.pdf
  41. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-33670-6
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/003192019190003Z
  43. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1974Moon....9..183A
  44. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-023-01362-5
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X1930038X
  46. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19940011769/downloads/19940011769.pdf
  47. https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article/11/2/nwad276/7335311
  48. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aax0883
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095927325008631
  50. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018JE005742
  51. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1979LPSC...10..275D
  52. https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=cas_daes_scholar
  53. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1973LPSC....4..239V
  54. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998M%2526PS...33..921B
  55. https://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/samples/atlas/compendium/Luna24Core.pdf
  56. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1975LPSC....6.1445N
  57. https://sciences.ucf.edu/class/wp-content/uploads/sites/23/2020/02/Neal92_GCA_MareVolcanism.pdf
  58. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/static/history/alsj/a15/A15SampleCat_1.pdf
  59. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19780005023/downloads/19780005023.pdf
  60. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2000je001244
  61. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19780005016/downloads/19780005016.pdf
  62. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2021JE006908
  63. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-38615-1
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12372884/
  65. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JE008828
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11495410/
  67. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/artemis-iii-science-definition-report-12042020c.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.