Hubbry Logo
Verse of purificationVerse of purificationMain
Open search
Verse of purification
Community hub
Verse of purification
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Verse of purification
Verse of purification
Verse of purification
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Part of a series on
Shia Islam
Beliefs and practices
Days of remembrance
History
Branches and sects
Ahl al-Kisa
Holy women
icon Shia Islam portal
Part of a series on
Sunni Islam
Beliefs
Five Pillars
Rashidun Caliphs

Others

Schools of law

Others

Schools of theology

In terms of Ihsan:

Contemporary movements
Holy sites
Lists
Islam portal
Quran
History
Manuscripts
Divisions
Content
Reading
Translations
Exegesis
Characteristics
Related

The verse of purification (Arabic:آية التطهير) refers to verse 33:33 of the Quran, the central religious text in Islam. The verse concerns the status of purity of the Ahl al-Bayt (lit. 'people of the house'), the last passage of which reads,

God only desires (innama yuridu llahu) to remove defilement (rijs) from you, O Ahl al-Bayt, and to purify you completely.[1]

Muslims disagree as to who belongs to the Ahl al-Bayt and what political privileges or responsibilities they have.[2] Shia Islam limits the Ahl al-Bayt to the Islamic prophet Muhammad, his daughter Fatima, her husband Ali, and their two sons, Hasan and Husayn.[3][4] There are various views in Sunni Islam, though a typical compromise is to include also Muhammad's wives in the Ahl al-Bayt.[5] The verse of purification is regarded by the Shia as evidence of the infallibility of the Ahl al-Bayt.[6]

Rijs

[edit]

The Islamic philosopher Hossein Nasr and his coauthors define spiritual defilement (rijs) as all evil deeds and false beliefs that arise from the 'sickness of the heart', another Quranic expression that appears for instance in verse 9:125. In their view, the verse of purification can thus be interpreted as God’s wanting to remove any incorrect action or belief from the Ahl al-Bayt (lit. 'people of the house') and to bestow upon them infallibility (isma), that is, the innate protection against all false beliefs or evil deeds. They define isma as a God-given consciousness that overrides all other human faculties, so that a person endowed with isma is completely protected from going astray and committing sins.[7]

Shia view

[edit]

The Twelver exegete Shaykh Tusi (d. 1067) notes that the article innama in the verse of purification grammatically limits the verse to the Ahl al-Bayt. He then argues that rijs here cannot be limited to disobedience because God expects obedience from every responsible person (Arabic: مكلف, romanized: mukallaf) and not just the Ahl al-Bayt. The verse must therefore refer to the infallibility of the Ahl al-Bayt, he concludes.[8] The argument of the Shia theologian Sharif al-Murtaza (d. 1044) is similar. He contends that God's desire in the verse of purification cannot be a mere desire because God desires the spiritual purification of every responsible person. Therefore, God's desire in this verse must have been followed by action, that is, the action of purifying the Ahl al-Bayt and ensuring their infallibility.[8] Another argument in this vein is presented by the contemporary Twelver jurist Ja'far Sobhani.[9]

Ahl al-Bayt

[edit]

Inclusion of the Ahl al-Kisa

[edit]
See also: Ahl al-Kisa
Names of the Ahl al-Kisa, inscribed in the shrine of Abbas ibn Ali, located in Karbala, Iraq

The majority of the traditions quoted by the Sunni exegete al-Tabari (d. 923) identify the Ahl al-Bayt with the Ahl al-Kisa, namely, Muhammad, his daughter Fatima, her husband Ali, and their two sons, Hasan and Husayn.[6][10][11] Such reports are also cited in Sahih Muslim, Sunnan al-Tirmidhi, Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal,[12][13] all canonical Sunni collections of hadith, and by some other Sunni authorities, including al-Suyuti (d. 1505), al-Hafiz al-Kabir,[14] al-Hakim al-Nishapuri (d. 1014),[15] and Ibn Kathir (d. 1373).[16]

In possibly the earliest version of the hadith of the kisa,[17] Muhammad's wife Umm Salama relates that he gathered Ali, Fatima, Hasan, and Husayn under his cloak and prayed, "O God, these are my ahl al-bayt and my closest family members; remove defilement from them and purify them completely."[18][2] Some accounts continue that Umm Salama then asked Muhammad, "Am I with thee, O Messenger of God?" but received the negative response, "Thou shalt obtain good. Thou shalt obtain good." Among others, such reports are given in Sunnan al-Tirmidhi, Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal,[19] and by Ibn Kathir, al-Suyuti, and the Shia exegete Muhammad H. Tabatabai (d. 1981).[1] Yet another Sunni version of this hadith appends Umm Salama to the Ahl al-Bayt.[5] In another Sunni version, Muhammad's servant Wathila bint al-Asqa' is also counted in the Ahl al-Bayt.[20]

Elsewhere in Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Muhammad is said to have recited the last passage in the verse of purification every morning when he passed by Fatima's house to remind her household of the morning prayer.[21][22] In his mubahala (lit. 'mutual cursing') with a delegation of Najrani Christians, Muhammad is also believed to have gathered the above four under his cloak and referred to them as his ahl al-bayt, according to Shia and some Sunni sources,[23][11] including Sahih Muslim and Sunan al-Tirmidhi.[24] This makeup of the Ahl al-Bayt is echoed by the Islamicist Laura Veccia Vaglieri (d. 1989),[21] and also reported unanimously in Shia sources.[5] In Shia theology works, the Ahl al-Bayt often also includes the remaining Shia imams.[6] The term is sometimes loosely applied in Shia writings to all descendants of Ali and Fatima.[6][25][26]

Inclusion of Muhammad's wives

[edit]
Verse of purification in a folio of the Quran, dating to the late Safavid period

Perhaps because the earlier injunctions in the verse of purification are addressed at Muhammad's wives,[2] some Sunni authors, such as al-Wahidi (d. 1075), have exclusively interpreted the Ahl al-Bayt as Muhammad's wives.[6][18] Others have noted that the last passage of this verse is grammatically inconsistent with the previous injunctions (masculine plural versus feminine plural pronouns).[27] Thus the Ahl al-Bayt is not or is not limited to Muhammad's wives.[1][2][21] Ibn Kathir, for instance, includes Ali, Fatima, and their two sons in the Ahl al-Bayt, in addition to Muhammad's wives.[6] Indeed, certain Sunni hadiths support the inclusion of Muhammad's wives in the Ahl al-Bayt, including some reports on the authority of Ibn Abbas and Ikrima, two early Muslim figures.[28]

Alternatively, the Islamicist Oliver Leaman proposes that marriage to a prophet does not guarantee inclusion in his ahl al-bayt. He argues that, in verse 11:73,[18] Sara is included in Abraham's ahl al-bayt only after receiving the news of her imminent motherhood to two prophets, Isaac and Jacob. Likewise, Leaman suggests that Moses' mother is counted as a member of ahl al-bayt in verse 28:12, not for being married to Imran, but for being the mother of Moses.[4] Similarly, in their bid for inclusion in the Ahl al-Bayt, the Abbasids argued that women, noble and holy as they may be, could not be considered a source of pedigree (nasab). As the descendants of Muhammad's paternal uncle Abbas, they claimed that he was equal to Muhammad's father after the latter died.[18][29]

Broader interpretations

[edit]

As hinted above, some Sunni authors have broadened its application to include in the Ahl al-Bayt the clan of Muhammad (Banu Hashim),[18][30] the Banu Muttalib,[5] the Abbasids,[1][18][6] and even the Umayyads, who had descended from Hashim's nephew Umayya.[2][6] Indeed, another Sunni version of the Hadith al-Kisa is evidently intended to append the Abbasids to the Ahl al-Bayt.[6] This Abbasid claim was in turn the cornerstone of their bid for legitimacy.[18][2] Similarly, a Sunni version of the hadith of the thaqalayn defines the Ahl al-Bayt as the descendants of Ali and his brothers (Aqil and Jafar), and Muhammad's uncle Abbas.[5][6]

The first two Rashidun caliphs, Abu Bakr and Umar, have also been included in the Ahl al-Bayt in some Sunni reports, as they were both fathers-in-law of Muhammad. Nevertheless, these and the accounts about the inclusion of the Umayyads in the Ahl al-Bayt might have been later reactions to the Abbasid claims to inclusion in the Ahl al-Bayt and their own bid for legitimacy.[2] The term has also been interpreted as the Meccan tribe of Quraysh,[18][2] or the whole Muslim community.[5][2] For instance, the Islamicist Rudi Paret (d. 1983) identifies bayt (lit. 'house') in the verse of purification with the Kaaba, located in the holiest site in Islam. However, his theory has only found few supporters, notably Moshe Sharon, another expert.[18][2][31]

Conclusion

[edit]

A typical Sunni compromise is to define the Ahl al-Bayt as the Ahl al-Kisa (Muhammad, Ali, Fatima, Hasan, Husayn) together with Muhammad's wives,[5] which might also reflect the majority opinion of medieval Sunni exegetes.[32] Among modern Islamicists, this view is shared by Ignác Goldziher (d. 1921) and his coauthors,[6] and mentioned by Sharon,[18] while Wilferd Madelung (d. 2023) also includes the Banu Hashim in the Ahl al-Bayt in view of their blood relation to Muhammad.[28] In contrast, Shia limits the Ahl al-Bayt to Muhammad, Ali, Fatima, Hasan, and Husayn, pointing to authentic traditions in Sunni and Shia sources.[3][4][27] Their view is supported by Veccia Vaglieri and Husain M. Jafri (d. 2019), another expert.[21]

Significance in Shia Islam

[edit]
Verse of purification, inscribed in the shrine of Husayn in Karbala, Iraq

The verse of purification has long been regarded by the Shia as evidence for the infallibility of the Ahl al-Bayt.[6] Ali cited this verse when he introduced Hasan as his successor from his deathbed in 661, according to the Shia-leaning historian al-Ma'sudi (d. 956) in his Muruj.[33] Among others, the Sunni historian al-Baladhuri (d. 892) quotes Hasan in his Ansab as referring to this verse in his inaugural speech as the new caliph,

I am of the family of the prophet (ahl al-bayt) from whom God has removed filth and whom He has purified, whose love He has made obligatory in His Book (Quran) when He said: "Whosoever performs a good act, We shall increase the good in it." Performing a good act is love for us, the family of the prophet.[34]

— Hasan ibn Ali

In Twelver Shia, infallibility (isma) is considered a necessary trait for their imams as the divine guides after the prophet, lest their followers would be led astray.[35] In addition to logical arguments, the textual basis for the infallibility of their imams includes the Quranic verse, "My covenant embraceth not the evildoers."[36] This notion was included in Shia teachings as early as the Shia imam Muhammad al-Baqir (d. c. 732).[37]

See also

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Verse of purification

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Verse of Purification (Arabic: آية التطهير, Āyat at-Taṭhīr), also known as Ayat al-Tathir, constitutes the concluding segment of Quran 33:33 from Surah Al-Ahzab, stating: "Allah only intends to remove from you the impurity [of sin], O people of the [Prophet's] household, and to purify you with [extensive] purification." This declaration addresses the Ahl al-Bayt (People of the House) of Prophet Muhammad, emphasizing divine removal of all forms of ritual and moral impurity to achieve complete sanctity. The verse's context follows directives to the Prophet's wives regarding modesty and devotion, but features a grammatical shift from feminine plural pronouns (addressing women) to masculine plural, signaling a distinct reference to the broader household. In Shia exegesis, it establishes the infallibility ('isma) of Muhammad, his daughter Fatima, son-in-law Ali, and grandsons Hasan and Husayn—core figures excluding the wives—supported by narrations like Hadith al-Kisa' (Tradition of the Cloak). Sunni scholars, drawing on similar hadiths, typically encompass the wives within Ahl al-Bayt while affirming purification as spiritual elevation rather than absolute impeccability, highlighting interpretive divergences rooted in hadith chains and linguistic analysis. These differing views underpin theological debates on authority and purity in Islam, with the verse invoked in discussions of succession and doctrinal purity absent unsubstantiated prophetic exemptions for spousal sin.

Quranic Text

Original Arabic and Standard Translations

The Verse of Purification (Arabic: آية التطهير, ʾĀyatuṱ-Ṯaṯhīr) constitutes the final clause of Quran 33:33, specifically: إِنَّمَا يُرِيدُ اللَّهُ لِيُذْهِبَ عَنْكُمُ الرِّجْسَ أَهْلَ الْبَيْتِ وَيُطَهِّرَكُمْ تَطْهِيرًا. This segment declares Allah's intent to remove rijs (impurity or abomination) from the ahl al-bayt (people of the house) and to purify them with thorough purification (tatheeran). A common transliteration renders it as: Innamā yurīdu Allāhu li-yuḍḥiba ʿankumu ar-rijsa ahl al-bayti wa yuṭahhirakum taṭhīran. Standard English translations of this clause, drawn from widely referenced versions, include:
  • Sahih International: "Allah intends only to remove from you the impurity [of sin], O people of the [Prophet's] household, and to purify you with [extensive] purification."
  • Abdullah Yusuf Ali: "And Allah only wishes to remove all abomination from you, ye members of the Family, and to make you pure as from all stain."
  • Muhammad Marmaduke Pickthall: "Allah (willeth only) to remove from you (all) abomination, People of the Home! and make you pure and spotless."
These renderings reflect interpretive choices for terms like rijs (often as "impurity" or "abomination," denoting moral or spiritual defilement) and tatheeran (emphasizing comprehensive cleansing), though the core phrasing remains uniform across Quranic manuscripts.

Key Terms and Linguistic Nuances

The particle innamā in the verse serves as an asseverative and restrictive adverbial construction in , emphasizing exclusivity by negating any intention beyond the stated purification, akin to "only" or "verily only" in English translations, thereby underscoring divine intent without extraneous motives. The term ar-rijs stems from the triliteral root r-j-s, connoting agitation, filth, or detestable matter, which in Quranic usage extends metaphorically to moral or doctrinal impurities such as , error, or (shirk), with exegetes debating its precise scope but agreeing on its connotation of removable defilement. Ahl al-bayt, literally "people of the house" or "household," derives from bayt (house) and ahl (kin or inhabitants), a phrase employed in pre-Islamic Arabic for close family members deserving protection and honor, though its application here prompts interpretive variance due to contextual embedding. The verb yutahhirakum (to purify you) paired with tatheeran utilizes the maf'ūl muṭlaq (cognate accusative) construction for rhetorical intensification, amplifying the thoroughness of purification as a comprehensive, emphatic process rather than partial cleansing. Grammatically, the verse exhibits a pronominal shift: preceding directives employ feminine imperatives and pronouns (buyūtikunna, tabarrujna) addressing the Prophet's wives, but the purification reverts to masculine accusatives ('ankumu, -kum), a construction permissible in Arabic for generality or abrupt addressee change, signaling a distinct amid the surah's flow.

Historical Context

Revelation During the Prophet's Medinan Period

The Verse of Purification (Quran 33:33) forms part of al-Ahzab, a revealed after the Hijra in 622 CE and following the in 3 AH (625 CE). The surah addresses communal and domestic matters in the growing Muslim society of Medina, including directives to the Prophet's household amid external threats from confederate tribes. Verses 28–34, encompassing the purification verse, were revealed in close temporal proximity to the (also known as the Battle of Khandaq) in 5 AH (March–April 627 CE) and the subsequent siege of the tribe. This occurred during a phase of intensified conflict and internal consolidation for the Medinan community, approximately two to three years after the Prophet's migration from . The preceding verses in the rebuke and outline social reforms, while the purification verse shifts to affirm divine intent toward the (people of the house), emphasizing removal of impurity (rijs) and thorough cleansing (tathiran). Traditional accounts, drawn from early works, place the surah's descent amid the Prophet's household dynamics, including the status of his wives at the time—such as , Hafsa, Saudah, and —prior to later marriages. Scholarly consensus across Sunni exegeses, such as those referenced in Maududi's Tafhim al-Qur'an, ties the verse's context to Medina's defensive struggles, underscoring themes of resilience and divine protection rather than isolated domestic incidents. The Medinan setting reflects the Quran's evolution from Meccan emphases on individual faith to communal legislation, with al-Ahzab containing 73 verses overall, many abrogating prior norms like adoption customs in verse 5. No precise day or month is unanimously recorded for verse 33:33 alone, but its integration within the surah aligns it firmly to 5 AH events.

Associated Events Including the Event of the Cloak

The Event of the Cloak, known as Hadith al-Kisa', recounts an incident in which the Muhammad gathered his daughter Fatimah, her husband Ali ibn Abi Talib, and their sons Hasan and Husayn under a black woolen in the presence of his wife , reciting a for their purification from all impurity, after which Quran 33:33 is said to have been revealed or applied specifically to them. This narration is reported in both Sunni and Shia hadith collections, including via Aisha's chain, where the enters with the draped over his shoulders, calls the four family members beneath it, and declares, "O Allah, these are my , so remove all abomination from them and purify them thoroughly," prompting Umm Salama's inquiry about her inclusion, to which the responds that the divine address pertains only to those under the . A parallel version narrated by herself emphasizes the exclusivity of the purification to the five individuals under the cloak, excluding her despite her proximity, as the Prophet states the verse's promise of purification applies solely to "these" gathered members of his . This event is dated to the Medinan period, likely around 5 AH amid the socio-political challenges following the , when al-Ahzab was revealed, though exact timing varies across reports without consensus on predating or postdating the verse's revelation. The hadith's chains are considered reliable by some scholars across sects, with Sunni evaluators like those referencing al-Bukhari and Muslim's criteria deeming core elements sahih, while Shia traditions classify it as mutawatir due to multiple corroborating narrations from companions like Jabir ibn Abdullah al-Ansari. Associated with this is the broader context of domestic exhortations to the Prophet's wives in preceding verses of Surah al-Ahzab (33:28-32), addressing their conduct amid public criticisms and material choices during wartime austerity, but the abrupt shift in grammatical address from feminine plural ("and abide quietly in your homes" in 33:33a) to masculine plural in the purification clause (33:33b) is linked by narrators to the cloak incident, signaling a distinct divine pronouncement on the Prophet's immediate kin rather than his spouses. No other major events are univocally tied to the verse's revelation in primary sources, though some tafsirs connect it to the Prophet's household dynamics post-Battle of the Trench, emphasizing spiritual elevation amid communal trials. Discrepancies in inclusion—Shia sources restricting to the cloaked five based on the event's details, versus some Sunni views incorporating wives—stem from interpretive variances, but the core historical report of the gathering remains consistent across authenticated chains.

Exegetical Analysis

Grammatical Structure and Shift in Address

The text of Quran 33:33 commences with a series of imperatives addressed to the Prophet's wives in the feminine form, including wa-qarna fī buyūtikunna ("and stay in your houses") and wa-lā tabarrajna ("and do not display [yourselves]"), employing second-person feminine pronouns such as -kunna. This address aligns with the preceding verses (33:28–32), which similarly direct counsel to the wives collectively using feminine morphology. A marked grammatical shift occurs in the purification clause: inna mā yurīdu Allāhu li-yuthhhiba ʿankumu l-rij'sa Ahl al-Bayti wa-yuṭahhirakum taṭhīran, where the pronoun ʿankum ("from you") adopts the masculine plural form, and Ahl al-Bayt ("people of the house") functions as a masculine collective noun in the accusative case, followed by the masculine plural object suffix -kum in yuṭahhirakum ("to purify you"). This transition from feminine plural (-kunna) to masculine plural (-kum) deviates from the sustained feminine address in the surrounding directives, signaling a potential change in the intended recipients, as Arabic grammar typically maintains consistent gender agreement within a continuous address unless a deliberate pivot occurs. Classical exegetes have analyzed this shift as evidence of syntactic independence for the purification segment, treating it as a distinct prophetic address rather than an extension of the wifely injunctions; the absence of connective particles linking it fluidly to the prior feminine commands reinforces this view, with the introductory inna ("indeed") marking a new declarative focus. Some grammarians counter that masculine plurals can encompass mixed or feminine groups in collective contexts, permitting inclusion of the wives under Ahl al-Bayt without contradiction, though this requires overriding the explicit gender alternation observed. The structure's precision—employing rij's ("impurity") as an indefinite noun qualified by divine intent (mā yurīdu Allāhu)—further underscores a targeted purification promise, grammatically isolated from the behavioral admonitions to the wives.

Placement Within Surah al-Ahzab and Surrounding Verses

The Verse of Purification forms the final clause of the 33rd verse in Surah al-Ahzab, the 33rd chapter of the , which consists of 73 verses and was revealed during the Medinan period. This surah addresses themes including the (al-Khandaq) in verses 9–27, regulations on adoption and marriage in verses 35–40, and exhortations against hypocrisy in later sections, but verses 28–34 constitute a distinct focused on the Prophet Muhammad's household. Verses 28–32 precede the purification clause with imperatives directed explicitly at the Prophet's wives (nisa' al-nabi), using feminine plural forms such as qarna fi buyutikunna ("settle in your homes") and aqimna al-salat ("establish "). Verse 28 offers them a choice between worldly detachment and divine favor, while verse 30 warns of doubled punishment for indecency and doubled reward for righteousness due to their elevated status. Verse 32 reinforces modesty, prohibiting display akin to the jahiliyyah (pre-Islamic ignorance) and urging straightforward speech. The purification statement itself—"Indeed, Allah intends only to remove from you the impurity, O people of the [Prophet's] household, and to purify you with [extensive] purification"—employs the masculine plural pronoun ankum and directly invokes ahl al-bayt ("people of the house"), marking a grammatical shift from the surrounding feminine plurals. This clause concludes verse 33, transitioning abruptly from commands to wives. Verse 34 immediately follows, reverting to feminine plural address: "And remember what is recited in your houses of the verses of Allah and wisdom," enjoining the women to internalize divine revelation and affirming Allah's subtlety and omniscience. The encapsulation within this wife-centric passage (28–34) underscores domestic and ethical guidelines for the Prophet's family amid broader surah themes of communal trial and fidelity, though the embedded clause's phrasing has fueled exegetical scrutiny over its scope.

Interpretations

Sunni Perspectives

In Sunni tafsir traditions, the Verse of Purification (Quran 33:33) is interpreted as a directive primarily addressed to the Prophet Muhammad's wives, enjoining them to remain in their homes, avoid ostentatious display akin to pre-Islamic ignorance, establish prayer, give zakah, and obey Allah and the Messenger, with the subsequent clause affirming Allah's intent to remove rijs (impurity or sin) from them as Ahl al-Bayt (People of the House) and purify them thoroughly. This purification is viewed as divine protection and elevation in status for the wives, shielding them from moral failings through faith, obedience, and proximity to the Prophet, rather than implying absolute infallibility from all error or sin, which would contradict reports of their human lapses as documented in authentic hadiths. Classical exegetes like emphasize that the verse's context—spanning Quran 33:28–34—focuses on the wives' unique responsibilities, distinguishing them from other believers while including them within the broader Ahl al-Bayt. Sunni scholars maintain a consensus that the Prophet's wives are explicitly part of the Ahl al-Bayt referenced here, citing the feminine plural imperatives (qarna and tabarragna) that directly target them, followed by the purification promise as an extension of this address rather than a grammatical rupture excluding them. Authorities such as al-Suyuti in al-Durr al-Manthur and Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani affirm this inclusion, arguing that verses like Quran 33:6—designating believing women as "members of the family" (awliya' al-nisa' min ahlihi)—and hadiths where Aisha identifies herself as among the Ahl al-Bayt corroborate the wives' status, countering interpretations that limit it to the Prophet's descendants alone. The masculine shift in ahl al-bayt is explained as a stylistic return to the verse's initiatory address to the Prophet or a generic reference encompassing the household under his leadership, preserving contextual continuity without necessitating exclusion. Theological implications in Sunni thought frame this purification as special divine favor (fadila) granted to the wives for their role in supporting prophethood and exemplifying modesty, evidenced by narrations in Sahih al-Bukhari and Muslim where the Prophet invokes blessings upon them alongside his kin. This view rejects notions of inherited impeccability (ismah) passed solely to progeny, prioritizing the verse's emphasis on active obedience over passive sinlessness, and aligns with broader Sunni doctrines on human accountability even for the most virtuous, as seen in tafsirs by al-Tabari and al-Qurtubi who link rijs removal to removal of hypocrisy, idolatry, or ethical impurity through taqwa (God-consciousness).

Shia Perspectives

In Twelver Shia exegesis, the Verse of Purification (Quran 33:33) is interpreted as a divine affirmation of the absolute purity and infallibility (ismah) of the Ahl al-Bayt, specifically referring to the Prophet Muhammad, Ali ibn Abi Talib, Fatima al-Zahra, Hasan ibn Ali, and Husayn ibn Ali. This purification (tatheeran) encompasses removal of all moral and doctrinal impurity (rijs), including sin, error, and forgetfulness, rendering them divinely protected guides for the Muslim community. Shia scholars emphasize that the verse's wording—"Indeed, Allah intends only to remove impurity from you, O People of the [Prophet's] Household, and purify you with [complete] purification"—indicates an eternal, comprehensive sanctity, distinct from general moral exhortations. The shift in grammatical address within the verse—from feminine plural directives to the Prophet's wives earlier (e.g., "and abide in your houses") to masculine plural for the —demonstrates that the purification clause targets a separate group, excluding the wives from this infallible status. This interpretation is reinforced by the Hadith al-Kisa (Tradition of the Cloak), in which the gathered , , Hasan, and Husayn under his cloak, invoked divine protection, and reportedly received the verse's , as narrated in Shia sources tracing to companions like . The underscores the exclusivity of these five as the purified household, with the declaring, "These are the whose impurity has removed and whom He has purified thoroughly." Shia theologians, such as Sheikh al-Mufid (d. 413 AH/1022 CE), extend this infallibility to the subsequent Imams from this lineage, arguing that the verse's intent (iradah) implies ongoing divine preservation to maintain authoritative religious guidance post-Prophethood. This view positions the as the sole interpreters of the and , immune to deviation, in contrast to broader inclusions proposed elsewhere. Critics within Shia discourse occasionally debate the hadith's chain strength, but its doctrinal centrality persists, as affirmed in classical texts like Al-Kafi by al-Kulayni (d. 329 AH/941 CE).

Other Historical and Modern Views

In Mu'tazili exegesis, the verse is understood to address the Prophet's wives directly, with (d. 1144 CE) in al-Kashshaf asserting that it furnishes explicit evidence of their inclusion within the , emphasizing continuity in the address without a grammatical shift excluding them. This interpretation aligns with rationalist priorities on linguistic coherence, viewing the purification as divine intent to remove moral impurities through adherence to revealed commands rather than implying inherent . Zaydi scholars interpret the verse as conferring exclusive divine purification upon the —comprising the Prophet, , , Hasan, and Husayn—highlighting grammatical emphases like innama (only) to underscore God's specific will for their removal from all rijs (impurity). Unlike Twelver Shia, Zaydis do not extend this to absolute (isma) for subsequent Imams, instead seeing it as affirming superior piety and knowledge enabling rightful leadership, while allowing potential error in non-doctrinal matters; this view supported their doctrine of based on merit among Hasanid descendants as late as the 9th/15th century under rulers like al-Qasim. Sufi commentators, such as Rashid al-Din Maybudi (d. 1126 CE) in Kashf al-Asrar, frame the purification as an inner spiritual cleansing (tazkiyah) from ego-driven filth (rijs), applicable to the Prophet's household as exemplars of divine proximity, extending metaphorically to all seekers on the path of gnosis (ma'rifah). This esoteric reading prioritizes tatheer as ongoing self-purification through remembrance of God (dhikr) and detachment from worldly attachments, rather than literal sinlessness, influencing later orders like the Naqshbandiyya in their emphasis on moral refinement. Modern reformist interpretations, exemplified by Muhammad Rashid Rida (d. 1935 CE) in Tafsir al-Manar, treat the verse as ethical guidance for the Prophet's household—including wives and kin—to achieve purity via obedience to , zakah, and prophetic commands, rejecting sectarian claims of as unsubstantiated by context or . Contemporary academic analyses, such as those in linguistic studies of Quranic , highlight the verse's placement amid directives on and , interpreting yutahhirakum tatheeran as thorough moral exoneration through divine favor, without doctrinal exclusivity, supported by comparative across early manuscripts dated to the 7th-8th centuries CE. These views underscore causal realism in purification as resultant from faithful action, not predestined exemption from human fallibility.

Theological and Doctrinal Implications

Purification Concept and Scope of Claims

The concept of purification in 33:33 centers on tathir, denoting the divine removal of rijs—lexically understood as impurity, abomination, or sin—from the , with the phrase tatheeran mutaqqatan indicating a complete and thorough cleansing. This intent (yureedu ) is presented as 's purposeful act to elevate their status, distinct from general exhortations in the . In theological discourse, rijs encompasses both major and minor sins, as well as potential lapses in judgment, with the verse's emphasis on totality implying not merely forgiveness but proactive protection from such impurities. Twelver Shia scholars interpret this purification as establishing * (infallibility), a comprehensive immunity from intentional and unintentional sins, errors in religious transmission, and moral failings, essential for their role as infallible guides post-Prophethood. This scope extends to the Prophet , Ali ibn Abi Talib, bint , , , and the nine subsequent Imams, arguing that partial purification would undermine the verse's absolute language and the causal necessity for unerring leadership in preserving . Supporting s, such as the Hadith of the Cloak (where the Prophet gathered these five under his cloak during revelation), are cited as specifying the beneficiaries, with * logically inferred from the divine promise to preempt any rijs rather than rectify it after occurrence. Sunni theologians, conversely, limit the scope to a special divine favor purifying the Ahl al-Bayt (often including the Prophet's wives and descendants) from hypocrisy, major sins, or worldly impurities through guidance, repentance, or trials, without conferring prophetic-level infallibility. They contend that yureedu expresses intent rather than eternal actualization, and rijs primarily denotes spiritual defilement addressable via tawbah (repentance), as evidenced by Quranic precedents where pious figures like Adam committed errors yet were purified. Claims of broader 'ismah for non-prophets are viewed as unsubstantiated extrapolation, potentially conflicting with reports of companions' sins and the Sunni emphasis on human accountability over inherent sinlessness. Inter-sectarian debates hinge on causal realism: Shia arguments posit that incomplete purification would causally enable doctrinal errors, eroding religious authority, while Sunni critiques highlight empirical authenticity disputes and the verse's contextual address to the Prophet's household amid directives to his wives, suggesting a non-exclusive, non-perpetual sanctity rather than doctrinal .

Role in Defining Ahl al-Bayt

The Verse of Purification (Qur'an 33:33) constitutes the sole explicit Qur'anic reference to the , establishing their identity through divine intent to remove "al-rijs" (all forms of impurity or abomination) and grant "tatheer" (complete purification), thereby marking them as a privileged subset of the Muhammad's household elevated above ordinary believers. This characterization implies a special spiritual status, with the verse's masculine plural address ("kum" and "yutahhirakum") shifting from the preceding feminine plural directives to the 's wives, indicating a distinct group not encompassed by spousal obligations alone. In Twelver Shia theology, the verse delineates the Ahl al-Bayt as limited to the Prophet, 'Ali ibn Abi Talib, Fatimah bint Muhammad, al-Hasan ibn 'Ali, and al-Husayn ibn 'Ali—known as the Ahl al-Kisa' (People of the Cloak)—with purification signifying infallibility ('ismah) from sin and error, essential for their role as authoritative interpreters of revelation post-Prophethood; this exclusivity is reinforced by hadiths such as those in Sunni collections like Sahih Muslim, where the Prophet specifies these five under his cloak during the verse's revelation around 5-6 AH. Sunni interpretations, drawing from the surah's contextual address to the wives (e.g., verses 28-32 enjoining them to domestic piety), extend to include the Prophet's consorts—such as Khadijah, 'A'ishah, and Umm Salamah—as primary recipients of purification, symbolizing moral and doctrinal cleansing rather than ontological ; descendants like the aforementioned five may be included secondarily, but the verse does not preclude sinlessness claims for wives, as evidenced by narrations of its in 'A'ishah's home. These divergent definitions hinge on hadith evidence for membership, with the verse providing the doctrinal criterion of purification but requiring extra-Qur'anic specification; Shia sources prioritize narrations excluding wives (e.g., the Prophet barring them from under the cloak), while Sunni exegeses like those of al-Tabari integrate spousal inclusion to align with the surah's thematic unity on household conduct, reflecting broader tribal connotations of "ahl" (kin or dependents) in pre-Islamic Arabic. The verse thus anchors debates on Ahl al-Bayt's scope, influencing doctrines of leadership (imamate vs. caliphate) without naming individuals, as its generality invites interpretive reliance on prophetic traditions authenticated variably across sects.

Inter-Sectarian Debates

Arguments on Inclusion of the Prophet's Wives

The principal argument for including the Prophet Muhammad's wives in the Verse of Purification (Quran 33:33) rests on the verse's immediate context within Surah al-Ahzab, where preceding directives—such as "wa qarna fi buyutikunna" (remain in your houses)—employ feminine plural pronouns explicitly addressing the wives (33:33). This is followed without interruption by the purification clause: "innama yurid Allahu li-yudhiba ankumu ar-rijsa ahl al-bayti wa yutahhirakum tatheeran" (Allah only desires to remove impurity from you, O People of the House, and to purify you thoroughly), with the masculine plural "kum" (you) interpreted as encompassing the wives as the primary household members under discussion, rather than signaling a distinct addressee. Classical Sunni exegetes, including Fakhr al-Din al-Razi in his Tafsir al-Kabir, explain the shift to masculine plural as a linguistic convention accommodating both wives and male household elements under "ahl" (people/family), maintaining continuity in the address. Exegetical traditions attribute the verse's revelation (asbab al-nuzul) directly to the wives' circumstances, such as events involving their conduct or status, as reported by early authorities like via his student Ikrimah, who stated it concerned the Prophet's wives, even offering mubahala (mutual cursing invoking divine judgment) to affirm this view. Ismail ibn Kathir in his (vol. 3, p. 532) concurs, noting the verse descended regarding the wives, while Muhammad in Jami al-Bayan (vol. 22, p. 7) cites narrations from Ikrimah linking it explicitly to them. This asbab supports inclusion, as the purification intent aligns with elevating their role as exemplars, per surrounding verses (33:28–34) that frame commands to them within divine favor and accountability. Supporting hadith evidence includes a narration from Zaid ibn Arqam in (hadith 2408), where he affirms the wives as part of , responding to queries about the 's household by including them alongside progeny and kin. Linguistically, in Quranic and denotes the core household, routinely encompassing spouses, as Ibn al-Qayyim argues in Jila al-Afham (pp. 331–333), linking their permanent familial tie to the and exemptions from to this status. Sunni scholars like and further cite scholarly consensus () affirming the wives' place within the purified , viewing exclusionary interpretations as inconsistent with the verse's embedded position amid wife-specific injunctions. These arguments prioritize textual adjacency and revelatory context over claims of grammatical rupture, though they do not uniformly imply the same () extended to the or select kin in broader doctrinal discussions.

Evidence from Hadith Collections and Authenticity Disputes

The al-Kisa, or Tradition of the Cloak, constitutes the principal evidence linking the to the invocation of 33:33, wherein he assembles ibn Abi Talib, bint , al-Hasan ibn , and al-Husayn ibn beneath his cloak and prays: "O , these are the people of my ; so remove impurity from them and purify them completely." This narration appears in Sunni collections, including (hadith 3787 and 3205), transmitted via chains from , the Prophet's wife, who reports the event occurring in her home. Similar variants are recorded in and , with the core incident— the gathering of the five and the supplication mirroring the verse—deemed authentic by Sunni critics such as himself, who classifies it as hasan-sahih (good-authentic), and later scholars like Ibn Taymiyyah, who affirm its reliability in Tirmidhi's compilation. In Shia hadith corpora, such as by Muhammad Baqir al-Majlisi and al-Kafi by , the is expanded with details like a divine voice affirming the purification from and the exclusion of others, including when she attempts to join under the cloak. Shia rijal scholars, applying their science of narrator reliability, regard the hadith as mutawatir (mass-transmitted via multiple independent chains), narrated by over twenty companions including , , and Abu Sa'id al-Khudri, rendering it beyond reasonable doubt in their methodology. These versions emphasize the verse's revelation immediately following the , positioning the five as the exclusive referent of "." Authenticity disputes center less on the foundational event, widely accepted across sects, and more on chain integrity and interpretive extensions. Sunni muhaddithun like Nasir al-Din al-Albani have graded certain detailed variants as weak due to narrators of questionable reliability in prolonged chains, particularly those adding the celestial response, arguing such embellishments lack corroboration in the most rigorous collections like or , which omit the full incident. Shia sources, conversely, critique Sunni reticence to include fuller narrations as selective, noting acceptance of partial reports while rejecting Shia-augmenting elements despite shared early transmitters; however, intra-Shia debates question interpolations in popular recitations, such as those in Mafatih al-Jinan, for potential later additions lacking pristine chains. These variances underscore methodological divergences: Sunnis prioritize isnad (chain) rigor and contextual harmony with verses addressing the wives (33:28–34), viewing purification as moral exemplarity rather than ontological infallibility, while Shias integrate it with broader proofs like al-Thaqalayn for doctrinal exclusivity, though both traditions affirm the hadith's role in elevating the named figures' status without impugning the event's historicity.

Scholarly Reception and Influence

Classical Tafsirs Across Traditions

In classical Sunni exegeses, the Verse of Purification (Quran 33:33) is primarily interpreted as an address to the Prophet Muhammad's wives, emphasizing divine intent to remove moral and spiritual impurities such as or doubt from them, while enjoining and obedience. Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari (d. 310 AH/923 CE), in his comprehensive Jami' al-Bayan, compiles multiple narrations linking the verse's commands to "stay in your houses" and establish prayer to the wives, with purification signifying Allah's removal of rijs (abomination or ) from the Prophet's , including the wives as central figures; he references reports from companions like attributing the revelation to their elevated status amid worldly trials. (d. 606 AH/1209 CE), in Mafatih , addresses the grammatical shift from feminine plural pronouns (addressing wives) to masculine plural in the purification clause, proposing it as a rhetorical continuation or inclusive reference to the broader , but ultimately affirms the wives' inclusion, interpreting purification as from ethical lapses and elevation in through adherence to divine commands. Ismail ibn Kathir (d. 774 AH/1373 CE), synthesizing earlier sources in Tafsir al-Quran al-Azim, explicitly states the verse targets the Prophet's wives, citing Ibn Abbas and others to argue that Allah's wish to "remove impurity" applies to them as Ahl al-Bayt, purifying them from sins and worldly vanities; he contrasts this with broader family but prioritizes contextual continuity from verses 28–34, which reprimand and guide the wives specifically, rejecting exclusive limitation to progeny without wives. These interpretations rely on the surah's narrative flow and hadiths emphasizing the wives' role, though al-Tabari notes variant reports extending purification to the Prophet's descendants, without endorsing exclusivity. In contrast, classical Shia tafsirs emphasize a doctrinal separation, attributing the purification clause to the Prophet, , Fatima, Hasan, and Husayn exclusively, based on the pronoun shift and hadiths like the Event of the Cloak, positing (infallibility) from all sin and error. Ali ibn Ibrahim al-Qummi (d. ca. 307 AH/919 CE), in Tafsir al-Qummi, one of the earliest extant Shia commentaries, links the verse to divine removal of every impurity from the as the Prophet's purified lineage, excluding wives due to contextual discontinuity and reports tracing to the five under the Prophet's mantle. Al-Fadl ibn al-Hasan al-Tabarsi (d. 548 AH/1153 CE), in Majma' al-Bayan, reinforces this by analyzing the abrupt masculine address as indicating a distinct for the Imams' forebearers, interpreting tathir (purification) as comprehensive immunity from moral, doctrinal, and interpretive flaws, drawing on Shia corpora to argue wives' inclusion contradicts the verse's intent for absolute sanctity. These divergent exegeses reflect underlying selections and hermeneutical priorities: Sunni scholars favor syntactic and surah-contextual unity, viewing purification as ethical guidance amid the wives' trials (e.g., post-Battle of the revelations), while Shia prioritize narrations from the Prophet's progeny and grammatical indicators for doctrinal claims, often deeming opposing hadiths weaker due to chain disruptions in Sunni collections. Later compilations like Muhammad Baqir al-Majlisi's (d. 1110 AH/1699 CE) Bihar al-Anwar aggregate these Shia views, but classical works establish the core sectarian polarity without resolving authenticity disputes empirically.

Contemporary Discussions and Critiques

In recent scholarly analyses, Shia interpreters continue to defend the exclusivity of the Verse of Purification (Qur'an 33:33) to the Prophet Muhammad, Ali ibn Abi Talib, Fatima al-Zahra, al-Hasan, and al-Husayn, citing a syntactical shift from feminine plural pronouns addressing the wives earlier in the surah to masculine plural for Ahl al-Bayt, alongside the emphatic particle innama signaling a distinct divine intent for complete purification (tathir) from all impurity (rijs), implying infallibility. This view, elaborated in modern English-language exegeses, rejects inclusion of the wives due to contextual separation and theological implications that would contradict reports of their moral lapses elsewhere in Islamic tradition. Sunni responses in contemporary polemics critique this exclusion as grammatically forced, arguing the verse's placement within directives to the Prophet's household maintains continuity, with Ahl al-Bayt encompassing the wives as the primary addressees, and purification denoting specific moral or ritual cleansing rather than absolute impeccability, as evidenced by the surah's admonitory tone toward women. Linguistic critiques highlight that the pronoun change reflects standard Qur'anic style without necessitating a revelatory break, and historical narrations like those from Aisha describing her inclusion under the cloak event support broader application, challenging Shia doctrinal elevation to infallibility for political succession claims. Academic analyses underscore persistent interpretive divergences, with Shia emphasizing literal textual independence and Sunni prioritizing surah-wide coherence, including the verse amid rules for the wives' conduct; such studies from the note how tone shifts from reproof to praise reinforce Shia separation but fail to override contextual embedding for Sunnis. Critiques of claims, advanced in inter-sectarian debates, contend that rijs removal aligns with prophetic guidance for all believers, not unique sinlessness, as no explicit Qur'anic endorsement extends to doctrinal immunity from error, potentially inflating hadith-dependent expansions in modern Shia . These discussions persist in online forums and publications, reflecting unresolved tensions amid ecumenical efforts, though peer-reviewed works favor contextual over selective grammatical arguments.

References

  1. https://quran.com/en/33:33/tafsirs/en-tafsir-maarif-ul-quran
  2. https://al-islam.org/brief-commentary-hadeeth-al-kisaa-tradition-cloak-jerrmein-abu-shahba/revelation-purification-verse
  3. https://ijmmu.com/index.php/ijmmu/article/view/1256
  4. https://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=33&verse=33
  5. https://islam.redzambala.com/quran/al-tathir-verse.html
  6. https://legacy.quran.com/33/33
  7. https://quranyusufali.com/33/
  8. http://en.noblequran.org/quran/surah-al-ahzab/ayat-33/
  9. https://myislam.org/surah-ahzab/ayat-33/
  10. https://quranx.com/tafsirs/33.33
  11. https://iqraonline.net/an-in-depth-analysis-of-the-verse-of-tathir-who-are-the-ahl-al-bayt-part-1/
  12. https://www.ahlulsunnah.net/articles/ayat-tathir-and-infallibility
  13. https://al-islam.org/enlightening-commentary-light-holy-quran-vol-14/section-4-ahlul-bayt-divinely-made-pure
  14. https://mahajjah.com/speculation-3-the-purport-of-verse-of-tathir/
  15. https://al-islam.org/ayat-ut-tatheer-whom-does-purification-verse-refer-hatem-abu-shahba/grammatical-alteration
  16. http://www.twelvershia.net/2013/05/03/ayat-al-tatheer/
  17. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=33&verse=31&to=34
  18. https://islamicstudies.info/quran/dawat.php?sura=33&verse=28&to=30
  19. https://www.al-islam.org/fatimah-al-zahra-cradle-grave-sayyid-muhammad-kadhim-al-qazwini/chapter-6-hadith-al-kisa
  20. https://islamquest.net/en/archive/fa10521
  21. https://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/234925651-sunni-view-of-hadith-al-kisa-which-is-hadith-of-the-cloak/
  22. https://rahyafteha.ir/en/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Hadith-al-Kisa-The-Narration-of-the-Cloak.pdf
  23. https://www.duas.org/mobile/hadith-kisa.html
  24. https://en.rafed.net/article/ayat-ut-tatheer-to-whom-does-the-purification-verse-refer-to
  25. https://islamicorigins.com/the-hadith-of-the-cloak/
  26. https://corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=%2833:33:3%29
  27. https://al-islam.org/discourse-ayat-al-tatheer-mansour-leghaei/discourse-ayat-al-tatheer-verse-purification
  28. https://youpuncturedtheark.wordpress.com/2010/10/07/ahlahlebayt-a-collective-noun-and-its-usage/
  29. https://iqraonline.net/an-in-depth-analysis-of-the-verse-of-tathir-who-are-the-ahl-al-bayt-part-2/
  30. https://quran.com/en/al-ahzab
  31. https://islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=33
  32. https://quran.com/en/33:28/tafsirs/en-tafsir-maarif-ul-quran
  33. https://islamicstudies.info/towards.php?sura=33&verse=28&to=34
  34. https://quran.com/en/33:34/tafsirs/en-tafsir-maarif-ul-quran
  35. https://al-islam.org/ayat-ut-tatheer-whom-does-purification-verse-refer-hatem-abu-shahba/purification-verse-surat-al
  36. https://surahquran.com/tafsir-english-aya-33-sora-33.html
  37. https://quranmazid.com/33:33/tafsirs/en-ibn-kathir
  38. https://youpuncturedtheark.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/consensus-among-ahlesunnah-scholars-that-wives-of-prophetsaw-are-included-in-ahlebayt-mentioned-in-3333/
  39. https://al-islam.org/shiite-encyclopedia/sunni-feedback-issues-infallibility-ahlul-bayt
  40. https://al-islam.org/fatimah-al-zahra-cradle-grave-sayyid-muhammad-kadhim-al-qazwini/chapter-6-hadith-al-kisa
  41. https://ijhssm.org/issue_dcp/QUR%2520ANIC%2520Exegesis%2C%2520Sources%2520and%2520Methodology%2520in%2520ZAMAKHSHARI%2520S%2520AL%2520KASHSHAAF%2520%2520TAFSIR.pdf
  42. https://en.wikishia.net/view/Al-Tathir_Verse
  43. https://en.osmannuritopbas.com/the-self-nafs-and-its-purification-tazkiya.html
  44. https://al-islam.org/shiite-encyclopedia/who-are-ahlul-bayt-part-1
  45. https://al-islam.org/imamah-and-khilafah-murtadha-mutahhari/imamah-quran
  46. https://youpuncturedtheark.wordpress.com/2010/11/22/does-verse-of-tatheer3333-makes-anyone-infallible/
  47. https://islamcompass.com/a-scholarly-refutation-of-the-shia-twelver-claims-of-infallibility-and-scriptural-misquotations/
  48. https://hedayatcentre.org/3833/ahl-al-bayt-a/
  49. https://al-islam.org/verse-purification-light-quran-hadith-sayyid-murtadha-al-askari/verse-purification-sunni-sources
  50. https://www.jat-journal.ir/article_179685_4644bba00ccfd717219f4a1f0d720778.pdf
  51. https://simerg.com/literary-readings/literary-reading-an-understanding-of-the-term-ahl-al-bayt-from-the-holy-quran-and-hadith/
  52. https://www.shiaquest.net/miscellaneous/new-muslims-mustabserin/245-articles/ahlulbayt/ahlulbayt-s-relatives/6962-the-concept-of-ahlul-bayt-tribal-or-islamic.html
  53. https://www.academia.edu/24713767/Who_are_Ahl_e_Bayt_People_of_the_household_
  54. https://al-islam.org/role-ahl-al-bayt-building-virtuous-community-book-one-goals-and-characteristics-sayyid-muhammad-2
  55. https://mahajjah.com/chapter-one-who-are-the-ahlul-bayt-and-the-sahabah/
  56. https://sunnah.com/tirmidhi:3787
  57. https://sunnah.com/tirmidhi:3205
  58. https://rightlyguidedteacher.com/2021/10/18/hadith-al-kisa-a-fabricated-fake-or-authentic/
  59. https://islamistruth.wordpress.com/2014/04/02/is-hadith-al-kisa-cloak-authentic-in-shia-books/
  60. https://shiismandislamichistory.wordpress.com/2021/01/11/hadith-e-kisas-vexed-history-transmission-and-interpolation-into-mafatih-al-jinan/
  61. https://islamweb.net/en/fatwa/12125/the-purity-of-the-household-of-the-prophet
  62. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2461818810704261&id=1657985954420888&set=a.1790021267884022
  63. https://www.reddit.com/r/MuslimLounge/comments/1lqz1hy/tafsir_of_3333/
  64. https://recitequran.com/tafsir/en.ibn-kathir/33:33
  65. https://hubeali.com/books/English-Books/TafseerQummi/TafsirQummi-Vol3.pdf
  66. https://www.academia.edu/76871116/An_In_Depth_Analysis_of_the_%C4%80yah_of_Ta%E1%B9%ADh%C4%ABr_Who_are_the_Ahl_al_Bayt
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.