Hubbry Logo
Werling v. SandyWerling v. SandyMain
Open search
Werling v. Sandy
Community hub
Werling v. Sandy
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Werling v. Sandy
from Wikipedia

Werling v. Sandy
CourtSupreme Court of Ohio
Full case name Werling, ADMX., Appellant, v. Sandy et al., Appellees.
DecidedApril 24, 1985 (1985-04-24)
Citation17 Ohio St. 3d 45
Court membership
Judges sittingFrank D. Celebrezze, Robert E. Holmes, Clifford F. Brown, A. William Sweeney, Andrew Douglas, J. Craig Wright, Donald R. Ford[a]
Case opinions
Decision byHolmes
ConcurrenceCelebrezze, Sweeney, Ford, C. Brown, Wright, Douglas

Werling v. Sandy, 17 Ohio St. 3d 45 (1985), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of Ohio that first recognized the cause of action for the wrongful death of a fetus in that state.[1]

Decision

[edit]

The parents of a stillborn fetus sued for wrongful death, and the trial court dismissed the complaint on the grounds that there was no such cause of action. The Supreme Court of Ohio held that a cause of action would lie. The court recognized several statutory indicators that a stillborn fetus might properly be considered a decedent, including clauses in the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act and the rule against perpetuities. The court also recognized the arbitrariness of allowing recovery for wrongful death caused by negligently inflicted prenatal injuries in the case where the death occurs shortly after a live birth and disallowing recovering when the death occurred shortly before birth. The court held that the wrongful death action would only lie for a viable fetus that was carried full term.[2]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.