Hubbry Logo
Wild silkWild silkMain
Open search
Wild silk
Community hub
Wild silk
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Wild silk
Wild silk
Wild silk
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Muga silkworms on a som tree

Wild silks have been known and used in many countries from early times, although the scale of production is far smaller than that from cultivated silkworms. Silk cocoons and nests often resemble paper or cloth, and their use has arisen independently in many societies.[1]

Background

[edit]

Silk taken from various species has been used since ancient times, either in its natural state or after some form of preparation. Spider webs were used as a wound dressing in ancient Greece and Rome,[2] and as a base for painting from the 16th century.[3] Caterpillar nests were used to make containers and fabric in the Aztec Empire.[1][4]

To make a woven fabric, silk threads must first be either carded and spun, or extracted as a single intact thread. Commercially reared silkworms of the species Bombyx mori (Linnaeus, 1758) are normally killed before the pupae emerge, either by pricking them with a needle or dipping the cocoons into boiling water, thus allowing the whole cocoon to be unravelled as one continuous thread. This allows a much finer cloth to be woven from the silk.

There are more than 500 species of wild silkworms in the world, although only a few (nearly all listed below) are used to produce cloth. They usually produce a tougher and rougher silk than that from domesticated B. mori. Wild silks are usually harvested after the moths have left the cocoons, cutting the threads in the process, so that there is not one long thread, as with domesticated silkworms.

Wild silks are more difficult to bleach and dye than silk from Bombyx mori, but most have naturally attractive colours, particularly the rich golden sheen of the silk produced by the muga silkworm from Assam, often known as Assam silk.

The cocoon shells of wild silk moths are toughened or stabilized either by tanning (cross-linking) or by mineral reinforcements (e.g. calcium oxalate).[5] In 2011, a new method was developed for demineralizing silk, which can remove the mineral reinforcements present in wild silks and enables wet reeling like the commercial silkworm.[6][7]

Wild silk industry in India

[edit]

Wild silks are often referred to in India as 'Vanya' silks:

The term 'Vanya' is of Sanskrit origin, meaning untamed, wild, or forest-based. Muga, Tasar, and Eri silkworms are not fully tamed and the world calls the silks they produce as 'wild silks'.[8]

India produces four kinds of silk: mulberry, tasar, muga and eri. The silkworm Bombyx mori is fed on mulberry leaves cultivated in plantations. Silkworms are also found wild on forest trees, e.g Antheraea paphia which produces the tasar silk (Tussah). Antheraea paphia feeds on several trees such as Anogeissus latifolia, Terminalia tomentosa, T. arjuna (Terminalia arjuna), Lagerstroemia parviflora and Madhuca indica. Antheraea assamensis produces muga silk, and another wild silkworm (Samia ricini) produces eri silk. The estimated annual production of tasar silk is 130 tonnes. Production of other types of silk exceeds 10 000 tonnes (Gupta 1994).[9]

In 2015, the complete sequence and the protein structure of Muga Silk Fibroin was analyzed and published.[10]

The eri silk worm from India feeds on the leaves of the castor plant. It is the only completely domesticated silkworm other than Bombyx mori. The silk is extremely durable, but cannot be easily reeled off the cocoon and is thus spun like cotton or wool.[11]

Wild silk industry in China

[edit]

Some of the best quality wild silk is produced by silkworms in Henan. This is the only type of wild silk that can be easily dyed.[12][unreliable source?]

History

[edit]

Central Asia

[edit]

Wild silk threads have been found and identified from two Indus River sites, Harappa and Chanhu-daro, dating to c. 2450–2000 BCE. This is roughly the same period as the earliest evidence of silk use in China, which is generally thought to have had the oldest silk industry in the world. The specimens of threads from Harappa appear on scanning electron microscope analysis to be from two different species of silk moth, Antheraea paphia and A. assamensis, while the silk from Chanhu-daro may be from a Philosamia species (eri silk), and this silk appears to have been reeled.[13]

China

[edit]

Wild silks were in use in China from early times. Moreover, the Chinese were aware of their use in the Roman Empire and apparently imported goods made from them by the time of the Later Han Dynasty in the 1st to 3rd centuries CE.[14][15]

Greece and the Middle East

[edit]

There are significant indications in the literature that wild silks were in use in Persia and in Greece by the late 5th century BCE, apparently referred to as "Amorgina" or "Amorgian garments" in Greece.[16] Pliny the Elder, in the 1st century CE, obviously had some knowledge of how wild silkworms' cocoons were produced and utilised on the island of Kos for coa vestis, even though his account included some fanciful ideas.[vague][17]

Central America

[edit]

Wild silk was used and traded by the Aztecs, Mixtecs and Zapotecs at the time of Moctezuma (early 16th century CE).[18][4] This silk came from the social caterpillars Euchiera socialis and Eutachyptera psidii, which produce communal silk nests that frequently reach 50 cm (20 inches) in length.[1] The nests were cut open and pasted together to make a paper-like fabric.

Whole nests have also been use as purses and containers for liquid, and sections of nest silk have served as bandages and as a base for painting.

Silk fibres from the same species have been extracted and spun to make sashes. This practice was recorded in Oaxaca in 1986, but had ceased by 1997. It is uncertain when the wild fibres were first used in this way; one hypothesis is that the techniques were learned from 16th-century colonists, who taught local people to grow imported Bombyx, and later adapted to the local wild silks.[19]

List of wild silk moths and their silk

[edit]
  • Antheraea assamensis (Helfer, 1837) – from Assam. Its silk has a beautiful glossy golden hue which improves with age and washing. It is never bleached or dyed and is stain resistant. The silk was reserved for the exclusive use of royal families in Assam for 600 years.[20][21] In 2015, the Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Hyderabad, India, discovered the molecular characters of muga silk fibroin which are responsible for the golden luster and tensile strength.[10]
  • Antheraea paphia (Linnaeus, 1758) – the "tasar" silkworm.[22]
  • Antheraea pernyi (Guénerin-Méneville, 1855) – the Chinese tussah moth. The colour and quality of the silk depends on the climate and soil.[20]
  • Antheraea yamamai (Guénerin-Méneville, 1861) – the tensan (天蚕) silk moth. The tensan silk moth has been cultivated in Japan for more than 1,000 years. It produces a naturally white silk but does not dye well, though it is very strong and elastic. It is now very rare and expensive.[20]
  • Anaphe – from Nigeria. Caterpillars live on tamarind trees and colonies of several hundred spin communal cocoons. The cocoon's outer layers are beige, while inner layers enclosing each individual are white. Cocoons are boiled in water and wood ash to remove the gum binding filaments together and washed clean. When spun and woven the resulting cloth is coarse, and lacks the sheen of commercial silk. [23]
  • Bombyx mandarina (Moore) – Possibly a wild form of B. mori.
  • Bombyx sinensis – from China. B. sinensis produces prolific but small cocoons.[20]
  • Borocera cajani – Malagasy silk worm[24][25]
  • Cricula trifenestrata – from India to the Philippines, Sulawesi, Java, and Sri Lanka.
  • Eucheira socialis – the Madrone butterfly from central America. It produces large silken nests used by indigenous peoples.
  • Eutachyptera psidii – from central America (also known as Gloveria psidii).[26] It produces nests that have been used in a similar way to those of Euchiera socialis.[4][19]
  • Gonometa postica Walker – from the Kalahari region.[27]
  • Gonometa rufobrunnea Aurivillius. G. rufobrunnea feeds on the mopane tree in southern Africa.
  • Pachypasa otus – around the Western Mediterranean. The probable source for Roman coa vestis.[28]
  • Samia cynthia (Drury, 1773) – the ailanthus silkmoth, a somewhat domesticated silkworm from China. Introduced into North America.[20] The eri silkmoth from Assam is a subspecies of this moth (S. cynthia ricini). It produces a white silk which resembles wool mixed with cotton, but feels like silk.[21]

Footnotes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Wild silk

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Wild silk is a protein produced by undomesticated silkmoths, such as species in the genera and Samia, which spin cocoons in natural or semi-wild environments, distinguishing it from the finer mulberry silk derived from the domesticated silkworm . These silks are harvested primarily after the moths emerge, yielding coarser, more robust fibers with coloration and textured surfaces, often featuring a flat or irregular cross-section due to their porous structure. The most commercially significant types of wild silk include from Samia ricini, from Antheraea assamensis, tasar silk from Antheraea mylitta, and tussah silk from , with major production centered in and , where annual outputs range from hundreds to thousands of tonnes depending on the variety. Unlike mulberry silk, wild silks exhibit greater elongation (typically 20-26%) and tenacity (around 3.7-4.5 g/d), along with higher compressive elasticity and resistance to chemicals, though they have lower cohesion and affinity, necessitating specialized like enzymatic degumming to remove sericin. Their densities vary slightly (1.28-1.35 g/cm³), and they possess inherent properties such as antibacterial and thermal buffering effects, making them suitable for diverse applications. Production of wild silk supports rural economies in forested regions, involving collection from host plants like or castor, and has seen innovations in extraction methods, such as ultrasound-assisted degumming, to enhance efficiency and while preserving the fiber's unique robustness from higher content in the . Beyond traditional textiles like garments and , wild silks are increasingly utilized in biomedical fields, including scaffolds and sutures, due to their and mechanical strength. African wild silks, such as those from Anaphe panda, further exemplify regional diversity, with crescent-shaped fibers offering breaking strains around 15% and moisture regain of 9%.

Overview

Definition

Wild silk is a natural protein fiber produced by the larvae of wild silkmoths, which are non-domesticated species primarily belonging to the family and occasionally other families such as Lasiocampidae or . These larvae spin cocoons in their natural forest or wild habitats, and the silk is harvested directly from these cocoons without controlled rearing or , resulting in a more irregular and textured fiber compared to domesticated varieties. Produced by over 500 of wild silkmoths distributed worldwide across diverse ecologies, wild silk originates from untamed environments where the moths feed on a variety of host rather than a single cultivated source. However, only fewer than 10 are commercially significant due to factors like cocoon yield and fiber quality, with major examples including Antheraea mylitta (tasar), Antheraea assamensis (muga), Samia ricini (eri), and (tussah). This contrasts sharply with cultivated mulberry silk, which is exclusively produced by the domesticated silkworm under intensive , yielding smoother and more uniform threads. In Indian contexts, wild silks are termed "vanya silk," derived from the word vanya meaning untamed, wild, or forest-based, emphasizing their reliance on natural, non-interventionist collection from ecosystems. The prominent tussah variety, in particular, gets its name from the tasar, rooted in the tasara (possibly alluding to the shuttle-like form of the cocoon), highlighting regional linguistic influences on silk .

Characteristics and Properties

Wild silk fibers are characterized by their coarser and more uneven structure compared to cultivated mulberry silk, with diameters typically ranging from 20 to 50 microns, in contrast to the finer 10 to 15 microns of mulberry silk filaments. This irregularity arises from the natural spinning process of wild silkmoths, resulting in fibers that exhibit a natural sheen but with a textured, wavy appearance rather than the smooth uniformity of cultivated varieties. In terms of mechanical performance, wild silk demonstrates higher tensile strength in certain types, reaching up to 4.5 g/denier for species like tasar and muga, and generally shows greater elasticity with elongation at break around 20-26%, making it more flexible than mulberry silk's 15-20% elongation. Chemically, wild silk is composed primarily of (70-80%) as the core structural protein and sericin (20-30%) as the outer gum-like coating, similar to cultivated silk but with variations in profiles influenced by the silkmoth . Natural pigments embedded in the impart inherent colors such as golden yellow in , copperish-brown in tasar, and creamish-white in eri, eliminating the need for artificial in many cases. These fibers are pH neutral, biodegradable under natural conditions, and exhibit resistance to microbial degradation due to their . Aesthetically, the irregular texture of wild silk lends a rustic, nubby appearance ideal for heavyweight fabrics, while functionally, it offers enhanced suitable for applications owing to its coarseness and strength. However, the presence of sericin residue reduces affinity compared to degummed cultivated silk, often requiring pre-treatment for even coloration. Wild silk is , resisting dust mites and allergens, and possesses good moisture absorption capacity, regaining up to 10-11% of its weight in moisture, which contributes to its .
PropertyWild SilkCultivated (Mulberry) Silk
Fiber Diameter (μm)20-5010-15
Breaking Strength (g/denier)3.5-4.54-5
Elongation at Break (%)20-2615-20
Dye AffinityLower (due to sericin and texture)Higher (smooth, degummed surface)

Biology of Wild Silkmoths

Life Cycle and Habitat

Wild silkmoths, belonging to genera such as Antheraea and Samia, undergo a complete metamorphosis with four distinct life cycle stages: egg, larva, pupa, and adult. The cycle varies by species and environmental conditions but typically spans 50-120 days. Eggs are laid in clusters of 100-500 on host plant leaves, hatching in 7-20 days depending on temperature and season; for instance, Antheraea mylitta (tasar silkmoth) eggs hatch in 9-10 days during summer or 15-20 days in winter. The larval stage, lasting 4-6 weeks, involves 4-5 molts as the feeds voraciously on host foliage to accumulate for silk production. Larvae of Antheraea assamensis (muga silkmoth) complete this phase in 30-35 days across five instars, exhibiting greenish-blue coloration, while Samia ricini (eri silkmoth) larvae develop over 20-32 days on castor leaves, showing yellow hues. Polyphagous feeding allows larvae to consume multiple , enhancing survival in variable conditions. Upon maturity, larvae spin silk cocoons during pupation, which lasts 2-3 weeks; pupae of Antheraea mylitta remain encased for 20-25 days, often entering to endure seasonal dry periods. Adult moths emerge after eclosion, lacking functional mouthparts and surviving 3-10 days solely for mating and oviposition; male Antheraea mylitta live 8-10 days, females 5-6 days. These moths inhabit tropical and subtropical forests and woodlands, primarily in , with extensions to parts of and the for related species. Antheraea mylitta thrives in dry deciduous forests of central and eastern (e.g., , ), while Antheraea assamensis is endemic to northeastern India's region, and Samia ricini occurs in subtropical areas of , , and . Key host plants include and Terminalia species for tasar (Antheraea mylitta), som (Persea bombycina) and soalu (Litsea monopetala) for muga (Antheraea assamensis), and castor (Ricinus communis) for eri (Samia ricini). In non-commercial wild rearing, cocoons vary in size, yielding 0.5-1.5 grams of silk each due to natural environmental fluctuations.

Step-by-Step Life Cycle for Key Species

  • Tasar (Antheraea mylitta): Egg (9-20 days) → Larva (30-60 days, 4 molts on Terminalia spp.) → Pupa (20-25 days in stalked cocoon) → Adult (5-10 days). Total: ~60-100 days, bivoltine.
  • Muga (Antheraea assamensis): Egg (~8 days) → Larva (30-35 days, 4 molts on som/soalu) → Pupa (in golden cocoon) → Adult (short-lived). Total: 50 days (summer), 120 days (winter), multivoltine.
  • Eri (Samia ricini): Egg (8-20 days) → Larva (20-32 days, 4 molts on castor) → Pupa (15-37 days in open cocoon) → Adult (~10 days). Total: ~50-60 days, multivoltine (up to 6 cycles/year).

Silk Production Mechanism

Wild silkmoth larvae produce silk through paired, tubular silk glands that extend along the body and are divided into three main regions: the posterior silk gland (PSG) for fibroin synthesis, the middle silk gland (MSG) for sericin production, and the anterior silk gland (ASG) serving as a spinning duct. In species such as and Antheraea assama, these glands are uniformly curved without the pronounced regional swellings seen in domesticated silkworms, reflecting adaptations to wild environments. , the primary structural protein, is synthesized as a viscous liquid dope in the PSG cells, while sericin, a hydrophilic gum-like protein, is produced in the MSG to bind and protect the fibroin fibers. The silk extrusion process begins in the final larval , where the liquid from the PSG flows into the ASG and is expelled through the as two fine monofilaments. These solidify rapidly upon exposure to air due to shear forces during spinning, which align the protein chains, and are immediately coated with sericin from the MSG, forming a composite thread. In wild silkmoths, this mechanism results in robust, often elliptical fibers with poly-alanine repeats that enhance tensile strength compared to the glycine-alanine motifs in cultivated silk. The biochemical synthesis of relies on dominant like (approximately 44.5%) and (30.1%) in such as A. assama, incorporated via transcription of heavy-chain fibroin genes in the PSG; gelation is facilitated by pH shifts from acidic gland conditions to neutral external environments, aided by enzymatic cross-linking. Cocoon formation occurs over 2-3 days as the spins 200-900 meters of continuous thread, creating an irregular, often single-layered protective shell unlike the uniform, multi-layered cocoons of domesticated . This process incorporates air pockets and voids within the structure, providing by trapping disordered air and reducing convective loss, as observed in A. pernyi cocoons. The energy investment is substantial, with the silk glands expanding to comprise up to 20-35% more cellular mass than in related , diverting significant larval resources toward protein synthesis and spinning. Unique to wild silkmoths, silk yield varies due to heterogeneous diets of leaves from diverse host plants, leading to fluctuations in activity and thread quality without the from . This results in diverse fiber microstructures, including heterogeneous sericin expression and variable poly-alanine block lengths, contributing to the coloration and resilience of wild silk.

History

Ancient Origins in Asia

The earliest archaeological evidence of wild silk utilization in Asia emerges from the Indus Valley civilization, dating to approximately 2450–2000 BCE, where silk fibers extracted from wild silkmoths were identified in artifacts from sites such as and Chanhu-daro in present-day . These findings, analyzed through and , indicate the use of indigenous wild species like those in the genus , marking one of the oldest instances of silk processing outside and highlighting early experimentation with non-domesticated silkmoths in South-Central Asia. In , during the of the 4th millennium BCE, carbonized silk fabric residues were discovered at the Wanggou site in Province, representing some of the earliest evidence in and likely derived from wild silkmoths foraging on local flora. This period reflects initial human interaction with wild silk producers, with a transition toward of mulberry silk by the 3rd millennium BCE. Prior to the widespread domestication of around 3000 BCE, wild silkmoths contributed to early silk yields, as inferred from archaeological records. By the late BCE, silk held economic significance in , as evidenced by references in oracle bones around 1200 BCE, which document silk as a tribute item and ritual material, alongside emerging mulberry varieties. These inscriptions underscore silk's role in proto-trade networks predating the formalized , facilitating exchanges across through nomadic intermediaries. In the , later Vedic texts allude to "kosa" silk—derived from wild tussar moths—used in garments and offerings, reflecting its integration into early Indo-Aryan society. Tribal communities in regions like and maintain traditions of harvesting wild silk without killing the moths, allowing emergence to align with ahimsa-like principles of non-violence, a practice rooted in indigenous customs and employed in rituals such as weaving sacred cloths for festivals and ceremonies. This ethical approach, documented in ethnographic studies of Santhal and Munda groups, preserves in forest ecosystems. The overall shift from purely wild harvesting to semi-domestication during the 3rd millennium BCE across enabled scalable production while retaining wild species' resilience, laying foundational techniques for later traditions.

Global Spread and Regional Traditions

The knowledge and use of wild silk began to disseminate beyond its Asian origins through ancient trade networks, reaching the Mediterranean and by the classical period. In the 5th century BCE, the Greek historian referenced the Seres—likely referring to peoples in —as producing a fine, wool-like material from trees, which scholars interpret as an early description of wild silk fibers obtained via trade routes. By the 4th century BCE, production of , possibly including local wild varieties, emerged on the Aegean island of , where weavers created lightweight fabrics known as Coan silk. Persian intermediaries played a key role in this diffusion, controlling overland trade from and supplying raw wild silk, including tussah varieties, to Byzantine workshops by the 6th century CE, where it was woven into luxurious garments and ecclesiastical vestments that symbolized imperial prestige. In the Ottoman Empire, which inherited Byzantine silk traditions, imports of tussah wild silk from India and China fueled a vibrant textile industry from the 15th century onward, with Bursa emerging as a major center for blending these coarse, golden fibers into durable velvets and brocades used in court attire and export markets. These imports not only enriched Ottoman craftsmanship but also facilitated cultural exchanges, as wild silk textiles appeared in diplomatic gifts and Sufi rituals, underscoring their role in pre-19th-century Eurasian economies where they contributed to trade balances rivaling spices and metals. In , traditions centered on Borocera species persisted in and , where communities in the highlands gathered wild cocoons from endemic silkmoths like Borocera cajani to weave lambahoany cloths for shrouds and nobility's robes, a practice rooted in pre-colonial rituals that emphasized the silk's symbolic purity and connection to ancestral lands. European colonial efforts in the to cultivate silkmoths in colonies like and Georgia largely failed, as the species' dependence on specific host plants proved incompatible with controlled , leading to abandoned plantations by the early . Wild silk's cultural significance extended to symbolic roles in rituals and economies, as seen in where —derived from Antheraea assamensis—was reserved for wedding attire like the mekhela chador, worn by brides to invoke prosperity and worn by grooms in sets during biya ceremonies, reflecting its status as a fabric tied to community identity. Pre-19th-century trade in these wild varieties bolstered regional economies, with routes from to the generating revenues that supported artisan guilds and royal treasuries, fostering intercultural ties without the infrastructure of modern industrialization.

Production and Industry

In India

India is the world's largest producer of wild silk, collectively known as Vanya silk, which includes the non-mulberry varieties Tasar, Muga, and Eri, accounting for approximately 23% of the country's total silk production. The Central Silk Board (CSB), under the , oversees promotion and certification through the Vanya Silk Mark, ensuring purity and quality for these eco-friendly silks derived from semi-wild or wild silkworms. The primary varieties are Tasar silk, produced by the silkworm mylitta and yielding about 1,586 metric tons (MT) of raw silk in fiscal year 2023-24, primarily from forest-based rearing on Terminalia and other host trees such as and . , renowned for its golden hue, comes from assamensis and produced around 252 MT in recent years, almost exclusively in where it thrives on som (Machilus bombycina) and sualu (Litsea monopetala) plants. , from Samia ricini (also called Philosamia ricini), is a non-mulberry type fed on castor leaves, with production reaching 7,183 MT in 2023-24, making it the most abundant Vanya silk. Production is deeply integrated into community-based , particularly among tribal populations in states like for Tasar and for Muga and Eri, where families rear silkworms on forest trees or backyard plantations without extensive cultivation. Cocoons are collected from natural habitats or semi-cultivated areas, then reeled into —yielding threads of 200-500 meters per cocoon for Tasar—before being spun and woven into traditional fabrics such as sarees, shawls, and stoles using handlooms. This process emphasizes , as Vanya silks rely on wild host plants rather than farming. Economically, the Vanya silk sector employs a significant number of people, predominantly in rural and tribal regions, supporting livelihoods through CSB initiatives like the Silk Samagra program that provides training, seeds, and infrastructure. Exports of Vanya silk and products contribute to India's position in global niche markets for organic and artisanal textiles. Key challenges include risks of overharvesting cocoons from forests, which can deplete populations, and climate change impacts on host plants, such as altered rainfall patterns affecting Terminalia trees for Tasar in . The CSB addresses these through and climate-resilient breeding programs to sustain production.

In China and Other Regions

In China, wild silk production is dominated by the Chinese oak silkworm, Antheraea pernyi, which yields tussah silk primarily in the northeastern provinces of and , where oak trees provide the natural host for semi-wild rearing. This species accounts for approximately 90% of global A. pernyi output, with annual cocoon production exceeding 60,000 metric tons, supporting a blend of traditional open-forest and state-backed systems that enhance yield and disease control. The silk's natural pinkish-beige hue has been selectively bred into dyeable white variants through government-supported breeding programs, allowing for broader applications while maintaining the fiber's coarse texture and durability. These farms, often subsidized by provincial institutes, integrate wild collection with controlled propagation to produce around 10,000-15,000 metric tons of raw tussah silk annually, emphasizing through host plant conservation. Beyond China, wild silk industries remain niche and artisanal in scale. In Japan, Antheraea yamamai produces tensan silk, a strong, naturally white fiber harvested from limited oak-forest rearings, yielding only about 25-50 kg per major cycle due to challenges in scaling indoor or semi-wild methods, primarily for high-end cultural textiles. Thailand and Vietnam have extended eri silk production—derived from semi-wild Samia ricini on castor plants—into small commercial operations, with Thailand's facilities processing around 1-2% of national silk output through hybrid open-rearing techniques, focusing on ethical "peace silk" for export markets. Experimental and artisanal efforts characterize production elsewhere. In Brazil, researchers have explored native wild moths like bagworms (Eumeta variegata) for their exceptionally tough silk, conducting pilot rearings to assess commercial viability, though output remains under 100 kg annually in lab-scale trials. Africa's small-scale initiatives center on Gonometa postica in South Africa and neighboring countries, where communal harvesting from mopane woodlands yields high-quality, golden silk for local weaving cooperatives, producing roughly 10-20 tons yearly through low-impact wild collection. These processes often involve hybrid enclosure rearing to protect populations, contrasting with fully wild methods, and feed into global trade dynamics where Chinese tussah dominates exports—valued at approximately $20 million in raw form for 2024—supplying niche European markets for "oak silk" blends in luxury apparel. Recent trends include revival projects in Central America, where post-colonial declines in native moth rearing are being addressed through community-based experiments with local Saturniidae species to bolster biodiversity-linked income.

Sustainability and Modern Developments

Environmental Impact and Sustainability

Wild silk production offers several environmental benefits due to its reliance on natural forest ecosystems rather than intensive . Unlike cultivated mulberry , wild silk harvesting typically requires no pesticides, fertilizers, or , minimizing chemical and in production areas. This low-input approach supports by preserving diverse host plant habitats, such as those for tussar and muga silkmoths in India's northeastern forests, where over 24 wild silk moth species contribute to ecosystem health. Additionally, or peace silk practices, common in wild silk variants like eri and tussar, allow silkmoths to emerge from cocoons before harvesting, reducing mortality rates and alleviating population pressures on . Despite these advantages, wild silk production faces significant challenges that threaten its . Overcollection of cocoons has depleted wild stocks, particularly for the muga silkworm ( assamensis), which is at risk due to excessive harvesting and . In , , driven by expanding tea plantations has shrunk traditional muga host forests, exacerbating vulnerability to and reducing natural regeneration. Water usage during post-harvest reeling processes, though lower than in mulberry silk due to smaller-scale operations, still contributes to local resource strain in reeling centers. Sustainability initiatives are addressing these issues through community-led and conservation-focused strategies. In northeastern India, community forest management programs empower local tribes to regulate cocoon collection, fostering sustainable yields while protecting biodiversity hotspots; studies indicate higher biodiversity indices in managed versus degraded forests. Certifications such as and organic labels promote ethical sourcing for wild silks, ensuring habitat preservation and fair labor. Reforestation efforts, including host plant restoration in and , aim to bolster silkmoth populations and mitigate depletion risks. Wild silk's carbon footprint is notably low at approximately 0.5 kg CO₂ per kg produced, compared to 5-10 kg CO₂ for synthetic fibers like , highlighting its role in reducing emissions in supply chains. Projections suggest that expanded community management could sustain annual yields up to 500 metric tons without further depletion in key regions, provided habitat restoration accelerates.

Current Production and Innovations

As of 2023-24, global production of wild silk, encompassing non-mulberry varieties such as tussar, eri, muga, and oak tassar, is estimated at approximately 10,000-11,000 metric tonnes annually (including eri ), representing a small but growing segment of the overall industry. dominates with the majority of output, primarily from states like , , and , where reeled non-mulberry raw silk (tasar and muga) reached 1,838 metric tonnes (tasar: 1,586 MT; muga: 252 MT), and eri added 7,183 MT. contributes significantly through tussar () production estimated at 800-1,000 metric tonnes, while smaller volumes come from regions in , , and . The market value for wild silk stands at $150-200 million, with a projected annual growth rate of 5% fueled by increasing demand for eco-friendly textiles. In 2024-25 (provisional data as of early 2025), production of tasar and muga showed declines (tasar ~1,079 MT; muga ~187 MT), attributed to climate variability and issues, amid an overall 21% drop in India's total raw output. Market trends highlight a surge in "peace " or , which constitutes about 10% of wild production and emphasizes ethical harvesting without harming pupae, appealing to consumers. This variant, often , has seen adoption by luxury brands like , who incorporate it into collections for its appeal, contributing to a broader shift toward ethical sourcing. Export patterns are evolving, with growing shipments to the and , where regulations favor sustainable fibers, representing up to 30% of India's wild exports in recent years. Overall, the sector benefits from rising eco-demand, though it remains niche compared to mulberry . Recent innovations focus on enhancing efficiency and resilience in wild silk production. Genetic studies, including genomic sequencing of species like Antheraea mylitta (tussar moth), aim to develop disease-resistant strains adapted to climate variability, with projects in identifying key genes for improved cocoon quality. Automated reeling machines have boosted processing efficiency to up to 90%, minimizing waste from the irregular filaments typical of wild silks and enabling scalable output without compromising fiber integrity. Blends with synthetic fibers, such as or , enhance durability for apparel and , while advancements in introduce enzyme-based pretreatments for better dye uptake, allowing vibrant, eco-friendly coloration without harsh chemicals. Looking to 2030, wild silk production is projected to expand at 5-7% annually within a framework, emphasizing waste recycling from cocoons for biomedical applications and zero-waste reeling. However, challenges from , including erratic monsoons affecting host plant availability, could reduce yields by 10-20% in vulnerable regions like unless adaptive breeding accelerates.

Notable Species

Key Wild Silk-Producing Moths

Wild silk production relies on several key species, predominantly from the family (emperor moths), which are characterized by their large size, robust bodies, and wild or semi-wild lifestyles distinct from fully domesticated silkmoths like in the Bombycidae family. These species are polyphagous or oligophagous, heavily dependent on specific host plants for larval development, and their distributions are largely confined to forested regions where host availability dictates . One commercially significant , Gonometa postica, belongs to the family Lasiocampidae rather than , highlighting the diversity in lepidopteran families contributing to wild silk. While most of these moths are not formally listed as endangered by the IUCN, some species face threats from loss and , potentially impacting their . The primary commercial species are concentrated in Asia, where environmental conditions and traditional sericulture support their ecology, though one key producer is native to Africa. These moths exhibit life cycles tied to seasonal host plant availability, with larvae feeding voraciously before pupating in silk cocoons; unlike migratory butterflies, their populations show localized dispersal influenced by host plant cycles rather than long-distance migrations. Among the most important is Antheraea mylitta, the tasar silkworm, native to central and eastern , where it feeds primarily on sal (), arjuna (), and saja (Terminalia tomentosa) trees. Antheraea assamensis, known as the muga silkmoth, is endemic to northeastern , particularly and , and depends on host plants in the family, such as Machilus species. In , Antheraea pernyi, the Chinese tussah moth, is reared on (Quercus) species across northern provinces like and , with extensions into Korea and . The eri silkmoth, Samia ricini (formerly Philosamia ricini), is semi-domesticated and distributed across and , utilizing castor (Ricinus communis) as its main host. Gonometa postica, the African wild silkmoth, occurs in , including , , and , feeding on acacia trees such as camel thorn (Acacia erioloba). Another notable African species is Anaphe panda, found in equatorial regions, feeding on and trees.
Scientific NameCommon NamePrimary RegionHost Plants
Antheraea mylittaCentral/eastern , , Terminalia tomentosa
Antheraea assamensisNortheastern ()Machilus spp. ( family)
Antheraea pernyiNorthern ChinaQuercus spp. (oaks)
Samia riciniNortheast /Ricinus communis (castor)
Gonometa posticaAfrican wild silkmoth (, , )Acacia erioloba (camel thorn)
Anaphe pandaAfrican wild silkmoth spp., Artocarpus altilis

Variations in Their Silks

Wild silks exhibit significant variations in color, texture, strength, and yield depending on the producing species, influencing their suitability for specific applications. Tasar silk, derived from Antheraea mylitta, is characterized by its golden-brown hue and coarse texture, with fiber diameters typically ranging from 30 to 40 microns, making it robust for heavy-duty uses. This silk demonstrates higher tensile strength than cultivated mulberry silk, attributed to its unique structure, which supports applications in and durable fabrics. Each cocoon yields approximately 1-2 grams of silk, contributing to its economic viability in traditional production. Muga silk from assamensis stands out for its natural golden-yellow color and shimmering luster, which enhances with repeated washing due to improved color stability. Its exceptional durability, including resistance to degradation from washing, stems from a high tensile strength (around 3.5-4.0 g/denier). In , particularly , holds profound cultural significance, often used in ceremonial garments that symbolize heritage and prestige. Tussah silk, produced by , features a pale, off-white tone that readily accepts dyes, enabling versatile coloration in finished products. With a finer texture and fiber diameters around 20-35 microns, it offers a smoother hand feel compared to coarser wild silks, making it ideal for apparel such as suits and ties. Its mechanical properties, including good extensibility, support elegant, lightweight fabrics that balance strength and drape. Eri silk from Samia ricini is distinguished by its white, woolly appearance, obtained not from intact cocoons but from the pierced cocoons or peduncle remnants, rendering it (non-violent) as the moth is not killed during harvesting. This spun silk provides warmth and insulation due to its fluffy texture, commonly used in shawls and quilts for cold climates. Other wild silks, such as those from African species like Gonometa postica, present reddish tones and shorter fiber lengths with smaller diameters, resulting in a distinct, compact structure suitable for local traditions. Anaphe panda silk features crescent-shaped fibers with breaking strains around 15% and regain of 9%. These variations highlight the adaptability of wild silks to regional needs.
Silk TypeColorFiber Length/DiameterKey Uses
Tasar (A. mylitta)Golden-brownCoarse, 30-40 μmUpholstery, durable fabrics
Muga (A. assamensis)Golden-yellowFiner, 11-15 μmCeremonial garments, heirlooms
Tussah (A. pernyi)Pale/off-white20-35 μmSuits, ties, apparel
Eri (S. ricini)WhiteWoolly, spun ~19 μmShawls, quilts
African (G. postica)ReddishShorter, small diameterLocal textiles
Anaphe (A. panda)NaturalCrescent-shaped, ~20 μmTraditional fabrics

References

  1. https://www.jircas.go.jp/sites/default/files/publication/jarq/31-4-287-294_0.pdf
  2. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12221-025-01169-8
  3. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332632964_Wild_Silk_fibers_Types_Properties_and_Utilization_Areas
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8848051/
  5. https://www.butterfliesandmoths.org/taxonomy/Saturniidae
  6. https://mississippientomologicalmuseum.org.msstate.edu/AnthroEnt/Textiles/Introduction.html
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4206231/
  8. https://graphsearch.epfl.ch/en/concept/21308514
  9. https://www.heddels.com/dictionary/silk/
  10. https://doeraa.com/en-us/blogs/doeraa-diaries/types-of-silks-in-india-and-their-uses
  11. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tussah
  12. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=textiles_facpub
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11595228/
  14. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=textiles_facpub
  15. https://www.entomologyjournals.com/assets/archives/2025/vol10issue2/10036.pdf
  16. https://www.shivajicollege.ac.in/sPanel/uploads/econtent/d7087d76d2106f258390ba1ec46c7e1c.pdf
  17. https://www.notesonzoology.com/sericulture/life-cycle-of-various-silk-moths/323
  18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354209160_MUGA_SILKWORM_ANTHERAEA_ASSAMENSIS_HELFER_LEPIDOPTERA_SATURNIIDAE_-AN_OVERVIEW_OF_DISTRIBUTION_LIFE_CYCLE_DISEASE_AND_CONTROL_MEASURE
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337441888_Biology_of_eri_silkworm_Samia_ricini_Donovan_on_castor_Ricinus_communis_L
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12214580/
  21. https://journals.ansfoundation.org/index.php/jans/article/view/1163
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Cocoon-weight-shell-weight-and-shell-ratio-in-various-population-of-A_tbl1_339579261
  23. https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO201205759629532.page
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4372302/
  25. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep12706
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0021979716303897
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264978740_Cocoon_of_the_silkworm_Antheraea_pernyi_as_an_example_of_a_thermally_insulating_biological_interface
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334481586_New_Evidence_for_Early_Silk_in_the_Indus_Civilization
  29. https://www.chinasilkmuseum.com/info_180.aspx?itemid=27699
  30. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1387&context=tsaconf
  31. http://www.silkroadfoundation.org/artl/silkhistory.shtml
  32. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/forests/cocoons-of-hope-where-wild-silk-meets-tribal-hands
  33. https://sino-platonic.org/complete/spp194_justinian_silk.pdf
  34. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/silks-from-ottoman-turkey
  35. https://www.econhistdbm.com/uploads/8/1/9/7/81977286/silkpacific.pdf
  36. https://www.academia.edu/5467408/WILD_SILK_AN_INTRODUCTION
  37. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/unravelled-dreams/persistence/277BC9D10E98F0C911F9B4EB1934D3BE
  38. https://www.utsavpedia.com/weddings-festivals/wedding-in-assam/
  39. https://www.ibef.org/exports/indian-silk-industry
  40. https://silkmarkindia.com/index.php/2024/03/03/silk-mark-safeguarding-the-purity-sanctity-of-silk-cloned-603-5/
  41. https://dataful.in/datasets/482/
  42. https://agriculture.institute/introduction-to-sericulture/types-of-silk-in-india/
  43. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2120877
  44. https://www.eoiparis.gov.in/content/at.pdf
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383445559_CLIMATE_CHANGE_AND_ITS_IMPACT_ON_SERICULTURE
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S3050516X2500002X
  47. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28535207/
  48. https://academic.oup.com/jinsectscience/article/10/1/180/887115
  49. https://mississippientomologicalmuseum.org.msstate.edu/AnthroEnt/Textiles/Species/Antheraea_pernyi.html
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317097095_Antheraea_pernyi_Lepidoptera_Saturniidae_and_Its_Importance_in_Sericulture_Food_Consumption_and_Traditional_Chinese_Medicine
  51. https://www.jircas.go.jp/sites/default/files/publication/jarq/15-2-122-132_0.pdf
  52. https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/general/1201117/ericulture-reeling-them-in
  53. https://mississippientomologicalmuseum.org.msstate.edu/AnthroEnt/Textiles/Species/Samia_ricini.html
  54. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-09350-3
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365821213_Some_Physical_Properties_of_Brazilian_Wild_Lepidoptera_Silks
  56. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/china/textile-trade-silk/cn-export-raw-silk-not-thrown-tussah-silk
  57. https://www2.cs.arizona.edu/patterns/weaving/articles/sm2_silk.pdf
  58. https://www.ekodoku.com/en/blogs/ekodoku-blog/baris-i%25CC%2587pegi%25CC%2587-ahi%25CC%2587msa-i%25CC%2587pek-ve-yabani%25CC%2587-i%25CC%2587pek-surdurulebi%25CC%2587li%25CC%2587r-modanin-i%25CC%2587ki%25CC%2587-yuzu
  59. http://www.plantarchives.org/SI%2520VSOG/10.pdf
  60. https://www.commonobjective.co/article/fibre-briefing-peace-silk
  61. https://india.mongabay.com/2018/02/assams-muga-silkworm-battles-climate-change/
  62. https://cosh.eco/en/articles/material-silk
  63. https://weavearealpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Summer-2023.pdf
  64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283999117_Wild_silk_Wild_silk_enterprise_programs_to_alleviate_poverty_and_protect_habitats
  65. https://wjpr.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/article_issue/bab951a5e3cc9dac4fa68582823a82af.pdf
  66. https://uplink.weforum.org/uplink/s/uplink-contribution/a012o00002hdykiAAA/innovations-to-grow-wild-silk-value-chain-in-tropical-forests
  67. https://www.texmin.gov.in/sites/default/files/Table-1%20Sericulture%20Statistics%20of%20India-A%20Glance.pdf
  68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393744286_Global_Perspective_on_Silk_An_Economic_Analysis_of_International_Sericulture_Trade
  69. https://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/silks-news/india-s-raw-silk-output-drops-21-in-fy25-after-3-years-of-growth-csb-301727-newsdetails.htm
  70. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395534019_Innovations_in_Wild_Silk_Processing_and_Applications_A_Comparative_Review_of_African_and_Other_Wild_Silks
  71. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384130363_Innovations_in_Sericulture_an_Advancements_in_Silk_Production_and_Quality_Improvement
  72. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925000582
  73. https://weadapt.org/?case-study=how-a-wild-silk-moth-is-weaving-resilience-in-java
  74. https://academic.oup.com/ae/article-pdf/39/3/151/18739549/ae39-0151.pdf
  75. https://www.eje.cz/artkey/eje-201302-0026_Muga_silkworm_Antheraea_assamensis_Lepidoptera_Saturniidae_-_an_overview_of_distribution_biology_and_breed.php
  76. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5824
  77. https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/mcguire/collection/featured-collections/wild-silks/
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/antheraea-mylitta
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12075178/
  80. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Structural-properties-of-mulberry-and-tasar-silk_tbl2_265817418
  81. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324241053_Rearing_performance_of_tropical_Tasar_silkworm_Antheraea_mylitta_Drury_on_Cashew_Anacardium_occidentale_L_and_its_commercial_silk_properties
  82. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287071810_Muga_silkworm_antheraea_assamensis_Lepidoptera_Saturniidae_-_An_overview_of_distribution_biology_and_breeding
  83. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367504712_Muga_silk_Sustainable_materials_for_emerging_technology
  84. https://ncfa.co.in/muga-silk/
  85. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2511&context=extension_curall
  86. http://www.wildfibres.co.uk/html/tussah_silk.html
  87. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249354604_Study_on_the_Mechanical_Properties_of_Different_Silkworm_Silk_Fibers
  88. https://www.academia.edu/43720323/A_REVIEW_ON_VANYA_THE_WILD_SILKWORMS
  89. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267872800_Structure_and_Properties_of_Silk_from_the_African_Wild_Silkmoth_Gonometa_postica_Reared_Indoors
  90. https://www.science.gov/topicpages/c/cocoons.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.