Hubbry Logo
Winston SilcottWinston SilcottMain
Open search
Winston Silcott
Community hub
Winston Silcott
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Winston Silcott
Winston Silcott
Winston Silcott
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Winston Silcott (born 1959),[1] a British citizen born to Caribbean (Montserrat) parents, was wrongfully convicted in March 1987, as one of the "Tottenham Three", for the murder of PC Keith Blakelock on the night of 6 October 1985 during the Broadwater Farm riot in north London – despite not having been near the scene. The convictions of all three individuals were quashed on 25 November 1991 after scientific tests suggested the men's confessions had been fabricated.

Silcott received compensation of £17,000 for his wrongful conviction. Two of the investigating police officers were prosecuted for fabricating evidence but were acquitted in 1994. Silcott received a further £50,000 in compensation from the Metropolitan Police in an out-of-court settlement which ended a civil action against the force for malicious prosecution.[2]

Silcott was convicted in 1979 and sent to prison for six months for his part in a nightclub brawl.[1] In 1979 he was tried for and acquitted of murder.[citation needed]

In 1989, the London School of Economics Students' Union elected Silcott as Honorary President, as a protest against miscarriages of justice.

Silcott served 18 years' imprisonment for the murder of boxer and nightclub bouncer Tony Smith, for which he was on bail when Blakelock was killed. Silcott claimed that he killed Smith in self-defence after an altercation in which he feared for his life and felt he had no choice but to attack, but was disbelieved by the jury.[3] He was released from Blantyre House Prison in October 2003. Silcott had also served a six-month prison sentence for assault in a nightclub prior to his conviction for the murder of Smith.[1]

In 2005, the police recruited Silcott to run a youth centre on the Broadwater Farm Estate, in a bid to reduce youth crime in the area.

In March 2007, he was found guilty of theft from shops for a second time since his release from prison.[citation needed]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Winston Silcott

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Winston Silcott (born 1959) is a British man of Montserratian descent convicted in March 1987, alongside Engin Raghip and Mark Braithwaite (collectively known as the Tottenham Three), for the murder of Police Constable Keith Blakelock, who was stabbed to death while responding to the Broadwater Farm riot in Tottenham, north London, on 6 October 1985. The riot, sparked by the police custody death of Cynthia Jarrett, involved clashes between residents and officers, resulting in Blakelock's killing amid a mob attack. Silcott, a founding member of the Broadwater Farm Youth Association with prior convictions including for stabbing, was on bail at the time for the suspected murder of boxer Anthony Smith. The trio's murder convictions were quashed by the Court of Appeal on 25 November 1991 after forensic examination revealed that police pocketbook notes—key to verifying records—had been withheld from the defense, rendering the verdicts unsafe due to apparent fabrication of during questioning. Silcott was subsequently retried and convicted in 1990 for Smith's 1984 murder, for which he served 18 years in prison before in 2003, having exceeded the typical for such offenses. The Blakelock case, emblematic of tensions over police conduct and riot inquiries like the Gifford Report, remains unsolved in terms of definitive perpetrators, though later investigations in the led to other convictions unrelated to Silcott. Silcott has maintained his innocence in the Blakelock killing while acknowledging his criminal history, amid ongoing debates over evidential integrity in high-profile 1980s cases.

Early Life and Background

Childhood and Upbringing

Winston Silcott was born in 1959 to parents Bill and Mary, who had immigrated to from in the during the wave of migration. The family, devout Seventh-day Adventists, settled in , , where Silcott grew up on the housing estate, a high-rise development built in the that housed many immigrant families. His upbringing occurred in a predominantly working-class facing significant socioeconomic challenges, including high rates—reaching up to 90% in parts of the estate at its nadir—and deteriorating amid broader in areas like during the 1970s. These conditions contributed to environmental factors such as and social strain, though specific details on Silcott's formal education or early peer associations remain limited in available records.

Initial Criminal Involvement

Silcott, born in 1959 to parents from who settled in , entered petty criminality during his early teenage years amid Tottenham's socioeconomic challenges. The area, part of Haringey's inner-city landscape, featured high levels of poverty, unemployment, and racial tensions in the 1970s, fostering environments where youth petty crime—such as and minor —became prevalent among working-class immigrant communities. These conditions provided causal incentives for opportunistic offenses but did not determine outcomes, as personal agency dictated escalation from to deliberate law-breaking. His initial documented police contact occurred around age 14 or 15, when he was arrested for failing to display a lamp—a trivial violation signaling an emerging of defiance against . This minor offense reflected broader territorial posturing among Tottenham's adolescent males, who navigated limited legitimate prospects through and small-scale property crimes to assert dominance in neighborhood enclaves. Such activities, while rooted in deprivation, underscored individual choices prioritizing aggression over restraint, setting a trajectory of habitual offending independent of external excuses. By the mid-1970s, Silcott had left school without qualifications, amplifying his vulnerability to street-level hustles that prioritized short-term gains over long-term stability. This phase marked his transition from isolated infractions to associative patterns with peers engaged in escalating aggression for control, distinct from later violent episodes, and emblematic of how economic marginalization intersected with unchecked impulsivity in shaping early criminal trajectories.

Pre-1985 Criminal Record

1979 Nightclub Incident

In 1979, Winston Silcott became involved in a violent altercation at a following an argument, during which he was reportedly attacked by another individual wielding a broken . Silcott responded by striking the assailant with a chair leg, causing serious . Silcott was convicted of malicious wounding, a charge equivalent to causing with intent under UK law at the time, reflecting the court's determination that his actions exceeded lawful despite any claims to the contrary. He received a six-month sentence for the offense, marking his first documented for serious violence and demonstrating a pattern of physical escalation in confrontations. The conviction underscored Silcott's readiness to employ improvised weapons in disputes, as evidenced by the use of the chair leg to inflict substantial harm. Court proceedings focused on the extent of the injuries sustained by the victim, leading to the guilty verdict without successful mitigation based on provocation.

Acquittal in Earlier Murder Case

In 1979, Winston Silcott faced trial for the murder of 19-year-old Lennie McIntosh, a and part-time stabbed to outside a party in , north London. The charge stemmed from allegations of Silcott's direct involvement in the fatal stabbing amid altercations at the event. The initial trial ended with a unable to agree on a , necessitating a retrial. In the second proceeding, held in 1980, Silcott was acquitted after the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond . This outcome, based on evidentiary shortcomings rather than affirmative proof of innocence, left unresolved questions about his role, as the case proceeded to jury despite initial police and witness scrutiny. The acquittal exemplified the high burden of proof in , distinguishing it from mere dismissal of charges.

Broadwater Farm Riots and PC Blakelock Murder

Context of the 1985 Riots

The estate in , , had deteriorated into a high-crime area by the mid-1980s, characterized by widespread drug dealing, gang activity, and rates exceeding 60 percent among residents. Built in the as social housing, the estate suffered from poor maintenance, isolation from surrounding neighborhoods via elevated walkways, and a reputation for harboring criminal elements, including organized theft and violence that prompted frequent police operations. Winston Silcott, a local resident with a prior , was known in the community amid this environment of entrenched lawlessness. Tensions escalated on 5 October 1985 when four officers conducted a search of the home of Cynthia Jarrett, a 49-year-old woman and mother of five, as part of an investigation into theft by her son-in-law. During the raid, Jarrett suffered a heart attack and died at the scene, later ruled accidental by due to underlying cardiac issues rather than direct police assault. This incident, perceived by residents as emblematic of aggressive policing in a distrustful context—exacerbated by recent disturbances—sparked outrage, leading to a protest march to Tottenham the following evening. By 6 October 1985, the demonstration devolved into riots involving approximately 500 officers confronting mobs hurling bricks, bottles, and petrol bombs, resulting in arson attacks on vehicles, shops, and buildings alongside widespread looting. At least 58 police officers and 24 civilians required hospitalization from injuries sustained in the clashes, which intensified as rioters targeted firefighting efforts responding to the blazes. The violence, rooted in the immediate fallout from the Jarrett search but fueled by the estate's chronic criminal undercurrents, marked a rapid shift from grievance to organized mob disorder rather than sustained systemic protest.

Silcott's Alleged Role

Police investigations following the October 6, 1985, identified Winston Silcott as a central figure in the mob that overwhelmed and killed PC Keith Blakelock, who sustained 43 stab wounds from multiple weapons during a frenzied that included attempts to decapitate him with a machete-like blade. Authorities described Silcott as the ringleader directing the group's actions amid the chaos. Witness accounts, including a confession from local resident Jason Hill who admitted participating in the attack, implicated Silcott specifically as wielding a that struck Blakelock's neck, positioning him at the forefront of the lethal violence rather than a peripheral mob member. At the time, Silcott was on bail pending trial for the 1984 murder of boxer Tony Smith, a status that placed him amid established local posse networks known for territorial control and escalating confrontations, enabling his alleged coordination of the assault's intensity during the riot's peak. Such mob brutality underscores individual agency and premeditated choice in wielding weapons against a disoriented officer, where personal culpability for the stabbing frenzy overrides attributions of collective victimhood or diffused responsibility in crowd settings.

1987 Conviction for Blakelock Murder

Trial Proceedings

The trial of Winston Silcott, Engin Raghip, and Mark Braithwaite for the murder of PC Keith Blakelock was conducted jointly at the in in 1987. The prosecution advanced the argument that the defendants bore for the mob's fatal assault on Blakelock, with Silcott positioned as the ringleader directing the group's actions. This strategy highlighted the coordinated nature of the attack amid the riots, imputing joint enterprise liability to the trio for the officer's death. On 19 March 1987, following the jury's deliberations, all three defendants were found guilty of murder. The verdicts affirmed the prosecution's portrayal of their pivotal roles in the mob's onslaught, rejecting defenses centered on peripheral involvement or lack of intent. Sentencing occurred immediately after the convictions, with each man receiving the mandatory for murder. The judge imposed a recommended minimum tariff of 30 years on Silcott, emphasizing the deliberate savagery of the killing and its devastating effect on Blakelock's family. This tariff reflected judicial recognition of the crime's exceptional brutality within the context of the riot's chaos.

Evidence Presented

The prosecution presented police interview notes from Silcott's questioning on October 7 and 8, 1985, as central evidence, recording alleged admissions of involvement in the attack on PC Blakelock. These notes attributed statements to Silcott, including an acknowledgment of taking the officer's truncheon and a reference to the as "we killed the pig," purportedly in response to questions about using a and inciting others. The notes were signed by Silcott and two interviewing officers, Det. Chief Supt. Melvin and Det. Insp. Lambie, and formed the basis for claims of his active participation. Testimonies and statements from younger riot participants further implicated Silcott in directing or joining the assault. Jason Hill, a 13-year-old charged alongside the adults, provided a presented to the that named Silcott as involved in the killing, describing his role in the mob's actions. Similar accounts from other juveniles, such as Mark Pennant, aged 15, portrayed Silcott as a figure urging amid the , consistent with the prosecution's narrative of coordinated attack. No direct forensic evidence tied Silcott to specific weapons or the immediate , such as blood traces or fingerprints on implements like machetes recovered from the area. The combined testimonial and confessional material, however, met the evidentiary threshold for the jury's guilty verdict on March 19, 1987, sentencing Silcott to .

1991 Acquittal and Aftermath

Appeal and Quashing of Conviction

On 25 November 1991, the Court of Appeal quashed the convictions of Winston Silcott, Engin Raghip, and Mark Braithwaite for the murder of PC Keith Blakelock, ruling them unsafe after a hearing that lasted approximately 90 minutes. The decision hinged on forensic scientific evidence obtained post-trial, which indicated that the police records of Silcott's interviews—containing his alleged confession admitting to inciting the fatal attack—had been fabricated or significantly altered. Analysis of the original notepad revealed indentations and inconsistencies suggesting the notes were not made contemporaneously during the interviews but reconstructed afterward, with key admissions added or modified by investigating officers. The appeal court emphasized that non-disclosure of these original, unedited notes during the 1987 trial constituted a material irregularity, as the was the cornerstone of the prosecution's case against Silcott, with other evidence—such as identifications and circumstantial links to the —deemed insufficient to sustain independently. While the ruling declared a due to procedural flaws and evidence tampering, it did not equate to a finding of factual , leaving open questions about Silcott's involvement amid the evidential weaknesses exposed. No retrial was pursued for Silcott on the Blakelock charge, as the compromised interview records rendered the remaining evidence unreliable for reprosecution. Silcott had served roughly four years of his life sentence for the Blakelock murder by the time of the quashing, having been convicted in March 1987; the immediate effect was his release from custody tied to that , though he remained imprisoned pending a concurrent sentence for an unrelated offense. The judgment highlighted systemic issues in the handling of suspect interviews by detectives during the Broadwater Farm investigation, prompting scrutiny of similar practices but stopping short of broader exoneration claims.

Compensation and Police Misconduct Claims

Following the 1991 quashing of his conviction, Silcott received £17,000 in compensation from the as redress for his wrongful imprisonment in the Blakelock murder case. In October 1999, he secured an additional £50,000 through an out-of-court settlement with the in a civil claim alleging and related investigative improprieties. The settlement explicitly did not constitute an admission of liability by the police, who described it as a reluctant resolution to avoid prolonged litigation. The civil action centered on allegations of police fabrication of evidence, particularly interview notes that formed a key basis for Silcott's original conviction. Forensic examinations revealed that portions of these notes had been altered or inserted post-interview, prompting prosecution of two senior investigating officers—Detective Chief Superintendent Graham Melvin and Detective Inspector Christopher Sharrock—for by creating false records. The officers were tried in 1994 but acquitted by a , which unanimously found insufficient evidence of deliberate fabrication. These misconduct claims arose amid broader scrutiny of the Blakelock investigation's handling, including the loss of original interview records and reliance on police reconstructions, which the Court of Appeal had deemed unreliable in overturning the convictions. Despite the settlement and prior acquittal of the officers, the Metropolitan Police maintained that the payment addressed procedural disputes rather than endorsing claims of systemic wrongdoing, and Silcott pursued further legal costs exceeding £500,000, which the force contested in court. No formal public inquiry into the investigation's conduct was commissioned, leaving resolution to individual civil proceedings and the failed criminal charges against the officers.

Subsequent Convictions and Imprisonment

Murder of Tony Smith

In December 1984, Winston Silcott stabbed 24-year-old Anthony Smith to death during a fight at a party in . Smith, an amateur boxer and nightclub bouncer, was killed with a during the altercation. Silcott was charged with murder and granted bail in May 1985, prior to the October riots at . At trial in 1986, he claimed , asserting that Smith had attacked him with the fatal knife. The jury rejected this defense and convicted him of at the Central Criminal Court. Silcott received a mandatory life sentence for the murder, with the judge imposing it based on the jury's finding of with . Subsequent appeals, including a 1998 bid to refer the case to the Court of Appeal, were denied, upholding the .

Time Served and Parole Conditions

Silcott received a life sentence with a 14-year following his for the 1984 murder of boxer Anthony Smith. He completed this minimum term in the summer of 1999 but remained imprisoned for an additional four years thereafter. The extended detention beyond the tariff stemmed from Parole Board evaluations deeming him a continued public risk, informed by his broader criminal history including prior violent offenses, rather than solely the Smith conviction. A 1999 Parole Board report commended Silcott as a model for his work mentoring young offenders, yet did not result in immediate release. He underwent multiple parole hearings, with denials reflecting persistent high-risk classifications despite good conduct reports. In June 2002, Silcott was transferred to an , signaling progress in risk reduction assessments and paving the way for eventual approval after approximately 17 years served overall—exceeding the typical 12- to 14-year average for life sentences. conditions emphasized stringent supervision, including mandatory oversight, residence restrictions, and prohibitions on associating with known criminals, calibrated to his assessed propensity for based on empirical behavioral data from records.

Release and Post-Release Life

2003 Release

Winston Silcott was released from House in on October 17, 2003, after serving 18 years for the 1988 murder of Tony Smith, with his life licence officially activated on October 21. The had recommended based on favorable reports from and staff assessing that the 43-year-old posed no further risk to the public. This recommendation received approval from ministers and Lord Chief Justice Lord Woolf, despite ongoing media coverage highlighting public concerns tied to Silcott's prior involvement in high-profile cases. As a lifer on licence, Silcott faced stringent lifelong conditions enforced by the , mandating regular reporting to officers and compliance with behavioral restrictions, with any violation—such as reoffending or failing to adhere to supervisory requirements—triggering automatic recall to custody. Initial post-release arrangements included an immediate meeting with a probation officer to formalize the licence terms, ensuring close monitoring during resettlement at an undisclosed location to mitigate security risks. The process emphasized rehabilitation through structured oversight, though Silcott's solicitor noted his ongoing intent to pursue full in related matters.

Later Activities and Public Statements

Following his release from prison on October 21, 2003, Silcott maintained a relatively low public profile, focusing on family reintegration while occasionally engaging in media interviews to assert his innocence in the 1985 of PC Keith Blakelock. In a statement issued upon parole approval, he expressed intent to rejoin his family and pursue overturning his original conviction. In January 2004, Silcott provided his first detailed public account of the riot night to , denying any participation in the attack on Blakelock and alleging police fabrication of evidence against him, including claims that officers targeted him due to his prominence in the local community. He described being elsewhere during the violence and emphasized systemic as the basis for his wrongful implication. Post-release, Silcott received numerous invitations to social gatherings and political discussions organized by community groups across the , reflecting perceptions among some activists of his case as emblematic of institutional . By 2011, reports noted his continued advocacy through supporters who framed his experiences as evidence of framing by authorities, though he avoided high-visibility roles. No subsequent criminal convictions have been documented in public records up to 2025, aligning with descriptions of a subdued existence amid periodic references to unresolved Blakelock case inquiries.

Controversies and Debates

Police Perspective on Guilt

The have maintained that Winston Silcott's involvement in the murder of PC Keith Blakelock during the on October 6, 1985, was supported by multiple eyewitness identifications from participants in the mob, who described Silcott as wielding a blade and directing the attack on the officer. These accounts, including statements from individuals who admitted kicking and stabbing Blakelock, placed Silcott at the center of the frenzied assault, where the officer was hacked with at least 28 wounds using makeshift weapons like knives and fence posts. Police investigators have characterized the 1991 Court of Appeal quashing of Silcott's conviction—due to non-contemporaneous notes later ruled as fabricated—as a procedural irregularity that undermined the trial process but did not negate the underlying evidentiary indicators of his culpability, such as his proximity to the and reputed leadership among rioters. Officers involved in the original , including those who reviewed post-acquittal materials, have reiterated that the fabrication pertained to record-keeping practices under pressure, not the veracity of witness testimonies or forensic alignments pointing to Silcott's role in the mob's coordinated violence. The Blakelock murder investigation remains classified as unsolved by the as of 2025, with Silcott consistently regarded internally as a based on persistent review of case files, including ballistic and injury pattern analyses consistent with described mob dynamics. Retired and active officers have publicly expressed frustration that the acquittal represented a technical rather than substantive , emphasizing Silcott's documented history of violence as contextually reinforcing his likely participation in the riot's lethal escalation. Blakelock's family has echoed this perspective, advocating for renewed scrutiny of Silcott's involvement; in 1999, his three sons announced plans to pursue against Silcott for the , citing eyewitness and the officer's findings as compelling grounds for beyond the criminal . This stance aligns with police calls for re-examination, underscoring a that empirical indicators of guilt—such as Silcott's evasion during the riot and subsequent admissions from associates—outweigh procedural flaws in affirming his central role.

Claims of Systemic Bias vs. Criminal History

Silcott's acquittal in the murder of PC Keith Blakelock has been invoked by some activists and commentators as emblematic of systemic racial bias within the Metropolitan Police, with allegations of fabricated evidence cited as proof of targeted framing against black suspects in high-profile cases. Such claims, often amplified in left-leaning outlets, portray Silcott as a primary victim of institutional racism amid the tensions of 1980s Tottenham, where police-community relations were strained by events like the earlier shooting of Cherry Groce. This narrative, however, discounts Silcott's established pattern of violent criminality, which predated and persisted independently of the Blakelock case. In 1979, he received a six-month sentence for a violent offense, marking an early documented involvement in aggression. By 1984, Silcott stabbed to death Anthony Smith, a 24-year-old amateur boxer and reputed gangster, during a party confrontation involving rival groups; he was convicted of this murder in February 1986 at the Old Bailey and sentenced to life imprisonment, remaining on bail for it at the time of the October 1985 riot. He ultimately served 18 years for Smith's killing before parole in 2003, a conviction never overturned despite appeals claiming self-defense. Silcott's reputation as a dominant figure in Broadwater Farm's underworld—described in court and media accounts as ruling through fear, with ties to local posses amid gang rivalries—further underscores personal agency over collective victimhood. While the Blakelock notes' fabrication warranted quashing that specific verdict, his separate, upheld murder conviction and history of violence indicate case-specific misconduct rather than pervasive framing; empirical outcomes—conviction in one homicide, acquittal in another—align more with evidentiary variances than systemic targeting. Portrayals minimizing this record, as seen in some advocacy pieces, risk conflating isolated police errors with broader exoneration, sidelining causal factors like individual choices in a locale rife with gang activity.

Impact on Broader Discussions of Riots and Justice

The of Winston Silcott in 1991, following revelations of falsified police notes, exemplified investigative in riot-related prosecutions and eroded in the handling of from the 1985 disturbances. This development prompted legal precedents emphasizing the unreliability of coerced or manipulated statements, influencing subsequent challenges to convictions in high-profile disorder cases and calls for stricter oversight of police documentation practices. Silcott's case amplified narratives portraying the Tottenham riot as a legitimate backlash against perceived institutional and aggressive policing tactics, such as the preceding death of Cynthia Jarrett during a house search on October 5, 1985, which campaigners cited as emblematic of broader tensions in deprived, multi-ethnic estates. In racial justice discourse, it fueled arguments for viewing urban unrest not merely as criminal opportunism but as symptomatic of unaddressed grievances, informing analyses of later events like the where similar themes of police-community alienation resurfaced. However, sources emphasizing empirical patterns of violence during the riot— including the brutal mob killing of PC Keith Blakelock on October 6, 1985—contended that such framing risked minimizing accountability for participants' actions. The interplay between Silcott's overturned murder conviction for Blakelock and his upheld life sentence for the 1984 stabbing death of Tony Smith introduced nuance to debates, challenging binary views of riot-era defendants as either framed innocents or irredeemable criminals. Critics from perspectives argued that evidentiary lapses, while warranting remedies like Silcott's reported compensation exceeding £1 million, should not eclipse the riot's documented toll—over 50 officers injured and widespread —or deter robust responses to collective violence. This duality persists in discussions, underscoring the challenge of reconciling procedural safeguards with causal factors in riots, such as entrenched local rates predating the unrest, to foster credible preventive measures without politicized overgeneralizations.

References

  1. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3208724.stm
  2. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-26687661
  3. https://livinginmontserrat.wordpress.com/2020/06/05/4346/
  4. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/1999/10/silc-o21.html
  5. https://www.statewatch.org/statewatch-database/tottenham-three-vindicated/
  6. http://berniegrantarchive.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Gifford-Report-2-Chapter-4.-The-Three-Murder-Convictions.pdf
  7. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/deborah-orr/the-police-must-learn-to-live-with-winston-silcott-91723.html
  8. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2004/jan/18/ukcrime.race
  9. https://municipaldreams.wordpress.com/2017/11/07/broadwater_farm_part_i/
  10. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/15/broadwater-farm-whats-the-future-for-britains-most-notorious-hou/
  11. https://academic.oup.com/book/55815/chapter/435529180
  12. https://revolutionarycommunist.org/britain/fight-racism/broadwater-farm-40-years-on-from-resistance-to-repression/
  13. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1480999
  14. https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/publications/cjm/article/policing-riots-bristol-and-brixton-tottenham-toxteth-handsworth-etc
  15. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/1999/dec/12/theobserver.uknews7
  16. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/profile-is-he-icon-or-demon-peter-victor-reports-on-a-man-vilified-by-the-daily-mail-but-lionised-as-a-victim-by-the-left-1374888.html
  17. https://www.thetimes.com/article/silcott-to-be-freed-after-serving-17-years-for-murder-9sxvqgqtj8f
  18. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/silcott-to-be-released-18-years-after-blakelock-murder-case-91587.html
  19. https://www.standard.co.uk/hp/front/winston-silcott-is-released-6965585.html
  20. https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/476528.stm
  21. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-26362633
  22. https://history.inquest.org.uk/case-profiles/cynthia-jarrett/
  23. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/the-broadwater-farm-riots-40-years-on/
  24. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/broadwater-farm-study-mob-violence
  25. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-26872581
  26. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-26825549
  27. https://kenanmalik.com/2014/03/21/creating-the-beast-of-broadwater-farm/
  28. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/oct/21/prisonsandprobation.society
  29. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/9485096/Pc-Keith-Blakelock-Murder-on-Farms-darkest-night.html
  30. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10753489/Pc-Keith-Blakelock-murder-trial-How-events-unfolded.html
  31. https://evidencebasedjustice.exeter.ac.uk/case/winston-silcott/
  32. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/detectives-fabricated-silcott-evidence-notes-were-altered-after-interview-with-blakelock-murder-suspect-court-told-1425764.html
  33. https://www.amnesty.org/es/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/eur030021990en.pdf
  34. https://pasttense.co.uk/2016/03/19/today-in-londons-legal-history-tottenham-3-wrongly-convicted-of-pc-blakelocks-murder-1987/
  35. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/jan/18/ukcrime.davidrose
  36. http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/november/25/newsid_2546000/2546177.stm
  37. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/1999/oct/16/vikramdodd1
  38. https://www.theguardian.com/fromthearchive/story/0%2C%2C1092766%2C00.html
  39. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/476231.stm
  40. http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/low/dates/stories/october/15/newsid_3109000/3109931.stm
  41. https://www.the-independent.com/news/scotland-yard-refuses-to-pay-pounds-500-000-silcott-legal-bill-1125557.html
  42. https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk/detectives-fabricated-silcott-evidence-notes-were-altered-after-interview-with-blakelock-murder-suspect-court-told-1425764.html
  43. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/1999/nov/13/race.world
  44. https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk/detectives-cleared-over-silcott-case-jury-unanimous-that-two-officers-did-not-fabricate-evidence-on-pc-blakelock-killing-will-bennett-reports-1416435.html
  45. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/scotland-yard-faces-pounds-500-000-legal-bill-over-silcott-1125217.html
  46. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/oct/20/ukcrime
  47. https://www.standard.co.uk/hp/front/killer-who-always-said-he-was-innocent-7223867.html
  48. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2012635.stm
  49. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1444247/Killer-Silcott-to-go-free-after-serving-17-years.html
  50. https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/written-answers/1987/apr/27/mr-winston-silcott-bail
  51. https://www.socialistparty.org.uk/articles/12543/16-08-2011/winston-silcott-framed-by-the-police-and-justice-system/
  52. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/217049.stm
  53. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/oct/16/ukcrime.rebeccaallison
  54. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/1999/dec/12/lifeandhealth.foodanddrink
  55. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/2057093.stm
  56. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/3208140.stm
  57. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1444641/Silcott-released-from-jail.html
  58. https://www.thetimes.com/travel/destinations/uk-travel/england/london-travel/news-in-brief-m0v2vt7lhtw
  59. https://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/news/424820.winston-silcott-freed/
  60. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-26687661
  61. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/nov/13/ukcrime.features11
  62. https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/focus-in-the-face-of-prejudice-1199525.html
  63. https://www.murdermap.co.uk/unsolved-murders/tottenham-riots-the-unsolved-murder-of-keith-blakelock/
  64. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/481185.stm
  65. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/3194544.stm
  66. https://www.newsshopper.co.uk/news/6488761.meta-namedescription-contenta-violent-criminal-who-ruled-a-community-by-fear-with-a-conviction/
  67. https://www.thejusticegap.com/the-murder-of-pc-blakelock-and-the-search-for-truth/
  68. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-34433752
  69. https://www.casemine.com/commentary/uk/silcott-v.-commissioner-of-the-police-for-the-metropolis:-upholding-the-immunity-rule-against-civil-actions-for-conspiracy-and-misfeasance/view
  70. https://www.thejusticegap.com/the-tottenham-3-the-legacy-of-the-broadwater-farm-riot/
  71. https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/from-the-archive-blog/2011/aug/08/anger-tottenham-broadwater-riots-1985
  72. https://www.cabinetmagazine.org/books/duggan/roundtable.php
  73. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/dec/04/ukcrime.rosiecowan
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.