Hubbry Logo
G.992.5G.992.5Main
Open search
G.992.5
Community hub
G.992.5
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
G.992.5
G.992.5
G.992.5
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
G.992.5
Asymmetric digital subscriber line 2 transceivers (ADSL2)- Extended bandwidth ADSL2 (ADSL2plus)
StatusIn force
Year started2003
Latest version3.1
November 2010
OrganizationITU-T
Related standardsG.992.3, G.992.5 Annex M
Domaintelecommunications
LicenseFreely available
Websitewww.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.992.5

G.992.5 (also referred to as ADSL2+, G.dmt.bis+, and G.adslplus)[1] is an ITU-T standard for asymmetric digital subscriber line (ADSL) broadband Internet access. The standard has a maximum theoretical downstream sync speed of 24 megabits per second (Mbit/s). Utilizing G.992.5 Annex M upstream sync speeds of 3.3 Mbit/s can be achieved.

Technical information

[edit]

ADSL2+ extends the capability of basic ADSL by doubling the number of downstream channels. The data rates can be as high as 24 Mbit/s downstream and up to 1.4 Mbit/s upstream depending on the distance from the DSLAM to the customer's premises.

ADSL2+ is capable of doubling the frequency band of typical ADSL connections from 1.1 MHz to 2.2 MHz. This doubles the downstream data rates of the previous ADSL2 standard (which was up to 12 Mbit/s), and like the previous standards will degrade from its peak bitrate after a certain distance.

ADSL2+ also allows port bonding. This is where multiple ports are physically provisioned to the end user and the total bandwidth is equal to the sum of all provisioned ports. So if 2 lines capable of 24 Mbit/s were bonded the result would be a connection capable of 48 Mbit/s download and twice the original upload speed. Not all DSLAM vendors have implemented this functionality. ADSL2+ port bonding is also known as G.998.x or G.Bond.

ITU-T Spec Description
G.998.1 ATM-based multi-pair bonding: A method for bonding of multiple DSL lines to transport an ATM payload beyond the rate/reach capability of a single DSL loop. This protocol allows the bonding of 2 to 32 pairs and supports dynamic removal and restoration of pairs without human intervention.
G.998.2 Ethernet-based multi-pair bonding: Provides a method for bonding of multiple DSL lines for Ethernet transport. This recommendation builds on the IEEE 802.3ah-2004 methods and extends Ethernet transport over other xDSL technologies, including ADSL.
G.998.3 Multi-pair bonding using time-division inverse multiplexing: Details a method for bonding DSL lines using time-division inverse multiplexing (TDIM). This recommendation uses IEEE 802.3ah handshake for pair discovery, parameter negotiation, and setup. It also allows the hitless addition and removal of pairs and the fast removal of a pair upon pair failure.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

G.992.5

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
G.992.5 is an Recommendation that defines the specifications for asymmetric 2 (ADSL2) transceivers with extended bandwidth, commonly referred to as ADSL2+, enabling higher-speed access over existing lines. Published initially in May 2003 and revised through multiple amendments up to January 2009, G.992.5 builds upon the foundational ADSL2 standard (ITU-T G.992.3) by doubling the usable downstream frequency spectrum from 1.1 MHz to 2.2 MHz, which supports theoretical maximum downstream data rates of up to 24 Mbit/s and upstream rates of up to 3.5 Mbit/s under optimal conditions. Key features include improved power management for better reach and stability, seamless rate adaptation to line conditions, and optional annexes such as Annex A for integration with (POTS) environments and Annex M for enhanced upstream performance by reallocating spectrum bands. This standard has been widely adopted for delivering internet, , and other data services, particularly in regions with extensive legacy infrastructure, though its performance diminishes with loop lengths exceeding 5 km.

Overview

Introduction

G.992.5 is the ITU-T Recommendation defining Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line 2 (ADSL2) transceivers with extended bandwidth, commonly referred to as ADSL2+, and was originally published in May 2003. This standard specifies the technical requirements for delivering services over existing twisted-pair lines, building on prior ADSL technologies to support enhanced performance in (DSL) deployments. The primary purpose of G.992.5 is to facilitate high-speed while preserving compatibility with conventional (POTS), ensuring that data transmission does not interfere with voice communications on the same line. By leveraging the unused frequency spectrum above the voice band, it enables asymmetric data rates, where downstream speeds from the network to the user are prioritized over upstream speeds, aligning with typical internet usage patterns dominated by content consumption. In scope, G.992.5 addresses transceiver specifications for both central office (CO) equipment at the service provider's end and customer premises equipment (CPE) at the user's location, focusing on reliable asymmetric transmission across metallic twisted-pair loops. At its core, the architecture relies on discrete multi-tone (DMT) modulation, which allocates orthogonal subcarriers to separate downstream and upstream channels by frequency, optimizing signal integrity and mitigating noise in the copper medium. This extends the framework of G.992.3 (ADSL2) by effectively doubling the downstream bandwidth availability.

Key Features

G.992.5 extends the downstream bandwidth from 1.1 MHz to 2.2 MHz compared to previous standards, utilizing up to 512 discrete multi-tone (DMT) subcarriers to achieve theoretical maximum synchronization speeds of up to 24 Mbit/s downstream and up to 3.3 Mbit/s upstream (with Annex M). A key enhancement is support for seamless rate adaptation (SRA), which allows transceivers to dynamically adjust data rates in response to varying line conditions, such as noise or temperature changes, without interrupting the ongoing connection or requiring retraining. This feature, inherited from G.992.3 alongside options like dual latency paths, improves stability and in real-world deployments. The standard introduces states to optimize energy use: L0 for full operational mode, L2 for low-power idle with reduced transmit power (typically 10-30 dB below L0), and L3 for complete idle shutdown, enabling significant reductions in consumption during periods of low activity. An optional all-digital mode, defined in Annex J, eliminates analog voice signal constraints, providing improved noise immunity and spectral compatibility in fully digital loop environments without (POTS). G.992.5 is compatible with G.998.4 (G.inp), which adds impulse noise protection through retransmission mechanisms, enhancing reliability against short bursts of interference like those from electrical devices or radio signals without sacrificing net throughput.

History and Development

Standardization Process

The development of Recommendation G.992.5 began in 2002 within Study Group 15, specifically under Question 2/15, as an extension to the existing G.992.3 standard for transceivers. This effort addressed the need to enhance downstream bandwidth capabilities in response to increasing demands for higher-speed access following the expansion of usage after the early 2000s. The initial recommendation was approved and published in May 2003, with early drafts reflecting collaborative input from industry stakeholders to overcome limitations in existing deployments. Key contributors included major operators and equipment vendors who participated in the technical discussions to ensure practical implementation and compatibility with legacy infrastructure. Their involvement helped shape the standard's focus on extended bandwidth features while maintaining across diverse network environments. The process emphasized input from global telecom entities to align with real-world deployment challenges, including and power efficiency. A was formally approved on , 2005, by Study Group 15 using the Alternative Approval Process (AAP) under Recommendation A.8. This approval followed iterative reviews during meetings in 2004 and 2005, culminating in the publication that integrated prior amendments from the 2003 version. The standardization aimed to promote global , with parallel efforts in forums like the DSL Forum (now Broadband Forum), which developed test plans to verify compliance and multi-vendor compatibility.

Amendments and Revisions

The initial 2003 version of Recommendation G.992.5 underwent amendments in , including Amendment 1 ( ) adding Annexes J and M, Amendment 2 (June ) updating coordination mechanisms, and a corrigendum ( ). Following the revised publication in January 2005, the standard underwent several further amendments to refine its specifications for (ADSL) transceivers, addressing implementation challenges and enhancing performance. Amendment 1, approved in July 2005, introduced improvements to test parameter accuracy and modifications to Annex K regarding transport protocol specific transmission convergence (TPS-TC) functional descriptions, aligning them with updates from G.992.3. These changes aimed to ensure more precise for extended bandwidth ADSL2 (ADSL2plus) systems. Amendment 2, approved in June 2006, specified coordination mechanisms between radiotelephony and integration, updating relevant clauses such as 8.9 and K to support seamless in mixed telephony environments. Amendment 3, approved in December 2006, enhanced requirements for impulse noise protection (INP), including provisions for achieving higher net data rates while meeting minimum INP thresholds, along with optional time-related additions in clause 8 and refined delay specifications. These updates improved resilience against transient noise in practical deployments. Amendment 4, approved in July 2007, provided a formal definition of power cutback mechanisms to enhance spectral compatibility, including adjustments for upstream and downstream power levels to reduce interference with other services. Amendment 5, approved in June 2008, added functionalities such as erasure decoding and an impulse noise monitor to further bolster error handling and diagnostics. Corrigendum 1, approved in 2010, corrected errors in upstream optional D0 values and minor inconsistencies in tables, ensuring accurate parameter encoding for optional upstream configurations. The latest in-force consolidated version, G.992.5 (01/2009) with version 3.1 incorporating all amendments and the corrigendum up to 2010, remains the current reference for ADSL2plus implementations as of 2025.

Technical Specifications

Physical Layer and Modulation

The physical layer of G.992.5 employs discrete multi-tone (DMT) modulation based on (OFDM) principles to transmit data over twisted-pair copper lines. This approach divides the available spectrum into multiple narrowband subcarriers, each modulated independently to adapt to varying channel conditions such as noise and attenuation. Unlike its predecessor G.992.1, which uses 256 subcarriers, G.992.5 extends the downstream spectrum by employing up to 512 subcarriers, enabling higher data rates while maintaining compatibility with existing infrastructure. A key aspect of the modulation is the bit-loading algorithm, which adaptively allocates between 0 and 15 bits per subcarrier depending on the (SNR) measured for each tone during initialization and ongoing diagnostics. This water-filling-like technique maximizes throughput by loading more bits onto subcarriers with favorable SNR and fewer (or none) onto impaired ones, with adjustments facilitated by seamless rate adaptation (SRA). To enhance reliability, Reed-Solomon (FEC) is applied across the multi-tone symbols, adding parity octets that allow recovery from burst errors without retransmission. The frame structure organizes data into superframes comprising multiple DMT symbols, supporting dual latency paths: a fast path for low-delay applications (e.g., ) and an interleaved path for error-prone environments. The fast path transmits data with minimal buffering, achieving latencies on the order of a single DMT symbol duration (~256 μs), while the interleaved path spreads data across several symbols (up to 256 in a superframe) to enable deeper FEC and impulse noise protection, trading higher latency for robustness. Synchronization and mitigation of inter-symbol interference (ISI) are achieved through dedicated pilot tones and cyclic prefixes. Pilot tones, fixed unmodulated subcarriers (e.g., tone 64 in upstream), provide reference signals for carrier frequency recovery, timing synchronization, and channel estimation at the receiver. Cyclic prefixes prepend a repetition of the end of each DMT symbol to the beginning, typically comprising 16 to 88 samples (about 8% of the symbol length), ensuring orthogonality among subcarriers and absorbing multipath echoes from line reflections. The subcarrier spacing Δf\Delta f is derived from the inverse of the useful symbol period TuT_u, which represents the duration over which the inverse (IDFT) operates without the prefix: Δf=1Tu\Delta f = \frac{1}{T_u} For G.992.5, the sampling fs=2.208f_s = 2.208 MHz and IDFT N=512N = 512 for downstream yield Tu=N/fs≈231.88T_u = N / f_s \approx 231.88 μs, resulting in Δf=4.3125\Delta f = 4.3125 kHz per subcarrier. This spacing ensures the subcarriers are orthogonal over TuT_u, preventing inter-carrier interference, while the total symbol period Ts=Tu+TgT_s = T_u + T_g (with TgT_g) varies from approximately 246 μs to 320 μs depending on the cyclic prefix length, nominally aligning with a of about 4000 symbols per second.

Frequency Bands and Spectrum Management

G.992.5 allocates the downstream frequency band from 138 kHz to 2208 kHz, extending the upper limit beyond the 1104 kHz ceiling of its predecessor G.992.3 to enable doubled downstream capacity while maintaining compatibility with existing twisted-pair . The upstream band spans 25 kHz to 138 kHz, ensuring asymmetrical transmission optimized for patterns. These bands are divided using discrete multi-tone (DMT) modulation, which partitions the spectrum into orthogonal subcarriers for efficient signal encoding. Guard bands provide separation between the signals and the plain old telephone service (POTS) voice band (0-4 kHz), typically with 10-20 kHz of unused spectrum to minimize interference and allow for filter . This design protects voice communications by attenuating DSL energy in the low-frequency stopband below 138 kHz, where the upstream signal also rolls off sharply to avoid overlap with POTS. in G.992.5 incorporates classes such as seamless rate adaptation (SRA), which enables dynamic adjustment of data rates without service interruption in response to varying line conditions. Power backoff mechanisms reduce transmit power in dense binder groups—bundles of 25 or more twisted pairs—to mitigate far-end () and near-end (NEXT), thereby improving overall binder performance. These strategies rely on models that account for and NEXT contributions, addressed through the of DMT subcarriers. Power spectral density (PSD) masks enforce limits to ensure , with downstream PSD capped at -50 dBm/Hz in the to prevent excessive and interference with other services. Optional is supported in bands, such as 1.8-2.0 MHz, to suppress DSL emissions and reduce mutual interference with ham radio operations.

Data Rates and Performance Characteristics

G.992.5 enables asymmetric data transmission with maximum net downstream rates reaching 24 Mbit/s and upstream rates up to 1.4 Mbit/s in standard operation (Annex A) or up to 3.3 Mbit/s with Annex M under optimal conditions, with upstream rates adjustable in increments of 32 kbit/s granularity. These rates are achieved through discrete multi-tone (DMT) modulation across extended frequency bands, where performance varies significantly with loop length and . On 26 AWG twisted-pair wire, the downstream rate typically attains 24 Mbit/s for loops under 1 km, but degrades to approximately 1 Mbit/s at 6 km due to increased signal and susceptibility. Key performance factors include line , which averages about 1.5 dB per 100 m at 1 MHz for typical 26 AWG loops, leading to substantial signal loss over distance. Systems target noise margins of 6-10 dB to ensure reliable operation against and impulse noise, with overall loop reach extending up to 6.5 km for lower data rates while maintaining stability. The maximum downstream rate can be approximated using the Shannon capacity formula adapted for DMT modulation: Rdown≈4314×log⁡2(1+SNR)×NsubcarriersR_\text{down} \approx 4314 \times \log_2(1 + \text{SNR}) \times N_\text{subcarriers} where RdownR_\text{down} is in kbit/s, SNR is the signal-to-noise ratio per subcarrier bin in linear scale, and N≈479N \approx 479 represents the active downstream subcarriers in the extended configuration; actual rates account for variable SNR across bins and overhead. For enhanced capacity, G.992.5 supports line bonding per G.998.1, allowing aggregation across multiple lines to achieve up to 48 Mbit/s downstream with two bonded pairs, effectively doubling performance on parallel loops while managing differential delays.

Annexes and Operational Modes

Annex A and Annex B

Annex A of the G.992.5 standard specifies the operational requirements for asymmetric digital subscriber line (ADSL) transceivers in environments supporting plain old telephone service (POTS), ensuring coexistence with analog voice communications in the 0-4 kHz band. The upstream and downstream power spectral density (PSD) masks are designed to minimize interference with the voice band, with the upstream PSD mask limiting emissions below 25.875 kHz and shaping the spectrum up to 138 kHz to avoid overlap. Downstream transmission utilizes the full extended bandwidth up to 2.2 MHz (2208 kHz), enabling higher data rates while maintaining POTS compatibility. A mandatory POTS splitter is required at the customer premises equipment (CPE) to isolate the DSL signal from the voice service, preventing crosstalk and ensuring reliable operation. Annex A is typically used in POTS environments (e.g., North America). Annex B addresses deployment over integrated services digital network (ISDN) lines, adapting the spectrum allocation to coexist with ISDN signaling, which occupies approximately 4-80 kHz for voice and . The upstream frequency band extends up to 276 kHz (split point), with the PSD mask suppressing power in lower frequencies to mitigate interference with ISDN 2B1Q or 4B3T modulation schemes. Like Annex A, downstream extends to the full 2.2 MHz bandwidth for enhanced performance. An ISDN splitter may be used at the CPE, though often optional due to ISDN's digital nature providing some tolerance to DSL interference compared to analog POTS. Additionally, the PSD masks in Annex B incorporate notes on compatibility with carrierless amplitude/phase modulation (CAP) ADSL systems, facilitating mixed deployments in legacy ISDN networks. Annex B is commonly used in ISDN-heavy regions (e.g., ). Both Annex A and Annex B share core features that support the extended bandwidth of ADSL2+ while prioritizing mixed-service line stability, including non-overlapped or overlapped options based on deployment needs. They ensure backward interoperability with earlier G.992.1 and G.992.2 equipment through the standardized handshaking procedure defined in G.994.1, allowing transceivers to negotiate compatible modes during initialization. These annexes thus enable reliable DSL operation in traditional infrastructures without disrupting existing voice services.

Annex J and All-Digital Mode

Annex J of the G.992.5 recommendation defines the all-digital mode (ADM) for transceivers, enabling operation on loops dedicated exclusively to digital services without analog voice transmission. This mode is particularly suited for deployments where (POTS) is absent, allowing the full exploitation of the copper spectrum for data while enhancing compatibility with coexisting over ISDN systems. By removing voice-related constraints, Annex J facilitates simpler installations and improved performance in pure data environments. A core feature of Annex J is the use of an extended upstream frequency band spanning 25 kHz to 276 kHz (compared to the standard 138 kHz limit in Annex A/B), paired with a comprehensive downstream band up to 2208 kHz, which avoids the need for analog filters typically required to separate voice and data signals. (PSD) masks are specified to limit interference, with upstream PSD peaking at -46.5 dBm/Hz without POTS protection and downstream PSD levels adjusted to -36.5 dBm/Hz in the primary band. These parameters ensure spectral compatibility, limiting degradation to less than 13% for downstream in mixed environments with symmetric high-speed DSL (SHDSL). The all-digital mode eliminates the necessity for POTS splitters at customer premises, reducing equipment costs and installation complexity for service providers. This configuration avoids in the voice band (below approximately 4 kHz), enabling higher margins and potentially supporting data rate increases of up to 20% on short loops through minimized interference. Key operational parameters include an optional extension of the D1 downstream sub-band for further bandwidth optimization and PSD limits calibrated for digital loop technology (DLT) implementations at the central office, promoting efficient in all-digital networks.

Annex M and Extended Upstream

Annex M is an optional operational mode defined in ITU-T Recommendation G.992.5 for ADSL2+ transceivers operating over (POTS) lines, designed to enhance upstream capacity by reallocating a portion of the lower frequency spectrum traditionally used for downstream transmission. In this mode, the upstream frequency band is extended from the standard range of 25 kHz to 138 kHz up to 25 kHz to 276 kHz, effectively doubling the available upstream bandwidth and enabling net data rates of up to 3.3 Mbit/s under optimal line conditions. This reallocation shifts the downstream frequency split to begin at 276 kHz and extend up to 2208 kHz, allowing the system to prioritize upload-intensive applications such as (VoIP) while maintaining overall compatibility with POTS signaling. Implementation of Annex M requires support from both the central office (CO) digital subscriber line access multiplexer (DSLAM) and the customer premises equipment (CPE) transceiver, with mode negotiation occurring during the initialization handshaking process as specified in ITU-T G.994.1. It is compatible with Annex A and Annex B configurations, as well as Annex J for all-digital mode, provided both ends of the link agree on the extended upstream parameters through parameter exchange. The upstream spectrum shaping in Annex M follows similar principles to those in G.992.3 Annex M, ensuring controlled power spectral density to mitigate interference. The primary trade-off in Annex M is a modest reduction in downstream capacity, typically around 10-20% compared to standard ADSL2+ modes, due to the reassignment of the lower subcarriers (approximately tones 7-12) from downstream to upstream use. This exchange provides roughly twice the upstream throughput relative to the core G.992.5 specification's limit of about 1.3 Mbit/s, making it suitable for scenarios requiring more balanced or upload-heavy traffic patterns without necessitating a full to symmetric technologies.

Comparisons and Applications

Differences from Predecessor Standards

G.992.5, commonly known as , builds upon the foundational standard G.992.1 by significantly expanding the downstream bandwidth through an extension of the frequency spectrum up to 2.2 MHz, enabling maximum downstream data rates of 24 Mbit/s compared to the 8 Mbit/s limit of G.992.1. This improvement leverages additional discrete multi-tone (DMT) subcarriers to achieve higher throughput while maintaining with existing infrastructure. Additionally, G.992.5 introduces Seamless Rate Adaptation (SRA), a feature absent in G.992.1, which allows dynamic rate adjustments in response to line conditions without interrupting the connection, thereby enhancing stability and efficiency. Relative to G.992.3 (ADSL2), G.992.5 primarily differentiates itself by doubling the downstream frequency range from 1.104 MHz to 2.208 MHz—particularly in Annex A and Annex M configurations—resulting in the potential for 24 Mbit/s downstream rates versus the 12 Mbit/s of G.992.3. It inherits core features from G.992.3, such as states (L0 to L3) for reduced and Impulse Noise Protection (INP) to mitigate short-duration noise events, but enhances these through optimized interleaving and margin allocation for better performance over extended loops. These refinements support more robust operation in noisy environments without requiring retraining. In comparison to G.992.2 ( Lite or G.lite), which prioritizes simplicity with a maximum downstream rate of 1.5 Mbit/s and splitterless deployment, G.992.5 delivers vastly superior performance at up to 24 Mbit/s downstream while retaining the full-rate complexity and spectral requirements of earlier full implementations, including POTS compatibility. This shift emphasizes higher-speed access over ease of installation, catering to evolving demands for multimedia services. Overall, G.992.5 advances the lineage by prioritizing scalability in downstream capacity, incorporating shared DMT modulation principles across predecessors, and serving as a transitional standard toward higher-frequency technologies like for future-proofing deployments.

Integration with Bonding and Higher-Speed Technologies

G.992.5 transceivers support port through Recommendations G.998.1 and G.998.2, enabling the aggregation of multiple ADSL2+ lines to enhance overall bandwidth capacity. G.998.1 specifies -based multi-pair bonding, which combines the payloads from several DSL lines into a single higher-rate stream, allowing operators to exceed the rate limitations of individual loops. Similarly, G.998.2 defines Ethernet-based multi-pair bonding, facilitating the distribution of Ethernet frames across bonded DSL links for more efficient transport in IP-centric networks. By aggregating up to four or more ADSL2+ lines, each capable of downstream rates around 24 Mbit/s, these mechanisms can achieve combined speeds approaching 100 Mbit/s, providing scalable upgrades without replacing existing copper infrastructure. G.992.5 also integrates with higher-speed technologies like , as defined in G.993.1 and G.993.2, through multimode transceiver support that permits fallback to ADSL2+ operation in mixed deployments. In hybrid central office (CO) configurations, can serve shorter loops for ultra-high speeds, while G.992.5 acts as an overlay for longer reaches where signal limits performance, ensuring broader coverage without full network overhauls. This compatibility allows seamless transitions or dual-mode operation, where equipment automatically selects the optimal standard based on line conditions. These integration features find applications in residential and business services, particularly where enables small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to achieve rates exceeding 24 Mbit/s over existing pairs, avoiding the costs of deployment. For instance, SMEs can use bonded ADSL2+ lines to support data-intensive tasks like access or video conferencing without service disruptions. Limitations of include the need for multiple provisioned pairs and specialized (CPE) capable of handling aggregated traffic, with G.bond standards supporting a maximum of 32 pairs to manage and latency challenges.

References

  1. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.992.5
  2. https://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?lang=e&id=T-REC-G.992.5-200501-S!!PDF-E&type=items
  3. https://www.broadband-forum.org/pdfs/tr-105-2-0-0.pdf
  4. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/102800_102899/102804/01.01.01_60/ts_102804v010101p.pdf
  5. https://www.imda.gov.sg/-/media/imda/files/regulation-licensing-and-consultations/ict-standards/telecommunication-standards/line/ida-ts-adsl-i2.pdf
  6. https://docdb.cept.org/download/388
  7. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.992.5/en
  8. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4706
  9. https://www.broadband-forum.org/pdfs/mr-180-1-0-0.pdf
  10. https://www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com15/sg15-q2.html
  11. https://www.itu.int/itu-t/recommendations/rec.aspx?rec=6279&lang=en
  12. https://digital-library.theiet.org/doi/pdf/10.1049/ce%253A20040304
  13. https://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?lang=e&id=T-REC-G.992.5-200501-S%21%21PDF-E&type=items
  14. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.992.5-200507-S!Amd1/en
  15. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.992.5-200606-S!Amd2/en
  16. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.992.5-200612-S!Amd3/en
  17. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.992.5-200707-S!Amd4/en
  18. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.992.5-200806-S!Amd5/en
  19. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.992.5-201011-I!Cor1/en
  20. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.992.5-200901-I/en
  21. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Digital_subscriber_line_(DSL)
  22. https://www.iol.unh.edu/sites/default/files/knowledgebase/dsl/ADSL_Tutorial.pdf
  23. http://www.arrl.org/dsl-interference
  24. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_tr/101800_101899/10183002/01.02.01_60/tr_10183002v010201p.pdf
  25. https://cwmp-data-models.broadband-forum.org/tr-181-2-13-0-cwmp.html
  26. https://www.increasebroadbandspeed.co.uk/2012/graph-ADSL-speed-versus-distance
  27. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781118878774.ch07
  28. https://resources.pcb.cadence.com/blog/2020-adsl-noise-margin-values-and-effects-of-other-characteristic-parameters-on-functionality
  29. https://www.versatek.com/the-11-most-frequently-asked-questions-about-adsl2-adsl2-answered/
  30. https://cioffi-group.stanford.edu/doc/book/chap4.pdf
  31. https://www.design-reuse.com/news/202509790-aware-announces-adoption-of-its-stratiphy-bonded-adsl2-technology/
  32. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/101900_101999/10195201/01.01.01_60/ts_10195201v010101p.pdf
  33. https://sintef.brage.unit.no/sintef-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2387905/SINTEF%2BA1211.pdf?sequence=3
  34. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/101900_101999/10195203/01.01.01_60/ts_10195203v010101p.pdf
  35. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/887-integrated-services-router-isr/data_sheet_c78_459542.html
  36. https://www.broadband-forum.org/pdfs/tr-100-1-0-0.pdf
  37. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.992.5-200404-S!Amd1
  38. https://www.ieee802.org/3/efm/public/nov02/copper/artman_copper_1_1102.pdf
  39. https://www.itu.int/ITU-T/worksem/asna/presentations/Session_6/asna_0604_s6_p4_palm.pdf
  40. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.998.2-201811-I!!PDF-E&type=items
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.