Hubbry Logo
British Home StoresBritish Home StoresMain
Open search
British Home Stores
Community hub
British Home Stores
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
British Home Stores
British Home Stores
British Home Stores
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

British Home Stores (BHS) is a British-founded Emirati department store retailer that primarily sells clothing and household items. It was established as a variety store in 1928 by a group of American entrepreneurs, and grew to be one of the UK's largest department store chains which traded until 2016.

Key Information

In May 2000, the retailer was purchased by Sir Philip Green and taken private.[1] The company later became part of Green's Arcadia Group in 2009. In March 2015, the retailer was sold to the Retail Acquisitions Ltd consortium for the nominal sum of £1, following sustained losses.[2] In April 2016, British Home Stores entered administration, and the final 22 UK stores closed on 28 August 2016.[3]

In September 2016, BHS.com was relaunched for the UK market by the Al Maya Group, based in Qatar (now based in Dubai), who had purchased the British Home Stores intellectual property from the administrators, and continued to operate physical BHS stores across the Middle East, Africa and other parts of Europe, for a time.[4][5] In June 2018, Al Maya Group closed BHS.com to focus on other interests.[6] In October 2018, BHS.com was relaunched again by the Manchester-based firm Litecraft Group Ltd, using the BHS brand under license from Al Maya Group, to mainly sell their range of lighting products.[7]

As of June 2025, Al Maya Group operates one final surviving physical British Home Stores location at the Landmark Mall in Doha, Qatar.[8]

History

[edit]

Origins

[edit]

British Home Stores was founded in 1928 by a group of U.S. entrepreneurs[9] who wanted to follow the successful model set by Woolworths. They did not want go into direct competition with Woolworths, so set their highest price at a shilling. The first store opened in Brixton,[9] and by 1929 the price limit had been lifted to five shillings to allow the business to offer more goods.[10]

The business expanded by opening further branches, all offering small cafeterias and grocery departments, and in 1933 the business went public.[10] After the war, the business continued to grow, and by the end of the 1960s had 94 stores nationwide.[10]

Expansion

[edit]
A BHS branch in pre-1995 branding seen in Darlington in 2009

The company expanded in the 1970s and 1980s, and was a member of the FTSE 100 when that index was launched in 1984.[11] Stores were opened in the developing wave of indoor shopping centres, such as Broadway Shopping Centre and Lakeside Shopping Centre. A joint venture was launched with supermarket retailer Sainsbury's to create hypermarkets using the SavaCentre brand;[12] Sainsbury's took full control of SavaCentre in 1989, and later converted the stores to the Sainsbury's branding.

A downturn in business in the early 1980s was countered with a revamp of the stores and the selling of goods with higher profit margins. The company closed its only overseas store, in Dublin, Ireland, during this time (although there was a rapidly aborted re-entry in 1996 via a franchise store in Dublin's Jervis Centre). In 1985, the first overseas franchise store opened in Gibraltar.[13] Such stores, not directly owned by the BHS company but supplied with BHS products, have operated in several places in Europe and the Middle East.[14] The Tammy brand was available as a separate franchise.[citation needed]

In its stores, BHS sold a mixture of basic electricals based primarily on kitchen products such as kettles and toasters. Latterly the range had begun to increase, particularly in the designated Home stores and larger high street branches. Ranges introduced included Breville, Russell Hobbs, De'Longhi and Vax.[15] In addition, BHS began to sell larger electrical items through a separate website, bhsdirect.co.uk. The service was run through a third-party company, Buy it Direct, and was not directly controlled by BHS.[16] This allowed the company to expand its product range to laptops, tablets, and large kitchen appliances such as fridge-freezers, TVs and air-conditioners.

In 1986, BHS merged with Habitat and Mothercare to form Storehouse plc.[9] Soon afterwards, the British Home Stores registered company name and branding across its shops was replaced with "BhS" (later "Bhs", and since reverted to the all-caps "BHS", which the company used in addition to the full British Home Stores name prior to the full rebrand) and a new corporate logo. The exception was in stores that displayed a "historic" fascia, such as that in Edinburgh's Princes Street, which continued to feature the British Home Stores name in its original Roman type etched into the granite shop front.

British Home Stores, like many other major retailers, followed a trend of opening stores at out-of-town locations since the 1980s. One of these was the two-level store at Merry Hill Shopping Centre in the West Midlands (which formed part of an Enterprise Zone). This store opened on 14 November 1989, ultimately replacing the store in nearby Dudley, which closed in June 1990 after a directly related sharp fall in turnover. The nearby West Bromwich store closed around the same time, its fortunes also affected by the Merry Hill development and smaller developments around nearby Oldbury, which had begun with the SavaCentre hypermarket in 1980.[17]

Takeover by Philip Green

[edit]
Logo used from 1995 to 2010
A branch in 1995–2010 branding seen in Wakefield in 2013

In the mid-1990s, the brand saw a further reinvention under guidance from retail design house '20:20'. The new look was showcased with the launch of the "millennium concept" shopfit, initially at the Grafton Centre, Cambridge during 1995. With its softer Bhs "signature" logo and warm interior lighting, the concept attempted with varying degrees of success to meet the needs of the modern, more sophisticated shopper.

In 1995, BHS was the first high street retailer to open a branch in Moscow. The £3 million venture was the largest in the international portfolio and was quickly followed by the opening of a second store in St Petersburg. Further stores opened in Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan in 1998, and there were stores in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Dubai, Oman, Qatar, Bahrain and Abu Dhabi. By 2000 the chain also had stores in Greece, Tenerife, Gibraltar, Malta and the Far East.

During the late 1990s, the stores which formed Storehouse Plc fell on hard times; BHS and Mothercare were the worst affected. Following a number of years of tough trading, Philip Green bought BHS from Storehouse Plc in May 2000 for £200 million. He then changed the company from public (Plc) to private (Ltd). In 2002, Green went on to acquire the Arcadia Group of high street retailers, which included Topshop, Burton, Evans, Dorothy Perkins and Wallis among others, to form Britain's second largest clothes retailer, after Marks and Spencer.[18] Alan Smith, chairman of Storehouse at the time of the Bhs sale, commented, "He [Philip Green] had a crystal-clear vision and strategy. He had the guts to do the deal, to make it work when nobody else thought he could."[19]

In early 2006 a new franchise, "Bhs Kids", was launched in the Middle East, carrying many best-selling children's lines from BHS stores.

Return to British Home Stores

[edit]

In May 2005, Green, owner of BHS, purchased Etam UK from its French owner, Etam Développement.[20] The Etam UK brands included Etam, Amelie May, and Tammy. The girls' fashion retailer Tammy was the strongest brand in terms of sales and consumer recognition. For this reason, and to help improve girls' perception of BHS as a whole, from September 2005 stand-alone stores were closed and the brand integrated into BHS stores.

A branch in 'British Home Stores' branding in Kirkstall, Leeds

In 2005, BHS resurrected its British Home Stores fascia, more than 20 years after it had disappeared from the UK high street.[21] The move followed the purchase of several former Allders at Home sites from the department store chain. These projects were designed to build upon the success of the homewares and lighting that BHS stores currently offered and to tap into new areas of business such as furniture, curtains, rugs, and wall art. Brands sold included Denby, Maxwell Williams, Typhoon, Brabantia, Terence Conran and Jasper Conran.[citation needed]

In 2005, Green's wife, a Monaco resident, received a £1.2 billion dividend from Arcadia.[22]

On 27 February 2009, it was announced that the company would be integrated into the Arcadia Group. Central support functions were merged and selected BHS stores housed selected Arcadia brands; for example, in July 2009, BHS stores in Solihull in the West Midlands and Bexleyheath in South London[23] both opened Evans and Wallis concessions. In August 2009, the Canterbury branch opened Wallis and Evans concessions within the store. Other stores with Arcadia insertions included Tunbridge Wells, Oxford, Peterborough, Watford, Kilmarnock, Nottingham, Camberley, Norwich and Aberdeen.

Leadership changes

[edit]
Logo used from 2010 to 2015 (2010–2013 variant had no stripe)

Mike Goring was appointed managing director to the chain in May 2009, and in July, Jacquie Gray was appointed Creative Director. In 2010, BHS changed its logo, resurrecting the uppercase form of the abbreviation that had not been used since the Storehouse rebrand and the later rebrand in the 1990s. A new e-commerce website was launched, and a new store design was gradually introduced across the estate.

In 2011, a store in Armenia opened.

Goring left BHS in 2012 to take up the position of Retail Director for Debenhams.[24] After he left, former Marks and Spencer Menswear Trading Director, Richard Price was appointed managing director.[25] Gray left in 2014.

In 2013, a franchised concession opened in the Falkland Islands[citation needed] and a store was opened in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.[26]

In January 2014, it was announced that the chain would sell branded food products; the service was to be trialled in 50 stores with the intention of making this a permanent addition in up to 150 stores.[27] The first of three trial stores opened in Staines in March 2014,[28] and was shortly followed by another in Warrington and a third in Romford.[29]

The company had an independent furniture website, bhsfurniture.co.uk.[30] The stores and website sold a number of leading brands including Italsofa, G Plan, Relyon and Silentnight. Larger homes stores, such as the Barton Square branch in the Trafford Centre, Greater Manchester, also sold the Welle cabinet range and had Sharps showrooms.[31]

In December 2014, New Zealand-based childrenswear brand Pumpkin Patch was introduced into larger stores and online.[32]

In January 2015, Green confirmed that he was considering selling the company following sustained losses, and that he had received a number of approaches.[33]

Sale and restructuring

[edit]

On 12 March 2015, it was announced that BHS had been sold to Retail Acquisitions for a nominal price of £1.[34] It was also confirmed that Richard Price had left his post as managing director for a position with the clothing arm of Tesco; former BHS Chief Operating Officer Darren Topp was confirmed as the interim Chief Executive.[35] Shortly after the takeover, 51 of the company's 171 stores were reported as being under threat of closure.[36]

A branch with post-2015 branding in Lincoln in 2015

In September 2015, BHS owners Retail Acquisitions announced another rebrand, as part of a £60m rejuvenation plan, which resulted in the full British Home Stores name being resurrected on the high street for the first time since 1986. A programme of modernising stores with the new branding was announced, while plans to roll out food halls were to continue.[37]

By early 2016, periodic store closures had seen the company withdraw entirely from several city centres including Bath,[38] Cardiff, Carlisle,[39] Oxford,[38] Reading[40] and Southampton.[41] Plans were also being made to reduce the size of the flagship Oxford Street branch by leasing excess space to other retailers.[42]

In March 2016, the company sought a company voluntary arrangement (CVA) to allow it to restructure the business.[43] As part of its application, it revealed a deficit in its pension scheme of £207 million, and sought to transfer its schemes to the Pension Protection Fund.[44] A consortium led by the banker Nicholas de Scossa was involved in negotiations to buy the company.[45]

Administration

[edit]
BHS on Foregate Street, Chester in July 2016, during their closing down sale

On 24 April 2016, Dominic Chappell (owner of Retail Acquisitions) announced that administrators would be appointed the next day.[46] It was announced that the chain had entered administration on 25 April 2016, putting 11,000 jobs at risk. Duff & Phelps were appointed administrators and sought to sell the business as a going concern. It at this point had debts of £1.3 billion including £571 million in pension liabilities, meaning either individual assets (such as stores) would have to be sold or the chain would be in new ownership. UK sports chain Sports Direct was reported to be in talks to buy a number of BHS stores, but no buyer was found for the company, resulting in the closure of BHS stores. Head office staff were made redundant on the announcement that no buyer had been found, with stores expected to last up to 8 weeks selling the remaining stock.[citation needed]

In July 2016, a committee of the UK parliament issued a report titled "Leadership failures and personal greed led to collapse of BHS".[47] The Guardian reported "Sir Philip Green's reputation ripped apart in damning report on BHS demise. MPs say retailer's former owners subjected it to 'systematic plunder' and describe the collapse as 'unacceptable face of capitalism'".[48]

On 23 July 2016, the administrators Duff and Phelps shut 20 stores, and the next week another 30.[49] Closure of the final outlets was on 28 August 2016.[50] The insolvent part of the company finally went into liquidation on 2 December 2016, with the remainder of winding up proceedings commencing on that date.

[edit]

In June 2024, the High Court ordered two former directors of the company, Lennart Hennington and Dominic Chandler, to pay £18m, made up of £13m for wrongful trading, and £5m for breach of corporate duties. This was as a result of legal action brought by the liquidator on behalf of the creditors. A further hearing is due in June 2024, at which a final decision will be made on the total amount to be paid by the two men.[51]

Legacy

[edit]

Middle East, Africa and European operations

[edit]

Upon closure of the UK stores, Al Mana Group still traded international BHS stores across the Middle East, Africa and Europe. As of June 2025, one final BHS store trades in Qatar.[52]

BHS.com relaunch

[edit]
BHS customers queue during a closing down sale at Wood Green, London

The Qatari Al Maya Group purchased the company's international franchise stores and online operations in June 2016.[53] The group formed a new business, BHS International (UK) Limited, based in London. It launched a website, bhs.com, under the new brand name "The British Home Store" in September 2016.[54] Al Maya announced that the website would close by 27 June 2018, shifting focus to their international franchise business.[55][56] The bhs.com website has since become operated by Litecraft Group Limited in October 2018, a private company[57] using the BHS logo brand name under licence.[58] The website sells lighting and selected homewares.

The Watford BHS branch sporting new branding, announcing the opening of its Food Store

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

British Home Stores

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

British Home Stores (BHS) was a prominent British chain founded in by a group of American entrepreneurs, who opened the first outlet in Brixton, , emulating the fixed-price model of Woolworth's to offer affordable clothing, home furnishings, and household goods. The retailer expanded rapidly, growing to over 100 stores by the 1930s and establishing itself as a fixture through the post-war era, with a focus on middle-market apparel and domestic products that catered to working-class and suburban consumers. By the late , BHS had become a FTSE 100-listed entity, employing thousands and operating a network of outlets across the . In 2000, BHS was acquired by retail magnate Sir Philip Green for £200 million from Storehouse plc and delisted from the , integrating into his privately held , during which period dividends totaling hundreds of millions were extracted while the company schemes accrued a deepening deficit due to underfunding and demographic pressures. Sold in 2015 for a nominal £1 to Retail Acquisitions Limited, led by former bankrupt despite warnings from regulators, the chain faced accelerated decline from chronic trading losses, burdensome property leases, insufficient store modernization, and loans to related parties that depleted liquidity. The company's administration in April 2016, overseen by administrators from , resulted in the liquidation of 163 stores, the of approximately 11,000 staff, and a £571 million shortfall in its pension funds, prompting parliamentary inquiries that highlighted systemic failures in , risk oversight, and as primary causal factors rather than solely market competition or online retail disruption. These events underscored vulnerabilities in private equity-style ownership transitions and the misalignment of incentives between owners and long-term stakeholder obligations in mature retail operations.

Founding and Early Development

Origins and Establishment

British Home Stores (BHS) was established in by a group of American entrepreneurs aiming to introduce a model akin to F.W. Woolworth & Co. in the . The inaugural store opened in , , with a second following in , targeting affordable retail amid the competitive interwar market dominated by established chains like Woolworth's. The initial emphasized low-cost goods, with no item priced above one in the first year, rising to a maximum of five shillings by to broaden appeal while maintaining volume-driven economies. Stores featured furnishings, , , small grocery sections, and cafeterias, often incorporating early own-label products to control costs and quality. This approach catered primarily to working-class consumers facing post-World War I economic strains, including high and , by leveraging supplier partnerships for bulk discounts without the frills of upscale department stores.

Expansion in the Mid-20th Century

Following the end of , British Home Stores experienced significant growth amid Britain's economic recovery and rising consumer demand for affordable . The company, which operated 58 stores at the end of 1939, rebuilt war-damaged locations and opened new branches to serve expanding urban and suburban populations, reaching 87 stores by 1965. By 1970, this had increased to 94 stores nationwide, employing approximately 12,000 workers. This expansion aligned with demographic changes, including the and suburban migration, alongside higher disposable incomes that fueled demand for fixed-price retailing without haggling. BHS maintained its core fixed-price model, originally capped at low denominations but raised to enable broader home furnishings sales, targeting working-class families seeking value in , , and basic appliances. To facilitate purchases, the retailer partnered with credit providers like Provident for check-trading systems, allowing installment payments on in the 1950s and 1960s, a common adaptation to limited immediate . In 1960, BHS introduced its Prova own-label brand for exclusive products, enhancing margins by reducing reliance on third-party suppliers. During the , diversification into electrical goods and soft furnishings further supported growth, capitalizing on trends and interests without venturing into full departmental variety. By the late , the chain approached 100 stores, reflecting sustained adaptation to rather than structural advantages, though it ceased grocery sales in many locations amid competitive pricing pressures. This period marked BHS's peak pre-1980s physical footprint, driven empirically by and wage increases exceeding inflation in the era.

Corporate Evolution Pre-Green Era

Integration into Larger Groups

In 1986, British Home Stores merged with Habitat Mothercare to form Storehouse plc, creating a diversified retail conglomerate that combined BHS's operations with 's home furnishings and 's maternity and childcare offerings. BHS shareholders retained a 55% stake in the new entity, reflecting the chain's dominant position within the group. This integration marked BHS's shift from an independent retailer to a within a broader corporate structure, centralizing decision-making under Storehouse's management, led initially by , the designer behind Habitat. The merger rebranded the parent company as Storehouse plc amid internal shakeups, including Conran's efforts to modernize BHS by shortening its name to simply "BHS" and attempting to infuse a more fashionable identity, though these changes failed to revitalize the brand's appeal. Storehouse's public listing on the London Stock Exchange exposed the group to shareholder pressures for diversified growth, but this structure diluted operational focus on BHS's core clothing and homeware segments, as resources were allocated across disparate brands. Consequently, BHS experienced reduced autonomy, with strategic priorities subordinated to group-wide objectives, contributing to bureaucratic inefficiencies that hindered agile responses to market shifts. By the late 1980s and 1990s, BHS's performance lagged behind focused peers like , which maintained specialized dominance in apparel and food without conglomerate distractions; Storehouse's BHS division saw sales growth stagnate amid broader group underperformance, exacerbated by the and internal mismanagement. This era's delisting considerations and eventual divestitures underscored how the integration fostered resource dilution, as evidenced by Storehouse's repeated restructuring attempts to address BHS's declining relative to standalone competitors. The conglomerate model prioritized synergies that proved elusive, leading to operational silos and slower adaptation to consumer trends, setting the stage for BHS's later sale in 2000.

Pre-Acquisition Challenges

In the late , British Home Stores encountered intensifying operational difficulties within Storehouse plc, characterized by stagnant sales and eroding profitability amid heightened competition from supermarket chains expanding into apparel and home goods. Discounters such as captured market share in value segments through aggressive pricing and broader product ranges, while shifting consumer preferences favored quality-focused retailers over BHS's mid-market positioning, leading to persistent underperformance. Storehouse's overall sales for divisions including BHS remained flat around £1 billion in the mid-, but by the ending March 1999, the group recorded a pre-tax loss of £15.7 million, with BHS contributing to the downturn through weak trading in clothing and household categories. Earlier turnaround efforts under Storehouse, such as cost reductions implemented in the early , had yielded temporary gains—BHS profits rose 42% to £35 million by 1995 despite flat sales—but these proved unsustainable as competitive pressures mounted and economic conditions softened. The chain's heavy dependence on approximately 170 physical high-street stores exposed it to vulnerabilities in and rent costs, without diversification into emerging channels, though was nascent and not yet transformative for department stores. Boardroom tensions escalated as Storehouse's leadership conducted strategic reviews, revealing irreconcilable performance gaps between units; this culminated in a November 1999 announcement to dissolve the group and split operations, prioritizing divestment of underperforming assets like BHS to stem further losses. These challenges underscored BHS's structural rigidities in a retail landscape increasingly favoring agile, specialized competitors over conglomerate-held generalists.

Acquisition and Operations under Philip Green

Takeover and Initial Turnaround

In May 2000, acquired British Home Stores (BHS) from Storehouse plc for £200 million, taking control of a chain that had been struggling with declining sales and operational inefficiencies under its previous public ownership. The purchase positioned BHS within Green's expanding retail portfolio, which he managed through family-controlled entities like Taveta Investments, though it operated separately from his subsequent acquisition of the in 2002. Green's initial interventions emphasized operational streamlining, including headcount reductions and optimizations, which addressed BHS's pre-acquisition losses estimated at tens of millions annually. These measures, akin to private equity-driven restructurings, restored profitability within the first few years; by , BHS reported pre-tax profits of £120.9 million on revenues of £889.8 million, reflecting a marked turnaround from its loss-making status. This early , acknowledged even in later parliamentary inquiries, demonstrated Green's in reviving a distressed asset through decisive gains rather than immediate asset . Store refurbishments and pricing competitiveness further stabilized market share, with BHS regaining footing against rivals like by offering value-oriented home goods and apparel. These outcomes contrasted with narratives framing the ownership solely as extractive, as the rapid profit recovery evidenced upfront managerial investments in a business that had faced existential threats prior to 2000.

Management Strategies and Performance

Upon acquiring British Home Stores (BHS) in May 2000 for £200 million, Philip Green implemented aggressive cost-cutting measures, including squeezing suppliers and streamlining operations, which drove profitability in the initial years. These tactics, characterized by hands-on oversight from Green—such as direct intervention in merchandising and inventory—enabled annual profits of approximately £100 million through 2004, stabilizing a previously struggling retailer and earning early praise for operational revival. However, this approach prioritized short-term efficiencies over long-term innovation, contributing to stagnant product differentiation amid rising competition from discounters like Primark and department stores like Marks & Spencer. A key operational strategy involved leveraging property assets through sale-and-leaseback transactions to generate immediate for and store refreshes. In 2001, BHS sold ten stores to Carmen Properties Limited—a Jersey-registered entity linked to Green's family—for £106 million, subsequently leasing them back at escalating rents totaling £153 million over the period. While this unlocked without outright divestment, it imposed ongoing rental burdens that eroded margins as property values and lease terms hardened, causal to higher fixed costs in a low-growth environment. BHS under Green maintained a high-street-centric model with limited pivot to , reflecting Green's reported aversion to digital platforms and a focus on physical retail presence. This resistance delayed investment in online capabilities, allowing competitors like Amazon to capture shifting consumer habits toward digital shopping; by the mid-2010s, BHS's had fallen from 13.4% in 2000 to 8.2%. Centralized buying processes, while enabling bulk efficiencies, failed to adapt product ranges swiftly to preferences for value-oriented or fast-fashion alternatives, fostering criticisms of strategic despite defenses of disciplined, top-down control preserving jobs—around 11,000 at peak—during profitable phases. Performance reflected these dynamics: turnover remained largely flat from 2000 through much of the era, peaking artificially in 2009 due to an extended accounting period before declining amid disruption and habitual shifts post-2010. Operating losses emerged by 2013–14, widening to £21 million, with sales dipping 3.5% to £675.7 million in 2013 as margins compressed from unaddressed competitive pressures. Yet, early gains underscored the efficacy of Green's interventionist style in averting immediate decline, sustaining operations across 180 stores through hands-on tactics that retained employment stability until external intensified.

Financial Practices and Dividend Distributions

Capital Extraction Mechanisms

During Philip Green's ownership from 2000 to 2015, British Home Stores (BHS) extracted capital primarily through substantial dividend distributions to its parent entity, Taveta Investments—majority-owned by Lady Tina Green—as well as interest payments on intra-group loans and rental obligations stemming from property transactions with affiliated companies. Between and , when BHS recorded profits, the company distributed £414 million in dividends to shareholders, including Taveta, exceeding the cumulative pre-tax profits of approximately £207 million over those years. These payouts were facilitated by BHS's improved operational performance post-acquisition, following Green's £200 million purchase that addressed prior losses and inefficiencies. Additional extraction occurred via intra-group financing, where BHS incurred loans from Taveta and other Green-controlled entities, generating outward interest payments that contributed to the overall £584 million in combined dividends, loan interest, and rents repatriated to the Green family over the 15-year period. Property-related mechanisms further enabled cash outflows: BHS divested freehold properties to related parties, often leasing them back at elevated rents, which provided upfront liquidity but imposed recurring expenses that strained future cash flows amid declining retail performance. These proceeds supported broader expansions, such as acquisitions and refinancing, while also accruing to personal wealth held tax-efficiently through Lady Green's residency. The practices sparked debate on their sustainability and equity. The UK Parliament's , Innovation and Skills, and Work and Pensions Committees characterized the extractions as "systematic plunder," asserting they prioritized short-term family enrichment over long-term resilience, leaving BHS undercapitalized for market shifts. In contrast, maintained that the dividends represented rightful compensation for the risks and capital injected to revive a failing retailer—evidenced by early profitability payouts under legal standards requiring distributable profits—and aligned with conventional private ownership models where owners repatriate returns rather than retain excess in underperforming subsidiaries. Empirically, the extractions correlated with BHS's profitable phase but preceded sustained losses from onward, raising questions about whether they depleted reserves needed for adaptation, though Green's defenders noted similar dividend policies in comparable retail turnarounds without subsequent .

Pension Contributions and Liabilities

The British Home Stores (BHS) maintained a defined-benefit pension scheme that provided retirement benefits to approximately 20,000 members, encompassing active employees, deferred pensioners, and retirees. Acquired by in May 2000 when the scheme held a surplus, the fund's liabilities began accumulating deficits in the ensuing years due to a confluence of factors including volatile returns, extended periods of low gilt yields that elevated present-value calculations of future payouts, and restrained contributions. Under Green's stewardship through to the March 2015 sale, BHS curtailed contributions to safeguard liquidity for core retail operations amid intensifying sector competition and thinning margins, a tactic aligned with actuarial evaluations highlighting the scheme's sensitivity to constraints in defined-benefit structures. This approach, while deferring funding obligations, amplified vulnerabilities inherent to such schemes, where liabilities are predicated on long-term actuarial assumptions regarding , , and discount rates; by fiscal year-end 2015, the deficit stood at £345 million, ballooning to £571 million on an estimated basis by April 2016 administration amid further declines in bond yields that diminished projected asset yields relative to obligations. In February 2017, furnished a voluntary £363 million cash infusion to trustees, enabling reconfiguration into a self-contained entity that afforded members—numbering around 19,000—pensions approximating original accrued levels without full transfer to the Pension Protection Fund, which would have imposed haircuts on entitlements; this settlement, calibrated against prevailing actuarial metrics, averted deeper shortfalls while falling short of the headline deficit figure, serving as a negotiated closure rather than acknowledgment of fault.

Sale and Path to Collapse

Transfer to Retail Acquisitions

In March 2015, British Home Stores (BHS) was sold by Taveta Investments, under Sir Philip Green's control, to Retail Acquisitions Limited (RAL), a newly formed investment vehicle led by , for a nominal £1. The transaction, announced on March 11, 2015, transferred ownership of BHS's 163 stores and its operations to RAL, which assumed responsibility for the company's substantial pension schemes carrying deficits estimated at around £200 million at the time, though these liabilities persisted post-sale. Chappell, a former Formula 3000 racing driver and serial entrepreneur with a history of personal bankruptcies, lacked any substantive retail sector experience, raising immediate concerns about the consortium's capacity to manage a struggling retailer reporting annual losses exceeding £20 million. RAL's backers included private equity elements, but the group's limited track record in high-street operations was flagged by observers as a mismatch for BHS's challenges, including outdated stores and competitive pressures from online retail. The Pensions Regulator's subsequent investigation determined that Green's principal aim in offloading BHS was to extricate Taveta from escalating obligations, which had been inadequately addressed under prior ownership through mechanisms like a 23-year recovery plan criticized for deferring contributions. RAL did not negotiate alterations to the terms during the , effectively inheriting the schemes without injecting fresh capital to bolster them, a move Chappell later defended by asserting that deficits were a legacy issue outside the buyer's core remit. Critics, including parliamentary inquiries, decried the deal as a distressed fire-sale to an unqualified bidder, prioritizing Green's liability avoidance over sustainable continuity and potentially hastening BHS's vulnerability. In contrast, Chappell positioned the acquisition as a genuine private rescue bid, claiming personal investment and turnaround intentions to avert immediate , though RAL's subsequent actions, such as property-related loans totaling millions, fueled skepticism about its strategic bona fides.

Operational Decline Factors

BHS's operational challenges intensified due to its limited adaptation to the surge in , as the retailer maintained an underdeveloped online presence that failed to capture shifting preferences toward digital platforms. By the mid-2010s, competitors like Amazon and had captured significant market share through seamless online experiences, while BHS's website remained rudimentary and underinvested, contributing to stagnant sales growth in non-physical channels. The retailer faced mounting pressure from discounters such as and budget chains like and , which offered lower-priced alternatives in and , eroding BHS's positioning in a price-sensitive market. Its fashion and homeware ranges increasingly appeared dated, alienating younger shoppers and resulting in declining footfall; high street visits fell by 3.9% in early 2016 amid broader retail contraction. Legacy high fixed costs, particularly from long-term leases on expensive properties, strained cash flows as revenue per store diminished without corresponding cost reductions. These structural burdens mirrored vulnerabilities across department store chains, where over-reliance on physical retail amid rising business rates and maintenance expenses amplified losses; BHS recorded pre-tax deficits exceeding £90 million annually by fiscal year 2015, underscoring systemic pressures rather than isolated operational missteps.

Administration and Immediate Aftermath

Insolvency Proceedings

On 25 April 2016, British Home Stores (BHS), owned by Retail Acquisitions Limited (RAL), filed for administration amid mounting debts exceeding £1.3 billion, including a £571 million scheme deficit. Administrators from Duff & Phelps were appointed to oversee the process, with the immediate priority of stabilizing operations by keeping the 163 stores open for trading while seeking potential buyers or investors to rescue the business. This procedural step under the Act 1986 aimed to protect creditor interests and explore restructuring options, though initial rescue talks with parties including Sports Direct had collapsed the previous day. Duff & Phelps conducted an intensive sales process, attracting multiple offers for parts or the entirety of the business by early May 2016, but none met viability thresholds amid broader retail sector challenges such as shifting consumer preferences toward . The administrators emphasized procedural transparency, reporting to creditors on trading and asset valuations, while coordinating with stakeholders including landlords and suppliers to maintain short-term . No evidence of criminal was identified in the initial administration filings, with focus remaining on orderly asset realization rather than allegations of misconduct at that stage. The Pensions Regulator engaged concurrently to safeguard the defined benefit schemes, assessing options like anti-avoidance measures under section 89 of the Pensions Act 2004, though its interventions were secondary to the administrators' core mandate of maximizing creditor returns through potential sales or piecemeal asset disposals. By early June 2016, all buyer proposals were deemed unviable, prompting & Phelps to initiate a managed wind-down, realizing value from inventory and property leases without immediate . This phase prioritized procedural compliance, with creditor committees informed of realizations totaling modest recoveries against the overall deficit.

Store Closures and Job Losses

Following BHS's entry into administration on 25 April 2016, administrators initiated the closure of its store network, with 163 stores ultimately shuttered over the ensuing months. The process accelerated after a failed rescue bid in early June, leading to phased shutdowns that concluded with the final stores closing on 28 August 2016. This rapid wind-down eliminated BHS's physical retail presence in the after 88 years of operation. The store closures directly resulted in approximately 11,000 job losses, encompassing around 8,000 BHS employees and an additional 3,000 concession workers operating within the stores. The collapse also generated ripple effects for suppliers, including outstanding payments and halted orders that strained smaller vendors' cash flows in the lead-up to administration. Affected employees received statutory payments facilitated by the UK's Redundancy Payments Service, with the government covering entitlements totaling between £8 million and £12 million. Some former staff later secured additional compensation through legal claims over procedural shortcomings in the , sharing up to £1 million in settlements.

Pension and Regulatory Controversies

Scheme Deficit Evolution

The British Home Stores (BHS) pension schemes, consisting of a main defined benefit scheme and a separate senior executive scheme, exhibited a funding trajectory that shifted from surplus to deepening deficits between 2000 and 2015, reflecting broader pressures on legacy defined benefit plans. At the point of acquisition by in May 2000, the schemes recorded a combined surplus of £43 million on an ongoing valuation basis, which assumes continued scheme operation with future contributions. Even on a buy-out basis—reflecting the cost of securing annuities to fully insure liabilities—the position showed only a modest deficit of £39 million. This initial strength eroded progressively, influenced by actuarial revaluations and economic conditions. Key funding positions evolved as follows, based on Pensions Regulator estimates:
Year (March valuation)Ongoing Basis (£m)Buy-out Basis (£m)
2000+43-39
2003+28.3-261.9
2006-7.3-281.6
2009-165.9-401.9
2012-232.5-514.5
2015-251 to -332-571
The transition to deficits accelerated post-2003, with the ongoing surplus diminishing amid early contribution holidays—spanning three years following the 2000 acquisition—and limited subsequent employer top-ups, as business cash requirements took precedence over pension funding. By 2006, the schemes had flipped to deficits across bases, exacerbated by equity market declines during the global financial crisis, which reduced asset values relative to liabilities. Further deterioration by 2009 stemmed from these investment losses, alongside minimal annual contributions capped at levels like £6.5 million in 2009, insufficient to offset emerging shortfalls. Deficit expansion intensified in the due to macroeconomic and demographic factors common to many defined benefit schemes: persistently low gilt yields compressed discount rates, elevating the of long-term liabilities; updated assumptions extended projected benefit payout durations; and subdued returns failed to match liability growth. While these pressures were not unique to BHS—many legacy schemes experienced similar holiday-induced underfunding followed by yield-driven expansions—the absence of robust recovery top-ups and the sale timing amplified the buy-out deficit to £571 million, highlighting vulnerabilities in cash-strapped retail operations. By administration in April 2016, this figure underscored the schemes' underpreparedness for secure wind-up.

Investigations and Settlements

The Pensions Regulator initiated probes into the BHS pension schemes shortly after the company's April 2016 administration, examining potential employer debt avoidance by Sir Philip Green and Taveta-linked entities under the Pensions Act 2004, with a focus on the 2015 sale to Retail Acquisitions Limited. On 28 February 2017, the Regulator enforced a Section 89 order, securing a voluntary £363 million settlement from Green—comprising £343 million for a restructured scheme and up to £20 million for administration—explicitly without admission of liability by contributors. This funding averted full absorption by the Pension Protection Fund and enabled scheme restructuring, yielding approximately 88% of original accrued benefits for members—exceeding compensation caps—and an estimated surplus of £80-100 million on relevant bases. In August , the BHS2 scheme achieved a £800 million full with , insuring benefits for about 9,000 members who opted against lump sums or transfers. Over 99% of participants thereby received at least 80% of promised , underscoring the intervention's role in deficit mitigation. The Regulator's extraction of substantial resources post-insolvency was deemed a regulatory in prioritizing empirical recovery over PPF baselines, yet faced for hindsight-driven that disregarded earlier approvals of extended deficit recovery plans, such as the 23-year for a £200 million shortfall under Green's ownership.

Parliamentary and Official Inquiries

In July 2016, the UK Parliament's Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) Committee and Work and Pensions Committee published a joint on the sale and subsequent collapse of British Home Stores (BHS), attributing the retailer's demise primarily to "leadership failures" under Sir Philip 's ownership and the actions of buyer . The report highlighted that BHS's schemes, which were in surplus when Green acquired the company in 2000, deteriorated to a combined deficit of £571 million by the time of administration in 2016, contrasting sharply with over £400 million in dividends and other payments extracted from the company during Green's tenure. Committee chairs accused Green of presiding over a "corporate failure on a colossal scale" driven by "personal greed," describing the extraction of value as akin to "industrial-scale " or "plunder." Sir Philip Green rejected these characterizations, instructing legal counsel to review the report and deeming the inquiry process a "kangaroo court" biased against him, particularly citing the chairmanship of Work and Pensions Committee member Frank Field. Green's representatives emphasized that he had invested approximately £800 million in BHS over 15 years, including property and operational funding, and that the company faced broader retail sector challenges rather than deliberate asset-stripping; they noted his personal financial exposure through guarantees and the absence of any criminal findings against him. Green also pointed to the pension schemes' actuarial assumptions and investment underperformance as key deficit drivers, independent of dividend policies. The inquiries' politically charged language, including calls to strip Green of his knighthood, reflected parliamentary frustration amid 11,000 job losses but yielded no prosecutions or formal sanctions directly from the committees themselves, underscoring limitations in evidentiary standards for such hearings compared to judicial processes. Subsequent investigations by the Serious Fraud Office focused more on Chappell's conduct, with no charges filed against Green arising from the parliamentary probes. The reports recommended regulatory reforms but stopped short of attributing criminal intent, relying instead on retrospective analysis of financial flows without establishing causation for the collapse beyond critiques.

Director Penalties and 2024 Rulings

In November 2019, , the former owner and director of British Home Stores (BHS) who acquired the company in March 2015, was disqualified from acting as a company director for 10 years by the Insolvency Service. The disqualification stemmed from Chappell's abuse of position, including the unauthorized withdrawal of over £2.6 million in loans from BHS and related entities for personal use, alongside failures to manage the company's finances responsibly during its post-acquisition decline. Chappell's father, Joseph Chappell, who served as a director in connected companies, received a 5-year disqualification for similar lapses in oversight. These penalties were imposed following investigations into the directors' conduct after BHS entered administration in 2016, highlighting breaches of duties such as improper payments and inadequate scheme management, though separate from Philip Green's prior settlement with regulators. In June 2024, the ruled that two other former BHS directors from the Chappell era—Lennart Hennington, former chairman, and Dominic Chandler, former —were personally liable for wrongful trading and , ordering them to pay a minimum of £18 million to creditors combined. Each director was held accountable for £6.5 million in wrongful trading contributions, determined by the net deficiency in BHS's assets from the period they continued trading despite knowing or ought to have known there was no reasonable prospect of avoiding , spanning from late onward. A subsequent August 2024 judgment quantified additional liabilities, escalating the total potential exposure for the directors to over £150 million, including breaches involving unauthorized loans and transactions that exacerbated BHS's losses post-sale. These rulings, based on a five-week , emphasized the directors' failure to prioritize interests amid evident financial distress, setting a for personal accountability in cases without implicating Green's separate regulatory agreements.

International Operations and Brand Continuity

Franchise Networks Abroad

British Home Stores established international franchise networks spanning over three decades, with operations managed independently from the parent company through local partners. Al Mana Group, a Qatari conglomerate, had operated BHS franchises in the on this basis since 1985, facilitating stores in regions including the , , and . By the time of the administration in 2016, these networks comprised approximately 61 stores across 14 countries, such as , , , , and , alongside broader franchise agreements totaling around 74 operations in 18 countries. The 2016 UK collapse left these overseas franchises unaffected due to their autonomous structure under licensing agreements, allowing continuity without direct reliance on British parent finances. Administrators Duff & Phelps sold the international division, including over 70 stores and associated , to Al Mana Group in June 2016 for an undisclosed sum, preserving operational independence and enabling revenue generation from brand licensing fees. Following the acquisition, Al Mana rebranded the entity as BHS International and pursued expansion, announcing in October 2016 finalized deals with three franchise partners to enter 10 additional countries across , the , and . This demonstrated the franchises' potential as a viable asset separate from retail challenges, with post-sale activities underscoring the brand's residual commercial value through sustained international presence and planned growth, rather than implying complete cessation abroad.

Online Relaunch and Post-Collapse Adaptation

In September 2016, the Qatari conglomerate Al Mana Group acquired the BHS brand's and relaunched it as an online-only retailer via BHS.com, emphasizing home furnishings, lighting, and select apparel without the burdens of physical store leases or inventory overheads associated with the original chain. The platform, operated by BHS International—a new entity formed by Al Mana—launched on September 29, 2016, with a lean team of 84 employees, mostly retained from the prior administration, and targeted customers alongside potential international expansion through the group's Middle Eastern networks. The relaunch positioned BHS as a streamlined operation, drawing on the brand's legacy customer base of approximately 1.2 million members to sell curated best-sellers from the defunct retailer's lines, with initial marketing focused on digital channels rather than high-street presence. Despite early indicators of viability, including a reported 23% sales increase for the six months ending April 28, 2018, Al Mana conducted a strategic review and announced the closure of BHS., ceasing trading on June 27, 2018, with final deliveries completed by early July. This digital pivot exemplified a market-oriented salvage of the BHS name post-insolvency, prioritizing low-cost scalability over legacy retail models, though it proved unsustainable within two years.

Broader Legacy and Lessons

Economic Impacts on Stakeholders

The collapse of British Home Stores (BHS) in April 2016 resulted in approximately 11,000 across its workforce, comprising direct employees and in-store contractors, marking one of the largest retail job losses since Woolworths in 2008. Many affected workers received only statutory payments, with reports indicating that the company's depleted resources prevented full contractual entitlements, exacerbating short-term financial hardship for lower-paid staff in a sector already facing competitive pressures from online retail. Suppliers bore significant unpaid debts, with nearly 1,000 small and medium-sized firms collectively owed around £52 million as of late April 2016, contributing to cash flow strains and potential insolvencies among vulnerable trade creditors who had extended based on BHS's longstanding high-street presence. These losses formed part of broader unsecured claims exceeding £1.3 billion, though suppliers ranked below landlords and obligations in administration priority, limiting recoveries to pennies on the pound for many. Indirect economic effects included localized disruptions to high streets, where BHS's 164 store closures left voids in footfall-dependent town centers, amplifying vacancy rates and reducing ancillary spending at nearby businesses; by April 2017, two-thirds of former BHS sites remained unoccupied, compounding pre-existing retail decline but without triggering widespread systemic contagion due to the sector's fragmented nature. Taxpayer exposure remained minimal, as resolutions relied on private settlements and the Pension Protection Fund rather than direct bailouts, preserving fiscal insulation while highlighting the self-correcting dynamics of market-driven retail failures. ![British Home Stores closing down sale, Wood Green, London, 3 August 2016]float-right

Implications for Retail and Governance

The collapse of British Home Stores underscored the retail sector's vulnerability to the rapid ascent of e-commerce, which eroded the viability of traditional high-street models reliant on physical footfall. Between 2010 and 2020, online retail's share of total UK sales surged from approximately 8% to over 20%, driven by consumer preferences for convenience and lower prices, while high-street footfall declined by up to 15% in key periods amid shifting behaviors. BHS's lag in digital investment exemplified this mismatch, as its store-centric strategy faltered against competitors like Amazon, whose market penetration accelerated sector-wide store closures; empirical parallels include the failures of Woolworths in 2009 and subsequent casualties like Debenhams in 2021, where inadequate omnichannel integration contributed to insolvency amid a 47% spike in online sales during 2020 alone. Causal factors in retail decline extend beyond individual mismanagement to structural shifts, including rising operational costs and over-reliance on legacy formats ill-suited to e-commerce's . retail output faced systemic pressures, with high-street vacancies climbing to 14% by 2019 and total sector insolvencies rising 20% year-on-year in the mid-2010s, reflecting broader adaptation failures rather than isolated governance lapses. In governance terms, BHS highlighted the perils of defined benefit (DB) schemes in cyclical industries like retail, where volatile cash flows amplify funding shortfalls; the firm's £571 million deficit at stemmed from asset-liability mismatches exacerbated by low interest rates and sector instability, a pattern evident across DB schemes where deficits ballooned industry-wide post-2008. Private ownership, as under , enabled initial agility—pre-tax profits rose from £18.5 million to £94.8 million in the first year post-2000 acquisition through cost efficiencies and asset optimization—contrasting with plodding public entities burdened by disclosure mandates. While critiques emphasized dividend extractions totaling over £580 million, these followed profitability gains, illustrating private control's capacity for decisive amid retail headwinds; post-crisis regulatory pushes, such as enhanced auditing, have yielded mixed results, with some reforms later rescinded due to stifling dynamism without addressing root volatilities. Overregulation overlooks how private incentives drove BHS's early turnaround, suggesting that risks in volatile sectors warrant scheme redesigns over blanket oversight, as evidenced by the shift toward defined contribution models in retail to align liabilities with uncertain revenues.

References

  1. https://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/bhs-plc-history/
  2. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/14450812.timeline-bhs-went-high-street-perennial-administration/
  3. https://culture.fandom.com/wiki/British_Home_Stores
  4. https://www.birst.co.uk/history/british-home-stores-how-to-lose-200million-in-15-years/
  5. https://www.learnmarketing.net/MarketingAnalysisofBritishHomeStores.html
  6. https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/164/work-and-pensions-committee/news/98027/leadership-failures-and-personal-greed-led-to-collapse-of-bhs/
  7. https://the-cfo.io/2016/04/27/the-reasons-why-bhs-failed/
  8. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14735970.2018.1496780
  9. https://www.ukessays.com/essays/business/causes-of-british-home-stores-downfall.php
  10. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-36436576
  11. https://www.itv.com/news/2016-08-28/the-rise-and-falls-of-british-home-stores
  12. https://buildingourpast.com/2016/04/10/british-home-stores-part-1-1928-39/
  13. https://buildingourpast.com/2016/04/16/british-home-stores-part-2-the-1940s-and-1950s/
  14. https://buildingourpast.com/2016/04/21/british-home-stores-part-3-1960-to-2016/
  15. https://oro.open.ac.uk/46043/3/46043.pdf
  16. https://www.thetimes.com/business-money/markets/article/americans-who-wanted-people-to-buy-british-kf3pfdg5x
  17. https://www.retail-week.com/department-stores/at-a-glance-bhs-the-loss-making-retailer-put-up-for-sale/5071398.article
  18. https://www.emerald.com/ijrdm/article-pdf/9/2/8/2304247/eb018090.pdf
  19. https://www.encyclopedia.com/books/politics-and-business-magazines/storehouse-plc
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357182746_British_Home_Stores_Collapse_What_Went_Wrong
  21. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/04/25/bhs-collapse-raises-more-questions-than-it-gives-answers---but-i/
  22. https://www.ukessays.com/essays/retail/causes-bhs-retail-failure-0266.php
  23. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/525954.stm
  24. https://www.company-histories.com/Storehouse-PLC-Company-History.html
  25. https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/news/article-1571219/The-changing-fortunes-of-Bhs.html
  26. https://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/storehouse-plc-history/
  27. https://www.theguardian.com/business/1999/nov/19/4
  28. https://www.theguardian.com/business/1999/may/30/highstreetretailers.observerbusiness1
  29. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/mar/12/sir-philip-green-sells-off-lossmaking-bhs
  30. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-20641981
  31. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmworpen/54/5404.htm
  32. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/04/26/how-much-has-sir-philip-green-made-from-bhs/
  33. https://revisesociology.com/2016/10/14/philip-green-bhs-marxism/
  34. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-36143599
  35. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/apr/25/bhs-philip-green-family-millions-administration-arcadia
  36. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-36139828
  37. https://www.dissertationhomework.com/samples/assignment-essay-samples/management/a-critical-analysis-of-the-business-strategy-used-by-bhs-from
  38. https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2014/1125/662302-arcadia-results/
  39. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/mar/19/bhs-battles-stay-on-the-high-street
  40. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmworpen/54/54.pdf
  41. https://moneyweek.com/446208/sir-philip-green-and-the-bhs-scandal
  42. https://news.sky.com/story/green-slams-mps-report-on-bhs-collapse-as-bizarre-10621940
  43. https://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/24/philip-greens-greed-brought-down-bhs-cost-11000-jobs-damaged-pension-fund.html
  44. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmworpen/54/5405.htm
  45. https://www.risingedge.co/news/bhs-pensions-ptl
  46. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/feb/28/philip-green-agrees-pay-363m-bhs-pension-fund
  47. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-39118566
  48. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/europe/philip-green-agrees-363-mln-stg-bhs-pension-deal-with-regulator-idUSL5N1GD5Z9/
  49. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-31851887
  50. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-36708779
  51. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/jun/27/sir-philip-green-main-bhs-sale-pension-regulator-report
  52. https://committees.parliament.uk/work/1826/the-sale-and-acquisition-of-bhs-inquiry/news/105180/advisers-to-retail-acquisitions-limited-questioned-on-bhs-purchase/
  53. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/may/04/retail-acquisitions-bhs-liquidation-dominic-chappell
  54. https://www.professionalpensions.com/news/1007734/retail-acquisitions-maintains-bhs-pensions
  55. https://www.businessinsider.com/bhs-inquiry-dominic-chappell-faces-mps-2016-6
  56. https://startups.co.uk/news/the-downfall-of-bhs/
  57. https://www.retail-week.com/department-stores/analysis-five-things-that-led-to-the-collapse-of-bhs-/7006919.article
  58. https://wwd.com/business-news/retail/bhs-swept-away-by-competition-and-rapid-change-on-british-high-street-10417921/
  59. https://www.economist.com/britain/2016/04/25/another-iconic-british-high-street-brand-has-gone-under
  60. https://theconversation.com/britains-ruthless-high-street-leaves-no-room-for-stragglers-like-bhs-58345
  61. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-36175250
  62. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-35834473
  63. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/apr/25/bhs-heading-for-administration-as-rescue-deal-fails
  64. https://www.businessinsider.com/bhs-in-administration-11000-jobs-risk-2016-4
  65. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-36262767
  66. https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/blog/restructuring-and-insolvency/the-decline-fall-of-british-homes-stores
  67. https://www.retail-week.com/department-stores/bhs-administration-timeline-plots-the-demise-of-a-retail-giant/7006916.article
  68. https://www.pensions-expert.com/bhs-collapse-raises-questions-for-the-regulator/27226.article
  69. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-36437445
  70. https://www.accountancyage.com/2016/04/25/duff-phelps-on-cusp-of-formal-administrator-appointment-to-struggling-bhs/
  71. https://www.drapersonline.com/news/bhs-staff-owed-up-to-12m-in-redundancy-payouts
  72. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-37207481
  73. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-54056046
  74. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/bhs-in-administration-information-for-employees
  75. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/apr/14/bhs-workers-share-1m-payout-over-failed-redundancy-process
  76. https://www.thepensionsregulator.gov.uk/media/2foc4hm0/regulatory-intervention-section-89-bhs.pdf
  77. https://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-committees/work-and-pensions/BHS-pension-scheme-minutes-27-September-2000.pdf
  78. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-36880230
  79. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irj.12261
  80. https://www.pensioncorporation.com/news-insights/press-releases/2018/pic-fully-insures-bhs2-pension-scheme-in-p800-million-buyout
  81. https://www.macfarlanes.com/media/1563/the-pensions-regulator-and-the-bhs-pension-scheme.pdf
  82. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-36934691
  83. https://www.businessinsider.com/taveta-barristers-mps-bhs-report-parliament-vote-sir-philip-green-knighthood-2016-10
  84. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/sep/28/serious-office-steps-up-bhs-investigation
  85. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/nov/05/former-bhs-owner-dominic-chappell-banned-from-becoming-company-director
  86. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/bhs-investigation
  87. https://www.howespercival.com/case-studies/former-bhs-director-disqualified-for-10-years/
  88. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c722n81kkpxo
  89. https://www.theguardian.com/business/article/2024/jun/11/two-former-bhs-directors-ordered-to-pay-at-least-18m-over-wrongful-trading
  90. https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/directors-take-note-english-court-4632840/
  91. https://kennedyslaw.com/en/thought-leadership/case-review/2024/home-truths-for-directors-in-the-wake-of-bhs-insolvency-an-update/
  92. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/10/23/bhs-lives-on---but-only-overseas-as-new-qatari-owners-invest-in/
  93. https://www.indiaretailing.com/2016/10/07/bhs-returns-as-bhs-international-focuses-on-e-shop/
  94. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jun/30/bhs-administrators-sell-online-overseas-operations-al-mana-group-qatar
  95. https://www.drapersonline.com/news/bhs-administrators-sell-overseas-and-online-operations
  96. https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/bhs-plans-expansion-under-new-ownership-1.162993
  97. https://news.sky.com/story/bhs-lives-on-as-new-owners-plan-ambitious-overseas-expansion-10630496
  98. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/sep/25/bhs-to-relaunch-as-nimble-and-efficient-online-brand
  99. https://wwd.com/business-news/retail/al-mana-group-relaunches-britains-bhs-as-an-online-retailer-10564506/
  100. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/sep/25/bhs-to-launch-online-a-month-after-last-store-closed
  101. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-37466514
  102. https://insideretail.asia/2016/09/27/bhs-international-rises-from-the-ashes-online-2/
  103. https://fashionunited.uk/news/business/al-mana-group-to-close-down-bhs-com-on-june-27/2018053129960
  104. https://www.retail-week.com/department-stores/bhscom-to-be-shut-down-as-al-mana-pulls-plug-/7029191.article
  105. https://www.housebeautiful.com/uk/lifestyle/shopping/a21050316/bhs-website-to-close/
  106. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/apr/26/bhs-1000-suppliers-face-unpaid-millions
  107. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/03/07/bhs-warns-over-13bn-in-unpaid-debts-if-it-goes-out-of-business/
  108. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/apr/16/two-thirds-of-bhs-stores-lie-empty-as-anniversary-of-collapse-nears
  109. https://www.retaileconomics.co.uk/retail-insights-trends/BHS-collapse-a-devastating-blow-to-the-high-street?slug=retail-economic-news
  110. https://www.ons.gov.uk/businessindustryandtrade/retailindustry/timeseries/j4mc/drsi
  111. https://www.statista.com/topics/4655/high-street-retail-in-the-united-kingdom-uk/
  112. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353601160_The_impact_of_E-Commerce_in_UKs_High_Street
  113. https://www.statista.com/topics/2333/e-commerce-in-the-united-kingdom/
  114. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06186/SN06186.pdf
  115. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780223003268
  116. https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/britain-pulls-rules-aimed-applying-lessons-carillion-bhs-collapses-2023-10-16/
  117. https://www.anthonygregg.com/insights/uk-retailers-are-facing-issues-with-their-pension-schemes/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.