Hubbry Logo
Chip timingChip timingMain
Open search
Chip timing
Community hub
Chip timing
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Chip timing
Chip timing
Chip timing
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A Jaguar Timing System at a finish line using RFID technology with overhead antennas and passive, disposable chips
A ChronoTrack race controller with RFID antennas for detecting transponders attached to runner's shoes
Runners passing RFID detection mats that are connected to decoders
Active chip timing transponder
ChampionChip

Transponder timing (also called chip timing or RFID timing) is a technique for measuring performance in sport events. A transponder working on a radio-frequency identification (RFID) basis is attached to the athlete and emits a unique code that is detected by radio receivers located at the strategic points in an event.

Prior to the use of this technology, races were either timed by hand (with operators pressing a stopwatch) or using video camera systems.

Transponder systems

[edit]

Generally, there are two types of transponder timing systems; active and passive. An active transponder consists of a battery-powered transceiver, connected to the athlete, that emits its unique code when it is interrogated.

A passive transponder does not contain a power source inside the transponder. Instead, the transponder captures electromagnetic energy produced by a nearby exciter and utilizes that energy to emit a unique code.

In both systems, an antenna is placed at the start, finish, and in some cases, intermediate time points and is connected to a decoder. This decoder identifies the unique transponder code and calculates the exact time when the transponder passes a timing point. Some implementations of timing systems require the use of a mat on the ground at the timing points while other systems implement the timing points with vertically oriented portals.

History

[edit]

RFID was first used in the late 1980s primarily for motor racing and became more widely adopted in athletic events in the mid-1990s upon the release of low cost 134 kHz transponders and readers from Texas Instruments. This technology formed the basis of electronic sports timing for the world's largest running events as well as for cycling, triathlon and skiing. Some manufacturers made improvements to the technology to handle larger numbers of transponders in the read field or improve the tolerance of their systems to low-frequency noise. These low-frequency systems are still used a lot today. Other manufacturers developed their own proprietary RFID systems usually as an offshoot to more industrial applications. These latter systems attempted to get around the problem of reading large numbers of transponders in a read field by using the High Frequency 13.56 MHz RFID methodology that allowed transponders to use anti-collision algorithms to avoid tags interfering with each other's signal during the down-link between transponder and reader. Active transponder systems continued to mature and despite their much higher cost they retained market share in the high speed sports like motor racing, cycling and ice skating. Active systems are also used at high-profile events such as the Olympics due to their very high read rates and time-stamping precision. By 2005 a newer RFID technology was becoming available, mostly for industrial applications. The first and second generation (UHF) transponders and readers that were being developed followed a strict protocol to ensure that multiple transponders and readers could be used between manufacturers.[1] Much like the HF tags, the UHF tags were much cheaper to produce in volume and formed the basis in the next revolution in sports timing. Currently, many of the largest athletic events are timed using disposable transponders either placed on the back of a race number or on the runner's shoe. The low cost meant that transponders were now fully disposable and did not need to be returned to the organizers after the event.

Usage

[edit]

Very large running events (more than 10,000) and triathlons were the first events to be transponder (or chip) timed because it is near impossible to manually time them. Also for large runs there are delays in participants reaching the start line, which penalize their performance. Some races place antennas or timing mats at both the start line and the finish line, which allow the exact net time to be calculated. Awards in a race are generally based on the "gun time" (which ignores any delay at the start) as per IAAF and USA Track and Field rules. However, some races use "net time" for presenting age group awards.

In the past the transponder was almost always worn on the athletes running shoe, or on an ankle band. This enabled the transponder to be read best on antenna mats because the distance between the transponder and readers antenna is minimized offering the best capture rate. Transponders may be threaded onto the shoe laces for running. For triathlon a soft elastic ankle band holds the transponder to the leg and care is taken to ensure the transponder is in the correct orientation or polarity for maximum read performance. Transponders have also been placed on the race bib. In the past 5 years[when?] the newer UHF systems use transponders placed on the shoe lace, or stuck to the race number bib. In both cases, care must be taken to ensure the UHF tag does not directly touch a large part of the skin as this affects read performance. Despite this, UHF Systems have read performances as good (if not better) than the conventional low and high frequency systems. Because these UHF tags are made in huge volumes for industrial applications, their price is much lower than that of conventional re-usable transponders and the race does not bother to collect them afterwards. As of 2015, many UHF timers use a combination of ground antennas with panel antenna(s) mounted on a tripod at the side of the race course.[2]

A passive tag to be used on the back of the bib
Disposable bib with two passive timing chips at the back
Back side of disposable RFID tag used for race timing showing components.
Back side of disposable RFID tag used for race timing

All RFID timing systems incorporate a box housing the reader(s) with peripherals like a microprocessor, serial or Ethernet communications and power source (battery). The readers are attached to one or more antennas that are designed for the particular operating frequency. In the case of low or medium frequencies these consist of wire loops incorporated into mats that cover the entire width of the timing point. For UHF systems the antennas consist of patch antennas that are protected in a matting system. The patch antennas may also be placed on stands or a finish gantry pointing towards the oncoming athlete. In most cases the distance between reader and antennas is restricted. Also more equipment is needed for events that require multiple timing points. Wider timing points require more readers and antennas. For active systems a simple wire loop is all that is needed since the transponder has its own power source and the loop serves as a trigger to turn on the transponder, then receive the relatively strong signal from the transponder. Therefore, active systems need less readers (or decoders) per timing point width.

All systems utilize specialized software to calculate results and splits.[3] This software usually resides on a separate PC computer that is connected to the readers via serial or Ethernet communications. The software relates the raw transponder code and timestamp data to each entrant in a database and calculates gun and net times of runners, or the splits of a triathlete.[4] In advanced systems these results are instantly calculated and published to the internet so that athletes and spectators have access to results via any web enabled device.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Chip timing

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Chip timing is a radio-frequency identification (RFID)-based technology used primarily in mass-participation sporting events, such as road races and marathons, to precisely record an individual participant's elapsed time from when they cross the starting line to the finish line, providing a more accurate "net time" compared to the traditional "gun time" that begins with the official race start signal. These lightweight transponders, commonly referred to as timing chips, are attached to the runner's race bib, shoe, or wristband and emit a unique identification code when passing over detection mats embedded in the course. By eliminating delays caused by crowded starts in large events, chip timing ensures fairer results and enables detailed tracking of split times at intermediate points. The origins of chip timing trace back to the early , when Dutch innovators developed the first RFID-based system for running events in 1993 to address inaccuracies in manual and gun-time methods during crowded races. Prior to this, race timing relied on stopwatches, but these struggled with the scale of modern mass events where thousands of participants could face start-line delays of several minutes. The technology quickly gained adoption, with major marathons implementing it in the late , including the in 1999, revolutionizing results processing by automating data collection and reducing human error. At its core, chip timing operates through passive or active RFID systems: passive chips are powered by the reader's and are cost-effective for disposable use, while active chips include batteries for longer-range detection in high-speed or vehicle-based events like or triathlons. When a participant crosses a —typically a series of antennas connected to a central computer—the chip's signal is captured, timestamped to the , and linked to the athlete's registration data for real-time or post-event results. This setup not only supports individual performance metrics but also facilitates features like live leaderboards, age-group rankings, and anti-cheating measures through unique serial numbers. Beyond running, chip timing has expanded to other sports including obstacle races, swimming, and motorsports, where it enhances by integrating with software for instant data analysis and participant verification. Its widespread use underscores a shift toward precision and inclusivity in and athletics, allowing organizers to handle events with over 50,000 entrants efficiently while providing runners with verifiable, personalized records.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

Chip timing is an electronic timing method that employs radio-frequency identification (RFID) transponders, often referred to as chips, attached to participants in sporting events to automatically capture their start, split, and finish times without requiring manual intervention. These chips function by transmitting or reflecting signals when they pass over detection points, enabling precise logging of an individual's performance data in real time. The core purpose of chip timing is to deliver net time measurements, which calculate the elapsed time from a participant's moment of crossing the start line to reaching the finish line, in contrast to gun time that begins with the event's official starting signal for all competitors. This approach minimizes timing discrepancies caused by congestion at the start in mass participation races, providing fairer and more accurate results for individual rankings, age-group awards, and personal records. Chips are typically integrated into race bibs for easy visibility and handling or fastened via adjustable ankle straps to ensure secure placement during movement. At its foundation, the "chip" is a compact, durable RFID tag designed to withstand the rigors of athletic activities. Key variants include active chips, which incorporate batteries to actively transmit signals over greater distances, and passive chips, which draw power from the nearby reader's for operation, making them lighter and more economical for large-scale events.

Comparison to Traditional Timing

Traditional timing methods in races, particularly for mass-participation events like marathons, relied on manual techniques such as stopwatches operated by volunteers to record finish times alongside runners' bib numbers. These approaches, often combined with gun-time measurement—where the official clock starts for all participants upon the firing of the starting pistol—frequently introduced significant inaccuracies due to human error, such as misrecording numbers or failing to capture times amid crowded finishes. In large events, positioning at the start line exacerbated these issues; runners positioned at the rear could face delays of several minutes before crossing the starting line, leading to gun times that misrepresented their actual performance by up to 20 minutes or more in extreme cases. Photo-finish cameras, while providing precision to the thousandth of a second for elite track events, were impractical for road races with thousands of participants, as they could not individualize times across a broad field. In contrast, chip timing delivers individualized net times—measuring the elapsed time from when each runner crosses the start line to the finish line—with accuracy to the hundredth of a second, fundamentally addressing the limitations of gun-time and manual methods. This precision eliminates human error in recording and allows simultaneous timing of thousands of participants without the need for manual intervention at the finish. Unlike traditional systems, which struggled with scalability and often resulted in delayed or disputed results, chip timing enables processing for immediate leaderboards and provisional rankings, enhancing and participant experience. For instance, in a typical marathon, a mid-pack runner might record a gun time of 4 hours and 15 minutes due to start-line congestion, but their chip-derived net time could be 3 hours and 55 minutes, reflecting their true effort and aligning with the purpose of net time as an individual's personal benchmark. Such distinctions became particularly vital in events like the 2002 , where average start delays reached 8.5 minutes, underscoring why chip timing has become essential for fair and accurate results in modern competitions.

Technical Aspects

Transponder Technology

Transponders in chip timing systems are radio-frequency identification (RFID) devices attached to participants, designed to transmit unique identifiers when interrogated by nearby readers. These devices enable precise, automated detection of an athlete's position at key points in a race, such as start, finish, or intermediate checkpoints. Chip timing transponders primarily fall into two categories: passive and active. Passive RFID chips, the most common type for mass participation events, lack an internal power source and are energized solely by the electromagnetic field generated by the interrogating reader. This design makes them low-cost, lightweight, and disposable, often embedded directly into race bibs or disposable tags, allowing for efficient distribution to thousands of participants. In contrast, active chips incorporate a battery to power their transmission, enabling longer read ranges—up to several meters—and more reliable performance in high-precision or low-density scenarios, such as professional cycling or motorsports events, though they are bulkier and more expensive. Operationally, these transponders utilize specific bands to communicate . Low-frequency (LF) variants operate at 125-134 kHz for short-range applications, while ultra-high (UHF) transponders, predominant in modern race timing, function in the 860-960 MHz range, supporting read distances of up to 10 meters depending on reader power and environmental factors. Each transponder encodes a unique or participant ID, typically in a 64- to 128-bit format compliant with standards like ISO 18000-6C, which allows readers to decode and associate the signal with the correct athlete in real time. To withstand the rigors of athletic events, transponders incorporate durability features such as (often rated IP67 or higher) and shock resistance to endure impacts, sweat, and environmental exposure. Integration methods vary by event type: bib tags for running races provide simple, one-time attachment, while reusable ankle bands or wrist straps secure chips for multi-sport disciplines like triathlons, ensuring consistent positioning near the ground for optimal reader detection.

Timing Process

In chip timing systems, antenna mats embedded with coils generate electromagnetic fields that power and activate passive transponders (such as RFID tags) when participants cross them, enabling the reading of unique identification codes without requiring batteries in the chips. The timing process begins when a participant crosses the start mat, where the transponder is detected by the antennas, and the precise start time is logged based on the exact moment of activation. Optional intermediate timing points, or split mats, may be placed along the course to capture elapsed times at key distances, providing data for progress tracking and verification. The process concludes at the finish mat, where the transponder is again detected, logging the finish time. Raw detection data from the mats is processed by on-site decoders that translate signals into participant IDs and timestamps, then transmitted in real time via wireless networks to a central server for aggregation and calculation. The net time for each participant is computed as the difference between the finish time and start time (net time = finish time - start time), ensuring accuracy regardless of staggered starts or crowd delays. To handle potential data issues, systems support real-time wireless uploads from multiple timing points, allowing immediate , while error correction mechanisms—such as deploying backup antennas or algorithmic filtering of duplicate reads—minimize missed detections caused by tag misalignment or interference.

System Components

Chip timing systems rely on a suite of integrated hardware components to detect and record transponder signals accurately. Central to this hardware are timing mats, which are durable, rubberized surfaces embedded with RFID antennae and readers that generate an to capture chip activations as participants cross designated points. These mats, often 4 feet wide and connectable in sections up to 32 feet for broader coverage, are placed flat across paths like start and finish lines to ensure reliable detection without requiring precise alignment from the . Additional hardware includes portable RFID readers or fixed timing gates, which process signals from the antennae. Portable readers, such as the Speedway R420 model with four antenna ports, allow flexibility for multi-point events by mounting on tripods or trusses, while fixed gates provide stationary setups at key locations like split points in races. These readers support by linking multiple units to handle large fields, enabling simultaneous detection for over 1,000 participants. systems, including video cameras integrated with timing hardware, offer verification by timestamping footage to resolve any disputed reads or missed detections. Software forms the backbone for in chip timing systems, with central platforms aggregating reads from multiple readers in real-time. These applications, such as Webscorer PRO, handle database by linking chip IDs to participant details, enabling quick searches, updates, and error corrections during events. They also facilitate result printing, export to formats like CSV or PDF, and integration with external scoring systems for live leaderboards or official certifications. Setup logistics ensure operational reliability, particularly for extended or remote events. Power sources typically include 12V batteries paired with inverters to sustain readers and antennae for over 24 hours, while cabling—such as Ethernet for network connectivity and for antennae—connects components across distances up to several hundred feet without signal degradation. For multi-point configurations in large-scale races, systems scale through modular cabling and additional power units, supporting seamless data flow from dispersed mats to a central server.

Historical Development

Origins

Chip timing emerged in the early 1980s as an application of (RFID) technology, initially developed for precise timing in motor racing to track vehicles at high speeds. Precursors to this technology appeared in the 1970s for animal racing, with a U.S. patent describing a transponder-based system for high-resolution timing of race horses at multiple stations along a track. The transition to human athletics occurred in the early 1990s, driven by pioneers such as Heinfried Maschmeyer, a German inventor who developed the ChampionChip in collaboration with TIRIS for transponder-based athlete identification and timing. This innovation built on early 1980s patents for RFID transponders in tracking applications, adapting them for sports performance measurement. The first major implementation for a human running event was at the 1994 , where the ChampionChip was used to record accurate net times for thousands of participants by detecting chips attached to runners' shoelaces as they crossed timing mats. Early chips were encased in glass capsules within plastic mounts, secured via zip-ties, and required manual retrieval post-race to reuse the expensive components, which cost $4–$5 each. Initial adoption faced significant hurdles, including the high per-unit cost limiting scalability, short read ranges that struggled with dense crowds, and logistical complexities in chip distribution and collection, prompting pilot tests in smaller regional events before scaling to international marathons. These challenges underscored the need for more robust, disposable alternatives in subsequent iterations.

Key Milestones

In the 1990s, chip timing saw significant expansion through adoption in prominent mass-participation events, transitioning from niche applications to a viable alternative for large-scale races. The implemented chip timing in 1996 during its centennial edition, becoming the first major U.S. marathon to use the ChampionChip system for accurate net-time scoring of over 38,000 participants. This innovation addressed longstanding issues with gun-time discrepancies in crowded starts. The adopted the ChampionChip in 1999, enabling precise tracking for its growing field and marking a key step in the technology's mainstream integration. ChampionChip's reusable transponders, introduced earlier in the decade, facilitated these advancements by providing reliable low-frequency RFID reads at multiple points along the course. During the and , chip timing evolved with technological upgrades that improved and . A shift to ultra-high (UHF) RFID occurred around the mid-2000s, enabling faster read speeds—up to several hundred tags per second—and supporting disposable bib-integrated tags that reduced logistics costs compared to reusable shoelace-mounted versions. Post-2010, integration with GPS technology emerged to support virtual and hybrid races, allowing participants to self-report locations via apps while chip systems handled in-person verification for hybrid events. Global standardization advanced through systems like IPICO's UHF solutions and MYLAPS (formerly ChampionChip), which by the powered thousands of events worldwide with interoperable hardware and software for consistent data handling. In 2010, MYLAPS introduced the BibTag system, embedding disposable UHF chips directly into race bibs for seamless, one-time use. Recent developments up to 2025 have incorporated AI for enhanced accuracy and user engagement. AI algorithms now assist in error detection by analyzing read patterns to flag anomalies like missed tags or duplicates, improving reliability in high-density finishes. App-based real-time tracking, powered by cloud-connected chip systems, provides live updates to spectators. These innovations, including MYLAPS's 2015 EventApp for instant results, have solidified chip timing as the global standard for endurance events.

Applications and Usage

In Mass Participation Events

Chip timing plays a pivotal role in mass participation road races, ranging from 5K fun runs to ultramarathons, especially those attracting over 10,000 runners where traditional gun-time methods would disadvantage participants due to staggered starts and crowding. By capturing each runner's net time from the moment they cross the start line to the finish, the technology ensures accurate rankings for age-group awards and qualifiers for prestigious events like the , fostering fair competition across diverse participant levels. Implementation begins with pre-race chip assignment during registration, where disposable or reusable transponders are affixed to the runner's or race bib, integrating seamlessly with entry systems for automated distribution. The timing , involving RFID readers embedded in mats at key points, records data in real time, which is then processed post-race to produce individualized certificates, detailed split times, and dynamic leaderboards accessible via event apps or websites. This setup supports organizational by minimizing manual verification and enabling rapid result dissemination to thousands of participants. A notable case study is the London Marathon, which has employed chip timing since 1998 to determine net times for elite field qualification, accounting for delays in wave starts amid fields exceeding 50,000 runners and addressing overcrowding challenges at the start line. In 2025, the event set a Guinness World Record for the largest number of finishers in a marathon with 56,640 participants, underscoring the technology's scalability. This approach has allowed organizers to maintain integrity in elite selections while providing equitable timing for the mass field, with systems handling high volumes to deliver results for age-group and fundraising categories promptly. Similar scalability is evident in events like the , where chip systems process over 30,000 entries annually, supporting precise awards without logistical bottlenecks.

In Other Sports and Activities

Chip timing technology extends beyond traditional running events into various multisport disciplines and team-based activities, where it enables precise measurement of performance across multiple segments or individual contributions. In , particularly in races like the , riders are equipped with transponders—small electronic chips attached to their bicycles—that record split times at intermediate checkpoints and the finish line, ensuring accurate stage results even in finishes. This system allows organizers to capture individual timings to within milliseconds, accounting for group dynamics and varying stage difficulties. In , chip timing is essential for tracking transitions between swim, bike, and run segments, with athletes wearing waterproof RFID chips on ankle straps that activate at designated mats in transition areas. These chips provide split times for each discipline and overall race duration, helping to identify efficiencies in gear changes and segment pacing, which can significantly impact final standings in events like Ironman competitions. Similarly, —combining running and —utilize chip timing for main splits, such as run-to-bike and bike-to-run transitions, with systems like those from specialized providers capturing data at multiple points to support relay formats and individual results. In adventure races, which incorporate elements of , , paddling, and , timing chips affixed to participants' gear ensure comprehensive tracking across diverse terrains, facilitating real-time scoring in team-based formats. Beyond competitive sports, chip timing finds application in non-competitive and recreational scenarios, such as corporate challenges and team-building events, where it records participant times in fun runs or multisport relays to foster engagement and provide personalized results. For virtual events, integrations with —such as GPS-enabled devices or RFID chips—allow remote timing by logging start, splits, and finish data through apps, enabling global participation without physical infrastructure. Adaptations of chip timing principles appear in vehicular contexts. In , transponder-based systems mounted on vehicles provide times, sector splits, and positional data during circuit events, supporting real-time scoring for series like Formula 1 and endurance races.

Benefits and Limitations

Advantages

Chip timing systems enhance operational efficiency in mass participation events by automating the recording of start and finish times for thousands of participants simultaneously, thereby reducing the need for extensive manual staffing at the finish line. This automation allows for the processing of large fields across wide finish chutes without , streamlining results distribution and enabling event organizers to focus resources elsewhere. Furthermore, chip timing provides transmission to broadcasters, mobile apps, and spectator displays, facilitating immediate updates on leaderboards and split times that improve the overall event experience. Recent advancements as of 2025 include integration with AI for advanced analytics and GPS for enhanced real-time tracking, further boosting accuracy and participant engagement. In terms of fairness, chip timing delivers precise net times that measure an individual's actual elapsed duration from start to finish, excluding delays caused by crowded starts, which motivates participants—particularly those in the back of the pack—to achieve personal records based on true performance. These verifiable results, captured electronically at multiple checkpoints, minimize disputes over timings and deter by tracking runner paths consistently throughout the course. By ensuring equitable and accurate outcomes, chip timing promotes greater participant satisfaction and trust in event integrity. Beyond core operations, chip timing offers long-term cost savings through reusable hardware components and open-system designs that avoid recurring vendor fees for tags and software, making it economical for recurring events compared to manual alternatives. Additionally, the detailed collected enables advanced , such as pace trends and segment performance insights for individuals and groups, supporting post-event reviews and for future races.

Challenges

Chip timing systems, while reliable for most events, face technical challenges that can lead to read failures. These failures often stem from chip damage during transport or use, signal interference caused by the human body absorbing UHF RFID waves, or overcrowding at start lines where dense packs of participants create a mass that blocks signals. In such crowded scenarios, error rates typically range from 0.3% to 2%, meaning 3 to 20 runners per 1,000 may not be detected, resulting in fallback to less accurate gun times. To mitigate these issues, organizers employ solutions like multi-antenna arrays, which use circularly polarized panels positioned on trusses or mats to improve coverage and reduce blind spots from tag orientation or body interference. Additionally, foam spacers between tags and clothing help minimize signal absorption, and uninterruptible power supplies (UPS) prevent data loss from brief outages. Despite these measures, improper tag placement—such as bibs folding or shoe chips detaching—remains a common culprit for missed reads. Logistically, chip timing incurs high setup costs, often exceeding $5,000 for large-scale events due to , staff deployment, and per-participant tag fees. For instance, systems for marathons with thousands of runners require multiple readers, mats, and software integration, pushing totals into several thousand euros or dollars depending on scale. Privacy concerns also arise from tracking, as RFID chips link timing to personal registration details like names and locations, raising risks of unauthorized access or if not properly anonymized. Environmental factors further complicate reliability, with weather impacting both battery-powered active chips and passive systems. Rain or high humidity can degrade mat performance by causing short circuits or signal attenuation, while extreme cold can significantly reduce battery life in active tags, potentially limiting read ranges. Post-2020 adaptations have emphasized contactless hygiene, such as disposable bib-integrated tags to minimize handling and reduce germ transmission during packet pickup and race day.

References

  1. https://mylaps.com/blog/difference-between-gun-time-and-chip-time/
  2. https://www.marathonguide.com/features/articles/racetimingwithchip.cfm
  3. https://www.verywellfit.com/what-is-a-chip-time-2911621
  4. https://mylaps.com/blog/the-history-of-running-timing/
  5. https://www.allsportstiming.com/2019/02/08/chip-timing/
  6. https://mynegativesplit.com/how-chip-timing-works/
  7. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/07/sports/sportsspecial/bits-bytes-and-blisters-tracking-runners-from-start-to.html
  8. https://mylaps.com/blog/how-do-you-time-a-running-race/
  9. https://www.hubertiming.com/runners/faq
  10. https://www.finishlinetiming.com/gun-time-vs-chip-time
  11. https://mylaps.com/blog/active-or-passive-timing-system/
  12. https://www.atlasrfidstore.com/rfid-insider/active-rfid-vs-passive-rfid/
  13. https://runtheday.com/blog/time-a-5k/history-of-race-timing/
  14. https://www.finishlinetiming.com/flt/blog
  15. https://raceid.com/organizer/timing/how-does-an-rfid-chip-timing-system-work/
  16. https://timingsense.com/en/blog/active-and-pasive-timing-systems/
  17. https://events.studio/which-race-timing-system-is-right-for-your-event/
  18. https://www.allsportstiming.com/2019/02/09/chip-timing-accuracy/
  19. https://www.atlasrfidstore.com/rfid-race-timing/
  20. https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Sports-RFID-Waterproof-Timing-Chip-UHF_1601043565216.html
  21. https://www.alibaba.com/showroom/rfid-timing-chip-race-timing-system.html
  22. https://www.atlasrfidstore.com/rfid-resources/race-timing-series-part-one/
  23. https://www.rfidlabel.com/how-to-prevent-missed-reads-with-high-frequency-rfid-readers/
  24. https://www.webscorer.com/blog/post/RECOMMENDED-RFID-TIMING-HARDWARE-SETUP
  25. https://www.racedirectorshq.com/read/build-rfid-race-timing-system-20/
  26. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4142680A/en
  27. https://eu.southcoasttoday.com/story/news/1996/02/20/time-has-come-for-marathon/50652614007/
  28. https://www.rfidjournal.com/expert-views/the-history-of-rfid-technology/76202/
  29. https://mylaps.com/news/championchip-celebrates-25th-anniversary/
  30. https://beyondcentralpark.com/BCPBoston1996.html
  31. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/nyc-marathons-championchip/
  32. https://www.accio.com/business/race-timing-system-trends
  33. https://mylaps.com/active-sports/solutions/bibtag-system/
  34. https://eventtechnology.org/solutions/the-future-of-race-timing-solutions-technology/
  35. https://www.runnersworld.com/races-places/a20820378/chip-time-vs-gun-time-who-decides/
  36. https://www.nytimes.com/1998/03/19/technology/microchips-are-latest-addition-to-gear-for-london-s-marathon.html
  37. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2025/apr/27/london-marathon-sets-world-record-for-number-of-finishers
  38. https://www.gearpatrol.com/watches/a267381/tour-de-france-timed/
  39. https://www.cyclist.co.uk/in-depth/timing-at-the-tour-de-france-with-tissot
  40. https://mylaps.com/active-sports/sports/triathlon/
  41. https://chiptimingsolutions.com/services/duathlon.html
  42. http://midohiorm.com/race-timing-services.html
  43. https://www.irvingmarathon.com/corporatechallenge
  44. https://info.runsignup.com/2025/02/04/bluetooth-and-lora-ready-for-timing-events/
  45. https://mylaps.com/motorsports/sports/car-racing/
  46. https://www.runnersworld.com/races-places/a20794751/chip-timing-com/
  47. https://www.racedirectorshq.com/read/buy-rent-build-chip-timing-system-8/
  48. https://raceclock.com/what-is-chip-timing-and-rfid-race-tracking/
  49. https://www.athleteguild.com/node/10062
  50. https://www.atlasrfidstore.com/rfid-resources/race-timing-series-part-three/
  51. https://www.rfidcard.com/top-rfid-problems-and-proven-solutions-a-complete-troubleshooting-guide/
  52. https://raceid.com/organizer/timing/how-much-does-rfid-chip-timing-cost/
  53. https://cdt.org/insights/privacy-best-practices-for-deployment-of-rfid-technology/
  54. https://www.nyrr.org/privacy-policy
  55. https://a2globalelectronics.com/electronics-news-trends/supply-chain-management-in-the-wake-of-a-pandemic/how-contactless-technology-may-help-flatten-the-covid19-curve/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.