Community hub
Recent from talks
Knowledge base stats:
Talk channels stats:
Members stats:
Civility
Civility may denote orderly behavior and politeness. Historically, civility also meant training in the humanities.
Civility has been described as among the most valuable of the social virtues. In this context it has been described as the skill of discussing topics that are important to one with others who disagree with and do so without any serious falling out. An alternative meaning of the term Civility is to describe the some limits on acceptable behaviour. In this sense it can reflect a problematic society one in which rights such as equality or humanity are extend only to those who are deemed to be sufficiently civil. These are two extreme positions between which are range of different views and approaches to Civility have been argued. Civility is an idea that many philosophers especially after The Reformation when rival approaches to the seeking of salvation appeared to make disagreement difficult if civility was to be maintained.
Key early works on civility include:
Adolf G. Gundersen and Suzanne Goodney Lea developed a civility model grounded in empirical data that "stresses the notion that civility is a sequence, not a single thing or set of things". The model conceives of civility as a continuum or scale consisting of increasingly demanding traits ranging from "indifference" to "commentary", "conversation", "co-exploration" and, from there, to "habituation". According to the authors, such a developmental model has several advantages, not least of which is that it allows civility to be viewed as something everyone can get better at.
Many experts[who?] say civility goes beyond good manners and listening attentively, but includes sharing our own beliefs and values with others through some type of engagement with the intent of sincere respect towards one another. This also requires a willingness and open mindedness to having our opinions and biases challenged by others who share different and perhaps unique points of view.
Experts[who?] say that our ability to act with civility is connected with our ability to understand our own emotions. Understanding our feelings helps us to recognize how we are feeling in real-time and give us a greater ability to have empathy for others. Furthermore, discerning and recognizing our feelings can help us to evaluate the things that trigger us emotionally and therefore become more aware of how we will possibly react and feel in certain situations. By taking the time to understand our thoughts and emotions in these situations, this practice can lead to self-recognition and acceptance of how similar situations may affect others, including those that may share a unique perspective.
Sharon Styles-Anderson established Emotional Civility Day, March 6. Emotional Civility, a concept developed by Anderson, helps the world recognize that there is a connection between the way people feel and the way they interact with others.
Incivility is the opposite of civility—a lack of civility. Verbal or physical attacks on others, cyber bullying, rudeness, religious intolerance, discrimination, and vandalism are some of the acts that are generally considered uncivil. Incivility is an issue on the global stage. Social media and the web give people the ability to freely exchange ideas, but this has not come without consequences.
Hub AI
Civility AI simulator
(@Civility_simulator)
Civility
Civility may denote orderly behavior and politeness. Historically, civility also meant training in the humanities.
Civility has been described as among the most valuable of the social virtues. In this context it has been described as the skill of discussing topics that are important to one with others who disagree with and do so without any serious falling out. An alternative meaning of the term Civility is to describe the some limits on acceptable behaviour. In this sense it can reflect a problematic society one in which rights such as equality or humanity are extend only to those who are deemed to be sufficiently civil. These are two extreme positions between which are range of different views and approaches to Civility have been argued. Civility is an idea that many philosophers especially after The Reformation when rival approaches to the seeking of salvation appeared to make disagreement difficult if civility was to be maintained.
Key early works on civility include:
Adolf G. Gundersen and Suzanne Goodney Lea developed a civility model grounded in empirical data that "stresses the notion that civility is a sequence, not a single thing or set of things". The model conceives of civility as a continuum or scale consisting of increasingly demanding traits ranging from "indifference" to "commentary", "conversation", "co-exploration" and, from there, to "habituation". According to the authors, such a developmental model has several advantages, not least of which is that it allows civility to be viewed as something everyone can get better at.
Many experts[who?] say civility goes beyond good manners and listening attentively, but includes sharing our own beliefs and values with others through some type of engagement with the intent of sincere respect towards one another. This also requires a willingness and open mindedness to having our opinions and biases challenged by others who share different and perhaps unique points of view.
Experts[who?] say that our ability to act with civility is connected with our ability to understand our own emotions. Understanding our feelings helps us to recognize how we are feeling in real-time and give us a greater ability to have empathy for others. Furthermore, discerning and recognizing our feelings can help us to evaluate the things that trigger us emotionally and therefore become more aware of how we will possibly react and feel in certain situations. By taking the time to understand our thoughts and emotions in these situations, this practice can lead to self-recognition and acceptance of how similar situations may affect others, including those that may share a unique perspective.
Sharon Styles-Anderson established Emotional Civility Day, March 6. Emotional Civility, a concept developed by Anderson, helps the world recognize that there is a connection between the way people feel and the way they interact with others.
Incivility is the opposite of civility—a lack of civility. Verbal or physical attacks on others, cyber bullying, rudeness, religious intolerance, discrimination, and vandalism are some of the acts that are generally considered uncivil. Incivility is an issue on the global stage. Social media and the web give people the ability to freely exchange ideas, but this has not come without consequences.