Hubbry Logo
Handicap (golf)Handicap (golf)Main
Open search
Handicap (golf)
Community hub
Handicap (golf)
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Handicap (golf)
Handicap (golf)
from Wikipedia

A golf handicap is a numerical measure of a golfer's ability, or potential ability, that is used to enable players of different abilities to compete against one another. Better players are those with the lowest handicaps.[1][2][3]

Historically, rules relating to handicaps have varied from country to country with many different systems in force around the world. Because of incompatibilities and difficulties in translating between systems, the sport's governing bodies, the USGA and The R&A, working with the various existing handicapping authorities, devised a new World Handicap System (WHS) which began to be introduced globally in 2020.[4][5]

History

[edit]

The earliest record of golf handicapping is thought to be from the late 17th century, in a diary kept by Thomas Kincaid, who was a student in Edinburgh, Scotland, although the word handicap would not come into use in golf until the late 19th century. The number of strokes to be given and the holes on which they would be in effect was negotiated between competing golfers prior to the start of play. According to The Golfer's Manual by Henry Brougham Farnie, examples of agreed terms included "third-one" (one stroke every three holes), "half-one" (one stroke every two holes), "one more" (a stroke a hole) and "two more" (two strokes a hole).[6][7]

During the late 19th century, taking the difference between the average of a golfer's best three scores during the year and par became the most widely used method of handicapping in England and Scotland. As the sport grew, so did discontent with the fairness of handicapping, with less proficient players being particularly unhappy as it was much less likely for them to play to the standard of their three-score average. Another issue was the lack of consideration in the system for the varying difficulties of different courses which meant the handicap was not very portable.[8]

In an attempt to remedy the problems with the basic handicap system and the many variations being used, the authorities in Great Britain and Ireland sought to standardize. One of the first standard and equitable handicap systems was introduced by the Ladies Golf Union (LGU) in the 1890s. This was largely achieved by means of union-assigned course ratings, instead of clubs using their own. It was not until the formation of the British Golf Unions Joint Advisory Committee in 1924 that the men's game fully coordinated to create an equitable handicap system, that included a uniform course rating, throughout Great Britain and Ireland; the Standard Scratch Score and Handicapping Scheme was introduced in 1926.[9][10]

In the United States, there was a single authority governing the sport, the USGA, which made moving to a single standard handicapping scheme somewhat easier. Introduced in 1911, the first national handicap system was based on the British three-score average system. The biggest development was a "par rating" system that assessed the average good score of a scratch golfer on every course, which made the handicap more portable. It also made clear that a player's handicap was intended to reflect their potential rather than average play. Having initially allowed clubs to determine their own par ratings, the USGA quickly changed their minds and began assigning ratings. The USGA Handicap System has further developed through the years, with an increase in the number of scores used for handicap calculations, the introduction of Equitable Stroke Control,[11] and improvements to the course rating system. However, the most significant change was the creation of the slope rating system, which enabled handicaps to account for differences in difficulty between scratch and bogey golfers. USGA Course and Slope Ratings now form the basis of many other handicap systems.[12]

As the sport grew globally, associations around the world each created or adapted their own rules relating to handicaps. By the early 21st century, there were six major recognized handicapping systems in operation around the world: USGA Handicap System, EGA Handicap System, CONGU Unified Handicap System, Golf Australia Handicap System, South African Handicap System, and Argentinian Handicap System. While these systems share some common features, e.g. most use a common course rating system, they are not easily portable because their differences create difficulties in converting handicaps between systems. In order to eliminate these problems the USGA and The R&A, working with the various existing handicapping authorities, devised a new World Handicap System which was phased in globally in 2020.[4][5]

Overview

[edit]

Amateur golfers who are members of golf clubs are generally eligible for official handicaps on payment of the prevailing regional and national association annual fees. Official handicaps are administered by golf clubs with the associations often providing additional peer reviewing for low handicaps. Other systems, often free of charge, are available to golfers who are ineligible for official handicaps. Handicap systems are not generally used in professional golf. A golfer whose handicap is zero is referred to as a scratch golfer, and one whose handicap is approximately 18 as a bogey golfer.[13]

While the USGA administers its own handicapping system, the administration of handicapping systems in countries affiliated to The R&A is the responsibility of the national golf associations of those countries. These bodies have different methods of producing handicaps but they are all generally based on calculating an individual player's playing ability from their recent history of rounds. Therefore, a handicap is not fixed but is regularly adjusted to increases or decreases in a player's scoring. Some systems (e.g. World Handicap System, USGA, European Golf Association) involve calculation of a playing handicap which is dependent on the course being played and set of tees that are being used, whereas others (e.g. CONGU's Unified Handicap System) just use the allocated handicap rounded to the nearest whole number.

Contrary to popular opinion, a player's handicap is intended to reflect a player's potential or "average best", not a player's overall average score. Statistically, low handicappers will play to their handicap more often because they are likely to be more consistent than higher handicappers.

Features of handicapping systems

[edit]

Scoring

[edit]

The total number of strokes taken for a hole (or round) before accounting for a golfer's handicap is called the gross score for that hole (or round), and the number of strokes taken after subtracting any handicap allowance is called the net score.[14]

Note that the gross score in 'world handicap system' is calculated as the number of strokes taken for a hole + the handicap allowance for that hole. The adjusted gross score in 'world handicap system' is the gross score adjusted such that the maximum on any particular hole is the number of strokes taken for a hole + the handicap allowance for that hole + 2 strokes (i.e. net double bogey).

In handicap stroke play competitions, a golfer's playing handicap is subtracted from the total number of strokes taken to produce a net score, which is then used to determine the final results. In handicap Stableford competitions, a player's handicap is distributed according to predetermined hole ratings (stroke index) and strokes deducted accordingly from each hole score before calculating the points for that hole. In match play, the handicap difference between players (or teams) is used to determine the number of strokes the high handicap player should receive from the low handicapper during the playing of their round; each of these strokes are received on the lowest numbered stroke index holes.[14] Stroke allowances may sometimes be reduced by a set percentage in order to maintain the level playing field; this is especially common in pairs and team competitions.

Course Rating

[edit]

Course Rating, (Standard) Scratch Score, Scratch Rating, and Standard Rating are largely equivalent ratings that are used to indicate the average "good score" by a scratch golfer for a set of tees on a golf course. For a par 72 course, the course rating is generally between 67 and 77. There are different methods of calculating the Course Rating, with the length of the course and its obstacles being the biggest factors. Some systems use only these two, or even length alone, but most modern handicapping systems now use the USGA Course Rating system which assesses the difficulty of all aspects of the course, e.g. altitude, wide or narrow fairways, length of any rough, the size and contours of the greens, etc.[15][16]

Some handicapping systems provide for an adjustment to the course rating to account for variations in playing conditions on any given day, e.g. course setup and weather, and it is against this adjusted rating that handicaps are assessed and maintained. Examples of adjusted ratings are Playing Conditions Calculation (World Handicap System), Competition Scratch Score (CONGU Unified Handicapping System), Daily Scratch Rating (Golf Australia Handicap System), and Calculated Rating (South African Handicap System).

Analogous to course rating is the bogey rating, which is a measure of the playing difficulty of a course for a bogey golfer.

Slope Rating

[edit]

Devised by the USGA, the Slope Rating of a golf course describes the relative difficulty of a course for a bogey golfer compared to a scratch golfer. Slope Ratings are in the range 55 to 155, with a course of standard relative difficulty having a rating of 113; the higher the number, the more relatively difficult the course is.

Playing or course handicap

[edit]

In most major handicapping systems, a golfer does not use their exact handicap (or handicap index) directly, but use it to produce their playing or course handicap. For some systems, this means simply rounding the exact handicap to the nearest whole number; however, systems that use slope ratings require a more complex calculation to produce a course handicap with some also factoring in the course rating:

or

The USGA and Golf Australia systems use the first calculation; the WHS, EGA, and Golf RSA systems use the second. Under CONGU's Unified Handicapping System the exact handicap is rounded to the nearest whole number to produce the playing handicap, and in the Argentinian system the exact handicap is used directly.

A playing handicap may also refer to the stroke allowance for a given competition dependent on playing format, and is generally calculated as a percentage of the course handicap.

Stroke Index

[edit]

The Stroke Index is a number that has been assigned to each hole on a golf course, and usually printed on the scorecard, to indicate on which holes handicap strokes should be applied. On an 18-hole course, each hole is assigned a different number from 1 to 18 (1 to 9 on a 9-hole course). The lowest numbers are usually given to the holes where a higher handicapper is most likely to benefit, and the highest numbers to the holes they are least likely to benefit. Odd numbers will be allocated to either the first or second 9-holes (and even numbers to the other) to ensure a balanced distribution of handicap strokes, and guidelines generally recommend avoiding having the lowest numbers at the start or end of each nine in order to prevent early stroke allowances in playoffs between golfers with similar handicaps or strokes going unused if they are at the end.[17]

Maximum hole score

[edit]

Most of the commonly used handicap systems seek to reduce the impact of very high scores on one or more individual holes on the calculation and updating of handicaps. This is achieved by setting a maximum score on each hole, which is only used for handicapping purposes; i.e. it is not used for determining results of competitions or matches. This maximum hole score is either a fixed number or a net score relative to par. Equitable Stroke Control (ESC) and net double bogey (also called Stableford Points Adjustments) are the two most common mechanisms for defining a maximum hole score.

Handicap differential

[edit]

Handicap (or score) differentials are a feature of many handicapping systems. They are a standardized measure of a golfers performance, adjusted to take account of the course being played. Normally the overall score will be adjusted prior to the calculation, e.g. by means of ESC or net double bogey. The course rating may also be adjusted to take account of conditions on the day.

For handicapping systems that use course and slope ratings, a typical calculation using the score (see above) is as follows:

The differentials are used both to calculate initial handicaps and maintain existing ones, by taking a mean average of a set number of the best recent differentials (e.g. the USGA system uses the best 10 differentials from the last 20 scores).

For other handicapping systems, the differentials are simply the difference between the (adjusted) gross or net scores and a specified standard rating (e.g. course rating, standard scratch score, etc.), and they are used in different ways to maintain handicaps.

Peer review

[edit]

In golf clubs, peer review is usually managed by an elected Handicap Secretary who, supported by a small committee, conducts an Annual Review of the handicaps of all members and assesses ad hoc requests from individual members (usually when age or medium to long-term infirmity affects their playing ability). This gives uniformity to handicapping across their club for the setting and maintenance of handicaps with the objective of establishing fair competition between golfers of all abilities.

At the regional level, peer review is extended to include rigorous validation of the handicap returns of low handicap golfers. This ensures that only golfers of an appropriate standard gain entry to their elite tournaments. Occasionally, golfers are excluded from the elite game as a consequence of being found to abuse the system. To a degree, these regional bodies also monitor the performance of and provide training for Handicap Secretaries at the club level.

Nationally, the peer review is extended further to assessing golfers from external jurisdictions for their suitability for entry into their elite international events. They also play a large part in periodic reviews of the handicapping system itself to improve it for the future.

Handicapping systems

[edit]

World Handicap System

[edit]

Due to the many different handicapping systems in use around the world, and the many inconsistencies within them, which makes it difficult to compete on an equal footing where another handicap system is in use, the sports major governing bodies, in 2011 The R&A and the USGA began work on creation of a single uniform handicapping system to be used everywhere.[18] In February 2018, they announced that the World Handicap System (WHS) would be launched in 2020.[19] Once introduced, the World Handicap System will continue to be governed by The R&A and the USGA with the six existing major handicapping authorities (the USGA, the Council of National Golf Unions (CONGU) in Great Britain and Ireland, the European Golf Association (EGA), Golf Australia, the South African Golf Association (SAGA), and the Argentine Golf Association (AAG)) administering the system at a local level.[20][18]

The WHS is based on the USGA Course and Slope Rating system, and largely follows the USGA Handicap System while also incorporating features from the six major existing handicap systems. For example, 8 differentials (like the Golf Australia system) are used after net double bogey adjustments (like the CONGU and EGA systems) for handicap calculations, and the WHS course/playing handicap includes a course rating adjustment (like the EGA system).[20] For players with current handicaps, their handicap records in the old systems will be used to produce WHS handicaps; the expectation is that most players will at most see a difference of one or two strokes, if any.

A new WHS handicap requires several scores to be submitted; the recommendation is a minimum of 54 holes made up of any number of 9 or 18-hole rounds in order to achieve a reasonable fair and accurate result, although handicaps may be issued from a smaller sample. Handicap adjustments will be made upon submission of any 9 or 18-hole scores with updates published daily; unlike some other systems both competitive and recreational rounds may be submitted by all players (e.g. CONGU's Unified Handicapping System only allows submission of non-qualifying scores by golfers in Category 2 or above). Ongoing handicaps are based on the average of the best 8 differentials, but with an "anchor" to prevent rapid increases that would not necessarily reflect the player's true potential. There is also a hole limit of "net double bogey" for handicapping purposes in order to prevent one or two bad holes from having a disproportionate effect.[18]

World Handicap System overview

[edit]

A WHS handicap is calculated with a specific arithmetic formula that approximates how many strokes above or below par a player might be able to play, based on the eight best scores of their last twenty rounds.[21] The calculation has several variables, including: the player's scores from their most recent rounds, the course rating, and the slope rating.

A score differential is calculated from each of the scores after any net double bogey adjustments (an adjustment which allows for a maximum number of strokes per hole based on the player's course handicap) have been applied, using the following formula:

Only 18-hole differentials are used for the calculation of a handicap index. As such, 9-hole differentials need to be combined before being used, subject to remaining one of the 20 most recent differentials. The system also allows for situations where less than 18 (or 9) hole have been played, subject to a minimum of 14 (or 7) holes having been completed, by "scaling up" with net pars for any missing holes.

The score differentials are rounded to one decimal place, and the best 8 from the last 20 submitted scores are then averaged and rounded to one decimal place to produce the handicap index. Initial handicaps are calculated from a minimum of five scores using adjustments that limit each hole score to a maximum of . If there are at least 5 but fewer than 20 qualifying scores available, the handicap index is calculated using a set number or differentials according to how many scores are available, with an additional adjustment made to that average in some circumstances.

Number of rounds Differentials to use Adjustment to average
3 lowest 1 -2.0
4 lowest 1 -1.0
5 lowest 1 0
6 lowest 2 -1.0
7 or 8 lowest 2 0
9 to 11 lowest 3 0
12 to 14 lowest 4 0
15 or 16 lowest 5 0
17 or 18 lowest 6 0
19 lowest 7 0

The basic formula for calculating the handicap index is as follows (where is the number of differentials to use), with the result rounded to one decimal place:

The handicap index is not used directly for playing purposes, but used to calculate a course handicap according to the slope rating of the set of tees being used with an adjustment based on the difference between the course rating and par. The result is rounded to the nearest whole number. For competitions, the unrounded course handicap is converted to a playing handicap by applying a handicap allowance, dependent on the format of play.

The WHS contains measures to reduce a handicap index more quickly in the case of exceptional scoring, and also to prevent a handicap index from rising too quickly. This is done by means of "soft" and "hard" caps based on the lowest index during the previous 365 days; the soft cap reduces increases above 3.0 to 50%, and the hard cap limits increases to 5.0. Updates to a golfer's handicap index are issued daily.

Many elements of WHS have flexibility which allows for local authorities to determine their own settings, but the basic handicap index calculation remains the same. Examples include: 9-hole scores may be scaled-up rather than combined; may be omitted from the course handicap calculation; and the rounded course handicap may be used in the playing handicap calculation.[22]

USGA Handicap System

[edit]

The first handicap system to be introduced by the USGA was largely the work of Leighton Calkins, who based it on the British "three-score average" system where the handicap was calculated as the average of the best three scores to par in the last year. The key difference was the introduction of a par rating (later known as course rating), which was based on the ability of leading amateur Jerome Travers, to account for variances in the playing difficulty of different courses. After initially allowing clubs to determine their own ratings, at the behest of Calkins the USGA quickly began assigning ratings centrally. Course ratings were rounded to the nearest whole number until 1967, when they started being given to one decimal place.[11]

In 1947, the number of scores used to calculate handicaps was increased to the best 10 from all scores ever recorded subject to a minimum of 50. However this was not uniformly implemented, with regional associations disagreeing on the total number of rounds to be considered. In 1958, the USGA specified that the best 10 from 25 scores would be used. This was reduced to 10 from 20 in 1967, which remains to this day although a further adjustment was made with the introduction of a "Bonus of Excellence" multiplier to equalize handicaps and give better players a marginal advantage. Originally 85%, the multiplier was changed to 96% after being seen to favor better players too heavily. In 1974, Equitable Stroke Control was adopted in order to eliminate the effect of very high individual hole scores on handicap calculations.[11]

With the system still not accounting for variances in playing difficulty for golfers of different abilities, in 1979 the USGA set to work on how to address the issue with the creation of the Handicap Research Team. The result of their work was the creation of what is now the Slope system. Slope was gradually introduced, firstly in Colorado in 1982, before being implemented nationally from 1987. The USGA then set about making further refinements to the course rating system, which at the time was still largely dependent on length, to take account of many other factors affecting scoring ability for a scratch golfer.[12] The USGA Course and Slope Rating system is now used by most of the world's major handicapping systems.[20]

The USGA Handicap System is used throughout the jurisdiction of the USGA (i.e. the United States and Mexico), and is also licensed for use in many other countries around the world, e.g. Canada.[23] The USGA has often resorted to the courts to protect the integrity of its handicap system. In one such case, the California Court of Appeal (First District) summarized the system's history:

The USGA was founded in 1894. One of its chief contributions to the game of golf in the United States has been its development and maintenance since 1911 of the USGA handicap system ... designed to enable individual golf players of different abilities to compete fairly with one another. Because permitting individual golfers to issue their handicaps to themselves would inevitably lead to inequities and abuse, the peer review provided by authorized golf clubs and associations has always been an essential part of the [system]. Therefore, to protect the integrity and credibility of its [handicap system], the USGA has consistently followed a policy of only permitting authorized golf associations and clubs to issue USGA handicaps ... In 1979, USGA assembled a handicap research team to investigate widespread criticisms of USGA's then-existing handicap formula. The research team invested approximately a decade and up to $2 million conducting intensive analysis and evaluation of the various factors involved in developing a more accurate and satisfactory [system]. As a result, the research team developed new handicap formulas ... designed to measure the overall difficulty of golf courses, compare individual golfers with other golfers of all abilities, take account of differences between tournament and casual play, and adjust aberrant scores on individual holes. USGA subsequently adopted and implemented these new [f]ormulas between 1987 and 1993.[24]

USGA Handicap System overview

[edit]

A USGA handicap is calculated with a specific arithmetic formula that approximates how many strokes above or below par a player might be able to play, based on the ten best scores of their last twenty rounds.[25] The calculation has several variables: the player's scores from their most recent rounds, and the course and slope ratings from those rounds.

A handicap differential is calculated from each of the scores after Equitable Stroke Control (ESC), an adjustment which allows for a maximum number of strokes per hole based on the player's course handicap, has been applied using the following formula:

The handicap differentials are rounded to one decimal place, and the best 10 from the last 20 submitted scores are then averaged, before being multiplied by 0.96 (the "bonus of excellence") and truncated to one decimal place to produce the handicap index. Initial handicaps are calculated from a minimum of five scores using ESC adjustments based on the course handicap corresponding to a handicap index of 36.4 for men or 40.4 for women. If there are at least 5 but fewer than 20 qualifying scores available, the handicap index is calculated using a set number or differentials according to how many scores are available.[26]

Number of rounds Differentials to use
5 or 6 lowest 1
7 or 8 lowest 2
9 or 10 lowest 3
11 or 12 lowest 4
13 or 14 lowest 5
15 or 16 lowest 6
17 lowest 7
18 lowest 8
19 lowest 9

The basic formula for calculating the handicap index is as follows (where is the number of differentials to use), with the result truncated to one decimal place:

The handicap index is not used directly for playing purposes, but used to calculate a course handicap according to the slope rating of the set of tees being used. The result is rounded to the nearest whole number.[3]

Updates to a golfer's handicap index are issued periodically, generally once or twice per month depending on the local state and regional golf associations.[20]

CONGU Unified Handicapping System

[edit]

Following a meeting of the four men's golf unions of Great Britain and Ireland in York arranged by The Royal and Ancient Golf Club of St Andrews in 1924, the British Golf Unions Joint Advisory Committee (later Council of National Golf Unions) was formed. The organization was tasked with creating a handicapping system that would be equitable to golfers of varying ability, and as a result the Standard Scratch Score and Handicapping Scheme was devised. The system was introduced in 1926, and used a "scratch score" system to rate courses, taking account that courses may play easier or more difficult than par.[9]

A new system was introduced in 1983, which incorporated features of the Australian system. This was further revised in 1989 with the introduction of the Competition Scratch Score (CSS), an adjustment to the Standard Scratch Score (SSS), to take account of variances in course conditions (setup, weather, etc.) on a given day.[2] Further significant changes came in 1993 (buffer zones) and 1997 (Stableford Points Adjustment). In 2002, the Council of National Golf Unions (CONGU) and the Ladies' Golf Union (LGU) began working together (the LGU had adopted a system similar to that of CONGU in 1998) and in February 2004 the Unified Handicapping System (UHS) came into force.[9]

The Unified Handicapping System is used to manage handicaps for both men and women who are members of affiliated golf clubs in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. The system is published by CONGU and administered by each of the individual unions on behalf of their members,[27] with handicaps being managed locally by someone at each club; this person normally holds the position of competitions or handicap secretary.

Unified Handicapping System overview

[edit]

Under the Unified Handicapping System, initial handicaps are allocated based on returned scores from 54 holes, usually three 18-hole rounds.[27] The number of strokes taken on each hole is adjusted to maximum of double the par of the hole before adding up the scores; adjustments were previously 2 over par for men and 3 over par for women.[28] The best of the "adjusted gross differentials" (AGD) between the adjusted score and the Standard Scratch Score (SSS) is taken to calculate the initial handicap using the following formula, with the result truncated to give a whole number:

Adjustments may be made to the initial handicap should it be deemed necessary to ensure it is reasonably fair. Handicaps are given to one decimal place and divided into categories with the lowest handicaps being in Category 1. Prior to 2018, the highest handicaps were in Category 4 for men, with a maximum of 28.0, and Category 5 for women, with a maximum of 36.0, with provision for higher "club" or "disability" handicaps up to a limit of 54.0 for those who cannot play to these lower limits.[28] In 2018, handicap limits were standardized at 54.0 and a Category 5 was introduced for men, and a new Category 6 for all, replacing the club and disability category (see table below). The exact handicap is rounded to the nearest whole number to give the playing handicap.[29] Many handicap competitions still have maximum limits of 28 for men and 36 for women.

For all qualifying scores that are returned, adjustments are made to a players exact handicap based on the Competition Scratch Score (CSS). All hole scores are first adjusted to a maximum of net 2-over par with handicap strokes being used per the stroke index published on the scorecard; this is called Stableford or net double-bogey adjustment. Every stroke the adjusted net score is below the CSS triggers a reduction dependent on the players handicap category; for Category 1 this is 0.1 per stroke, for Category 2 it is 0.2, etc. Should the adjusted net score exceed the CSS , there is a buffer zone equivalent to the handicap category before a 0.1 increase is applied, which is the same for all categories; for Category 1 there is 1 stroke buffer, for Category 2 it is 2 strokes, etc.[2] The Competition Scratch Score is an adjustment to the Standard Scratch Score computed from all scores returned and is in the range to with provision for "reduction only" when scoring conditions have proved especially difficult.[29]

Category Exact
handicap
Playing
handicap
Reduction per stroke
better than CSS
Increase for scores
exceeding CSS + buffer
Buffer
1 ≤5.4 ≤5 0.1 0.1 1 stroke
2 5.5 to 12.4 6 to 12 0.2 0.1 2 strokes
3 12.5 to 20.4 13 to 20 0.3 0.1 3 strokes
4 20.5 to 28.4 21 to 28 0.4 0.1 4 strokes
5 28.5 to 36.4 29 to 36 0.5 0.1 5 strokes
6 36.5 to 54.0 37 to 54 0.6 0.1 6 strokes

In addition to playing in qualifying competitions, golfers in Category 2 and above may also submit a number of supplementary scores in order to maintain their handicap; primarily a feature to accommodate golfers who play in few competitions and allow them to maintain current handicaps, it is also used by people who wish to try and get their handicap down while they are playing well. There are other mechanisms in the system to reduce or increase handicaps more quickly. Every year all handicaps are reviewed and adjusted if necessary to ensure they remain fair and accurate. In addition, any very good scores are monitored throughout the year and an exceptional scoring reduction may be applied if certain triggers are reached.

Historically calculating the CSS and any handicap adjustments was done manually by means of published tables, but this is now computerized with handicaps being published to a Centralised Database of Handicaps (CDH).

EGA Handicap System

[edit]

The EGA Handicap System is the European Golf Association's method of evaluating golf abilities so that players of different standards can compete in handicap events on equal terms. It is based on Stableford scoring and has some similarities to both the CONGU system, with regards to handicap categories and adjustments, and to the USGA system, with regards to the use of course and slope ratings and calculating playing handicaps. The first version of the system was introduced in 2000.[30]

EGA Handicap System overview

[edit]

Under the EGA Handicap System, initial handicaps require just a single 9 or 18-hole score recorded using the maximum handicap of 54. The handicap is then calculated from the number of Stableford points scored.

EGA handicaps are given to one decimal place and divided into categories, with the lowest handicaps being in Category 1 and the highest in Category 6 (see table below). The handicap is not used directly for playing purposes and a calculation must be done to determine a "playing handicap" specific to the course being played and set of tees being used. For handicaps in categories 1 to 5, the formula is as follows with the result rounded to the nearest whole number:

And for category 6 a "playing handicap differential" is used, which is equal to the playing handicap for a handicap index of 36.0:

For all qualifying scores that are returned, adjustments are made to a players handicap index. All scores are first converted into Stableford points if necessary (i.e. rounds played using another scoring method, e.g. stroke play), effectively applying a net double bogey adjustment, and then for every point scored above the buffer zone there is a reduction applied to the players handicap index according to their handicap category; for Category 1 this is 0.1 per point, for Category 2 it is 0.2, etc. Should the number of points scored be below the buffer zone, a fixed increase of 0.1 is applied to the handicap index regardless of category. The EGA system also takes account of variations in playing difficulty on any given competition day by means of a Computed Buffer Adjustment (CBA) which adjusts the buffer zones by between −1 and +2 with provision for "reductions only" when scoring is especially difficult.[31] The CBA replaced the previous Competition Stableford Adjustment method, which adjusted player's Stableford scores directly, in 2013.[32]

Category Handicap index Buffer zone
(Stableford points)
Reduction per point scored
in excess of the buffer zone
Increase for scores
below the buffer zone
1 ≤4.4 35–36 0.1 0.1
2 4.5 to 11.4 34–36 0.2 0.1
3 11.5 to 18.4 33–36 0.3 0.1
4 18.5 to 26.4 32–36 0.4 0.1
5 26.5 to 36.0 31–36 0.5 0.1
6 ≥37 - 1.0 -

In addition to playing in qualifying competitions, golfers in Category 2 and above may also submit a number of extra day scores in order to maintain their handicap. Handicaps are also reviewed annually and any necessary adjustments made.[31]

Golf Australia Handicap System

[edit]

The Golf Australia Handicap System is maintained on GOLF Link, which was a world-first computerized handicapping system developed by Golf Australia's predecessor, the Australian Golf Union (AGU) in the 1990s. When GOLF Link was first introduced it contained two key characteristics that set it apart from other world handicapping systems at the time:

  1. It used a Calculated Course Rating (CCR) to determine how difficult the course was on the day, and upon which handicap adjustment was made.
  2. It utilized a 'swipe' card that enabled a player to access their handicap from any GOLF Link terminal in Australia.

In April 2010 GA adopted the USGA calculation method using the average of the best 10 differentials of the player's past 20 total rounds, multiplied by 0.96. In September 2011 this was altered to the best 8 out of 20 rounds, multiplied by 0.93. The reasons for these changes were cited to restore equity between high and low handicaps. An ‘anchor' so that handicaps could not increase by more than 5 in a rolling 12-month period, slope ratings, and a more sophisticated version of CCR called the Daily Scratch Rating (DSR) were implemented on January 23, 2014.[33][34][35]

GA Handicap System overview

[edit]

The GA Handicap System is based on the Stableford scoring system, and uses slope and course rating (called "Scratch Rating"). For handicapping purposes, the scratch rating is adjusted to reflect scoring conditions ("Daily Scratch Rating"), and all scores are converted into Stableford points, called the Stableford Handicap Adjustment (SHA) and inherently applying net double bogey adjustments, regardless of the scoring system being used while playing.[33]

Handicaps are calculated from the best 8 adjusted differentials, called "sloped played to" results, from the most recent 20 scores. Should there be 3 or more but fewer than 20 scores available, a specified number of "sloped played to" results are used, per the table below.[36]

Number of scores "Sloped played to"
results to use
3 to 6 lowest 1
7 or 8 lowest 2
9 or 10 lowest 3
11 or 12 lowest 4
13 or 14 lowest 5
15 or 16 lowest 6
17 or 18 lowest 7
19 or 20 lowest 8

New handicaps require 3 18-hole scores to be submitted (or any combination of 9 and 18-hole scores totaling 54 holes played) using a "Temporary Daily Handicap" of 36 for men or 45 for women in order to calculate the necessary "sloped played to" results. "Sloped played to" results are calculated using the following formula and rounded to one decimal place:[36]

To calculate the GA handicap, the "sloped played to" results are averaged and multiplied by a factor of 0.93, which is intended to equalize the handicap in favor of better players. The formula for calculating a GA handicap is as follows (where is the number of differentials to use), with the result truncated to one decimal place:[36]

The GA handicap is used to create a "daily handicap", specific to the course and set of tees being used, using the following formula with the result rounded to the nearest whole number:[36]

South African Handicap System

[edit]

Before 2018, the South African Handicap System used a proprietary course rating system without slope, called Standard Rating, which included specific calculations for length and altitude. Handicaps were calculated using the best 10 from the last 20 differentials, with differentials derived by means of a simple (Standard Rating − Adjusted Gross) formula. The system previously calculated handicaps against an adjusted Standard Rating (called Calculated Rating) but this was suspended in 2012.[37] Playing handicaps were simply the exact handicap, rounded to the nearest whole number.[38]

In September 2018, the renamed GolfRSA Handicap System adopted the USGA Course and Slope Rating system. This necessitated a few additional changes (e.g. playing handicap and differential calculations), but the system retained all other features (e.g. Adjusted Gross and no daily course rating adjustment). The playing handicap under the GolfRSA system includes the difference between the Course Rating and Par.[39]

In October 2019, further changes were made which brought the GolfRSA Handicap System further into line with the upcoming World Handicap System. The changes introduced included reducing the number of differentials used in handicap calculations from 10 down to 8, net double bogey as the maximum score per hole, reducing the minimum number of valid 18-hole scores required for handicapping to three, and exceptional scoring reductions.[40]

Argentinian Handicap System

[edit]

The Argentine Golf Association (AAG) handicapping system is a relatively simple one, using only a course rating, without slope. New handicaps require the submission of scorecards from five 18-hole rounds (or ten 9-hole rounds). An initial handicap of 25 is normally used as a starting point, which is then adjusted based on the submitted scores. Handicaps are updated once every month, with current handicaps generated from a lookup table using the average of the best eight differentials from the last 16 rounds. Golfers simply use their exact handicap for playing purposes.[20][41]

Other systems

[edit]

For the handicapping of golfers who are ineligible for an official handicap, some system options are available:

Peoria System

[edit]

The Peoria System[42] was designed for the handicapping of all players competing in an event such as a charity or corporate golf day. Before play commences, the organisers secretly select 6 holes (in readiness for handicapping purposes later) from the course to be played. When players have completed their rounds, they apply the Peoria algorithm to their scores on the selected holes to determine their handicap for that round. They then subtract that handicap from their gross score to give their net score - and the winner is determined in the usual way.[43]

Callaway System

[edit]

The Callaway System[44] was designed with the same objective as Peoria. The Callaway handicapping algorithm works by totaling a variable number of "worst" scores achieved (subject to a double-par limit) according to a simple table. A couple of adjustments are then made to this total to give the player's handicap, which is then applied to their gross score as normal.[43]

Scheid System

[edit]

The Scheid System[45] is similar to the Callaway System, except a different version of the table is used.[43]

System 36

[edit]

System 36[46] is a same-day handicapping system similar in function to Callaway System and Peoria System. Throughout the round, the golfer accrues points based on the following formula:

  • Double bogey or worse: 0 points
  • Bogey: 1 point
  • Par or better: 2 points

At the end of the round, points earned are tallied. The total is subtracted from 36, and the resulting number is the golfer's handicap allowance. The golfer's net score can then be computed using their System 36 handicap allowance.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In golf, a handicap is a numerical measure of a golfer's demonstrated potential ability, enabling players of varying skill levels to compete fairly by adjusting scores based on course difficulty. The current global standard, the World Handicap System (WHS), was introduced in 2020 by the United States Golf Association (USGA) and The R&A, with revisions in 2024 and 2025, unifying six previous regional systems into a single, consistent framework used in 132 countries. The primary purpose of the WHS is to promote equity and enjoyment in the game by allowing golfers to play and compete on a level basis, regardless of format, course conditions, or location. It achieves this through the Rules of Handicapping and the Course Rating System, which together provide a portable Handicap Index that reflects a player's under normal playing conditions. Unlike earlier systems, the WHS emphasizes and portability, ensuring that handicaps remain valid worldwide without requiring extensive recalibration. To establish a Handicap Index, a player must join an authorized and submit at least 54 holes of acceptable scores, which can include combinations of 9-hole and 18-hole rounds; the index is then calculated daily using the best eight score differentials from the most recent 20 rounds. A score differential is derived by subtracting the course rating from the player's adjusted gross score and adjusting for the (a measure of course difficulty relative to a bogey golfer), using the formula: (adjusted gross score - course rating) × 113 / slope rating. Scores are capped at net double bogey per hole to prevent outliers from skewing the index. The Handicap Index translates into a Course Handicap for specific play, which determines the number of strokes a player receives on a given course and set of tees, calculated as (Handicap Index × slope / 113) rounded to the nearest whole number, with further adjustments possible for playing conditions. This allows for net scoring in competitions, where strokes are allocated based on hole handicaps to equalize play. The system supports various formats, from to , and is updated in real-time via apps or services like GHIN, ensuring accessibility for both and golfers.

Overview

Purpose and Benefits

A golf handicap serves as a numerical measure of a player's potential ability, representing the number of strokes they are expected to take above or below the course rating on a course of standard difficulty, which enables net scoring by subtracting this value from the gross score to create a fair comparison across skill levels. The primary purpose of the handicap system is to promote equitable competition and enhance the enjoyment of for players of varying abilities, allowing them to compete on a level playing field in recreational settings or formal tournaments regardless of course conditions or format. By standardizing play, it fosters inclusivity, encouraging participation from beginners to experts, while also motivating skill improvement through the tracking of progress via the , a portable measure of ability. The concept, similar to that used in 18th-century horse racing where weights were assigned to horses to equalize chances, was first applied to golf in informal games as early as the 17th century, with the earliest documented reference appearing in a diary entry describing stroke allowances. In practice, handicaps adjust competition formats effectively; for instance, in match play, the higher-handicap player receives strokes on the most difficult holes as determined by the course's stroke index, potentially giving them an advantage on those holes to offset skill differences. In stroke play events, players compute net scores by deducting their full handicap from the total strokes, allowing awards based on these adjusted totals rather than raw performance, which broadens prize eligibility.

Basic Principles

In golf, the handicap system distinguishes between gross scoring, which records a player's actual number of strokes taken on each hole and for the round, and net scoring, which subtracts the player's allocated handicap strokes from the gross score to level the playing field. Handicap strokes are allocated to the most difficult holes on the course, as determined by the stroke index—a ranking of holes from 1 (hardest) to 18 (easiest) based on relative difficulty for bogey golfers. In match play or stroke play competitions, a player receives these strokes on the designated holes, allowing higher-handicap players to deduct one stroke per allocated hole up to their full entitlement, promoting equitable competition regardless of skill disparity. The validity of a handicap relies on the principle of , where fellow players certify the accuracy of submitted scores to prevent manipulation and ensure integrity. Players must submit all acceptable scores— from both competitive rounds and general play—promptly to an authorized body, such as a national association or its affiliated system like the USGA's GHIN platform, which maintains the official scoring record. This submission process, overseen by a Handicap Committee, allows for review and potential adjustment of scores or indices if discrepancies arise, fostering trust in the system's fairness. Course difficulty normalization under the World Handicap System (WHS) ensures that a player's Handicap Index remains portable and comparable across different venues by adjusting for variations in course challenges through factors like Course Rating and . This portability enables golfers to compete equitably worldwide without recalibrating their measure for each location. Handicap categories range from 0 (scratch golfer, playing to course par) to a maximum of 54 for beginners or higher-skilled novices, with plus handicaps for those better than scratch; these categories determine competition eligibility, such as entry into divisions or tournaments tailored to skill levels, while capping the maximum promotes inclusivity for all .

History

Early Development

The concept of handicapping in golf emerged in the mid-19th century as a means to level the playing field among players of varying abilities, with the term "handicap" entering the golf lexicon in British clubs during the 1870s, borrowed from a contemporary involving weighted odds. One of the earliest formal implementations occurred at the , founded in 1869, where in 1871 a dedicated handicap committee was established to assign stroke allowances based on assessments of playing ability, allowing scratches for top players while granting concessions to others based on collective judgment. This approach reflected the informal, subjective nature of early , often negotiated for matches rather than systematically calculated, yet it marked a shift toward organized equity in club competitions. By the late , as golf's popularity surged in Britain, inconsistencies in handicap portability across clubs prompted calls for standardization, culminating in 1891 when H.H. Turner of Greenwich proposed the formation of a national Golfing Association to create a uniform system. Turner's initiative advocated for percentage-based allowances adjusted relative to course difficulties, aiming to equate handicaps like a 7 at one venue to a 9 at another, addressing complaints that existing methods—such as averaging a player's best three scores—favored elite competitors and lacked transparency. Although not immediately adopted, this push highlighted growing demand for equitable, mathematical procedures over arbitrary assignments, influencing subsequent British efforts toward consistency. In the United States, handicapping gained traction alongside golf's expansion, with the (USGA) formally adopting its first national system on October 11, 1911, at , based on the framework developed by Leighton Calkins of the Metropolitan Golf Association. Calkins' method initially relied on club committees for arbitrary assignments but quickly evolved to incorporate score-based calculations, using a player's three best scores from the prior year adjusted against the course's scratch rating to determine allowances. This system emphasized the establishment of handicap committees at each club to oversee assignments and ensure fairness, setting a precedent for data-informed practices. A pivotal advancement came in 1912 when the USGA published its inaugural national handicap list, encompassing 324 member clubs and identifying eligible players for championships like the U.S. Amateur, with a maximum handicap of 6 strokes required for entry. This list introduced the concept of a portable Handicap Index, derived from committee-reviewed scores, which facilitated cross-club competition and laid the groundwork for refinements through ongoing analysis of player data and course variations. These early USGA efforts shifted handicapping from purely subjective judgments to a more empirical foundation, influencing global standards in the decades that followed.

Modern Evolution and Unification

In the mid-20th century, the (USGA) advanced handicap calculations toward a more standardized, formula-based approach to better reflect a player's potential ability rather than average performance. By , the USGA introduced a compromise formula using the best 10 of a player's last 25 scores to compute the handicap, aiming to reduce volatility from poor rounds while maintaining equity. This evolved further in with a refinement to the best 10 of the last 20 scores, incorporating adjustments for course difficulty. In the 1980s, the introduction of the in —fully implemented by —added a relative difficulty factor to the formula, allowing handicaps to adjust dynamically across courses of varying challenge levels. Meanwhile, in the and , the Council of National Golf Unions (CONGU), formed in 1927 to oversee handicapping, developed a unified system with roots in early 20th-century standardization efforts among national unions. This culminated in the CONGU Unified Handicapping System (UHS) in the early 2000s, which formalized an incremental adjustment model based on recent scores and buffer zones to promote consistent competition across regions. By the , growing international play highlighted inconsistencies among national systems, prompting the USGA and to form a joint Handicap Committee in 2011 to pursue global unification. Development accelerated through collaborative consultations, with pilot testing of unified rules beginning in select countries around to refine portability and equity. The World Handicap System (WHS) rolled out globally starting January 2020, replacing disparate national systems—including the USGA's and CONGU's—in over 130 countries by mid-2025 to enable seamless competition worldwide. Initial adoption faced challenges, such as resistance to mandatory score submissions for all rounds and daily Handicap Index updates, which increased administrative demands but aimed to enhance accuracy through more data. Key milestones include 2024 revisions that streamlined 9-hole score treatment by requiring full 9-hole completions with valid ratings (previously allowing 7 holes) and halved minimum course yardages to 1,500 yards for 18 holes and 750 for 9 holes, broadening accessibility for shorter layouts. In 2025, updates introduced greater club flexibility in competition handicap allowances, permitting local adjustments to playing handicaps during events to better suit specific formats while maintaining overall equity.

Core Concepts

Course Rating and Slope Rating

The Course Rating is a numerical value, typically expressed to one decimal place (e.g., 72.5), that represents the expected score for a scratch golfer—defined as a highly skilled player capable of playing to a course par—under normal playing conditions. It is calculated using a standardized USGA formula that accounts for the course's effective playing length, including factors such as yardage, elevation changes, doglegs, and ball roll, as well as obstacle factors like bunkers, water hazards, out-of-bounds areas, trees, rough, and green targets. This rating provides a baseline measure of a course's overall difficulty for expert players, enabling fair comparisons across different venues. The , ranging from 55 to 155 with an average of 113, quantifies the relative difficulty of a course for a bogey golfer—a player with a Handicap Index of about 20 for men or 24 for women—compared to a scratch golfer. It is derived from the : Slope Rating = (Bogey Rating - Course Rating) × 5.381 for men and × 4.24 for women, where the Bogey Rating is the expected score for a bogey golfer under normal conditions. A higher Slope Rating indicates greater escalation in difficulty for average players relative to experts, such as due to challenging or hazards that disproportionately affect non-scratch play. Course Ratings and Slope Ratings are determined by teams of authorized USGA-trained raters, who conduct on-site evaluations for each set of tees on a golf course. The process involves precisely measuring hole lengths, assessing effective playing length adjustments (e.g., wind exposure and forced carries), and rating 10 specific obstacle factors on a scale, including data on green speeds via stimpmeter readings and hazard placements. These ratings are typically reviewed and updated every 10 years or following significant course alterations, such as redesigns or environmental changes, to ensure accuracy in the World Handicap System. For example, a course with a of 140—indicating above-average difficulty for bogey golfers—will result in larger handicap stroke allowances for higher-handicap players compared to one with a of 90, promoting equitable competition. These metrics are essential for adjusting a player's Handicap Index into a playing handicap tailored to specific course conditions.

Handicap Index

The Handicap Index serves as a standardized, portable measure of a golfer's demonstrated playing , enabling equitable across different courses and conditions worldwide under the World Handicap System (WHS). It represents the number of strokes a player is expected to take above or below the course rating on an average day, based on their recent performance adjusted for course difficulty. This index is expressed as a numeric value with one decimal place, ranging from 0.0 to 54.0, and is recalculated frequently—typically upon submission of each new acceptable score—through authorized platforms like the GHIN system. The calculation of the Handicap Index begins with Score Differentials, which normalize each round's adjusted gross score relative to the course's rating and to account for varying difficulty levels. For 9-hole rounds (posted after at least 54 total holes), an 18-hole Score Differential is calculated by combining the actual 9-hole differential with an expected 9-hole differential based on the player's Handicap Index. Once a player has at least 20 acceptable scores in their record, the index is derived by taking the average of the player's best (lowest) 8 Score Differentials from those 20 most recent rounds, then rounding to the nearest tenth. For players with fewer than 20 scores, an initial index can be established after posting scores from at least 54 holes, which can include 9-hole and 18-hole rounds (with each 9-hole score converted to an 18-hole Score Differential using the expected score method for the unplayed 9 holes based on the player's Handicap Index), using a scaled calculation based on the available lowest differentials multiplied by factors that adjust for the smaller sample size to approximate the full method. Exceptional scores, defined as those producing a differential at least 7.0 strokes better than the player's current index, are subject to by another player or the handicap committee to verify authenticity before full incorporation, with any resulting index reduction limited to prevent undue drops. To mitigate volatility from temporary poor form, the WHS incorporates soft and hard caps on upward adjustments to the index. The soft cap activates if the calculated index would exceed the player's lowest index from the preceding 12 months by more than 3.0 strokes, limiting the increase to 50% of the excess amount; the hard cap then prevents any further rise beyond 5.0 strokes above that baseline low index. These safeguards ensure the index remains a reliable reflection of long-term ability rather than short-term fluctuations. Interpretation of the Handicap Index directly correlates with skill level: a value of 0.0 designates a scratch golfer, capable of playing to the course rating on a standard day, while indices above 36.0 typically indicate higher-handicap players who benefit significantly from stroke allowances in net competitions. This metric's portability allows it to be applied universally, fostering fair play in diverse formats from casual rounds to tournaments.

Playing Handicap and Stroke Allocation

The playing handicap represents the number of strokes a player receives or gives away in a specific round or , tailored to the course, tees, and format of play to ensure equitable . It is derived from the player's Handicap Index but adjusted for the relative difficulty of the course and any competition-specific allowances, distinguishing it from the Course Handicap, which solely measures expected performance against the course itself. This adjustment promotes fairness by accounting for variations in playing conditions and game formats, such as or . To calculate the playing handicap under the World Handicap System, first determine the Course Handicap using the formula: Course Handicap = Handicap Index × (Slope Rating ÷ 113), rounded to the nearest whole number (with .5 rounding up). The playing handicap is then obtained by multiplying the Course Handicap by a handicap allowance percentage, which varies by format: typically 100% for match play (full handicap used), 95% for individual stroke play in medium-sized fields (30-100 players), and lower percentages like 85% for four-ball stroke play to maintain equity. For example, a player with a Handicap Index of 15 playing from tees with a Slope Rating of 125 would have a Course Handicap of approximately 17 (15 × 125 ÷ 113 ≈ 16.6, rounded to 17); in a 95% allowance competition, the playing handicap would be 16 (17 × 0.95, rounded). Adjustments may also apply for different tee par values or multi-tee events, but the Slope Rating remains the primary course difficulty factor. Stroke allocation determines which specific holes receive the handicap strokes, based on the playing handicap and the course's —a from 1 to 18 where 1 indicates the most difficult relative to par, and 18 the least. Strokes are allocated starting with the lowest holes: a player with a playing handicap of 10 receives one stroke each on the 10 holes with stroke indices 1 through 10, allowing them to subtract one stroke from their net score on those holes. Courses establish the by dividing the 18 holes into six triads (groups of three consecutive holes or logical segments), each triad's difficulty relative to par, and assigning indices across the front and back nines (odd indices on one nine, even on the other, or vice versa for balance). In , additional strokes beyond the first on a go to progressively higher holes; for instance, a playing handicap of 20 would give two strokes on stroke index 1, two on 2, and one each on 3 through 18. This system ensures strokes are distributed to the hardest holes, enhancing strategic equity without altering the underlying Handicap Index calculation.

Calculation Process

Handicap Differential

The handicap differential, also known as the score differential in the World Handicap System (WHS), quantifies a golfer's on a specific round relative to the course's difficulty, serving as the foundational metric for calculating the Handicap Index. It normalizes scores across different courses by incorporating the Course Rating and , ensuring comparability regardless of playing conditions. The formula for the handicap differential is: Score Differential=113Slope Rating×(Adjusted Gross ScoreCourse RatingPCC Adjustment)\text{Score Differential} = \frac{113}{\text{Slope Rating}} \times (\text{Adjusted Gross Score} - \text{Course Rating} - \text{PCC Adjustment}) where the Adjusted Gross Score (AGS) is the player's gross score after applying the maximum hole score limit, the Course Rating represents the expected score for a scratch golfer, the Slope Rating indicates relative difficulty for a bogey golfer (standardized at 113), and the Playing Conditions Calculation (PCC) adjustment accounts for anomalous weather or course setup impacts, typically ranging from -1.0 to +3.0 strokes but often zero. Unlike net scoring, which subtracts the playing handicap from the gross score to determine performance against par, the differential relies solely on the adjusted gross score minus the Course Rating to isolate the player's ability independent of their current handicap. To compute the AGS, the gross score for each hole is capped at the net double bogey maximum, defined as par of the hole plus 2 strokes plus any handicap strokes the player receives on that hole based on their Course Handicap and the hole's . This equitable stroke control prevents unusually high scores on individual holes from disproportionately inflating the differential, promoting fairness in handicap maintenance; for example, on a par-4 hole with no handicap strokes allocated, the maximum is 6 strokes (double bogey). The PCC adjustment, if applicable, is then subtracted before applying the multiplier. For illustration, consider a golfer posting an adjusted gross score of 85 on a course with a Course Rating of 72.0 and of 120, assuming no PCC adjustment: the differential is (8572)×113/12012.2(85 - 72) \times 113 / 120 \approx 12.2. Each acceptable posted score generates one such differential, which is then used in aggregating the Handicap Index by averaging the best 8 out of the most recent 20 differentials (or fewer with adjustments for limited scores). In cases of incomplete rounds, such as 9-hole scores, the differential is calculated by combining the actual 9-hole adjusted gross score with the player's expected score for the remaining 9 holes—derived from their Handicap Index and the course's ratings—to form an 18-hole equivalent. This approach ensures partial rounds contribute equitably without requiring full 18-hole play.

Score Adjustment and Posting

In the World Handicap System (WHS), all acceptable scores from authorized formats of play, including both competitions and general play, must be submitted for handicap purposes to maintain an accurate Handicap Index. Scores from competitions are typically submitted by the competition organizer, while players are responsible for submitting general play scores promptly through authorized methods such as mobile applications (e.g., the GHIN app) or club handicapping systems. Submission is required as soon as possible after completing the round, ideally before midnight local time on the day of play, to allow inclusion in the daily Playing Conditions Calculation and ensure timely Handicap Index updates; if not submitted on the day of play, scores must be posted no later than the final day of the score submission deadline set by the local handicapping authority. A score is acceptable if it meets WHS criteria, such as being played on a course with a valid Course Rating and , and adhering to the Rules of Golf; for general play, this includes casual rounds where the player follows the expectation of maximum hole scores (net double bogey) and does not accept preferred lies unless permitted by local rules. Nine-hole scores are fully integrated into the system, requiring a minimum of 9 holes played on a rated course, and are automatically converted to an equivalent 18-hole Score Differential for Handicap Index calculation, enabling players to build their scoring record more flexibly without needing to combine rounds manually. To obtain an initial Handicap Index, a player must submit a minimum of 54 holes total, which can be any combination of 9-hole and 18-hole scores (e.g., three 18-hole rounds or six 9-hole rounds); once established, the Index remains valid with ongoing submissions, though it is based on the best 8 of the most recent 20 Score Differentials when at least 20 scores are available. Score adjustments in the WHS primarily occur through the Exceptional Score Reduction (ESR) mechanism, which addresses unusually low scores to prevent Handicap Index inflation. An exceptional score is identified when the Score Differential is at least 7.0 strokes better than the player's Handicap Index at the time of play; in such cases, an automatic adjustment of -1 is applied to each of the player's most recent 20 Score Differentials if the differential is 7.0 to 9.9 strokes better, or -2 if 10.0 strokes or better, effectively reducing the influence of the exceptional performance on future Index calculations. This ESR applies equally to scores from general play and competitions, ensuring consistency across all submitted rounds, and the adjusted differentials are then used in computing the Handicap Index. Unlike Playing Conditions Calculation adjustments for course difficulty, ESR targets individual performance outliers and diminishes over time as new scores are added. The Handicap Committee plays a key role in verifying potentially anomalous scores to uphold the integrity of the system, particularly for exceptional performances that trigger ESR or appear inconsistent with a player's scoring history. Committees are recommended to review players with multiple ESR instances or a single -2.0 adjustment, potentially requiring witness attestations from playing partners or further investigation; if irregularities are confirmed (e.g., failure to adhere to posting rules or suspected impropriety), the committee may revoke the score, adjust the Handicap Index, or impose sanctions, ensuring equitable handicapping. Handicap Index updates occur daily in the WHS, reflecting newly submitted scores and any applicable adjustments like ESR, which allows for responsive tracking of a player's ; however, the Index requires ongoing score submissions to remain current, with validity maintained as long as the minimum initial thresholds are met and scores continue to be posted regularly.

Maximum Hole Scores and Equitable Scoring

In the World Handicap System (WHS), the Maximum Hole Score (MHS) rule caps the score a player can post for handicap purposes on any at a net double bogey. This is calculated as the par of the plus two strokes, plus any handicap strokes the player receives on that specific based on their Playing Handicap and the 's . For example, on a par-4 where a player receives two handicap strokes, the maximum allowable score is 8 (par 4 + 2 for double bogey + 2 handicap strokes). Similarly, for a player with a Course Handicap of 20 on a par-5 allocated two strokes, the maximum is 9 (par 5 + 2 + 2). The MHS rule applies universally to all formats of play, including and , and encourages players to complete every hole rather than picking up after a poor start, as scores beyond the cap do not affect the handicap calculation. Its primary purpose is to promote equitable by mitigating the impact of outlier "blow-up" holes, ensuring that a single disastrous performance does not disproportionately inflate a player's Handicap Index and misrepresent their overall ability. These adjusted hole scores are then incorporated into the total score used to compute the Handicap Differential, providing a more consistent measure of potential. Prior to the WHS implementation in 2020, the (USGA) employed Equitable Stroke Control (ESC) as the method for adjusting hole scores. ESC limited the maximum score per hole based on the player's Course Handicap, using a standardized table to cap scores at a level intended to reflect equitable play without hole-specific adjustments. Under ESC, the maximum scores were as follows for an 18-hole round:
Course HandicapMaximum Score per Hole
0–9Double bogey
10–197
20–298
30–399
40 or more10
For instance, a player with a Course Handicap of 15 would adjust any score over 7 to 7 on a hole, regardless of the hole's par, though the actual cap could be lower if it exceeded double bogey relative to par. This system aimed to prevent high scores from skewing but was criticized for its lack of consistency across holes with varying pars and stroke allocations. The WHS replaced ESC with MHS to introduce greater equity and simplicity, as the net double bogey cap accounts for both the hole's difficulty (via par and allocated ) and the player's ability, resulting in more tailored adjustments. This shift ensures handicaps better represent scoring potential under normal conditions, with no changes to the MHS rule reported through the 2024 revisions.

World Handicap System

Implementation and Global Adoption

The World Handicap System (WHS) was introduced as a collaborative effort between the (USGA) and , with initial development and pilot programs commencing in 2018 to address inconsistencies in global handicapping practices. The system's full rollout began in January 2020 on a phased basis, allowing national golf associations to implement it progressively throughout the year, starting with early adopters like the and expanding worldwide. By May 2025, the WHS had been adopted by 131 national associations and countries, and as of October 2025, adoption reached 132, representing a significant unification of standards previously fragmented across six major systems serving over 15 million golfers in 80 nations. Governance of the WHS is decentralized yet standardized, with each participating or association required to form a Handicap Committee to enforce rules, review scores, and ensure compliance with integrity safeguards. In the United States, the GHIN (Golf Handicap Information Network) serves as the primary platform for score posting and handicap calculation, while globally, accredited software providers enable seamless integration and data management across borders. Adoption encountered challenges, particularly in regions with deeply entrenched legacy systems, such as the , where the shift from the CONGU system was initially met with resistance due to requirements like submitting scores from all rounds and perceived complexities in daily play adjustments. Despite these hurdles, the WHS offers substantial benefits, including a portable Handicap Index that allows golfers to maintain a consistent measure of ability and compete equitably on any course worldwide, regardless of regional variations. As of 2025, the WHS supports millions of active users globally, with over 100 million scores posted annually and notable growth in participation; for instance, U.S. golfers alone submitted more than 77 million scores in 2024, while reported a 29% increase in submissions in the first half of 2025 compared to the prior year. The system has become the standard for major amateur events, including those qualifying for the Olympics, ensuring fair competition by standardizing handicaps for eligibility and net scoring formats.

Key Rules and Features

The World Handicap System (WHS) revises a player's Handicap Index daily to reflect recent performance, utilizing the average of the best eight Score Differentials from the player's most recent 20 acceptable scores. This 20-score lookback ensures the Index remains responsive yet stable, with each new score replacing the oldest in the record. To prevent excessive fluctuations and promote consistency, the system incorporates a soft cap mechanism: once the Handicap Index exceeds the Low Handicap Index (the best eight differentials over the past 365 days) by more than 3.0 strokes, any further upward adjustment is reduced by 50% until the average of the best eight falls within 3.0 strokes of the low. A hard cap further limits increases to no more than 5.0 strokes above the Low Handicap Index, safeguarding against rapid deterioration in recorded ability. A core anti-sandbagging feature is the Playing Conditions Calculation (PCC), which adjusts Score Differentials daily based on how environmental factors like weather, wind, and course setup impact play compared to expected outcomes derived from participants' Handicap Indices. The PCC analyzes aggregated scores from a course on a given day; if conditions make the course play significantly harder or easier, it applies an adjustment ranging from -1.0 to +3.0 strokes to each affected differential, ensuring handicaps accurately represent skill under normal circumstances without exceeding this daily limit. This mechanism, applied automatically where sufficient scores are posted, mitigates the incentive to post inflated scores during adverse conditions. The WHS emphasizes inclusivity through provisions for diverse player groups, including the maintenance of separate Handicap Indices for men and women to accommodate average scoring differences, with a universal maximum Index of 54.0 regardless of . Junior and senior golfers benefit from optional allowances in specific competitions, such as age-based adjustments to Playing Handicaps that can provide additional strokes for equitable participation. For shorter rounds, 9-hole scores are fully integrated without requiring doubling or manual combination: the system calculates an equivalent 18-hole Score Differential by adding an expected score for the unplayed nine holes based on the player's Course Handicap and course ratings, enabling more frequent posting and broader . In competitions, the WHS standardizes equity via Handicap Allowances applied to the Course Handicap to determine the Playing Handicap; for example, individual , Stableford, par/bogey, and maximum score formats use a 95% allowance, reducing strokes proportionally to compress the range between low- and high-handicap players while rewarding superior performance. Other formats, like four-ball , apply an 85% allowance to maintain balance. Complementing these is a formalized global process, where players, committees, and authorized associations must verify scores for accuracy and reasonableness—such as attesting scorecards in formal events or challenging anomalous Indices— to deter manipulation and uphold the system's integrity. This ongoing oversight, integrated into the Rules of Handicapping, applies universally across participating golfing bodies.

Recent Updates (2024-2025)

In 2024, the (USGA) and introduced the first major revisions to the World Handicap System (WHS), effective January 1, to enhance accessibility and equity based on global feedback from over 125 countries. A key change reduced the minimum yardage requirements for issuing a Course Rating and , lowering the threshold from 3,000 yards to 1,500 yards for 18-hole courses and from 1,500 yards to 750 yards for 9-hole courses. This adjustment expanded eligibility to thousands of shorter layouts, such as par-3 and executive courses, particularly benefiting municipal facilities by allowing more golfers to post scores and calculate handicaps without needing full-length venues. The revisions also updated the handling of 9-hole scores, prioritizing of two such rounds from the same course—played within the score —to form a single 18-hole score for Handicap Index calculation when possible. This streamlines posting for players who commonly play shorter rounds and reduces administrative efforts for clubs managing mixed-format scores. Furthermore, hole-play limits for shorter courses were revised to permit scoring on configurations with as few as 10 holes for 18-hole equivalents, providing flexibility for non-traditional layouts while maintaining equitable adjustments. These updates collectively lessen operational burdens on courses, as seen in simplified adjustments for temporary tees during events or maintenance, ensuring consistent handicapping without extensive re-ratings. Building on this, 2025 developments emphasized greater club autonomy in R&A-governed regions to address competition-specific needs. From April 1, 2025, clubs gained the option to customize handicap allowances within defined ranges—such as 85% to 100% for individual (default 95%) and 75% to 90% for four-ball formats (default 85%)—allowing tailored equity based on local player dynamics. Early pilot feedback showed about 60% of participating clubs retaining defaults, but adopters reported improved fairness in events by mitigating potential through adjusted percentages that better balance skill gaps. This flexibility, supported by updated software for automatic calculations, further eases administrative loads while promoting inclusive play at municipal and regional levels. Looking ahead, the USGA and are conducting ongoing reviews of the WHS to boost inclusivity, with a focus on adaptive golf for players with disabilities. Initiatives like the 2025 U.S. Adaptive Open Championship integrate WHS principles with modified rules and equipment, capping Handicap Indexes at 36.4 while ensuring equitable competition across categories such as mobility or visual impairments. These efforts signal continued evolution toward broader participation without compromising the system's core equity.

Legacy and Regional Systems

Pre-WHS USGA System

The pre-World Handicap System (WHS) USGA Handicap System, in place from until its replacement in 2020, provided a standardized method for calculating golfers' handicaps based on submitted scores adjusted for course difficulty. Central to this system was Equitable Stroke Control (ESC), which limited the maximum score recorded on any hole to prevent anomalously high scores from disproportionately inflating a player's handicap. Under ESC, the maximum allowable score per hole depended on the player's Course Handicap: for example, double bogey for handicaps up to 9, triple bogey for 10-19, and net double bogey plus any handicap strokes received on the hole for higher handicaps. This adjustment ensured scores reflected potential ability rather than occasional poor play on individual holes. Handicap Indexes were revised bi-monthly according to a national schedule, typically on the first and fifteenth of each month, using the most recent eligible scores. Key differences from the modern WHS included the absence of daily Handicap Index revisions, reliance on separate calculation formulas and maximum limits for men and women, and the use of the Golf Handicap and Information Network (GHIN) for score posting and management since its development in 1981. Unlike the WHS's daily updates and unified global approach, the pre-WHS system updated Indexes only during designated revision periods, allowing for less frequent adjustments to a player's handicap. GHIN, a computerized service jointly developed by the USGA and regional associations, facilitated centralized score submission and handicap computation across thousands of clubs, streamlining administration that had previously been manual. The system also maintained gender-specific maximums of 36.4 for men and 40.4 for women, reflecting historical differences in average playing abilities. The Handicap Index calculation involved first determining a Handicap Differential for each acceptable score: (Adjusted Gross Score - Course Rating) × 113 / Slope Rating. With at least 20 scores, the Index was the average of the 10 lowest differentials from the most recent 20 scores, rounded to one decimal place, without soft caps to limit extreme movements from exceptional performances. Fewer than 20 scores used a prorated average (e.g., the best three of five for initial Indexes). Course Handicaps were then derived by multiplying the Handicap Index by the Slope Rating of the tees played, divided by 113, and rounded to the nearest whole number. This method emphasized the player's best performances while incorporating course difficulty metrics established in the 1980s. The pre-WHS system was fully phased out in the United States on January 1, 2020, with the adoption of the WHS, though foundational elements such as Course Rating and Slope Rating continue to underpin handicap calculations.

CONGU and EGA Systems

The CONGU Unified Handicap System, established by the Council of National Golf Unions for Great Britain and Ireland, served as the primary handicapping framework in the UK and Ireland before the World Handicap System's rollout. Under this system, the exact handicap index was derived exclusively from scores submitted in qualifying competitions, ensuring adjustments reflected performance in official events rather than casual rounds. Handicap reductions were applied based on scores better than the Competition Standard Scratch (CSS), with the buffer zone mechanism—typically ranging from the index plus 2 to plus 4 strokes depending on the player's category—determining the threshold for more significant cuts to prevent overly rapid drops. Maximum exact handicaps were capped at 28 for men and 36 for women, though playing handicaps in competitions could exceed these limits through allowances. The European Golf Association (EGA) Handicap System, applied across , closely mirrored the CONGU model but incorporated adjustments tailored to diverse national conditions and course variations. Like CONGU, the EGA emphasized exact handicaps calculated from competition scores, with annual reviews by national authorities to verify accuracy and fairness. It distinguished between exact handicaps, used for official indexing, and playing handicaps, which adjusted for specific formats, while maintaining a focus on equitable play through similar maximum limits of 28 for men and 36 for women. Continental adaptations included provisions for general play scores in select member federations, though competition scores remained predominant for index adjustments. Both systems shared key elements, including a unified allocation that assigned stroke allowances to holes based on relative difficulty, facilitating fair and scoring. Handicap committees, comprising peers and officials, conducted ongoing reviews to address anomalies, such as exceptional scoring runs or consistent overperformance, ensuring integrity without routine general play submissions. Pre-WHS, neither system mandated posting non-competition scores, prioritizing verified event data. By 2020-2021, CONGU nations fully integrated into the WHS, while EGA members completed adoption between 2021 and 2024, preserving traditions like competition-specific allowances in certain formats.

Other National Variations

In , the pre-2020 Golf (GA) handicap system calculated the handicap index by averaging the best 8 differentials from a golfer's most recent 20 acceptable scores. This method closely mirrored the core calculation introduced with the World Handicap System (WHS), resulting in minimal adjustments to existing handicaps upon full adoption in January 2020. Under the WHS, GA administers handicaps through its GOLF Link platform, maintaining a maximum index of 54.0 for both men and women, while incorporating local provisions for aggregate scoring in team competitions to ensure equity across diverse Australian courses. South Africa's pre-WHS handicapping, administered by the South African Golf Union (SAGU, now part of GolfRSA), emphasized competition eligibility with a maximum handicap of 36 for both men and women, calculated from adjusted scores to promote equitable play in tournaments. The country adopted the WHS in 2020, with key regulatory updates effective from March 2021 to align course handicap allowances and playing handicaps with global standards. Some legacy elements persist, including junior-specific rules where male players under 13 are handicapped from ladies' tees to account for physical development and course accessibility. In , the Asociación Argentina de Golf (AAG) adopted the WHS in January 2020. Prior to adoption, the AAG employed a straightforward approach, calculating handicaps based on submitted scores, with System 36 used for same-day handicap estimation in non-official rounds by assigning points to scores relative to par (e.g., 0 for par, 1 for bogey). These national variations share common features such as regionally set maximum handicaps to reflect local player demographics and terrain challenges, which informed WHS adaptations for broader geographical inclusivity without fully supplanting pre-existing competition adjustments.

Alternative Handicapping Methods

Peoria System

The Peoria System is a longstanding ad-hoc method developed in the early 20th century, possibly in , from which it derives its name. It was designed for casual events, such as charity outings or corporate tournaments, where participants may lack established handicap indexes. The system generates a one-round handicap allowance based solely on scores from the ongoing round, eliminating the need for historical performance data. To implement the Peoria System, organizers secretly select six holes before the round begins—typically two par-3s, two par-4s, and two par-5s—to ensure a balanced representation of hole difficulties. After play concludes, the selected holes are revealed, and each player's scores on those six holes are totaled. This sum is multiplied by 3 to extrapolate an estimated 18-hole score, from which the course's total par (usually 72) is subtracted; the result is then multiplied by 80% (or 0.8) to determine the handicap allowance. The player's gross score minus this allowance yields the net score for competition purposes. For example, if a player's scores on the six selected holes total 28 and the course par is 72, the calculation is (28 × 3) - 72 = 12, then 12 × 0.8 = 9.6 strokes, rounded to 10 for the handicap allowance. This approach offers several advantages for informal play: it requires no pre-existing records, allowing immediate inclusion of all participants, and the undisclosed hole selection discourages sandbagging by preventing players from strategically underperforming on anticipated handicap holes. It also facilitates quick scoring in large-field events, promoting equitable net competitions without administrative complexity. However, the Peoria System has notable limitations as it is not recognized by governing bodies like the USGA for official handicaps, relying instead on a small sample of holes that may not accurately reflect a player's full-round , leading to higher variance in results compared to established systems. Unlike comprehensive handicap frameworks that aggregate multiple rounds, it provides only a snapshot estimate, potentially disadvantaging consistent performers on unselected holes.

Callaway and Scheid Systems

The Callaway System, developed in the 1940s by Lionel F. Callaway, serves as a one-round handicapping method for golfers without established indexes, enabling fair competition in casual events by estimating a handicap directly from the gross score of a single 18-hole round. The calculation begins by adjusting any hole scores exceeding double par down to double par to mitigate the impact of exceptionally poor holes. The handicap allowance is then derived using the Callaway table based on the adjusted gross score: the table specifies the number of worst holes to eliminate (from 0 for scores around 80 to 8 or more for scores over 120) and an adjustment value (typically ±1 to ±5 strokes). The scores of the identified worst holes are subtracted from the adjusted gross score, and the adjustment is applied to yield the net score, with the effective allowance capped around 24-36 strokes in practice depending on the table implementation. The Scheid System, introduced in 1977 by mathematician Dr. Francis Scheid, builds on the Callaway approach but refines it for greater equity among higher-scoring players, particularly in tournaments where scores fall in the low hundreds. Like Callaway, it starts with an adjusted gross score by capping hole scores at double par, then uses a table tied to score bands to eliminate a weighted value of the worst holes (e.g., full value for the worst, three-quarters for the second, half for the third, or more holes for high scores), with an additional adjustment, aiming to reduce the impact of blow-up holes while limiting overall generosity, with a maximum handicap of 50 strokes. Both systems are widely used in society outings, corporate events, and informal scrambles, as they require no handicap posting or , allowing instant score computation for prizes. For instance, a golfer posting a gross score of 110 under the Callaway System typically receives an 18- to 20-stroke allowance after adjustments, yielding a score around 90-92 against a par of 72. Compared to the Peoria System, Callaway and Scheid apply modifications across the full round rather than sampling specific holes, resulting in less favorable adjustments for very high gross scores and closer approximations to official handicaps for mid-range players.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.