Hubbry Logo
Dutch rollDutch rollMain
Open search
Dutch roll
Community hub
Dutch roll
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Dutch roll
Dutch roll
Dutch roll
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
An animated illustration of the two motions which combine into a Dutch roll
Dutch roll damping technique, scanned from U.S. Air Force flight manual

Dutch roll is an aircraft motion consisting of an out-of-phase combination of "tail-wagging" (yaw) and rocking from side to side (roll). This yaw-roll coupling is one of the basic flight dynamic modes (others include phugoid, short period, and spiral divergence). This mode resembles the motion of an aircraft that is simultaneously yawing and rolling from side to side.[1] This motion is normally well damped in most light aircraft, though some aircraft with well-damped Dutch roll modes can experience a degradation in damping as airspeed decreases and altitude increases. Dutch roll stability can be artificially increased by the installation of a yaw damper.[2] Wings placed well above the center of gravity, swept wings, and dihedral wings tend to increase the roll restoring force, and therefore increase the Dutch roll tendencies; this is why high-winged aircraft often are slightly anhedral, and transport-category swept-wing aircraft are equipped with yaw dampers. A similar phenomenon can happen in a trailer pulled by a car.

Stability

[edit]

In aircraft design, Dutch roll results from relatively weaker positive directional stability as opposed to positive lateral stability. When an aircraft rolls around the longitudinal axis, a sideslip is introduced into the relative wind in the direction of the rolling motion (due to the lateral component of lift when the wings are not level). Strong lateral stability (due to the more-direct airflow past the down wing, which has been pivoted forward by the slip) begins to restore the aircraft to level flight. At the same time, somewhat weaker directional stability (due both to greater drag from the wing which is now generating greater lift, and by aerodynamic force on the vertical fin due to the yaw) attempts to correct the sideslip by aligning the aircraft with the perceived relative wind. Since directional stability is weaker than lateral stability for the particular aircraft, the restoring yaw motion lags significantly behind the restoring roll motion. The aircraft passes through level flight as the yawing motion is continuing in the direction of the original roll. At that point, the sideslip is introduced in the opposite direction and the process is reversed.

There is a trade-off between directional and lateral stability. Greater lateral stability leads to greater spiral stability and lower oscillatory stability. Greater directional stability leads to spiral instability but greater oscillatory stability.[3]

Mechanism

[edit]

The most common mechanism of Dutch roll occurrence is a yawing motion which can be caused by a number of factors. As a swept-wing aircraft yaws (to the right, for instance), the left wing becomes less-swept than the right wing in reference to the relative wind. Because of this, the left wing develops more lift than the right wing causing the aircraft to roll to the right. This motion continues until the yaw angle of the aircraft reaches the point where the vertical stabilizer effectively becomes a wind vane and reverses the yawing motion. As the aircraft yaws back to the left, the right wing then becomes less swept than the left resulting in the right wing developing more lift than the left. The aircraft then rolls to the left as the yaw angle again reaches the point where the aircraft wind-vanes back the other direction and the whole process repeats itself. The average duration of a Dutch roll half-cycle is 2 to 3 seconds.

The Dutch roll mode can be excited by any use of aileron or rudder, but for flight test purposes it is usually excited with a rudder singlet (a short sharp motion of the rudder to a specified angle, and then back to the centered position) or doublet (a pair of such motions in opposite directions). Some larger aircraft are better excited with aileron inputs. Periods can range from a few seconds for light aircraft to a minute or more for airliners.[citation needed]

Tex Johnston describes the Dutch roll as "...an inherent characteristic of swept-wing aircraft. It starts with a yaw. In a 35-degree swept-wing airplane, a yaw is accompanied by a simultaneous roll in the direction of yaw. The roll is caused by changing lift factors as the airflow path over the wing changes. For example, in a left yaw the left wing slews toward the rear so that airflow is displaced spanwise from its normal front-to-rear path over the airfoil section. That reduces lift. Simultaneously, the advancing right wing gets more chordwise flow, and so its lift is increased. In combination the two conditions create a left roll. Similarly, a yaw to the right results in a roll to the right. An oscillation is set up."[4]

Rolling on a heading

[edit]

Dutch roll is also the name (considered by professionals to be a misnomer) given to a coordination maneuver generally taught to student pilots to improve their "stick-and-rudder" technique. The aircraft is alternately rolled as much as 60 degrees left and right while rudder is applied to keep the nose of the aircraft pointed at a fixed point. More correctly, this is a rudder coordination practice exercise, to teach a student pilot how to correct for the effect known as adverse aileron yaw during roll inputs.

This coordination technique is better referred to as "rolling on a heading", wherein the aircraft is rolled in such a way as to maintain an accurate heading without the nose moving from side-to-side (or yawing). The yaw motion is induced through the use of ailerons alone due to aileron drag, wherein the lifting wing (aileron down) is doing more work than the descending wing (aileron up) and therefore creates more drag, forcing the lifting wing back, yawing the aircraft toward it. This yawing effect produced by rolling motion is known as adverse yaw. This has to be countered precisely by application of rudder in the same direction as the aileron control (left stick, left rudder – right stick, right rudder). This is known as synchronised controls when done properly, and is difficult to learn and apply well. The correct amount of rudder to apply with aileron is different for each aircraft.

Name

[edit]

The origin of the name Dutch roll is uncertain. However, it is likely that this term, describing a lateral asymmetric motion of an airplane, was borrowed from a reference to similar-appearing motion in ice skating. In 1916, aeronautical engineer Jerome C. Hunsaker published: "Dutch roll – the third element in the [lateral] motion [of an airplane] is a yawing to the right and left, combined with rolling. The motion is oscillatory of period for 7 to 12 seconds, which may or may not be damped. The analogy to 'Dutch Roll' or 'Outer Edge' in ice skating is obvious."[5] In 1916, Dutch Roll was the term used for skating repetitively to right and left (by analogy to the motion described for the aircraft) on the outer edge of one's skates. By 1916, the term had been imported from skating to aeronautical engineering, perhaps by Hunsaker himself. 1916 was only five years after G. H. Bryan did the first mathematical analysis of lateral motion of aircraft in 1911.[6]

Notable incidents

[edit]
  • On October 19, 1959, on a Boeing 707 on customer-acceptance flight, the yaw damper was turned off to familiarize the new pilots with flying techniques. A trainee pilot's actions violently exacerbated the Dutch roll motion and caused three of the aircraft's four engines to be torn from its wings. The plane, a brand new 707-227, N7071, destined for Braniff, crash-landed on a river bed north of Seattle at Arlington, Washington, killing four of the eight occupants.[7][8]
  • On August 12, 1985, Japan Air Lines Flight 123, a Boeing 747SR, exhibited a Dutch roll in combination with phugoid cycles after losing all hydraulics following the loss of its vertical stabiliser due to an improperly-repaired rear pressure bulkhead rupturing from metal fatigue. It would ultimately crash in the deadliest single-aircraft accident in history.
  • On March 6, 2005, Air Transat Flight 961, an Airbus A310, was involved in a Dutch roll incident following structural failure of the rudder at cruising altitude after departure from Juan Gualberto Gomez Airport, Varadero, Cuba. The aircraft returned to the airport with serious structural damage and one flight attendant slightly injured.[9]
  • On May 3, 2013, a McConnell AFB, KS (USAF) KC-135R, 63-8877, flown by a Fairchild AFB, Washington aircrew, broke up in flight about eleven minutes after taking off from Manas Air base in Kyrgyzstan, killing all three crew members.[10][11] It was determined that a rudder power control unit malfunction led to a Dutch roll oscillatory instability. Not recognizing the Dutch roll, the crew used the rudder to stay on course, which exacerbated the instability, leading to an unrecoverable flight condition. The over-stressed tail section detached and the rest of the aircraft broke apart soon after. The aircraft was at cruise altitude about 200 km west of Bishkek before it crashed in a mountainous area near the village of Chorgolu, close to the border between Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan.[12][13][14][15]
  • On October 30, 2015 a Leonardo-Finmeccanica-Helicopters Division (formerly AgustaWestland) AW609 prototype crashed in Italy killing its two pilots. The Italian ANSV established that Dutch roll during a high-speed test was the probable cause.[16][17]
  • On May 25, 2024, Southwest Flight 746, a Boeing 737 MAX 8, registration N8825Q, experienced a Dutch roll during a flight from Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport to Oakland International Airport. Post-flight inspection revealed damage to the standby power control unit (PCU). There were no injuries among the 175 passengers and six crew members.[18][19][20][21]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Dutch roll

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Dutch roll is an oscillatory motion in involving coupled rolling and yawing, where the wings alternately bank left and right while the nose yaws side to side, typically triggered when the dihedral effects providing lateral stability overpower the from the vertical tail. This dynamic lateral-directional mode is usually stable and self-damps over a few cycles in well-designed , but it can feel objectionable to pilots due to its wavelike, figure-eight path traced by the nose on the horizon, especially in swept-wing designs at high speeds or altitudes. The term "Dutch roll" originated in the early 20th century, likely borrowed from the side-to-side rolling motion of Dutch ice skaters, evoking the aircraft's rhythmic . It became a focal point in aeronautical engineering during the and as high-speed revealed coupled stability challenges, formalized in analyses like the Dutch roll stability equation Cn∗=Cnβcos⁡α−IzIxClβC_n^* = C_{n\beta} \cos\alpha - \frac{I_z}{I_x} C_{l\beta}, which accounts for yaw and roll moments influenced by sideslip angle and moments of inertia. Causes include excessive effective dihedral from sweep or design, reduced damping at speeds, and imbalances in control surface authority, leading to potential pilot-induced oscillations if undamped. Mitigation strategies prioritize enhancing directional stability through larger vertical stabilizers or ventral/dorsal fins, while modern aircraft employ yaw dampers—gyroscopic systems that automatically apply rudder inputs to suppress the mode without pilot intervention. Designers often favor slight spiral instability over strong Dutch roll tendencies for safer handling, as seen in general aviation and commercial jets where the mode's frequency and damping are tuned for Level 1 flying qualities per military standards. In extreme cases, like the X-15 rocket plane, adverse dihedral caused severe Dutch roll, resolved by modifying ventral fins to restore balance. Overall, understanding and controlling Dutch roll remains essential for ensuring lateral-directional stability across subsonic to hypersonic flight regimes.

Overview

Definition

Dutch roll is a coupled lateral-directional oscillatory motion in aircraft, consisting of an out-of-phase combination of yaw (rotation about the vertical axis, causing the nose to swing left or right) and roll (rotation about the longitudinal axis, tilting the wings such that one dips relative to the other). This dynamic mode typically features light damping, resulting in sustained oscillations that can affect handling if not adequately controlled. In stability analysis, Dutch roll represents one of the primary lateral-directional modes, distinct from the longitudinal (a slow, involving speed and altitude variations) and short-period (a rapid pitching ) modes. It emerges from the inherent coupling between yaw and roll responses to disturbances, such as gusts, and is influenced by factors like the 's and inertial properties. The mode's characteristics underscore its importance in ensuring safe flight dynamics, with implications for pilot workload and overall stability that are addressed through design features like yaw dampers.

Characteristics

Dutch roll manifests as a coupled oscillation involving yaw and roll motions, where the aircraft alternately yaws and banks in opposing directions. The typical period of this oscillation ranges from 2 to 4 seconds per cycle, depending on the aircraft type, speed, and altitude; for instance, general aviation airplanes often exhibit periods between 2.1 and 4.8 seconds, corresponding to frequencies of 1.3 to 3.0 radians per second. The of Dutch roll oscillations generally decreases over time due to natural in well-designed , where the typically exceeds 0.1, allowing the motion to subside within a few cycles. However, if is insufficient (e.g., ratio below 0.1), the may persist or grow, leading to larger excursions in roll and yaw that can degrade handling qualities. At higher speeds, the dihedral effect enhances roll stability, which increases the and can amplify the mode's prominence if is marginal. Excitation of Dutch roll commonly arises from external disturbances such as gusts or , which induce initial sideslip, or from pilot inputs like or deflections that couple into yaw-roll motion. Lateral gusts, in particular, generate yaw disturbances proportional to the aircraft's derivative, exciting the mode near its . Pilots experience Dutch roll through sensory cues including alternating sideslip and bank angles, resulting in a rhythmic side-to-side rocking sensation and visual horizon motion resembling a figure-eight . These cues can include noticeable wingtip oscillations and heading deviations of 10 degrees or more, often accompanied by increased control workload to maintain stability.

Etymology and History

Origin of the Name

The term "Dutch roll" originates from a traditional maneuver, particularly associated with Dutch long-distance skating styles, where skaters perform a rhythmic side-to-side swaying motion on the outer edges of their blades while maintaining forward speed. This technique, known as schoonrijden or "clean riding," allows efficient travel over frozen canals and emphasizes a rolling to conserve energy during extended tours. In 1916, aeronautical engineer Jerome C. Hunsaker, an early pioneer in aircraft design and stability analysis, coined the term for to analogize the coupled oscillations in yaw and roll exhibited by airplanes. Hunsaker explicitly drew the comparison in his seminal paper, describing the motion as akin to the skating figure: "The second type of motion has been called a 'Dutch roll' from analogy to a figure in . The aeroplane takes up an oscillation in yaw and roll simultaneously." As a naval constructor and instructor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Hunsaker's work marked one of the first formal recognitions of such dynamic instabilities in powered flight. The prefix "Dutch" in this context likely stems from the maneuver's roots in Dutch skating traditions, rather than any colloquial implication of unsteadiness, though the evocative imagery of swaying motion bridged the two domains effectively. This etymological transfer highlighted the intuitive parallels between human athleticism and emerging aeronautical phenomena during the nascent era of development.

Early Development

The coupled lateral-directional oscillation now known as Dutch roll was first mathematically described in 1911 by British aerodynamicist George Hartley Bryan in his seminal work Stability in Aviation, where he analyzed the dynamic stability of early aeroplanes and identified oscillatory modes involving roll and yaw. Bryan's equations laid the foundational framework for understanding these interactions, though the term "Dutch roll" emerged later during , around 1916, as pilots observed the motion in nascent such as the and early biplanes, where slight disturbances led to persistent side-to-side rocking combined with yawing. These initial observations were qualitative, drawn from flight reports, and highlighted the mode's presence even in straight-wing designs, predating widespread swept-wing experimentation. In the 1920s and 1930s, the (NACA) conducted systematic wind-tunnel and flight tests to investigate lateral stability, revealing yaw-roll coupling as a critical factor in high-speed flight regimes. NACA Report No. 26 (1920) by Edwin Bidwell Wilson quantified yawing moments induced by rolling, demonstrating how dihedral effects amplified the oscillation in tailed aircraft. Subsequent studies in the 1930s further delineated the coupling mechanisms through free-flight models, emphasizing the need for balanced directional and roll damping to prevent divergent modes. Pioneering aerodynamicists like Edward P. Warner, who served as a key consultant and authored influential texts including Airplane Design: Aerodynamics (1927), contributed to these efforts by advocating for integrated stability criteria in aircraft configuration, influencing NACA's emphasis on empirical data over pure theory. Following , the advent of intensified focus on Dutch roll due to rearward mass shifts from engine placements, exacerbating the mode in high-subsonic designs like the . (later ) research in the late 1940s identified these trends, leading to standardized protocols by the 1950s that incorporated evaluations and spectral analysis of oscillations during trials. This era marked a shift toward proactive , with figures like Jerome C. Hunsaker—credited with popularizing the "Dutch roll" —overseeing broader stability advancements at MIT and NACA.

Flight Dynamics

Mechanism

The Dutch roll in arises from a coupled oscillatory motion involving yaw and roll, initiated by an aerodynamic disturbance that creates a sideslip . This sideslip occurs when the yaws slightly off its flight path, causing the relative wind to strike the and wings at an . The dihedral effect of the wings—either geometric dihedral or the effective dihedral induced by wing sweep—then generates a rolling moment, as the lower wing experiences increased lift due to the angled airflow, prompting the to roll toward the sideslip direction. This roll, in turn, induces a secondary yaw through the 's , as the rolling motion shifts the relative wind and creates a yawing moment in the opposite direction via the vertical tail or . The process forms a feedback loop: the initial yaw disturbance leads to sideslip, which drives roll via the dihedral effect; the ensuing roll then generates counter-yawing forces, perpetuating the as the alternately yaws and rolls out of phase. In this loop, the sideslip-to-roll coupling (via dihedral) and roll-to-yaw coupling (via ) reinforce each other, resulting in a rhythmic, undamped or lightly damped motion resembling a figure-eight path on the horizon. Swept wings exacerbate this because the sweep angle directs with a forward component during sideslip, effectively increasing the dihedral-like stability and amplifying the differential lift between wings. This makes Dutch roll more pronounced in swept-wing designs compared to straight-wing , where the coupling is weaker due to more uniform distribution. The phenomenon is particularly evident at higher cruise speeds, where intensifies the aerodynamic forces, though it is less severe in low-speed, straight-wing configurations.

Mathematical Modeling

The lateral-directional equations of motion for an aircraft provide the quantitative foundation for modeling Dutch roll, a coupled oscillatory mode involving sideslip, roll, and yaw. These equations are derived from Newton's laws applied to the aircraft's body axes under small perturbation assumptions, linearizing the nonlinear flight dynamics around a steady trimmed condition. The relevant state variables typically include the sideslip angle β (in radians), roll angle φ (in radians), roll rate p (in rad/s), and yaw rate r (in rad/s), with the yaw angle ψ integrated from r for trajectory analysis. In state-space form, the dynamics are expressed as x˙=Ax+Bu\dot{x} = A x + B u, where x=[β,ϕ,p,r]Tx = [\beta, \phi, p, r]^T is the state vector, uu includes control inputs such as aileron deflection δa\delta_a and rudder deflection δr\delta_r, and the system matrix AA incorporates dimensional stability derivatives like YβY_\beta (side force due to sideslip), LβL_\beta (rolling moment due to sideslip, also denoted LvL_v), LpL_p (rolling moment due to roll rate), LrL_r (rolling moment due to yaw rate), NβN_\beta (yawing moment due to sideslip), NpN_p (yawing moment due to roll rate), and NrN_r (yawing moment due to yaw rate). The kinematic relations are ϕ˙=p+rtan⁡θ0\dot{\phi} = p + r \tan \theta_0 (approximated as ϕ˙≈p\dot{\phi} \approx p for small pitch angle θ0\theta_0) and ψ˙=r/cos⁡θ0\dot{\psi} = r / \cos \theta_0, while the force and moment equations yield: β˙=Yβu0β+Ypu0p+Yr−u0u0r+gu0ϕcos⁡θ0+1u0(Yδaδa+Yδrδr),\dot{\beta} = \frac{Y_\beta}{u_0} \beta + \frac{Y_p}{u_0} p + \frac{Y_r - u_0}{u_0} r + \frac{g}{u_0} \phi \cos \theta_0 + \frac{1}{u_0} (Y_{\delta_a} \delta_a + Y_{\delta_r} \delta_r), p˙=Lββ+Lpp+Lrr+Lδaδa+Lδrδr,\dot{p} = L_\beta \beta + L_p p + L_r r + L_{\delta_a} \delta_a + L_{\delta_r} \delta_r, r˙=Nββ+Npp+Nrr+Nδaδa+Nδrδr,\dot{r} = N_\beta \beta + N_p p + N_r r + N_{\delta_a} \delta_a + N_{\delta_r} \delta_r, where u0u_0 is the trimmed forward speed and gg is gravitational acceleration. The full fourth-order characteristic equation arises from det⁡(λI−A)=0\det(\lambda I - A) = 0, yielding roots corresponding to the spiral, roll subsidence, and Dutch roll modes. For the Dutch roll mode, a second-order approximation is often used by neglecting the aperiodic roll subsidence (assuming LpL_p dominates and decouples quickly) and focusing on the coupled β-r dynamics, resulting in the characteristic equation λ2−(Nr+Yβ/u0)λ+[Nβ(1−Yr/u0)+NrYβ/u0]=0.\lambda^2 - (N_r + Y_\beta / u_0) \lambda + [N_\beta (1 - Y_r / u_0) + N_r Y_\beta / u_0] = 0. This is recast in standard form as λ2+2ζωλ+ω2=0\lambda^2 + 2 \zeta \omega \lambda + \omega^2 = 0, where the natural frequency is ω=Nβ(1−Yr/u0)+NrYβ/u0\omega = \sqrt{N_\beta (1 - Y_r / u_0) + N_r Y_\beta / u_0}
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.