Hubbry Logo
Ego idealEgo idealMain
Open search
Ego ideal
Community hub
Ego ideal
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Ego ideal
Ego ideal
Ego ideal
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Freud. Ego ideal—Ego—Object—Outer Object

In Freudian psychoanalysis, the ego ideal (German: Ichideal)[1] is the inner image of oneself as one wants to become.[2] It consists of "the individual's conscious and unconscious images of what he would like to be, patterned after certain people whom ... he regards as ideal."[3]

In French psychoanalysis, the concept of the ego ideal is distinguished from that of the ideal ego (German: Idealich).[1] According to Jacques Lacan, it is the ideal ego, generated at the time of the infant's identification with its own unified specular image, that becomes the foundation for the ego's constant striving for perfection. In contrast, the ego ideal is when the ego views itself from that imaginary point of perfection, seeing its normal life as vain and futile.[4]

Freud and superego

[edit]

Freud's essay On Narcissism: An Introduction [1914] introduces "the concepts of the 'ego ideal' and of the self-observing agency related to it, which were the basis of what was ultimately to be described as the 'super-ego' in The Ego and the Id (1923b)."[5] Freud considered that the ego ideal was the heir to the narcissism of childhood: "This ideal ego is now the target of the self-love which was enjoyed in childhood by the actual ego. ... What he [man] projects before him as his ideal is the substitute for the lost narcissism of his childhood in which he was his own ideal."[6]

In the decade that followed, the concept played an increasingly important part in Freud's thinking. In "Mourning and Melancholia" [1917], he stressed how "one part of the ego sets itself over against the other, judges it critically, and, as it were, takes it as its object."[7] A few years later, in Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego (1921), he examined further how "some such agency develops in our ego which may cut itself off from the rest of the ego and come into conflict with it. We have called it the 'ego ideal'... heir to the original narcissism in which the childish ego enjoyed self-sufficiency."[8] Freud reiterated how "in many forms of love-choice ... the object serves as a substitute for some unattained ego ideal of our own," and further suggested that in group formation "the group ideal ... governs the ego in the place of the ego ideal."[9]

With The Ego and the Id [1923], however, Freud's nomenclature began to change. He still emphasised the importance of "the existence of a grade in the ego, a differentiation in the ego, which may be called the 'ego ideal' or 'super-ego',"[10] but it was the latter term which now came to the forefront. After The Ego and the Id and some shorter works following it, the term 'ego ideal' disappears almost completely from Freud's writing.[11] When it briefly reappears in the "New Introductory Lectures" [1933], it is as part of the super-ego, which is "the vehicle of the ego ideal by which the ego measures itself ... precipitate of the old picture of the parents, the expression of admiration for the perfection which the child then attributed to them."[12]

Later perspectives

[edit]

Otto Fenichel, building on Sandor Rado's differentiation of "the 'good' (i.e., protecting) and the 'bad' (i.e., punishing) aspects of the superego"[13] sought to "distinguish ego ideals, the patterns of what one would like to be, from the superego, which is characterized as a threatening, prohibiting, and punishing power".[14] While acknowledging the links between the two agencies, he suggested for example that "in humor the overcathected superego is the friendly and protective ego-ideal; in depression, it is the negative, hostile, punishing conscience."[15]

Kleinians like Herbert Rosenfeld "re-invoked Freud's earlier emphasis on the importance of the ego ideal in narcissism, and conceived of a characteristic internal object—a chimerical montage or monster, one might say—that was constructed of the ego, the ego ideal, and the 'mad omnipotent self'."[16] In their wake, Otto Kernberg highlighted the destructive qualities of the "infantile, grandiose ego ideal" - of "identification with an overidealized self- and object-representation, with the primitive form of ego-ideal."[17]

In a literary context, Harold Bloom argued that "in the narcissist, the ego-ideal becomes inflated and destructive, because it is filled with images of perfection and omnipotence."[18] Escape from the consequences of such obsessive devotion to the ego-ideal is only possible when it is given up and one instead affirms "the innocence of humility."[19]

In French psychoanalysis, the concept of the ideal ego is distinguished from the ego ideal. In the 1930s Hermann Nunberg, following Freud, developed a concept of the ideal ego, genetically prior to the superego.[20] Daniel Lagache developed the distinction, asserting that "the adolescent identifies him- or herself anew with the ideal ego and strives by this means to separate from the superego and the ego ideal."[21] Jacques Lacan understood the concept of the ideal ego in terms of the subject's "narcissistic identification ... his ideal ego, that point at which he desires to gratify himself in himself."[22] For Lacan, "the subject has to regulate the completion of what comes as ... ideal ego — which is not the ego ideal — that is to say, to constitute himself in his imaginary reality."[23]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Ego ideal

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In Freudian psychoanalysis, the ego ideal is the internalized mental representation of an individual's perfect or aspirational self, functioning as a standard by which the actual ego evaluates and strives to improve itself. This concept embodies goals, values, and moral standards derived from early identifications with parental figures and societal norms, serving as a repository of positive aspirations that guide behavior and self-esteem. Sigmund Freud first introduced the ego ideal in his 1914 essay "On Narcissism: An Introduction", describing it as a displacement of primary from childhood—where the perceives itself as perfect—onto an external ideal imposed by parents and environment. He explained that this formation occurs through the critical influence of others, leading the ego to withdraw from direct object attachments and redirect it toward this self-imposed ideal, thereby recovering a sense of narcissistic completeness. At this stage, the ego ideal is linked to as a monitoring "watchman" that enforces ethical demands, repressing impulses that conflict with these standards. By 1923, in "", Freud revised and expanded the idea, equating the ego ideal with the superego, the psyche's moral component that emerges from the resolution of the through identification with the father. Here, the ego ideal originates as a precipitate of abandoned object-cathexes, particularly the first major identification in , and acts as a critical agency that observes, judges, and punishes the ego for failing to meet its ideals, thereby generating feelings of guilt and . This integration positions the ego ideal as a key regulator of personality, balancing instinctual drives of the with reality demands on the ego, while influencing character formation and when overly harsh or unattainable.

Definition and Core Concepts

Definition

The ego ideal is a foundational concept in , referring to the conscious and unconscious inner representation of an aspirational that an strives to embody, often modeled after admired figures such as parents or other significant authority models. This ideal serves as an internalized standard against which one's actual behavior, achievements, and moral conduct are evaluated, influencing motivation, , and . Originating from the resolution of childhood , it represents a redirected form of where the no longer views themselves as the sole object of perfection but projects an elevated version forward as a goal. Sigmund Freud introduced the ego ideal in 1914, describing it as "the substitute for the lost narcissism of his childhood in which he was his own ideal," which forms the basis for self-observation, , and the pursuit of higher standards. In this framework, the ego ideal functions as a motivational force, guiding the ego to align actions with these internalized aspirations while fostering a sense of worth through proximity to the ideal. It emerges developmentally through the process of identification with early caregivers, particularly during the resolution of the , where personal ambitions become intertwined with adopted parental or societal norms. This construct acts as a precursor to the superego, providing an aspirational dimension that later integrates into broader moral regulation. By embodying both conscious ideals and unconscious drives, the ego ideal thus bridges with cultural expectations, shaping lifelong patterns of self-regulation.

Distinction from Ideal Ego

In Freud's original formulation, the terms "ideal ego" and "ego ideal" are often used synonymously to describe the standard by which the ego measures itself, emerging as a substitute for the lost of childhood where the ego was its own ideal. Later , particularly in Lacanian interpretations, introduces a clearer distinction: the ideal ego represents a regressive, imaginary of wholeness rooted in early , while the ego ideal is an aspirational, construct oriented toward future identification with external models and societal demands. Functionally, the ideal ego can underpin defensive and narcissistic fantasies, whereas the ego ideal promotes moral growth and adaptation by directing aspirations toward ethical standards.

Historical Development

Freud's Introduction

Sigmund Freud first introduced the concept of the ego ideal in his 1914 essay "On Narcissism: An Introduction," marking a significant development in his understanding of narcissistic libido and psychic structure. The essay, originally presented in lectures to the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society in 1913 and published in German as "Zur Einführung des Narzißmus" in the Jahrbuch der Psychoanalyse, volume 6, pages 1–24, situates the ego ideal within the broader context of narcissism's evolution from infantile autoeroticism to mature object relations. Freud described narcissism as the libidinal investment of the ego, initially primary and autoerotic in infancy, where the child's satisfaction derives from its own body without external objects. As development progresses, this primary narcissism undergoes modification through cultural and ethical demands, leading to the redirection of libido from the self toward external ideals. The ego ideal emerges as the heir to this primary , enabling continued self-love by establishing an internalized standard against which the actual ego is measured. Freud explained that "what consists in the one man of an aim and a satisfaction in a narcissistic object-choice is in the other man constituted by his own ego ideal, which he has set up for himself by the study of his cultural ideals." This formation occurs through the of parental authority, where the child's perception of parental criticism prompts the creation of an internal agency that observes and judges the ego, much like a . Thus, the ego ideal functions as a "special psychical agency" that ensures narcissistic satisfaction by aligning the ego with these elevated ideals, redirecting libido that might otherwise remain bound to autoerotic sources or be withdrawn into pathological . In linking the ego ideal to object choice, Freud distinguished narcissistic types, who select objects resembling their own ego ideal, from anaclitic types, who choose based on attachment to caregivers. This mechanism allows the individual to recover the lost perfection of childhood narcissism vicariously through identification with external or internalized ideals, fostering while subjecting the ego to ongoing self-observation and moral regulation. Freud later evolved this concept into the superego in works such as (1923), integrating it more fully into his structural model of the psyche.

Evolution in Freud's Later Work

In his 1923 work , significantly refined the concept of the ego ideal by integrating it fully into the superego within his structural model of the psyche. Building on its initial introduction in as a narcissistic extension of the ego, the ego ideal now emerged as the idealistic, aspirational component of the superego, distinct from its punitive aspect. This subsumption marked a maturation of the concept, positioning the ego ideal as a benchmark for self-evaluation rather than merely a substitute for primary . Freud described the superego as "the heir to the ," with the ego ideal embodying the aspirational identifications formed during Oedipal resolution. This developmental progression transformed the ego ideal from a narcissistic substitute—rooted in early —into a shaped by parental authority and cultural norms, guiding the ego toward higher standards of behavior and achievement. The ego ideal thus facilitates ongoing self-observation, where the ego measures itself against these internalized ideals, fostering ambition while also contributing to when shortcomings arise. Freud reinforced this framework in his 1933 New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis, particularly in Lecture XXXI, emphasizing the ego ideal's enduring role as a standard within the superego for the ego's self-assessment. He elaborated that the superego, incorporating the ego ideal, sets up an internal model derived from Oedipal object-choices, against which the ego continuously evaluates its actions and moral worth. This integration highlighted the ego ideal's function in promoting ethical development, influenced by societal expectations, while maintaining its distinction as the superego's positive, idealizing dimension.

Relation to Superego

Integration into Superego Structure

In Freud's structural model of the psyche, the ego ideal serves as the idealistic nucleus within the superego, representing aspirational standards that guide self-improvement and contrast with the superego's broader critical oversight of moral conduct. This integration positions the ego ideal as a differentiated agency that confronts the ego with an internalized benchmark, fostering adaptation by aligning personal actions with higher ethical goals rather than merely enforcing prohibitions. The formation of the ego ideal occurs through the internalization of parental ideals, particularly during the latency period, when identifications with authority figures—often the —create a permanent modification of the ego that serves as a standard for reality-testing and behavioral regulation. This process transforms early object relations into a structural component of the superego, precipitating the resolution of oedipal conflicts and establishing a moral compass that evaluates the ego's performance against these absorbed ideals. Libidinal investment in the ego ideal, drawn from narcissistic libido, sustains the ego's self-esteem by maintaining a sense of being valued in relation to this internalized standard; disruptions in this investment, such as when the ego falls short of the ideal, precipitate feelings of guilt or lead to depressive states through heightened . As outlined in Freud's 1923 formulation, this mechanism ensures that the ego ideal not only motivates but also emotionally reinforces conformity to superego demands. In normal development, the ego ideal motivates ethical behavior by prompting the ego to align its actions with these internalized standards, such as pursuing socially valued achievements or virtues modeled by parents, thereby promoting psychological equilibrium and adaptive functioning.

Differentiation from Punitive Superego Functions

The punitive aspects of the superego, rooted in the resolution of Oedipal conflicts, primarily function to enforce prohibitions and generate feelings of guilt and , compelling the individual to adhere to moral "do not" imperatives derived from internalized parental authority. In contrast, the ego ideal operates as an aspirational framework within the psychic structure, promoting ideals of what one "should be," thereby fostering self-motivation, pride, and a sense of accomplishment when the ego aligns with these elevated standards. This distinction highlights the superego's dual nature, where the ego ideal represents its more benevolent, guiding element, while the punitive functions emphasize restriction and self-reproach. In pathological conditions, an imbalance between these components can exacerbate psychological distress; for instance, if the punitive superego predominates without sufficient modulation by the ego ideal, it may lead to excessive harshness and unrelenting , manifesting as profound guilt or moral masochism. Conversely, an underdeveloped ego ideal relative to punitive forces can result in moral laxity or a weakened capacity for self-regulation, allowing id impulses to evade more readily. Freud described this dynamic as arising from the superego's inheritance of both parental demands for emulation ("You ought to be like this") and interdictions ("You may not be like this"), underscoring how the ego ideal's redemptive potential can temper the otherwise oppressive weight of . For example, in neurotic disorders, the punitive superego often induces anxiety through unrelenting prohibitions tied to Oedipal residues, creating a cycle of and inhibition; however, engagement with the ego ideal can mitigate this by providing aspirational pathways toward self-forgiveness and growth, redirecting libidinal energy from toward constructive identification. This interplay illustrates the ego ideal's role not as a mere counterpart but as a vital counterbalance to the superego's restrictive mechanisms, enabling psychic equilibrium.

Later Theoretical Perspectives

Ego Psychology Views

In ego psychology, emphasized the ego ideal as a rewarding and integrative component of the psyche, distinct from the superego's primarily punitive functions. In his seminal work, Fenichel described the ego ideal as emerging from positive identifications that foster self-approval and integration, contrasting it with the superego's role in enforcing prohibitions through guilt and criticism. This distinction builds on Freudian foundations, where the ego ideal originates as an early narcissistic structure that evolves into a guiding aspirational framework. The adaptive function of the ego ideal lies in its support for ego strength, enabling individuals to engage in mechanisms and sublimation that promote reality mastery. Through identifications with valued figures or ideals, the ego ideal facilitates the channeling of drives into socially constructive outlets, enhancing overall without reliance on defensive conflicts. This process strengthens the ego's capacity to navigate environmental demands, prioritizing integration over mere suppression of impulses. Heinz Hartmann further developed these ideas from 1939 onward, viewing the ego ideal as contributing to the ego's adaptive and reality-oriented , within his broader framework of ego functions operating independently of conflict. Hartmann viewed the ego ideal as contributing to adaptive by providing standards that guide non-pathological development and reality-oriented . This perspective shifted focus toward the ego's proactive role in adaptation, embedding the ego ideal in everyday functioning rather than solely in intrapsychic . In contemporary , the ego ideal maintains links to regulation, serving as a benchmark for evaluating personal achievements and maintaining adaptive equilibrium in non- contexts. By aligning actions with internalized ideals, it sustains a stable sense of worth, facilitating resilience in daily challenges without invoking defensive . This regulatory role underscores the ego ideal's enduring relevance in promoting psychological health through aspirational self-comparison.

Object Relations and Lacanian Interpretations

In , the ego ideal emerges from early interpersonal dynamics, particularly through the internalization of part-objects that shape self-representation. described how, in the paranoid-schizoid position, the infant's ego undergoes splitting, separating good and bad aspects of objects and self to manage persecutory anxieties; this process extends to the ego ideal, where good parts of the may be projected onto the , rendering her the idealized figure while impoverishing the ego. Such splitting fosters cycles of idealization, in which good object aspects are exaggerated as a defense against fears of , and , where bad elements are expelled to preserve the ideal.

Self-Psychological Extensions

In self-psychology, expanded on the ego ideal through the concept of the bipolar self, where the ego ideal forms part of the idealizing sector alongside the grandiose self in the mirroring sector. Kohut (1971) posited that the ego ideal develops via transmuting internalizations from empathic parental responses, regulating and cohesion. Pathological distortions arise from unmet idealizing needs, leading to narcissistic vulnerabilities rather than defensive splitting. This view integrates object relations with a focus on selfobject functions, emphasizing repair in through idealizing transferences. Otto Kernberg extended these ideas to pathological narcissism, viewing the ego ideal as fused with a pathological grandiose self that incorporates destructive introjects from early object relations, often aggressive or sadistic parental imagos integrated into the superego structure. In his 1975 work Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism, Kernberg argued that this fusion results in an ego ideal that pathologically regulates through omnipotent fantasies, perpetuating defensive splitting and derived from borderline organization. These destructive elements, stemming from failed integrations of good and bad objects, contribute to the chronic instability characteristic of narcissistic pathologies. In contrast to ego psychology's emphasis on the ego ideal as an adaptive, reality-oriented structure, Lacanian theory situates it within and imaginary registers, highlighting its role in desire and lack. , in his 1964 seminar The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, distinguished the ego ideal ( and demand-driven) from the ideal ego (imaginary and mirror-based), positing the former as a secondary identification with the paternal function and the of the Other. The ego ideal functions as the point in the from which the subject is seen, embodying the that structures desire through anticipation of ideals and internalization of social norms. This of the Other introduces lack into the subject's position, transforming the ego ideal into a signifier of unmet demands that propels the of desire beyond mere narcissistic unity.

Clinical Applications

Role in Individual Psychoanalysis

In individual , the therapeutic goal centers on strengthening a realistic ego ideal to mitigate narcissistic vulnerabilities and promote greater self-integration, allowing the patient to align their self-representations more closely with attainable aspirations rather than unattainable perfections. This process addresses how an overly rigid or grandiose ego ideal, often rooted in early identifications, contributes to chronic self-doubt, idealization of others, and defensive structures that hinder adaptive functioning. By refining the ego ideal, therapy fosters a more balanced regulation, reducing reliance on external validation and enabling the ego to mediate between id impulses and superego demands more effectively. Key techniques involve transference analysis, where the patient's projection of the ego ideal onto the analyst reveals distortions, such as viewing the therapist as an omnipotent figure embodying unattainable standards. Interpretations then target these projections, helping to dismantle rigid ideals by linking them to historical origins and encouraging flexibility in self-evaluation; for example, analysts explore how defensive idealizations maintain the status quo, gradually shifting the patient toward realistic self-appraisals. This work often briefly references the ego ideal's integration within the superego as a shared therapeutic target, emphasizing modification of both to alleviate internal conflicts. A representative case from adult analysis illustrates this: an unmarried woman in her thirties, plagued by grandiose self-concepts intertwined with dependency and depression, underwent therapy that addressed parental introjects forming her punitive ego ideal, leading to alleviated self-criticism through Freudian exploration of unconscious conflicts and ego psychology techniques focused on structural integration. By the fourth month, interpretations of her transference—projecting an idealizing dependency onto the analyst—facilitated self-assertion and reduced emotional turmoil, drawing on methods that trace self-critical standards back to internalized parental figures. Successful outcomes of such therapy involve revising the ego ideal to support better adaptation, with patients exhibiting enhanced autonomy and diminished pathological , as evidenced by 1960s studies at the Hampstead Clinic on superego modification through psychoanalytic intervention. These revisions enable the ego ideal to function as a supportive rather than tyrannical force, promoting long-term .

Applications in Child and Group Therapy

In child therapy, particularly at the Hampstead Child-Therapy Clinic during the 1980s, Joseph Sandler emphasized the use of play techniques to foster positive ego ideals among latency-age children, thereby mitigating the influence of a punitive superego that often manifests as excessive self-criticism and guilt. This approach builds on individual psychoanalytic methods by adapting them to the child's developmental stage, where play serves as a non-verbal medium for exploring and revising early identifications. In adolescent , the ego ideal plays a central in addressing identity crises, with revisions to the ideal self enabling greater self-regard and resolution of internal conflicts. Research from the highlighted how adolescents exhibiting rebellious behaviors often display inflated yet unrealistic self-appraisals tied to distorted ego ideals, contrasting with more balanced self-perceptions in conforming peers. Therapeutic interventions focus on deconstructing these rigid ideals through exploration of peer and familial influences, promoting adaptive revisions that integrate with realistic aspirations and reduce the turmoil of identity diffusion. Within group psychotherapy, the projection of the ego ideal onto the leader facilitates collective moral and emotional growth, as members initially idealize the therapist as an embodiment of unattainable standards. This dynamic, rooted in unconscious superego functions, fosters group cohesion but inevitably leads to disappointment and working through when the leader's human limitations emerge, prompting members to internalize more flexible ideals. A key technique involves analyzing this idealization process collaboratively, where group interactions reveal and dismantle primitive, perfectionistic aspects of the ego ideal, enhancing individual and shared self-regulation.

Cultural and Empirical Dimensions

Cultural Influences on Formation

The formation of the ego ideal is influenced by cultural norms, which shape the aspirational standards individuals internalize from early . Psychoanalytic perspectives highlight how culture forms components of the psyche, including the ego ideal, through parental guidance and societal expectations. In some non-Western contexts, cultural values foster interdependent -construals, where the ideal self involves contributions to and community. Cultural dimensions differentiate ego ideal development across societies. In individualistic cultures, such as the United States, the ego ideal often promotes autonomous goals, self-expression, and personal success. Conversely, in cultures with hierarchical structures, such as those in parts of Southeast Asia and North Africa, the ego ideal may align with deference to authority figures, reinforcing conformity and obedience. In oppressive cultural environments, the ego ideal can incorporate negative standards derived from societal pressures. Clinical elaborations from 1968 describe the negative ego ideal as an internalized superego component evoking humiliation and self-loathing upon violation, in contexts of authoritarian control. Contemporary cultural shifts, particularly through in the 2020s, have altered ego ideal formation by exposing individuals to globalized idealized images. Psychoanalytic analyses from a Lacanian perspective indicate that platforms like promote constructed personas and constant comparison, leading to externally driven self-standards that may exacerbate and dissatisfaction.

Empirical Research and Criticisms

Empirical research on the ego ideal remains limited, with studies primarily in from the mid- to late . Offer's 1960 research on adolescent self-regard and the ego ideal compared "rebel" and "cooperator" groups, finding that rebels exhibited unrealistic self-appraisals and inflated ego ideals, in contrast to the more realistic standards of cooperators. Related work on ego development, such as Adams and Shea's 1979 study, linked higher ego development levels to achieved identity status among adolescents and young adults, though distinct from direct ego ideal measurement. Post-2000 on the ego ideal is scant, often exploring indirect links to , such as associations between idealized self-representations and grandiose narcissism in young adults. Psychodynamic reviews in the note reliance on clinical data over empirical validation for superego functions, including the ego ideal. Criticisms of the ego ideal concept focus on its speculative nature and measurement challenges. The related construct of ego development is difficult to measure objectively, with tools like showing inconsistent validity and debates over from personality traits. Feminist critiques from the onward argue that Freud's framework implies a less developed superego and ego ideal in women due to identification patterns, reinforcing patriarchal norms. Challenges in integrating with persist as of 2025, with general self-ideal discrepancies associated with activation, but no specific fMRI correlates identified for ego ideal or superego processes. Recent developments from 2020 to 2025, including analyses of superego adaptations in the digital era, suggest the ego ideal may become more fluid due to social media-induced anxieties like (FOMO), challenging traditional stability assumptions. These reviews emphasize the need for updated empirical approaches.

References

  1. https://web.english.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Freud_SE_On_Narcissism_complete.pdf
  2. https://dictionary.apa.org/ego-ideal
  3. https://web.english.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Freud_SE_Ego_Id_complete.pdf
  4. https://pany.org/images/insight-article-docs/Class%204%20-%20Ego%20Ideal%2C%20Narcissistic%20%20Love.pdf
  5. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095744880
  6. https://www.lutecium.org/ftp/Freud/pdf/1914_on_narcissism.pdf
  7. https://www.sakkyndig.com/psykologi/artvit/freud1925.pdf
  8. https://www.journal-psychoanalysis.eu/articles/ideal-norm-and-law/
  9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6571602/
  10. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00754170600563638
  11. https://pep-web.org/browse/document/SE.019.0001A.P0028
  12. https://pep-web.org/browse/document/SE.019.0001A.P0031
  13. https://pep-web.org/browse/document/SE.022.0001A.P0067
  14. https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Freud_SE_Ego_Id_complete.pdf
  15. https://fromm-online.org/wp-content/uploads/excerpts/Fenichel_O_1954_B-029-Ex.pdf
  16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41207273
  17. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1984-06810-001
  18. https://web.english.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Klein_Notes_on_Some_Schizoid_Mechanisms.pdf
  19. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1972-21266-000
  20. https://fromm-online.org/wp-content/uploads/excerpts/Kernberg_O_1975_R-001-Ex.pdf
  21. https://www.davidbardschwarz.com/pdf/evans.pdf
  22. https://pep-web.org/search/document/PSC.018.0139A
  23. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/THE-EGO-IDEAL-AND-THE-IDEAL-SELF.-Sandler-Holder/18858b4f38ad3df8e8e1b5638b2e5fb2f07ada5c
  24. https://pep-web.org/browse/document/APA.012.0517A
  25. https://pep-web.org/browse/document/PSC.015.0128A
  26. https://archive.org/details/techniqueofchild0000sand
  27. https://psychoanalysis.org.uk/joseph-sandler
  28. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1960-01729-001
  29. https://www.academia.edu/37327712/Erik_H_Erikson_Identity_Youth_and_Crisis_1_1968_W_W_Norton_and_Company_1_
  30. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01456468
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724000786
  32. https://doi.org/10.32111/SAS.2022.2.2.4
  33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-440X(68)80011-2
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360622141_Fill_me_distract_me_a_Lacanian_psychoanalytical_view_on_social_media
  35. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02087617
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5342670_Egos_Inflating_Over_Time_A_Cross-Temporal_Meta-Analysis_of_the_Narcissistic_Personality_Inventory
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10263376/
  38. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11781038/
  39. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-psychoanalysis/
  40. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24140952/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.