Hubbry Logo
Finite morphismFinite morphismMain
Open search
Finite morphism
Community hub
Finite morphism
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Finite morphism
Finite morphism
from Wikipedia

In algebraic geometry, a finite morphism between two affine varieties is a dense regular map which induces isomorphic inclusion between their coordinate rings, such that is integral over .[1] This definition can be extended to the quasi-projective varieties, such that a regular map between quasiprojective varieties is finite if any point has an affine neighbourhood V such that is affine and is a finite map (in view of the previous definition, because it is between affine varieties).[2]

Definition by schemes

[edit]

A morphism f: XY of schemes is a finite morphism if Y has an open cover by affine schemes

such that for each i,

is an open affine subscheme Spec Ai, and the restriction of f to Ui, which induces a ring homomorphism

makes Ai a finitely generated module over Bi (in other words, a finite Bi-algebra).[3] One also says that X is finite over Y.

In fact, f is finite if and only if for every open affine subscheme V = Spec B in Y, the inverse image of V in X is affine, of the form Spec A, with A a finitely generated B-module.[4]

For example, for any field k, is a finite morphism since as -modules. Geometrically, this is obviously finite since this is a ramified n-sheeted cover of the affine line which degenerates at the origin. By contrast, the inclusion of A1 − 0 into A1 is not finite. (Indeed, the Laurent polynomial ring k[y, y−1] is not finitely generated as a module over k[y].) This restricts our geometric intuition to surjective families with finite fibers.

Properties of finite morphisms

[edit]
  • The composition of two finite morphisms is finite.
  • Any base change of a finite morphism f: XY is finite. That is, if g: Z → Y is any morphism of schemes, then the resulting morphism X ×Y ZZ is finite. This corresponds to the following algebraic statement: if A and C are (commutative) B-algebras, and A is finitely generated as a B-module, then the tensor product AB C is finitely generated as a C-module. Indeed, the generators can be taken to be the elements ai ⊗ 1, where ai are the given generators of A as a B-module.
  • Closed immersions are finite, as they are locally given by AA/I, where I is the ideal (section of the ideal sheaf) corresponding to the closed subscheme.
  • Finite morphisms are closed, hence (because of their stability under base change) proper.[4] This follows from the going up theorem of Cohen-Seidenberg in commutative algebra.
  • Finite morphisms have finite fibers (that is, they are quasi-finite).[4] This follows from the fact that for a field k, every finite k-algebra is an Artinian ring. A related statement is that for a finite surjective morphism f: XY, X and Y have the same dimension.
  • By Deligne, a morphism of schemes is finite if and only if it is proper and quasi-finite.[5] This had been shown by Grothendieck if the morphism f: XY is locally of finite presentation, which follows from the other assumptions if Y is Noetherian.[6]
  • Finite morphisms are both projective and affine.[4]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In , a finite morphism is a of schemes f:XSf: X \to S that is affine and such that, for every affine open subscheme Spec(R)S\operatorname{Spec}(R) \subset S, the preimage f1(Spec(R))=Spec(A)f^{-1}(\operatorname{Spec}(R)) = \operatorname{Spec}(A) corresponds to a RAR \to A making AA a finite RR-module. Finite morphisms exhibit several key properties that make them fundamental in the study of scheme theory. They are necessarily of finite type, separated, quasi-compact, proper, and , meaning the ring extensions satisfy monic polynomial equations over the base ring. Moreover, finite morphisms are stable under composition and base change, allowing them to behave well in families and diagrams of schemes. These morphisms generalize closed immersions. For instance, the morphism induced by a finite étale extension of fields, such as Spec(Q(2))Spec(Q)\operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})) \to \operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{Q})
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.