Hubbry Logo
Five-paragraph essayFive-paragraph essayMain
Open search
Five-paragraph essay
Community hub
Five-paragraph essay
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Five-paragraph essay
Five-paragraph essay
Five-paragraph essay
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The five-paragraph essay is a common essay format that comprises an introductory with a thesis, three body paragraphs that develop supporting points, and a conclusion.The format is widely taught in U.S. secondary education and is sometimes referred to as a "hamburger essay" in K–12 contexts that use a layered graphic organizer for paragraphs and essays.[1][2]

Scholars have linked the form to earlier traditions of theme‑writing in current‑traditional rhetoric,[3] and debate continues over its pedagogical value.[4][5][6]

Form

[edit]

The five-paragraph essay is a structured form of essay writing that consists of five distinct paragraphs:

  • introduction (one paragraph)
  • Body paragraphs (three paragraphs)
  • Conclusion (one paragraph)

Structure

[edit]

The introductory paragraph serves to present the main idea of the essay and introduce the thesis statement.[7] It often begins with a narrative hook to capture the reader's interest, followed by a sentence that provides a general theme and another that narrows the focus. If the essay is based on a literary text, a sentence referencing the work and its author may be included (e.g., "In the book Night, Elie Wiesel states..."). The introduction typically concludes with the thesis statement, which outlines the central argument of the essay. Additionally, an organizational sentence may be included to indicate the structure and sequence of the body paragraphs.

The three body paragraphs each present supporting evidence or arguments that reinforce the thesis statement. Each paragraph generally begins with a topic sentence, followed by analysis and examples that substantiate the argument.[8]

The concluding paragraph summarizes the main points of the essay and restates the thesis in a broader context.[9] It often provides a final perspective on the topic and reinforces the significance of the argument. For example, in an essay on sports, a conclusion might state: "Sports offer numerous benefits for youth, including improved physical health, better circulation, and enhanced stamina. Additionally, they contribute to the development of social and organizational skills, which are valuable in both personal and professional life."

History

[edit]

Composition scholars trace the modern five‑paragraph essay to nineteenth‑ and twentieth‑century “theme‑writing” associated with current‑traditional rhetoric. This lineage emphasized fixed forms and correctness over invention and situation‑specific choices.[3]

Pedagogical debate

[edit]

According to Thomas E. Nunnally[10] and Kimberly Wesley,[11] most teachers and professors consider the five-paragraph form ultimately restricting for fully developing an idea. Wesley argues that the form is never appropriate. Nunnally states that the form can be good for developing analytical skills that should then be expanded. Similarly, American educator David F. Labaree claims that "The Rule of Five" is "dysfunctional... off-putting, infantilising and intellectually arid" because demands for the essay's form often obscure its meaning and, therefore, largely automatize creating and reading five-paragraph essays.[12] The five-paragraph essay format has been criticized for its rigid structure, which some educators believe stifles creativity and critical thinking. Critics argue that it promotes a formulaic approach to writing, which can limit students' ability to express more complex ideas and develop their unique writing style.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Five-paragraph essay

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The five-paragraph essay is a structured format commonly used in introductory composition courses, consisting of an introductory paragraph that includes a , three body paragraphs each focused on a distinct supporting point with evidence and analysis, and a concluding paragraph that restates the thesis and synthesizes the main ideas. This format emerged from the current-traditional rhetoric prevalent in mid-19th-century American education, where short "theme-writing" exercises emphasized clear organization and mechanical correctness over invention or audience adaptation, drawing on earlier classical rhetorical principles adapted for school settings. By the late 19th century, figures like Barrett Wendell at Harvard formalized similar structured themes for student practice, and the five-paragraph model gained prominence in the mid-20th century through pedagogical articles, such as Victor Pudlowski's 1959 promotion of it as an efficient teaching tool for basic exposition. Its rigid template—often featuring a three-part thesis mapped directly to the body paragraphs—reflects a shift toward product-oriented writing instruction that prioritizes form to build student confidence in producing coherent texts. Widely adopted in U.S. K-12 and first-year college curricula since the 1970s, the five-paragraph essay serves as a foundational scaffold for writers, facilitating skills in argumentation, , or while aligning with standardized assessments that reward predictable . Despite its enduring —evidenced by its inclusion in state writing standards and textbooks—it faces ongoing critique from composition scholars for encouraging formulaic, repetitive structures that hinder rhetorical sophistication, awareness, and original thinking in more advanced discourse.

Origins and Development

Historical Background

The five-paragraph essay emerged in the context of 19th-century , particularly within the current-traditional that emphasized formal and mechanical correctness over inventive processes. This approach drew influences from classical rhetorical principles, which were adapted into simplified theme-writing practices for school compositions to facilitate clear . Scholars trace its roots to theme-writing exercises in English , where short, structured essays served as drills in composition for emerging public school systems. In the , American educators promoted formulaic writing structures as tools for literacy instruction, especially in programs aimed at immigrant assimilation and for working-class students. Key proponents included Fred Newton Scott and Joseph Villiers Denney, whose 1893 textbook Paragraph-Writing outlined methods for constructing unified paragraphs and cohesive essays, contributing to early structured composition practices. Similarly, Harvard professor Barrett Wendell's English Composition (1891) advocated structured writing exercises to build rhetorical skills, often applied in urban school settings to standardize instruction for diverse immigrant populations seeking entry into higher education. These efforts reflected broader educational reforms that used rigid formats to "Americanize" newcomers through efficient, measurable writing tasks. By the , structured theme-writing gained widespread documentation in U.S. textbooks, with elements that would evolve into the standard five-paragraph model for argumentative writing in high school curricula. Educators contemporary to , such as those aligned with current-traditional like Adams Sherman Hill, emphasized logical progression and formal arrangement in texts that prioritized structured argumentation, contrasting Dewey's progressive focus on . For instance, composition manuals from the era, including revisions of earlier works like Scott and Denney's, integrated templates supporting uniform teaching amid expanding secondary enrollment. A notable shift occurred in the 1930s, when high school writing instruction increasingly incorporated rigid templates, driven by the need to standardize grading and align with emerging standardized testing. This evolution facilitated objective in overcrowded classrooms, as teachers adopted structured formats for their simplicity in assessing student output, though critics like Stella Marks (1936) warned that formulaic approaches stifled originality. The template became entrenched as a pedagogical staple, reflecting broader curricular demands for efficiency in evaluating essays. In 1959, Victor Pudlowski promoted the five-paragraph essay in a pedagogical article as an efficient tool for teaching basic exposition, formalizing its structure with a three-part thesis directly mapping to the body paragraphs.

Adoption in Education

The five-paragraph essay experienced significant adoption in U.S. public schools following World War II, particularly during the 1950s, as curricula increasingly emphasized structured writing to prepare students for emerging standardized testing requirements. This period saw a boom in enrollment and educational standardization, with the format promoted in teacher training programs and textbooks for its simplicity in addressing time-constrained prompts on assessments like early state exams. Educators, influenced by their own 1950s schooling experiences, integrated it as a core instructional tool, reinforcing its role in secondary English classes by the early 1960s through widely distributed resources such as Warriner's English Grammar and Composition series. The format's institutionalization extended internationally, appearing in English as a (EFL) and English as a (ESL) curricula, where it served as a scaffold for non-native speakers to develop coherence and argumentation in . Studies show its use in first-year ESL writing classrooms worldwide, aiding transition to higher education demands. Surveys from the , including those by writing researcher Steve Graham, indicate its prevalence in over half of U.S. classrooms, often as the primary form taught across subjects to build foundational skills. Its role was further entrenched by , such as the SAT's essay section (discontinued in 2021), which from its introduction in 2005 until reforms in favored formulaic, structured responses, though later shifts emphasized evidence-based analysis.

Core Structure

The five-paragraph essay is often referred to as the "hamburger essay" in educational contexts, where the structure is metaphorically compared to a hamburger: the top bun representing the introduction, the patties and fillings the body paragraphs, and the bottom bun the conclusion. This analogy serves as a visual teaching aid for essay organization.

Introduction Paragraph

The introduction paragraph in the five-paragraph essay serves as the foundational element, designed to engage , provide essential context, and present the central argument of the entire piece. It typically comprises four to six sentences, allowing sufficient space to orient the audience without introducing supporting evidence, which is reserved for subsequent sections. The paragraph follows a structured progression: beginning with a hook to capture attention, followed by background information to establish relevance, and culminating in a that outlines the essay's direction. The , as the , aims to draw the reader in through an engaging device such as a , a relevant quote, a startling , or an intriguing statement directly tied to the topic. This is succeeded by two to three sentences of background context, which supply necessary details about the subject to bridge the hook and the , ensuring the reader grasps the essay's scope without overwhelming them with specifics. The , positioned as the final sentence, must be a single, precise declaration that articulates the main argument while explicitly previewing the three supporting points to be developed later—for instance, " harms by increasing anxiety, promoting unrealistic standards, and reducing face-to-face interactions." This formulaic approach—topic plus position—ensures clarity and alignment with the essay's tripartite body structure. Writers must avoid common pitfalls that undermine the introduction's effectiveness, such as employing vague or clichéd hooks that fail to connect meaningfully to the topic. For example, a weak hook like " was one of the greatest tragedies in American history" lacks specificity and engagement; a revision process involves replacing it with a targeted alternative, such as a provocative question—"How did become both a tool of and liberation for enslaved individuals in 19th-century America?"—to better prepare readers for the . Other frequent errors include restating the essay prompt verbatim or resorting to definitions, both of which dilute and fail to build anticipation for the argument. By refining these elements, the introduction not only hooks the audience but also sets a roadmap for the body paragraphs to expand upon the points.

Body Paragraphs

The body paragraphs form the core of the five-paragraph essay, consisting of three distinct sections that provide detailed support for the introduced in the opening paragraph. Each body paragraph corresponds to one specific point outlined in the thesis, ensuring a balanced of the topic; for instance, if the thesis addresses causes, effects, and solutions to a problem, one paragraph would focus on each aspect without overlapping ideas. This mirroring structure promotes logical progression and comprehensive coverage, as each paragraph develops a single supporting argument in depth. A typical body paragraph begins with a topic sentence that restates or elaborates on one point from the thesis, setting the focus for the entire section. This is followed by two to three sentences offering evidence or examples, such as facts, statistics, quotations, or anecdotes, to substantiate the claim. The paragraph concludes with a linking sentence that reinforces the point's relevance to the thesis while transitioning smoothly to the next , maintaining overall coherence. Transitions play a crucial role in connecting the body paragraphs, using phrases like "furthermore" to add supporting ideas, "in addition" to build upon previous points, or "in contrast" to highlight differences between arguments. These elements ensure the essay flows logically from one idea to the next, preventing abrupt shifts and reinforcing the interconnectedness of the points. For example, a transition might read: "While social media offers connectivity, furthermore, its role in exacerbating anxiety reveals deeper psychological costs." Unity is emphasized in each body paragraph, with all content strictly limited to developing one central idea to avoid dilution of the argument. Writers are instructed to eliminate any details, ensuring that directly ties back to the and contributes to the essay's overarching purpose. This focused approach helps maintain clarity and persuasiveness throughout the three paragraphs. To illustrate, consider a body paragraph addressing the point that contributes to anxiety among youth, within an whose examines its causes, effects, and mitigation strategies. The paragraph might read: "One primary cause of anxiety in adolescents stems from the constant comparison fostered by platforms. Nearly half (46%) of adolescents aged 13–17 reported that makes them feel worse about their , leading to heightened self-doubt and stress. For instance, a review of 32 studies found that over half (56.3%) reported positive associations between use and anxiety among adolescents. This pressure not only affects daily mood but also transitions into broader effects on , as explored next." This structure—, evidentiary support with citations, and linking transition—exemplifies the paragraph's role in advancing the .

Conclusion Paragraph

The conclusion paragraph in the five-paragraph essay serves to reinforce the central and provide a sense of closure, effectively bookending the by mirroring the introduction's structure while synthesizing the preceding arguments. It typically consists of four to five sentences, beginning with a restatement of the using varied wording to avoid repetition, followed by a brief summary of the three main points from the body paragraphs—one sentence per point—to remind the reader of the supporting evidence without reintroducing details. A critical rule is that no new information or ideas should be introduced, ensuring the paragraph focuses solely on unifying and reinforcing what has already been established. The paragraph culminates in a broader implication, final reflection, or , which leaves a lasting impression on the reader and extends the essay's significance beyond its immediate scope. For instance, in an essay on the impacts of , the conclusion might end with a statement like, "Ultimately, mitigating these effects requires mindful usage to foster healthier digital habits," emphasizing practical application without introducing novel concepts. This closing element often ties back subtly to the introduction's , creating and cohesion. Variations in tone can adapt the conclusion to the essay's purpose; persuasive essays, for example, may employ an emphatic closing to urge action or highlight urgency, while expository pieces might opt for a more reflective generalization. Overall, this ensures the conclusion reinforces the thesis's validity through synthesis, promoting a balanced and memorable end to the essay.

Pedagogical Applications

Teaching Methods

Teaching the five-paragraph essay typically involves structured lesson plans that guide students through the writing process in a scaffolded manner. Educators often begin with brainstorming sessions to develop a strong thesis statement, where students generate ideas on a topic and refine them into a clear, arguable claim that previews the essay's main points. This is followed by outlining the body points, during which students map out three supporting arguments, including potential evidence and examples for each, using simple lists or visual aids to ensure logical progression. Drafting then incorporates peer review, where students exchange initial drafts in small groups to provide feedback on content relevance and organization, fostering collaborative improvement before individual revisions. The final stage emphasizes revising for transitions, with mini-lessons on linking phrases to connect paragraphs smoothly and reinforce the essay's cohesion. To support these steps, teachers employ graphic organizers tailored to the essay's structure, such as paragraph templates that outline topic sentences, supporting details, and concluding sentences for each body paragraph. These tools help students visualize the flow from introduction to conclusion. For grades 5-12, prompts are adapted to developmental levels; younger students might use simple topics like "My Favorite Hobby" to practice basic thesis formulation, while older learners tackle argumentative prompts such as "Should School Uniforms Be Mandatory?" to build evidence-based reasoning. Such prompts encourage iterative practice, starting with single-paragraph exercises before expanding to full essays. Technology integration enhances these methods by enabling digital outlining and collaboration. Software like or allows students to create interactive outlines for body points, dragging and dropping evidence to test structure. A specific example is using for collaborative body paragraph development, where groups co-edit drafts in real-time, inserting comments for peer suggestions on evidence integration and transitions, which streamlines feedback and revision. Assessment of five-paragraph essays relies on rubrics that prioritize structure adherence, ensuring students meet key organizational criteria. These rubrics typically evaluate elements like paragraph unity and logical flow, with dedicated categories for the introduction's effectiveness. For instance, clarity—assessing the statement's precision and alignment with the prompt—is often emphasized to underscore its foundational role.

Benefits for Students

The five-paragraph builds organization skills through its clear , which aids beginners in developing a logical progression of ideas from introduction to conclusion. This structured format—featuring an introductory paragraph with a , three supporting body paragraphs, and a concluding summary—serves as an entry-level strategy for young writers, allowing them to focus on one element at a time, such as topic sentences and transitions, while monitoring progress in manageable steps. By providing a predictable framework, it helps students systematically organize their thoughts, reducing overwhelm and fostering confidence in composition. The format enhances argumentation by enforcing a -evidence-conclusion flow within each , guiding writers to present claims supported by relevant details and . This emphasis on structured improves overall coherence, as evidenced by interventions where multilingual writers showed rubric score gains, such as statements rising from an average of 0.7 to 2.5 over 12 weeks, alongside advancements in (1.5 to 2.7) and elements of argumentation. Such targeted practice equips students with foundational skills for constructing persuasive texts. In timed writing scenarios, the five-paragraph essay promotes effective , enabling students to allocate portions of limited time for outlining, developing body paragraphs, and wrapping up, which is especially beneficial for standardized tests like the ACT. The ACT writing section, with its 40-minute constraint, often aligns with this structure in sample prompts and high-scoring responses, helping test-takers maintain focus and completeness under pressure. Its predictable and repetitive design also enhances accessibility for diverse learners, including those with learning differences, by offering a straightforward template that minimizes and supports step-by-step composition. Educators note that this clarity benefits inexperienced and students with learning disabilities, facilitating inclusion in general writing tasks without requiring advanced rhetorical flexibility. Strategies incorporating the format, such as approaches, have enabled students with disabilities to produce full essays with supporting effectively.

Criticisms and Limitations

Structural Rigidity

The five-paragraph essay's requirement of a three-point often results in superficial treatment of topics, as writers are compelled to divide complex ideas into exactly three supporting points regardless of the subject's depth. This rigid division can oversimplify nuanced arguments, such as those involving multifaceted social issues or historical events, where more or fewer points might better capture the intricacies. For instance, composition scholar David Labaree argues that the format prioritizes mechanical structure over substantive analysis, leading to essays that "The ability to produce a five-paragraph essay will be at the expense of learning to write persuasive arguments." Similarly, Peter Elbow describes the model as an "anti-perplexity machine," noting that it leaves "no room for the untidiness of inquiry or complexity," thereby hindering engagement with topics that demand iterative exploration. The repetitive structure—introduction, three body paragraphs, and conclusion—further discourages flexibility in sentence variety, rhetorical strategies, and overall flow, often reducing essays to predictable patterns that prioritize over . In literary , for example, this format frequently confines discussions to basic plot summaries and three isolated themes, sidelining deeper interpretive techniques like or intertextual connections that require fluid organization. Studies of college composition reveal how this rigidity fosters a sense of being "stuck," with one reflecting that the model taught her to "separate myself" from her writing, resulting in passionless, formulaic output. Scholars like Kimberly Campbell echo this, stating that the format "stifles creativity and takes away the thinking process that is key for good writing," particularly for developing original voice. Scholars critique how the structure flattens individual style in favor of rote adherence. In contrast to educational settings, professional essays—such as those in , academia, or opinion pieces—rarely adhere to this mold, instead employing varied lengths, nonlinear progression, and adaptive structures to suit audience needs and argumentative goals. This disconnect highlights the format's pedagogical isolation from real-world writing demands.

Impact on Writing Skills

Over-reliance on the five-paragraph essay in has been shown to hinder students' skills by emphasizing formulaic structure over genuine inquiry and idea exploration. This approach often results in "paint-by-numbers" essays, where students focus on filling predefined slots rather than developing original arguments or probing deeper interpretations, thereby limiting the depth of and . For instance, educators argue that the rigid format discourages sustained , as it prioritizes mechanical organization over the of ideas essential for advanced writing. This formulaic training also reduces students' adaptability to more complex genres, such as research papers or analytical essays, which require flexible structures and nuanced argumentation. instructors frequently report challenges in transitioning students away from this model, noting that it produces predictable but superficial writing that fails to meet higher education demands. According to ACT data from 2016, only 38 percent of high school graduates met college readiness benchmarks in at least three subject areas, including writing, highlighting widespread struggles with non-formulaic tasks among incoming freshmen. The psychological effects of this rigid format include increased writing anxiety and diminished , particularly in advanced courses where expectations shift toward creative and expressive work. Students accustomed to the may experience and lower when faced with open-ended assignments, as the structure's constraints foster a sense of inadequacy beyond its boundaries. A 2008 analysis describes this as reinforcing a "deficit model" of , where the format is imposed on students perceived as underprepared, exacerbating demotivation and self-doubt. Furthermore, the five-paragraph essay disproportionately impacts underrepresented students' expressive writing abilities, perpetuating equity issues by favoring standardized forms that may not align with diverse cultural or linguistic backgrounds. This approach can suppress voice and styles common among minority groups, leading to lower confidence in non-formulaic expression and widening achievement gaps in higher education. Studies indicate that working-class and underrepresented students, often tracked into remedial writing reliant on such formulas, face heightened barriers to developing authentic, genre-diverse proficiency.

Variations and Modern Adaptations

Extended Formats

The five-paragraph essay model can be extended for longer compositions by incorporating additional body paragraphs that deepen the analysis without altering the fundamental structure of an introduction, supporting body, and conclusion. This expansion allows writers to explore topics more thoroughly while adhering to the original framework's emphasis on logical progression and support. According to a writing outline from Bucks County , the model is flexible enough to include more than three body paragraphs, each designed to probe the subject in greater detail through topic sentences, , and transitions for coherence. A common extension scales the format to seven paragraphs by adding a dedicated paragraph following the primary supporting points. This addition acknowledges opposing views to bolster the essay's credibility, with the typically followed by a that reaffirms the . The Writing Center advises integrating such paragraphs to address potential objections, ensuring they align with and strengthen the central claim rather than dilute it. Similarly, the University Writing & Speaking Center at the , describes this as a key strategy for essays, where the paragraph maintains focus by directly refuting challenges with evidence tied to the . For even more comprehensive pieces, the structure can expand to nine paragraphs by including multiple additional evidence paragraphs, resulting in four or five body sections overall. Guidelines for these transitions stress the importance of alignment, recommending that each new begin with a clear linked to the main argument and use transitional phrases to ensure smooth flow. The St. Louis writing resources emphasize that such extensions should probe specific aspects of the topic, like elaborating on sub-claims with examples, while avoiding deviation from the core to preserve unity. In high school (AP) English courses, these extended formats act as an effective bridge to full papers by building skills in integration and argumentation depth. AP Language and Composition exams often reward essays that go beyond the basic five paragraphs to include counterarguments or additional supports, fostering the analytical rigor required for college-level writing. AP preparation materials note that this structured expansion helps students transition from formulaic responses to more nuanced analyses, aligning with rubric expectations for sophisticated reasoning.

Integration with Other Styles

The five-paragraph essay can incorporate narrative elements by integrating storytelling hooks, such as personal anecdotes, into the introduction to engage readers while maintaining its argumentative framework. This approach allows writers to draw from memoir-like techniques, where a brief sets the for the , fostering emotional connection without derailing the structured progression to body paragraphs. For instance, in persuasive essays on social issues, an opening about a personal experience can illustrate the topic's relevance before transitioning to evidence-based claims. In analytical writing, the five-paragraph essay adapts by textual evidence, such as quotes from sources, within body paragraphs to support critiques, aligning with guidelines like those in MLA style for proper citation and integration. This is particularly evident in film analyses, where the introduction outlines the thesis on , body paragraphs dissect scenes with direct quotations or paraphrases from and reviews, and the conclusion synthesizes interpretive insights. Such ensures analytical depth while adhering to the essay's concise format, promoting evidence-driven arguments over unsubstantiated opinion. Global influences enable the five-paragraph essay to blend with non-Western rhetorical structures, such as the Japanese ki-sho-ten-ketsu pattern (introduction-development-twist-conclusion), particularly in EFL contexts where deductive are adapted to accommodate inductive elements. In Japanese writing courses, students initially favor delayed placement reflective of ki-sho-ten-ketsu's "guessing game" style but gradually fuse it with the five-paragraph's upfront argumentative core through targeted feedback, resulting in hybrid essays that introduce context (ki-sho), introduce a twist via evidence (ten), and conclude deductively (ketsu). This integration bridges cultural rhetorical differences, enhancing adaptability for international . Digital adaptations since the have evolved the five-paragraph essay through edtech tools, incorporating embeds like images, videos, or hyperlinks into body paragraphs to enrich argumentative support. In online platforms, students create hybrid essays where visual elements, such as embedded film clips in analytical critiques, function as "evidence" akin to textual quotes, aligning with multimodal composing principles that extend linguistic modes into digital formats. This trend, driven by tools like screencasting and software, maintains the essay's structural integrity while accommodating , as seen in K-12 projects that pair hooks with video anecdotes.

References

  1. https://www.umgc.edu/current-students/learning-resources/writing-center/writing-resources/writing/secrets-five-paragraph-essay
  2. https://www.bucks.edu/media/bcccmedialibrary/pdf/FiveParagraphEssayOutlineJuly08_000.pdf
  3. https://publicationsncte.org/content/journals/10.58680/tetyc201117294
  4. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=honorstheses
  5. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42003457
  6. https://archive.org/details/englishcompositi00wendrich
  7. https://etd.auburn.edu/bitstream/handle/10415/2398/Dissertation-%20Moving%20High%20School%20Juniors%20Beyond%20the%20Five%20Paragraph%20Essay%20through%20Teacher%20Modeling.pdf?sequence=2
  8. https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/is-the-five-paragraph-essay-history/2016/06
  9. https://lchc.ucsd.edu/MCA/Mail/xmcamail.2004_01.dir/att-0104/01-RTE2003.pdf
  10. https://escholarship.org/content/qt4m59f7j8/qt4m59f7j8_noSplash_68d0feea8d7d655602a026e7dc304df5.pdf
  11. https://teach.nwp.org/the-five-paragraph-theme-redux/
  12. https://www.ultius.com/ultius-blog/entry/top-5-changes-to-the-sat-essay-in-march-2016.html
  13. https://www.tcd.ie/disability/services/essay-and-writing-support/how-to-plan-and-write-an-essay/the-hamburger-essay-plan/
  14. https://www.eastcentral.edu/learning-center/wp-content/uploads/sites/27/2023/07/Traditional-Five-Paragraph-Essay-Structure.pdf
  15. https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/introductions/
  16. https://www.iwu.edu/writing-center/student-resources/fiveparaessaymovebeyond.pdf
  17. https://www.sjsu.edu/writingcenter/docs/handouts/Body%20Paragraphs.pdf
  18. https://writingcenter.fas.harvard.edu/anatomy-body-paragraph
  19. https://depts.washington.edu/owrcweb/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Strong-Body-Paragraphs.pdf
  20. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/sg-youth-mental-health-social-media-advisory.pdf
  21. https://www.jahonline.org/article/S1054-139X%2824%2900433-6/abstract
  22. https://www.cuyamaca.edu/student-support/tutoring-center/files/student-resources/five-paragraph-outline-guide.pdf
  23. https://www.losmedanos.edu/core/documents/EssayStructureFall2011.pdf
  24. https://www.cultofpedagogy.com/persuasive-writing/
  25. https://literacyideas.com/how-to-write-a-5-paragraph-essay/
  26. https://www.lucidchart.com/blog/graphic-organizers-for-writing-essays
  27. https://www.mindmeister.com/2591350935/outline-5-paragraph-essay
  28. https://eductive.ca/en/resource/using-google-docs-to-teach-essay-writing-and-create-an-environment-for-peer-learning/
  29. https://www.readwritethink.org/classroom-resources/printouts/essay-rubric
  30. https://resources.saylor.org/wwwresources/archived/site/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/K12ELA7-3.3.9.2-FiveParagraphRubric-BY-SA.pdf
  31. https://www.edweek.org/education/opinion-should-we-teach-the-five-paragraph-essay/2012/10
  32. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/beyond-the-five-paragraph-essay
  33. https://blog.prepscholar.com/act-essay-format-and-templates
  34. https://www.act.org/content/act/en/products-and-services/the-act/test-preparation/writing-sample-essays.html
  35. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09388982251359640
  36. https://aeon.co/essays/writing-essays-by-formula-teaches-students-how-to-not-think
  37. https://blog.heinemann.com/why-the-five-paragraph-essay-is-a-problem-now-and-later
  38. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/wte/vol3/iss2/10
  39. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2017-10-18-is-the-five-paragraph-essay-dead
  40. https://writing.berkeley.edu/news/unlearning-five-paragraph-essay
  41. https://www.act.org/content/act/en/newsroom/act-scores-down-for-2016-us-grad-class-due-to-increased-percentage-of-students-tested.html
  42. https://writingcenter.fas.harvard.edu/counterargument
  43. https://www.unr.edu/writing-speaking-center/writing-speaking-resources/counterarguments
  44. https://stlcc.edu/student-support/academic-success-and-tutoring/writing-center/writing-resources/counterargument.aspx
  45. https://www.barronseduc.com/blogs/ap/post/english-language-and-composition/essay-questions
  46. https://open.baypath.edu/eng114/chapter/kp-3-3a/
  47. https://odp.library.tamu.edu/informedarguments/chapter/drafting/
  48. https://nationsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/NU-Writing-Guide-rev4-17.pdf
  49. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/essay_writing/argumentative_essays.html
  50. https://doi.org/10.26855/er.2022.06.005
  51. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1983.3.2.183
  52. https://digitalauthorship.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/hobbs-and-moore-pvkbook-03-15-12-final.pdf
  53. https://campus.kennesaw.edu/current-students/academics/writing-center/open-educational-resources/pdf-chapters/introduction-strategies-multimodal-composing.php
  54. https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1097&context=utk_gradthes
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.