Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Engagement
View on WikipediaThis article needs additional citations for verification. (April 2009) |

An engagement or betrothal is the period of time between the declaration of acceptance of a marriage proposal and the marriage itself (which is typically but not always commenced with a wedding). During this period, a couple is said to be fiancés (from the French), "betrothed", "intended", "affianced", "engaged to be married", or simply "engaged". Future brides and grooms may be called fiancée (feminine) or fiancé (masculine), "the betrothed", "wife-to-be" or "husband-to-be", respectively. The duration of the courtship varies vastly, and is largely dependent on cultural norms or upon the agreement of the parties involved.
Long engagements were once common in formal arranged marriages, and it was not uncommon for parents betrothing children to arrange marriages many years before the engaged couple were old enough. This is still done in some countries.
Many traditional Christian denominations have optional rites for Christian betrothal (also known as "blessing an engaged couple" or "declaration of intention") that bless and ratify the intent of a couple to marry before God and the Church.[1][2][3][4]
Origin
[edit]The origins of European engagement in marriage practice are found in the Jewish law (Torah), first exemplified by Abraham, and outlined in the last Talmudic tractate of the Nashim (Women) order, where marriage consists of two separate acts, called erusin (or kiddushin, meaning sanctification), which is the betrothal ceremony, and nissu'in or chupah,[a] the actual ceremony for the marriage. Erusin changes the couple's interpersonal status, while nissu'in brings about the legal consequences of the change of status. (However, in the Talmud and other sources of Jewish law there is also a process, called shiduchin, corresponding to what today is called engagement. Marrying without such an agreement is considered immoral.[5] To complicate matters, erusin in modern Hebrew means engagement, not betrothal.)
This was later adopted in ancient Greece as the gamos and engeysis rituals, although unlike in Judaism, the contract made in front of witness was only verbal.[6] The giving of a ring was eventually borrowed from Judaism by Roman marriage law, with the fiancé presenting it after swearing the oath of marriage intent, and presenting of the gifts at the engagement party.[7]
Betrothal
[edit]
Betrothal (also called "espousal") is a formal state of engagement to be married.[additional citation(s) needed]
Typical steps of a match were the following:
- Negotiation of a match, usually done by the couple's families with bride and groom having varying levels of input, from no input, to veto power, to a fuller voice in the selection of marriage partner.
- This is not as widely practiced as it was historically, although it is still common in culturally conservative communities in Israel, India, Africa, and Arab states of the Persian Gulf, although most of these have a requirement that the bride be at least allowed veto power.
- Negotiation of bride price or dowry
- In most cultures evolved from Europe, bride prices or dowries have been reduced to the engagement ring accompanying the marriage contract, while in other cultures, such as those on the Arabian Peninsula, they are still part of negotiating a marriage contract.
- Blessing by the parents and clergy
- Exchange of vows and signing of contracts
- Often one of these is omitted
- Celebration

The exact duration of a betrothal varies according to culture and the participants’ needs and wishes. For adults, it may be anywhere from several hours (when the betrothal is incorporated into the wedding day itself) to a period of several years. A year and a day are common in neo-pagan groups today. In the case of child marriage, betrothal might last from infancy until the age of marriage.
The responsibilities and privileges of betrothal vary. In most cultures, the betrothed couple is expected to spend much time together, learning about each other. In some historical cultures (including colonial North America), the betrothal was essentially a trial marriage, with marriage only being required in cases of conception of a child.[citation needed] Almost all cultures are loosening restrictions against physical contact between partners, even in cultures that normally had strong prohibitions against it. The betrothal period was also considered to be a preparatory time, in which the groom built a house, started a business or otherwise proved his readiness to enter adult society.[citation needed]
In medieval Europe, in canon law, a betrothal could be formed by the exchange of vows in the future tense ("I will take you as my wife/husband", instead of "I take you as my wife/husband"), but sexual intercourse consummated the vows, making a binding marriage rather than a betrothal. Although these betrothals could be concluded with only the vows spoken by the couple, they had legal implications: Richard III of England had his older brother's children declared illegitimate on the grounds their father had been betrothed to another woman when he married their mother.[8]
A betrothal is considered to be a "semi-binding" contract. Normal reasons for invalidation of a betrothal include:
- Revelation of a prior commitment or marriage
- Evidence of infidelity
- Failure to conceive (in "trial marriage" cultures)
- Failure of either party to meet the financial and property stipulations of the betrothal contract
Normally, either party can break a betrothal, though in certain traditions, a financial penalty (such as forfeit of the bride price) applies. In some common law countries, including England and Wales and many US states, it was once possible for the spurned partner (often only the woman) to sue the other for breach of promise or "heart-balm". This provided some protection in an age where virginity at marriage was considered important and having a failed engagement could damage one's reputation, but this tort has become obsolete in most jurisdictions as attitudes to premarital sex have softened and emphasis shifted to allowing people to leave loveless relationships.[9]
Judaism
[edit]In Jewish weddings during Talmudic times (c.1st century BC – 6th century AD), the two ceremonies of betrothal (erusin) and wedding usually took place up to a year apart; the bride lived with her parents until the actual marriage ceremony (nissuin), which would take place in a room or tent that the groom had set up for her. Since the Middle Ages the two ceremonies have taken place as a combined ceremony performed in public. The betrothal is now generally part of the Jewish wedding ceremony, accomplished when the groom gives the bride the ring or another object of at least nominal value.[10] As mentioned above, betrothal in Judaism is separate from engagement; breaking a betrothal requires a formal divorce, and violation of betrothal is considered adultery.[11]
Christianity
[edit]
In most localities, the Rite of Betrothal (also known as "blessing an engaged couple" or "declaration of intention") as a precursor to Holy Matrimony is an optional practice in traditional forms of Christianity today that blesses and ratifies the intention of two Christians to marry one another.[4] Many Christian denominations provide liturgies for Christian betrothal, which often feature prayer, Bible readings, a blessing of the engagement rings (in cultures in which rings are used), and a blessing of the couple.[2] A betrothal makes what a couple promises to one another sanctified by God and the Church.[12] A Christian engagement (betrothal) ceremony, which may be followed with a party, is normative in certain parts of the world, as with the Christians of India and Pakistan.[13][14]
Catholic Church
[edit]Historically, betrothal in Roman Catholicism is a formal contract considered as binding as marriage, and a divorce is necessary to terminate a betrothal.[15] Betrothed couples are regarded legally as husband and wife – even before their wedding and physical union. The concept of an official engagement period in Western European culture may have begun in 1215 at the Fourth Lateran Council, headed by Pope Innocent III, which decreed that "marriages are to be ... announced publicly in the churches by the priests during a suitable and fixed time so that, if legitimate impediments exist, they may be made known."[16][17] Such a formal church announcement of the intent to marry is known as banns. In some jurisdictions, reading the banns may be part of one type of legal marriage.
Protestant Churches
[edit]The Lutheran book of Liturgical Forms includes the "Form and Manner of Betrothal in Church", which can take place in the church or alternatively, in the house of the bride.[1] This rite can be found throughout history, such as in early Lutheran liturgical texts, the Stasbourg C.O. 1604 being an example.[1] Liturgical Forms states that The Rite of Betrothal is seen as an "admirable practice of plighting one's troth in church, so in keeping with the holiness and importance of marital betrothal as the incipient marital life."[1]
The 2019 Book of Common Prayer, used by Anglican Christian denominations such as the Anglican Church in North America, includes a Christian rite of betrothal called "A Brief Liturgy for the Signing of the Declaration of Intention" in which a Christian couple ratifies their intention before God and the Church to marry.[4] During this liturgy, the following is signed and dated by the engaged couple after the sign of peace:[4]
“We, N.N. and N.N., desiring to receive the blessing of Holy Matrimony in the Church, do solemnly declare that we hold marriage to be a lifelong union of husband and wife as it is set forth in the Book of Common Prayer. We believe it is established by God for the procreation of children, and their nurture in the knowledge and love of the Lord; for mutual joy, and for the help and comfort given one another in prosperity and adversity; to maintain purity, so that husbands and wives, with all the household of God, might serve as holy and undefiled members of the Body of Christ; and for the upbuilding of Christ’s kingdom in family, church, and society, to the praise of his holy Name. We do engage ourselves, so far as in us lies, to make our utmost effort to establish this relationship and to seek God’s help thereto.”[4]
Following the signing of the declaration of intention, the couple is blessed by the priest:[4]
Now that N. and N. have declared their intention for a Holy Marriage, and have begun the process of pre-marital preparation, let us pray for their relationship [and for their families].
Almighty God, we thank you for the love of N. and N., and we ask your blessing upon them [and their families] during this time of preparation. Open their minds and hearts to one another, enable them faithfully to receive your Word and Sacrament, and help us to support them, that they may rightly prepare for their marriage. And, we pray, give us wisdom to uphold and encourage all who have been united in Holy Matrimony; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.[4]
The Lutheran Churches, the Anglican Communion, the Methodist Churches and the Presbyterian Churches have questions and responses for family members in its Rite of Betrothal, which is sometimes incorporated into the Service of Holy Matrimony itself.[18][1]
Orthodox Churches
[edit]In the Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox Churches, the Rite of Betrothal is traditionally performed in the narthex (entranceway) of the church, to indicate the couple's first entrance into the married estate. The priest blesses the couple and gives them lit candles to hold. Then, after a litany, and a prayer at which everyone bows, he places the bride's ring on the ring finger of the groom's right hand, and the groom's ring on the bride's finger. The rings are subsequently exchanged three times, either by the priest or by the best man, after which the priest says a final prayer. Traditionally, the betrothal service takes place at the time the engagement is announced, though in certain localities it may performed immediately before the wedding ceremony itself. The exchange of rings is not a part of the wedding service in the Eastern Churches, but only occurs at the betrothal ceremony. Traditionally, the groom's ring is gold and the bride's ring is silver.[19]

Engagement rings
[edit]
Customs for engagement rings vary according to time, place, and culture. An engagement ring has historically been uncommon, and when such a gift was given, it was separate from the wedding ring.
The first instance of the tradition of giving a ring for marriage in the Hebrew Bible is in Genesis 24:22, when a golden nose ring (Chayei Sarah 24:22) was given by Eliezer of Damascus to Rebecca,[20] with Saadiah Gaon also citing as a possible source of the practice in the phrase in Nehemiah 7:46 be’nei tabbaot (children of the rings).[citation needed] The latter case refers to betrothal (see above) rather than engagement; one of the three ways in which betrothal may be effected in Judaism is by the husband giving the bride money or an object of at least nominal value. In fact, it is a long-standing practice within Judaism to contract the betrothal with a ring.
The practice of a marriage ring in Byzantine Empire date back to 3rd century CE.[21]
Romantic rings from the time of the Roman Empire sometimes bore clasped hands symbolizing contract,[22] from which the later Celtic Claddagh symbol (two hands clasping a heart) may have evolved as a symbol of love and commitment between two people. Romans believed the circle was a bond between the two people who were to be married and signified eternity, but was first practiced on the fourth finger/ring finger by the Romans, who believed this finger to be the beginning of the vena amoris ("vein of love"), the vein that leads to the heart.[23] In cultures with European origin, and many other countries, an engagement ring is worn following the practice of the Romans who "...wore the ring either on the right middle finger or the left ring [4th] finger, from which, according to ancient Egyptian physicians, a nerve led directly to the heart."[23] The custom in Continental Europe and other countries is to wear it on the right hand. One historical exception arose in monarchical regimes, in which a nobleman entering into morganatic marriage, a marriage in which the person, usually the woman, of lower rank stayed at the same rank instead of rising ranks, would present their left hand to receive the ring, hence the alternative term "marriage with the left hand" (Ger. Ehe zur linken Hand), the offspring of such marriages considered to be disinherited from birth.[24]
The modern Western form of the practice of giving or exchanging engagement rings is traditionally thought to have begun in 1477 when Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor, gave Mary of Burgundy a diamond ring as an engagement present.[25]
In other countries like Argentina, men and women each wear a ring similar to wedding bands. They are made of silver ("alianza de plata") when manifesting an informal "boyfriend-girlfriend" relationship, though this first step might not always happen; howbeit depending on finances, this may be the only ring given at all. The gold band ("anillo de compromiso" or "alianza de oro") is given to the bride when the commitment is formal and the [optional] diamond ring ("cintillo") is reserved for the wedding ceremony when the groom gives it to the bride. The gold band that the groom wore during the engagement – or a new one, as some men choose not to wear them during engagement – is then given to the groom by the bride; and the bride receives both the original gold band and the new diamond at the ceremony. The bride's diamond ring is worn on top of the engagement band at the wedding and thereafter, especially at formal occasions or parties; otherwise the engagement band suffices for daily wear for both parties. At the wedding, the rings are swapped from the right to the left hand. In Brazil, they are always made of gold, and there is no tradition for the engagement ring. Both men and women wear the wedding band on their right hand while engaged, and, after they marry, they shift the rings to their left hands.
In the modern era, some women's wedding rings are made into two separate pieces. One part is given to her to wear as an engagement ring when she accepts the marriage proposal and the other during the wedding ceremony. When worn together, the two rings look like one piece of jewelry.[26] The engagement ring is not worn during the wedding ceremony, when the wedding ring is put by the groom on the finger of the bride, and sometimes by the bride onto the groom's finger. After the wedding, the engagement ring is put back on, and is usually worn on the outside of the wedding ring.[27]
Engagement parties
[edit]
In contemporary American culture some engagements are announced at an engagement party, traditionally hosted by the bride's parents. These parties help introduce both the bride and groom's friends and family to each other in one place prior to the wedding. Often contemporary engagement parties are either cocktail parties or dinners with décor kept to a minimum. Gifts are not often given until either the wedding itself or a bridal shower.[26]
In ancient Greece, engagement parties were held without the bride and took place to discuss the legal and economic aspects of the marriage. Later, engagement parties were when both sides announced a legal union prior to marriage where if one side broke the agreement they would have to pay the wronged side. Engagements became non-legally binding and by the early 20th century some couples would announce their engagement in the local paper.[26]
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ To be precise, nesiuin is the process, and chuppah is the method.
Citations
[edit]- ^ a b c d e Lochner, Friedrich; Carver, Matthew (2023). Liturgical Forms. Emmanuel Press. pp. 75–79.
- ^ a b "Rites Relating to Marriage: A Statement and Resources from The International Anglican Liturgical Consultation" (PDF). The International Anglican Liturgical Consultation. 2011. pp. 4, 14–15. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. Retrieved 19 September 2021.
- ^ "The Order of Blessing an Engaged Couple" (PDF). Liturgy Office: England & Wales. 2010. Retrieved 19 September 2021.
- ^ a b c d e f g "A Brief Liturgy for the Signing of the Declaration of Intention" (PDF). Anglican Church in North America. 2019. pp. 213–214. Retrieved 19 September 2021.
- ^ Kaplan, Rabbi Aryeh (1983). Made in Heaven, A Jewish Wedding Guide. New York / Jerusalem: Moznaim Publishing., Chapter 4, See also footnote 1 and 2. The author uses the specific term proposal, and considers this the first step in a formal engagement.
- ^ Norman Bancroft Hunt, Living in Ancient Greece, Infobase Publishing, 2008, p. 44 [ISBN missing]
- ^ Philippe Ariès, Paul Veyne, eds., A History of Private Life: From pagan Rome to Byzantium, Harvard University Press, 1992, p. 467 [ISBN missing]
- ^ Sutton, Anne F. (9 May 2021). "The pre-contract". Richard III Society. Retrieved 22 August 2025.
- ^ Nancy R. Gallo (2004). "Left at the Altar". Introduction to Family Law. Cengage Learning. pp. 114–116. ISBN 1401814530.
- ^ See Talmud Kiddushin, Mishna 1:1 and the main article
- ^ "The Jewish Betrothal (Kiddushin)". /www.chabad.org. Retrieved 15 August 2022.
- ^ Aabram, Virginia (29 August 2021). "What Is the Rite of Betrothal?". National Catholic Register. Retrieved 19 September 2021.
- ^ Das, Debomitra (21 June 2021). "Meanings of rituals in Christian weddings". The Times of India. Retrieved 24 September 2021.
- ^ O'Brien, John (2006). The Construction of Pakistani Christian Identity. Research Society of Pakistan. p. 247. ISBN 978-969-425-096-0.
- ^ Martin, Ernest L. "Marriage, Divorce, Living Together and the Bible".
- ^ Medieval Sourcebook: Twelfth Ecumenical Council: Lateran IV 1215
- ^ Utunumsint.org Archived 2006-07-12 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Prichard, Robert W. (2009). Cohabiting Couples and Cold Feet: A Practical Marriage-Preparation Guide for Clergy. Church Publishing, Inc. p. 107. ISBN 978-0898696035.
The Episcopal Book of Common Prayer of 1979 reworked the betrothal by adding a positive question to the congregation immediately after the couple speaks their words of betrothal. The celebrant asks the congregation, "Will all of you witnessing these promises do all in your power to uphold these two persons in their marriage?" The congregation's response is, "We will." This inquiry was expanded in The United Methodist Hymnal (1989) and the Presbyterian Book of Common Worship (1993) into separate questions for family members and for other members in the congregation.
- ^ Hapgood, Isabel F. (1922). Service Book of the Holy Orthodox-Catholic Apostolic Church. Englewood, NJ: Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese (published 1975). pp. 291 ff, 604–605.
- ^ Herczeg, Y.I.Z, The Torah: with Rashi's commentary, Vol.1, Mesorah Publications, New York, 2000, p. 253
- ^ "Byzantine Marriage Ring". World History Encyclopedia. 9 March 2018.
- ^ Catherine Johns, The jewellery of Roman Britain: Celtic and classical traditions, Routledge, 1996, pp. 63–64
- ^ a b Philippe Ariès, Paul Veyne, A History of Private Life: From pagan Rome to Byzantium, Harvard University Press, 1992, p. 467
- ^ Marie Maclean, The name of the mother: writing illegitimacy, Routledge, 1994, p. 191
- ^ Michael R Collings, Gemlore: An Introduction to Precious and Semi-Precious Stones, Wildside Press LLC, 2009, p. 50
- ^ a b c The social history of the American family : an encyclopedia. Marilyn Coleman, Lawrence H. Ganong. Thousand Oaks, CA. 2014. pp. 437–438. ISBN 978-1-4522-8614-3. OCLC 885009365.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link) - ^ The most failed engagement
Bibliography
[edit]- Rite of Betrothal. Society of Saint Pius X.
- Shorter Book of Blessings. International Commission on English in the Liturgy. 1 January 1990.
External links
[edit]- Christian Betrothal (Engagement) Ceremony - Church of North India (United Protestant Christian)
- The Order of Blessing an Engaged Couple - Western Christian Betrothal Rite
- A Brief Liturgy for the Signing of the Declaration of Intention (Anglican Christian)
- The Service of Betrothal Archived 2023-05-23 at the Wayback Machine (Eastern Orthodox Christian)
- Weddings & Blessings in Church (Methodist Christian)
- Solemn Rite of Betrothal and Publishing of the Banns (Roman Catholic Christian)
Engagement
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Historical Context
Meaning and Purpose
Engagement constitutes a mutual promise or contract for a future marriage, serving as a formal pre-marital commitment that distinguishes it from casual dating, which involves informal romantic involvement without such a pledge, and cohabitation, which entails shared living arrangements absent a specific intent to wed.[9] Historically and contemporarily, the engagement period fulfills several key purposes in relationships, including solidifying the partners' commitment to one another, integrating family involvement in the impending union, enabling practical wedding planning, and providing an opportunity to assess long-term compatibility through deeper relational exploration. This phase allows couples to address emerging concerns and uncertainties, thereby reducing the risk of future marital dissolution by facilitating informed decision-making about continuing the relationship. In modern contexts, it also supports preparatory activities like premarital education, which strengthens relational foundations before legal marriage. Psychological research from the 20th and 21st centuries highlights significant benefits of the engagement period, such as heightened relationship satisfaction as couples approach marriage. Longitudinal studies indicate that satisfaction levels typically increase during this time, peaking just before the wedding, which contributes to emotional stability and mutual investment in the partnership. Furthermore, engagement enables access to premarital counseling, which enhances communication skills, lowers conflict levels, and boosts overall relationship quality, with evidence showing it can reduce divorce rates by approximately 30% among participating couples. These benefits extend to decreased breakup likelihood during the transition to marriage, as the formalized commitment fosters greater dedication and confidence compared to less structured romantic stages. The duration of engagements varies widely, ranging from short-term periods of a few months—common in cultures like India where averages are 5-6 months—to longer ones spanning several years, though global averages in many Western countries fall between 12 and 18 months, allowing sufficient time for preparation without undue prolongation.[10]Etymology and Origins
The term "engagement" in the context of betrothal—being betrothed (adjective/noun, meaning engaged): American /bɪˈtroʊðd/ (bih-TROTHD, two syllables); British /bɪˈtrəʊðd/ (bih-TROHTHD). Stress on second syllable; voiced "th" (/ð/) common.[11][12][13]—derives from the English noun formed in the 1620s by adding the suffix "-ment" to the verb "engage," signifying a formal promise or pledge, including a marriage commitment.[14] The root verb "engage" entered English in the early 15th century from Old French "engagier," meaning "to pledge" or "to bind under pledge," itself derived from "en gage" ("in pledge"), tracing back to Frankish and Proto-Germanic origins related to security or obligation.[15] By the 16th century, "engaged" had evolved to specifically denote being betrothed, as seen in its use as a past-participle adjective for affianced individuals around 1610.[16] The concept of engagement as a binding pre-marital agreement has ancient roots in Mesopotamian society, where betrothal was treated as an enforceable contract under the Code of Hammurabi, circa 1750 BCE. This Babylonian legal code outlines provisions for betrothal, such as penalties for a father who sexually defiles his son's betrothed, requiring compensation equivalent to half a mina of silver, underscoring its status as a solemn, legally binding pledge akin to marriage.[17] Similarly, in ancient Egypt, betrothal-like arrangements involved verbal or written pledges focusing on property and support, often formalized through contracts that detailed the bride's dowry and protections in case of dissolution, without a distinct ceremonial engagement but emphasizing mutual commitments to establish the household.[18] In early Greco-Roman traditions, betrothal—known as sponsalia—served as a semi-legal oral agreement preceding marriage, typically involving the exchange of gifts and the arrangement of a dowry from the bride's family to support the union economically.[19] This pledge was voidable at will but carried social and financial obligations, such as returning any dowry if the agreement dissolved, reflecting its role as a preliminary contract to ensure familial consent and stability before the full marital rite.[20] The transition to medieval Europe saw the Christian Church exert significant influence, formalizing engagement by the 12th century as a sacramental precursor to marriage, where mutual consent formed the indissoluble bond, drawing on earlier Roman sponsalia but elevating it through theological developments in canon law.[21] Theologians like Peter Lombard and Gratian integrated engagement into sacramental theology, viewing it as the initial promise that initiated the grace of matrimony, shifting it from a secular contract to a religiously sanctioned step.[22]Evolution Across Cultures
In non-Abrahamic traditions, engagement practices in ancient China emphasized family-mediated arrangements through matchmakers and contractual agreements, particularly during the Han Dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE), where betrothal gifts were exchanged to formalize unions between compatible social classes.[23] Similarly, in India, arranged engagements trace back to the Vedic period (circa 1500–500 BCE), as referenced in texts like the Rigveda, which highlight family-orchestrated matches prioritizing caste (varna) compatibility to preserve social and ritual purity.[24] Across African and Indigenous cultures, engagement often involved oral pledges and communal negotiations rather than written contracts. In sub-Saharan African societies, such as among the Yoruba and Zulu, bride price (lobola or ilobolo) negotiations served as a key engagement ritual, where the groom's family presented livestock or goods to the bride's kin, symbolizing alliance and commitment through verbal agreements witnessed by elders.[25] In Polynesian traditions, like those of the Māori in New Zealand, intent to marry was marked by communal feasts (hāngi) and family discussions, reinforcing tribal bonds and shared ancestry without formal rings or ceremonies.[26] Colonialism in the 19th and 20th centuries introduced Western engagement norms, such as romantic proposals and diamond rings, to Asia and Africa, often blending with indigenous customs amid missionary and legal influences. In the Philippines, Spanish colonial rule (1565–1898) integrated Catholic elements into pre-existing practices, evolving the indigenous family consent ritual into "pamamanhikan," where the groom's relatives formally meet the bride's family to seek approval, combining communal negotiation with Christian vows.[27] This hybridization occurred across regions, as British and French administrators imposed monogamous, individualized marriage laws in Africa, gradually eroding polygamous pledges while retaining economic exchanges like bride price.[28] In the 20th and 21st centuries, globalization, women's rights movements, and urbanization have spurred shifts toward secular, egalitarian engagements worldwide. In India, arranged marriages—once nearly universal—have declined due to education and mobility, with self-chosen unions rising from about 3% in the 1970s to 6.4% by the 2000s, and further to approximately 10-15% as of 2023, though family involvement remains common.[29][30] These changes reflect broader trends, such as increased individual agency in partner selection across urban Asia and Africa, influenced by feminist advocacy and economic independence.[31]Religious Traditions
In Judaism
In Jewish tradition, engagement, or erusin (betrothal), originates in biblical narratives and was formalized through rabbinic law as a distinct, legally binding stage preceding full marriage, or nissuin. The biblical account of Isaac and Rebekah's betrothal in Genesis 24 exemplifies early practices, where Abraham's servant arranges the union on behalf of his master, and Rebekah consents to travel and marry Isaac, highlighting familial negotiation and the bride's agreement within clan boundaries.[32] This two-stage process—erusin as a commitment establishing marital status without cohabitation, followed by nissuin consummating the union—received detailed codification in the Talmud's Tractate Kiddushin, compiled circa 200–500 CE, which outlines erusin as effected through money, contract, or symbolic act in the presence of witnesses, rendering it irrevocable without a formal divorce (get).[33] Central rituals underscore the contractual nature of Jewish engagement. The tena'im, or engagement conditions, is a document signed by the couple, parents, and witnesses, specifying mutual obligations such as financial support, fidelity, and penalties for breach, often invoking hopes for the Messiah's arrival before the wedding.[34] Historically signed weeks or months prior to the wedding in some communities, it evolved into a vestigial custom among certain Ashkenazi groups, sometimes performed at an engagement party with a plate-smashing ritual to symbolize the breaking of past ties. In Ashkenazi practice, the aufruf ceremony occurs during Shabbat services shortly before the wedding, where the groom is called to the Torah for an aliyah (honor), followed by communal blessings, the throwing of candies for fertility, and a festive kiddush, publicly announcing the betrothal and invoking divine favor on the union.[35] During the Diaspora, particularly in medieval Europe, arranged engagements served to strengthen communal ties and preserve Jewish identity amid persecution and isolation. Families negotiated matches to ensure economic stability and endogamy, with young brides often betrothed to maintain lineage and cultural continuity in scattered Ashkenazi communities.[36] In contemporary Judaism, practices vary by denomination. Orthodox communities uphold the traditional two-stage framework, viewing erusin as halachically binding and requiring a get to dissolve a broken engagement, thereby protecting women's legal status. Reform Judaism, by contrast, treats engagement as a symbolic commitment emphasizing mutual partnership and equality, often integrating egalitarian elements without the stringent legal separations of erusin and nissuin.[37]In Christianity
In Christianity, the theological foundation of engagement draws from New Testament accounts of betrothal, particularly the legally binding pledge between Mary and Joseph before the birth of Jesus, as described in Matthew 1:18-19, where Joseph considers quietly divorcing Mary due to her pregnancy, underscoring betrothal's contractual nature under Jewish custom influencing early Christian practice.[38] This betrothal exemplifies a solemn commitment preparatory to marriage, rooted in mutual promise and fidelity, which early Church Fathers interpreted as a model for Christian unions emphasizing divine purpose over mere social arrangement.[39] In the Catholic tradition, engagement serves as a public declaration of intent to marry, formalized through a liturgical rite in the church where the couple exchanges promises of future consent, witnessed by a priest who blesses a ring as a symbol of fidelity.[40] The 1917 Code of Canon Law (Canons 1011-1017) codified betrothal as a unilateral or bilateral promise governed by particular law, requiring free consent without coercion to ensure the validity of the subsequent sacramental marriage; this framework persists in the 1983 Code (Canon 1062), with breaches addressed under local episcopal norms. If impediments arise before the wedding, they must be addressed to ensure the validity of the subsequent sacramental marriage, potentially through consultation with church authorities.[41][42] The Council of Trent in 1563 further standardized marriage vows by mandating public ecclesiastical form for validity, elevating engagement as a preparatory step to prevent clandestine unions and reinforce the sacrament's indissolubility, thereby influencing Catholic practices to prioritize informed, voluntary commitment.[43] Protestant denominations vary in their approach to engagement, generally emphasizing personal commitment and spiritual preparation over formalized rituals, with many requiring premarital counseling to foster mutual understanding and faith-based readiness. In Lutheran and Anglican contexts, such counseling sessions, often involving clergy-led discussions on biblical roles in marriage, underscore voluntary partnership as essential to Christian union. Evangelical traditions highlight purity pledges during engagement, where couples publicly commit to chastity until marriage through signed covenants or ring ceremonies, reflecting a focus on holiness and accountability within community settings.[44] Eastern Orthodox Christianity distinguishes engagement through the Rite of Betrothal (also called the Service of Offertoria), a preliminary liturgical act separate from the wedding's Rite of Crowning, during which the priest blesses and places rings on the couple's right hands three times as a pledge of faithful union in faith, harmony, and love, witnessed by a sponsor who may interchange the rings.[45] This rite, performed at the church entrance, symbolizes voluntary commitment without consummation, contrasting with the subsequent crowning that unites the couple mystically as one flesh under God. While Eastern Orthodox practices (e.g., Greek and Russian) uniformly feature right-hand ring placement and sponsor involvement, minor Western Orthodox variations, such as in some Antiochian communities, may adapt timing or prayers but retain the core distinction from the crowning.[46] Historically, Christian engagement shifted from medieval practices often involving familial arrangements or forced unions under canon law, where consent was required but parental authority dominated, to a post-Reformation emphasis on mutual consent as the cornerstone of validity, driven by Protestant reformers like Martin Luther who elevated personal choice and egalitarian partnership to counter clerical overreach and affirm marriage's divine ordinance.[47] This evolution, solidified by Trent's reforms on the Catholic side, transformed engagement into a deliberate, consensual prelude to sacramental or covenantal marriage across denominations.[48]In Islam
In Islamic tradition, engagement, referred to as khitbah, serves as a non-binding preliminary agreement between prospective spouses and their families, preparing for the eventual marriage contract known as nikah. The Qur'an encourages marriage as a means to preserve chastity and family stability, particularly in Surah An-Nur (24:32), which states: "And marry the unmarried among you and the righteous among your male slaves and female slaves. If they should be poor, Allah will enrich them from His bounty". This verse underscores the importance of timely unions for eligible individuals, with khitbah acting as an interim step to facilitate compatibility assessment without legal obligations. Additionally, the Prophet Muhammad exemplified seeking familial consent during proposals, as narrated in hadiths where he emphasized obtaining the bride's and her guardian's approval to ensure mutual agreement[49]. The khitbah process typically involves a verbal or written proposal, often framed as ijab (offer) from the groom's side and qabul (acceptance) from the bride's, though these terms more formally apply to the nikah itself; during engagement, they signify informal commitment. Discussions about the mahr—a mandatory bridal gift from the groom—commonly occur at this stage to outline financial responsibilities, but the agreement remains revocable without penalties until the nikah is solemnized. This phase allows families to evaluate social, religious, and economic compatibility, aligning with Islamic principles of consent and equity in marital preparation.[50] Differences between Sunni and Shia interpretations highlight varying emphases on guardianship. In Sunni schools, particularly Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali, the involvement of a wali (guardian, typically the bride's father or male relative) is essential during khitbah to protect the bride's interests and validate the proposal[51]. In contrast, Shia (Ja'fari) jurisprudence grants greater autonomy to adult, sane women, allowing them to engage and contract marriage without a wali if they deem the suitor suitable, reflecting a focus on individual agency in modern contexts[51]. These distinctions stem from interpretations of Qur'anic verses on consent and prophetic traditions. Cultural extensions of khitbah vary across Muslim communities while rooted in Islamic guidelines. In Arab traditions, particularly in Egypt and the Levant, engagement often features feasts where the groom presents shabka—a set of gold jewelry as a symbolic gift to the bride, exchanged publicly to affirm commitment and integrate families[52]. Among South Asian Muslims, arranged khitbah may incorporate horoscope matching (zaicha or kundali milan) to assess astrological compatibility, blending pre-Islamic customs with Islamic emphasis on familial involvement, though scholars caution against over-reliance on such practices[53]. These rituals enhance social bonds but remain secondary to core Islamic requirements. In contemporary Muslim-majority countries, surveys indicate a shift toward love-based marriages, though arranged unions remain prevalent, with familial consent persisting in most cases. As of the 2020s, arranged marriages continue to dominate in many areas; for example, a Gallup survey in Pakistan reported 81% of marriages as arranged (circa 2023), while in Egypt and Iran, familial involvement remains common amid gradual increases in love-based unions in urban settings driven by urbanization, education, and social media.[54]Cultural Practices
Proposal Customs
Proposal customs vary widely across cultures and have evolved significantly over time, reflecting shifts in social norms, gender roles, and individual expression. Historically, in Western traditions, the act of kneeling during a marriage proposal emerged from medieval chivalry, where knights would kneel on one knee to demonstrate loyalty and respect to their lords or noblewomen, a gesture later romanticized in 19th-century literature and adopted as a symbol of devotion in modern proposals.[55] In contrast, many Eastern cultures emphasized family-mediated negotiations for engagements, often involving matchmakers who facilitated discussions on compatibility, dowries, and alliances to ensure social and economic stability, a practice dating back centuries in regions like South Asia and East Asia.[56] Contemporary proposal practices in the West frequently incorporate surprise elements, such as public declarations at iconic landmarks, with the Eiffel Tower in Paris hosting thousands of such events annually due to its romantic allure.[57] Influenced by second-wave feminism since the 1960s, which challenged traditional gender expectations in relationships, proposals have become increasingly gender-neutral, allowing women to initiate engagements more openly—though surveys indicate this remains uncommon, with only about 1% of heterosexual proposals made by women.[58][59] In specific cultural contexts, Japanese engagements often feature the yuino ritual, a formal family gathering where the groom's side presents symbolic gifts—such as dried fish for abundance, sake for harmony, and dried seaweed for good fortune—to the bride's family, sealing the betrothal through an exchange of betrothal money and a contract.[60] Similarly, in various African traditions, particularly among the Akan people of Ghana and in Cameroon, the "knocking" or "knock door" ceremony involves the groom's family visiting the bride's home unannounced or by prior subtle arrangement, bearing gifts like alcohol and kola nuts to "knock on the door" and formally request permission to discuss marriage, emphasizing communal consent and respect for elders.[61] Handling proposal rejections requires sensitivity to etiquette and emotional well-being, as outright refusals can lead to significant distress; studies show that approximately 25% of women have rejected at least one proposal in their lifetime, often citing timing, financial readiness, or relational issues rather than lack of love.[62] In analyzed accounts of rejections, about 30% of relationships continued post-refusal, though 15% involved reports of intimate partner violence, highlighting the potential psychological impacts and the importance of mutual readiness discussions beforehand.Engagement Ceremonies
Engagement ceremonies represent formalized events that solidify the mutual agreement to marry, ranging from intimate family gatherings to elaborate public celebrations depending on cultural norms and social expectations. These rituals often emphasize familial approval and symbolic exchanges, serving as a bridge between the private commitment of a proposal and the public declaration of intent. In many traditions, such ceremonies have historically functioned as semi-private pacts to align families, but in the post-2010s digital era, they increasingly incorporate social media announcements to broadcast the news widely, transforming once discreet events into shared spectacles.[64][65] Key elements of these ceremonies typically include verbal affirmations such as toasts or vows expressing commitment, alongside ritualistic gestures that symbolize unity and prosperity. In some cultures, these may extend to formal signings of preliminary agreements, though the focus remains on ceremonial rather than binding aspects. For instance, gatherings often feature shared meals or offerings to foster harmony between families, highlighting the communal nature of the engagement. These components underscore the ceremony's role in publicly affirming the couple's decision while honoring ancestral customs.[66] In Chinese tradition, the Guo Da Li ceremony exemplifies a structured betrothal event, usually held one to two months before the wedding on an auspicious date selected by a feng shui master. The groom's family presents the bride's family with symbolic gifts such as tea leaves, biscuits, lotus roots, pomegranates, and dried seafood, arranged in a coconut basket to convey sincerity and blessings for fertility and abundance; tea is offered as part of the exchange to honor elders. This ritual, rooted in agricultural symbolism, often involves a modest family assembly where the gifts are received and distributed among relatives, blending private familial dialogue with ritual formality.[67] Mexican Pedida de Mano ceremonies, known as "the asking," center on a formal family gathering where the groom's relatives visit the bride's home to seek parental approval through heartfelt discussions and shared meals. Participants offer blessings and exchange symbolic items during the event, which may include prayers invoking divine favor on the union, reinforcing intergenerational bonds in a setting that balances tradition with emotional intimacy. This rite typically unfolds in a home environment, emphasizing verbal consents and communal toasts over grand spectacles.[66][68] Brazilian noivado ceremonies often manifest as intimate dinner parties hosted by the couple or their families shortly after the decision to marry, providing a relaxed forum for announcing the engagement over home-cooked meals and casual conversations. These events prioritize heartfelt toasts among close kin, allowing participants to express support and share in the joy without rigid protocols, reflecting Brazil's blend of Portuguese influences and modern informality in marking this milestone.[69] In Russian culture, the Pomolvochnyy Vecher, or engagement evening, traditionally involves a family-hosted supper where parents from both sides convene to discuss the union, often beginning with a welcoming ritual of bread and salt to symbolize hospitality, prosperity, and the sustenance of the new household. This gesture, where guests break and share the bread dipped in salt, underscores themes of abundance and mutual care, evolving from ancient Slavic customs into a poignant, semi-private affirmation of familial alliance.[70][71]Symbols and Rituals
In various Middle Eastern cultures, henna designs applied to the hands and feet serve as a prominent non-jewelry symbol of engagement and impending marriage, signifying joy, fertility, and protection from evil. These intricate patterns, often featuring geometric motifs, flowers, and vines, are created during pre-wedding rituals known as henna nights or mehndi ceremonies, where women gather to adorn the bride-to-be, fostering communal bonds and celebrating the transition to married life. In Yemeni Jewish traditions, for instance, the bride's henna ritual acts as a key rite of passage, with red henna paste symbolizing a "marriage stamp" and green leaves representing magical safeguarding, as documented in ethnographic accounts of Yemenite customs.[72][73] In Thai engagement practices, the sinsod represents a monetary pledge from the groom to the bride's family, embodying respect, financial commitment, and gratitude for raising the bride. This tradition, also called the Thai bride price, is presented during the engagement ceremony alongside gold jewelry or other gifts, with the amount reflecting the bride's education and social status—typically ranging from 100,000 to 300,000 Thai baht for middle-class families—and often partially returned to the couple to support their future. Sinsod strengthens familial ties and publicly affirms the groom's ability to provide, serving as a cultural marker of alliance rather than a transactional exchange.[74][75] Rituals surrounding engagement often include pre-wedding purity customs that bless the couple's union, such as the Indian roka ceremony, a North Indian and Punjabi tradition where families exchange sweets, fruits, and garments while elders perform aarti (a light-offering prayer) to invoke divine approval and signify the end of partner-searching. This intimate gathering, hosted by the bride's family, formalizes commitment through verbal vows and blessings, emphasizing familial harmony and spiritual purity ahead of marriage. In contemporary settings, ongoing rituals for engaged couples may involve shared tattoos as permanent symbols of devotion, with matching designs like infinity symbols or coordinates of their meeting place representing enduring unity, or the use of digital apps for collaborative wedding planning, which foster daily interaction and shared decision-making as modern expressions of partnership.[76][77][78][79] From an anthropological perspective, such symbols and rituals reinforce social bonds by publicly affirming commitments within communities. These practices highlight how symbols not only beautify but also ritualize transitions, promoting harmony and reciprocity among participants. In the 21st century, evolving symbols reflect environmental consciousness, with eco-friendly alternatives like tree plantings gaining popularity as engagement gifts that symbolize growth and sustainability over material excess. Couples or families may dedicate a tree through organizations that plant saplings in conservation areas, representing the couple's rooted future and commitment to planetary stewardship, often accompanied by a commemorative certificate to personalize the gesture. This shift aligns with broader trends toward meaningful, low-impact expressions of pledge.[80][81]Modern Aspects
Engagement Rings
The symbolism of the engagement ring centers on its circular form, which has long represented eternity and unbroken commitment across cultures.[82] Traditionally worn on the fourth finger of the left hand, this placement stems from the ancient belief in the vena amoris, or "vein of love," thought to run directly from that finger to the heart—a romantic notion originating in Egyptian and Roman traditions.[83] Although modern anatomy has disproven the existence of a unique vein connecting the ring finger to the heart, with all fingers sharing similar vascular paths to the circulatory system, the cultural persistence of this myth continues to influence ring-wearing customs worldwide.[82] Cultural variations in engagement rings reflect diverse traditions of commitment. In Nordic countries such as Sweden and Norway, both partners often exchange and wear simple engagement rings made from gold or silver, emphasizing equality in the commitment.[84] Contemporary trends in engagement rings emphasize sustainability, inclusivity, and affordability. Lab-grown diamonds have seen rapid adoption, with their market share rising from about 3% of global diamond sales in 2020 to 21% as of 2025, reflecting annual growth rates exceeding 20% driven by lower costs and ethical appeal.[85] Designs increasingly cater to LGBTQ+ couples through gender-neutral styles, such as shared gem settings or non-traditional materials like recycled metals, allowing for personalized expressions of commitment beyond conventional norms.[86] In the United States, the average cost of an engagement ring was $5,200 as of 2024, according to The Knot's surveys of real couples, though this varies by region and preferences for natural versus lab-grown stones.[87]Engagement Parties and Celebrations
Engagement parties are social gatherings held to celebrate a couple's recent engagement, varying widely in format from casual brunches to elaborate themed galas. Casual events often feature relaxed daytime affairs like garden parties or backyard barbecues, while more formal ones may include evening cocktail receptions with themed decorations, live music, and multi-course meals. These parties typically accommodate 50 to 100 guests, focusing on immediate family, close friends, and wedding party members to maintain an intimate atmosphere. They are usually timed within one week to three months after the proposal to capitalize on the excitement of the news.[88][89][90] Etiquette for engagement parties emphasizes inclusivity and simplicity, with hosts bearing primary responsibilities for venue selection, invitations, and refreshments. Traditionally, the bride's parents host the event, though modern practices allow the couple, groom's family, or friends to take the lead, often splitting costs among contributors. Invitations are sent four to six weeks in advance via email, phone, or formal stationery to ensure attendance from wedding-invited guests only. Gift-giving is not expected in many traditions, particularly in the United States, where small tokens like wine or flowers may appear spontaneously rather than from a registry; hosts should avoid mentioning gifts to prevent pressure on attendees.[88][90][91] Cultural variations highlight diverse celebratory styles, such as in Australia where engagement parties often adopt a laid-back vibe with outdoor barbecues emphasizing grilling, casual mingling, and beer among family and friends. In Lebanon, these events—sometimes rivaling the wedding in scale—feature lively dancing like the traditional dabke, accompanied by an array of sweets such as baklava and maamoul to symbolize sweetness in the couple's future. These gatherings unite extended families through music, toasts, and shared feasts, reflecting communal joy in the engagement milestone.[92][93][94] Modern adaptations have expanded accessibility, notably through virtual parties during the COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 to 2022, where couples hosted online events via platforms like Zoom, incorporating virtual toasts, games, and shared digital photo slideshows to connect remote guests. Sustainability has also gained prominence, with eco-friendly invitations using digital formats or plantable seed paper that guests can sow into wildflowers, reducing paper waste while aligning with environmentally conscious celebrations. These innovations allow couples to personalize events amid evolving social and global contexts.[95][96]Legal and Social Implications
In common law jurisdictions such as the United States, engagements are generally considered non-binding agreements, with courts declining to enforce promises to marry since the enactment of "heart balm" statutes in the 1930s that abolished breach-of-promise actions.[97] By the 1950s, most U.S. states had followed suit, eliminating these lawsuits to prevent perceived abuses, though a minority of states retain limited remedies for fraud or conditional gifts like engagement rings.[98] In contrast, civil law systems like France treat certain engagement gifts as conditional donations under the Civil Code, requiring their return if the marriage does not occur, regardless of fault, to uphold principles of equity in pre-marital exchanges.[99] Consequences for breaching an engagement typically do not include damages for emotional distress due to the abolition of heart balm torts, but property issues may arise in long-term cohabitations preceding or during engagement. In the U.S., unmarried couples lack automatic marital property division rights; assets acquired jointly are divided based on ownership titles or contributions, while separate property remains with the original owner unless a cohabitation agreement specifies otherwise.[100] Some states recognize "common-law marriage" after prolonged cohabitation with mutual intent, potentially subjecting commingled assets to equitable division upon separation, though this varies widely and requires judicial determination.[101] Socially, engagements reinforce traditional gender dynamics, with men facing significant pressure to initiate proposals; surveys indicate that only about 2% of women propose to men, perpetuating norms where males bear the emotional and financial burden of the gesture.[102] This can contribute to mental health challenges, including "engagement blues"—a form of post-event depression characterized by anxiety, sadness, or doubt after the proposal's excitement fades, as individuals grapple with the transition to wedding planning and marital expectations.[103] Psychological insights highlight these feelings as normal responses to life changes, often linked to heightened stress from societal pressures rather than relational issues.[104] Contemporary issues include expanded rights for same-sex engagements following the 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide and affirmed equal access to marital institutions, thereby extending legal protections to LGBTQ+ engagements without distinction.[105] Globally, approximately 70-80% of engagements proceed to marriage, with the remainder ending due to incompatibilities or external factors, underscoring engagements as tentative commitments amid evolving social norms.[106]References
- https://www.[researchgate](/page/ResearchGate).net/publication/353566513_Rules_of_engagement_A_content_analysis_of_accepted_and_rejected_marriage_proposals
_-_The_Proposal_(1872).jpg)